Upload
eileen-strickland
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Why?
1993 Those with Severe Mental Illness discharged to the street by government
60-85% have mental health issues Misunderstood, stigmatized, ignored Interesting Fact:
The Human Brain can rewire
past damaged areas
Diagnosis Wheel(Gathering the Story)
Informants-Personal
Informants-Professional
PsychologicalTesting
LaboratoryTests/results
Family History
Socio-Cultural History
Medical History
Individual
Diagnosis Flow
Syndromes are ID Wide Range of diagnosis
are created One is chosen to move
forward on Comorbid diagnoses and
arrange in order of importance
Check up with a formulation Reevaluate as new data
emerges
Diagnosis Flow
AdjustIncitingIncident
DiagnosisWheel
DSM-IV-TR
The Diagnostic Statistical Manual Fourth Edition, Text Revision produced by the American Psychiatric Association
DSM-V due 2013 1 of 2 International Benchmarks for Diagnosis
ICD-9-CMGeneral
and Mental HealthCodes
Diagnosis Cross-
Referenced
DSM-IV-TR
Assessments FYI
Clinicians use codified assessment tools– Behavioural– Weschler Intelligence Scales– Weschler Memory Scales– Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)– Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory– California Psychological Inventory– Rorschach– Thematic Apperception Test– Neuropsychological Impairment
Behavioural
Focuses on preceding events/resulting consequences as an understanding factor.
Typical includes: measures of behaviour (overt/covert); antecedents (internal/external); conditions surrounding behaviour; and consequences
Validity: Challenging because of a moving matrix dependent on clinician or team, need definitions to truly understand results.
Weschler Intelligence Scales
Provides 3 IQ: Full scale; Verbal; Performance Main thrust: Accuracy in predicting future behaviour,
long-term predictions however fall short. Bias towards logical thought patterns; middle to
upper-class Caucasian demographics. Norms may not be applicable to other cultures; lower
socio-economic stratas; Enormity of calculations lends to higher end false results due to clinician error.
Weschler Memory Scales
Core component of any thought cognitive assessment.
Diagnosis of: depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, head injuries, stroke, learning disabilities, and neurotoxic exposure stipulate memory complaints.
Administration time is upwards to 42 mins.
MMPI
Standardized questionnaire Provides wide range of self-description scores Quantitative Measure of emotional adjustments and attitude towards test taking. Areas: General health, occupational interests, preoccupations, morale, phobias,
and educational problems. Moderate levels of stability and internal consistency, high overlap with the
different scales, Bias: Gender, Age, Socio-economics, demographics, race, place of residence,
intelligence and education are all variables that if not properly taken into account can skewer results or produce false results.
Used to screen individuals for high stress or sensitive jobs (i.e. air traffic controller)
Primarily Axis I
Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI)
Self-report assessment much like MMPI (personality, emotional adjustment and attitude towards test taking), is one of few that focuses on personality disorders.
Current one is 175 items, separated into 28 scales in these categories: Modifying Indices, Clinical Personality Patterns, Severe Personality Pathology, Clinical Syndromes, and severe syndromes.
Driving Theory: Millon believed in polarity (active-passive, self-other, and pleasure-pain) by ranking these can see if the person is typical or non-typical on the personality spectrum.
Individual’s age, gender and ethnicity should be taken into account, and separate scoring norms have been developed to mitigate false results.
Primarily Axis II
California Psychology Inventory (CPI)
Primarily for young adults with society avg. reading level of Gr. 4 Focused on “Folk Concepts” (culturally relevant), translated into 40
languages. Focuses on typical population and interpersonal behaviours. Assess enduring interpersonal personality characteristics in a typical
population. 20 Scales under general domains:
– Observable, interpersonal style, & orientation (i.e. Sociability, social presence)
– Internal normative orientation & values (i.e. responsibility, self-control)– Aspects of Cognitive intellectual functioning (i.e.achievement via
conformance, intellectual efficiency)– Measures of role and personal style (i.e flexibility, psychological-
Mindedness)
Rorschach
10 inkblots given systematically, individual’s responses tracked to uncover the structure of the personality.
3 General Categories: location (area of inkblot they focused on); determinants (specific properties of blot used in responses); content of response.
Excellent at bypassing an individual’s cognitive inhibitions.
Challenges: Subjective nature, results need to be checked/re-checked,
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Method of revealing dominant drives, emotions, sentiments, complexes and conflicts of personality.
20 pictures in which individual is asked to make up a story: what is happening, thoughts/feelings of characters, events that led up to picture, outcome of event.
2 sessions, given sequence of cards, upwards 2 hrs to administer,
Qualitative not quantitative analysis Up to Clinician Intuitive Clinical Judgment does not allow for
universal standards, those who like say works well, those who detract says does not work.
Best results when apart of a battery of tests Requires for best results a specialized/trained administrator
Neuropsychological Impairment
A battery of tests Individual presents outside of test parameters can
create a false negative (or positive) Types:
– Visuocontructive Abilities– Mental Activity– Memory and Learning– Verbal Functions and Academic Skills– Motor Performance– Executive Functions– Emotional Status– P.518 (Table 12.1)
Axis I Clinical Disorders
Diagnosis pre-18 yrs Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
Factitious Disorders
Delirium, dementia, Amnestic and other Cognitive Disorders
Mood Disorders Dissociative Disorders
Mental disorders due to a General Medical Condition
Anxiety Disorders Sexual & Gender Identity Disorders
Substance related disorders
Somatoform Disorders
Eating Disorders
Sleep Disorders Impulse-Control Disorders Not Elsewhere Classified
Adjustment Disorders
•Other Conditions that May be a Focus of Clinical Attention
Axis II
Personality Disorders
Mental Retardation
Paranoid Schizoid Schizotypal Antisocial Borderline
Histrionic Narcissistic Avoidant Dependent Obsessive-Compulsive
Not Otherwise Specified
Axis III
General Medical Conditions (ICD-9-CM coded)-medical conditions that may cause Mental Disorders.
– Infectious/Parasitic (001-139)– Neoplasm (140-239)– Endocrine, nutritional, & Metabolic, Immunity (240-279)– blood & blood forming organs (320-389)– Circulatory system (390-459)– Respiratory (460-519)– Digestive Systems (520-579)– Genitourinary System (580-629)– Complications in pregnancy, childbirth, and the pueperium (630-676)– Skin and subcutaneous tissue (680-709)– Musculoskeletal System and connective tissue (710-739)– Congenital Anomalies (740-759)– Certain conditions originating in Perinatal Period (760-779)– Symptoms, Signs, and Ill defined Conditions (780-799)– Injury and Poisoning (800-999)
Axis IV
Psychosocial/ Environmental Problems-Used to report factors that may affect diagnosis for Axis I/II
Problems with:– Primary Support Group (Family. e.g.: death, health issues; abuse)– Related to Social Environment (e.g.: racism, retirement, death of friend)– Educational (e.g.: school environment, literacy)– Occupational (e.g.: un/underemployed; stressful work schedule)– Housing (e.g.: homelessness; safety)– Economic (e.g.: insufficient governmental supports; insufficient Income)– Access to health services (e.g.: inadequate, transportation, insurance)– Legal (e.g.: judicial involvement – perpetrator or victim)– Other (e.g.: disasters; war; famine; hostility; discord with professional supports; lack of governmental supports).
Axis V
Global Assessment of FunctioningCan they Function in Society?
1. The G.A.F. scale is a rating scale of 0 to 100 that is used over the time span an individual is receiving treatment to determine functionality.
2. Functioning impeded by physical or environmental limitations is not assessed.
3. These are averaged for the Axis V total and in brackets it is stated when score was e.g. (current), (at discharge) (highest level past year).
Example of DSM-IV Multiaxial Evaluation form
Example 1: (p.35 DSM-IV-TR)
Axis I: 296.23 Major Depressive Disorder, Single episode, Severe without Psychotic Features
305.00 Alcohol Abuse
Axis II: 301.6 Dependent Personality Disorder
Frequent use of denial
Axis III: None
Axis IV: Threat of Job Loss
Axis V: GAF = 35 (current)