2
M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E To / Destinataire Mayor and Members of Council File/N° de fichier From / Expéditeur Michael Mizzi Acting General Manager Planning and Growth Management Department Subject / Objet Ontario Municipal Board Decision – Official Plan Amendment 117 – Centretown Community Design Plan Date: 19 May 2015 The purpose of this memorandum is to inform you that the City of Ottawa has filed for an Ontario Divisional Court Judicial Review of a recent Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) decision on aspects of Official Plan Amendment 117, which implements the Centretown Community Design Plan (CDP). The Centretown CDP was approved by Council in May 2013 and several appeals of OPA 117 were heard by the OMB last fall. Last week, the OMB released its ruling, which upheld several aspects of OPA 117, but struck down others. For the last number of years, beginning with the 2012 Planning Summit and continuing through development and adoption of the most recent Official Plan amendment, the goal of City Council has been to provide certainty with respect to what kinds of development can be done where, in particular, when it comes to direction on height. Through a series of approvals and directions, the City of Ottawa has taken the position that residents should be able to know what the future of their neighbourhoods will be, and developers should be able to know what they can build and where they can build it in order to do business planning appropriately. Working with the community and the development industry, this principle of certainty has been diligently worked into the City’s Official Plan, its Secondary Plans, multiple CDPs and into the Zoning By-law. In the OPA 117 case, the OMB ruled that the City of Ottawa’s Official Plan and its Secondary Plans should not be used to prescribe maximum heights for development, and that these documents need to be flexible on what can be built in what locations. This decision works to undermine the principle of certainty the City of Ottawa has been striving to achieve, and I have been advised that in the opinion of the City’s City Clerk and Solicitor Department, the OMB is wrong in law. Therefore, after consulting with the Mayor, the Chair of the Planning Committee, and the Somerset Ward Councillor, I have been advised that the City Clerk and Solicitor Department has filed an appeal of the OMB ruling with the Divisional Court of Ontario.

Memo - Ontario Municipal Board Decision - Official Plan Amendment 117 - Centretown Community Design Plan_EN

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Memo - Ontario Municipal Board Decision - Official Plan Amendment 117 - Centretown Community Design Plan_EN - May 19, 2015

Citation preview

  • M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E

    To / Destinataire Mayor and Members of Council File/N de fichier From / Expditeur Michael Mizzi

    Acting General ManagerPlanning and Growth Management

    DepartmentSubject / Objet Ontario Municipal Board Decision

    Official Plan Amendment 117 Centretown Community Design Plan

    Date: 19 May 2015

    The purpose of this memorandum is to inform you that the City of Ottawa has filed for an Ontario Divisional Court Judicial Review of a recent Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) decision on aspects of Official Plan Amendment 117, which implements the Centretown Community Design Plan (CDP).

    The Centretown CDP was approved by Council in May 2013 and several appeals of OPA 117 were heard by the OMB last fall. Last week, the OMB released its ruling, which upheld several aspects of OPA 117, but struck down others.

    For the last number of years, beginning with the 2012 Planning Summit and continuing through development and adoption of the most recent Official Plan amendment, the goal of City Council has been to provide certainty with respect to what kinds of development can be done where, in particular, when it comes to direction on height.

    Through a series of approvals and directions, the City of Ottawa has taken the position that residents should be able to know what the future of their neighbourhoods will be, and developers should be able to know what they can build and where they can build it in order to do business planning appropriately. Working with the community and the development industry, this principle of certainty has been diligently worked into the Citys Official Plan, its Secondary Plans, multiple CDPs and into the Zoning By-law.

    In the OPA 117 case, the OMB ruled that the City of Ottawas Official Plan and its Secondary Plans should not be used to prescribe maximum heights for development, and that these documents need to be flexible on what can be built in what locations.

    This decision works to undermine the principle of certainty the City of Ottawa has been striving to achieve, and I have been advised that in the opinion of the Citys City Clerk and Solicitor Department, the OMB is wrong in law. Therefore, after consulting with the Mayor, the Chair of the Planning Committee, and the Somerset Ward Councillor, I have been advised that the City Clerk and Solicitor Department has filed an appeal of the OMB ruling with the Divisional Court of Ontario.

  • We will keep you informed on the progress of this appeal. If you have any questions, please contact me.

    Original signed by:

    Michael Mizzi

    M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C EMayor and Members of CouncilMichael MizziActing General ManagerPlanning and Growth Management DepartmentOntario Municipal Board Decision Official Plan Amendment 117 Centretown Community Design Plan