TIFAtifawater.com/PDF/04.27.16 Meeting.pdfWATER RESOURCES 2836 GARDEN STREET-TITUSVILLE, FLORIDA Roll Call Action Items I. Approval of the Minutes of the TIFA LLC Meeting of March

TIFA

APRIL 27, 2016

AGENDA

TIFA LLC MEETING AGENDA April 28, 2016

1:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION CITY OF TITUSVILLE WATER RESOURCES

2836 GARDEN STREET- TITUSVILLE, FLORIDA

Roll Call

Action Items

I. Approval of the Minutes of the TIFA LLC Meeting of March 17, 2016 (Presenter: David deNagy)

II. Approval of Extension of Agreement with Governmental Management Services, LLC for One-Year at an Annual Fee of $26,000

Ill. Consideration of Modification of Easements (Presenter: Sean Stauffer)

Financial Items and Reports

IV. Ratification of Expenses Paid from Operating Account and Request for Reimbursement (Presenter: David deNagy)

V. Presentation of First Quarter Financial Statements (Presenter: Helen Hutchens)

Staff Reports/ Informational Items

VI. Documents Regarding Wellhead Leaks

VII. Area IV Phase 2 Update (Presenter: Sean Stauffer)

VIII. Update on Rail Trail Project (Presenter: Andy Jantzer)

IX. Update on Property Insurance Renewal (Presenter: Helen Hutchens)

Other Business

Public Comment

Next Scheduled Meeting

Open Items

Adjournment

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Date: April 21, 2016

To: TIF A LLC Management Committee

From: Sarah Sweeting, GMS, LLC

Subject: Approval of Minutes-March 17, 2016 TIFA LLC Meeting

Summary Explanation & Background: The draft minutes of the March 17, 2016 TIFA LLC meeting were previously circulated for review. The minutes of the TIF A LLC meeting are presented for review and approval. Since the draft minutes were circulated, comments were received from Farmton Water Resources I Miami Corporation on April 12, 2016. As of April 21, 2016 no comments were received from the City of Titusville. No other comments have been received.

Source of Funds: This action requires no funds.

Persons in Attendance

Minutes of TIF A LLC Meeting March 17,2016

11:00 a.m. City of Titusville Water Resources

Mourning Dove Water Plant 2836 Garden Street

Titusville, Florida 32796

Mike Brown, Miami Corporation, TIF A Management Committee Member Jim Ball, City of Titusville, TIF A Management Committee Member Ana Ochoa, City of Titusville, -------------------------Richard Broome, City of Titusville, City Attorney Andrew Jantzer, City of Titusville, Water Resources Deputy Director Barbra Goering, Farmton Water Resources (by telephone) Susan Pattock, Farmton Water Resources (by telephone) Pat Gagliardi, Farmton Water Resources (by telephone) Helen Hutchens, Miami Corporation (by telephone) Farlen Halikman, Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. Dave deNagy, GMS LLC

Dave deNagy conducted the meeting.

Action Items

I. Approval of the Minutes of the TIFA, LLC Meeting of February 25, 2016

Member Brown moved to approve the minutes of the TIF A meeting minutes of February 25, 2016. Member Ball concurred and the motion passed.

II. Approval of Renewal of TIF A Liability Insurance

Member Brown moved to approve renewal of TIF A liability msurance m the amount of $23,467.37. Member Ball concurred and the motion passed.

Financial Items and Reports

III. Presentation of the TIFA LLC Audit Report

Mr. Halikman presented the 2015 audit report. He advised that it was a clean audit opinion. The auditor's required "Communication with those charged with Governance" letter

was also presented. Member Ball moved to accept the 2015 audit report. Member Brown concurred and the report was accepted.

IV. Presentation of the Management Representation Letter

Member Brown moved to approve the Management Representation Letter to Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. Member Ball concurred and the letter and the signing of it were approved.

V. Presentation of the TIFA LLC Tax Return

The 2015 tax returns were presented to the members by Mr. Halikman. Member Ball moved to approve the 2015 tax returns. Member Brown concurred and the 2015 tax returns were approved.

VI. Ratification of Expenses Paid from Operating Account and Request for Reimbursement

Member Ball moved to ratify the expenses paid from the operating account and the request for reimbursement in the total amount of $10,546.95. Member Brown concurred and the motion passed.

Staff Reports/Informational Items

VII. Area IV Phase 2 Update

Mr. Jantzer stated, the wellfield is producing at 100% capacity through February. We have the outstanding wellhead defect claim and final payment being withheld for that. On February 24th CPH issued the claim notification to Felix basically saying that the wellhead assemblies are currently damaged by the repair work and pointing out that instrumentation and cabling were not protected during that work and asking that the wellhead assemblies and instruments and cables exposed to that work be replaced and that final payment under the construction contract is pending receipt of the plan of action by Felix to address those issues. On March 4th Felix issued a response stating that the position that Felix repair all the leaks and they have been functioning since December 16th there are no defects and any concerns by the owner about damages are speculation. If there are issues the warranty bond is in place to address any future issues and they obtained a certificate of final completion on December 16th and accordingly Felix is demanding final payment in the amount of $327,204.79 in accordance with their documents. Since that response an investigating team of city, Miami Corp. legal and engineering reps have discussed an approach and we have procured three proposals from weld inspecting agencies, to do a visual and dye testing inspection and X-ray inspection of the nine wellheads to come up with a quantitative, independent opinion as to whether or not that work is acceptable or defective. That would gauge the future direction of this claim but we thought it was important to have that independent field test information in. The low bidder on that was an inspection firm by the name of Renegade in the amount of $1, 168 to do that work for all nine wells. They broke it into the visual and dye testing of $518 and the X-Ray testing of $650 and

2

they expect to do all nine wells in one day. That would provide independent background information on the integrity of the welds because at this point the counterclaim is that our claims of damage are speculation, everything was sealed and working properly.

Member Brown asked did we get references on this company and what was the amount of the other bids?

Mr. Jantzer stated, the background on these inspectors is that to my knowledge they are all certified weld inspectors, certified by the prevailing organization that I think is the American Welding Society so it is an accredited program and we figured if they had that accreditation they were eligible and because they have the X-Ray testing equipment that is an investment that only reputable inspectors use so we know they are qualified for this type of work.

We did get different initial opinions from the different inspection agencies as to what type of tests to do. One agency said they didn't recommend the X-Ray testing the other agency said it was important that it be done in order to be able to see what was going on underneath the welds not just at the surface. We decided to be conservative and get more information and that the investment of the additional $650 for X-Ray testing would be good information to have.

Member Ball asked what was the spread on the bids? I understand the explanation regarding their qualifications and equipment but did they submit any kind of experience and qualifications with their bid?

Mr. Jantzer stated, there was not a request for review of qualifications, this was pulled together pretty quickly so we basically did it by phone tracking down these testing agencies through word of mouth and collected the bids. Just for the visual and dye penetrant testing $518 for Renegade, Space Sciences Services $760 and QC Laboratories $2,500. There was a pretty good spread although one and two were pretty close. For the X-Ray Renegade the low bidder their cost was $650, Space Sciences Services did not bid because they felt the X-Ray was not going to provide information or be feasible for these sites and QC Laboratories quoted $600 for the X-Ray component but QC had the high number for the visual and dye penetrant. As a package we found that Renegade Testing was the low bidder.

Mr. Broome stated, we share the same concern and that is that we get an inspection firm whose findings are going to be without dispute.

Member Brown stated, I feel very much like the inspection team that the X-Ray portion of that is probably going to be significant based on what I understand about welding. X-Ray is the only way you are going to be able to tell how deep that crack is that you see on the surface.

Member Ball stated, I'm comfortable in authorizing this work it is not that much to help determine the proper course of future action.

Member Ball moved to approve a proposal from Renegade to conduct an independent field test of nine wells in the amount of their low bid of $1,168. Member Brown concurred and the motion passed.

Member Ball stated, on the basis of what you told us about the response from Felix it sounds like there is a focus just on whether there is damage as a result of the work. I think part of the question ought to be in addition to whether we actually see damage is did we get what we paid for from a quality workmanship aspect? Is that a defensible approach on the claim as well? It may not be busted but it is not what we anticipated and it is not up to the quality of workmanship and spec that we had.

3

Mr. Broome stated, one of the things you will have to look at if we go down that path is if it is not then why was it accepted. What happened in that inspection and what did we rely on? It is my understanding that a lot of these repairs were done subsequent to the acceptance of the equipment so one of the things we need to look at is, is it faulty work in making repairs that we are having issues with, which are warranty or is actually as you stated not getting what we paid for originally, which would not be warranty it would go to the contract itself. We have to realize this was apparently accepted work under the contract and a certificate of acceptance was issued.

Member Ball stated, then we may have to look at a broader range of responsible parties. Mr. Broome asked Andy how soon do you think we can get a report back on the X-Ray? Mr. Jantzer stated, Jim Boyd was doing the one on one contact with this firm but I think

we were able to get them out next week. Mr. Broome asked do you know if part of this bid also involves a written report of their

findings? We are going to need that for the members and I suggest as soon as we get that report we have a meeting rather than wait for a month. I know we need to schedule the next meeting but maybe we need to have a special meeting between now and then if we get those results back. We know there might be a claim coming from non-payment of the contract amount soon. I don't know how long Felix is going to wait.

Mr. Jantzer stated, it says in their proposal acceptance criteria will be required in order to issue a test report. Test reports will be available the same day as inspection so it sounds like they have this worked out where they have automated inspection and reporting. The one point they bring up is acceptance criteria will be required in order to issue a test report. That has come out in our discussions that there was actually no well standards specified under the contract and this was brought up by more than one inspecting agent that in order to get quantifications in their inspections they really need to have a well specification in order to cross reference it to. That doesn't exist in this contract and we don't even have at this point a specific standard such as an A WWA standard or similar that was referenced. We may end up just adopting, say give us the most relevant standard and work with that.

Mr. Broome stated the original well the part of the assembly that we had issues with I thought it was the way they attempted to do the repairs and I don't know how you have criteria for a repair other than maybe an industry standard. Are we addressing an original failure as designed and completed or is it faulty repair work subsequent to acceptance of the contract? I'm not real clear on that.

Mr. Jantzer stated, there is kind of both going on. One of the details of the claim is that the original work leaked at eight of the nine wells and that required the repairs and the follow-up issue is the workmanship that went into the repairs.

Mr. Broome stated, that's what I'm wondering based on what we are paying this contractor to go out and do this X-Ray, etc. are they merely going to report and X-Ray the repair work or are they also maybe going to be able to evaluate the underlying original weld?

Member Brown stated, the X-Ray will do that based on what I understand about the XRay process. I'm not an expert but in the realm of business I have been exposed to that X-Ray will show the original reason for that repair and then should show you whether that repair is substantial enough to last.

Mr. Broome stated, I think it is important that we analyze both, that they understand we are asking for both. We don't have criteria they will just have to judge it on maybe an industry standard.

Member Brown asked was that not addressed by our design team?

4

Mr. Broome stated, I'm being told that there may not be specific criteria. Mr. Jantzer stated, we asked CPH for the well specification that was used and they said

there was none. I checked the contract documents myself and I didn't see one either. Member Ball asked why would they not have used a well specification, what would be

their answer to that? Mr. Jantzer stated, after their reply that there was none we didn't follow-up because that

was done with an email. Member Ball stated, I think we ought to get a little bit of CPH fingerprints on that. Mr. Broome stated, I alluded to that before and I agree. I think if CPH and I'm not sure

who inspected the work to determine that it met the criteria, the standards of the contract but how did they measure it ifthere was no criteria and what standard did they use? We rely on others to tell us that the contract was completed as designed when he accepted it. I would be curious as to what standards they used there must be something they judged this by. I think some of our direction for the managers might be to go to CPH and get that answer so we can provide it.

Member Ball moved to request staff to obtain written documentation from CPH as to how they determined the wells were acceptable and what standards they used if any and if not why did they determine as the engineer responsible for acceptance of the work why there was no standard needed. Member concurred and the motion passed.

Ms. Gagliardi stated, that seems reasonable. Member Ball stated, it is really asking them to document how they got to where they got

to. Mr. Broome stated, that is going to help us understand where we can and need to go

whether this is warranty or not or what we are dealing with. I think we need all that information to make an educated decision on how we are going to move forward.

Member Ball stated, that is two pieces of data we should be in a position to discuss when we have our special meeting, the results of the inspection and the documented feedback from CPH.

Mr. Jantzer stated, if there is a request for a specific design criteria since we have none in hand I think we are going to ask for something that replicates the industry standard in the opinion of the inspector and use that as the baseline for this review. At least if they need a standard to work with we will say work with your best industry standard on this.

Member Ball stated, I think what I hear you saying and I would agree with is that in their · opinion there should be an industry standard that if not specified would have been expected by anybody knowledgeable within that industry as to an acceptable well.

Mr. Broome asked do you think there is an industry standard something that is done in a professional workmanlike marmer?

Mr. Jantzer stated, yes I think Jim Boyd was looking into that and they came up with an ASME, Society of Mechanical Engineer type of standard that would probably be used on that but that will be just details that they will work out.

Member Brown stated, I would have thought an M.E. would have designed that portion of the project with the metallurgy and the welding that specifically would have required and that would have been in CPH's shop.

5

VIII. Update on Rail Trail Project

Mr. Jantzer stated, talking about the south section first, they were proceeding quickly. The city has been watching the activity and on March 7'h we issued a letter of concern to the general contractor and design engineer saying that your work is progressing toward the point where the project merges with our water main and fiber optic utilities and they are still not shown on the drawings properly and we also pointed out deficiencies in the field marking of them. We issued a letter of concern the contracting firm president replied within an hour and said that we are not going to work north of Station 335, which is a point we stipulated not to work north of until these concerns are resolved. He agreed to it and it sounds very cooperative.

Member Brown asked at what point are north and south separated? Is there a road name south of some address? They are clicking right along.

Mr. Jantzer stated, they do have other issues that are holding them from going basically where Folsom Road merges toward the rail trail that is the Station 335 that we pointed out to put the brakes on. I think there are a few other issues that they were also holding up work beyond that point as well, some drainage they are working out with the county. Their schedule is to have this resolved in about 30 days from this week, basically have the clearances to proceed further north after that point.

The north section of the project the drawings have just been completed the 60% drawings have been uploaded into the FDOT review site and now it needs to be disbursed to the stakeholders, which includes the City of Titusville so we will be reviewing that and review comments are due on that April 1 ''.

Other Business

Member Ball asked can I go back and ask about the certificate of completion? Were there any contingencies or conditions on that? Was it absolute? What did they get? Were there any limiting conditions or contingencies subject to further testing or pressurization?

Mr. Jantzer stated, my impression is that the certificate of final completion did not even have a punch list on it, everything was deemed done.

Member Brown stated, that would have been generated during startup phase. Mr. Jantzer stated, the startup phase initiated with the substantial completion certificate

then there was a punch list then they went through a couple months of addressing all the punch list items and CPH did on demand inspections as each punch list item was done. Once those were all done it is my understanding that they were cleared to do the final certificate of inspection once all the bonds and closeout paperwork issues and items were in order. Once that occurred they issued the final completion certificate and that would have released all the retainage as well. Normally if there is a punch list outstanding there is retainage outstanding but this is a final payment of all the holdings including retainage. Along that line of logic I think everything was deemed complete with that certificate.

Member Brown asked what was the date on it? Mr. Jantzer stated, December l 6'h. Member Brown stated, on the 31st of December there were repairs going on for the leaks.

They actually had a welder out the day before and the day of our meter read that month because the city had two folks there, one was overseeing or witnessing the repair work the other was involved in the meter reading with the auditors, myself and GMS.

6

Member Ball asked that repair work was the result ofleaks having been detected? Member Brown stated, that was the discussion. Member Ball asked was CPH the agent involved in directing the repairs? Member Brown stated, sure and there was some discussion some time ago about the

repair work whether or not anybody really had to direct repair work because at that point in time I understood it had not been accepted so any repair work may or may not have been overseen by CPH. If it was something that had been completed you would expect there to be oversight of the repair. I'm not sure of the details at that point. I think staff has a better handle on that than my memory.

Mr. Jantzer stated, it is my recollection that in that part where we had repairs occurring after completion that was classified as warranty activities and so it was between Felix and CPH who was acting as the agent in that and there were notifications from CPH to the city that Felix is doing repairs of leaks to the wellheads.

Member Ball stated, I think it would be useful to get a timeline because what I'm hearing is that if there was a certification signed off on December l 61

h and repair work on leaks was taking place two weeks later. Did the leaks just show up during that two-week period? When were the leaks detected, the day after they signed off on the equipment?

Mr. Jantzer stated, I think it would be good to do a timeline on that and come up with some solid answers. I will add that to my list.

Public Comment

Next Scheduled Meeting

Mr. deNagy stated, we were talking about having a special meeting and setting our regular monthly meeting.

Ms. Gagliardi asked can we schedule our regular meeting at this point and once we know we will have the report and the information has been gathered then schedule the special meeting?

Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. was scheduled as the next regular meeting.

Open Items

Adjournment

Member Ball moved to adjourn the meeting at 11 :40 a.m. Member Brown concurred and the meeting adjourned.

7

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS

Page 1 of 7

MODIFICATION OF EASEMENTS

THIS MODIFICATION OF EASEMENTS, is entered into this ____ day of _________, 2016, by MIAMI CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, whose mailing address is 410 North Michigan Avenue, Room 590, Chicago, Illinois, 60611; FARMTON WATER RESOURCES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose mailing address is 410 North Michigan Avenue, Room 590, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and SWALLOWTAIL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose mailing address is 410 North Michigan Avenue, Room 590, Chicago, Illinois, 60611, (collectively “Grantor”) and TIFA LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose mailing address is 2836 Garden Street, Titusville, Florida 32796 (“Grantee”).

RECITALS WHEREAS, MIAMI CORPORATION conveyed unto FARMTON WATER RESOURCES LLC, its successors and assigns, certain monitoring well easements dated May 24, 2010 for the purposes designated therein through, over and across property identified and described therein (“Original TIFA Easements”) and FARMTON WATER RESOURCES LLC assigned the Original TIFA Easements to Grantee by instrument dated May 24, 2010 and recorded June 24, 2010 in Official Records Book 6191 Page 2196 of Brevard County, Florida,; and

WHEREAS, ownership of the underlying property for the Original TIFA Easements was subsequently divided between MIAMI CORPORATION and SWALLOWTAIL LLC by deed dated May 14, 2012 and recorded May 18, 2021 in Official Records Book 6603 Page 1113 of Brevard county, Florida; and

WHEREAS, by deed dated March 2, 2016 and recorded March 10, 2016 in Brevard County, Florida in OR Book 7566 Page 382, SWALLOWTAIL LLC transferred the underlying property in its ownership to MIAMI CORPORATION, but joins in this Modification of Easements; WHEREAS, while ensuring compliance with recent modifications to the TIFA consumptive use permit, it was determined that the legal descriptions for specific portions of the Original TIFA Easements were found to overlap, creating redundant easement area; and WHEREAS, legal descriptions for the aforesaid specific portions of the Original TIFA Easements are attached hereto in Exhibit “A” (“Overlapping TIFA Easements”); and WHEREAS, the Grantor and Grantee desire to release the Overlapping TIFA Easements in order to remove redundant easement area and to replace the Overlapping TIFA Easements with modified easements conforming to the legal descriptions attached hereto in Exhibit “B” (“Modified TIFA Easements”); and

Page 2 of 7

WHEREAS, since the Modified TIFA Easements will replace the Overlapping TIFA Easements, the Grantee desires to release and renounce any and all interest, right, title, claim, demand and privilege Grantee has or may have in the Overlapping TIFA Easements; and

WHEREAS, the parties hereby acknowledge that this Modification of Easements is limited to the replacement of the Overlapping TIFA Easements with the Modified TIFA Easements, and in no way modifies any other easement rights and/or interests between the parties;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises of the parties

hereto, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Grantee hereby releases and renounces any and all interest, right, title, claim, demand

and privilege Grantee has or may have in the Overlapping TIFA Easements described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

2. Grantor and Grantee hereby replace the Overlapping TIFA Easements with the

Modified TIFA Easements described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto. 3. All other terms and conditions of the Original TIFA Easements not otherwise

modified or amended by this Modifications of Easements shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor and Grantee have hereunto set their respective

hands and seals on the day and year first above written.

Page 3 of 7

Signed in the presence of: MIAMI CORPORATION: Witness: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Print Name: ________________________ Print Name: Title: _______________________________ Witness: ___________________________ Print Name: _______________________ STATE OF __________________ COUNTY OF ________________ The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2016, by ____________________________, the grantor named in the foregoing Modification of Easements and who acknowledged having full authority to execute the document. He/she is personally known to me or has produced ___________________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________________________ Print or Type Name

My Commission Expires:

Page 4 of 7

FARMTON WATER RESROURCES LLC: Witness: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Print Name: ________________________ Print Name: Title: _______________________________ Witness: ___________________________ Print Name: ________________________ STATE OF __________________ COUNTY OF ________________ The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2016, by ____________________________, the grantor named in the foregoing Modification of Easements and who acknowledged having full authority to execute the document. He/she is personally known to me or has produced ___________________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________________________ Print or Type Name


Page 5 of 7

SWALLOWTAIL LLC: Witness: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Print Name: ________________________ Print Name: Title: _______________________________ Witness: ___________________________ Print Name: ________________________ STATE OF __________________ COUNTY OF ________________ The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2016, by ____________________________, the grantor named in the foregoing Modification of Easements and who acknowledged having full authority to execute the document. He/she is personally known to me or has produced ___________________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________________________ Print or Type Name


Page 6 of 7

TIFA LLC: Witness: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Print Name: ________________________ Michael Brown Title: Manager Witness: ___________________________ Print Name: ________________________ STATE OF __________________ COUNTY OF ________________ The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2016, by ____________________________, the grantee named in the foregoing Modification of Easements and who acknowledged having full authority to execute the document. He/she is personally known to me or has produced ___________________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________________________ Print or Type Name


Page 7 of 7

TIFA LLC: Witness: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Print Name: ________________________ Jim Ball Title: Manager Witness: ___________________________ Print Name: ________________________ STATE OF __________________ COUNTY OF ________________ The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2016, by ____________________________, the grantee named in the foregoing Modification of Easements and who acknowledged having full authority to execute the document. He/she is personally known to me or has produced ___________________________________ as identification. ____________________________________ Notary Public ____________________________________ Print or Type Name


EXHIBIT "A"

OVERLAPPING TIFA EASEMENTS

~~)

- i-i ' - ' .. :.1

INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS

J 990 Commonwealth lane + Tallahassee, Fl 32303 850/536-8455 • Fmc 850/ 536-8456

Wetland Area 4 - 2 Legal Description

WVJW gcyinc.com

A parcel of land containing 0.33 acres more or Jess located in Section 5, Township 20 South, Range 34 East, Brevard County, Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 386.71 feet to the Northeasterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide RIW); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Northeasterly right-of-way line a distance of 8538.21 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 87 Degrees 37 Minutes 38 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 38.23 feet (Chord Bearing = South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 06 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 34.62 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of 210.62 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 75 Degrees 00 Minutes 42 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 32.73 feet (Chord Bearing= North 14 Degrees 55 Minutes 08 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 30.44 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 22 Degrees 35 Minutes 10 Seconds West a distance of 877.70 feet; thence North 67 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing = South 67 Degrees 35 Minutes 09 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 67 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 30. 73 feet; thence South 75 Degrees 12 Minutes 45 Seconds East a distance of 151.69 feet; thence South 14 Degrees 47 Minutes 15 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 75 Degrees 12 Minutes 45 Seconds West a distance of 148.31 feet; thence South 67 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 27.35 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= South 22 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 22 Degrees 35 Minutes 10 Seconds East a distance of 844.56 feet; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 235.01 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 92 Degrees 21 Minutes 47 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.30 feet (Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 36.08 feet) to the Northeasterly right-ofway line of said trail and call this the point of tangency;

City of Titusville Brevard County Flonda A4-2 Sheet 6 of 54

l.DrpmOle 1 !eadquarters Pus! Office Box 1469 + Fblm City, FL 34991 + 800086-1066

.-

thence North 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds West along said Northeasterly right-ofway line a distance of60.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

This is a newly created description.

City of Titusville Brevard County Florida A4-2 Sheet 7 of54

~~~ INCORPORATED

BOUNDARY SURVEY OF WE1LAND AREA 4 - 2

~

i 1. m ~ ~ i

< ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~-

F ;;! F

"'" OE

p

HlS NOT TO SCALf P08 POINT Of' llEGINNHO POC • POINT Qf COUUfHCEMENT PC • POINT Of' M'IAlllftE Pl • POINT Qf INTERSECTION PT POINT OF TAHGOICY R RADJJS R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY

-1'- '"' NOT lD SCALE

0 • S£T &/fl' IRON ROD .tr: C~ STAW'ED •ocy INC. LB 4108"

0 • ElaS1ING ir~ ROUND ALUMIHUM Bf!EAKAWAY YOHUMENT W/ J.\" AUJNINUM CAP STAMPED "OCY IMC. LB 4108"

............ '" QUAR'lt:R COR>IJt

30 ,...L 29 _ "'""" """""' 31 .C32

WETlAND M£A 4 - 2 CONTAINING 0.33 ACRES

50~·:zs·w m.01'

"""°"""" COl:'JERUNE OF 24'± ~0£ DIRT RO

CURVE CURVE RADIUS CHORD BEARING

"' 2!i.OO' $83'~'06"[

C2 :lli.00' N14'55'oa"E

C3 2'.00' Sll7"M'De'"E

c; 25.00' S22"2.4'50"W

" ,., .. soei•'54-W

COl!l'O!!•lt~

f-c,=,-+-----o.,=,=.=,.=,o------+=,=,~,,,_-r.,=,-i ~ ~ ·~~~<f.E=:"' MllY.

COP'l'RICHT C 2006 RY CCV. INC., PRQr[SSIONAl SUR\/l:YORS .. ND MAPPERS

I I

. PROPOSED LOCATION OF A4-2 llONITillONG WELL

APPROXllA lE CENlERUHE Of

20'± 'MOE DIRT ROAD

TABLE CHORD DELTA ARC LENGlH ..... 57'37'38" ,.,,

J0.44' 1!1'00'42" 32.73' ,.,.. llO"OO'OO" ,..,,. ,.,.. ..... ... 30.2.7'

le.OB' 1n1•4r .. ,.. BOUNDARY SURYEY ~OR:

CITY OF 111US'llu.E Sl'!EV.-.110 COUNTY,

'

'

. "

~~~ INCORPORATED PROfFSSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS

1990 Commonwealth Lane • Tallahassee, FL 32303 850/536-8455 • Fax: 850/ 536-8456

Wetland Area 4 • 3 Legal Description

www.gcyinc com

A parcel of land containing 0. 76 acres more or Jess located in Section 5, Township 20 South, Range 34 East, Brevard County, Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Comer of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 386. 71 feet to the Northeasterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail ( l 00' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Northeasterly right-of-way line a distance of8538.21 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of87 Degrees 37 Minutes 38 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 38.23 feet (Chord Bearing= South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 06 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 34.62 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of238. l 3 feet; thence South 43 Degrees 51 Minutes 36 Seconds East a distance of I 667.68 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly, Easterly and Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 132.60 feet, a Central Angle of 82 Degrees 18 Minutes 33 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 190.49 feet (Chord Bearing= South 85 Degrees 00 Minutes 53 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 174.53 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 53 Degrees 49 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of82!.70 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= North 08 Degrees 49 Minutes 50 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 36 Degrees JO Minutes JO Seconds West a distance of54.74 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of84 Degrees 23 Minutes 59 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 36.83 feet (Chord Bearing= North 78 Degrees 22 Minutes 24 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 33.59 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 59 Degrees 25 Minutes 21 Seconds West a distance of 122.80 feet; thence North 30 Degrees 34 Minutes 39 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 59 Degrees 25 Minutes 21 Seconds East a distance of 154.53 feet; thence South 36 Degrees l 0 Minutes l 0 Seconds East a distance of 121.48 feet; thence South 53 Degrees 49 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of856.70 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 142.60 feet, a Central Angle of 82 Degrees 18 Minutes 34 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 204.86 feet (Chord Bearing= North 85 Degrees 00 Minutes 53 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 187.69 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 43 Degrees 51 Minutes 36 Seccinds West a distance of 1636.32 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards City of Titusville Brevard County, Florida A4-3 Sheet 9 of54

Corporate Headquarters Post Office Hox 1469 + Palm Citv. FL 34991 + 8001386-1066

the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 83 Degrees 42 Minutes 54 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 36.53 feet (Chord Bearing= North 85 Degrees 43 Minutes 05 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 33.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of204.30 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of92 Degrees 21 Minutes 47 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.30 feet (Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 36.08 feet) to the Northeasterly rigbt-ofway line of said trail and call this the point of tangency; thence North 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds West along said Northeasterly rigbt-of~way line a distance of60.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


City ofTitusville Brevard County, Florida A4-3 Sheet 10 of54

HIS •

"" -""' -PC •

" -PT •

' -R/W •

-+- -0 -

0 -

........

BOUNDARY SURVEY OF WETLAND AREA 4 - 3

"

WDll. HOT TO SCAii F'!JfiTOFl!E~C

APPRO)OMATE CEN'IIRUHE Of

20'~ MOE OOT ROAD

f>Oltl Of COWIDK:EMENT POlfT Of CURVA.1UR£ Pottl OF IHlfRSEClWN POllT Of TANGENCY

'''"'" RIGHT-Ol'-WAY

NOT 1tl SCA!.£

StT !!I/~ IRON ROD • CAP STAMPED "OCY INC. LB 410ll"

EltlS'ltlC 2Ji"ll30" ROUNO Al.JJliUNl.N BREAl<AWAY MONUMENT W/ J.\i" WJN1NW CM' STAMPfD "GCY INC. LS 4104"

QUARTER CORNER

CURVE

~

C2

"" C4

" " "

CURVE RADIUS CHORD BEARING

, ..... SSS'ofe'OO"E

t:U.110' sa.:1"00'53'E

za.oo· N08'~'50"E

2!1.C)(J' N78"22'24"W

142.110' N&l'OD'M-W

21!1.00' N&l"43'05"W

21!1.00" SOl,,4'M"W

TABLE CH ORO 34.oz' 174.53' ,.,.. 33.9'

1117.1111'

33.38'

.'Hl,OB'

I I

DELTA ARC LENG1H .,.,,,.. 38,23'

112,11·33• 1110.411'

90'00'00" ... ,,. 84'23'!:111" 38.llJ'

&Zill'34" 204.&D'

eJ'42''4" 311.53'

112'21'•r 40.30'

~~~ BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR:

30+29 • SECllOH ""'""'

31 32

I NQ_.I REVISIONS

I .1 DATE

INCORPORATED PROn:s810NAt. SllRVEYOltS AND llAPt'l!llS

Clll'Tlf'lt,\TI OP AlmlOWUTIOtl UI 4109 -·11:-PO- ><ff·llm R IWl1" ...... ..... ., ... .._ -(~)!lf-1QM

COP'llllCHT Cl 2005 9Y CCY, !NC , PR:Of'(SSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

CITY Of 111US\1u.E 9R[VARO COUNTY, FLORIO A

rijo « Dt<m"'V No. 07-1103-01-03

11 Of 54

~~~ INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS

1990 Commonwealth Lane • Tallahassee, FL 32303 850/536-84.'iS • Fax: 850/ 536"8456


www gcyinc.com

A parcel of land containing 0.53 acres more or less located in Section 5, Township 20 South, Range 34 East, Brevard County Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Comer of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 257. 91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (I 00' wide RJW); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 8613.23 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of92 Degrees 20 Minutes 57 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.29 feet (Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 36.07 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 1355.17 feet to a point on a curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1345.89 feet, a Central Angle of 03 Degrees 00 Minutes 15 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 70.57 feet (Chord Bearing= South 38 Degrees 33 Minutes 01 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 70.56 feet) to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 44 Degrees 33 Minutes 38 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said Curve of 19.44 feet(Chord Bearing= South 10 Degrees 38 Minutes 13 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 18.96 Feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 11 Degrees 38 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of 54.10 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 50.76 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 789.00 feet, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 182.68 feet (Chord Bearing= South 12 Degrees 59 Minutes 44 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 182.27 feet) to a point of compound curve; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of371.81 feet, a Central Angle of30 Degrees 27 Minutes 08 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 197.61 feet (Chord Bearing= South 34 Degrees 51Minutes18 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 195.30 feet); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 52 Degrees 24 Minutes 46 Seconds and an Arc Length along said curve of22.87 feet (Chord Bearing= South 65 Degrees 45 Minutes 58 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 22.08 feet) to the point of tangency; thence south 39 Degrees 33 Minutes 35 Seconds East a distance of 158.10 feet; thence North 50 Degrees 26 Minutes 25 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 39 Degrees 33 Minutes 35 Seconds West a distance of 158.10 feet to a point of curvature; thence City ofTltusvi!le Brevard County, Florida A4-7 Sheet 19 of 54

Corporate rleadquarren Fbst Office Box 1469 t Palm Cif:!,.; Fl 3499 l • 8001386-1066

•.

Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 58 Degrees 33 Minutes 28 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of25.55 feet (Chord Bearing= North 10 Degrees 16 Minutes 51 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 24.45 feet) to a point on a curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 38 l.81 feet, a Central Angle of 25 Degrees 41 Minutes 13 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 171.17 feet (Chord Bearing= North 32 Degrees 28 Minutes 20 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 169.74 feet) to a point of compound curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of799.00 feet, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 185.00 feet (Chord Bearing= North 12 Degrees 59 Minutes 44 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 184.58 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 50.28 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25. 00 feet, a Central Angle of 131 Degrees 48 Minutes 41 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 57.51 feet (Chord Bearing= North 77 Degrees 32 Minutes 57 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 45.64 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 53 Degrees 27 Minutes 20 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 36 Degrees 32 Minutes 41 Seconds West a distance of 64.85 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 1355.89 feet, a Central Angle of02 Degrees 23 Minutes 45 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 56.69 feet (Chord Bearing= North 37 Degrees 38 Minutes 52 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 56.69 feet) to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of74 Degrees 00 Minutes 01 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of32.29 feet (Chord Bearing= North 15 Degrees 25 Minutes 25 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 30.09 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of 1322.68 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 87 Degrees 38 Minutes 44 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 38.24 feet (Chord Bearing= South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 05 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 34.62 feet) to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of said trail and call this the point of tangency; thence North 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds West along said .. Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of60.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


City of Titusville Brevard County, Florida A4-7 Sheet 20 of54

BOUNDARY SURVEY OF WE1LAND AREA 4 - 7

soe"Je'SO"W----·· ~10·

WEl\.AHD AREA 4 - 7 CONTAINING 0.!13 Aa<ES

124'±

Wl£ljll,

"" NOT TO SCAI.£

"" POINT or llEGINNNG POC pat.IT Of COMMENCEMENT PC ~T OF CURVAME PCC POlff or COMPOUND CURVE Pl POINT Of IN'!ERSECllON PT POINT Of TAHGENCY R """"' R/W RIGHT-Of-WAY

-i- - NOT lt> SCALE

© SET !t/t" IRON ROD 4' CAP STAW'Ul "G(;Y INC. lS 4100"

0 EXISllHG 21J:"icl0' ROUNO ~UM IREAKAWAY MON.MENT W/ lo\" AU.ltlNUM CAP STAWP£1> ·ccv INC. LB 410B" ......... QUARlER COAAER

30+29

I

. - SECTION CORNER

31 32

NO REVISIONS DATE

H811'05'301 2&4&.U'

\_ SOUlH UNE or 5lC1ION '°

APPROlONAlt COllERUNE Of

2-4'2 Mlt DIRT ROAD

APPROXIMATE

~----20'~~T~

APPROlllMATE

""""""' "' 10':1: Wl>E '!RAIL ROAD

PROPOSED LOCATION OF A4-7 MONl~G WELL


°' , ..... SOt!14'&4"W

"' 134&.89' SJe~'O'l"E

C3 ..... S10'38'13"E

" 781Ul0' 5'2"Sll'44"W ,. J7Utl' SJ4111•u1·w

" ...... Sll!t'4!i'Ml"E

C7 ...... N10"ll'!t1"W

ca 351.81' M32'211'20*E

C9 7911.00' N12"8'44"E

C>O 2!!.00' N71'32'tl7"'E

°'' 1l!S5.llO' NJTJ8'5.2"W

°'' ...... N1&"23'Ul-C

'" ...... S83'4''05"E

TABLE CHORD 30.07'

70.118'

115.99' ,.,,,. 1116.:JO'

"""" 24.0'

1811,74'

TIM.tie'

~e•'

5"11.1111'

.lO.Olt'

"'"

30 '

29

31 •1 ..

32

! ~

DELTA ARC LENGTH

111'20'!t~ 40.20'

.J'OO"HI" 70.!t7'

44'33'W 111.44'

1J11!1'~ 182.81'

30'27'0ll" 1117.&1'

!'.12'24'40" ,,.., 118'33'28" ,.,,,. ~··1·13• 171.17'

TJ'lll'lle" 18!1.00'

131·40"41• !t7.!11'

2"2:3'0" ilo(UHI'

74"00'01. lli.N'

a7'31!'+r Je.24'

~~~ 80VN0ARY SURll[y FOR:

INCORPORATED PROPESSIONAL SllRYIYOR9 AND MAPPIRS

CSll!l'lnCA.R Of' Avn!OllUT!Oll I.I 4IOll

·~~ ,...,_..._ ... .__ •........-.n.n».i

{IDll)>Jl-M'!

QlY OF lllUSVIU.E BR(VARO i::OUNTY,

S<Olf; llo>l•' i·-1000' Otl 2./ Dr""" DI' 0.-0<I;

""' ""

Fi.ORIOA

r~o ll IJr•""'V N1>.

07-110J-D1-0ll

"'"' 21 ct 54 COPYRICHT Cl 2006 BY CCY. INC, PROrE'.SSIONAL S1JRVCYORS ANO t.IAPPERS Or<1win9 Nam1: U-7 BOUNDARY SURVEY.d•;

~~~ INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS

1990 Commonwealth Lane + Tallahassee, FL 32303 850/536-8455 + fax. 850/ 536-8456


W\.\JW gcyinc com


Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of257.91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 8613.23 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southeasterly, Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of92 Degrees 20 Minutes 57 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.29 feet (Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 36.07 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 1355. l 7 feet to a point on a curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1345.89 feet, a Central Angle of 03 Degrees 30 Minutes 28 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 82.40 feet (Chord Bearing= South 38 Degrees 17 Minutes 55 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 82.39 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 36 Degrees 32 Minutes 41 Seconds East a distance of960.68 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of714.16 feet, a Central Angle of3 I Degrees 04 Minutes 58 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 387.43 feet (Chord Bearing= South 21 Degrees 00 Minutes 12 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 382.70 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 05 Degrees 27 Minutes 43 Seconds East a distance of 809 .56 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 03 Degrees 08 Minutes 40 Seconds East a distance of660.70 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 04 Degrees 36 Minutes 23 Seconds East a distance of 356.03 feet; thence North 85 Degrees 23 Minutes 3 7 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= North 40 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 85 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds East a distance of 45.70 feet; thence North 78 Degrees 35 Minutes 53 Seconds East a distance of 150.36 feet; thence North 11Degrees24 Minutes 07 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 78 Degrees 35 Minutes 53 Seconds West a distance of 149.76 feet; thence South 85 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds West a distance of 45.10 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= North 49 Degrees 36 Minutes 22 City of Titusville Brevard county, Florida A4-9 Sheet 26 of 54 Corporate Headquarters

Post Office Bnx 1469 +Palm City. Ff_ 34991 + R00/386-1066

Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 04 Degrees 36 Minutes 23 Seconds West a distance of295.91 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 03 Degrees 08 Minutes 40 Seconds West a distance of 660. 77 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 05 Degrees 27 Minutes 43 Seconds West a distance of 809.76 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 724.16 feet, a Central Angle of 31 Degrees 04 Minutes 58 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 392.85 feet (Chord Bearing =North 21Degrees00 Minutes 12 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 388.05 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 36 Degrees 32 Minutes 41 Seconds West a distance of 958.44 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 1355.89 feet, a Central Angle of02 Degrees 23 Minutes 45 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 56.69 feet (Chord Bearing= North 37 Degrees 38 Minutes 52 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 56.69 feet) to a point on a curve; thence Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 74 Degrees 00 Minutes 01 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 32.29 feet (Chord Bearing= North 15 Degrees 25 Minutes 25 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 30.09 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of 1322.68 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 87 Degrees 38 Minutes 44 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 38.24 feet (Chord Bearing= South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 05 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 34.62 feet) to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of said trail and call this the point of tangency; thence North 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds West along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 60.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


City ofTitusville Brevard cowity, Florida A4-9 Sheet 27 of 54

~~rui ~~ttru INCORPORATED


POC SW CORNER OF lHE $£ .ll SECTION 30, ltl'llNSHIP 18

SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA .. ~

Ji8t'OO'Je"E 2ll7.91'

APPROXIMA 'IE CENTERUHt C<

24':1: 'MOE DIRT ROAD

\\£Tl.AND AREA 4 - 9 CONTAINING 1.12 ACRES

PQINT ON

""""

""''""'""1E CENlERUNE Of' 20':1: 'MOE Dill RO!'D

N1S NOT ID 5CAI.£ P08 POOH OF eEOOHNG POC • POINT OF COMMEN<::a!ENT PC POINT OF CURVAlURE Pl POINT OF INlERSECTION PT POINT OF TANGENCY R RNllUS R/W RIGHT-Of-WAY

-1-- • NOT 10 SCALE

0 SET !S/e" IRON ROO a CAP STAMPED "GCY INC. lB 4108"

0 EXISTitfG 2Ji"lll0" ROUND Al..U .... l,IM BREAKAWAY MONUMENT W/ 3,\" AUMIHLIM CM' STAYPfD "GCY NC. LB 41oe-

....-~ .. QUARlER COftHfR

PT

"

"

CURVE RADIUS

C1 25.00'

"' ........ "" 714.1&'

"' 2ll.OO'

" 2ll.OO'

"' 724.18'

C7 13S&.8t'

2MO'

2ll.OO'

PC

• ~ ~ ~ ' 5 \

\

§ " •.

" l \ ~

t ~

~ ~ ~ lit

PT

10.oo' M~'23'3Tt

I

SOUTH UNE Of SECTIOH 30

30 ! 29 __ "1,._ 31 I 32

CURVE TABLE CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA ARC LENGTH

soei4·54-w 38.0T 112'20'sr 40.211'

SJai7'5$9£ ...... J"J0'28 • ... ... S21"00'12'"t ,...,.. J1'04'sa" 387.4J'

N40"23'3?'9E ,.,.. 90'00'00" 39.2T

1«8'39'22."W JO.JO' to'OO'OO" 39.27'

N21110'1rw ....... 31'04'S&" ....... N3T.3ll'!S2"W SO.GI' 2"23'45" M.eo· N15'2.ll~"E JO.Oii' 74'00'01" 32.2''

S83'45'o!"t J4.fl2' BTJ8'44" 31.24'

PROPOSED LOCATION OF ~ A4-9 YONJroRtNG \IE.L

--~ _a~ ..

• • ·~1~·3'8

M1&~

NM73'JTE <t!l.70'

90UNOARY SURVEY FOA:

~~~ 30+29_ QTY Of 111US\1LLE SECTION COffNER 8RCVARO COUNTY, f't.ORIOA

31 32 INCORPORATED PR0"5SIONAL 5URVt¥0BS ANI> NAPPIRS Sea: Dolt: f•t f: Vro""'ll Ho.: CUID\C..1"1 Of' A111110a!U.notl UI flOll , ... "°°' O! 12 08 07-1103-01-03 D:IOO'(llll•'ll(JITI(:(

'~-Pl)...,., .... ,lm ........ !lll .... 1no---.1H(.&H[ o,...., ai< -~ ~-· ..... gft,11. l<Nl 1 ..... .....mr.l'l .,,.... •• R(V1Sl0NS "'" " c..:i1•-•* (WI)..,. __

""" ... 28 ~ 54 COPYRIGHT Cl 2006 BY GCY, !NC , PROl'ESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS

~~~. INCORPORATED PROFl::SSIO.'JAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS

1990 Commonwealth Lane• Tallahassee, FL 32303 850!5..16-8455 + Fax: 850/ S.16-8456


www.gcyinc.com

A parcel ofland containing 1.16 acres more or less located in Section 8, Township 20 South, Range 34 East, Brevard County Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 257. 91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (I 00' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 3 7 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 8613.23 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of92 Degrees 20 Minutes 57 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.29 feet (Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 36.07 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 1355.17 feet to a point on a curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1345.89 feet, a Central Angle of 03 Degrees 00 Minutes 15 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 70.57 feet (Chord Bearing= South 38 Degrees 33 Minutes 0 l Seconds East, Chord Distance= 70.56 feet) to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 44 Degrees 33 Minutes 38 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 19.44 feet (Chord Bearing= South l 0 Degrees 38 Minutes 13 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 18.96 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 11 Degrees 38 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of 54.10 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 50. 76 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 789.00 feet, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 182.68 feet (Chord Bearing= South 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 182.27 feet) to a point of a compound curve; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of371.81 feet, a Central Angle of39 Degrees 11 Minutes 25 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 254.32 feet (Chord Bearing = South 39 Degrees 13 Minutes 26 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 249.39 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 58 Degrees 49 Minutes 07 Seconds West a distance of 398.98 feet to a point ofintersection; thence South 69 Degrees 37 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of l 03.64 feet; thence South 58 Degrees 39 Minutes 04 Seconds West a distance of 66.27 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 54 Degrees 45 Minutes 00 Seconds West a distance of 362.42 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 49 Degrees 3 7 Minutes 24 Seconds West a distance of 13 7. 71 feet; thence South 40 Degrees 22 Minutes 36 Seconds East a distance of I 0.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right City of Titusville Brevard County, Florida A4-15 Corporate Headquarters Sheet 42 of 54 Posl Office Box 1469 + Palm Citv, FL 34991 + ROOfJ86- I 066

·-

having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 126 Degrees 16 Minutes 47 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 55.10 feet (Chord Bearing= South 67 Degrees 14 Minutes 12 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 44.61 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 04 Degrees 05 Minutes 48 Seconds East a distance of 263.10 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 05 Degrees 56 Minutes 06 Seconds East a distance of205.63 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of605.00 feet, a Central Angle of21Degrees31Minutes49 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of227.34 feet (Chord Bearing= South 16 Degrees 42 Minutes 00 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 226.01 feet) to the point of reverse curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 494.50 feet, a Central Angle of 22 Degrees 33 Minutes 26 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of 194.68 feet (Chord Bearing= South 16 Degrees 11 Minutes 11 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 193.43 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 04 Degrees 54 Minutes 29 Seconds East a distance of 192. 72 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= South 40 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 85 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seconds West a distance of 394.53 feet; thence South 38 Degrees 41 Minutes 43 Seconds West a distance of 156.98 feet; thence South 51Degrees18 Minutes 16 Seconds East a distance of I0.00 feet; thence North 38 Degrees 41 Minutes 43 Seconds East a distance of 141.98 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 46 Degrees 23 Minutes 49 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 20.24 feet (Chord Bearing= North 61Degrees55 Minutes 37 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 19.70 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 85 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seconds East a distance of 414.53 feet; thence North 04 Degrees 54 Minutes 29 Seconds West a distance of 227. 72 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 504.50 feet, a Central Angle of22 Degrees 33 Minutes 26 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of 198.62 feet, (Chord Bearing= North 16 Degrees 11 Minutes 11 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 197.34 feet) to the point of reverse curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 595.00 feet, a Central Angle of2t Degrees 31 Minutes 49 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of223.58 feet (Chord Bearing =North 16 Degrees 42 Minutes 00 Seconds West, Chord Distance~ 222.27 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 05 Degrees 56 Minutes 06 Seconds West a distance of 205.47 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 04 Degrees 05 Minutes 47 Seconds West a distance of 306.99 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 53 Degrees 43 Minutes 12 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of23.44 feet (Chord Bearing= North 22 Degrees 45 Minutes 48 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 22.59 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 49 Degrees 37 Minutes 24 Seconds East a distance of 62.83 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 54 Degrees 45 Minutes 00 Seconds East a distance of 361.63 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 58 Degrees 39 Minutes 04 Seconds East a distance of 64.97 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 69 Degrees 37 Minutes 36 Seconds East a distance of I 03.63 feet to a point of

City of Titusville Brevard County, Florida A4-15 Sheet 43 of 54

·.

intersection; thence North 58 Degrees 49 Minutes 07 Seconds East a distance of399.93 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 381.81 feet, a Central Angle of 39 Degrees 11 Minutes 25 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 261.16 feet (Chord Bearing= North 39 Degrees 13 Minutes 26 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 256.10 feet) to a point ofa compound curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 799.00 feet, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 185.00 feet (Chord Bearing= North 12 Degrees 59 Minutes 44 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 184.58 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 50.28 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 131 Degrees 48 Minutes 41 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of57.51 feet (Chord Bearing= North 77 Degrees 32 Minutes 57 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 45.64 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 53 Degrees 27 Minutes 20 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 36 Degrees 32 Minutes 41 Seconds West a distance of 64.85 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1355.89 feet, a Central Angle of 02 Degrees 23 Minutes 45 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 56.69 feet (Chord Bearing= North 3 7 Degrees 38 Minutes 52 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 56.69 feet) to a point of curvature of a curve concave towards the right; thence Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly along said curve having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of74 Degrees 00 Minutes 01 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of32.29 feet (Chord Bearing= North 15 Degrees 25 Minutes 25 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 30.09 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of 1322.68 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 87 Degrees 38 Minutes 44 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of38.24 feet (Chord Bearing= South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 05 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 34.62 feet) to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of said trail and call this the point of tangency; thence North 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds West along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 60.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.



~~~ JNCORPORATED

~DARE"A4-1 CONTAINING 1.115 ACRES

MTS HOT TII SCALE POB POINT Of BE~ING POC POINT Of COMWENCEMENT PC POINT Of CURVAlURE Pt:C POINT Of COMPOUND (1JR'JE Pl POINT Of IHlDISECTIOH PT POINT Of TNtCEHCT R RADIUS R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY

-1,,- "' NOT TO SCALE

0 SET !/8' RON ROD 6 CAP STAWPED 'OCY INC. UI .. !08'


30 29 _____ , ... I ...

N'PROXIMAlE tnfTERUNE Of

24':t 'MOE DIRT ROAD

APPROXllfA1E CDITERLJNE OF

20':1: 1W>! OftT RCW>

·:>.~"'---N~'2T20"E 10.00'

APPROllllllAlE CCHTERUNE Of

10':t 'MOE TRAIL ROAD

CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA

JS.07' 92'20'157"

70.S&' 3"00'1!"

2!.00' S1D'38'1.l*E

" 371.111'

'" NJCMJ'2&"E

'" 7ii.oo'

"' 2&.00'

"' 1~111·

31 32

ARC LENG1H

40.29'

70.ST

11.44'

182.IHI'

2111.115'

lM.00'

157.51'

1'18.89'

0 EXIS"mG ~"•30" ROUND Al..Ut.llNUW BREAKAWAY MONUMENT W/ -"" AUININUM CAP '"

2.e.00'

25.00'

N1!'2~:m.'E 32.211'

S8Y.f&'O!l'E 34.82' B7'38'4J" JIS.24' STAIWfD 'GCY INC, LB 4108"

.......... .. QUAIUtR CORNER

30+29. '"""' """"' 31 32

NO A(\o1SIONS '"' "

~~~ INCORPORATED

PROPESSIOKl.I, SURVEYORS AND MAPf'BRS CDTIP!Cli'l'I OP AVT1MllllA'nOll U il09

COPYRIGHT C 2006 BY GCY, INC., PROf£SSl~AL SURVEYORS liNO MAPPERS

EIOUNOARY SURVEY FOR:

QTY OF TilUS'llu.E

s.;'""' tor..°"'"'"'~ .... t'-000' 07-1103-01-0l


CONTINUED

APPMOlGMA'!t

""'"""""' 10':1: "C1£ lfWI. ROAD

WEll.AND AREA 4 - 13 CONTAINING 1.18 ACRES

S05'58'0ll"E 20!U13' PC'

' . " '"

39'04"E 1'4.t7'

"""'"'" .. "' "'"""''' Of 10':1: 'MOE '!RAIL ROAi>

"" PCB NOT ro SC"'-£ POINT Of llECINNNG POINT Of COIAIENCnlENT POINT Of cut\tATURE

CURVE TABLE roe " PCC

" PRC

" " •/W

-1- -0

0

.......

POINT Of CQilPOUND C1JlM: POINT Of INlDtSECTION POINT Of R£'o£RSC OJR'IE POINT Of TANttHCY IW>IUS RIGHT-Of-WAY

NOT TO SCALE

stT 5/e" IRON ROO 6: CAP STAMPED "GCY INC. lB 4100"

EX!SllHG 2'i•30" ROUfojD AUIMINUY BREAKAWAY MONUMENT W/ liri"

"""'""""' STAMPED "GCY INC. l8 4106"

QUARlER CORt£R

30+29_ """"'""""" 31 32

NO. R£VISIONS

CURVE

" "' " " "'' "'' "'' "''

COP\'lllCHT Q 2006 BY CCV, INC., PROFtSSIONAL SUR1/EYORS ANO MAPPERS

RADIUS CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA

25.00' S07"14'12"E 44.01' 120,0'47" .,._.,,. 510"42'00"E: 220.01· 21"31'40"

494.tKl' 51811'11"E ,,.,...,. 22"J3'2tl"

20.00' S40'0:i'Jl"W ....... ...... ,.. 25.00' Nll1~'37"E 19.70' 48'2.l'40"

""·"' N1811'1,-W 1117.34' ll:"l3'2tl"

o".oo' N10•42'00"W 222.V' 21'31'411"

25.00' N22'45'48"E "'''" 53"4J'l~

ARC LENGni

M.10'

227.34'

194.88"

39.27' ' 20.24'

1118..02'

223.:!G'

23.44'

' ~~~ INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS

1990 Commonwealth Lane • Tallahassee, Fl. 32303 8501536-8455 t Fax: 850/ 536-8456


v .. 1wtv.gcyinc.com

A parcel of land containing 1.05 acres more or less located in Section 31, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of257.91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 1954.95 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of81 Degrees 24 Minutes 09 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of35.52 feet (Chord Bearing~ South 00 Degrees 36 Minutes 59 Seconds West, Chord Distance~ 32.61 feet) to the point of.tangency; thence South 45 Degrees 24 Minutes 28 Seconds West a distance of 98.96 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 62 Degrees 37 Minutes 20 Seconds West a distance of203.29 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of98 Degrees 48 Minutes 42 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 43.11 feet (Chord Bearing= North 67 Degrees 58 Minutes 18 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 37.97 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 18 Degrees 33 Minutes 58 Seconds West a distance of 63.83 feet; thence South 29 Degrees 32 Minutes 03 Seconds West a distance of 522.53 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 33 Degrees 26 Minutes 47 Seconds West a distance of 580.67 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 37 Degrees 03 Minutes 38 Seconds West a distance of 573.43 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 828.64 feet, a Central Angle of 25 Degrees 35 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 370.00 feet (Chord Bearing~ South 24 Degrees 16 Minutes 08 Seconds West, Chord Distance~ 366.93 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 11 Degrees 28 Minutes 38 Seconds West a distance of 591.10 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of2190.05 feet, a Central Angle of 10 Degrees 24 Minutes 44 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of397.99 feet (Chord Bearing= South 16 Degrees 41 Minutes 00 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 397.44 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 21Degrees53 Minutes 22 Seconds West a distance of782.22 feet; thence South 68 Degrees 06 Minutes 38 Seconds East a distance of96.42 feet; thence North 57 Degrees 59 Minutes 57 Seconds East a distance of 153.12 feet; thence North 32 Degrees 00 Minutes 03 Seconds West a distance of I 0.00 feet; thence South 57 Degrees 59 Minutes 57 Seconds West a distance of 135.33 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 53 Degrees 53 Minutes 58 Seconds, City ofTirusviJle Brevard County, Florida A4~ 16 Corpornte Heodquarter.s Sheet 47 of 54 Post Office Box 7469 + Pnhn City, FL 34991 + 8001386-1066

and an Arc Length along said curve of23.52 feet (Chord Bearing= South 84 Degrees 56 Minutes 39 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 22.66 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 68 Degrees 06 Minutes 38 Seconds West a distance of 43.63 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= North 23 Degrees 06 Minutes 38 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 21 Degrees 53 Minutes 22 Seconds East a distance of747.22 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 2200.05 feet, a Central Angle of I 0 Degrees 24 Minutes 44 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 399.81 feet( Chord Bearing= North 16 Degrees 41 Minutes 00 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 399.26 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 11 Degrees 28 Minutes 38 Seconds East a distance of 591.10 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 818.64 feet, a Central Angle of25 Degrees 35 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of365.53 feet (Chord Bearing= North 24 Degrees 16 Minutes 08 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 362.50 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 37 Degrees 03 Minutes 3 8 Seconds East a distance of 573. 74 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 33 Degrees 26 Minutes 47 Seconds East a distance of 581.32 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 29 Degrees 32 Minutes 03 Seconds East a distance of 455.65 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 20.00 feet, a Central Angle of 131 Degrees 53 Minutes 59 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 46.04 feet (Chord Bearing= South 84 Degrees 30 Minutes 57 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 36.53 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 18 Degrees 33 Minutes 58 Seconds East a distance of37.45 feet; thence North 62 Degrees 37 Minutes 20 Seconds East a distance of 245.65 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 45. Degrees 24 Minutes 28 Seconds East a distance of 95.63 feet to a point of curvature; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 86 Degrees 34 Minutes 28 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of37.78 feet (Chord Bearing= South 87 Degrees 15 Minutes 34 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 34.28 feet) to the point of tangency set on the Southwesterly right of way of said trail; thence North 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds West along said Southwesterly right of way line a distance of 58.37 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.



POC :c,,~~.~!~ SOUTH, RANGE J4 EAST, VOUJSIA COUNTY, FUJllDA

•t: 257.91' Nlf'OB'.'°;"[

APPROXIMATE

"""""" <E 20':1: 'MOE DIRT ROAD

""' .... .... PC

NOT TO SCALE POINT Of BEciffNING PONT OF' CCMIEH~T POINT Of CtJ!VA.TURE POINT Of IH9'SECTION " ....

' R/W - POINT Of TANGENCY . .....

RIGHT-OF-WAY

-1- - NOT TO SCAl...E

0 SET 5~ IRON ROO 81 C/11' STAMPED "GCY NC. LS 4108"


NH'Dll'JG"E 2M&IJ'

i

"<."

""~.

soum LINE \_Of SECTION 30

\\£Tl.AND AREA 4 - 18 t;_ CONTAINING 1.0:) ACRES


"' 2'.00' 500"3fl'!:lll"W

" '""' ... ,...., ... "' 20.00' 584'30'.51"£

"'' :m.oo· 58715';)4"[

0 EXISTING 2Ji"~ ROl.IND AUJUIHUM &REAKAWAY MOt«JMENT W/ ~· AWHINW CAP STAMPa> "GCY tlC. LB .. toe"'

........ ,.. QUAR1ER CORNER

30 '

29 ""l ...

31 32

TABLE CHORD DELTA ARC LENGTI-1

32.111' 81'2•'00" ,,_,,,. 37.97' H'<t8'42" 43.11'

3e.&J' 1J1~·~· 40.04'

34.211' 89'34'28" J7.7tf

~~~ BOUNDARY SURVET FOR'

30+29_ S<C- ""'"'"

31 32 INCORPORATED PROP'&S910NAL SURVEYORS AND Mi\PPBRS

tarnnCATI or AUTllD!ll.U:nON UI 411111 -~w oma: fAiJ>U'lllft omcc

1-,-,-+-----.-,.-.-0N-,-----<-,-.-"-1--,-,--< ""..,.~~~it~:~ ..... ·~~~ COPYRIGHT ~ 2006 BY OCT, INC., PROfl:SSIONM. SURVEYORS ANO MAPP(RS

CTY OF llRJS'ALLE VOLUSIA !;OlJNTY, fLORIOA

fh .t Clr...,;..,9 N~·

07-1103-0,-03

~"' 49 ct 54

"" "" "" pC

" PT R R/W

-+- -0

0

.........

L£llljJl


CONTINUED

\llE11.AND Nf£A 4 - 18 COllTAINING 1.115 ACftES

PT

PROPOSED LOCA 1lON OF A4-16 MONITORING \tE.L

"

NOT 10 SCALE CURVE POINT OF 8EQNNNG POINT OF COMMENCEMEJH CURVE RADIUS CHORD BEARING POINT OF CURVA1VR£ POINT OF INmtSECTION Cl ll2a.84' S24't&'oe"W POINT OF TAtfGOICY

""'" C4 2190.05' S1&'•1'00-W RIGHT-OF-WAY

NOT TO SCALE "' 25.00' S&t~'JO"W

SET !'>/a- IRON R00 " CAP .. "'·"' N23"Dll'~

STAMPm "GC'f INC.. LB 41Dll" "' 2200.~· NU1'41'00-C

EXISTING 2,li"icJQ" ROUND AUJIMNUl.I "' 81&.ll4' N2418'08"E BREAKAWAY MONUMENT W/ ~· .w..t.llNUM CAP STAMPm "GCY INC. lB 411>11"

QUARlER CORHER

TABLE CHORD DELTA ARC LENGTH

308.;3' 2$~'00" 370.00'

J97.44' 10'24'44" JD7.ff'

22.lltl' !!.3~'tllt" 23.!'>2'

3'!.311' 90'00'00" JU.27'

35111.H' 10'24'44. 3911.111'

"""' 25"35'00" 311~53'

~~~ BOVNOARY SURVEY roo,

30+29.. S[CTION CORNER

31 32

ND. REVISIONS {)ATE

INCORPORATED PROPISSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

catlntAft Of' Al.lnlOllVonllH LI 410& <lllll"Oll~l(""""

tl'(l'°'lfU'1'0lP ..... ,.,..,... •-C>l>.fl. .... ,

(ICIOl--1-

COP'l'RIGttT C 2006 BY CCY, INC., PROfESSIONAL SUR~YORS ANO MAPPERS

Q7Y OF TI1US\1UE VOlUSlA COUNTY, fLOR!OA

EXHIBIT "B"

MODIFIED TIFA EASEMENTS

J NO.j_


A parcel of land containing 0.05 acres more or less located in Section 5, Township 20 South, Range 34 East, Brevard County, Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida: thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 386.71 feet to the Northeasterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Northeasterly right-of-way line a distance of 8538.21 feet to a point of cutvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 87 Degrees 37 Minutes 38 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 38.23 feet (Chord Bearing = South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 06 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 34.62 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of 210.62 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 75 Degrees 00 Minutes 42 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 32.73 feet (Chord Bearing= North 14 Degrees 55 Minutes 08 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 30.44 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 22 Degrees 35 Minutes 10 Seconds West a distance of 877.70 feet; thence North 67 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing = South 67 Degrees 35 Minutes 09 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 67 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 30.73 feet; thence South 75 Degrees 12 Minutes 45 Seconds East a distance of 151.69 feet; thence South 14 Degrees 47 Minutes 15 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet thence North 75 Degrees 12 Minutes 45 Seconds West a distance of 148.31 feet; thence South 67 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 27.35 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing = South 22 Degrees 24 Minutes 50 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 35.36 feet) to the point of cusp; thence North 22 Degrees 35 Minutes 10 Seconds West a distance of 60.00 feet: to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIO A ~~~ SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

CITY Of llTUS\/IW:

INCORPORATED PROFESSJONAL SUR\IKYORS AND MAPPERS

C£RTll'ICl.Te OF AUTll(IRIU.TION U1 41UH Soolo: Oote: fRo l< Ornwlog N"

•I• 01/29/16 15-1060-01-01 Ornwn By. Checkt<I: Shoe!

"'" " JI 1 ~ 3 J_ J _l DATE I BY REVlS10NS

COPYRIGHT I;) 2006 BY GCY, !NC., PROFESSIONAL SUR\II:YOl<S ANO MAPPERS Orow1ng Nome: A4-2 Sketch & legal-REV 201.".

Surveyor's Notes:

1) This sketch and legal description is based on office infonnation only and does not represent a boundary survey.

2) This legal description shall not be valid unless:

A) Provided in its entirety consisting of 3 sheets, with sheet 3 being the sketch of description.

B) Reproductions of the description and sketch are signed and sealed with an embossed surveyor's seal.

3) Bearings shown hereon are referenced to the South line of Section 30. Said line bears N 88°08'36" E.

Certification

(Not valid without the signature and original raised seal of a Florida licensed Surveyor and Mapper)

I hereby certify that the Sketch and Legal Description of the property shown and described hereon was completed under my direction and said Sketch and Description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

I further certify that this sketch and description meets the Standards of Practice for Surveys set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida State Statutes. The Sketch and Description is based on information furnished by client or client's representative.

1/29/2016 Date of Signature

l 1 R(VlSIONS I oATE IsY

Peter Andersen Professional Surveyor and Mapper

Florida Certificate No. 5199

~~~ INCORPORATED

PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS CERTlPlc.l'l'I! llF AllTffllR!UTJOl'f Lil 4100

SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

CITY OF TIRISVILLE aREVARO COUNTY, FLORIO A

Seo••: i-;olo: J j File .!: Drnwlng No.,

N/A \01/2.9/161 j 15--1060-01-01 (}fown sr.T Chod<e<lo 11 SOee! 1 W"MIPAJl20F"3

COPYRIGHT @ 2006 BY GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS Crowing Noma: A4-2 Sketch ht Logel-REV 201!:

l NO.j_

Wetland Arca 4 - 3 Legal Description

A parcel of land containing 0.69 acres more or less located in Section 5, Township 20 South, Range 34 East, Brevard County, Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Corner of lhe Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 386.71 feel to the Northeasterly right-of:. way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (JOO' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Northeasterly right-of-way line a distance of8538.21 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave toward~ the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle ofR7 Degrees 37 Minutes 38 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of38.23 feet (Chord Bearing= South 83 Degrees 45 Minutes 06 Second~ East, Chord Distance= 34.62 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of23R.13 feet; ; thence South 43 Degrees 51 Minutes 36 Seconds East a distance of J0.06 feet and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 43 Degrees 51 Minutes 36 Seconds East a distance of 1657.68 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly, Easterly and Northeasterly along a cuivc being concave towards the left having a Radius of 132.60 fi::et, a Central Angle of82 Degrees 18 Minutes 33 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 190.49 feet (Chord Bearing= South 85 Degrees 00 Minutes 53 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 174.53 feet) to the point oftangcnr.:y; thence North 53 Degrees 49 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 821. 70 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve heing concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of39.27 feet {Chord Bearing"""" North 08 Degrees 49 Minutes 50 Seconds East, Chord Distance"' 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 36 Degrees 10 Minutes IO Seconds West a distance of54.74 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of84 Degrees 23 Minutes 59 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 36.83 fi::et (Chord Bearing= North 78 Degrees 22 Minutes 24 Seconds West, Chord Dis!ance"""" 33.59 li::et) to the point of tangency; thence South 59 Degrees 25 Minutes 21 Seconds West a distance of 122.80 feet; thence North 30 Degrees 34 Minutes 39 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 fee!; thence North 59 Degrees 25 Minutes 21 Seconds East a distance of I 54.53 fret; thence South 36 Degrees I 0 Minutes I 0 Seconds East a distance of 121.48 feet; thence South 53 Degrees 49 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of856.70 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly, Wesll':rly and Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 142.60 feet, a Central Angle of 82 Degrees 18 Minutes 34 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of204.86 feel (Chord Bearing= North 85 Degrees 00 MinUfes 53 Seconds West, Chord Distance~ 187.69 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 43 Degrees 51 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of 1636.32 feet to a point of curvature; thence Nmthwesterly along a curve being c01\cave towards the left having a Radius of25.00 feet, a Central Angle of83 Degrees 42 Minutes 54 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said cun1e of36.53 feet (Chord Bearing -- Notth 85 Degrees 43 Minutes 05 Seconds Wcs1, Chord Distance = 33.36 feet) to the point of cusp; thence North 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds East a distance of32.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


QlY Of 11TUSVIU£ ~~~ I ~SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

REVISIONS

INCORPORATED l"ROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

CBJIT111CATI! OF AUTRORIUTJON LB 4108 CORPORA"" Of'n•;<

PO eOX , .. , '""'SW 1uJ'1"' ....... P..., arr. ri. ,. .. ,

(llOO)""'-'°''

Sc~

Drowo tly;

"'"

Doto: fl!o & Ornwi<>g No.

01/29/16 15-1060-01-01 Choti<o~ Shoo! J " 1 ~ 3

COPYRIGHT © 2006 BY CCY, INC., PROfESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS D!"<lw•ng Nome: A4-3 Sketch &: Legol-REV 201~

Surveyor's Noles:

1) This sketch and legal description is based on office information only and does not represent a boundary survey.


A)Provided in its entirety consisting of 3 sheets, with sheet 3 being the sketch of description.

B)Reproductions of the description and sketch are signed and sealed with an embossed surveyor's seal.


Certification


t hereby certify that the Sketch and Legal Description of the properly shown and described hereon was completed under my direction and said Sketch and Description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

I further certify that this sketch and description meets the Standards of Practice for Surveys set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027 Florlda ·state Statutes. The Sketch and Description is based on information furnished by client or client's representative.


l l REVISIONS j_ OAlE _l BY



SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

~~~ CITY OF ll1USV1UL 0R(VARD COUNTY. FLORIDA

INCORPORJ.Tl:O PROFESSJONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS So<li•· octe: I rroe <11 Drawing No.:

CERHP!CATI! OF A!T!'llORlliTJON Ul 4108 N/A !!] L PO OO• ;:.-:~':' .":'i.;'i.TIN ""'· , .. ~~&i:.,_~'3.,.E ~OcCo•"•",c,+'o~c;,o~~"/C'J'"1 [~;:1060-01-01

"j':Jj'S.,.":.,,i:'"' "~,~'4,~~~""' MFM PA. 2 Of 3 '-'--'-'--~~~--'--'--~--'

COPYRIGHT © 2006 BY CCY, INC .• PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS Drowln9 Nome: A4-~ Sketch & Legel-REV 201!:

Wetland Area 4 R 7 Legal Description


Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 257 .91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide RIW): thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 8613.23 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 92 Degrees 20 Minutes 57 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.29 feet {Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 36.07 feet) lo the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 1355.17 feet to a point on a curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1345.89 feet, a Central Angle of 03 Degrees 00 Minutes 15 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 70.57 feet (Chord Bearing= South 38 Degrees 33 Minutes 01 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 70.56 feet) to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 44 Degrees 33 Minutes 38 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said Curve of 19.44 feet {Chord Bearing= South 10 Degrees 38 Minutes 13 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 18.96 Feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 11 Degrees 38 Minutes 36 Seconds West a dlstance of 54.1 O feet to a point of intersection; thence South 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 50.76 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of789.00 feet, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 182.68 feet (Chord Bearing= South 12 Degrees 59 Minutes 44 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 182.27 feet) to a point of compound curve; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 371.81 feet, a Central Angle of 30 Degrees 27 Minutes 08 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 197.61 feet (Chord Bearing= South 34 Degrees 51 Minutes 18 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 195.30 feet); thence South 3g Degrees 55 Minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to a po'mt of curvature of a non-tangent curve and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Easterly and Southeasterly along said non-tangent curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 52 Degrees 24 Minutes 46 Seconds and an Arc Length along said curve of 22.87 feet (Chord Bearing = South 65 Degrees 45 Minutes 58 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 22.08 feet) to the point of t;.=mgency; thence south 39 Degrees 33 Minutes 35 Seconds East a distance of 158.1 O feet; thence North 50 Degrees 26 Minutes 25 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 39 Degrees 33 Minutes 35 Seconds West a distance of 158. 10 feel to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 58 Degrees 33 Minutes 28 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 25.55 feet (Chord Bearing= North 10 Degrees 16 Minutes 51 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 24.45 feet) to a point of cusp; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 381.81 feet, a Central Angle of 04 Degrees 45 Minutes 55 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 31.76 feet (Chord Bearing= South 47 Degrees 41 Minutes 54 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 31.75 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


~~~ SK[TCH & !..£CAL FOil:

CITY Of TITUS\llUE BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

INCORPORATED

L l I PR0~=~~1~:~~~~~~::r:.!o!: ,_,,''"~"iA~+m'0°0"f=2'"/c'~'I ";~~1:;:~,~~1 PO"°', ... <1MS ... ·- ""'· '""" """"''""'"-'" Lill[ Dro""' Bj< Chockodo J Sh~ot

_l _l _l "'"' err, n. ,.,,, -...U.Ahl.SS<l.. fL ">JO>

'-'-'-· -"-,.-,---'-'"-"c""cc'cc---cc,.C-'-'-"-'--'-'_, '---'-'--'-~-'-"-' ----'"-'"' _•_•--~ _ _, MFM PA 1 ov 3 COPYRIGHT © 200S SY CCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SUR\lt:YORS A!W MAPPERS Orawmg Nome: A4-7 Sketch & Logal-REV 201~

Surveyor's Notes:

1) This sketch and legal description is based on office infonnation only and does not represent a boundary survey.


A)Provided in its entirety consisting of 3 sheets, with sheet 3 being the sketch of description.

B)Reproductions of the description and sketch are signed and sealed with an embossed surveyor's seal.


Certification



I further certify that this sketch and description meets the Standards of Practice for Surveys set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida State Statutes. The Sketch and Description is based on information furnished by client or client's representative.


J_ 1 REVl!iiONS I DATE IBY



~~~ INCORPORATED

PROFESSJON.U. SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS CER'IIF!ColTE OF olUTllORIU'!'!ON U1 OOD

SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

CITY OF TITUSVILLE BREVARD COUNTY, fLORIDA

COPYRIGHT © 2006 BY GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS Drowm9 Nam"; A4-7 Sketch & LegoJ-REV 201~

l NO._j_



Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 257.91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rall-Trail {100' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 8613.23 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly, Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 92 Degrees 20 Minutes 57 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 40.29 feet (Chord Bearing = South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 36.07 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 1355.17 feet to a point on a curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1345.89 feet, a Central Angle of 03 Degrees 30 Minutes 28 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 82.40 feet (Chord Bearing= South 38 Degrees 17 Minutes 55 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 82.39 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 36 Degrees 32 Minutes 41 Seconds East a distance of 960.68 feet to a point of curvature: thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 714.16 feet, a Central Angle of 31 Degrees 04 Minutes 58 Seconds , and an Arc Length along sald curve of 387.43 feet (Chord Bearing= South 21 Degrees 00 Minutes 12 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 382.70 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 05 Degrees 27 Minutes 43 Seconds East a distance of 809.56 feet lo a point of intersection; thence South 03 Degrees 08 Minutes 40 Seconds East a distance of 660.70 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 04 Degrees 36 Minutes 23 Seconds East a distance of 356.03 feet; thence North 85 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to a point of curvature of a non-tangent curve and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Northeasterly along a curve be!ng concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= North 40 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 85 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds East a distance of 45.70 feet; thence North 78 Degrees 35 Minutes 53 Seconds East a distance of 150.36 feet; thence North 11 Degrees 24 Minutes 07 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 78 Degrees 35 Minutes 53 Seconds West a distance of 149.76 feet; thence South 85 Degrees 23 Minutes 37 Seconds West a distance of 45.10 feet to a point of cusp; thence Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet {Chord Bearing= North 49 Degrees 36 Minutes 22 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 04 Degrees 36 Minutes 23 Seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


l J_ REVlSIONS I OATEIBY

COPYRIGHT © 2000 BY GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS Drawing Namo. A4-9 Sketch & Legal-REV 201~

Surveyor's Notes:



A}Provided in its entirety consisting of 3 sheets, with sheet 3 being the sketch of description.

B) Reproductions of the description and sketch are signed and sealed with an embossed surveyor's seaL


Certification

{Not valid without the signature and original raised seal of a Florida licensed Surveyor and Mapper)


1 further certify that this sketch and description meets the Standards of Practice for Surveys set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida State Statutes. The Sketch and Description is based on information furnished by client or client's representative.


Professional Surveyor and Mapper Florida Certificate No. 5199

~~~ INCORPORATED

PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

J_ l J CERTIFICATE Of' AOTROlllU'!'ION I.JI ~108

""""' =?:"',,:,':;';,~.,. ""'"· 1oo'~w~.i..i.~ANE r.c~J_-1-----~==~-----_J_+~=cj_+~-l PAUJ CHY, FL "'"'' TAlU.tlASSU, n. 3'""' NO. REVISIONS DAi( BY (oooJ 3116-'°"'_:_ (•00) 5:!0-•<!S>

SKETCH &: LEGAL FOR:

CTY OF 111US\llU£ , LsREV/\RD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Seo<e' Oat... n. 6; Dr<>.,lng Na.o

N/A 01/29/16 15-1060-01-01

"'" 2 ~ 3 COPYRIGHi (i";l 2006 BY GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS Drow•ng Nome: A4-9 Sketch & Legol-REV 201~



Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 257.91 feet to the Southwesterly right..af-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right-of-way line a distance of 8613.23 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 92 Degrees 20 Minutes 57 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of40.29 feet (Chord Bearing= South 06 Degrees 14 Minutes 54 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 36.07 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 52 Degrees 25 Minutes 26 Seconds West a distance of 1355.17 feet to a point on a curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 1345.89 feet, a Central Angle of 03 Degrees 00 Minutes 15 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 70.57 feet (Chord Bearing = South 38 Degrees 33 Minutes 01 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 70.56 feet) to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 44 Degrees 33 Minutes 38 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 19.44 feet (Chord Bearing= South 10 Degrees 38 Minutes 13 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 18.96 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 11 Degrees 38 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of 54.10 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 50.76 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 789.00 feel, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 182.68 feet (Chord Bearing= South 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 182.27 feet) to a point of a compound curve; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 371.81 feet, a Central Angle of 39 Degrees 11 Minutes 25 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 254.32 feet (Chord Bearing = South 39 Degrees 13 Minutes 26 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 249.39 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 58 Degrees 49 Minutes 07 Seconds West a distance of 398.98 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 69 Degrees 37 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of 103.64 feet; thence South 58 Degrees 39 Minutes 04 Seconds West a distance of 66.27 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 54 Degrees 45 Minutes 00 Seconds West a distance of 362.42 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 49 Degrees 37 Minutes 24 Seconds West a distance of 137.71 feet; thence South 40 Degrees 22 Minutes 36 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to a cusp; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 126 Degrees 16 Minutes 47 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 55.1 O feet (Chord Bearing= South 67 Degrees 14 Minutes 12 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 44.61 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 04 Degrees 05 Minutes 48 Seconds East a distance of 263.10 feet to a point of intersection: thence South 05 Degrees 56 Minutes 06 Seconds East a distance of 205,63 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 605.00 feet, a Central Angle of 21 Degrees 31 Minutes 49 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of227.34 feet (Chord BearinQ =South 16 Degrees 42 Minutes 00 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 226.01 feet) to the point of reverse curve; thence Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 494.50 feet, a Central Angle of 22 Degrees 33 Minutes 26 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of 194.68 feet (Chord Bearing= South 16 Degrees 11 Minutes 11 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 193.43 feet) to the point of tangency: thence South 04 Degrees 54 Minutes 29 Seconds East a distance of 192. 72 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= South 40 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 85 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seconds West a distance of 394.53 feet; thence South 38 Degrees 41 Minutes 43 Seconds West a distance of 156.98 feet; thence South 51 Degrees 18 Minutes 16 Seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 38 Degrees 41 Minutes 43 Seconds East a distance of 141.98 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 46 Degrees 23 Minutes 49 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 20.24 feet (Chord Bearing = North 61 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 19. 70 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 85 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seconds East a distance of414.53 feet; thence North 04 Degrees 54 Minutes 29 Seconds West a distance of 227.72 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 504.50 feet, a Central Angle of 22 Degrees 33 Minutes 26 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of 198.62 feet, (Chord Bearing= North 16 Degrees 11 Minutes 11 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 197.34 feet) to the point of reverse curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 595.00 feet, a Central Angle of 21 Degrees 31 Minutes 49 Seconds, and an arc length along said curve of 223.58 feet (Chord Bearing= North 16 Degrees 42 Minutes 00 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 222.27 feet) to the point of tangency;

continued on sheet 2

~~~ INCORPORA1'ED

PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANn MAPPERS

SKETCH & LEGAL FOR'

CITY Of 1111.JSVILiE BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Soole: Doto: F"• & Drnwin9 No.:

I J J_ CERTIF1CATE OF J\un!CIHIZATION LB •1ae

,__,_ ____________ J,__"_A_"°_T,_"_"_, P-0 •-0• p~rik~,{~:~" """- ·~=f~"!\f~'c:;J' i-.,,=o,...-!;!""'"'l ~"'"°"""""""--I No.T REVISIONS ., ,,_ "' <~oo)J&HCNI• <••o)SJti-B•~

•/A 01/29/16 15-1060-01-01 Drown fly. C~eci<od: Sheet

""' PA 1 ~ 4 COPYRIGHT © 2006 8Y GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS Draw>ng Nome: A4-15 Sketch & Legol-REV 201

l "'I

continued from sheet 1

Wetland Area 4 • 15 Legal Description

thence North 05 Degrees 56 Minutes 06 Seconds West a distance of 205.47 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 04 Degrees 05 Minutes 47 Seconds West a distance of 306.99 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 53 Degrees 43 Minutes 12 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 23.44 feet (Chord Bearing = North 22 Degrees 45 Minutes 48 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 22.59 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 49 Degrees 37 Minutes 24 Seconds East a distance of 62.83 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 54 Degrees 45 Minutes 00 Seconds East a distance of 361.63 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 58 Degrees 39 Minutes 04 Seconds East a distance of 64.97 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 69 Degrees 37 Minutes 36 Seconds.East a distance of 103.63 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 58 Degrees 49 Minutes 07 Seconds East a distance of 399.93 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 381.81 feet, a Central Angle of 39 Degrees 11 Minutes 25 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 261.16 feet (Chord Bearing = North 39 Degrees 13 Minutes 26 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 256.10 feet) to a point of a compound curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 799.00 feet, a Central Angle of 13 Degrees 15 Minutes 58 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 185.00 feet (Chord Bearing= North 12 Degrees 59 Minutes 44 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 184.58 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 06 Degrees 38 Minutes 50 Seconds East a distance of 50.28 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 131 Degrees 48 Minutes 41 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 57.51 feet (Chord Bearing= North 77 Degrees 32 Minutes 57 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 45.64 feet) to a point of non-tangent line; thence North 36 Degrees 34 Minutes 57 Seconds West a distance of 78.92feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


Surveyor's Notes:



A)Provided in its entirety consisting of 4 sheets, with sheets 3 and 4 being the sketch of description.

B) Reproductions of the description and sketch are signed and sealed with an embossed surveyor's seal.

3) Bearings shown hereon are referenced to the South line of Section 30. Said line bears N 89"08'36" E.

Certification



I further certify that this sketch and description meets the Standards of Practice for Surveys set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter SJ-17, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida State Statutes. The Sketch and Description is based on information furnished by client or client's representative.


lj!j!:"J==--7 Peter Andersen


~~~ SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

CITY Of 111\JSVILLE BRE.VARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

JNCORPORAT'ED PROFESSlONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

CERTIFICATE OY AUTllORTUTION LB ~l08 Sool<: Date· File & Orowin~ ~a.;

l l I DATE I BY REVISIONS

-POR•n: omc~ ro "°' 1<0• • >M~ sw """w """'·

P"'-"OT!'.Ft 3-<'91 (000) --!O ..

N/A Ol/29/16 15-1060-01-01 Orown By; Cheol<ed Sile~\

"™ 2 ~ 4 COPYRIGHT © 2006 BY GCY. INC .. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS Drow!ng Nome: A4-15 Sketch & Legal-REV 201

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION WETLAND AREA 4 - 15

CONTINUED

APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE Of

10':i: WIDE lRAIL ROAD

WETI.AND AREA 4 - 15 CONTAINING

0.81± ACRES

S04"05'48"E 263.10'

S05'56'06"E 205.63'

NTS NOT TO SCALE POB POINT Of BEGINNING POC POINT Of COMMENCEMENT PC POINT Of CURVAlURE PCC POINT Of COMPOUND CURVE Pl POINT OF' INTERSECTION PRC POINT OF REVERS£ CURVE PT POINT Of TANGENCY R RADIUS R/W RIGHT-Of-WAY

-1'- = NOT TO SCALE

0 SET 5/8" IRON ROD & CAP STAMPED "GCY INC. LB 4108"

0 EXISTING 2li"x30" ROUND ALUMINUM BREAKAWAY MONUMENT W/ ~· ALUNINUM CAP STAMPED "GCY INC. LB 4108"

.......... .. QUARlER CORNER

30+29.. SECTION CORNER

31 32

CURVE

C8

C7

C8

C9

cw

Ctl

Cl2

C13

Pl •

RADIUS

25.00'

605;00·

494.50'

25.00'

25.00'

504,50'

595.00'

25.00'

.Pl

N69'37'38"E 103.63'

58'39'049£ 64-,97'

N49'37'24"E 62.83'

N05"56'08"W 205.47'

APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE Of

10'± WIDE 1RAIL ROAO

CURVE TABLE

NOTE 11,;,,d<•W"'!l"°°'""''°P'"'"'" aboo°""""""'Y""" """""

oooK>tolnl<mn•h<m'"''V

CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA ARC lENG1H

S67'14'12"E «.61' 126'16'47" 55.10'

S16'42'00"E 226.01' 21"31'49" 227.34'

S16"11'11"E 193.43' 22'33'28" 194.811'

S40'05'31"W 35.36' 90"00'00" 39.27'

N61'53'37"E 19.70' -46"23'49" 20.24'

N16'11'11"W 197.34' 22"33'28" 198.62'

N16"42'00"W 222..27' 21'31'49" 223.56'

N22'45'48"E 22.59' 53•43•12· 23.#'

~~~ SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

CITY OF 11lUSVlllE BREVARD COUNTY. FLORIDA

REVISED MATCHUNE

REVISED BOUNDARY

03101116 MFM

12118115 MFM

INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

C£R1'1FICA.TE OF AllTHORIZA110N Lil 4108 Soole: o~te: Flle & Ornwing No,o

REVISIONS OATE BY

CORl'ORAll: Offll':E PO ll<l• !<~9 • 150• SW ~AAll!I ~WV. P"'-" cm. fl 3'""

{""") """'-lOOti

1"-600' °"'""By.

""' 01/29 16 15-1060-01-01 Ght<k~O: Sheet

PA 4 ~ 4


A parcel of land containing 0.95 acres more or less localed in Section 31, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County Florida described as follows:

Commence at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast One Quarter of Section 30, Township 19 South, Range 34 East, Volusia County, Florida; thence North 89 Degrees 08 Minutes 36 Seconds East along the South line of said Section 30 a distance of 257.91 feet to the Southwesterly right-of-way line of the East Central Regional Rail-Trail (100' wide R/W); thence South 39 Degrees 55 Minutes 37 Seconds East along said Southwesterly right~of-way line a distance of 1954.95 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southerly and Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 81 Degrees 24 Minutes 09 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 35.52 feet (Chord Bearing= South 00 Degrees 36-Minutes 59 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 32.61 feet) to the point of tangency: thence South 45 Degrees 24 Minutes 28 Seconds West a distance of 98.96 feet to a point of intersectlon; thence South 62 Degrees 37 Minutes 20 Seconds West a distance of 203.29 feet to a point of curvature and call this the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet. a Central Angle of 98 Degrees 48 Minutes 42 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 43.11 feet (Chord Bearing = North 67 Degrees 58 Minutes 18 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 37.97 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 18 Degrees 33 Minutes 58 Seconds West a distance of 63.83 feet; thence South 29 Degrees 32 Minutes 03 Seconds West a distance of 522.53 feet to a point of intersection; thence South 33 Degrees 26 Minutes 47 Seconds West a distance of 580.67 feet to a point of Intersection; thence South 37 Degrees 03 Minutes 38 Seconds West a distance of 573.43 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 828.64 feet, a Central Angle of 25 Degrees 35 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 370.00 feet (Chord Bearing ;::; South 24 Degrees 16 Minutes 08 Seconds West, Chord Distance = 366. 93 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 11 Degrees 28 Minutes 38 Seconds West a distance of 591.1 O feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 2190.05 feet, a Central Angle of 10 Degrees 24 Minutes 44 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 397.99 feet {Chord Bear"1ng =South 16 Degrees 41 Minutes 00 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 397.44 feet) to the point of tangency; thence South 21 Degrees 53 Minutes 22 Seconds West a distance of 782.22 feet; thence South 68 Degrees 06 Minutes 38 Seconds East a distance of 96.42 feet; thence North 57 Degrees 59 Minutes 57 Seconds East a distance of 153.12 feet; thence North 32 Degrees 00 Minutes 03 Seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 57 Degrees 59 Minutes 57 Seconds West a distance of 135.33 feet to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 53 Degrees 53 Minutes 58 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 23.52 feel (Chord Bearing= South 84 Degrees 56 Minutes 39 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 22.66 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 68 Degrees 06 Minutes 38 Seconds West a distance of 43.63 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northwesterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 25.00 feet, a Central Angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 39.27 feet (Chord Bearing= North 23 Degrees 06 Minutes 38 Seconds West, Chord Distance= 35.36 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 21 Degrees 53 Minutes 22 Seconds East a distance of 747.22 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the left having a Radius of 2200.05 feet, a Central Angle of 10 Degrees 24 Minutes 44 Seconds , and an Arc Length along said curve of 399.81 feet (Chord Bearing= North 16 Degrees 41 Minutes 00 Seconds East, Chord 0·1stance = 399.26 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 11 Degrees 28 Minutes 38 Seconds East a distance of 591.10 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve being concave towards the right having a Radius of 818.64 feet, a Central Angle of 25 Degrees 35 Minutes 00 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 365.53 feet (Chord Bearing = North 24 Degrees 16 M'inutes 08 Seconds East, Chord Distance = 362.50 feet) to the point of tangency; thence North 37 Degrees 03 Minutes 38 Seconds East a distance of 573.74 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 33 Degrees 26 Minutes 47 Seconds East a distance of 581.32 feet to a point of intersection; thence North 29 Degrees 32 Minutes 03 Seconds East a distance of 455.65 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly, Easterly and Southeasterly along a curve belng concave towards the right having a Radius of 20.00 feet, a Central Angle of 131 Degrees 53 Minutes 59 Seconds, and an Arc Length along said curve of 46.04 feet (Chord Bearing= South 84 Degrees 30 Minutes 57 Seconds East, Chord Distance= 36.53 feet) to the point of a non-tangent line; thence North 52 Degrees 40 Minutes 53 Seconds East a distance of 10.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.


SKETCH &: LEGAL FOR:

CITY OF llnJSVILlE BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIO A

SoOle: Dote: Fjlo & !Jra,.lng No.:

'/A 05/12/08 07-1103-01-0J Dro"n Py; Cliookod. Sliool

RAM SAB 1 °' 4 COPYRIGHT © 2006 BY GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPfRS Orawm9 Name: A4-16 Skekh &: L .. 9<>1-REV 201

Surveyor's Notes;

1 ) This sketch and legal description is based on office information only and does not represent a boundary survey.


A)Provlded in its entirety consisting of 4 sheets, with sheet 3 and 4 being the sketch of description.

B) Reproductions of the description and sketch are signed and sealed with an embossed surveyor's sea!.

3) Bearings shown hereon are referenced to the South line of Section 30. Said·line bears N 89~08'36" E.

Certification

(Not valid without the signature and original raised seal of a Florida licenSed Surveyor and Mapper)

I hereby certify that the Sketch and Legal Description of the property shown and described hereon was completed under my direclion and said Sketch and Description is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

I further certify that this sketch and description meets the Standards of Practice for Surveys set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 5J-17, Florida Adm·1nistrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida State Statutes. The Sketch and Description is based on information furnished by client or client's representative.



SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

~~~ CITY OF TITUSVILLE

I I REVISIONS I OAT£ ... ! BY

JN CORP ORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS

CERTIFIC.!.TE OF 4UTllOR!ZATlON LB ~106 TA!l.AM...,;,;rt:~

1WO COMMOO••Clll.TH LANE r ............. ssrr. n =

(~)536-84 ..

BREVARD COUNTY,

Seolo: Oole:

N/A 05/12/08 Drown ey. C1'0<ked

RAM "'

FLORIDA

F~e & Oraw"1g No.·

07-1103-01-03 Sh•et

2 w 4 CQPYRIGHT © 2006 BY GCY. INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS Drawing Nome: A4-16 Sketcil & Legel-REV 201

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION WETLAND AREA 4 - 16

CONTINUED

WETI.ANO AREA 4 - 16 CONTAINING

0.95± ACRES

NlS NOT TO SCALE POE! PolNT Of SEGINNING POC f>OINT Of COMMENCEMENT PC PGINT OF aJRVAlURE Pl POINT Of INlERSECTION PT P<llNT Of TANGENCY R RADIUS R/W RIGHT-Of-WAY

-1r- - NOT TO SCALE

0 SET 5/8" IRON ROO & CAP STAMPED "GCY 1NC. LB •108"

0 EXISTING ~·~JO" ROUND ALUMINUM BREAKAWAY MONUMENT W/ 3X" ALUNINUM CAP STAMPED "GCY INC. LB 4108"

~ .. QUAR1ER CORNER

CURVE

C3

" " C6

"' C6

PC

c

PT

N68'0!3'JB"W 43.63'

S57"59'57"W 135.33'

PROPOSED LOCATION OF A4-16 MONITORING WELL

CURVE RADIUS CHORD BEARING

828.64' S2416'0B"W

2190.05' S16"41'00"W

25.00' SB4'58'39"W

25.00' N2J'06'JB"W

2200.05' N16'41'00"'E

818.64' N24'18'08"E

TABLE CHORD DELTA ARC LENGTH

368,93' 25'35'00" 370.00'

397.+4-' 10'24'44" 397,99'

22.66' 53'53'58" 23.52' _j 35.36' 90'00'00" 39.27'

399.26' 10'24'44" 399.81'

362.50' 25'35'00" J65.5J'

30+29"' SECTION CORNER

31 32 ~~~ SKETCH & LEGAL FOR:

2 REVISED MATCHLINE

REVISED BOUNDARY NO. REVISlONS

03/01/16 MFM

12/18/15 MFM DA1E BY

INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS

C£RTIFIC.1.tt OF J,.l!Tf!Oll!ZJ..TION LB "108 COOPOOATE OO'lCE

P<l BOK 146••1'•1» SWMAAllN HW'I. •• ,,,, "''"'·fl. J••., ("00} '86-10<'

ll.UAl<ASSEE Ofl'lCE 1~0 COllMOH'll!:IJ.TI<LmE TAlJ.'-HASSEE.n. J>><>J

(600) 53'-M5'

CITY OF 11TIJS\llU£ BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Sealo: Oa\e: mo & Omwin9 Nu.:

NA 05/12/08 07-1103-01-03 Ore"" Sy. Ct.~•d: so ... t

RAM "" 4 " 4 COPYRIGHT © 2006 BY GCY, INC., PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS Drawing Name: A4-16 Sketch & Legal-REV 201

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

TIFALLC INVOICE APPROVAL BY MANAGERS

WHEREAS, the undersigned are the duly appointed and acting Managers of TIF A LLC, which operates pursuant to that certain Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of TJFA LLC dated May 24, 2010 ("Operating Agreemenf'); and,

WHEREAS, at a duly called and noticed public meeting of the Managers as indicated below, the undersigned approved the contract and/or authorized the expenditure as in,dicated below, and further authorized the managers to execute the Invoice Approval by Managers form reflecting such authorized expenditures in order to process payments.

Previous Authorizations

Imprest Account Reimbursement from Depository ccount

NOW, THEREFORE, the Managers of TIFA LLC, based upon the previous TIFA authorizations, approve the following payments:

ransfer to imprest ccount at Northern Trust nding *8866

Except as othe1wise set forth herein, defined terms shall have the meaning set forth in the Operating Agreement. This Action may be executed in several counterparts, and all counterparts so executed shall constitute one Approval binding on all parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned represent and warrant that each is the duly authorized and appointed agent of TIF A LLC.

Mike Brown, Manager Jim Ball, Manager

Date: ________ , 2016 Date: ________ , 2016

8:57 AM TIFA LLC 04/20/16 Check Detail

March 10 through April 20, 2016

Type Num Date Name Item Account Paid Amount Original Amount ---Bill Pmt -Check 1156 04/06/2016 Florida Power & Li ... 103.00 · Cash- Nori ... -5,306.78

Bill 11526 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -345.90 345.90 Bill 54213 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -356.13 356.13 Bill 75317 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -471.94 471.94 Bill 83665 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 ·Utilities -257.35 257.35 Bill 73681 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 ·Utilities -226.05 226.05 Bill 62400 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -230.24 230.24 Bill 40983 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -226.99 226.99 Bill 24869 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -279.13 279.13 Bill 09060 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -238.00 238.00 Bill 76646 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 ·Utilities -400.18 400.18 Bill 74008 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -341.11 341.11 Bill 54996 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -400.91 400.91 Bill 47893 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -427.13 427.13 Bill 32610 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 ·Utilities -539.91 539.91 Bill 18790 ... 04/01/2016 511.00 · Utilities -565.81 565.81

TOTAL -5,306.78 5,306.78

Bill Pmt -Check 1157 04/08/2016 Renegade Testing ... 103.00 ·Cash- Nort ... -1,168.00

Bill 16-0696 03/31/2016 501.50 · O&M Parts ... -1,168.00 1,168.00

TOTAL -1,168.00 1, 168.00

Check 1158 04/13/2016 Cardm~nnber Service 103.00 · Cash- No rt ... -1,064.89

203.50 · Northan Tr ... -1,064.89 1,064.89

TOTAL -1,064.89 1,064.89

Bill Pmt -Check 1159 04113/2016 The City of Titusville 103.00 ·Cash- Nert. .. -3,059.35

Bill R-259 03/02/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper. .. -566.45 566.45 Bill R-260 03/09/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... -284.53 284.53 Bill R-261 03116/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... -253.21 253.21 Bill R-262 03/23/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... -347.18 347.18 Bill R-263 03/24/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... 441.15 441.15 Bill D-22 03/25/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... -347.18 347.18 Bill R-264 03/30/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... -472.47 472.47 Bill R-265 03/31/2016 501.00 · O&M Oper ... -347.18 347.18

TOTAL -3,059.35 3,059.35

Page 1

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

6:23 PM

04/19/16 Accrual Basis

ASSETS Current Assets

Checking/Savings

TIFA LLC Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2016

102.00 · Cash-Northern Trust Company 103.00 •Cash-Northern Trust Operating

Total Checking/Savings

Accounts Receivable 104.00 · Accounts Receivable

Total Accounts Receivable

Other Current Assets 105.00 · Prepaid Insurance

Total Other Current Assets

Total Current Assets

Other Assets 110.00 ·Consumptive Use Permit 110.50 · CUP Accumulated Amortization 115.00 ·FPL Fee 115.50 ·FPL Fee Accumulated Amert. 120.00 · Easements 125.00 · Mitigation Credit 130.00 · Monitoring Wells 130.50 ·AID Monitoring Wells 135.00 · Area IV Wellfield Phase 1 135.50 · AID • Wellfield Phase 1 140.00 ·Area JVWellfield Phase 2 140.50 · AID - Wellfield Phase 2 150.00 · Wellfield Assets-Inactive

Total Other Assets

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES & EQUITY Liabilities

Current liabilities Accounts Payable

201.01 · A/P Trade 202.00 · Contract Payable

Total Accounts Payable

Credit Cards 203.50 · Northen Trust Credit Card

Total Credit Cards

Total Current Liabilities

Total Liabilities

Equity 301.00 · Contributed Capital - City 302.00 · Contributed Capital - Farmton 303.00 · Member's Equity Net Income

Total Equity

TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY

Mar 31, 16

1,039,868,93 25,000.00

1,064,868.93

100,029.98

100,029.98

25,232.45

25,232.45

1,190,131.36

1,981 ,386.49 -350,870.52 871,451.54 -60,523.82 344,608.00 139,200.00 486,682.60 -44,504.12

1,814,563.28 -204,649.10

5,036,025.27 -67,253.50 164,932.50

10,111,048,62

. 11,301, 179.98

4,227.35 334,187.18

338,414,53

1,064,89

1,064.89

339,479.42

339,479.42

5,248,333.49 5,248,333.50

346,063.14 118,970.43

10,961,700.56

11,301, 179.98

Page 1

10:44AM

04/15/16

Accrual Basis

TIFA LLC Profit & Loss Budget vs. Actual

January through March 2016

Jan~ Mar 16 Budget

Income 401.00 ·Water Sales 266,682.57 298, 149.51 402.00 · Interest I Dividends 13.02 3.00

Total Income 266,695.59 298, 152.51

Gross Profit 266,695.59 298,152.51

Expense 501.00 • O&M Operating Agreement 7,134.13 10,850.01 501.50 · O&M Parts & Labor 2,232.89 4,550.01 502.01 · Consulting 0.00 250.02 502.02 ·Accounting 9,546.00 4,000.02 502.03 · Legal 0.00 1,250.01 502.04 · Hydrogeological Services 0.00 1,875.00 503.00 · Managing Agent Fees 6,500.01 6,500.01 504.00 • Insurance (P&C I Liability) 19,953.21 19,236.51 505.00 · Miscellaneous Expense 0.00 125.01 506.00 · Depreciation Wellfield 60,900.30 61,560.75 507.00 ·CUP Amortization 24,767.34 24,767.25 507.10 ·FPL Amortization 7,262.10 7,262.01 508.00 · Wetland Monitoring Expense 0.00 919.77 511.00 ·Utilities 9,429.18 30,325.02 513.00 · Other Taxes 0.00 8,200.02

Total Expense 147,725.16 181,671.42

Net Income 118,970.43 116,481.09

$ Over Budget

-31,466.94 10.02

-31,456.92

-31,456.92

-3,715.88 -2,317.12

-250.02 5,545.98

-1,250.01 -1,875.00

0.00 716.70

-125.01 -660.45

0.09 0.09

-919.77 -20,895.84

-8,200.02

-33,946.26

2,489.34

Page 1

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Event Timeline for Wellhead Leaks

9/30/201S

10/9/201S

10/14/201S

10/1S/201S

10/16/201S

10/19/201S

11/16/201S

11/17/201S

11/17/201S

11/24/201S

12/7/201S

12/14/201S

12/16/201S

12/16/201S

12/30/201S

12/30/201S

1/S/2016

1/7/2016

1/21/2016

1/26/2016

1/28/2016

2/4/2016

3/4/2016

Footnotes:

Final Completion Cert - WR-4, -8 & -9

CPH Notifies Felix of Weld Leaks at WR-4 & -9

AWD Repairs Weld Leaks at WR-9

AWD Repairs Weld Leaks at WR-2 & -4; Thread Leak at WR-4 Reported

CPH Notifies Felix ofThread Leak at WR-4

Final Completion Cert- WR-1, -2, -3, -6 &-7

City notices leaks on WR-1, -2 & -6

City notices leaks on WR-7; City Notifies CPH of issues with WR-1, -2, -3, -4, -6 & -7

CPH Notifies Felix of Weld Leaks at WR-1, -2, -3, -6, -7 & Thread Leak at WR-4

AWD Repairs Weld Leaks at WR-1, -2, -6 (two leaks) & -7; Thread Leak at WR-4 & -7 Reported

Substantial Completion Cert -WR-SA; Felix Repairs Thread Leak at WR-7

Felix Repairs Thread Leak at WR-4

Final Completion Cert - WR-SA

Boyd Notifies CPH of Weld Leak at WR-4

AWD Repairs Weld Leaks at WR-4

CPH Notifies Felix of Thread Leak at WR-4 following AWD Weld Repair

CPH Notifies Felix Not to Remove Pressure Sensor from WR-4

City Notifies CPH of City Review of Leaks and Weld Workmanship

City Emails CPH the Damage Notice & Corrective Action Plan for Comment

CPH Signs Engineer Certificate for Felix Final Payment Application

CPH Issues Opinion to TIFA that Felix Contract is in Warranty Phase

CPH Issues to Felix Notice of Wellhead Damages

Felix Issues Reply to Notice of Wellhead Damages

[1] From email correspondence records

[2] From City Inspector field notes

Revised 3/23/16

[1]

[1]

[1] [2]

[1] [2]

[1]

[1] [2]

[1] [2]

[1]

[1] [2]

[1] [2]

[1] [2]

[1]

[1] [1]

[1]

[1]

[1] [1]

[1] [1]

[1] [1]

Jantzer, Andrew

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Katriina,

Ben Miller <[email protected] > Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:13 PM Bowman, Katriina (P.E.) Stauffer, Sean; Jantzer, Andrew; Jim Boyd; Morris, David; Kenny Sandow RE: Wellhead Assembly Issues - Requested Plan of Action - Area IV Ph. 2 Well

Outfitting and Raw WM

We would like to clarify that the welded SS wellhead assemblies referenced below are the 12" x 611 SS f lange reducers. Felix's Plan of Action with regards to TIFA's requests are in red:

Based on all of the above observations, TIFA requests the following Repair Work be conducted by Felix at Felix's expense (unless otherwise noted, see Item No. 2):

1. In order to address concerns that the instruments and appurtenances may have internal damage from improper wrenching procedures, heat damage from field welding repairs, or thread damage from repeated tightening cycles, it is requested that the existing level sensors and pressure transducers, including associated instrument cables and mounting adapters, be replaced with new items. There currently has been no evidence that there is any damage to the instruments and appurtenances. The existing level sensors and pressure transducers, including associated instrument cables and mounting adapters wi ll be disconnected and/or removed as necessary to replace the welded SS wellheads. We will inspect, reinstall and verify calibration and operation such that they are all working as intended.

2. In order to address the aforementioned pressure transducer clearance issues, TIFA wishes to relocate the pressure transducers to the ductile iron spool piece located above the flow meter. This connection can be made with a Mueller Series DR2S service saddle (see attached cut sheet) and the aforementioned Diaphragm x NPT adapter (WIKA Part #2252651, see attached cut sheet). Since this is an Owner-requested relocation, TIFA is willing to pay for the new service saddle and longer section of flexible electrical conduit, as well as the instrument recalibration work associated with the relocation of the pressure transducers. However, the new pressure transducer and mounting adapter would be provided by Felix as requested in Item No. 1 above. This is a design change that Felix will implement. Felix will add the Mueller Series DR2S service saddle ($560), Bellwether Electric wi ll extend the wiring and flexible electrical conduit ($180) and Curry Controls will recalibrate the pressure transducers ($840) for a fee of $1 ,580 per well , based on only being able to do two wells at a time.

3. Due to defective shop weld integrity as evidenced by failed welded connections and leaks observed to shop welds, and substandard weld repairs that have resulted in permanently damaged wellhead assemblies, TIFA believes that all nine (9) SS wellhead assemblies should be replaced so that the resulting installation is in a new and undamaged condition. For quality control purposes, the replacement shop fabricated SS wellhead assemblies should be manufactured under controlled welding shop conditions and pressure tested prior to delivery. Felix should submit shop drawings for the replacement assemblies for review and approval prior to fabrication. The shop drawings should include appropriate materials and welding specifications. The fabricated SS wellhead assemblies should also include new transition fittings for the level sensor cable connections, since TIFA is concerned that the existing transition fittings may have been damaged during field welding. Without admitting the validity of your assertions and in an effort to amicably resolve these issues, AWD wi ll replace all nine (9) SS wellhead assemblies with new assemblies manufactured under controlled welding shop conditions and pressure tested prior to delivery. Once this Plan of Action is approved , AWD will submit shop drawings. The transition fittings for the level sensor cable connections will be removed as necessary to replace the welded SS wellheads. We will inspect, reinstall and verity they are working as intended.

4. It will be necessary to remove the well pump in order to remove the existing wellhead assembly, and once the assembly is removed, there will be no way to support the pump. Therefore, TIFA expects that the replacement SS wellhead assemblies would be shop fabricated and delivered to the site prior to removing the existing assemblies. Under this circumstance, the new assembly would be installed immediately after removal of the existing assembly, thus enabling the pump to be reinserted into the well that same day. Replacement SS wellhead

1

assemblies will be delivered to the site prior to removing the existing assemblies. New assemblies would be installed the same day as the removal of the existing assembly.

5. Felix will need to disinfect and conduct bacteriological testing of the wells after the pumps are reinserted. Also, since the pump and instrumentation will be affected by this repair work, it will be necessary for Felix to demonstrate proper functioning of the reassembled well in regard to the pump and the flow, level and pressure sensing instruments. Felix will disinfect the new SS wellhead assemblies and conduct the 2 days of bacteriological testing upon re installation .

6. In regard to the timing of the repairs, please be advised that the repairs are to be scheduled at no more than two wells at any given time. Only two wells will be out of service at any given time.

As previously mentioned, please provide a proposed Plan of Action for resolving these wellhead assembly issues. The Plan of Action should include the approximate scheduling for installing all items addressed in this correspondence, with the understanding that TIFA wishes the work to be completed as expeditiously as possible. The Plan of Action should also include the proposed costs for the equipment and services that will funded by the Owner under Item No. 2.

Plan of Action: 1. Obtain approva l for costs associated with relocation of pressure transducer.

2. Submit SS we llhead submittal from AWD for approva l. 3. Upon approval, AWD will need 3 weeks to procure the materials, fabricate the wellheads, and pressure test. 4. Once the replacement SS we llheads are tested and available, we w ill schedu le the shutdown of two wells. On a

Monday, Fel ix, Bellwether and AWD will coordinate the removal and replacement of the SS wellheads and

relocation of the pressure transducer on both wells. On Tuesday, Felix and Curry wou ld be on site to verify ca libration and operation of the equipment. The Wednesday and Thursday would be the BSPs. Results should be available on Saturday. This would repeat for 5 weeks until al l 9 wells are repaired .

Please advise if this is acceptable.

Please let us know if you have any questions concerning the above.

Katriina Ph. 407-322-6841 Ext. 1019 E-Mail: [email protected]

From: Ben Miller [mailto: [email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 9:09 AM To: Bowman, Katriina (P.E.) Cc: [email protected]; Jim Boyd; Morris, David Subject: RE: Final Pay Application - Area IV Ph. 2 Well Outfitting and Raw WM

J<atriina, Were there any issues with the fin al paperwork or do you have what you need t o approve final payment?

Please reply. Thanks,

Ben

2

April 12, 2016

Mr. Sean L. Stauffer, P.E. Water Resources Director I Construction Project Manager City of Titusville I TIFA LLC 2836 Garden Street Titusville, Florida 32796

VIA E-Mail to [email protected]

Re: Area IV Phase 2 Well Outfitting and Raw Water Transmission Main CPH Job No. T3909.03

Dear Sean:

500 tVesl Fulton Street Sanford, PL 32771

Phone: 407.322.6841 Fax: 407.330.0639

This letter is in response to two separate sets of correspondence from the City of Titusville on 3130116 and from the City I TIFA LLC on 418116 concerning the Area IV Phase 2 Well Outfitting and Raw Water Transmission Main project. Comments from the correspondence are repeated below, followed by our response.

From City E-mail Received on 3130116:

1 . A review of the conformed construction documents indicate wellhead design includes stainless steel pipe coupled by welds, threads and mechanical couplings. However, beyond drawing ca/louts for 316 stainless steel, TIFA is unable to locate standards and specifications for the manufacture and construction of the welded stainless steel wellhead pipe. For example, the specifications for the Well Drilling Contract cite a number of standards including AWWA C200, Standard for Steel Water Pipe, 6 Inches or Larger; and AWWA C206, Standard for Field Welding of Steel Water Pipe. Also, Section 02511 of the Phase 2 Well Outfitting Specifications assign pipe wall thickness and pressure classes to numerous types of pipe and appurlenances.

a. Is CPH aware of standards conveyed to the Phase 2 Well Outfitting· Contractor for the manufacture and construction of the welded stainless steel wellhead pipe, and if so, what are they?

Response: This has previously been addressed to the TIFA-Miami Corporation ("T-MC") representative. Per e-mail sent to the T-MC representative and the City on 3111116, no specific standards I qualifications (on the welding) were required. However, the Contractor is required to conform to industry standard practice for 316 stainless steel material and installation including welding. The plans and specifications used for the Area IV Ph. 2 wellfield are the same that were used for the Area IV Phase 1 wellfield, and have also been used successfully for multiple wellfield projects throughout the State. It is not typical for the "manufacture" of the pipe to be addressed beyond reference to the ASTM standard (in this case ASTM 316 stainless steel pipe). ASTM standards are used so as to not have the need to dictate pipe manufacturing requirements that differ from standard industry practice. Additionally, please note that for the Phase 1 project the City provided to CPH a drawing dated 7127109 which shows the wellhead piping and indicated "stainless steel flange welded to stainless steel pipe" and "glued schedule 80 PVC companion flange". CPH added the requirement for the stainless steel pipe to be ASTM 316 and in consultation with the City changed the companion flange from glued PVC to stainless steel (welded to the casing).

Mr. Sean L. Stauffer, P.E. Water Resources Director I Construction Project Manager City of Titusville I TIFA LLC April 12, 2016 Page 2 of6

b. If CPH did not provide this Contractor with instructions regarding the manufacture and construction of the welded stainless steel wellhead pipe, why not?

Response: As indicated in the previous response, it is not necessary to address pipe manufacturing beyond reference to ASTM 316. The note requiring the pipe and base plate I fiange to be welded is typically sufficient since the implication is that welding of stainless steel pipe to a stainless steel flange is to be in accordance with standard industry practice.

2. A review of the shop drawing records indicate that beyond Submittal 035 for the pressure transmitter connector, there were no shop drawings for the manufacture and construction of the welded stainless steel wellhead pipe.

a. Is CPH aware of shop drawing information other than Submittal 035 provided by the Well Outfitting Contractor for the manufacture and construction of the welded stainless steel wellhead pipe, and if so, what is it?

Response: This has been addressed previously. There are no shop drawings I submittals that address this.

b. If CPH did not require the Well Outfitting Contractor to provide shop drawings regarding the manufacture and construction of the welded stainless steel wellhead assemblies, why not?

Response: The lack of a submittal on the base plate and stainless steel pipe was overlooked, not only by CPH, but all of the other parties who reviewed shop drawings and submittals. There were over 140 submittals for the project; we endeavor to make sure all major items are addressed.

3. Contract Book Section 4 states, "All workmanship shall be first class and by persons qualified in the respective trades necessary to properly complete the Contract." As Engineer of Record for the Well Outfitting Contract, CPH performed progress inspections and milestone inspections. Substantial Completion Certificates were issued for most of the wells in August 2016. Certificates of Final Completion were issued for the wells in September, October and December 2015, which accepted the Work "excluding latent defects." The detected wellhead leaks and Contractor repairs spanned from October to December 2015. On 0112112016, the TIFA representatives provided CPH with a detailed, written notice of suspected systemic defects with the wellhead Work, and proposed that the Contractor be requested to replace the wellheads and affected instrumentation. On 0112612016, CPH executed an Engineer Certification of the Final Payment application certifying the Contractor is due final payment based on on-site observations. Considering the events and timeline:

a. What types of inspections and testing were conducted to determine that the welded stainless steel wellheads and wellhead assemblies were acceptable and complete?

Response: Primary inspections throughout construction were by the City/TIFA not CPH. The City/TIFA had full time inspectors versus CPH's extremely limited inspection time. The CPH


inspections were budgeted at 13 hours per week for 36 weeks. The actual construction time, based on the start offield work on 8/11 /14, suspension of Work by the Contractor on 8/29/14, resumption of suspended Work on 10120114, and substantial completion on the last well (Well WR-5A) on 1217115, results in over 61 weeks of Work. This equates to less than 1 day per week on average for the inspections and travel time to and from the site. Per the Scope of Services (paragraph 2.7. 7): " ... The CONSUL TANT's limited inspection services consist of periodic visits to the work site to observe the progress and report to TIFA as to the amount of work complete, the overall quality of executed work, and observed impediments to the successful contract completion ... The CONSUL TANT will observe work during execution to observe construction methods and techniques, and will selectively observe delivered materials on-site (not including materials testing) as to compliance with the Contract Documents ... Through on-site observations of the work in progress and field checks of installed work, materials and equipment, the CONSUL TANT will endeavor to provide further protection for TIFA against defects and deficiencies in the work, but this inspection and observation work shall not make the CONSUL TANT responsible to find or note all discrepancies in the work nor for the Contractor's failure to perform the construction work in accordance with the plans, specifications or other contract documents ... ". Responses to items below further address inspections that were conducted.

b. On what basis did CPH certify that the welded stainless steel wellhead pipe, wellhead assemblies and completed repairs complied with the Contract and justified release of retainage and final payment?

Response: This was previously addressed to the City and T-MC representatives during our conference call on 2/3/16. As pay applications are processed, Work at each well site for which the Contractor is requesting payment is reviewed in the field by representatives of the City, TMC, CPH, and the Contractor. Work at all Wells except WR-5A was field reviewed and included in Applications for Payment No. 5 (period ending date of 4/30/15) through No. 8 (period ending date of 7/31/15). Therefore, Work at all Wells except WR-5A was initially field reviewed by all parties (not just CPH) from April through July 2015 at the time the Contractor submitted an application for payment (day to day inspection was by the City/TIFA, not CPH). Once the well construction was complete, the wells were then disinfected and tested, with the wells pumping at approximately 100 GPM over a period of 8 days during the bacteriological testing (some wells were run more than 8 days). Following testing and receipt of clearance to place the wells into service from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), start-up of the wells took place. The primary inspection of the completed wells takes place during the start-up of the wells. Except for Well WR-5A, the start-up for the wells took place between 815/15 and 9/8/15 (the startup for well WR-5A took place on 12/7/15). During start-up, the wells are run and the visible components at the well are reviewed, including the pipe, fittings and valves. Start-up also includes electrical and controls, running off a generator, and running the pumps at various speeds. At all wells, no visible leaks or signs of leaks (such as stains or rust) were noted. When final inspection of each well takes place, the items that were on the punch list are reviewed (no leaks were apparent).


As noted during the 2/3/16 conference call, the Final Application for Payment (Application for Payment No. 12) was for retainage release and some of the Work that had not previously been paid in full such as mobilization and invasive plant species post construction inspections. There was also minor Work at Well WR-5A that was included. This Work for the application for payment (at Well WR-5A) was field reviewed by CPH and representatives of the City and T-MC on 12/7/15. The review of the Work on the Application for Payment would not include wells that had already been turned over to Tl FA (TIF A took over ownership and operation of the wells except for Well WR-5A between 10/1/15 and 10/22/15; and began ownership and operation of Well WR-5A on 12/17/15). The first draft of Application for Payment No. 12 was received from the Contractor on 12/24/15 (CPH forwarded the draft application for payment to the City and TMC representative on 12/24/15). On 1/2/16, the City sent the following e-mail to CPH: "TIFA would like to have the final invoice from Felix during the first week of January so that TIFA can. book the Phase 2 construction to fixed assets prior to our yearly audit. Please work with them to meet the deadline". This e-mail from the City implies the application for payment needs to be processed as soon as possible. CPH responded to the City on 1/4/16 indicating: "Has TIFA paid Felix for the prior application for payment? Usually the delay is Felix getting Lien Rel. from all of the subs and suppliers and cannot get these until A) Felix is paid by TIFA; and B) Felix then pays the subs I suppliers". On 1 /5/16, the Contractor provided the full application package (via e-mail to CPH, the City, and T-MC representative). CPH responded to the Contractor and copied the City and T-MC representative that the retainage column needed to be corrected, the list of subs/suppliers needed to be corrected, and asked the Contractor: "When do you anticipate providing Final Releases of Lien and the Consent of Surety to Final Payment?" Additional e-mails concerning the Final Application for payment were sent to the Contractor and copied to the City and T-MC representative on 1/5/16, 1113/16, and 1/18/16. At no time did the City or T-MC representative indicate that well leaks I wellhead repairs needed to be conducted before the Application for Payment could be processed. When the Final Application for Payment was received from the Contractor on 1 /26/16, it was recommended for approval by CPH since the field review had taken place with all parties on 12/7/15, and the required Final Lien Releases and Consent of Surety to Final Payment were received. Had we known the City wanted well repairs to be addressed before processing the Final Application for Payment, we would have notified the Contractor during the numerous reviews that took place in January. As stated in the 2/3/16 conference call, we considered repairs to the wells to be warranty work. This is based on standard construction practice and is in accordance with e-mail from the City on 12/30/15 where the City indicated "The City has Well 4 shut down due to the leak and is requesting the Contractor to fix the leak as a warrantv repair".

4. CPH previously advised that the welding-related defects should be addressed as a warranty phase claim because TIFA has taken ownership, is operating the wells and has received the Material and Workmanship bonds. What is your opinion on whether the "excluding latent defects" clause in the Final Completion Certificate classifies the correction of welding defects as Work under the original construction contract, and therefore enables the Owner to require correction of newly discovered defects prior to final payment/re/ease of retainage. Is that not the purpose for the latent defects clause?


Response: The well leaks are a latent defect since they were not apparent until after the wells had been in operation. It is the City who called the leaks "a warranty repair". As indicated during our 2/3/16 conference call, warranty repairs are typically brought to the attention of the Contractor, and in the event the Contractor refuses to address the repairs, the Owner (in this case TIFA LLC) can look to the Maintenance Bond for repair work to be conducted. At no point during the review process for the Final Application for Payment did the City or T-MC representatives indicate that they wanted the repairs to be addressed before the Final Application for Payment could be processed. We had no reason to suspect that the Contractor would not address well leak repairs as they had responded to all previous City requests for leak repairs starting in October.

From City/TIFA Letter Dated on 4/8/16:

In response to Felix's assertion that TIFA 's concerns are "speculation," as you are aware TIFA hired an independent inspection/testing company to evaluate the wellhead assemblies.

Response: The response from Felix was specific to heat damage (they indicate "Your "concerns" of heat damage to various system components is speculation'). The independent testing company evaluated the welds and it is not apparent they evaluated the entire wellhead assembly.

The Contract required that the materials and equipment furnished would be of the best quality and free from defects. Apparently, this work was not free from defects and according to the Report, the defects should have been obvious.

Response: We do not agree that the defective welds should have been obvious and if so they would have been discovered by the City/TIFA full time inspection personnel. When the welds were new when the start-ups took place between 8/5/15 and 9/8/15 (all wells except WR-5A) and on 12/7/15 (Well WR-5A), no visible surface defects were apparent. Over time, weathering (temperature and exposure) and operational pressures can expose a latent defect. We have further conformed with licensed welders and inspectors that a new weld that does not leak cannot be looked at and determined to be defective (unless there are obvious surface issues of which none were noted during start-up). When the inspections and x-raying of the welds took place on 3/24/16, those welds were not the same as what was reviewed during start-up as the welds had since been repaired (in some cases more than once) and subjected to weathering. The City inspectors were present during the weld repair work (CPH was not present during either the initial welding or the weld repair work). CPH had not field reviewed the welds since start-up took place and were accepted by all parties last year.

Despite these deficiencies, CPH issued a "Certification of Engineer" to TIFA stating that "based on on-site observations ... the work ... has been performed in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents and the Contractor is entitled to payment." It is not clear why CPH issued this Certification.

Mr. Sean L. Stauffer, P.E. Water Resources Director I Construction Project Manager City of Titusville I TIFA LLC April 12, 2016 Page 6 016

Response: As indicated above, the City and T-MC representatives had approved the proposed application for payment based on the 12/7/15 field review; the City called the repairs "warranty work"; the City and T-MC representative were copied on numerous final application for payment correspondence to the Contractor; the City I Tl FA asked that the final application for payment be submitted in January; and at no point did the City or TIFA indicate the well repair work needed to be addressed prior to processing the Final Application for Payment (in lieu of handling as warranty repair work that is done either by the Contractor or under the Bond if the Contractor fails to make the repair).

In light of the inspection report received from Renegade, ii would seem to be important that CPH reassess its conclusions and discuss appropriate steps to insure proper completion of the project.

Response: There appears to be some confusion on what "conclusions" CPH has made to date. As indicated above, the Final Application for Payment that was processed by CPH was in accordance with City and T-MC instructions to expedite the application for payment and to consider the repairs to be warranty work. Does the City I TIFA have the right to withhold payment from the last Application for Payment due to "latent defects"? In our opinion, the answer is yes although you should obtain a legal opinion. The next steps that TIFA could undertake are: 1) Provide the report on the welds from Renegade Testing and Inspection, Inc. to the Contractor; 2) Indicate that in light of the defective welds that TIFA will withhold payment from the Contractor until the welds are repaired; 3) Require the Contractor to pay for the testing of the defective welds and subsequent re-inspection and testing; 4) request an extended warranty on the well heads that are repaired; 5) request qualifications on the welder who will be conducting the repair work; and 6) request proposed weld repair procedures (to be submitted by the Contractor for approval).

We hope the above satisfactorily addresses the City's I TIFA's questions. Should you need additional information from us, please let us know.

Sincerely, CPH, Inc.

#f~ N. Katriina Bowman, P.E., CCS Vice President/Associate

Cc: Andrew Jantzer, P.E. - City of Titusville (Via E-Mail) Jim Boyd, P.E. (Via E-Mail)