Upload
june-anderson
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Met Office GPCI simulationsAdrian Lock
© Crown copyright
UK Met Office simulations in GPCI
HadGAM1 climate – for IPCC AR4 38 levels (~300m at 1km), N96 (~150km)
HadGAM1a climate – development version for AR5
Operational forecast ~ HadGAM1a but different! 38 levels, N216 (~70km) 5 day forecasts from ECMWF analyses (2003)
Dynamics and Physics ~same in both: Grid-point model: semi-implicit semi-lagrangian scheme PBL: K-profile+explicit entrainment; Ri scheme for SBL Massflux: Gregory-Rowntree + aspects of Grant & Brown for shallow Cloud: diagnostic RH scheme, Smith Radiation: Edwards-Slingo
© Crown copyright
Recent Model ChangesForecast upgrade 15th March 2006
•In both forecast and HadGAM1a but NOT HadGAM1:•Convection
•Adaptive detrainment (A. Maidens, S. Derbyshire)
•Boundary Layer•Revised marine scalar surface exchange (J. Edwards)•Non-gradient stress (A. Brown)•Sharp tailed stability functions over Sea (R. Beare)
•Additional changes in HadGAM1a•Major overhaul of aerosols
•Differences between forecast and HadGAM1•cumulus cloud cover parametrization (esp. significant for shallow)•Interactive aerosols
© Crown copyright
GPCI cross-section: problem
Problem with SSTs in the forecast model: Unable to use ECMWF SSTs Can’t use climate SSTs because those are for a 360 day calendar
Both these should become possible soon - rerun Can’t easily include Met Office operational SSTs My GPCI forecasts used a multi-year climatology
[I discovered afterwards!]
© Crown copyright
GPCI cross-section: JJA cloud cover
Colder SSTs in forecast model imply reduced surface fluxes compared to the climate simulations
Spin-up in surface fluxes during forecast (as atmosphere cools down to new SST?)
Sen
sib
le h
eat
flux
(W/m
2)
Late
nt h
eat
flux
(W/m
2)
© Crown copyright
GPCI cross-section: JJA cloud cover
Deep cumulus cloud-top falls during forecast, to ~ climate model level“Anvil” cloud cover increases during forecast to ~ HG1a amount < HG1 = Ad Detr
Mean field
Differences
0 100
© Crown copyright
GPCI cross-section: JJA cloud cover
Stratocu cloud-top rises during forecast to reach ~ level in climate modelCloud cover increasesCloud cover excessive in 5 day forecast “transition region” – lack of GB CF
Cu
© Crown copyright
GPCI cross-section: JJA cloud cover
Higher stratocu top associated with deepening BL during the forecastBL also becomes more well mixed:
•reduced near-surface RH•recall increase in surface fluxes
© Crown copyright
Omega
Rise in cloud top not due to reduced subsidenceAscent in ITCZ increases during forecast > climate
© Crown copyright
GPCI cross-section: JJA cloud amounts
•Reduced stratocumulus in HadGAM1a – reduced aerosol concentrations?•Cu cloud in forecast “transition region” gives large LWP by day 5
© Crown copyright
Climate model TCA
Cross-section representivity? Some quantitative difference
between 5 and 1 year JJA HadGAM1a still loses some Sc Correctly reduced marine
aerosol gives excessive precipitation at low LWP
Precip needs retuning?
JJA 2003 JJA 5 years
© Crown copyright
Zonal winds
Forecast spins up easterlies in tropics HadGAM1a has weaker easterlies than HadGAM1
© Crown copyright
Summary
Deep convection doesn’t penetrate high enough (as high as ECMWF analysis)
Stratocumulus thickens up and rises from EC analysisAerosol change between climate model versions
highlights importance of drizzlePersistent problems with Met Office models in Sc-Cu
transition regions GB shallow cu cloud fraction parametrization helps Still tends to be too cloudy Further work on interaction between cumulus and inversion
Thanks!Questions?
© Crown copyright
Tropical Temperature Errors vs SondesSummer 2005
© Crown copyright
Tropical R. Humidity Errors vs SondesSummer 2005
© Crown copyright
Tropical Wind Errors vs SondesSummer 2005