33
Pathways to Sustainability: Agendas for a new politics of environment, development and social justice ESRC STEPS Centre Conference September 23-24 2010

Melissa leach

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Melissa leach

Pathways to Sustainability:Agendas for a new politics of environment, development and

social justice

ESRC STEPS Centre Conference September 23-24 2010

Page 2: Melissa leach

Pathways to Sustainability:The STEPS Centre’s Approach

Melissa Leach

Pathways to Sustainability Conference September 23 2010

Page 3: Melissa leach

Environmental challenges

• Rapid environmental change• Complex dynamics• Interlocked crises and ‘perfect storms’? (Beddington 2009)• Scientific, policy and public concern – and politicisation• ‘A new climate for society’ (and social science)? (Jasanoff

2010)

Page 4: Melissa leach

In a (more) unequal world

• Social, economic and political change – mobility and interconnection (at least for some), instabilities

• New complexion to core development challenges• Poverty, inequity, (in)justice• Shifting geographies of power and privilege, emergent social

hierarchies• Shifting governance landscapes

Page 5: Melissa leach

How might pathways to sustainability – that link environmental integrity with social justice – be conceptualised and built – in a complex, dynamic world?

Page 6: Melissa leach

A timely moment?

UNCED 1992 a landmark for environmental policy and politics (Convention processes, Agenda 21) – and environmental social science

‘Rio Plus 20 Earth Summit’ – social science ideas, concepts, agendas, engagements?

‘green economy’, ‘institutional framework for sustainable development’

Page 7: Melissa leach

Presentation

• The STEPS Centre’s ‘pathways approach’

• Themes for the conference• Unresolved tensions, areas for

discussion

Page 8: Melissa leach

Contradictions

• Growing recognition of complexity and dynamism – intercoupled social, ecological, technological systems; non-linear, cross-scale dynamics; uncertainties

• Growing recognition of diverse knowledges and ways of knowing, values, perspectives, priorities

• Growing search for technical-managerial solutions premised on a far more static, consensual view of the world – solvable problems, achievable stability, controllable risks

……A mismatch - cycles of ‘failure’ as dynamics undermine assumptions of stability; emerging backlashes from nature, politics; mires of disagreement; those who are already vulnerable and marginal often lose out

Page 9: Melissa leach

Sustainability• A contested term with a history• From 1712 forestry usage to wider currency in the 1980s • Linking of environmental questions to mainstream issues of economy and

development: ‘Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (Brundtland 1987)

• Vibrant, committed debate at and around Rio 1992: economics and political science, broad and narrow, strong and weak, top-down and community-defined…. Technical meanings co-constructed with different visions for how sustainability should be achieved

• Through 1990s, growth in planning approaches, frameworks, measurement indicators, audit systems, evaluation protocols – managerialism and bureaucratisation

• Discrediting of ‘sustainability’? (empty rhetoric, failure of managerialism, conservatism, inadequacy of institutional and policy machinery)

• Yet sustainability is the ‘keyword’ for Rio plus 20 amidst complex environment-development challenges – more of the same?

Page 10: Melissa leach

Towards a normative, politicised perspective on sustainability

• Beyond generalised, colloquial notions (maintenance of system properties in a general sense)

• Beyond broad and static normative connotations of Brundtland – focused on notions of (poor people’s) ‘needs’ and environmental ‘limits’

• To address specified qualities of human wellbeing, social equity and environmental integrity – as they relate to dynamic environments

• Normative concern with those properties that assist reductions in poverty and social injustice – as defined by/for particular people, contexts and settings

• Multiple, contested sustainabilities to be defined and deliberated for particular issues and groupsE.g. African seed systems amidst climate-change related drought – sustainability

in relation to national food security? Livelihoods of dryland farmers? Women’s or men’s crop varieties and control?

• Sustainability as a discursive resource to facilitate argument and action about diverse pathways to different futures

Page 11: Melissa leach

‘system’

environment

System:Social, institutional, ecological and technological elements interactingIn dynamic ways

A systems perspective

Page 12: Melissa leach

Framings: Different ways of understanding or representing a system and its relevant environment

Integrating knowledge and values: Framing

Dimensions of framing

- Scale- Boundaries- Key elements and relationships- Dynamics in play- Outputs

- - Perspectives- - Interests- - Goals- Values- - Notions of relevant

experience

Page 13: Melissa leach

Narratives

Framings often become part of narratives – underlying storylines

• Produced by people and institutions• Beginning – a system, framed • Imaginary - futures desired or feared (what ideas, possibilities,

values, goals?)• Middle – a set of envisaged actions• Construction of publics – who will act, who will change their

behaviour, respond• End – catastrophe averted, outcome achieved, ‘sustainability’

enhanced

Page 14: Melissa leach

stating goals highlighting values assigning causesetting agendas defining problems characterising optionsposing questions prioritizing issues formulating criteriadeciding context setting baselines drawing boundariesdiscounting time choosing methods including disciplineshandling uncertainties recruiting expertise commissioning

researchconstituting ‘proof’ exploring sensitivities interpreting results

Creating narratives: Practices

Page 15: Melissa leach

Narrative examples

Energy and climate:‘The challenges of dealing with climate change and energy security can only be dealt with through large scale, centralized systems like carbon capture and new nuclear build’‘Appropriate reductions in carbon emissions are achievable by small scale, distributed innovations in technology, institutions and user behaviour, such as in smart grids, efficient use and micro-generation’.

Food (e.g. East Africa):‘Growing food deficits require massive boosts to agricultural productivity – modern plant breeding and genetic engineering can deliver solutions which need to be rolled out at scale’‘Food insecurities are diverse and shaped by ecological, market, social and institutional contexts, requiring socio-technical solutions in which farmer knowledge and local innovations have central roles to play’

Page 16: Melissa leach

Water (e.g. dryland India):

‘Major water scarcities are developing and undermining economic development; therefore the construction of large dams and investment in the infrastructure for water delivery must take place’

‘Water scarcities are often human induced by the greed and mismanagement of elites; for farmers and pastoralists maintaining livelihoods amidst uncertainties must be central, and can draw on local knowledge and historically-embedded practices’

Page 17: Melissa leach

shock (transient

disruption)

stress (enduring

shift)

control respond

temporality of change

style of action

STABILITY

Strategies and dynamics

DURABILITY

RESILIENCE

ROBUSTNESS

Page 18: Melissa leach

shock (transient

disruption)

stress (enduring

shift)

control respond

temporality of change

style of action

STABILITY

Dealing with water resources in dryland India:Strategies and dynamics

DURABILITY

RESILIENCE

ROBUSTNESS

Control of short-term supply variability through dams, pumps and pipes

Engineering solutions geared to long-term shifts in rainfall and hydrology (e.g. margins, reduced water levels)

Adaptive responses and interventions geared to floods and droughts (e.g. crop mixes, mobility, water harvesting) ; local knowledge, culturally-embedded practices

Response to long-term shifts in water supply and use (e.g. changes in land use, agricultural practices, livelihoods); variegated, flexible institutional and engineering arrangements

Page 19: Melissa leach

STABILITY

DURABILITY

RESILIENCE

ROBUSTNESS

SUSTAINABILITY

stress (enduring

shift)

control respond

temporality of change

style of action

STABILITY

DURABILITY

RESILIENCE

ROBUSTNESS

Page 20: Melissa leach

Pathways

• For any issue, we might identify an array of narratives• For each narrative, we might ask:

– Who are the actors?– How is the system and goals for change framed?– Which dynamic properties and strategies for dealing with them are

prioritised?

• Some narratives justify and become interlocked with powerful pathways – particular directions in which systems change over time

• Alternative narratives, hidden narratives, exclusions…. • Constructing pathways to sustainability requires recognition and

deliberation amongst multiple narratives and possible pathways

Page 21: Melissa leach

Governance

• Narratives and pathways co-constructed with governance • Intersections of power, politics and institutions, including power-

knowledge• Shape which come to dominate, and which remain marginalised

Often leads to ‘lock-in’ to particular powerful narrative and associated pathway, to the exclusion of others

Page 22: Melissa leach

Governance and pathways to sustainability

• From government to networked, multi-levelled governance• Participatory governance• Governance in practice• Politics of nature and technology• Political cultures and contexts• Politics of knowledge• Governmentalities (environmentalities)

Important to understand how ‘lock-in’ happens… and how it might be averted

Page 23: Melissa leach

shock (transient

disruption)

stress (enduring

shift)

control response

temporality of change

STABILITY

The politics of ‘closing down’ Towards singular narratives and pathwaysTowards stability-focused interventions

POWER DYNAMICS

DURABILITY

RESILIENCE

ROBUSTNESS

style of action

Page 24: Melissa leach

Governance pressures towards stability-focused interventions

• Incumbent institutions tend to favour strategies which preserve the status quo – and uphold political interests

• Deeply rooted ideas about equilibrium • Institutionalisation of routine responses• Financial and economic backing • Professional, disciplinary and cognitive pressures• Media and popular knowledge • Disciplining and transformation of subjectivities

Page 25: Melissa leach

From closing down to opening up

Meeting sustainability challenges will require:• Moving beyond singular views of ‘the problem’ and ‘progress’, to

recognise multiple possible goals and values and their contestation; • Moving beyond stability/control to embrace strategies that respond

to ongoing change, with respect to sustaining the flows and benefits valued by particular groups

Challenge dominant narratives/pathways; highlight alternatives

Page 26: Melissa leach

Climate change, drought and maize in Kenya

• Understanding and challenging ‘lock in’ to the dominant pathway – breeding and commercialization of drought-tolerant maize, geared to ‘resilience in the seed’, towards farm and national food security goals

• Opening up to alternative pathways – especially for ‘low potential’ areas (e.g. Sakai), geared to resilience of farming livelihoods

Page 27: Melissa leach

Multiple pathways –in and out of maize

• Local maize varieties predominate and are highly valued

• Important but under-recognised role of seed selectors

• In future – some farmers want drought tolerant maize varieties

• But many farmers are trying to move out of maize and into other crops – dryland staples and horticultural crops

Page 28: Melissa leach

Multiple pathways –in and out of maize

Low Maize High Maize

Low-ExternalInput

High-ExternalInput

1 – Alternative dryland staples for subsistence

2 – Alternative dryland staples for market

3 – local improvement of local maize

5 – Assisted seed multiplication of maize

4 – Assisted seed multiplication of alternative dryland staples

6 – Individual high-value crop commercialization

7 – Group-based high-value crop commercialization

8 – Commercial delivery of new DT maize varieties

9 – Public delivery of new DT maize varieties

Page 29: Melissa leach

Towards a politics for sustainability

• Governance approaches: Deliberative, Reflexive• Designs – roles for new appraisal tools and methods • Political engagement –

– influencing policy processes and effecting policy change; – citizen mobilisation, network and alliance-building– shaping information and communication flows in a multi-media knowledge

landscape

• Reflexive research engagements in which we take our positionality seriously

• May involve antagonistic confrontation and challenge as well as consensus-building

Page 30: Melissa leach

Social science and the politics of knowledge-making

After Burawoy, 2005

Page 31: Melissa leach

Conference themes and areas for discussion

• Contesting and governing sustainabilities: multi-level, deliberative, adaptive, and movement-based approaches – and beyond

• Framing and narratives: ensuring practical connections with questions of justice, material political economy and ecology

• Dynamics and sustainability: navigating complexities, transitions and transformations,natural science engagements

• Addressing ‘big picture’ environmental concerns and analysis without doing violence to the richness and diversity of people’s experiences

• Grounding concepts and approaches in diverse issues and contexts:– Climate change, water, agriculture, forests, fisheries, urban and peri-urban

environments

Page 32: Melissa leach

Towards Rio Plus 20 – and beyond

• Emerging themes• Research-policy roundtable

What kinds of knowledge can today’s environmental social science contribute?

What specific processes and opportunities might we engage with?

Page 33: Melissa leach

Enjoy the debate

www.steps-centre.org