Upload
jefferson-wetherill
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Melanoma – Natural History and Principles
of Treatment Melanoma Patient Symposium
YNHH – Smilow Cancer HospitalSept 11, 2014
What is Melanoma?
• Cancer of cells which are responsible for all types of body pigmentation (melanocytes)
• Melanocytes are primarily present in skin but are also present in the eye and mucous membranes (head sinuses, oral cavity, rectum/anus, vulva/vagina)
• Some types of melanoma are related to sun exposure and sunburns• Malignant cells gain special properties through genetic (mutations) and
other cell changes • Uncontrolled growth• Ability to travel in blood and lymphatics to other organs• Can implant in other organs and divide and grow (metastases)• Can remain dormant for years before growth is triggered• Dormant state cannot be detected by scans or other tests
Primary Tumor SkinMucosaOcular
Local (Lymphatic) DisseminationLocal recurrenceIn-transit metastasesRegional node involvement
Hematogenous Dissemination SkinLungLymph nodeLiverBoneGI/mesenteryCNS (+ leptomeninges)
?years
Biology of Dormancy Not Understood
Treatment of Primary Melanoma
• Excisional biopsy by dermatologist– Greater than 90% present without distant metastases
• Referral to surgeon• Wide local excision – margins ≥ 2cm for lesions > 1mm thick• Sentinel Node Biopsy in regional basin
– For lesions > 0.75 thick– For prognostic information – does not affect outcome
• In very high risk patients, CT scans or PET scans to rule out distant metastases
• Completion lymph node dissection (for positive SLNB)
The Three Important Questions After Complete Resection of Primary Melanoma (and Regional Nodes)
• What is my risk that distant metastases will be found in the future?
• What can be done to lower the risk that my cancer might recur?
• How will I be monitored to detect the cancer if it recurs?
Staging is Used to Provide Risk for Distant Recurrence (Distant Metastases)
• Risk Factors– Depth of primary – Ulceration under the microscope – Presence of cancer cells in the regional nodes (from the sentinel node biopsy and complete lymph
node dissection)
Principles of Monitoring for Recurrence
• No (good) data to understand the impact of frequency of type of monitoring on outcome– Both determined by risk
• Views on monitoring may change as more effective therapies are introduced for advanced disease
• Evaluation by oncologist every 3 months to 1 year• History, exam, blood work (CBC, liver function, LDH)• CT scans and/or PET-CT scans in high risk individuals every 6 to 12 months • Usually stop monitoring at 5-7 years• Dermatology evaluation 2-4x yearly for detection of second primaries (10% risk)
Options to Reduce Recurrence Risk
• Observation• Interferon-alfa
– Different dose and schedules– Administration for up to one year– Increases time to recurrence– Reduces overall risk of recurrence by about 10%– Can induce moderate to severe toxicity in some (fever, chills, fatigue, loss
of appetite, depression, difficulty in concentration)• Possible new options
– Ipilimumab (Yervoy) – not yet approved, data so far similar to interferon, potential for severe toxicity
• Clinical Trials – compare potential better agents to standard of care
Management of Advanced Disease
• Treat both the lesions seen on scans and areas of disease that have not yet appeared on scans – Surgery, local injection, or radiation not sufficient to eliminate the disease – Requires systemic (intravenous or oral) medications
• Use systemic therapies first that can induce long term remissions • Control pain and manage lesions early that may cause early morbidity (pain,
bleeding, limitation of function, unacceptable cosmetic appearance)• Screen the brain at baseline and every 8-12 weeks• CT scans of chest/abd/pelvis or CT chest + MRI abdomen/pelvis to ‘stage’
disease• Repeat scans every 6-12 weeks (depends of treatment)
Options for systemic therapies
• Clinical Trials • Immune therapies (can give long term remissions)
– High dose interleukin-2 (Proleukin)– Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) (Yervoy)– Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) (Keytruda)– Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) (Optiva) – approval pending
• Targeted therapies (rapid response in most but few have long term control)– BRAF mutation– dabrafenib (dafinlar)/trametinib (mekinist), vemurafenib (zelboraf)– NRAS mutation – investigation MEK + CDK4 inhibitors– C-kit (mucosal and acral-lentiginous melanomas) – imatinib, dasatinib, sorafenib, others
• Cytotoxic Chemotherapy (can work rapidly but only in a few and rarely achieve long term control)– Temozolomide (temodar) or dacarbazine– Carboplatin and paclitaxel– Biochemotherapy
Targeted therapies Immune therapies
ChemotherapyBiochemotherapy
mBRAF mNRAS mCKIT
Vemurafenib
Dabrafenib
Trametinib (MEKi)
Dabrafenib + Trametinib
Vemurafenib + cometinib
CDK4i + MEKi cKITi
Interleukin-2
Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4)
Anti-PD1(nivolumab)(pembrolizumab)
Nivolumab + ipilimumab
2014 – Treatment Options for Metastatic Melanoma
Eligible for Immunotherapy
Yes
No
Anti-PD1Anti-CTLA-4High dose IL-2Adoptive ImmunotherapyOther Investigational Immunotherapy Trials
BRAF mutation
Yes
BRAFi + MEKiBRAFi + otherERKi
NO mutation
Phase 1Other targeted RxAnti-angiogenesisSupportive careChemotherapy
PD
Brain metsGKS/SRSyes
no
C-kit mutation Ckit inhibitor
Yale Cancer Center Melanoma Treatment Algorithm
Mutation analyses NRAS mutation CDK4i + MEKi
6-24-05 11-23-05
Il-2 Induced Regression of Melanoma Liver Metastases
Persistent/progressing disease in spleen, SQ buttock, and lung removed; NED x 7 years
Response to Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg x 2 doses
2 baseline brain mets regressed also:No disease progression 5+ years
Sienkiewicz, Dina, LSienkiewicz, Dina, LUnit#: MR2263994Unit#: MR2263994Acc#: E101524698Acc#: E101524698DOB: 10/7/1967DOB: 10/7/1967F/46 YEARF/46 YEAR
Yale New Haven Hospital Yale New Haven HospitalCT NP 2506 LightSpeed VCTCT NP 2506 LightSpeed VCT
CT CHEST ABDOMEN PELVI S W I V CONTRASTCT CHEST ABDOMEN PELVI S W I V CONTRAST6.1 CHEST - ABDOMEN - PELVI S WI THOUT AND/OR WI TH6.1 CHEST - ABDOMEN - PELVI S WI THOUT AND/OR WI TH
6/5/2014 1:42:41 PMTech: DMTech: DM
ORAL OMNI & 85CC OMNI 350ORAL OMNI & 85CC OMNI 350HELI CAL MODE /1:42:41 PMHELI CAL MODE /1:42:41 PMW: 400 C: 40 Z: 1.53W: 400 C: 40 Z: 1.53600 - - -600 - - -KVp: 120KVp: 120Tilt: 0Tilt: 0FFSFFS
Page: 22 of 51Page: 22 of 51 I M: 22 SE: 601 I M: 22 SE: 601Compressed 8:1Compressed 8:1
- - - - - -- - - - - -XY: 8.60XY: 8.60
THK: 5THK: 5ASI R: SS20ASI R: SS20
NI : 135NI : 135
RR LL
HH
FF cm cm
Sienkiewicz, Dina, LSienkiewicz, Dina, LUnit#: MR2263994Unit#: MR2263994Acc#: E101726672Acc#: E101726672DOB: 10/7/1967DOB: 10/7/1967F/46 YEARF/46 YEAR
Yale New Haven Hospital Yale New Haven HospitalCT NP 2506 LightSpeed VCTCT NP 2506 LightSpeed VCT
CT CHEST ABDOMEN PELVI S W I V CONTRASTCT CHEST ABDOMEN PELVI S W I V CONTRAST6.1 CHEST - ABDOMEN - PELVI S WI THOUT AND/OR WI TH6.1 CHEST - ABDOMEN - PELVI S WI THOUT AND/OR WI TH
8/16/2014 10:53:26 AM 8/16/2014 10:53:26 AMTech: mtTech: mt
ORAL OMNI & 85CC OMNI 350ORAL OMNI & 85CC OMNI 350HELI CAL MODE /10:53:26 AMHELI CAL MODE /10:53:26 AMW: 409 C: 39 Z: 1.22W: 409 C: 39 Z: 1.22600 - - -600 - - -KVp: 120KVp: 120Tilt: 0Tilt: 0FFSFFS
Page: 25 of 54Page: 25 of 54 I M: 25 SE: 601 I M: 25 SE: 601Compressed 8:1Compressed 8:1
- - - - - -- - - - - -XY: 6.61XY: 6.61
THK: 5THK: 5ASI R: SS20ASI R: SS20
NI : 135NI : 135
RR LL
HH
FF cm cm
Presented by:
Overall Survival for Concurrent Therapy by Dose Cohort
Censored
1417166
53
1317166
52
1116156
48
1015156
46
815156
44
714136
40
71446
31
71326
28
7903
19
7400
11
53008
23005
23005
22004
10001
10001
00000
Pts at RiskNivo 0.3_IPI 3Nivo 1 _IPI 3Nivo 3_IPI 1Nivo 3_IPI 3Concurrent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Surv
ival
(%)
Months
2 Yr OS 88%
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
2 Yr OS 50%
2 Yr OS 79%
Concurrent Cohorts 1-3 (n=53)
Nivo 0.3 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg (n=14)Nivo 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg (n=17)Nivo 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg (n=16)Nivo 3 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg (n=6)
1 Yr OS 94%
1 Yr OS 85%
1 Yr OS 57%