75
Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013 Four principles of medical ethics Autonomy Beneficence Non-maleficence Social Justice Three elements of informed consent Voluntariness Information Competence

Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

  • Upload
    liv

  • View
    39

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013. Four principles of medical ethics Autonomy Beneficence Non-maleficence Social Justice Three elements of informed consent Voluntariness Information Competence. When the Patient is Incompetent. Guardian Probate court - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Medical Ethics and ProfessionalismReview of Part 1 February 11 2013

Four principles of medical ethicsAutonomyBeneficenceNon-maleficenceSocial JusticeThree elements of informed consentVoluntarinessInformation Competence

Page 2: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

When the Patient is Incompetent

Guardian Probate court Guardian of person or estate or both

Advance directive Specifies what is to be done in the event patient is unable

to make a decision Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care

Who will make decision Living Will

Specifies particular decisions, e.g., ventilators Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care includes both

Power of Attorney and Living Will provisions (posted on ethics site, First Year)

Page 3: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care

GUIDANCE FOR HEALTH CARE AGENT When making health care decisions for me, my health care

agent should think about what action would be consistent with past conversations we have had, my treatment preferences as expressed in PART TWO (if I have filled out PART TWO), my religious and other beliefs and values, and how I have handled medical and other important issues in the past. If what I would decide is still unclear, then

My health care agent should make decisions for me that my health care agent believes are in my best interest, considering the benefits, burdens, and risks of my current circumstances and treatment options.

Page 4: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Substituted Judgment v Best Interests

Substituted judgment – for persons who have been competent to express a choice but who presently lack capacity Dementia Delirium Severe mental illness

Best interests standard – for persons never competent to have decided Children Mentally retarded/developmentally disabled Or when there is no information as to what the person

would have decided

Page 5: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care

PART TWO will be effective if I am in any of the following conditions: A terminal condition, which means I have an incurable

or irreversible condition that will result in my death in a

relatively short period of time, and/or; A state of permanent unconsciousness, which means I

am in an incurable or irreversible condition in which I am

not aware of myself or my environment and I show no behavioral response to my environment.

To be determined by personal and second physician

Page 6: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care

Try to extend my life for as long as possible, using all medications, machines, or other medical procedures that in reasonable medical judgment could keep me alive. If I am unable to take nutrition or fluids by mouth, then I want to receive nutrition or fluids by tube or other medical means, OR;

Allow my natural death to occur. I do not want any medications, machines, or other medical procedures that in reasonable medical judgment could keep me alive but cannot cure me. I do not want to receive nutrition or fluids by tube or other medical means except as needed to provide pain medication, OR;

Page 7: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care

I do not want any medications, machines, or other medical procedures that in reasonable medical judgment could keep me alive but cannot cure me, except as follows:

[Initial each statement that you want to apply to option (C).] If I am unable to take nutrition by mouth, I want to receive nutrition by tube or

other medical means. If I am unable to take fluids by mouth, I want to receive fluids by tube or other

medical means. If I need assistance to breathe, I want to have a ventilator used. If my heart or pulse has stopped, I want to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) used.

Page 8: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Default Surrogate Decisionmakers I

If a decisionmaker is not specified or is not available: § 31-9-2. Persons authorized to consent to surgical or medical

treatment (a) any one of the following persons is empowered to consent: (1) Any [competent] adult, for himself or herself, whether by living

will, advance directive for health care, or otherwise; (1.1) Any person authorized to give such consent for the adult under

an advance directive for health care or durable power of attorney for

health care (2) In the absence or unavailability of a living spouse, any parent,

whether an adult or a minor, for his or her minor child; (3) Any married person, whether an adult or a minor, for himself or

herself and for his or her spouse;

Page 9: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Default Surrogate Decisionmakers II

(4) Any person temporarily standing in loco parentis, whether formally

serving or not, for the minor under his or her care; and any guardian, for his or

her ward; (5) Any female, regardless of age or marital status, for herself when

given in connection with pregnancy, or the prevention thereof, or childbirth;

or (6) Others (A) Any adult child for his or her parents; (B) Any parent for his or her adult child; (C) Any adult for his or her brother or sister; or (D) Any grandparent for his or her grandchild. (E) Grandchild (F) Niece, nephew, aunt, or uncle Treatment which the patient would have wanted had the patient

understood the circumstances under which such treatment or procedures are provided.

Page 10: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Medical Consent in Minors

Under the age of 18 may consent to: Treatment for drug abuse HIV testing Prevention of pregnancy Treatment during pregnancy and childbirth Treatment for STD Abortion with parental notification

Page 11: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Informed Consent

Not just a piece of paperInformed consent is a means of engaging a

patient in important health care decisionsThere is therapeutic value to true informed

consent

Page 12: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Exceptions to Informed Consent

Emergency exceptions to informed consent Consent is implied in emergency when patient is lacks

capacity and surrogate unavailableTherapeutic privilegeWhat is Rule #1?Rule #1 - We are doctors, not lawyers

Page 13: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 14: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Confidentiality

What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep to myself Hippocrates

Page 15: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Confidentiality

Confidentiality is the obligation on the physician not to reveal what has been learned during the course of treatment

Privilege is the right of a patient, established only by statute, whereby a patient may prevent his physician from testifying. Privilege is a legal right belonging only to the patient and not to the physician.

Page 16: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 1996

Title II: Preventing Health Care Fraud and Abuse; Administrative Simplification; Medical Liability Reform Intent to restrict release of information to only that

necessary to achieve the purpose Patients are guaranteed access to their medical records

and may amend Not “psychotherapy” notes

What about disclosing information to a family member in an emergency? Consent not required if disclosure necessary for

treatment Notification of family may be necessary for treatment Rule #1

Page 17: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Subpoena Duces Tecum

Immediate response: Reply, don’t comply

Check with patientGet legal advice if

neededRelease minimum

information necessary

Page 18: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Breaking Confidentiality

Reporting child abuse or neglectAbuse of seniorsAbuse of disabledResidents of long term care facilitiesReporting HIV to stateNotifying sexual partners of HIV (permissive)“Tarasoff” warnings

“protective privilege ends where the public peril begins”

Duty to protect identfiable third parties at imminent risk

No law in Georgia

Page 19: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 20: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

What does it mean to be professional?

As a preclinical student? Prepared On time Respectful

As a clinical student? Appearance Prepared On time Respectful

Nurses Extra duty

Page 21: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Some Characteristics of a “Professional”

Self-regulatingSpecialized education, training, knowledge

CompetenceBehaviors

Dress Timeliness Preparedness Courtesy Hard working

Page 22: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

On Entering a Profession

An oath is taken pledging to uphold the standards of that profession

Page 23: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

The Oath of Geneva AT THE TIME OF BEING ADMITTED AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION: I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE myself to consecrate my life to the service of humanity; I WILL GIVE to my teachers the respect and gratitude which is their due; I WILL PRACTICE my profession with conscience and dignity; THE HEALTH OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration; I WILL RESPECT the secrets which are confided in me, even after a patient has died; I WILL REMAIN by all means in my power, the honor and the noble traditions of the medical profession; MY COLLEAGUES will be my brothers and sisters; I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of religion, nationality, race, party politics or social understanding to intervene between my duty and my patient; I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life from its beginning, even under threat, and I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity; I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely and upon my honor.

Page 24: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Consecrate My Life”

I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE myself to consecrate my life to the service of humanity

Page 25: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Respect and Gratitude”

I WILL GIVE to my teachers the respect and gratitude which is their due

Page 26: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Conscience and Dignity”

I WILL PRACTICE my profession with conscience and dignity

Page 27: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“My First Consideration”

THE HEALTH OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration

Page 28: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Confided in Me”

I WILL RESPECT the secrets which are confided in me, even after a patient has died

Page 29: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Traditions”

I WILL REMAIN by all means in my power, the honor and the noble traditions of the medical profession

Page 30: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Brothers and Sisters”

MY COLLEAGUES will be my brothers and sisters

Page 31: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

No Other Considerations

I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of religion, nationality, race, party politics or social understanding to intervene between my duty and my patient

Page 32: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Respect for Human Life”

I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life from its beginning, even under threat, and I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity

Page 33: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

“Promises”

I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely and upon my honor.

Page 34: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

The Oath of Geneva

Challenges to professionalism – But what about . . .?

Page 35: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Consecrate My Life

I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE myself to consecrate my life to the service of humanity What does it mean to “consecrate?” Are you ready when you come to class/rounds? Do you do just the minimum work required (e.g., number of

patients)? Resident work hours – what to do when you’ve reached the

limit and patient continuity of care or a learning might be compromised?

Will you take responsibility for your continuing education, attending meetings, reading journals, obtaining consultations?

Page 36: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Respect Teachers

I WILL GIVE to my teachers the respect and gratitude which is their due An attending asks you to suture a deep facial wound.

You have little experience with this and express your concern. The attending tells you “Well, this is how you learn” and leaves.

An attending asks you to obtain informed consent regarding a complex procedure with which you are unfamiliar and brushes aside your reservations about your ability to describe the procedure, its risks and benefits, prognosis, and alternatives.

An attending deliberately exposes parents of a newborn to a surgical procedure on their baby to demonstrate the futility of further intervention. They are devastated.

Page 37: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Conscience

I WILL PRACTICE my profession with conscience and dignity A recent graduate opens a primary care clinic

advertising itself as catering to gay and lesbian patients. It is one of very few clinics in this rural area. Residents who are not gay or lesbian are reluctant to visit the clinic.

A fertility specialist is approached by a woman who seeks to have six stored fertilized embryos implanted. She has six children at home.

A woman approaches you for advice about an elective abortion, to which you are opposed for religious reasons. Should you refer her to a colleague who performs abortions?

Page 38: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Health of My Patient

THE HEALTH OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration Your patient comes to you for an exam prior to

traveling to Greece for his wedding. You discover him to have TB and express your concern over his trip.

A woman is brought by her husband to the EC with a history of severe depression, auditory hallucinations, and has been suicidal in the past. She gave birth six weeks ago to a health baby. She tells you “Whatever you do, don’t take my baby or make me come in the hospital. I couldn’t take it.” You are considering involuntary hospitalization (“commitment”).

Page 39: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Brothers and Sisters

MY COLLEAGUES will be my brothers and sisters Another student has been coming to groups late, lives

by himself, and there is concern among other students over his drinking and use of antianxiety (Xanax), pain, and stimulant medications.

During your EC and Internal medicine rotations you become aware of a community physician who seems to have a large number of patients coming to the hospital toxic on pain medications for which the indications are unclear, e.g., “fibromyalgia.”

Page 40: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Secrets

I WILL RESPECT the secrets which are confided in me, even after a patient has died Your patient is going through a painful divorce and, during

his annual physical examination, tells you “Sometimes I think the only way to protect the kids from her is just to get her out of picture entirely, if you know what I mean.”

Page 41: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Respect for Life

I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life from its beginning, even under threat, and I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity Patient Rights groups strongly support the “Death

with Dignity Act” in Oregon and seek to pass a similar law in Georgia. Your local legislator asks for your opinion.

Your hospital is considering a futility of care policy applicable to newborns and adults with severe medical conditions for which medical care is unlikely to provide anything but maintenance of vegetative functions. The policy would permit, after due process, termination of life supports over the objections of family.

Page 42: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Click icon to add pictureThreat to professionalismMangled care

Page 43: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Click icon to add pictureThreat to professionalismMedical Industry

Page 44: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Unprofessional Conduct and Board Action

235 MDs disciplined by board 1990-2003469 MDs controlled for school and year of

graduationDisciplined for:

Unprofessional conduct (74%) Incompetence Other

Papadakis et al. Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School. NEJM 2005;353:2673-82

Page 45: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

740 Board Violations by 235 Physicians

Use of drugs or alcohol 108Unprofessional conduct 82Conviction for a crime 46Negligence 42Prescribing/acquisition substances 39Violation of Board order/condition 32Sexual misconduct 29

Other – Failure to meet CME, fraud, billing, failure to maintain adequate records

Page 46: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Disciplined vs. Control Physicians

No gender differencesHighly significant differences (p< 0.05–

0.001) Medical school academic performance USMLE

Unprofessional conduct in school predicted subsequent disciplinary problems 39% of disciplined physicians displayed unprofessional

behaviors in school vs 19% of undisciplined physicians (disciplined physicians twice as likely to have records of unprofessional conduct during school)

P<0.001

Page 47: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Unprofessional Conduct in School

OR

Irresponsibility (>2) 8 Attendance, follow-up

Lack of self-improvement (>2) 3 Response to criticism

ImmaturityPoor initiative

Motivation, enthusiasmRelationships (students, nurses, faculty,

patients)

Page 48: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Lessons

Professionalism starts nowGood news – the two most significant

predictors are modifiable If you have problems with attendance, preparedness –

change! If you have a problem accepting criticism – learn!

Smiling inward is deadly

Page 49: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

GroupsPrepare as a professional

Read the cases

Analyze using case analysis format

Discuss with colleagues as you like

Page 50: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Optional Review of First Meeting

What is an ethical dilemma?Conflict between or among moral imperativesPrinciples of medical ethicsAutonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence,

justiceProcedure for ethical case analysisRule #1, stakeholders, relevant laws,

potential consultants, possible decisions, proposed resolution

Page 51: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Review

What ethical principle is the basis for informed consent?

AutonomyKaren Ann Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan casesRight to priacy, right to die What legislation resulted from the Nancy

Cruzan case?Patient Self-Determination ActTarasoff is about:Duty to protect third parties at imminent risk

Page 52: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

The principle of autonomy in medical ethics concerns the patient’s

Right to determine what shall be done to her own body

A capacity determination isA judgment about the patient’s ability to

make a particular decision about her medical care

Which three elements comprise valid, informed consent?

Competence, relevant information, voluntary

Page 53: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

 Informed consent from a patient for a surgical procedure, the standard in Georgia for disclosure of risks includes material risks which are

Accepted by reasonably prudent physicians that would cause a reasonably prudent patient in similar circumstances to refuse the procedure

When a decision must be made about the medical care of an adult patient who has had, but who no longer has, decision-making capacity, which standard should be used?

Substituted judgment

Page 54: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Which law led to the requirement that hospitals ask about the presence of Advance Directives?

Patient Self-Determination Act The Oath of Hippocrates includes which of

the following?A warning to keep secret knowledge

learned from professional contacts as well as knowledge learned “in the daily commerce with men”

Page 55: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Steps in Ethical Case Analysis

Page 56: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 57: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 58: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 59: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 60: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 61: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Principles of Medical Ethics

Which of the following is NOT widely considered a principle of medical ethics? Autonomy Beneficence Respect Social justice Non-Malfeasance

Page 62: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

HIPAA

HIPAA is an important piece of federal legislation covering: Privacy of health care information Treatment in emergency rooms The right to privacy in medical decisionmaking

Page 63: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Mandatory Disclosure

In which of the following cases is disclosure of information NOT required: Suspected child abuse New HIV patient Receipt of a subpoena for medical records to be used

at a divorce proceeding Previously undisclosed criminal history

Page 64: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Match case with the concept most closely identified with it

National attention on “right to die” and removal of life sustaining devices

Duty to protect third parties

Removal of feeding tube, Patient Self Determination Act

TarasoffNancy CruzanKaren Ann Quinlan

Page 65: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Autonomy

The principle of autonomy concerns the patient’s  Right to be treated with compassion Right to determine what shall be done with one’s

body Right to basic medical care Right to drive an automobile

Page 66: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Capacity (competence)

A capacity determination is A judgment about the patient’s ability to be a

good patient A judgment about the patient’s ability to make

good decisions in general A judgment about the patient’s ability to make

good medical decisions A judgment about the patient’s ability to make a

particular decision about her medical care

Page 67: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Which is the more acceptable view?

Providing the degree of information necessary for genuine informed consent is understood to require Disclosing what a reasonable physician would

disclose in the circumstances Disclosing information that a reasonable person

in those circumstances would judge relevant Both

Page 68: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Best Interests or Substituted Judgment?

When a decision must be made about the medical care of an adult patient who has had, but who no longer has, decisionmaking capacity, the surrogate decisionmaker should  Use the “best interest” standard to reach a

decision, i.e., what, in the opinion of the surrogate decisionmaker is in the best interests of the patient

Use the “substituted judgment” standard to reach a decision, i.e., what the patient would have decided if competent

Page 69: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Best Interests or Substituted Judgment?

When a decision must be made about the medical care of a patient who never had decisionmaking capacity, the surrogate decisionmaker should Use the “best interest” standard to reach a

decision, i.e., what, in the opinion of the surrogate decisionmaker is in the best interests of the patient

Use the “substituted judgment” standard to reach a decision, i.e., what the patient would have decided if competent

Neither a nor b

Page 70: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Informed Consent

Which of the following is NOT one of the three elements of a valid informed consent? Information Confidentiality Voluntariness Competence Witnessed

Page 71: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Minors and Medical Decisions

To which medical decisions may a minor in Georgia give consent? Drug abuse treatment STD Treatment of the minor’s child Pregnancy Prevention of pregnancy Abortion with parental notification (except emergency

or with court approval)

Page 72: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 73: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013
Page 74: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Click icon to add pictureThreats to professionalism“Alternative health care”Social justice and lack of access

Page 75: Medical Ethics and Professionalism Review of Part 1 February 11 2013

Questions?