Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MEMO
DATE: November 29, 2019
PROJECT NO: 04-19-0091
PROJECT: Island Rail Corridor Condition Assessment
SUBJECT: Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) - Draft for Review
TO: Ben Prashaw, P.Eng.
WSP Canada Group Inc.
PREPARED BY: Simon Button, P.Eng.
REVIEWED BY: Floris van Weelderen, P.Eng, PE, PTOE
SUMMARY
• Bunt & Associates Engineering Ltd (Bunt) was retained by WSP Canada Group Inc. (WSP) to
assess the condition of the Island Rail Corridor’s 236 grade crossings and to identify the
required improvements (and costs) to reinstate regular train service for the BC Ministry of
Transportation and Infrastructure (MoTI).
• The average condition rating for each of the six study segments was assessed to be near 3
(Adequate) on a scale of 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) suggesting that the condition of the grade
crossings can generally be defined as adequate.
• Although the overall conditions of the grade crossings are generally adequate, about $42
million +/- 30 percent (= $35 million for the Victoria Sub + $7 million for the Port Alberni Sub)
would be needed to address deficiencies noted during the field investigations/audits. These
improvements would permit the railway operations envisioned for the Initial Phase, i.e. an
average of six trains per day traveling at a maximum speed of 30 mph.
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Island Rail Corridor Condition Assessment project is to assess the condition of
the Island Rail Corridor and to identify the required improvements (and costs) to reinstate regular
train service. As part of the project, Bunt was retained by WSP to complete a condition assessment
of the railway’s grade crossings for the BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MoTI).
1.1 Island Rail Corridor
The E&N Railway of Vancouver Island is a provincially-regulated short line railway that consists of
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 2
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
two subdivisions: a 225 km track between Victoria and Courtenay (Victoria Sub), with a 64 km
branch line (Port Alberni Sub) from Parksville to Port Alberni and from just south of Nanaimo to the
railway’s main rail yard and barge slip (dock) on the Nanaimo waterfront (see Figure 1.1). The
railway is owned by the Island Corridor Foundation (ICF) and operated under contract by the
Southern Railway of Vancouver Island (SVI).
For the purposes of this assignment, the E&N Railway of Vancouver Island will be referred to as the
“Island Rail Corridor”.
Figure 1.1: Island Rail Corridor (Source: IBI Group)
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 3
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
1.2 Grade Crossings
A grade crossing is an intersection where a road, a sidewalk, a path or a trail crosses railway tracks
at the same level.
Table 1.1 summarizes the results of Bunt & Associates’ June 2019 inventory of the Island Rail
Corridor’s grade crossings which are distributed across Vancouver Island as illustrated in Figure
1.2.
Table 1.1: Grade Crossing Inventory of the Island Rail Corridor (June 2019)
PROTECTION VICTORIA SUB PORT ALBERNI SUB TOTAL
Public
Active – FLBG 16 - 16
Active – FLB 85 8 93
Passive 53 11 64
Subtotal 154 19 173
Private
Active – FLBG 1 - 1
Active – FLB 2 - 2
Passive 46 14 60
Subtotal 49 14 63
TOTAL 203 33 236
Notes: Public grade crossings - Where railway tracks intersect with a road that is owned, open and
maintained by a public authority, such as a province, municipality or band council, and is used by the
general public.
Private grade crossings - Where railway tracks intersect with a road that is owned and used by private
parties, such as farmers, commercial businesses or private individuals.
FLBG – Flashing Lights, Bells & Gates; FLB – Flashing Lights & Bells
Key findings and insights include:
• There are currently 236 grade crossings (= 173 public + 63 private) on the Island Rail Corridor;
• Most active crossings (equipped with flashing lights, bells and potentially gates to provide
advance notice of the approach of a train) are on the longer Victoria Sub (104 out of 112 active
crossings); and
• There are a few more passive public crossings (64) than passive private crossings (60) both of
which use traffic control devices (e.g. warning and potentially Stop signs) to indicate the
presence of a railway crossing.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 4
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Figure 1.2: Grade Crossings of the Island Rail Corridor by Type
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 5
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Furthermore, the two subdivisions are broken down into the following segments (illustrated in
Figure 1.3) to inform potential restoration and enhancement options of the Island Rail Corridor:
• Segment 1 - Victoria Sub: Victoria (Mile 0.0) to Langford (Mile 7.9)
• Segment 2 - Victoria Sub: Langford (Mile 7.9) to Duncan (Mile 39.7)
• Segment 3 - Victoria Sub: Duncan (Mile 39.7) to Nanaimo (Mile 72.5)
• Segment 4 - Victoria Sub: Nanaimo (Mile 72.5) to Parksville (Mile 95.2)
• Segment 5 - Victoria Sub: Parksville (Mile 95.2) to Courtenay (Mile 139.7)
• Segment 6 – Port Alberni Sub: Parksville (Mile 0.0) to Port Alberni (Mile 37.9)
Note that the design standards differ between public and private grade crossings. Furthermore, the
crossings are found in a mix of urban, suburban, industrial and rural locations and come in all types
and sizes from unmarked passive crossings to active crossing equipped with flashing lights, bells
and gates).
1.3 Proposed Improvements to the Island Rail Corridor
Table 1.2 summarizes the improvements proposed for the Island Rail Corridor.
Table 1.2: Proposed Improvements to the Island Rail Corridor
CHARACTERISTIC
INITIAL
PHASE
INTERMEDIATE
PHASE
ULTIMATE
PHASE
Description
Class 2 track standard
restoration for
segments 1-6
Class 3 track standard
restoration and 286 lb
rail upgrade for
segments 1-6
Ballast program for
segments 1-6
User Case
• 2-4 passenger
trains/d
• 2-4 freight trains/d
with 10-20 cars/ train
• 4-8 passenger
trains/d
• 4 freight trains/d
with 10-20 cars/ train
• Up to 4 MTPA or 133
cars/d day total
(1)
• To be implemented
for higher passenger
volumes, e.g. > 8
passenger trains/d
• Higher freight
volumes, e.g. > 4
MTPA or 133 cars/d
(2)
Track Standard
Class 2
(25 mph Freight,
30 mph Passenger)
Class 3
(40 mph Freight,
60 mph Passenger)
Class 3
(40 mph Freight,
60 mph Passenger)
Notes: MPTA – million tons per annum
1 - Once passenger/freight train volumes increase above Initial User Case or higher operating speeds are desired,
further upgrades may be necessary. Assumes improvements for Initial Phase have already been completed.
2 - Assumes improvements for Intermediate Phase have already been completed.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 6
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Figure 1.3: Grade Crossings of the Island Rail Corridor by Segment
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 7
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
2. APPROACH
2.1 MoTI’s Objective and Intent
The objective of the Island Rail Corridor Condition Assessment is to complete a detailed evaluation
of the base asset condition of the Victoria and Port Alberni Subs by December 2019. The
assessment of physical plant and the right-of-way includes amongst other things, grade crossings.
There are numerous past reports that detail the condition assessment of the corridor including the
grade crossings and identify required repairs to restore the line. It is the MoTI’s intent that the WSP
team use the past work by the Province and the ICF and undertake the appropriate level of effort
needed to determine the current condition of the corridor.
2.2 WSP’s Approach
WSP’s approach and methodology contains seven (7) phases. Each phase builds off the previous
one, and the approach minimized risk, cost, and project duration. WSP fielded three teams to
assess the condition of the:
• Tracks - road bed; track, yards; sidings; fencing; wire crossings and other clearances; pipe
crossings; and culverts;
• Structures - bridges, trestles, and rockfall; and
• Grade crossings (Bunt).
2.3 Bunt’s Methodology
It is not in the best interest of the Ministry and ICF to assess every crossing for the purposes of this
project as these organizations need information to make business case decisions. To that end, Bunt
relied on data about the crossings along the corridor available in existing plans, reports and
studies.
To provide a valid condition rating and cost estimate, Bunt assessed 75 of the 236 grade crossings
to create a statistically valid sampling of crossings that give a good representation of the 1) full
network length, 2) various segments, 3) passive/active, and 4) rural/urban. Field investigations were
completed for these 75 grade crossings. The grade crossings chosen were proportional to the type
of access, type of protection, crossing surface, segment and rural/urban landscape (see Figure 2.1
and refer to Appendix A for the list of the 75 grade crossings). Field investigations were not
completed at crossings:
• That were recently upgraded with flashing lights, bells and gates;
• That are private crossings for which no google or Streetview imagery is available; and
• That are spurs and industrial leads as there are so few.
The overall condition and rehabilitation cost of the 236 grade crossings was then estimated based
on the condition of the 75 grade crossings for which a field investigation was completed.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 8
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Figure 2.1: Grade Crossings subject to Field Investigation / Audit
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 9
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
2.4 Grade Crossing Components
Table 2.1 presents the six grade crossing components inspected as part of the condition
assessment. The component and sub-component classification is based upon Transport Canada’s
Grade Crossing Regulations (2014) and Grade Crossing Standards (2014) that provide standards for
the classification of grade crossing components and related site characteristics customized in
certain respects to address features common to the Island Rail Corridor.
Table 2.1: Grade Crossing Component and Sub-Component Definitions
ID# COMPONENT SUB-COMPONENTS
A. Crossing Surface
Material
Dimensions
Crossing Angle
B. Road Approach Material
Gradient
C. Warning System
Reflectorized Crossing Sign
Flashing Lights
Cantilever
Bells
Gates
D. Traffic Control Devices
Number of Tracks sign
Stop sign
Stop Ahead sign
Railway Crossing Ahead sign
Advisory Speed Tab sign
Prepare to Stop at Railway Crossing sign
Traffic signal
E. Fencing and Gates Fence
Gate
F Sight Distance
Stopping Sight Distance (SSD)
D SSD
D Stopped
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 10
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
2.5 Condition Ratings
Customized Condition Rating Descriptions have been prepared for each of the subcomponents to
be assessed. They address specialized assets or conditions, incorporating existing practices and
data, and/or leveraging more detailed data collected by the MoTI or SVI.
These ratings and descriptions were used as a guide when assigning a score to the individual
components as they were rated. Table 2.2 details the condition rating scale which is categorical;
only integer values on the scale are defined. Note that a grade crossing is deemed to be in good
repair if it has a rating of 3, 4 or 5 on this scale. Likewise, a grade crossing is deemed to be not in
good repair if it has a rating of 1 or 2. Appendix B presents the rating scales used for each
component.
Table 2.2: General Condition Assessment Rating Scale
RATING CONDITION DESCRIPTION
5 Excellent No visible defects, new or near new condition, may still be under warranty if applicable
4 Good Good condition, but no longer new, may have some slightly defective or deteriorated
component(s), but is overall functional
3 Adequate Moderately deteriorated or defective components, but has not exceeded useful life
2 Marginal Defective or deteriorated component(s) in need of replacement; exceeded useful life
1 Poor Critically damaged component(s) or in need of immediate repair; well past useful life
Note: An asset is deemed to be in good repair if it has a rating of 3, 4 or 5 on this scale. Likewise, an asset is deemed to be
not in good repair if it has a rating of 1 or 2.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 11
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
3. CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND RESULTS
3.1 Field Reports
Appendix C contains the field reports of the 75 grade crossings for which a grade crossing field
investigation was completed.
3.2 Overall Condition by Segment
Table 3.1 summarizes the average condition rating for each of the six study segments which were
all near 3.0 suggesting that the existing condition of the grade crossings can generally be defined
as adequate. This also indicates that the condition of the grade crossings does not have a
significant geographical distribution.
Table 3.1: Grade Crossing Conditions by Segment
SEGMENT NO. OF
CROSSINGS
AVERAGE
CONDITION RATING
1 - Victoria Sub - Victoria (Mile 0.0) to Langford (Mile 7.9) 20 3.0
2 - Victoria Sub - Langford (Mile 7.9) to Duncan (Mile 39.7) 28 3.0
3 - Victoria Sub - Duncan (Mile 39.7) to Nanaimo (Mile 72.5) 61 3.0
4 - Victoria Sub - Nanaimo (Mile 72.5) to Parksville (Mile 95.2) 38 3.0
5 - Victoria Sub – Parksville (Mile 95.2) to Courtenay (Mile 139.7) 56 2.9
Victoria Sub 203 3.0
6 – Port Alberni Sub - Parksville (Mile 0.0) to Port Alberni (Mile 37.9) 33 2.9
ISLAND RAIL CORRIDOR 236 3.0
Note: The grade crossings in a segment are generally deemed to be in good repair if the segment has a rating of 3,
4 or 5. Likewise, grade crossings in a segment are generally deemed to be not in good repair if it has a rating
of 1 or 2.
3.3 Overall Condition by Warning System (Passive/Active)
The average condition of the grade crossings is also consistent between the type of warning
system. The average condition ratings by warning system are:
• Passive: 2.9
• Active (Flashing Lights and Bells): 3.0
• Active (Flashing Lights, Bells and Gates): 3.1
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 12
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
3.4 Overall Condition by Component
Figure 3.1 illustrates the average condition rating for each of the components, with the three
sightline requirements separated out due to their significant cost implications.
Notes: A component is deemed to be in good repair if it has a rating of 3, 4 or 5. Likewise, a component is deemed to be not in
good repair if it has a rating of 1 or 2. SSD – Stopping Sight Distance D - Distance
Figure 3.1: Grade Crossing Conditions by Component
The components with the lowest average condition ratings include the road approaches (2.8) as well
as all three sightlines (SSD = 2.8, D SSD = 2.6, D Stopped = 2.8) which are primarily related to the
road approaches outside of the rail right-of-way.
2.9 2.8 2.93.3 3.2
2.7 2.8 2.6 2.8
11.6
1 1
2
1 1 1 1
4.7
3.8 4
5
4
5
3.3
5
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
Co
nd
itio
n R
atin
g
Component
Average Rating Lowest Rating Highest Rating
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 13
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
4. REHABILITATION REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Grade Crossing Assessments
The rehabilitation requirements were determined by identifying improvements needed to bring each
crossing into compliance with the Grade Crossing Standards (2014) so as to permit the railway
operations envisioned for the Initial Phase, i.e. an average of six trains per day traveling at a
maximum speed of 30 mph. Note that the type of warning system and the D Stopped sightline
requirements are primarily affected by the daily number of trains and the maximum train speed.
Appendix D contains the Grade Crossing Assessments identifying the improvements required for
the 75 grade crossings for which grade crossing field investigations were completed. Appendix E
contains a table that summarizes the condition rating off each component at each of the 75
crossings as well as the order of magnitude rehabilitation costs (+/- 30 percent) for each
component.
4.2 Rehabilitation Costs by Segment
Table 4.1 summarizes the order of magnitude rehabilitation costs (+/- 30 percent) for each of the
six study segments for the Initial Phase. The more urban segments, particularly Segment 1 from
Victoria to Langford, have lower average rehabilitation costs compared to more rural segments such
as Segment E and Port Alberni. Approximately $42 million would likely be needed to upgrade all
236 crossings to permit Initial Phase operations. Figures 4.1-4.3 graphically illustrate the estimated
rehabilitation cost at each of the 236 crossings.
Table 4.1: Grade Crossing Improvement Costs by Segment (Initial Phase)
SEGMENT NO. OF
CROSSINGS
AVERAGE
COST
TOTAL
COST
1 - Victoria Sub - Victoria (Mile 0.0) to Langford (Mile 7.9) 20 $145,000 $2,900,000
2 - Victoria Sub - Langford (Mile 7.9) to Duncan (Mile 39.7) 28 $196,000 $5,488,000
3 - Victoria Sub - Duncan (Mile 39.7) to Nanaimo (Mile 72.5) 61 $143,000 $8,723,000
4 - Victoria Sub - Nanaimo (Mile 72.5) to Parksville (Mile 95.2) 38 $149,000 $5,662,000
5 - Victoria Sub – Parksville (Mile 95.2) to Courtenay (Mile 139.7) 56 $226,000 $12,656,000
Victoria Sub 203 $175,000 $35,429,000
6 – Port Alberni Sub - Parksville (Mile 0.0) to Port Alberni (Mile 37.9) 33 $192,000 $6,336,000
ISLAND RAIL CORRIDOR 236 $177,000 $41,765,000
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 14
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Figure 4.1: Rehabilitation Cost – Segments 1 & 2
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 15
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Figure 4.2: Rehabilitation Cost – Segment 3
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 16
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Figure 4.3: Rehabilitation Cost – Segments 4, 5 & 6
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 17
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
4.3 Rehabilitation Costs by Warning System (Passive/Active)
Table 4.2 summarizes the rehabilitation cost based on the existing warning system. Passive
crossings have the highest average cost ($268,000) whereas active crossings with flashing lights
and bells have the lowest average cost ($153,000).
Table 4.2: Grade Crossing Improvement Costs by Warning System
EXISTING WARNING SYSTEM NO. OF CROSSINGS AVERAGE COST TOTAL COST
Passive 124 $268,000 $33,271,000
Active (Flashing Lights and Bells): 95 $153,000 $7,678,000
Active (Flashing Lights, Bells and Gates) 17 $164,000 $816,000
ISLAND RAIL CORRIDOR 236 $177,000 $41,765,000
4.4 Rehabilitation Costs by Component
Table 4.3 summarizes the rehabilitation cost for each of the components, with the three sightline
requirements separated out due to their significant cost implications.
Table 3.2: Grade Crossing Conditions by Component
COMPONENT AVERAGE COST MINIMUM COST MAXIMUM COST TOTAL COST
Crossing Surface $39,000 $10,000 $375,000 $8,631,000
Road Approach $12,000 $600 $183,000 $2,862,000
Warning System $9,000 $180 $300,600 $1,846,000
Traffic Control Devices $100 $240 $3,600 $64,000
Fences & Gates $13,000 $3,120 $78,000 $1,908,000
Subtotal $15,311,000
Sightlines
SSD $9,000 $60 $100,750 $1,548,000
D SSD $100 $80 $1,500 $9,000
D Stopped $122,000 $750 $450,000 $24,897,000
Subtotal $26,454,000
ISLAND RAIL CORRIDOR $177,000 $41,765,000
Note: Costs are associated with one component only, however, they may be required due to multiple factors (i.e. an active
warning system may be required due to the crossing angle and to satisfy the D Stopped sightline requirement.
The three improvements that have the largest financial impacts are:
1. Upgrading the warning system to satisfy the warning systems specifications in Section 9 of the
Grade Crossing Standards and the D Stopped requirements in Section 7 of the Grade Crossing
Standards ($26 million).
2. Repairing/replacing the crossing surface due to poor condition or insufficient surface width ($9
million).
3. Fences parallel to the track in locations where trespassing is a concern ($7 million).
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 18
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
This page intentionally left blank.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 A-1
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
APPENDIX A – LIST OF 75 CROSSINGS
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 A-2
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
This page intentionally left blank.
Table A.1: Grade Crossings subject to Field Investigation
SUBDIVISION MILE LOCATION CITY/TOWN SEGMENT CROSSING SURFACE
PROTECTION
Victoria 0.37 Tyee Rd Victoria A Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 0.77 Catherine St Victoria A Asphalt Active - FLBG
Victoria 0.83 Mary St Victoria A Asphalt Passive - RCS
Victoria 0.88 Russell St Victoria A Asphalt Passive - RCS
Victoria 1.10 Wilson St Victoria A Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 1.57 Devonshire Rd / Fairview Rd Esquimalt A Asphalt Active - FLBG
Victoria 6.90 Atkins Ave Langford A Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 8.24 Peatt Rd Langford B Concrete Active - FLBG
Victoria 8.52 Jacklin Rd Langford B Concrete Active - FLB
Victoria 27.75 Thrush Rd CVRD B Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 31.10 Hutchinson Rd CVRD B Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 34.10 Hillbank Rd CVRD B Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 35.50 Uphill Rd Bypass CVRD B Wood Passive - SRCS
Victoria 38.00 Miller Rd CVRD B Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 38.70 Allenby Rd Duncan B Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 39.75 Station St Duncan C Gravel Passive - RCS
Victoria 39.79 Coronation Ave Duncan C Gravel Passive - RCS
Victoria 40.00 James St North Cowichan C Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 40.23 Beverly St North Cowichan C Asphalt Active - FLBG
Victoria 41.38 Green Rd North Cowichan C Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 41.45 Friendship Tr North Cowichan C Concrete Passive - SRCS
Victoria 41.70 Drinkwater Rd North Cowichan C Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 47.80 Chemainus Rd North Cowichan C Concrete Active - FLB
Victoria 48.60 Ashcroft Rd North Cowichan C Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 50.00 Chemainus Rd North Cowichan C Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 51.35 Elm St North Cowichan D Wood Active - FLB
Victoria 52.30 Cook St North Cowichan D Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 57.03 Chemainus Rd Ladysmith D Rubber Active - FLBG
Victoria 60.88 Oyster-StoLo Rd CVRD D Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 63.14 Timberlands Rd Cassidy (NRD) D Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 65.52 Nanaimo River Rd NRD D Concrete Active - FLB
Victoria 71.30 Seventh St Nanaimo D Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 71.63 Bing Kee Tr Nanaimo D Concrete Passive - SRCS
Victoria 72.09 Kennedy St Nanaimo D Rubber Active - FLB
Victoria 72.40 Franklyn St Nanaimo E Rubber Active - FLB
Victoria 72.70 Wentworth St Nanaimo E Rubber Active - FLB
Victoria 73.40 Rosehill St Nanaimo E Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 74.29 St. David St / E&N Trail Nanaimo E Asphalt Passive - RCS
Victoria 74.48 Waddington Rd Nanaimo E Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 74.93 Montrose Ave / E&N Trail Nanaimo E Rubber Passive - RCS
Victoria 76.27 Rock City Rd / E&N Trail Nanaimo E Asphalt Passive - RCS
Victoria 77.23 Jingle Pot Rd / E&N Trail Nanaimo E Asphalt Passive - RCS
Victoria 77.30 Jingle Pot Rd Nanaimo E Rubber Active - FLBG
Victoria 78.50 Godfrey Rd Nanaimo E Asphalt Active - FLB
SUBDIVISION MILE LOCATION CITY/TOWN SEGMENT CROSSING SURFACE
PROTECTION
Victoria 79.40 The Pkwy Trail Nanaimo E Rubber Passive - RCS
Victoria 81.10 Ware Rd Lantzville E Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 86.65 Nanoose Station Rd Nanoose Bay (NRD) E Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 88.10 Powder Point Rd Nanoose Bay (NRD) E Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 90.10 Northwest Bay Logging Rd Nanoose Bay (NRD) E Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 91.90 Island Hwy Parksville E Asphalt Active - FLBG
Victoria 98.82 Drew Rd Qualicum Beach C Wood Active - FLB
Victoria 100.60 Qualicum Rd Qualicum Beach C Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 101.60 Memorial Ave Qualicum Beach C Rubber Active - FLBG
Victoria 102.60 Arbutus Rd Qualicum Beach C Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Victoria 104.84 Island Hwy NRD C Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 106.05 Island Hwy NRD C Concrete Active - FLB
Victoria 107.85 Polegate Rd NRD C Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 115.60 Jamieson Rd NRD C Concrete Passive - SRCS
Victoria 120.10 Berray Rd YQQRD C Rubber Active - FLB
Victoria 121.40 Island Hwy YQQRD C Rubber Active - FLB
Victoria 122.70 Hastings Rd YQQRD D Rubber Active - FLB
Victoria 124.98 Holiday Rd YQQRD D Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 134.85 Hatton Rd YQQRD D Asphalt Passive - RCS
Victoria 138.27 29th St Courtenay D Asphalt Active - FLB
Victoria 138.87 21st St Courtenay D Rubber Passive - RCS
Victoria 139.20 17th Ave Courtenay D Asphalt Passive - RCS
Port Alberni 1.70 Church Rd Parksville PA Asphalt Active - FLB
Port Alberni 3.90 Virginia Rd NRD PA Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Port Alberni 7.70 Hilliers Rd NRD PA Asphalt Active - FLB
Port Alberni 33.00 Smith Rd ACRD PA Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Port Alberni 33.30 Smith Rd ACRD PA Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Port Alberni 36.70 Lathom Rd Port Alberni PA Asphalt Active - FLB
Port Alberni 37.40 Roger St Port Alberni PA Asphalt Active - FLB
Port Alberni 38.65 Dunbar St Port Alberni PA Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Port Alberni 39.21 Beach Rd Port Alberni PA Asphalt Passive - SRCS
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 B-1
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
APPENDIX B - CONDITION RATING
DESCRIPTIONS
Table B.1: Condition Rating Descriptions - Crossing Surface
COMPONENT RATING DESCRIPTION
A. Crossing Surface
Material
Dimensions
Crossing Angle
5:
Excellent
Material - New construction (since 2014), no visible defects.
Dimensions - Crossing surface extends at least 0.5 m beyond either edge of
the traveled way.
Crossing Angle:
between 70 and 110 degrees without a warning system
between 30 and 150 degrees with a warning system
4:
Good
Material - Minor improvement needed; only shows superficial damage or
defect with no functional impact. Issues are addressed via routine
maintenance.
Dimensions - n/a - scaled 5 (pass) or 1 (fail).
Crossing Angle - n/a - scaled 5 (pass) or 1 (fail).
3:
Adequate
Material - Repairs are needed; crossing surface shows signs of surface
distress, defect, and / or deformation. The crossing surface is cosmetically
“fair”, but functions as intended.
Dimensions - n/a - scaled 5 (pass) or 1 (fail).
Crossing Angle- n/a - scaled 5 (pass) or 1 (fail).
2:
Marginal
Material - Crossing surface needs extensive repair at a minimum to address
surface distress (cracking), defects (bleeding, potholes, raveling), or
deformation (rutting, shoving, distortion). There currently does not appear
to be any safety issue.
Dimensions - n/a - scaled 5 (pass) or 1 (fail).
Crossing Angle - n/a - only scaled 5 (pass) or 1 (fail).
1:
Poor
Material - Crossing surface has critical defects affecting function. It is in
visibly poor condition and must be replaced rather than repaired. Material
has exceeded its useful life and warrants detailed review.
Dimensions - Crossing surface does not extend at least 0.5 m beyond either
edge of the traveled way.
Crossing Angle:
< 70 degrees or >110 degrees without a warning system
< 30 degrees or >150 degrees with a warning system
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 B-2
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Table B.2: Condition Rating Descriptions – Road Approach
COMPONENT RATING DESCRIPTION
B. Road Approach
Material
Gradient
Pavement Markings
5:
Excellent
Material - New construction (since 2014), no visible surface distress (cracking),
defects (bleeding, potholes, ravelling), or deformation (rutting, shoving, distortion)
and signs of wear.
Gradient - New construction (since 2014), meets requirements of “Good” rating.
Pavement Markings – New construction, meets MUTCDC guidelines, no signs of wear.
4:
Good
Material - Minor improvement needed; only shows superficial surface distress,
defect, deformation or signs of wear with no functional impact. Issues are addressed
via routine maintenance.
Gradient.
Public grade crossing for vehicular use - ratio of 1:50 (2 %) within 8 m of the nearest
rail and 1:20 (5 %) for 10 m beyond
Private grade crossing for vehicular use - ratio of 1:50 (2 %) within 8 m of the nearest
rail and 1:10 (10 %) for 10 m beyond
Sidewalk, path or trail - ratio of 1:50 (2 %) within 5 m of the nearest rail
Sidewalk, path or trail used by persons using assistive devices - ratio of 1:100 (1 %)
within 5 m of the nearest rail
Pavement Markings – Meets MUTCDC guidelines, minor improvement needed; only
shows superficial signs of wear with no functional impact.
3:
Adequate
Material - Repairs are needed; road surface show signs of surface distress, defect,
and / or deformation. The road material is cosmetically “fair”, but functions as
intended.
Gradient – Does not meet requirements of “Good” rating. No evidence of the
underside of vehicles coming into contact with the road surface and/or the rails
when crossing the railway.
Pavement Markings – Meets MUTCDC guidelines. Repainting is needed; pavement
markings show signs of wear, but functions as intended.
2:
Marginal
Material – Road approach needs extensive repair at a minimum to address surface
distress (cracking), defects (bleeding, potholes, ravelling), or deformation (rutting,
shoving, distortion). There currently does not appear to be any safety issue.
Gradient - New construction but does not meet requirements of “Good” rating. No
evidence to date of the underside of vehicles coming into contact with the road
surface and/or the rails when crossing the railway.
Pavement Markings – Do not meet MUTCDC guidelines. Pavement markings need
extensive repainting to address wear. There currently does not appear to be any
safety issue.
1:
Poor
Material – Road approach has critical defects or deformation affecting function. It is
in visibly poor condition and must be replaced rather than repaired. Material has
exceeded its useful life and warrants detailed review.
Gradient – Does not meet requirements of “Good” rating. Evidence of the underside
of vehicles coming into contact with the road surface and/or the rails when crossing
the railway.
Pavement Markings - Do not meet MUTCDC guidelines. Pavement markings have
critical defects affecting function. It is in visibly poor condition and must be
repainted.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 B-3
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Table B.3: Condition Rating Descriptions – Warning System
COMPONENT RATING DESCRIPTION
C. Warning System
Reflectorized Crossing
Signboard
Flashing Lights
Cantilever
Bells
Gates
5:
Excellent New construction, no visible defects.
4:
Good
Minor improvement needed; only shows superficial damage or
defect with no functional impact. Issues are addressed via routine
maintenance.
3:
Adequate
Repairs are needed; components show signs of corrosion and
damage. They are cosmetically “fair” but functioning as intended
under maintenance schedule.
2:
Marginal
Component or sub-components need extensive repair at a
minimum. More substantial part replacements and/or repairs are
frequent. There currently does not appear to be any safety issue.
Maintenance schedule is interrupted by more frequent
breakdowns.
1:
Poor
Component or sub-components have critical defects affecting
function. They are in visibly poor condition and must be replaced
rather than repaired. Maintenance schedule is reactive rather than
proactive due to frequent malfunction. Sub-components have
exceeded their useful life and warrant detailed review.
Table B.4: Condition Rating Descriptions - Traffic Control Devices
COMPONENT RATING DESCRIPTION
D. Traffic Control Devices
Number of Tracks sign
Stop sign
Stop Ahead sign
Railway Crossing Ahead sign
Advisory Speed Tab sign
Prepare to Stop at Railway
Crossing sign
Traffic signal
5:
Excellent New construction, no visible defects.
4:
Good
Minor improvement needed; only shows superficial damage or
defect with no functional impact. Issues are addressed via routine
maintenance.
3:
Adequate
Repairs are needed; sub-components show signs of corrosion and
damage. They are cosmetically “fair” but functioning as intended
under maintenance schedule.
2:
Marginal
Signs or traffics signals need extensive repair or relocation at a
minimum. More substantial part replacements and/or repairs are
frequent. Signs may not be properly located but there currently
does not appear to be any safety issue. Maintenance schedule is
interrupted by more frequent breakdowns.
1:
Poor
Signs or traffic signals are missing or have critical defects
affecting function. They are in visibly poor condition and must be
replaced rather than repaired. Maintenance schedule is reactive
rather than proactive due to frequent malfunction. Sub-
components have exceeded their useful life and warrant detailed
review.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 B-4
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Table B.5: Condition Rating Descriptions - Fencing and Gates
COMPONENT RATING DESCRIPTION
E. Fencing and Gates
Fencing
Gates
5:
Excellent New construction, no visible defects.
4:
Good
Minor improvement needed; only shows superficial damage or defect
with no functional impact. Issues are addressed via routine maintenance.
3:
Adequate
Repairs are needed; components show signs of corrosion and damage.
They are cosmetically “fair” but functioning as intended under
maintenance schedule.
2:
Marginal
Component or sub-components need extensive repair at a minimum.
More substantial part replacements and/or repairs are frequent. Fencing
or gates may have gaps but there currently does not appear to be any
safety issue. Maintenance schedule is interrupted by more frequent
breakdowns.
1:
Poor
Component or sub-components are missing or have critical defects
affecting function. They are in visibly poor condition and must be
replaced rather than repaired. Maintenance schedule is reactive rather
than proactive due to frequent malfunction. Sub-components have
exceeded their useful life and warrant detailed review.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 B-5
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
Table B.6: Condition Rating Descriptions – Sightlines
COMPONENT RATING DESCRIPTION
F. Sightlines
Stopping Sight Distance
(SSD)
D SSD
D Stopped
5:
Excellent New construction, meets requirements of “Good” rating.
4:
Good
Public grade crossing:
SSD is met on both approaches; and
D Stopped and D SSD is met for all quadrants; or
D Stopped does not apply if the grade crossing’s warning system has
gates, i.e. FLBG; or
D SSD does not apply if the grade crossing is equipped with a Stop sign
or warning system.
Private grade crossing:
SSD is met on both approaches; and
D Stopped and D SSD is met for all quadrants; or
D Stopped does not apply if the grade crossing’s warning system has
gates, i.e. FLBG; or
D SSD does not apply:
If the grade crossing is equipped with a Stop sign or warning system; or
If the railway design speed < 15 mph (25 km/h); and (i) the road leading
to the grade crossing is controlled by a locked barrier; or (ii) the grade
crossing is used by the public and not for the exclusive use of the
private authority.
3:
Adequate
Requirements can be met:
If vegetation obstructing the sightlines is cleared; and/or
If the posted roadway / railway design speeds can be reduced in
advance of the crossing.
2:
Marginal
Requirements cannot be met but it appears that it is physically or
economically feasible to correct the deficiency by improving the roadway
geometry.
1:
Poor
Requirements cannot be met and it appears that it is not physically or
economically feasible to correct the deficiency through mitigation
measures other than closing the crossing; reconfiguring / relocating the
crossing; or grade-separating the crossing.
T
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 B-6
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
his page intentionally left blank.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 C-1
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
APPENDIX C - FIELD REPORTS
(Under Separate Cover)
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 C-2
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
This page intentionally left blank.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 D-1
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
APPENDIX D – GRADE CROSSING CONDITION
ASSESSMENTS
(Under Separate Cover)
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 D-2
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
This page intentionally left blank.
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 E-1
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
APPENDIX E – SUMMARY OF CONDTIOIN
RATINGS AND IMPROVEMENT COSTS
Island Rail Corridor | Draft Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Grade Crossings) | November 29, 2019 E-2
S:\PROJECTS\FVW\04-19-0091 Island Rail Corridor CA\5.0 Deliverables\20191129_04-19-0091_Grade_Xing_Cond_Assess_RPT_V01.docx
This page intentionally left blank.
Table E.1: Grade Crossing Conition Ratings and Improvement Costs
Location Warning System Details Costs - Identified
No. Xing_No. Subdivision Sub_Mile Rdwy_Name City_Town Segment Protection CR_Xing_Surface_Obs CR_Road_Approach_Obs CR_Wng_Sys_Obs CR_TCD_Obs CR_F&G_Obs CR_Sight_Distance_Obs CR_SSD_Obs CR_DSSD_Obs CR_Dstopped_Obs Cost_Xing_Surface Cost_Road_Approach Cost_Sight_Distance Cost_SSD Cost_DSSD Cost_DStopped Cost_Wng_Sys Cost_TCD Cost_F&G
1 V000.37 Victoria 0.37 Tyee Rd Victoria 1 Active - FLB 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.5 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $32,000 $3,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0
3 V000.77 Victoria 0.77 Catherine St Victoria 1 Active - FLBG 2.7 2.8 3.3 3.8 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 $32,000 $3,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4 V000.83 Victoria 0.83 Mary St Victoria 1 Passive - RCS 2.7 3.1 1.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $450,000 $300 $0 $0
5 V000.88 Victoria 0.88 Russell St Victoria 1 Passive - RCS 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.8 2.5 5.0 $18,000 $3,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $900 $0
7 V001.10 Victoria 1.1 Wilson St Victoria 1 Active - FLB 3.3 2.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
8 V001.57 Victoria 1.57 Devonshire Rd / Fairview Rd Esquimalt 1 Active - FLBG 3.3 3.1 4.0 3.6 2.5 2.0 1.0 3.0 $10,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,000
19 V006.90 Victoria 6.9 Atkins Ave Langford 1 Active - FLB 2.5 3.1 2.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $130,000 $100,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $300 $0
21 V008.24 Victoria 8.24 Peatt Rd Langford 2 Active - FLBG 4.7 3.2 3.5 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.0 3.0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300 $300 $0
22 V008.52 Victoria 8.52 Jacklin Rd Langford 2 Active - FLB 3.3 2.7 3.5 4.0 4.0 2.3 1.0 3.0 3.0 $10,000 $5,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $1,200 $0
33 V027.75 Victoria 27.75 Thrush Rd CVRD 2 Passive - SRCS 3.0 2.8 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $91,500 $3,300 $300 $0 $3,000 $300,600 $300 $0
36 V031.10 Victoria 31.1 Hutchinson Rd CVRD 2 Passive - SRCS 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $375,300 $300 $0 $375,000 $300 $300 $0
39 V034.10 Victoria 34.1 Hillbank Rd CVRD 2 Passive - SRCS 3.3 3.0 3.5 2.3 1.0 3.0 3.0 $375,000 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0
41 V035.45 Victoria 35.5 Uphill Rd Bypass CVRD 2 Passive - SRCS 3.0 3.3 1.5 2.5 3.3 3.0 3.5 3.5 $18,000 $3,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $600 $3,600 $0
44 V038.00 Victoria 38 Miller Rd CVRD 2 Active - FLB 3.0 3.1 3.0 4.0 2.3 1.5 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $1,800 $300 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $0
46 V038.70 Victoria 38.7 Allenby Rd Duncan 2 Active - FLB 2.7 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $32,000 $4,000 $80,000 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0
49 V039.75 Victoria 39.75 Station St Duncan 3 Passive - RCS 2.7 3.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $40,000 $1,000 $2,250 $0 $0 $2,250 $300 $0 $39,000
51 V039.83 Victoria 39.83 Ingram St/Queens Rd Duncan 3 Active - FLB 3.3 3.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $32,000 $2,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $1,800 $39,000
52 V040.00 Victoria 40 James St North Cowichan 3 Active - FLB 3.3 1.6 3.3 3.0 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $27,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $1,500 $39,000
53 V040.23 Victoria 40.23 Beverly St North Cowichan 3 Active - FLBG 3.0 3.3 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 $32,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900 $0
55 V041.38 Victoria 41.38 Green Rd North Cowichan 3 Passive - SRCS 2.7 2.1 3.0 2.8 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $18,000 $3,000 $3,750 $750 $0 $3,000 $0 $300 $0
56 V041.45 Victoria 41.45 Friendship Tr North Cowichan 3 Passive - SRCS 4.7 3.1 4.0 4.0 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $0 $1,000 $14,000 $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $0
57 V041.70 Victoria 41.7 Drinkwater Rd North Cowichan 3 Active - FLB 4.3 2.5 4.0 3.0 4.0 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $0 $93,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0
63 V047.80 Victoria 47.8 Chemainus Rd North Cowichan 3 Active - FLB 4.0 2.9 3.4 2.3 2.0 1.0 4.0 $82,800 $93,000 $30,750 $750 $0 $30,000 $0 $600 $0
64 V048.60 Victoria 48.6 Ashcroft Rd North Cowichan 3 Passive - SRCS 3.0 2.9 1.0 2.0 2.3 3.0 1.0 2.8 $18,000 $183,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $300 $300 $0
66 V050.00 Victoria 50 Chemainus Rd North Cowichan 3 Active - FLB 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $103,750 $100,750 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0
70 V051.35 Victoria 51.35 Elm St North Cowichan 3 Active - FLB 2.7 2.9 3.5 3.5 2.9 3.0 2.0 3.8 $32,000 $4,000 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $30,000 $1,200 $0
72 V052.30 Victoria 52.3 Cook St North Cowichan 3 Active - FLB 4.0 2.8 3.4 4.0 3.0 1.3 2.0 1.0 1.0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $1,500 $0
77 V057.03 Victoria 57.03 Chemainus Rd Ladysmith 3 Active - FLBG 3.0 2.4 3.2 4.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $900 $0
81 V060.88 Victoria 60.88 Oyster-StoLo Rd CVRD 3 Passive - SRCS 3.7 2.7 3.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $300 $0 $0
84 V063.14 Victoria 63.14 Timberlands Rd Cassidy (NRD) 3 Active - FLB 2.7 2.4 2.7 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
87 V065.52 Victoria 65.52 Nanaimo River Rd NRD 3 Active - FLB 1.7 1.7 3.0 2.5 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
103 V071.63 Victoria 71.63 Bing Kee Tr Nanaimo 3 Passive - SRCS 2.3 2.7 2.6 5.0 3.0 2.7 2.0 3.0 3.0 $0 $0 $376,500 $1,500 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0
105 V072.09 Victoria 72.09 Kennedy St Nanaimo 3 Active - FLB 4.0 2.5 2.8 3.5 3.0 4.0 $0 $2,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
109 V072.40 Victoria 72.4 Franklyn St Nanaimo 3 Active - FLB 3.0 2.3 3.3 4.0 2.7 2.0 3.0 3.0 $0 $2,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
111 V072.70 Victoria 72.7 Wentworth St Nanaimo 4 Active - FLB 4.0 2.6 2.5 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $0 $2,000 $60,750 $750 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
115 V073.40 Victoria 73.4 Rosehill St Nanaimo 4 Active - FLB 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $0 $2,600 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
118 V073.87 Victoria 73.87 St. George St Nanaimo 4 Active - FLBG 2.7 2.6 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 $32,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
119 V074.29 Victoria 74.29 St. David St / E&N Trail Nanaimo 4 Passive - RCS 2.7 2.8 2.5 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600 $0 $78,000
120 V074.48 Victoria 74.48 Waddington Rd Nanaimo 4 Active - FLB 2.3 2.1 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $0 $2,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $300 $0 $0
126 V076.27 Victoria 76.27 Rock City Rd / E&N Trail Nanaimo 4 Passive - RCS 4.0 2.2 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600 $0 $78,000
127 V076.53 Victoria 76.53 Bowen Rd Nanaimo 4 Active - FLBG 3.0 2.4 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $0
128 V077.23 Victoria 77.23 Jingle Pot Rd / E&N Trail Nanaimo 4 Passive - RCS 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.5 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $3,000 $375,600 $0 $600 $375,000 $600 $0 $78,000
129 V077.30 Victoria 77.3 Jingle Pot Rd Nanaimo 4 Active - FLBG 3.0 2.6 1.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 $32,000 $2,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $11,500 $0 $0
132 V078.50 Victoria 78.5 Godfrey Rd Nanaimo 4 Active - FLB 4.0 2.3 2.6 3.8 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $1,200 $0 $0
133 V079.40 Victoria 79.4 The Pkwy Trail Nanaimo 4 Passive - RCS 3.0 3.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $6,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $600 $0 $39,000
135 V081.10 Victoria 81.1 Ware Rd Lantzville 4 Active - FLB 2.3 3.1 2.5 3.5 3.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
138 V086.65 Victoria 86.65 Nanoose Station Rd Nanoose Bay (NRD) 4 Passive - SRCS 2.3 2.1 3.5 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 3.0 $375,000 $6,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600 $0
141 V088.10 Victoria 88.1 Powder Point Rd Nanoose Bay (NRD) 4 Active - FLB 0.7 2.5 3.7 3.0 4.0 2.4 3.0 1.0 3.3 $18,000 $600 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $600 $0 $0
145 V090.10 Victoria 90.1 Northwest Bay Logging Rd Nanoose Bay (NRD) 4 Active - FLB 3.3 3.1 1.0 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $6,600 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
146 V091.90 Victoria 91.9 Island Hwy Parksville 4 Active - FLBG 3.0 3.3 3.1 1.5 2.5 2.0 3.0 $32,000 $2,600 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0
152 V098.82 Victoria 98.82 Drew Rd Qualicum Beach 5 Passive - SRCS 2.7 2.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $6,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $600 $0 $0
154 V100.60 Victoria 100.6 Qualicum Rd Qualicum Beach 5 Passive - SRCS 4.3 2.6 3.0 4.0 2.7 1.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0
155 V101.60 Victoria 101.6 Memorial Ave Qualicum Beach 5 Active - FLB 4.0 2.8 3.0 3.6 3.0 2.3 1.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $2,000 $30,750 $0 $0 $30,750 $3,500 $0 $0
157 V102.60 Victoria 102.6 Arbutus Rd Qualicum Beach 5 Passive - SRCS 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.3 1.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $2,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $300 $0 $0
162 V104.84 Victoria 104.84 Island Hwy NRD 5 Passive - SRCS 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $36,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0
164 V106.05 Victoria 106.05 Island Hwy NRD 5 Active - FLB 4.7 2.9 3.2 3.3 2.7 2.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $2,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $1,500 $0 $0
165 V107.85 Victoria 107.85 Polegate Rd NRD 5 Passive - SRCS 4.3 3.8 3.5 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $6,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0
175 V115.60 Victoria 115.6 Jamieson Rd NRD 5 Active - FLB 1.7 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $60,000 $30,000 $0 $30,000 $800 $0 $0
178 V120.10 Victoria 120.1 Berray Rd YQQRD 5 Passive - SRCS 4.3 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.5 2.6 3.0 1.0 3.8 $18,000 $6,000 $375,750 $750 $0 $375,000 $600 $0 $0
181 V121.40 Victoria 121.4 Island Hwy YQQRD 5 Active - FLB 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,300 $60,750 $750 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
182 V122.70 Victoria 122.7 Hastings Rd YQQRD 5 Passive - SRCS 4.3 2.8 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $6,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0
185 V124.98 Victoria 124.98 Holiday Rd YQQRD 5 Passive - SRCS 1.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $6,000 $375,750 $750 $0 $375,000 $300 $0 $0
194 V134.85 Victoria 134.85 Hatton Rd YQQRD 5 Passive - RCS 1.3 2.6 3.4 3.1 2.3 1.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $30,000 $2,250 $0 $1,500 $750 $0 $0 $3,500
199 V138.27 Victoria 138.27 29th St Courtenay 5 Active - FLB 1.0 2.9 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $32,000 $2,300 $60,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0
201 V138.87 Victoria 138.87 21st St Courtenay 5 Passive - RCS 1.0 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.8 $18,000 $5,000 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $600 $0 $78,000
202 V139.20 Victoria 139.2 17th Ave Courtenay 5 Active - FLB 2.7 2.3 2.5 4.5 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.0 4.0 $18,000 $2,000 $230,000 $100,000 $0 $130,000 $0 $300 $0
206 P001.70 Port Alberni 1.7 Church Rd Parksville 6 Active - FLB 1.3 2.8 2.8 3.7 2.7 2.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $1,000 $750 $0 $0 $750 $0 $0 $0
208 P003.90 Port Alberni 3.9 Virginia Rd NRD 6 Passive - SRCS 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $4,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $300 $0 $0
211 P007.70 Port Alberni 7.7 Hilliers Rd NRD 6 Active - FLB 2.7 2.8 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $2,000 $130,000 $100,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0
220 P033.00 Port Alberni 33 Smith Rd ACRD 6 Passive - SRCS 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 $318,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300 $0
221 P033.30 Port Alberni 33.3 Smith Rd ACRD 6 Passive - SRCS 3.0 2.7 3.0 3.8 4.0 2.5 3.0 1.0 3.5 $18,000 $4,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $600 $300 $0
225 P036.70 Port Alberni 36.7 Lathom Rd Port Alberni 6 Active - FLB 2.7 2.7 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.0 1.0 4.0 $18,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $1,200 $0
227 P037.40 Port Alberni 37.4 Roger St Port Alberni 6 Active - FLB 2.3 2.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 $32,000 $3,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0
232 P038.65 Port Alberni 38.65 Dunbar St Port Alberni 6 Passive - SRCS 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.0 2.3 3.0 1.0 3.0 $54,000 $18,000 $750 $0 $0 $750 $600 $900 $0
235 P039.21 Port Alberni 39.21 Beach Rd Port Alberni 6 Passive - SRCS 1.3 2.9 4.0 1.0 2.7 2.0 3.0 3.0 $18,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0
Island Rail Corridor CA
Condition Ratings - Observed
04-19-0091
FvW/SB/CQ
29-Nov-19