18
Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Managemen Units for the North Pacific? W. Sydeman 1 , S. Batten 2 , D. Hyrenbach 1 , M. Henry 1 , C. Rintoul 1, D. Welch 3 , K. Morgan 4 1 PRBO Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, U.S.A. 2 SAHFOS, Plymouth, U.K. 3 Kintama Research, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada 4 Canadian Wildlife Service, Sidney, B.C., Canada

“Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

  • Upload
    ena

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

“Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?. W. Sydeman 1 , S. Batten 2 , D. Hyrenbach 1 , M. Henry 1 , C. Rintoul 1, D. Welch 3 , K. Morgan 4. 1 PRBO Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, U.S.A. 2 SAHFOS, Plymouth, U.K. 3 Kintama Research, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

“Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: ManagementUnits for the North Pacific?

W. Sydeman1, S. Batten2, D. Hyrenbach 1, M. Henry1,

C. Rintoul1, D. Welch3, K. Morgan4

1PRBO Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA, U.S.A.

2 SAHFOS, Plymouth, U.K.3Kintama Research, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada

4Canadian Wildlife Service, Sidney, B.C., Canada

Page 2: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Macroecology as a Cornerstone forEcosystem-based Management

• EBM requires identification of appropriate areas for management and human (stakeholder) involvement

• Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) have been suggested as appropriate for EBM, but may not reflect the extent of ecosystems (too large/too small? ecotones/edges?) or the scales of significant ecosystem and human interactions

• Therefore, macroecological investigations within and across LME on community structure, biodiversity, and scale-dependent ecological interactions (temporal and spatial) are required to define eco-regions for management

Page 3: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

HypothesisTop predator (marine bird) and plankton

“communities” may be used to delineate North Pacific eco-regions

• Why? Indicators of habitats on multiple scales (water masses to “hotspots”, persistent and ephemeral ecosystem structures (e.g., fronts/eddies)• Indicators of temporal environmental variability (e.g., ENSO, regime shifts, climate change), and effects on food webs

Page 4: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

…a slight digression…

The Atlantic Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) Project

Long-term ocean ecosystem monitoring (initiated in ~1930 by SAHFOS)

Marine ecology, climate change, fisheries management, biogeography, etc.

Page 5: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

A CPR is a simple, rugged, mechanical device, towed behind merchant ships, that filters plankton

from the seawater

Page 6: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Samples in North Atlantic database (to 2005);imagine the same thing for the North Pacific

Page 7: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Beaugrand et al. 2003 Nature 426, 661-664.

Fisheries Forecasting Application, North Sea

Page 8: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

The Pacific CPR Survey (2000 - ?)

-220 -200 -180 -160 -140 -120

40

50

60

Both North – South and East – West Transects

Batten, S.D., D.Welch and D. Mackas, PIs

Page 9: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

The East – West Transect , 7500 km

Page 10: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Integrated Pacific CPR – Marine Bird andMammal Survey (E-W transect only)

Motivation: study upper- and lower trophic levels simultaneously 4+ years (June 02 – present)

12 integrated predator/plankton surveys (166 sea days; ~23,000 km, database available, NPRB)

Page 11: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Batten, S.D., et al. 2006. Characterising Meso-Marine Ecosystems (MME) in the

North Pacific.

Deep Sea Research II 53:270-290

1. plankton and seabird “ecoregions” match in space (spring 02)

2. plankton and seabird biomass positively correlated 3. ecoregions explained by physical environment 4. 10 “MMEs” (potential management regions) identified

140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240

40

50

60

June 2002

Page 12: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Question for today:

Are plankton/seabird MMEs persistent between seasons and years?

Page 13: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Plankton: 5 years, Summer, Presence /Absence…

Seabirds: 4 years, Spring-Summer-Fall; Relative density of 23 “common” species

Hierarchical Clustering

Methods

Page 14: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Plankton, All Years (dots replaced with

lines)

140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240

40

50

60

NOTE: a cluster color from one year to the next does not represent a particular community – colors show eco-regions not specific

“communities” between years

12

34/5

6

7/8/9?

10

Page 15: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Ben Saenz

The Birds…

Page 16: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

9 ecoregions

8 ecoregions

Page 17: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

1. Season: little persistence in ecoregions

2. Yearly: moderate persistence; most ecoregions represented annually, with less variation in frequency

3. More variation across seasons than years

Spring

Bubble size proportional to frequency

Seabird Community Structure Through Time

Page 18: “Meso-Marine Ecosystems”: Management Units for the North Pacific?

Summary and Conclusions(1) Plankton, seabird communities reveal persistent eco-regions in GOA,

central Bering, greater heterogeneity in West

• coastal B.C., Gulf of Alaska “east”, Gulf of Alaska “west”) – 3 eco-regions (persistent)

• Unimak Pass Area – 1 or 2 ecoregions (ecotone)

• Central Bering Sea – 1 ecoregion (persistent)

• coastal Japan; Oyashio/western subarctic gyre and western Bering Sea - 2-4 ecoregions (not persistent) Why? Diversity? Greater response to climate?

• 7 – 10 eco-regions along this E-W transect

(2) That being said, area boundaries unclear – continuum in community structure, messy (especially highly-mobile birds)

(3) Integrated CPR Survey ideal for determining eco-regions and appropriate spatial units for management; however, future of survey is uncertain……