58253

INIUS CORPORATION

19CROSBY DRIVE SDMS DocID044235BEOFOROMASSACHUSETTS01730 V617-2-75-297Q REGION I PITEPA CORRESPONDENCE C-583-5-8-133

TO ROSALIE BALDASSARIEPA DATE MAY 24 1988

FROM CAROL M MURPHREE

SUBJECT EASTERN SURPLUS INORGANIC DATA VALIDATION CASE NO 9292 SAS NO 3768A ANALYT-ICA^niNCi Records Center TDD No Flmdash8801mdash21 QTTP- C L IT Reference No $375ME25HRZ2S375ME25HRZ2 ^ mdash CLP Tracking No 8804028 lxBREAK |

8804029 OTHER G

The inorganic data package for Case No 9292 SAS No 3768A consisting of six aqueous (MAH048 - 052 and MAH058) and fourteen soil (MAH039 - 047 and MAH053 - 057) samples from Analytica Inc was reviewed and evaluated based on an NUSFIT Level I Data Validation considering the following parameters

Data Completeness bull Holding Times Calibration Verification Interference QC Results Detection Limits Laboratory Control Sample Analysis Laboratory and Trip Blank Analysis Matrix Spike Results Laboratory and Field Precision Evaluation Standard Addition Results Serial Dilution Analysis

The data package contained all the information necessary to ascertain the accuracy and precision of the six aqueous and fourteen soil samples submitted for inorganic analysis

GENERAL COMMENTS

The samples were shipped on April 12 and received by Analytica Inc on April 14 1988 All metal preparations were performed on April 14 except mercury which was prepared on April 15 All contractually required holding times were met

Initial and continuing calibration verification ICP

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

interference check sample analysis and detection limits were reviewed and all met contractual requirements

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed and results indicated that samples were efficiently digested

AQUEOUS RESPLTS

Mercury (35 ppb) was detected in the trip blank above the instrument detection limit (IDL) It is recommended that all sample results with concentrations less than the action level of 175 ppb be approximated (JBd) Therefore samples MAH048-051 and MAH058 should have their mercury data approximated due to blank contamination No action is applied to the aqueous blank sample (MAH052)

Matrix spike results were reviewed and evaluated for aqueous sample MAH050 The 75 - 125 percent recovery (R) contractual range was not met for silver (126) and zinc (132) during the matrix spike analysis It is recommended that positive silver and zinc sample results be approximated (Jd) and nondetected sample results be accepted It should be noted with respect to zinc that the sample results may be biased as much as 32 percent high and false positive sample results may potentially exist in all aqueous samples Since no silver was detected in the aqueous samples no action is warranted

Laboratory duplicate (MAH050) and field replicate samples (MAH050 and MAH058) were evaluated for precision Precision contractual requirements were met for all elements

Standard Addition Methods were not required for the aqueous samples since arsenic antimony thallium lead and selenium concentrations were less than fifty percent of the spike value Spike recoveries for those elements were also greater than forty percent therefore it is recommended that the data be accepted Duplicate injections were performed for all samples analyzed by Furnace Atomic Absorption Sample results agreed within the plusminus twenty percent Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) evaluation criteria

ICP serial dilution results were reviewed and evaluated to determine whether physical or chemical interferences existed in the sample matrix Contractual requirements were met for all elements analyzed by ICP with the exception of calcium The percent difference (D) for calcium (515D) was exceeded Therefore it is recommended that calcium results in samples MAH048-051 and MAH058 be approximated (Jd) due to matrix interferences

page 2

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

SOIL RESULTS

One element manganese (06 ppb) was detected above the instrument detection limit (IDL) in the laboratory preparation blank The levels of manganese found in the soil samples far exceeded the action level for manganese and therefore no action is warranted

Matrix spike results were reviewed and evaluated for soil sample MAH040 The 75 - 125 percent recovery (R) contractual range was not met for six elements antimony arsenic lead mercury selenium and thallium The following actions are recommended

ELEMENT RECQVERY ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Antimony 0 J (+)R(ND) all soil samples Arsenic 48 J (+)A(ND) MAH039-047MAH054 Lead 320 J (+)A(ND) all soil samples Mercury 74 J (+)A(ND) MAH042 Selenium 65 J lt+)A(ND) all soil samples Thallium 74 J (+)A(ND) all soil samples

NOTE A - accept sample result J - approximate sample result R - reject () sample result ( + ) - positive sample result ND - nondetected sample result

It should be noted that antimony results could be biased low and the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present Because low matrix spike recoveries (R) were observed for arsenic (48) and mercury (74) and the elements were detected in the samples results and detection limits may be biased low (52 and 26 respectively) Due to the high R for lead (320) there exists the potential for false positive results biased as high as 220 Poor spike recoveries were also obtained for selenium and thallium It is recommended that selenium mercury and thallium nondetected sample results be accepted since the evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However it is recommended that detection limits should be approximated and the percent bias determined when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

Laboratory duplicate (MAH039) and field replicate samples (MAH055 and MAH056) were evaluated for precision Precision based on laboratory duplicate results met contractual requirements for all elements Field precision was evaluated

page 3

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

and the following action is recommended

EVALUATION ELEMENT MAH055 MAH056 CRITERIA ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Chromium 22 14 444 RPD J (+) all soil samples Lead 28 14 667 RPD J (+) all soil samples Magnesium 4510 3390 + CRDL J (+) all soil samples

NOTE J approximate sample result C+) positive sample result CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference

The Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was used to quantitate arsenic in samples MAH039 - 044 MSA was also performed for lead results for samples MAH045 MAH053 and the LCS sample and thallium results for the LCS sample All MSA results achieved a correlation coefficient greater than 0995 therefore no action is warranted Duplicate injections were performed for all samples analyzed by Furnace Atomic Absorption and results agreed with the plusminus twenty percent Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) evaluation criteria

Serial Dilution was performed on sample MAH041 and the results met contractual requirements

Based on the data presented by Analytica Inc and the NUSFIT Data Validation the following recommendations are made

Approximate (JB) mercury aqueous sample results below the action level due to blank contamination

Approximate (J) zinc aqueous sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Approximate (J) all calcium aqueous sample results due to matrix interferences (ICP Serial Dilution results)

Approximate (J) manganese results in all soil samples below the action level to due blank contamination

Approximate (J) all positive antimony arsenic and mercury soil sample results due to low matrix spike recoveries Also approximate all positive lead soil sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Reject (R) all nondetected antimony soil sample results due to a zero percent matrix spike recovery

page 4

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

Approximate (J) all positive soil sample results for chromium lead and magnesium due to poor field precision

Approval

cc M Meyers Lee (wo enclosures) T Plant (wo enclosures) I Grossman (wo enclosures) N Smith (wo enclosures) P Gwinn (wo enclosures) D SmithEPA Boston (wo enclosures) D SzaroEPA Lexington (w enclosures)

page 5

91 Sample Locations Sample Number 23OB ~30 J 734 J3U lt433 43A-Traffic Report Number 74U 074019 0707O4 74OSJL 744Cgt4B Remarks SplusmniAK J 4ampTC0FE

Y4040 bull047

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum P Antimony IT ML

Arsenic F-Barium Col Cgt53 C73 C 73 Beryllium Cadmium J5~ Calcium pound1LL rlt9OJr C49V03F [30^1ltT Chromium 0 Cobalt 70 Copper J2 Iron O 1 RI3I C3O amp2A1 amplt3Lead 1L Magnesium 774 CBSN CS6tgt7CW7 CC7L1 T374TManganese Cpound1 ^VJ Cyen3 C43Mercury V P2 3 ampf$ -77Nickel Potassium 717 Selenium Silver 12shySodium MP [01303 C33B31 C9TgtOL Thallium Vanadium Zinc CI3 J-Other

Note

Element was not detected NA Element was not analyzed r-raquo() aoThe reuilt is greater than or equal to the Instrument detection limit but lless than the contract required detection limit CO 3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) 3B Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the Cquality control review obullValue is rejected Aie to contractual requirements examined Airing the vO

quality control review ltN

Analytical Method Oh

F - Furnance Site pound0ssampri St P - ICPFlame AA Case No 9^92- amp4S37669 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory 4J4^vrC4J

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

interference check sample analysis and detection limits were reviewed and all met contractual requirements

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed and results indicated that samples were efficiently digested

AQUEOUS RESPLTS

Mercury (35 ppb) was detected in the trip blank above the instrument detection limit (IDL) It is recommended that all sample results with concentrations less than the action level of 175 ppb be approximated (JBd) Therefore samples MAH048-051 and MAH058 should have their mercury data approximated due to blank contamination No action is applied to the aqueous blank sample (MAH052)

Matrix spike results were reviewed and evaluated for aqueous sample MAH050 The 75 - 125 percent recovery (R) contractual range was not met for silver (126) and zinc (132) during the matrix spike analysis It is recommended that positive silver and zinc sample results be approximated (Jd) and nondetected sample results be accepted It should be noted with respect to zinc that the sample results may be biased as much as 32 percent high and false positive sample results may potentially exist in all aqueous samples Since no silver was detected in the aqueous samples no action is warranted

Laboratory duplicate (MAH050) and field replicate samples (MAH050 and MAH058) were evaluated for precision Precision contractual requirements were met for all elements

Standard Addition Methods were not required for the aqueous samples since arsenic antimony thallium lead and selenium concentrations were less than fifty percent of the spike value Spike recoveries for those elements were also greater than forty percent therefore it is recommended that the data be accepted Duplicate injections were performed for all samples analyzed by Furnace Atomic Absorption Sample results agreed within the plusminus twenty percent Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) evaluation criteria

ICP serial dilution results were reviewed and evaluated to determine whether physical or chemical interferences existed in the sample matrix Contractual requirements were met for all elements analyzed by ICP with the exception of calcium The percent difference (D) for calcium (515D) was exceeded Therefore it is recommended that calcium results in samples MAH048-051 and MAH058 be approximated (Jd) due to matrix interferences

page 2

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

SOIL RESULTS

One element manganese (06 ppb) was detected above the instrument detection limit (IDL) in the laboratory preparation blank The levels of manganese found in the soil samples far exceeded the action level for manganese and therefore no action is warranted

Matrix spike results were reviewed and evaluated for soil sample MAH040 The 75 - 125 percent recovery (R) contractual range was not met for six elements antimony arsenic lead mercury selenium and thallium The following actions are recommended

ELEMENT RECQVERY ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Antimony 0 J (+)R(ND) all soil samples Arsenic 48 J (+)A(ND) MAH039-047MAH054 Lead 320 J (+)A(ND) all soil samples Mercury 74 J (+)A(ND) MAH042 Selenium 65 J lt+)A(ND) all soil samples Thallium 74 J (+)A(ND) all soil samples

NOTE A - accept sample result J - approximate sample result R - reject () sample result ( + ) - positive sample result ND - nondetected sample result

It should be noted that antimony results could be biased low and the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present Because low matrix spike recoveries (R) were observed for arsenic (48) and mercury (74) and the elements were detected in the samples results and detection limits may be biased low (52 and 26 respectively) Due to the high R for lead (320) there exists the potential for false positive results biased as high as 220 Poor spike recoveries were also obtained for selenium and thallium It is recommended that selenium mercury and thallium nondetected sample results be accepted since the evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However it is recommended that detection limits should be approximated and the percent bias determined when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

Laboratory duplicate (MAH039) and field replicate samples (MAH055 and MAH056) were evaluated for precision Precision based on laboratory duplicate results met contractual requirements for all elements Field precision was evaluated

page 3

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

and the following action is recommended

EVALUATION ELEMENT MAH055 MAH056 CRITERIA ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Chromium 22 14 444 RPD J (+) all soil samples Lead 28 14 667 RPD J (+) all soil samples Magnesium 4510 3390 + CRDL J (+) all soil samples

NOTE J approximate sample result C+) positive sample result CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference

The Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was used to quantitate arsenic in samples MAH039 - 044 MSA was also performed for lead results for samples MAH045 MAH053 and the LCS sample and thallium results for the LCS sample All MSA results achieved a correlation coefficient greater than 0995 therefore no action is warranted Duplicate injections were performed for all samples analyzed by Furnace Atomic Absorption and results agreed with the plusminus twenty percent Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) evaluation criteria

Serial Dilution was performed on sample MAH041 and the results met contractual requirements

Based on the data presented by Analytica Inc and the NUSFIT Data Validation the following recommendations are made

Approximate (JB) mercury aqueous sample results below the action level due to blank contamination

Approximate (J) zinc aqueous sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Approximate (J) all calcium aqueous sample results due to matrix interferences (ICP Serial Dilution results)

Approximate (J) manganese results in all soil samples below the action level to due blank contamination

Approximate (J) all positive antimony arsenic and mercury soil sample results due to low matrix spike recoveries Also approximate all positive lead soil sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Reject (R) all nondetected antimony soil sample results due to a zero percent matrix spike recovery

page 4

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

Approximate (J) all positive soil sample results for chromium lead and magnesium due to poor field precision

Approval

cc M Meyers Lee (wo enclosures) T Plant (wo enclosures) I Grossman (wo enclosures) N Smith (wo enclosures) P Gwinn (wo enclosures) D SmithEPA Boston (wo enclosures) D SzaroEPA Lexington (w enclosures)

page 5

91 Sample Locations Sample Number 23OB ~30 J 734 J3U lt433 43A-Traffic Report Number 74U 074019 0707O4 74OSJL 744Cgt4B Remarks SplusmniAK J 4ampTC0FE

Y4040 bull047

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum P Antimony IT ML

Arsenic F-Barium Col Cgt53 C73 C 73 Beryllium Cadmium J5~ Calcium pound1LL rlt9OJr C49V03F [30^1ltT Chromium 0 Cobalt 70 Copper J2 Iron O 1 RI3I C3O amp2A1 amplt3Lead 1L Magnesium 774 CBSN CS6tgt7CW7 CC7L1 T374TManganese Cpound1 ^VJ Cyen3 C43Mercury V P2 3 ampf$ -77Nickel Potassium 717 Selenium Silver 12shySodium MP [01303 C33B31 C9TgtOL Thallium Vanadium Zinc CI3 J-Other

Note

Element was not detected NA Element was not analyzed r-raquo() aoThe reuilt is greater than or equal to the Instrument detection limit but lless than the contract required detection limit CO 3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) 3B Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the Cquality control review obullValue is rejected Aie to contractual requirements examined Airing the vO

quality control review ltN

Analytical Method Oh

F - Furnance Site pound0ssampri St P - ICPFlame AA Case No 9^92- amp4S37669 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory 4J4^vrC4J

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

SOIL RESULTS

One element manganese (06 ppb) was detected above the instrument detection limit (IDL) in the laboratory preparation blank The levels of manganese found in the soil samples far exceeded the action level for manganese and therefore no action is warranted

Matrix spike results were reviewed and evaluated for soil sample MAH040 The 75 - 125 percent recovery (R) contractual range was not met for six elements antimony arsenic lead mercury selenium and thallium The following actions are recommended

ELEMENT RECQVERY ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Antimony 0 J (+)R(ND) all soil samples Arsenic 48 J (+)A(ND) MAH039-047MAH054 Lead 320 J (+)A(ND) all soil samples Mercury 74 J (+)A(ND) MAH042 Selenium 65 J lt+)A(ND) all soil samples Thallium 74 J (+)A(ND) all soil samples

NOTE A - accept sample result J - approximate sample result R - reject () sample result ( + ) - positive sample result ND - nondetected sample result

It should be noted that antimony results could be biased low and the reported concentration is the minimum concentration at which the analyte is present Because low matrix spike recoveries (R) were observed for arsenic (48) and mercury (74) and the elements were detected in the samples results and detection limits may be biased low (52 and 26 respectively) Due to the high R for lead (320) there exists the potential for false positive results biased as high as 220 Poor spike recoveries were also obtained for selenium and thallium It is recommended that selenium mercury and thallium nondetected sample results be accepted since the evaluation of detection limits is beyond the scope of work for NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However it is recommended that detection limits should be approximated and the percent bias determined when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

Laboratory duplicate (MAH039) and field replicate samples (MAH055 and MAH056) were evaluated for precision Precision based on laboratory duplicate results met contractual requirements for all elements Field precision was evaluated

page 3

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

and the following action is recommended

EVALUATION ELEMENT MAH055 MAH056 CRITERIA ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Chromium 22 14 444 RPD J (+) all soil samples Lead 28 14 667 RPD J (+) all soil samples Magnesium 4510 3390 + CRDL J (+) all soil samples

NOTE J approximate sample result C+) positive sample result CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference

The Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was used to quantitate arsenic in samples MAH039 - 044 MSA was also performed for lead results for samples MAH045 MAH053 and the LCS sample and thallium results for the LCS sample All MSA results achieved a correlation coefficient greater than 0995 therefore no action is warranted Duplicate injections were performed for all samples analyzed by Furnace Atomic Absorption and results agreed with the plusminus twenty percent Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) evaluation criteria

Serial Dilution was performed on sample MAH041 and the results met contractual requirements

Based on the data presented by Analytica Inc and the NUSFIT Data Validation the following recommendations are made

Approximate (JB) mercury aqueous sample results below the action level due to blank contamination

Approximate (J) zinc aqueous sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Approximate (J) all calcium aqueous sample results due to matrix interferences (ICP Serial Dilution results)

Approximate (J) manganese results in all soil samples below the action level to due blank contamination

Approximate (J) all positive antimony arsenic and mercury soil sample results due to low matrix spike recoveries Also approximate all positive lead soil sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Reject (R) all nondetected antimony soil sample results due to a zero percent matrix spike recovery

page 4

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

Approximate (J) all positive soil sample results for chromium lead and magnesium due to poor field precision

Approval

cc M Meyers Lee (wo enclosures) T Plant (wo enclosures) I Grossman (wo enclosures) N Smith (wo enclosures) P Gwinn (wo enclosures) D SmithEPA Boston (wo enclosures) D SzaroEPA Lexington (w enclosures)

page 5

91 Sample Locations Sample Number 23OB ~30 J 734 J3U lt433 43A-Traffic Report Number 74U 074019 0707O4 74OSJL 744Cgt4B Remarks SplusmniAK J 4ampTC0FE

Y4040 bull047

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum P Antimony IT ML

Arsenic F-Barium Col Cgt53 C73 C 73 Beryllium Cadmium J5~ Calcium pound1LL rlt9OJr C49V03F [30^1ltT Chromium 0 Cobalt 70 Copper J2 Iron O 1 RI3I C3O amp2A1 amplt3Lead 1L Magnesium 774 CBSN CS6tgt7CW7 CC7L1 T374TManganese Cpound1 ^VJ Cyen3 C43Mercury V P2 3 ampf$ -77Nickel Potassium 717 Selenium Silver 12shySodium MP [01303 C33B31 C9TgtOL Thallium Vanadium Zinc CI3 J-Other

Note

Element was not detected NA Element was not analyzed r-raquo() aoThe reuilt is greater than or equal to the Instrument detection limit but lless than the contract required detection limit CO 3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) 3B Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the Cquality control review obullValue is rejected Aie to contractual requirements examined Airing the vO

quality control review ltN

Analytical Method Oh

F - Furnance Site pound0ssampri St P - ICPFlame AA Case No 9^92- amp4S37669 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory 4J4^vrC4J

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

and the following action is recommended

EVALUATION ELEMENT MAH055 MAH056 CRITERIA ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED

Chromium 22 14 444 RPD J (+) all soil samples Lead 28 14 667 RPD J (+) all soil samples Magnesium 4510 3390 + CRDL J (+) all soil samples

NOTE J approximate sample result C+) positive sample result CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference

The Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was used to quantitate arsenic in samples MAH039 - 044 MSA was also performed for lead results for samples MAH045 MAH053 and the LCS sample and thallium results for the LCS sample All MSA results achieved a correlation coefficient greater than 0995 therefore no action is warranted Duplicate injections were performed for all samples analyzed by Furnace Atomic Absorption and results agreed with the plusminus twenty percent Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) evaluation criteria

Serial Dilution was performed on sample MAH041 and the results met contractual requirements

Based on the data presented by Analytica Inc and the NUSFIT Data Validation the following recommendations are made

Approximate (JB) mercury aqueous sample results below the action level due to blank contamination

Approximate (J) zinc aqueous sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Approximate (J) all calcium aqueous sample results due to matrix interferences (ICP Serial Dilution results)

Approximate (J) manganese results in all soil samples below the action level to due blank contamination

Approximate (J) all positive antimony arsenic and mercury soil sample results due to low matrix spike recoveries Also approximate all positive lead soil sample results due to a high matrix spike recovery

Reject (R) all nondetected antimony soil sample results due to a zero percent matrix spike recovery

page 4

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

Approximate (J) all positive soil sample results for chromium lead and magnesium due to poor field precision

Approval

cc M Meyers Lee (wo enclosures) T Plant (wo enclosures) I Grossman (wo enclosures) N Smith (wo enclosures) P Gwinn (wo enclosures) D SmithEPA Boston (wo enclosures) D SzaroEPA Lexington (w enclosures)

page 5

91 Sample Locations Sample Number 23OB ~30 J 734 J3U lt433 43A-Traffic Report Number 74U 074019 0707O4 74OSJL 744Cgt4B Remarks SplusmniAK J 4ampTC0FE

Y4040 bull047

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum P Antimony IT ML

Arsenic F-Barium Col Cgt53 C73 C 73 Beryllium Cadmium J5~ Calcium pound1LL rlt9OJr C49V03F [30^1ltT Chromium 0 Cobalt 70 Copper J2 Iron O 1 RI3I C3O amp2A1 amplt3Lead 1L Magnesium 774 CBSN CS6tgt7CW7 CC7L1 T374TManganese Cpound1 ^VJ Cyen3 C43Mercury V P2 3 ampf$ -77Nickel Potassium 717 Selenium Silver 12shySodium MP [01303 C33B31 C9TgtOL Thallium Vanadium Zinc CI3 J-Other

Note

Element was not detected NA Element was not analyzed r-raquo() aoThe reuilt is greater than or equal to the Instrument detection limit but lless than the contract required detection limit CO 3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) 3B Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the Cquality control review obullValue is rejected Aie to contractual requirements examined Airing the vO

quality control review ltN

Analytical Method Oh

F - Furnance Site pound0ssampri St P - ICPFlame AA Case No 9^92- amp4S37669 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory 4J4^vrC4J

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

C-583-5-8-113 MEMO TO ROSALIE BALDASSARI MAY 24 1988

Approximate (J) all positive soil sample results for chromium lead and magnesium due to poor field precision

Approval

cc M Meyers Lee (wo enclosures) T Plant (wo enclosures) I Grossman (wo enclosures) N Smith (wo enclosures) P Gwinn (wo enclosures) D SmithEPA Boston (wo enclosures) D SzaroEPA Lexington (w enclosures)

page 5

91 Sample Locations Sample Number 23OB ~30 J 734 J3U lt433 43A-Traffic Report Number 74U 074019 0707O4 74OSJL 744Cgt4B Remarks SplusmniAK J 4ampTC0FE

Y4040 bull047

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum P Antimony IT ML

Arsenic F-Barium Col Cgt53 C73 C 73 Beryllium Cadmium J5~ Calcium pound1LL rlt9OJr C49V03F [30^1ltT Chromium 0 Cobalt 70 Copper J2 Iron O 1 RI3I C3O amp2A1 amplt3Lead 1L Magnesium 774 CBSN CS6tgt7CW7 CC7L1 T374TManganese Cpound1 ^VJ Cyen3 C43Mercury V P2 3 ampf$ -77Nickel Potassium 717 Selenium Silver 12shySodium MP [01303 C33B31 C9TgtOL Thallium Vanadium Zinc CI3 J-Other

Note

Element was not detected NA Element was not analyzed r-raquo() aoThe reuilt is greater than or equal to the Instrument detection limit but lless than the contract required detection limit CO 3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) 3B Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the Cquality control review obullValue is rejected Aie to contractual requirements examined Airing the vO

quality control review ltN

Analytical Method Oh

F - Furnance Site pound0ssampri St P - ICPFlame AA Case No 9^92- amp4S37669 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory 4J4^vrC4J

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

91 Sample Locations Sample Number 23OB ~30 J 734 J3U lt433 43A-Traffic Report Number 74U 074019 0707O4 74OSJL 744Cgt4B Remarks SplusmniAK J 4ampTC0FE

Y4040 bull047

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum P Antimony IT ML

Arsenic F-Barium Col Cgt53 C73 C 73 Beryllium Cadmium J5~ Calcium pound1LL rlt9OJr C49V03F [30^1ltT Chromium 0 Cobalt 70 Copper J2 Iron O 1 RI3I C3O amp2A1 amplt3Lead 1L Magnesium 774 CBSN CS6tgt7CW7 CC7L1 T374TManganese Cpound1 ^VJ Cyen3 C43Mercury V P2 3 ampf$ -77Nickel Potassium 717 Selenium Silver 12shySodium MP [01303 C33B31 C9TgtOL Thallium Vanadium Zinc CI3 J-Other

Note

Element was not detected NA Element was not analyzed r-raquo() aoThe reuilt is greater than or equal to the Instrument detection limit but lless than the contract required detection limit CO 3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) 3B Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the Cquality control review obullValue is rejected Aie to contractual requirements examined Airing the vO

quality control review ltN

Analytical Method Oh

F - Furnance Site pound0ssampri St P - ICPFlame AA Case No 9^92- amp4S37669 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory 4J4^vrC4J

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

SOIL ANALYTICAL RFSI LT5

A -U1) 40 2 ~ltN ^O

Sample Locations Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

MM 03) laquo7

0yengt 7400 47F02 33CXgt

47 0 lt3O 47 044

C30 2 47 ApoundR

lt3amp3 770amp

lt30yen 4707

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony

P

zz ZampFCO SVOO J3TOO COO

ltR WOO BOO 360 CPOO poundgt00

-fishy

Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium

CV

lt3 ST

CO522

6SO lt7 CYFL

( 2600 ltR

yen050 7

21 CyenG-61

73 ltT ES ampbull

S2 yen63 ltT pound471 2M_

0000 +ZR

460 ltR JampL

pound31 3003

ltR

LL COJFI7

J7J7ampD 9 ltT CJ61

6ROO M lt7 64O J 9

7 C7Sl

A ltR pound7 CO-3OL 3 RTE 3O ltR MZ 4 0 900 amp R

1O0 C M_ 0 J F IL C77TD1

ltpound nT yen_ ampJ73

960 lt2SL ML C431 JL ROO 3I RSO ltR 309

gt

L7731

TF-R ML

300 SL ltR

3S0O 33 ltC NO 423

O0J C7721

OJ C4J

23171 73 400 RO32 yen0

4O0Q0 0ltR

40O

R3I C3771

Jshy

JF-R 7 CO yen3-) AL REampI

ltR JL poundLshy33700 9-7 ltR MM 337

32_ C7O01

3ltR 63 COJJ CQ pound621 ltR

pound5J 3

470O 43 ltR

34Q KT 30Lshy

4 C6C71

Silver Sodium

33 33 1poundL

Thallium Vanadium Zinc

-Other

3CL 21 MM

21 A3_

70shy

-IO AL MM

321 AM

22 n 2M

71 ML

7

MM 60

5ZZ W0 pound2L

IX [M

Note

NA (tf)

- Element was not detected - Element was not analyzed - The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but

r- 00I

00

less than the contract required detection limit 3

JB

- Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality control review (data validation)

- Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the quality control review

0QO DltN

- Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the quality control review

Analytical Method oPi-

F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No yenlt92- 37Jgt03 CV - Cold Vapor Laboratory TAgtLVR7R ON

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

Sample Locations

9 o

amp XTshy ltcXF ampXT o

Sample Number Traffic Report Number Remarks

ltbull0 TRSY AV 74S

AEATC FIEZC+RTR SRSSpoundpoundgt7

Inorganic Detection Elements Limits (ppb)

Aluminum Antimony 23OO 8amp1D 91M Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium

an T

07L_ C31 CN COXN

AX3

Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury CV

3DC U lt R

C2-B2 3-51 7CFFO

RO ltT K7

plusmnIpoundshy

1S3Q C3 sT U Y J ZIpound IQJON 9L ltT

-ltR ILL

JSL r

37CC

yenSC ltR IZL

3^0 -T

OIOO + -T 3390 ltR

lt3Q80 + sT

T 7FM

VL M6C DAA

Nickel Potassium Selenium

C31 C67J LZOIL

C721 RyenpoundSI

lt

amp701 Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 0ampR

Note

C871 SampL

C2

M

~C7TJ

^2 ltJ3

ZTV7

3shy

lt2shyiy

N-

Element was not detected r-NA Element was not analyzed oc () The result is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit but oc

less than the contract required detection limit3 Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified in the quality

control review (data validation) JB cc

Value is approximate due to blank contamination identified during the c quality control review vpound Value is rejected due to contractual requirements examined during the CN quality control review

DCAnalytical Method cIn F - Furnance Site P - ICPFlame AA Case No MACV - Cold Vapor Laboratory ltJltR^YS~7C JCTO

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No

Remarks

So1 ids

Inorgani c E1ements

A 1uminum

Ant i mony

Arsen i c

Bar i um

Bery11i um

Cadmium

Ca1ci um

Chromium

CobaIt

Copper

I ron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

N i eke 1

Potass i um

Se1 en i um

Silver

Sod i um

MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAM042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAM046 MAH047

770 720 850 670 750 720 600 940 840

Instrument Detect 1on

L i mits (ugL)

P 1 0 1 0 2 6 2 281 238 301 269 281 337 215 240

~F~ 600 156 167 14 1 895 1 6 0 167 2 0 0 1 2 8 143

T~ 1 0 0 52 56 24 6 0 54 2 8 33 84 2~A

mdash 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 2TT

~p~ 1 0 03 03 0 2 03 03 03 03 0 2 0TT

~p~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11 TTT

~ 2960 769 8 2 2 696 884 789 8 2 2 987 630 705

~p~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 T7A

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

~P~ 130 34 36 31 39 35 36 43 28 TTT

~ 1 0 0 26 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 274

T 50 13 140 1 2 0 150 130 140 34 1 1 0 1 2 0

~P~ 1140 296 317 268 340 304 317 380 243 271

~ 30 08 0 8 07 09 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 6 oTT

~cv 0 2 01 0 1 0 1 01 01 01 0 2 0 1 oTT

~p~ 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 TTT

~p~ 7970 2070 2214 1875 2379 2125 2214 2657 1696 1898

~F~ 50 13 14 1 2 15 1 3 14 17 11

~P~ 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 2 1 27A

~P~ 19400 5039 5389 4565 5791 5173 5389 6467 4128 4619

Page 1

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

CLP INORGANIC ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLE DETECTION LIMITS

(ppm)

Traffic Report No MAH039 MAH040 MAH041 MAH042 MAH043 MAH044 MAH045 MAH046 MAH047 MAH053

Remarks

Solids 770 720 850 670 750 720 60 0 940 840

Instrument Inorgan i c Oetection E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

Tha1 Ii um 1 0 0 2 6 2 8 24 30 27 2 8 33 21 24

Vanad ium 60 21 2 2 19 24 21 2 2 27 17 1 9

Z i nc 90 23 25 2 1 27 24 25 30 19 21 Other 0 0 0 0 00| 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD Site Eastern Surplus F - Furnace AA Case No 9292SAS No 3768A P - ICPFlame AA Laboratory Analytica Inc CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams 10

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis) 200

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm) 02

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis) 100

Page 2

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limi ts

(ugL)

A1uminun P 1 0 1 0 293 878 518

Ant i mony ~F~ 60 0 174 522 308

Arsenic ~F~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Bar i um ~P~ 90 2 6 78 46

Beryl 1ium -pshy 1 0 03 09 05

Cadmium ~ 50 14 43 2 6

Ca1c i um ~ 2960 856 2574 1518

Chromium ~P~ 100 29 87 5 1

Coba 1 t ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Copper ~ 130 38 113 67

Iron ~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Lead ~ 50 14 43 26

___ Magnesi um 1140 330 991 585

Manganese ~P~~ 30 09 2 6 1 5

Mercury ~cv 02 01 04 03

N i cke I ~p~~ 90 2 6 78 46

Potass i um 7970 2310 6930 4087

Se1en i um ~F~ 50 14 43 2 6

Si 1ver ~P~ 1 0 0 29 87 51

Sod i um ~P~ 19400 5623 16870 9949

Page 3

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

Traffic Report No MAH054 MAH055 MAH056 MAH057

Remarks REPLICATE REPLICATE

So1ids 690 230 390 790

Instrument Inorganic Detect i on E1ements Limits

(ugL)

Tha11ium 1 0 0 29 87 51 25

Vanad ium 80 23 70 41 2 0

Zi nc 90 2 6 7B 46 23

Other 0 0 00 00 0 0

0 0 00 00 00

ANALYTICAL METHOD F - Furnace AA P - ICPF1ame AA CV - Cold Vapor

Wet Weight Digested in grams

Digestion Dilution Volume (mis)

Wet weight of sample used for mercury analysis (gm)

Sample Dilution Volume for mercury analysis (mis)

Page 4

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

Project Name TDD No f^ - ltamp -J Reference No

REGIONAL REVIEWOF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE

The hardcopied (laboratory name) PMs-vi^ -ZAJC data package received at Region I has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data reviewed included

Case No SASNo Sampling Date 4u 9ltF Shipping Date

No of samples ltpound-pound Matrix 9amp -t Sog Date Received 8v Lab

Traffic Report Nos r4 -034 mdash TMZ-QSQ

Blank No nf mdash OS^ DuplicateMepficate NOSJ 4ltgt S0Lshy

MRF- 060 OF8TFGUEOGS

Contract No requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports Be Provided by the contractor to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of

O Holding times O Field PrecisionEvaluation O Calibration Verification O Lab Control Sample Results 0 Field and Lab Blank Analysis O Detection Limit Results O Interference QC Results O Standard Addition Results O Matrix Spike Percent Recovery Results O Serial Dilution Results O Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Overall Comments ) laquo AERE NRESIS STRIF amp amppound ) OCampS

GO ARLDJVJOS amppound IampL ampamp AS RTR ^ A ^_sy CUJ RTG TgtNgtBCA

Definition of Qualifiers

A Acceptable data JB Approximate data due to blank contamination J Approximate data due to other quality control criteria Reject data due toquality control review ND Non-detected element + Positive element identification

Reviewer ( ^ Date yy Approval ^ Date 1 amp

January1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

IHolding Times I

Date samples received amp Date prepared (Hg) Date prepared(CN) A)^ Date prepared(all others) bgt ^yenr

Action

If samples are prepared for the analysis of mercury (28 days) cyanide (14 days) or any other element (6 months) in excess of the holding times approximate results for that element If mercury or cyanide are held for over one month in excess of the contract required holding time also reject non-detected results

Remarks 70cJiit AmAS ujene

IIInitial andContinuing Calibration Verification (Form II)

Calibrations wereperformed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency oftenpercent or every two hours during the analysis and metcontractual criteria

Calibrations werenot performed as specified in Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysesandor didnot meet contract-specified windows (specify)

Action Windows Accept Approximate Reject

mercury 50-79 for NO 50-79 for +bull lt50 orgt 150 for +ND

80-150 for NO 121-150 for +

80-120 for bull

all others 50-89 for NO1 50-89 for + lt50 orgt 150 for + NO

90-150 for NO 111-150 for H 90-110 for

NOTE + - positive values ND - non-detected elements 1 - When calibration results fall between 50-79 recovery for mercury and 50-89 for

all other elements an evaluationof detection limits is beyond thescope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

I Blank Analysis Results (Form III)

ContCalib PreparationInitttal Blank Blank Fieldor

Contaminants Calibration Trip Blank Action Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury lt77shyNickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected aboveIDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined bymultiplying thehighest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field tripor laboratory blank by five The action level for sampleswhich have beendiluted should be multiplied by the dilution factor Prior toapplying action values to soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample withthe following calculation

Soil sample action value (mgkg) =

100xAction Value(ugl) Volume dilutedto(ml) IL 1000gms 1 mg X X X X

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000 ml 1 kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

-^0L

I BlankAnalysis Results (FormIII)

WJL

Initital ContCalib

Blank Preparation

Blank Field or Contaminants Calibration TripBlank Action

Blank Value

Aluminum

Antimony

Arsenic

9arium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobait

Copper

Iron

lead

Magnesium 70

Manganese O FPB pound

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Other

Note Contamination detected above IDLs should be evaluatedand qualifiedAction levels are determined by multiplying the highest concentration of contaminationdetermined in any field trip or laboratoryblank by five The actionlevel for samples which have been diluted should be multiplied by thedilution factor Prior toapplying action valuesto soil samplesit is necessary to convert the aqueous action value (ugl) tomgkg for each soil sample with the following calculation

Soil sample action value(mgkg) s

100 x Action Value (ugl) Volume dilutedto (ml) 11 1000 gms 1 mg

solids wet weightdigested (gms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 kg

All results less than action level should be considered highly suspect and reported as JB No action should be taken on the fieldtrip blank value itself

January 1988

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation

Data Review Worksheets

IV ICP InterferenceCheck Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC sampleswere runat thebeginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twiceper 8 hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples were runbut did not meet the control limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of AlCa Fe and Mg are less than 50 of the ICS concentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a level Idata validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation sSOlrData Review Worksheets

IV ICR Interference Check Sample Analysis (Form IV)

The ICP interference check sample analysis is performed to verify the contract laboratories interelement and background correction factors

Interference QC samples wererun at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run (or a minimum of twice per 8hour working shift whichever is more frequent) and were within the control limits specified in the Inorganic DV SOW

Interference QC samples wererun but did not meet thecontrol limits

In general thesample data can be accepted without qualification if the concentrations of Al Ca Fe andMg are less than 50 of the ICSconcentrations

Further evaluation of data not meetingthe interference check sample control limits is beyondthe scope of work for a levelI data validation Refer to Inorganics DV SOW for Level II DV guidelines

Note The 20 contract limit (80-120) is based on the true value for EPA standardsand on the mean value (run at least five times) for non-EPA standards

Remarks

January 1988

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

6l NU5 Corporation -sr-Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sample Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver ltgt3 0 OL JO 6 Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc 63 J0O Other

$2 If the sample concentrationexceeds thespike concentrationby a factor of 4 of moreno action istaken When thesample result an han the contractrequired detectionlimit SR isequal to zero

Calculation R SSR-SR 100

Matrix spikeresults shoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) + Rlt 30 for SSR2R (75-125) for SSR SRND) + R(30-74)forSSRs SR( +) + R (30-74) for SSR3

SR(ND) + Rgt125 SR( +) + R gt125 for SSR4

NOTE[s amount of spike

SSR - spiked sample result SR - unspiked sample result R bull percent recovery ND bull non-detected element + positive result

Olscuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biased significantly low and that the reportedconcentration is theminimum concentration at

which the analyte ispresent

indicate in review memo of thepossibility of false negatives detection limits areelevated over what is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist

Oetermine percent biasof results Report that the detectionlimit may bebiased low

Oetermine percentbias of sampleresults false positiveresults may potentially exist

When the spiked sampleresults fail between 3Q-74S4 recovery an evaluation of detection limits Isbeyond the scope of work for a NUSFiT

Level iOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated and thepercent bias determinedwhen evaluated under a Level

M Data Validation

January 1988

1

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation So Data Review Worksheets

V Matrix Spike Results(Form V)

Sampie Sample

Contaminants SSR SR R Action SSR SR R Action

Aluminum ZOO ZOO A AHZL Antimony JU JO O Arsenic gt-J2-R- 8 yenamp MFJP Y4L Barium yen7 06 ZO4 Beryllium C SO Cadmium JYU V Z 0 Calcium IAplusmnpoundL QUI RFF AT( IApoundL Chromium yyyen0 Cobalt 6ltS R+7 ZEE OO Copper ZZ7 77 Iron Z0OO ZyenOEgt Agt TFJ ZV0 lead 3amp O 3poundQ PFFLT Magnesium gtME ZOZE J9~Manganese ZOO 73 Mercury C- 31 QZJOL 03 74 ML Nickel CLPI ZOO amp Potassium amp A)X A)J VZJSHL Selenium 3 M- aZ Jpound_ Silver J ZD bdquopound4_ Sodium gtlt AJeuro SV Thallium W O 7yen SFITOV Vanadium Z Z R OO pound Zinc zoo yenO Other

If the sampleconcentration exceedsthe spike concentrationby a factor of 4of moreno actionis taken When the sampie result- ess than thecontract required detection limit SR is equal to zero

Calculation R SSR-3R 100

Matrix spike resultsshoui ed toail samples of thesame matrix

Accept Approximate Reject

SR( +) + R lt30 for SSR1 SR(NO) +bull Rlt 30 for SSR2R lt75-125) for SSR SR(ND) +- R(30-74)forSSR5 SR( +) + R30-74)forSSRJ

SR(ND) +- R gt125 SR +) + R gt125 for SSR4

(NOTE S bull amount of spike

SSR spiked sample result

SR - unspiked samplemult

R - percent recovery

NO - non-detected element

+ - positive result

1 - Discuss in review that sampleresults couldbe biasedsignificantly low and that the reported concentrationis the minimumconcentration at

which the analyte Is present

2 - indicate in review memo of the possibility of false negativesdetection limits areelevated over what Is reported and that severe analytical

deficiencies exist 3 - Determine percent biasof results Reportthatthedetectionilmitmaybebiasedlow

4 - oeterminepercentbiesofsampJeresutts false positiveresults maypotentially exist

5 - When the spikedsample results fail between 30-74H recovery enevaluation of detection limits Is beyond thescope of work for a NOSFIT

Level lOata Validation However detectionlimits shouldbe approximated andthe percentbias determined when evaluatedunder a Level

ll Date Validation

A)pound~ - W ARAU-ADZTC

- ZOyen

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix

CRDL OuplicateSample Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or plusmn CROC)

ugL ugkg

Aluminum 200 AJT

Antimony 60 dlti Arsenic 10 aJc Barium 200 til Beryllium fit Cadmium AJC AJamp Calcium 5000 AJC Chromium 10 tic Cobalt 50 4JC Copper 25 AJC Iron

pound301 AjC100 AJamp

Lead AJC Magnesium 5000 poundS(I JC Manganese 15 bull AJC 4Jamp Mercury 02 -Jl bull7 Nickel 40 fit Potassium 5000 ltJc Selenium

mdashtic Silver 10 AJC Sodium 5000 AJampCampOD AJC Thallium 10 AJC Vanadium 50 AJC Zinc 20 AJC Other

Laboratory Ouplicate Actions should beapplied toall other samplesof the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have anRPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPO gt 35

Calculation RPD bull (A-B) x 100

[(A + Bgt2J

NOTE

CRDL - Contract Required Detection Limit

RPD - Relative Percent Difference

A - Sample Result

B bull Duplicate SampleResult

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VI Laboratory Precision Evaluation

Sample Matrix SO1shy

CRDL DuplicateSample bull Criteria

Element Sample ActionNM-03 (RPO or plusmn CRDL)

ugL

Aluminum 200 yen0 yenSOO 3Oo 4CCFR Antimony 60 AJC Arsenic 10 O 0 0 - 0 4CCEFF Barium 200 40 4 amp CESR Beryllium

CO41 AC AJS Cadmium AJC Calcium 5000 OOO VCARRR Chromium 10 AS 3 Cobalt

2JL 50 JO C 6 - J AXL 4Jamp

Copper 25 20QPL CCpoundFTshy22- pound2L feuroSkampSgtpoundAIron 100 TF40O t f fp TFCCESR bullgt

Lead FESU gt$~XCgt 7 CCpoundRR22- 4 Magnesium 5000 OOO 3SIO lt3ltAJO C R F O L TFCCESRshy

ltS gtltManganese lt4CCpoundR FESCTF J15 yen7P S-MO PP V 3R Mercury 02 O - J AJC Nickel 40 plusmnCFOL JCCampSR Potassium 5000 1000 CJ7yen1 4JC Aamp Selenium ML Silver 10 TTC JCCESR Sodium 5000 MLMO Thallium 10 OL AJC Vanadium 50 JROZ5 OZT CFPI Zinc TampgtA

12L 20 JL lt33 SR ~ S

Other

Laboratory Duplicate Actions shouldbe appliedto all other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample result are less than the CRDL then laboratory precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is

gtCRDL If both sample results are greater than 5x the CRDL then calculate the RPD For aqueous

samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for elements

which have anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (AJil 100

((A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredOetection Limit

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A Sample Result

Duplicate Sample Result

AJC 4or

January 1988

8

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field Precision Evaluation

CRDL Sample Duplicate Criteria

Element Sample Action (RPO or t CRDL)

ugl ugkg raquo- CSO

Aluminum 200

Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 poundZl A0 Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium 5000 CEIWO) Cyen7O] AMI AL Chromium 10

Cobalt 50

Copper 25

Iron C0O1 Apound100

Lead

Magnesium 5000 CS86L C4J 0S9amp40 A Manganese 15 C 9amp6ampST A Mercury H2 s gtpound~xC

02 CCER- TSAJRampraquobull 7 Nickel 40

Potassium 5000

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium 5000 [33ANL Aj0 Thallium 10

Vanadium 50

Zinc 20

Other

Field Duplicate Actionsshould be applied toall other samples of the same matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated if either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL then J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than5x theCRDL then calculate the RPO For

aqueous samples J resultsfor elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elementswhich haveanRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100 ((A + B)2]

NOTE

RDL bull Contract RequiredDetectionLimit A bull Sample Result

PD bull Relative Percent Difference B - Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

VII Field PrecisionEvaluation

CRDL Sample $eAjcsampDuplicate

Criteria Element

ugL -0Spound Sample

-CpoundB (RPD or plusmn CRDL)

Action

Aluminum 200 yen0 93QO 0370 Antimony 60

Arsenic 10

Barium 200 yenO iVrir ~ AEf Beryllium poundO3J A2C AID Cadmium

Calcium sooo ceo [37002 Chromium 10 amp yen T ampraquopound bull

Cobalt so Q Copper 25

Iron 100 AO 37Q0 0900 SCCPPR

Lead yen ltR

Magnesium 5000 OOO yen3O 339A FCTDL Manganese 15 11 P0 CCEFF

Mercury 02 0 Nickel 40 R R-F-73 C7A~] CFpoundgtL ACCOR R TeuroGceuro

Potassium 5000 OOO RROQ zv7 A6 gttf irL

Selenium

Silver 10

Sodium sooo OOO Thallium 10

Vanadium 50 O on CCTPR

Zinc 20 pound O^er 5^ pound3 3R

-Y-ACT mdash ^

atcgf- CAJ

Field DuplicateActions should be applied to ail other samples of thesame matrix type

Actions

If both sample results are less than the CRDL then the field precision is not evaluated If either

sample result is less than 5x the CRDL thefi)J results for elements whose absolute difference is gt

CRDL If both samples results for elements are greater than 5x theCRDL thencalculate theRPD For

aqueous samples J results for elements which have an RPD gt 20 For soil samples J results for

elements whichhave anRPD gt 35

Calculation RPD (A-B) 100

[(A B)2)

NOTE

CRDL Contract RequiredDetection Limit Sample Result

RPD Relative Percent Difference Duplicate Sample Result

January 1988

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation mdash-mdash Data Review Worksheets

VIII LaboratoryControl Sample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample(LCS) analysis wasperformed but did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt30forND

80-120forND+ gt120 for

gt 120 forNO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ - positive result ND - not detected element 1 - When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Oata Validation However detection limits should beestimated when evaluated under a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not requiredof the laboratory

IX Detection LimitResults (Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required DetectionLimits

Detection limit results werenot included inthe data package

Detection limits were presentbut the criteria was not met for the followingelements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detected below the adjusted detection limit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IOL (uql) x Volume dilutedto (ml) x 1L x 1000 am x 1 mq

solids wet weightdigested ltgms) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within +_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviationby themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injectionswere notperformed for thefollowing sampleselements

Action Reject(R) data andnotify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the + 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed asrequired for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency inthe memo

Duplicate injections did not agree within plusmn_ 20 RSD andthe third injection did not agree witheither of the first two injections (+ 20 RSD) for the following sampleselements

Action Approximate (J) data

B Analytical Spike Percent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes were performed for all samplesand thespike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spikerecoveries were less than 10 for the followingsampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results and reject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positiveresults and reject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere lessthan 50 of thespike value and spike recoveries weregrfeater than 40 (Accept data) amps J-c

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of thespike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions should be taken

Method ofStandard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were greater than 0995

Action Acceptdata

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than 099S

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation ^S0L-Data Review Worksheets

VIII Laboratory ControlSample (Form VII)

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysiswas performed for every twenty samples received and met contractual criteria

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) analysis was performedbut did not meet the criteria for the following elements

Calculation R = (ObservedTrue) x 100

Actions

Accept Approximate Reject

Recovery 30-79 for NO1 30-79 for + lt 30for NO 80-120 for NO+ gt 120 for +

gt 120 for NO lt 30 for +

NOTE

+ positive result ND not detectedelement 1 When the percent recovery falls between 30-79 for the LCS an evaluation of detection

limits is beyond the scope of work for a NUSFIT Level I Data Validation However detection limits should be estimated when evaluatedunder a Level II Data Validation

An aqueous LCS mercury sample is not required of the laboratory

IX Detection Limit Results(Form VII)

Instrument detection limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits

Detection limit results werenot included in the data package

Detection limits were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements

Action Adjust sample detection limits for elements not meeting contractual criteria listed above Elements detectedbelow the adjusted detectionlimit should berejected (Rd)

Calculating detection limits for soil samples Sample detectionlimit (mgkg) =

100 x IDL (uql) x Volume dilutedto(mil x x 1000 am 1 mq

solids wet weight digested (gms) 1000ml 1kg 1000 ug

January 1988

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

bullSOINUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

X Furnace Atomic Absorption QC AnalysisMethod of Standard Additions

A Duplicate Injections

Duplicate injections were performed for all samples and agreed within plusmn_ 20 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) The RSD or Coefficient of Variation (CV) is calculated by dividing thestandard deviation by themean and multiplying by one hundered

Duplicate injections werenot performed for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data and notify the NUSFIT RSCC Manager of the deficiency

Duplicate injections were outside the plusmn_ 20 RSD limit and a third injection was not performed as required for the followingsampleselements

Action Approximate(J) data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

Duplicate injections did not agreewithin+20 RSD and the third injection did not agreewith either of thefirst twoinjections(20 RSD) for the following sampieselements

Action Approximate(J) data

B Analytical SpikePercent Recoveries

One-point analytical spikes wereperformed for all samples and the spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria (Accept data)

The analytical spike recoverieswere lessthan 10 for the following sampleselements

Action Reject (R) data

Spike recoveries were 10-40 and the laboratory did not dilute and re-analyze the following sampleselements Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Spike recoveries were 10-40 after the following sampleselements were diluted and re-analyzed Action Approximate(J) positive results andreject (R) non-detected results

Sample Concentrationswere less than 50 of the spike value and spike yfiatiu recoveries weregreater than 40 (Acceptdata) S-eftjnium

Sample Concentrationswere greater than 50 of the spike valueand spike recoveries did not meet the85-115 recovery criteria The following actions shouldbe taken

Method of Standard Addition(MSA) was not performed as required for samplenumberselements _ _

Action Approximate data and summarize the labs deficiency in the memo

January 1988

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

SIILshyNUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

MSA was used to quantitate analytical results for the following sampleselements when correlation coefficients were oreater than 0995 03^ 0W amp V 3 ~ J_ES - 7 laquotion Accept data 7 ^

MSA was performed for the following sampleselements and correlation coefficients were less than0995

Action Approximate (J) data

Comments

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (1CP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sample matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption should not be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percentof the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) r Matrix ACO

Element 101 101X10 Sample

SerialDiluted SampleResult

Action

without OF Times OF

Aluminum

Barium ML oo

poundol 4X7 Beryllium O Cadmium

J- so Calcium 20OO DIAOO~] Cobalt O S0O Copper 2 2Q Chromium

M MM Iron ML MML 41 Lead 22 770 Magnesium

Manganese J2 Ipoundl AT

Nickel ipoundL Potassium

Zplusmn2_ 7970 Silver 0 OO Sodium fvo 9yen0 Vanadium 70 Zinc

ZL 122 O OS Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for thatelement shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

For example 1 The lOLfor Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The

sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 60 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) bull 8 Eight isless than 100 (10 ppb (IDL)x 10) No action is warranted

2 The I0L for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Ai) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sample should be evaluated for matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) 4 (dilution factor) a 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix shouldbe approximated (Jd)

January 1988

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NU5 Corporation shyData Review Worksheets

XI Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) QC AnalysisSerial Dilution Results

Serial dilution analysis enables the reviewer to evaluate whether significant physical or chemical interferences exist due to sampie matrix for samples analyzed by ICP Sample results for elements analyzed and quantitated by Furnace Atomic Absorption shouldnot be evaluated

Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sampie analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis

Serial Dilutions werenot performed for the following

Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 10x the IDL after dilution (785 SOW) The following elements wereevaluated for Matrix interferences

Dilution Factor (DF) Matrix $copylaquo)

Vshy

Serial DilutedSampie Result Sample

Element IDl IDL X10 Action

without OF Times DF

Aluminum 0 O 10 557040 0700 S35oo Barium lt0 357 70 C35cQ Beryllium

Cadmium pound0 Calcium 77 o P-loo tTlogool Mb Cobalt 10 OCraquo ClS-1 [OM SO K)b Copper 13 NI B~ W fc Chromium 1 O 0 0 PS Me Iron

_Q_ 0O iteao tiynoo ACCJBP-F

Lead 77 7 70 Magnesium 40 130Q f4Cgt0 A-ctaf Manganese 3o 97 il 97o Nickel 9Q _iplusmn3_ 9cL HC Potassium 7770 CpopqI 3 9amp0 Jslpound_ Silver o T QO Cgt^ Mb Sodium

Vanadium 2gtpound_ Z35ZZ tb NJpound Zinc 4o ^7f X55~ Other

Actions All data forsamples of the samematrix for that element shouldbe approximated(J) when the serialdilution results donot meet contractual requirements

Forexample ^ The IDL for Mg is 10ppb Magnesium (Mg) was detected in Sample A at a concentration of 65 ppb The sample was then diluted by a factor of ten The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 80 ppb The sample should not be evaluated for matrix interferences since 80 ppb (SR) + 10 (dilution factor) 8 Eight is lessthan 100 (10ppb (IDL) x 10) No action is warranted

2 The IDL for Al is 70 ppb Aluminum (Al) was detected in Sample B at a concentration of 2000 ppb The sample was dilutedby a factor of four The serially diluted sample result (SR) was 3200 ppb The sampleshould be evaluated tor matrix interferences since 3200 ppb (SR) + 4 (dilution factor) raquo 800 Eighthundred is greater than 700 (70 ppb (IDL) x 10) The serially diluted sample result of 3200 ppb is not within 10 of the undiluted sample result of 2000 ppb Therefore aluminum results in all samples of the samematrix should be approximated(Jd)

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) toactual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the lab uses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to500 milliliters(volume dilutedto) then wet weight sample results(mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Dilutedto(mt) IL IOOOgm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested(gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In additionthe results areconverted todry weight using the percent solidscalculation

wet weight sample result (mokg) x 100 = Final Concentration mgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B Percent Solids

It is recommended that percent solids determination be validated 100 due to the impact an error could have on the results foran entire sample

solids = Sample Drv Weight x too Sample Wet Weight

Comments

January 1988

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

NUS Corporation Data Review Worksheets

XII Calculations

A Soil SampleResults

For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugl) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)

If the labuses 1 gm sample (wet weight) to 500 milliliters (volume diluted to) then wet weight sample results (mgkg) are calculated from the following equation

Volume Diluted to (mi) II 1000gm 1 mgDigest Result (ugL) x x x x

Wet Weight Digested (gm) 1000 ml 1kg 1000 ug

In addition the results are converted todry weightusing thepercent solidscalculation

wet weiohtsample result (moka) x 100 = Final Concentrationmgkg (Dry Weight) solids

B PercentSolids

It is recommended that percent solids determinationbe validated 100 due to the impact an error could have onthe results for an entiresample

gt

solids = Sample Dry Weight x too Sample WetWeight

Comments

January 1988

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000004

Page J_ of [amp

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 N N F L H O V T703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-21-KZ

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

MB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NOc)29a^lLltkA

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date -im~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminur

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measure

Low Medium

Soil Sludge

tjjgL^Jr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

O A

IODIL OIL

ZXo J IU SU

T 2 9 Q 1

IOU J3LL

CMJ SIL

Cover Pace Additional ff

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids ( Z )

VS30

Other

lgpoundI

C S 1

13 CV

9LL

797U

SU

LOU JT

19VOLC

JDU

U

C 9 J Z JM

staJdard re3ult qualifiers are aaed as defined on Definitionof silrhf 8^fdegdegtaotaa axplaining results ore encouragedDefinition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Commaa -SAMPLE DESCRIPTION h ) ATF- R CLEM

Lab Manager QASA LJ IFBFB Amendy One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000005

Page 0^ of (a

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 rnftH olt9703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date f

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vyen-$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VSSZZ

Elements Identified and Measured

VConcentration Low Medium

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(^gL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum o H 13 Magnesium C6S91

2 Antimony BOU 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic L O U 15 Mercury AS cv 4 Barii

16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium IK 17 Potassium 797U pound(ltL6 Cadmium

18 Selenium S-LL

7 Calcii C3ovol 19 Silver oq a p

8 Chromium oa 20 Sodium CA9301

9 Cobalt L O U 21 Thallium L O U

10 Copper I 3 U 22 Vanadium TU 11 Iron C331 23 Zinc 9U

12 Lead S~OT Percent Solids() m

Cyanide ND Footnotes

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Definitionof h1^31 V footnotea explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit andcontained oh Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION VV47(ITPAVD QOUgtL^CeuroSlt

Lab Manager

IFB AirfSid One

2

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

jOOpOOG

Page of (g

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 NSO 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt^2-fit

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATFn CASE NObull 1192M7L9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V-S33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^ir mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum IsxllL 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony UK 14 Manganese C H I

3 Arsenic O N 15 Mercury 11

4 Barium ILL 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium ILL 17 Potassit 797U 6 Cadmium SU

18 Selenium SU

7 Calcium IT 19 Silver IOA

8 Chromium Q^ 20 Sodium C3M01

9 Cobalt OLL LTgtU21 Thallium

10 Copper I3LL 22 Vanadium M

11 Iron L3ol 23 Zinc 9u M

12 Lead SU Percent Solids(Z) MR

Cyanide m Footnotes

Coyerepaaein8A^f^ltS sCadard result qualifiers are used as defined on dditional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION )A))TFJ CLpoundM FITJPCOLXILUJpoundSS

Lab Manager_ TfUiJaA-PP

IFB An^n^ One

CV

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

QUQ007

Page y of L

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 ivah osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date yen-2shy

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO1 29 a i 7 M A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~$$

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO V-S3ZL

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

(ugL^r mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum I0I iX- P 13 Magnesium CT ^

2 Antimony loOU 14 Manganese rvI

3 Arsenic OU 15 Mercury S3 cv 4 Barium UI7J 16 Nickel 9U

5 Beryllium 1U 17 Potassium ina 6 Cadmium SIL 18 Selenium STpound

7 Calcium CZSZOl 19 Silver loU n 8 Chromium IO U 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt )QLL 21 Thallium PLC

10 Copper IbUL 22 Vanadium

11 Iron CXQ1 23 Zinc 9u R 12 Lead SOL

Percent Solids (Z) m Cyanide ML Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and Cover Page howeverv laquouwraquo ^oa raquouuai ue cxpiicic ana containedcontained onon Cove

Cogent SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U9Tgg Ctf-Ag fttlpOjQtjalit

Lab Manager P

IFB Amend (J One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

0U00G8

Page of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office

EPA Sample No

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

22313 m ia 053shy

Dace 4-U-X9

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATRD CASE NO 9l9aa7C9A

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS33

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medii

Matrix Water X Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum folU 13 Magnesium INU 2 Antimony Lou 14 Manganese 34

3 Arsenic lou 15 Mercury 35

4 Barium ILL 1116 Nickel

5 Beryllium lot 17 Potassium 191U 6 Cadmium 54 18 Selenium

7 Calcium 296U 19 Silver )ou Ai 8 Chromium O U

20 Sodium l9Uou 9 Cobalt lou 21 Thallium Jo LL 10 Copper 13U 22 Vanadium ML 11 Iron on 23 Zinc 9U amp 12 Lead su

Percent Solids(2) UK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such a-regflags must be explicit and contained Cover Page however anu concainea onon cove

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION hlflTBl A rip(JOLARLpoundSS

cv

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000009

Page_ 6 of Lf Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenone Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mflH 05$ 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date 4-2htt

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED case no 929-2A7C1A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

LAB SAMPLE ID NO bull QC REPORT NO VS22

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

bullMatrix Water Soil Sludge Other

(ugL)gtr mgkg dry weight (Circle One)

1 Aluminum oiu 13 Magnesium

2 Antimony (oOil 14 Manganese csj 3 Arsenic IampU 15 Mercury ic CV

4 Barium cm 16 Nickel 9U 5 Beryllium I_u 17 Potassium 797U 6 Cadmium su 18 Selenium StL 7 Calcium CQQ~7Q~J 19 Silver JQLL U 8 Chromium lou 20 Sodium mou 9 Cobalt ou 21 Thallium occ

10 Copper I3U 22 Vanadium SU

11 Iron can 23 Zinc hi 12 Lead Su Percent Solids(2) KK Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained Cover Page howevermdashbullbull-owwww quu tuumineu onon uovc

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION U)ATpound) AtJP(jOLampRjJzSS

Lab Manager 7idhJPCj IFB AmeKjJ^ One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000004

Page of_M_ Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 03 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date v-a-^y

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 5^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum I 9900 13 Magnesium ^O50

2 Antimony HJH U 14 Manganese lolO

3 Arsenic 13 JhpoundF 15 Mercury OIZ Ubull

4 Barium LX 16 Nickel IS 5 Beryllium C0S2~2 17 Potassium cmJ 6 Cadmium l-su 18 Selenium l i LL

7 Calcium QJoSO 19 Silver 0CCL

8 Chromium XL jtz 20 Sodium SoVU

9 Cobalt CL-Sl 21 Thallium _kU 10 Copper L 22 Vanadium 3O p

11 Iron 2QLQO 23 Zinc TV 12 Lead N Z Percent Solids() 77 Cyanide HR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SniI A MsDiUM

As l=TpoundnAlpoundjgt AT TgtjLJJT)OtJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

CV

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

fHgt0005

Page 3 of V

Form t

U S EPA Conrracc Laboracory Program EPA Sample No Sample Managenenc Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn ovo 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-at

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9m37C9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace ltfgt

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 5^DO P 13 Magnesium Mto

2 Antimony 17 H M 14 Manganese V53 3 Arsenic 13 N s 15 Mercury C) H U_ N lcv

4 Barium fcS 16 Nickel CS31

5 Beryllium CO23 17 Potassium C L Q l O l

6 Cadmium bullVIZ eurogt1-54-jrpc 18 Selenium Mil N F 7 Calcium C 9 2 5 1 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium HL3 bull 20 Sodium 539U

9 Cobalt C473 21 Thallium 2 $ U iJ 10 Copper 15 22 Vanadium IS 11 Iron_2QjOOtLzzki 23 Zinc U3

12 Lead M Percent Solids(Z) 73 Cyanide m Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SplZ- PQampd j Uy

fIs T)t=rBsm^sTgt a- 2X DxutipM

Pfe T)gTggmVg7) Pft lO PILOTS

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000006

PaRe 3 of V Form 1

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 318 - Alexandria VA 22313 flifla mt 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 929Q 31L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Dace 1^shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO ^53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weight^Circle One)

1 Aluminum 3 OQ 13 Magnesium 21VP

2 Antimonv Ni l H 14 Manganese 221 3 Arsenic 10 HSF 15 Mercury Q- i u AJcv

4 Barium H 16 Nickel 12

5 Beryllium r o2v j 17 Potassium CV7SJ 6 Cadmium h2LL 18 Selenium LM N ishy

7 Calcii 22SO 19 Silver 33

8 Chromium 29 -X- P 20 Sodium HSU U 9 Cobalt C281 21 Thallium 29 H A 10 Copper 71 22 Vanadium so 11 Iron ausoo 23 Zinc

12 Lead Lo Percent Solids(Z) pound5

Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soi f - ampLACX IPpoundDi t I tn Pb P6Tpoundgm)laquoJgb AT 10 y bullptLccno^

Lab Manager_ IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000007

Page -V of I1- Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 223L3 man ova 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date__S

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Vj- -9^

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 4531

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(5$kg dry weightyCircle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum Isyoo 13 Magnesium qqoo 2 Antimonv

3 Arsenic

221

n A A

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

21$ Q2 N CV

4 Barium 257 16 Nickel N 5 Beryllium C 03Q1 17 Potassium c i i t o a

6 Cadmium bullD 18 Selenium US u_ 2U 7 Calcium mo 19 Silver 1 o

8 Chromium 3Q r P 20 Sodium 579U

9 Cobalt CWg l 21 Thallium 30U M

10 Copper m 22 Vanadium ao 11 Iron ao9oo P 23 Zinc aas 12 Lead ill M Percent Solids(X) fe7

Cyanide Nlaquo Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol- BpoundOU)Ai f7poundampUAl

Sk PETeemifies AT SA pgtimoN peregmiNeo A-T 1M PILUW

PiS t )ET Bg m iQET-i Per SX bullpiLtrnoAi

Lab Manager

7 IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000008

P a g e v - J o

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 M f tU 043 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9WQ 37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date ~I-- 8$

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum slton 13 Magnesium asso 2 Antimonv lo II ti 14 Manganese Sc9

3 Arsenic M 5F 15 Mercury ofeU A CV 4 Barium 16 Nickel ia 5 Beryllium Cnq~7 l 17 Potassium C7751 6 Cadmium I 3U 18 Selenium 1 iU Ni l shy

7 Calcium 19 Silver 27U

8 Chromium oa r 20 Sodium snu 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium a7a A 10 Copper 19 22 Vanadium 13 11 Iron a i goo 23 Zinc 33 12 Lead 5 A) Percent Solids(Z)

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sp| f_ R toXJ tJbullbull bull vwt l ry

fs T^FTEefniiEB OX OlLU-tion(Pl) DETegTiliUE^ K7 mm-rtail

Lab Manager

S IFB Amend One

000009

Page L of V Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 man oyy703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt1-21-8$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 95f lQ37WA SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO 32

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum ) Lion 13 Magnesium 229o 2 Antimony 11U A 14 Manganese was 3 Arsenic

4 Barii

I9

121 hlSr 15 Mercury

16 Nickel

OJHIA

Clou ACV

5 Beryllium roasi 17 Potassium C7721

6 Cadmium MM 18 Selenium HU A] I

7 Calcium 19 Silver

8 Chromium 22 20 Sodium fgt39U

9 Cobalt 21 Thallium Nl 10 Copper 11 22 Vanadium 11 11 Iron bull235QQ 23 Zinc 1Q9 12 Lead 33 Percent Solids(2) 21 Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL fYlsbiiXm

mdashQX Tgtaupod peTettnmdep vsr Cgt^ THumwZ

Lab Manager

Amend One

I

OUOOIO

Page_ 7 of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 man- os(5 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

D aC V - 2 Z -

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9SMQ37CV A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Itf-

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^(Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum gt0-4gtO 13 Magnesium 1NU

2 Antimony aou- kIi 14 Manganese uoo 3 Arsenic ao N) 15 Mercury o n u Ncv

4 Barium Em 16 Nickel E I 3 1

5 Beryllium Q-S5U shy 17 Potassium E 3Dn

6 Cadmium bull7 U 18 Selenium mi Mr 7 Calcium ES771 19 Silver 331L 8 Chromium )3ltn0 20 Sodium WlU p

9 Cobalt E L-31 21 Thallium aau _N _F

10 Copper MO 22 Vanadium a7 iL P

11 Iron Lonno 23 Zinc

12 Lead I Ns Percent Solids(Z)

v2 To

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soif f BK AHO FNeuro

PI- DETFE rvgt gtrigD (Srr QjC tgt1LOTVOraquoJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000011

Page_ mdashdegtJH_ Form I

U S EPA Conrract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 man OIL 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

IN0RCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 939Q37Cff t SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date VVshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum I S3QQ 13 Magnesium Id70 2 Antimonv ISU Ny 14 Manganese 557 3- Arsenic N 15 Mercury QI IU Nicv 4 Barium 16 Nickel32plusmn 33 5 Beryllium CO^7 17Potassiumi

6 Cadmium II 1 I H18 Selenium

7 Calcium poundbull9337 2 IU19 Silver

8 Chromium 22 JLL 20 Sodium Him 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium ai u 10 Copper l o t 22 Vanadium

11 Iron 26500 23 Zinc Has 12 Lead HI Percent Solids(Z) w Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION So t poundCgtuJaJ t yg - f rmn

AampmdashDEfgftni 1 MET) AT VX DILU-NXW Arr 1CiX P ILOTLOFTT

Lab Manager

IftJ Amend One

000012

Page_ 9-laquoJL Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y(W PHI 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO o3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum LCU3Q 13 Magnesium 32A0 2 Antimony m A 14 Manganese 513 3 Arsenic 15 hi 15 Mercurv oiau A cv 4 Barium U3 16 Nickel 14 5 Beryllium 17 Potassium ET IsitaT3

6 Cadmium AO 18 Selenium

7 Calcii 19 Silver

8 Chromium 3J Jtz 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt r 5-2~i 21 Thallium QMU iJ 10 Copper 31 22 Vanadium bullX7 11 Iron 1 97OO 23 Zinc A3 12 Lead A3 N Percent Solids(Z) H Cyanide NK Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol BgOfrJv M^biUT)

xgtpoundTggp- tfjgfr AT 10)6 piumo^shy

000013

Page Qof V

Form T

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~^~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Low X Medium

Soil Sludge_

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^(Circle One)

ML M MU V nlti

bull a t shy

30Q

II P

C3S3 laso

ro N5 F

NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

^531

Other

l is OJ2LL N cv

C733

C3IS1 A ) f

lVUL

OMU A e g 7 1

2V

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sni_ Pgtpound(XJaJJ GdAttr

Lab Manager V6U( IFB Amend One

000014

Page of V

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MA hi CSV 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATE CASE NO q-m37C9 A SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Dace V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

laquo8L or figkg dry weighcVCirde One)

1 Aluminum i afano p 13 Magnesium -736P 2 Antimony ruL H F 14 Manganese 193 3 Arsenic 5a 15 Mercurv GI9LL Acv 4 Barium UJJ1 16 Nickel 23

5 Beryllium 029LL 17 Potassium CS7YJ 6 Cadmium i qu 18 Selenium l Yd As 7 Calcium as3o 19 Silver

8 Chromium 03 p 20 Sodium 5L1U 9 Cobalt CjoMl 21 Thallium a9 tc hi F 10 Copper sv 22 Vanadium a 11 Iron Q3QQ 23 Zinc

12 Lead 96 fl Percent Solids(Z) (o Cyanide NR Footnotes

itfPA Stadard rfiSult laquoe used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3foxW

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

I

OUOOIO

Page_ 7 of

Form I

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 man- os(5 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

D aC V - 2 Z -

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9SMQ37CV A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date Itf-

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO V53

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

ugL or figkg dry weight^(Circle One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum gt0-4gtO 13 Magnesium 1NU

2 Antimony aou- kIi 14 Manganese uoo 3 Arsenic ao N) 15 Mercury o n u Ncv

4 Barium Em 16 Nickel E I 3 1

5 Beryllium Q-S5U shy 17 Potassium E 3Dn

6 Cadmium bull7 U 18 Selenium mi Mr 7 Calcium ES771 19 Silver 331L 8 Chromium )3ltn0 20 Sodium WlU p

9 Cobalt E L-31 21 Thallium aau _N _F

10 Copper MO 22 Vanadium a7 iL P

11 Iron Lonno 23 Zinc

12 Lead I Ns Percent Solids(Z)

v2 To

Cyanide NR Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Soif f BK AHO FNeuro

PI- DETFE rvgt gtrigD (Srr QjC tgt1LOTVOraquoJ

Lab Manager

IFB Amend One

000011

Page_ mdashdegtJH_ Form I

U S EPA Conrract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 man OIL 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

IN0RCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 939Q37Cff t SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date VVshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum I S3QQ 13 Magnesium Id70 2 Antimonv ISU Ny 14 Manganese 557 3- Arsenic N 15 Mercury QI IU Nicv 4 Barium 16 Nickel32plusmn 33 5 Beryllium CO^7 17Potassiumi

6 Cadmium II 1 I H18 Selenium

7 Calcium poundbull9337 2 IU19 Silver

8 Chromium 22 JLL 20 Sodium Him 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium ai u 10 Copper l o t 22 Vanadium

11 Iron 26500 23 Zinc Has 12 Lead HI Percent Solids(Z) w Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION So t poundCgtuJaJ t yg - f rmn

AampmdashDEfgftni 1 MET) AT VX DILU-NXW Arr 1CiX P ILOTLOFTT

Lab Manager

IftJ Amend One

000012

Page_ 9-laquoJL Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y(W PHI 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO o3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum LCU3Q 13 Magnesium 32A0 2 Antimony m A 14 Manganese 513 3 Arsenic 15 hi 15 Mercurv oiau A cv 4 Barium U3 16 Nickel 14 5 Beryllium 17 Potassium ET IsitaT3

6 Cadmium AO 18 Selenium

7 Calcii 19 Silver

8 Chromium 3J Jtz 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt r 5-2~i 21 Thallium QMU iJ 10 Copper 31 22 Vanadium bullX7 11 Iron 1 97OO 23 Zinc A3 12 Lead A3 N Percent Solids(Z) H Cyanide NK Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol BgOfrJv M^biUT)

xgtpoundTggp- tfjgfr AT 10)6 piumo^shy

000013

Page Qof V

Form T

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~^~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Low X Medium

Soil Sludge_

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^(Circle One)

ML M MU V nlti

bull a t shy

30Q

II P

C3S3 laso

ro N5 F

NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

^531

Other

l is OJ2LL N cv

C733

C3IS1 A ) f

lVUL

OMU A e g 7 1

2V

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sni_ Pgtpound(XJaJJ GdAttr

Lab Manager V6U( IFB Amend One

000014

Page of V

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MA hi CSV 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATE CASE NO q-m37C9 A SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Dace V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

laquo8L or figkg dry weighcVCirde One)

1 Aluminum i afano p 13 Magnesium -736P 2 Antimony ruL H F 14 Manganese 193 3 Arsenic 5a 15 Mercurv GI9LL Acv 4 Barium UJJ1 16 Nickel 23

5 Beryllium 029LL 17 Potassium CS7YJ 6 Cadmium i qu 18 Selenium l Yd As 7 Calcium as3o 19 Silver

8 Chromium 03 p 20 Sodium 5L1U 9 Cobalt CjoMl 21 Thallium a9 tc hi F 10 Copper sv 22 Vanadium a 11 Iron Q3QQ 23 Zinc

12 Lead 96 fl Percent Solids(Z) (o Cyanide NR Footnotes

itfPA Stadard rfiSult laquoe used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3foxW

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

000011

Page_ mdashdegtJH_ Form I

U S EPA Conrract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 man OIL 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Dace

IN0RCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 939Q37Cff t SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date VVshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL or(mgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum I S3QQ 13 Magnesium Id70 2 Antimonv ISU Ny 14 Manganese 557 3- Arsenic N 15 Mercury QI IU Nicv 4 Barium 16 Nickel32plusmn 33 5 Beryllium CO^7 17Potassiumi

6 Cadmium II 1 I H18 Selenium

7 Calcium poundbull9337 2 IU19 Silver

8 Chromium 22 JLL 20 Sodium Him 9 Cobalt 21 Thallium ai u 10 Copper l o t 22 Vanadium

11 Iron 26500 23 Zinc Has 12 Lead HI Percent Solids(Z) w Cyanide NR Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION So t poundCgtuJaJ t yg - f rmn

AampmdashDEfgftni 1 MET) AT VX DILU-NXW Arr 1CiX P ILOTLOFTT

Lab Manager

IftJ Amend One

000012

Page_ 9-laquoJL Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y(W PHI 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO o3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum LCU3Q 13 Magnesium 32A0 2 Antimony m A 14 Manganese 513 3 Arsenic 15 hi 15 Mercurv oiau A cv 4 Barium U3 16 Nickel 14 5 Beryllium 17 Potassium ET IsitaT3

6 Cadmium AO 18 Selenium

7 Calcii 19 Silver

8 Chromium 3J Jtz 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt r 5-2~i 21 Thallium QMU iJ 10 Copper 31 22 Vanadium bullX7 11 Iron 1 97OO 23 Zinc A3 12 Lead A3 N Percent Solids(Z) H Cyanide NK Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol BgOfrJv M^biUT)

xgtpoundTggp- tfjgfr AT 10)6 piumo^shy

000013

Page Qof V

Form T

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~^~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Low X Medium

Soil Sludge_

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^(Circle One)

ML M MU V nlti

bull a t shy

30Q

II P

C3S3 laso

ro N5 F

NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

^531

Other

l is OJ2LL N cv

C733

C3IS1 A ) f

lVUL

OMU A e g 7 1

2V

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sni_ Pgtpound(XJaJJ GdAttr

Lab Manager V6U( IFB Amend One

000014

Page of V

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MA hi CSV 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATE CASE NO q-m37C9 A SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Dace V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

laquo8L or figkg dry weighcVCirde One)

1 Aluminum i afano p 13 Magnesium -736P 2 Antimony ruL H F 14 Manganese 193 3 Arsenic 5a 15 Mercurv GI9LL Acv 4 Barium UJJ1 16 Nickel 23

5 Beryllium 029LL 17 Potassium CS7YJ 6 Cadmium i qu 18 Selenium l Yd As 7 Calcium as3o 19 Silver

8 Chromium 03 p 20 Sodium 5L1U 9 Cobalt CjoMl 21 Thallium a9 tc hi F 10 Copper sv 22 Vanadium a 11 Iron Q3QQ 23 Zinc

12 Lead 96 fl Percent Solids(Z) (o Cyanide NR Footnotes

itfPA Stadard rfiSult laquoe used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3foxW

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

000012

Page_ 9-laquoJL Form t

U S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y(W PHI 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO o3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCircle One)

1 Aluminum LCU3Q 13 Magnesium 32A0 2 Antimony m A 14 Manganese 513 3 Arsenic 15 hi 15 Mercurv oiau A cv 4 Barium U3 16 Nickel 14 5 Beryllium 17 Potassium ET IsitaT3

6 Cadmium AO 18 Selenium

7 Calcii 19 Silver

8 Chromium 3J Jtz 20 Sodium

9 Cobalt r 5-2~i 21 Thallium QMU iJ 10 Copper 31 22 Vanadium bullX7 11 Iron 1 97OO 23 Zinc A3 12 Lead A3 N Percent Solids(Z) H Cyanide NK Footnotes For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sol BgOfrJv M^biUT)

xgtpoundTggp- tfjgfr AT 10)6 piumo^shy

000013

Page Qof V

Form T

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~^~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Low X Medium

Soil Sludge_

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^(Circle One)

ML M MU V nlti

bull a t shy

30Q

II P

C3S3 laso

ro N5 F

NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

^531

Other

l is OJ2LL N cv

C733

C3IS1 A ) f

lVUL

OMU A e g 7 1

2V

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sni_ Pgtpound(XJaJJ GdAttr

Lab Manager V6U( IFB Amend One

000014

Page of V

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MA hi CSV 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATE CASE NO q-m37C9 A SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Dace V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

laquo8L or figkg dry weighcVCirde One)

1 Aluminum i afano p 13 Magnesium -736P 2 Antimony ruL H F 14 Manganese 193 3 Arsenic 5a 15 Mercurv GI9LL Acv 4 Barium UJJ1 16 Nickel 23

5 Beryllium 029LL 17 Potassium CS7YJ 6 Cadmium i qu 18 Selenium l Yd As 7 Calcium as3o 19 Silver

8 Chromium 03 p 20 Sodium 5L1U 9 Cobalt CjoMl 21 Thallium a9 tc hi F 10 Copper sv 22 Vanadium a 11 Iron Q3QQ 23 Zinc

12 Lead 96 fl Percent Solids(Z) (o Cyanide NR Footnotes

itfPA Stadard rfiSult laquoe used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3foxW

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

000013

Page Qof V

Form T

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 mn osi 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~^~

LAB SAMPLE ID NO

Concentration

Matrix Water

1 Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

QC REPORT NO

Elements Identified and Measured

Low X Medium

Soil Sludge_

ugL orfmgkg dry weight^(Circle One)

ML M MU V nlti

bull a t shy

30Q

II P

C3S3 laso

ro N5 F

NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

^531

Other

l is OJ2LL N cv

C733

C3IS1 A ) f

lVUL

OMU A e g 7 1

2V

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sni_ Pgtpound(XJaJJ GdAttr

Lab Manager V6U( IFB Amend One

000014

Page of V

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MA hi CSV 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATE CASE NO q-m37C9 A SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Dace V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

laquo8L or figkg dry weighcVCirde One)

1 Aluminum i afano p 13 Magnesium -736P 2 Antimony ruL H F 14 Manganese 193 3 Arsenic 5a 15 Mercurv GI9LL Acv 4 Barium UJJ1 16 Nickel 23

5 Beryllium 029LL 17 Potassium CS7YJ 6 Cadmium i qu 18 Selenium l Yd As 7 Calcium as3o 19 Silver

8 Chromium 03 p 20 Sodium 5L1U 9 Cobalt CjoMl 21 Thallium a9 tc hi F 10 Copper sv 22 Vanadium a 11 Iron Q3QQ 23 Zinc

12 Lead 96 fl Percent Solids(Z) (o Cyanide NR Footnotes

itfPA Stadard rfiSult laquoe used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3foxW

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

000014

Page of V

Form I

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No

Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MA hi CSV 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATE CASE NO q-m37C9 A SOW NO 785

Lab Receipt Dace V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low ^ Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge Other

laquo8L or figkg dry weighcVCirde One)

1 Aluminum i afano p 13 Magnesium -736P 2 Antimony ruL H F 14 Manganese 193 3 Arsenic 5a 15 Mercurv GI9LL Acv 4 Barium UJJ1 16 Nickel 23

5 Beryllium 029LL 17 Potassium CS7YJ 6 Cadmium i qu 18 Selenium l Yd As 7 Calcium as3o 19 Silver

8 Chromium 03 p 20 Sodium 5L1U 9 Cobalt CjoMl 21 Thallium a9 tc hi F 10 Copper sv 22 Vanadium a 11 Iron Q3QQ 23 Zinc

12 Lead 96 fl Percent Solids(Z) (o Cyanide NR Footnotes

itfPA Stadard rfiSult laquoe used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3foxW

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

01)0015

Form t

Page S of V

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313

EPA Sample No

fY]fi hi OSS 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date V-qgg

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37L9 A SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V~Vshy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT m__VS3]__

Concentration

Matrix Water

I Aluminum

2 Antimony

3 Arsenic

4 Barium

5 Beryllium

6 Cadmium

7 Calcium

8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

11 Iron

12 Lead

Cyanide Footnotes

Elements Identified and Measured

Low y Medium

Soil Sludge

ugL or figkg dry weight^CCircle One)

ioaoo

53u JL nI f

C5 IU

oia M3U

C 27SOI7 bulljf p

3 72

LL I gt70Q

28 NJ NR

13 Magnesium

14 Manganese

15 Mercury

16 Nickel

17 Potassium

18 Selenium

19 Silver

20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

23 Zinc

Percent Solids(Z)

Other

vs o

172 OV2gtU Cg71 r ^oii 930

S7U

) f c 9 o 2

S7U

(71911 S7

53

P

NT

tvl

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION S o pound gt g O f r V V i FihJE

Lab Manager

cv

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

000016

Page 3 of V

Form t

0 S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample NoSample Management Office

P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 MftU OSl=703557-2490 FTS 8-55742490

Dace t-l-lhW

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO_ 922Q37LV I

SOW NO 785 Lab Receipt Date V-shy

LAB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT H0_VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low V Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge_ Other

laquogL or figkg -dry weight^(Circle One)

Percent Solids(Z) 39

1 Aluminum Vo 13 Magnesium 3390 2 Antimony am b 14 Manganese 133 3 Arsenic bull5ia N 15 Mercury OILU kl CV

4 Barii 16 Nickel cyai

5 Beryllium cflsn 17 Potassium CVSJ 6 Cadmium 2L(oU 18 Selenium QUI Nl Ishy

7 Calcii 19 Silver 5JU

8 Chromium yenc 20 Sodium 995(1 9 Cobalt

10 Copper

sia

Una 21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

SAIL N

11 Iron IP9 o o 23 Zinc Vs 12 Lead hL Cyanide NR Footnotes

S^epa^ln8Addilaquooni0ffPA Stanard result ltltuallflers used as defined on f dlJ11 83 fr footnotes explaining results are encouraged

Definition of such flags oust be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comnients SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 5sngtZ_ FJf=

Lab Manager I ~~ ^FBAmendT One

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL

000017

Page Vo f V

Form I

II S EPA Contract Laboratory Program EPA Sample No Sample Management Office P 0 Bos 818 - Alexandria VA 22313 (Y)f)H 057 703557-2490 FTS 8-557-2490

Date lt-1-11-$

INORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

UB NAME ANALYTICA INCORPORATED CASE NO 9MQ37C9A SOW NO 785 y-y-Lab Receipt Date

UB SAMPLE ID NO QC REPORT NO VS3

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration Low X Medium

Matrix Water Soil Sludge^ Otherbull2C

ugL orfmgkg dry weightyCirde One)

For reporting results to EPA standard result qualifiers are used as defined on

1 Aluminum 99on 13 Magnesium ULIaO 2 Antimony I5LL 14 Manganese

3 Arsenic SL Js 15 Mercury O I3U Kiev 4 Barium C S I 16 Nickel 19 5 Beryllium 025U 17 Potassium C 5 7 Q 3

6 Cadmium -3C6 18 Selenium i ampq Klishy7 Calcium 2oSO 19 Silver OSLL 8 Chromium

9 Cobalt

10 Copper

19 52 9gt(o

yenr 20 Sodium

21 Thallium

22 Vanadium

99)U 25u

7 iJ

11 Iron 790O 23 Zinc va 12 Lead JL JsL Percent Solids(X)

Cyanide NK Footnotes

Cover Page Additional flags or footnotes explaining results are encouraged Definition of such flags must be explicit and contained on Cover Page however

Comments SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SoiL