Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEWCASTLE
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,Washington, DC 20036Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society.However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or worksproduced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the courseof their duties.
Article
Mechanism Study on the Interfacial Stability of a LithiumGarnet-type Oxide Electrolyte against Cathode Materials
Nian Zhang, Xinghui Long, Zhi Wang, Pengfei Yu, Fudong Han, Jiamin Fu, Guoxi Ren,Yanru Wu, Shun Zheng, Wencheng Huang, Chunsheng Wang, Hong Li, and Xiaosong Liu
ACS Appl. Energy Mater., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01035 • Publication Date (Web): 02 Oct 2018
Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 3, 2018
Just Accepted
“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are postedonline prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American ChemicalSociety provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the disseminationof scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear infull in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fullypeer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by theDigital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore,the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. Aftera manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Website and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changesto the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers andethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors orconsequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
1
Mechanism Study on the Interfacial Stability of a
Lithium Garnet-type Oxide Electrolyte against
Cathode Materials
Nian Zhang,† Xinghui Long,
†, ∆ Zhi Wang,
‡ Pengfei Yu,
† Fudong Han,
§ Jiamin Fu,
†, ∆ GuoXi
Ren,†, ∆
Yanru Wu,†, ∆
Shun Zheng,†, ∆
Wencheng Huang,†, ∆
Chunsheng Wang, § Hong Li,
#,@ and
Xiaosong Liu*,†,⊥,@
† Center for Excellence in Superconducting Electronics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and
Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 200050, China
‡ Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309,
United States
§ Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park,
Maryland 20742, United states
# Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
∆ University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Page 1 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
2
⊥ School of Physical Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai 201210,
China
@ Tianmu Lake Institute of Advanced Energy Storage Technologies, Liyang City, Jiangsu
213300, China
* E-mail: [email protected]
KEYWORDS: Garnet-type oxide electrolyte, Solid electrolyte, Thermal stability, Co-sintering,
Interface reaction
ABSTRACT: All-solid-state lithium ion battery is considered as one of the most promising next-
generation battery technologies. Understanding the interfacial evolution of a solid electrolyte and
a cathode electrode during mixing and sintering is of great importance, which can provide
guidance to avoid forming unwanted compounds and decrease the interfacial resistance. In this
work, chemical compatibilities are investigated between a Ta-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) solid
electrolyte and major commercial metal-oxide cathodes LiCoO2 (LCO) and Li(NiCoMn)1/3O2
(NCM) through ball-milling and co-sintering processes. As revealed by X-ray absorption
spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy, LLZO spontaneously covers the majority of
the large LCO and NCM particles with a thickness of ~100 nm after ball milling. The thickness
of LLZO layer on these cathodes decreases to about 10 nm after co-sintering at 873 K, and an
interfacial layer of approximately 3 nm is observed for NCM/LLZO. LCO shows a higher
thermal stability than NCM. Density functional theory (DFT) based simulations and
electrochemical measurements suggest Ni-La and Ni-Li exchange could happen at the
Page 2 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
3
NCM/LLZO interface and Li can diffuse from the interface into NCM to occupy the Ni vacancy
at high temperature. The Li depletion layer after diffusion at the interface induces the
decomposition of LLZO and the formation of La2Zr2O7 and LaNiO3 interfacial layer.
INTRODUCTION
Rechargeable Li-ion batteries (LIBs) have been successfully used for consumer electronics in the
past three decades, and are also the devices of power source for emerging technologies including
electric vehicles (EV) and grid-scale energy storages.1-4
However, most current commercialized
LIBs utilize flammable liquid electrolytes which are thermodynamically unstable against lithium
metal and cannot work at high voltages.5-6
These defects limit the capacity and cause the severe
safety and durability issues. Therefore, all-solid-state Li-ion batteries (SSBs), which employ
nonflammable solid electrolytes with a better chemical stability,7 are considered as a promising
next-generation rechargeable battery technology.
Among solid electrolytes, inorganic solid oxide electrolytes (SOEs) have very high chemical and
thermal stability in air and never release toxic gases even in the case of breakdown. However, the
low lithium ion conductivity of SOEs and their insufficient contact with electrodes hinder their
applications.8-11
An important breakthrough was achieved in 2007 by the discovery of a garnet-
type oxide electrolyte, Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO), with a high lithium conductivity of ~2×10-4
S cm-
1,12-15
and ~8×10-4
S cm-1
with Nb doping16
at room temperature. SSBs using Nb-doped LLZO
pellets and LiCoO2 (LCO) cathode exhibit a good electrochemical cyclability.16-18
Nevertheless,
the rigidity of the garnet leads point contact between the solid electrolyte and electrode materials,
which limits the active sides and causes high interfacial resistance for SSBs. For anode,
depositing a thin Ge or Au layer on garnet was found greatly decreases the interfacial resistance
Page 3 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
4
because an alloying reaction occurs between the Li metal and Ge or Au.19-20
Goodenough and co-
workers introduced a cross-linked polymer between garnet and Li metal to effectively improve
their contact.21
But on cathode side, few methods have been found to modulate the interface
effectively. Although electrochemical activities can be achieved through preparation of cathode
using the pulsed laser deposition method,16
a diffusion layer during high temperature deposition
increases the interfacial resistance.22
Introducing additives in the cathode, such as a mixture of
the cathode and the solid electrolytes materials23-24
as the cathode electrodes 25-26
is another way
to modulate the interface. An essential high temperature co-sintering during the mixture to
increase interfacial contact which still leads to unavoidable chemical side reactions. Rapid
thermal annealing decreases the high interfacial resistance effectively and maintains the chemical
stability of both materials,27
however, The harsh reaction conditions of this method make it
difficult to be widely applied.
To find effective methods to modulate the cathode/garnet interface, it is prerequisite to clarify
the mechanisms of the interfacial reaction at high temperture.28
The formation and stability of the
LCO/garnet interface during co-sintering is still under debate. Some experimental studies
demonstrated the formation of an interfacial layer containing Co, La, and O with a large
interfacial resistance,29-30
while others did not observe this phenomenon.16
Miara et al. explored
the cathode/electrolyte interphases for lithium garnets using first-principles calculations and
showed that cathode/electrolyte interphases are more sensitive to chemical decomposition at high
sintering temperature than to electrochemical decomposition during cycling.31
Understanding the
mechanism and stability of novel solid electrolytes against mixing and sintering with major
commercial oxide cathodes can provide guidance to avoid forming unwanted compounds, to
decrease the interfacial resistance, and to create an excellent coating layer.
Page 4 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
5
In this work, we investigated the thermal stability and electronic structure of mixture of Ta-
doped Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 (LLZO) and two cathode materials, LiCoO2 (LCO) or
Li(NiCoMn)1/3O2 (NCM), respectively. The mixed samples were treated through a ball-milling
procedure and co-sintered in ambient air at 873 K for 1 h. We found that LLZO spontaneously
covers the surface of the cathode materials after ball-milling, and the thickness of the surface
layer is reduced to the nanoscale after co-sintering. Our work provides comprehensive insight
into the evolution of solid electrolyte/cathode interface and the impact of the surface morphology
through simple ball-milling and co-sintering processes, which can guide element selectivity and
the pre-treatment of the solid electrolyte and electrode.
METHODS
Ta-doping was used to stabilize the cubic phase of garnet. Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 (designated as
LLZO) was prepared using a solid-state reaction. Starting materials of LiOH·H2O (99.995%,
Sigma Aldrich), La(OH)3 (99.9%, Sigma Aldrich), ZrO2 (99.99%, Sigma Aldrich), and Ta2O5
(99.99%, Sigma Aldrich), were weighed and mixed based on the stoichiometric ratio. 10 wt. %
excess of LiOH·H2O (10%) was used to compensate for Li loss during the high-temperature
calcination and sintering. The mixture was ball-milled (PM 100, Retsch) in 2-propanol for 24 h
with zirconia balls in a zirconia vial, and then dried and heated in air at 1223 K for 12 h. The
ball-milling and heating were repeated once to enhance the purity.
We found that LLZO spontaneously covers the surface of the cathode materials after ball
milling, and the thickness of the surface layer was dependent on the rate of ball-milling. To
obtain an electrolyte/electrode composite with a suitable size for our soft X-ray absorption
Page 5 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
6
spectroscopy (sXAS) measurements and magnify the interface reaction, 50wt% LLZO powder
was dry ball-milled with 50wt% commercial LiCoO2 and Li(NiCoMn)1/3O2 (average particle
size:~5µm) at 100 rpm (PM 100, Retsch) for 1h, separately. The composite was then heated at
873 K for 1 h in air. The heating/cooling rate was 5 K/min. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD)
patterns were obtained using a D8 Advance diffractometer with LYNXEYE and Sol-XE
detectors (Bruker AXS, WI, USA) using Cu Kα radiation.
The soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (sXAS) experiments were performed at beam line 20A at
the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) in Taiwan. The bending magnet
beamline provide photons with energy range from 60 to 1250 eV and the average energy
resolving power of 5000. The L-edge of Co, Mn, and Ni and the K-edge of O X-ray absorption
spectra were collected using surface-sensitive total electron yield (TEY) and bulk-sensitive total
fluorescence yield (TFY) modes simultaneously at room temperature in an ultra-high vacuum
chamber with a base pressure of approximately 5×10-10
Torr. The photon energy was calibrated
with the spectra of the reference samples (CoO, MnO, NiO, and SrTiO3), which were measured
simultaneously. The X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) experiments were carried
out at beam line 14W at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images were collected using a JEOL-2010F electron microscope
operated at 200 kV.
Electrochemical tests were performed in R2032 coin-type cells with lithium foil as the negative
electrode. The positive electrode was fabricated by blending the cathode material, polyvinylidene
fluoride (PVDF), and acetylene black (84:7:7) in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). The slurry was
coated onto the aluminum foil current collector and dried under vacuum at 393 K for 12h prior to
use. The coated foil was cut into 15-mm-diameter circular discs. The electrolyte solution was
Page 6 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
7
1.0M LiPF6 in an ethylene carbonate (EC)–dimethyl carbonate (DMC) mixture (1:1 ratio by
volume). All cells were assembled in an Ar-filled dry glove box (O2, H2O below 2 ppm).
Galvanostatic charge and discharge cycle tests were carried out at room temperature between 2.5
and 4.4 V using a Biologic electrochemical workstation. The capacity was reported based on the
mass of LCO and NCM.
The first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculation was performed using the Vienna
Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP). The practical NCM primary particles were enclosed by
many different facets. Our NCM/LLZO interface for DFT calculation was constructed as
NCM(101�0)/LLZO(100), where NCM had a space group of R-3m, and LLZO was in a slightly
distorted cubic structure (�
�= 1.037). We chose this interface for the following reasons: NCM
(101�0) is one of the most stable facets32
and is reported to provide apparent Li-ion conduction
paths,33
thus having been used in many previous works.34-35
Moreover, we have done the
geometry check for NCM/LLZO interfaces and found that NCM(101�0)/LLZO(100) has the
smallest lattice mismatch (~8.3%), which not only indicates a good stability but also reduces
complexity of modeling. The detailed explanations of the interface modeling and computational
parameters have been given in Supporting Information. To describe the possibility of atom
exchange at the interface, for every pair of atoms {��, ��} that may exchange with each other, we
calculated its exchange energy as
������ ↔ ��� = ��������� ↔ ��� − �������
where ������� and ��������� ↔ ��� are the DFT total energies of the pristine system and the
system with atom exchange �� ↔ �� , respectively.
Page 7 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
8
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The XRD pattern of the Ta-doped LLZO powder is shown in Figure 1 and matches well with
standard cubic garnet phase.13, 36
After ball-milling process with LCO and NCM (red lines), the
peaks show only the superimposed signal of two compounds, which indicate that no chemical
reaction occurred during the physical mixing. However, peaks labeled with asterisks (*) which
stand for the pyrochlore phase of La2Zr2O7 (JC-PDF, card No.50-0837) can be observed in both
co-sintered samples (blue lines), indicating that side reactions happen at 873K. To confirm the
instability of LLZO is caused by mixed sintering with cathode materials, we heated LLZO
powder individually in ambient air at 873 K for 1 h (see Figure S2), and it still remained pure
cubic phase. The peak intensities of La2Zr2O7 are much stronger for the co-sintered NCM+LLZO
than co-sintered LCO+LLZO, which indicate that Ni or Mn in NCM may influence the
interfacial stability during co-sintering. A peak at approximately 32° labeled with a diamond (♦)
is only observed in co-sintered NCM+LLZO sample which could be assigned to LaCoO3 (JC-
PDF, card No.48-0123), LaMnO3 (JC-PDF, card No.33-0713), or LaNiO3 (JC-PDF, card No.33-
0711). The positions of characteristic peaks for these three compounds are too close to be
distinguished in the XRD spectra. Thus XAS is used to identify the chemical composition, which
will be discussed in detail below. When the co-sintering temperature increases to 973 K, both
LCO+LLZO and NCM+LLZO samples are substantially decomposed and LaCoO3 is observed in
the LCO+LLZO sample as shown in Figure S3. The results reveal that the Li, La, and transition
metals (TMs; i.e., Ni, Co, and Mn) are active elements for high temperature diffusion and side
reactions at the interface.
Page 8 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
9
Figure 1. Powder XRD patterns show the impact caused by the ball-milling and co-sintering
processes for LCO+LLZO and NCM+LLZO samples; cubic LLZO, LaNiO3 and La2Zr2O7 are
displayed as reference. New peaks which are marked with asterisks (*) appear in both co-
sintered samples; the peaks at approximately 21.7° and 32° marked with a diamond (♦) only
appear in the co-sintered NCM+LLZO sample.
Soft XAS was employed to estimate the composition of the peak at approximately 32° in the
NCM+LLZO 873K sample. Both surface-sensitive TEY (probing depth ~10 nm) and bulk-
sensitive TFY (investigation depth ~100 nm) modes were collected simultaneously and
Page 9 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
10
compared directly to obtain depth-dependent chemical information.37-38
For all 3d transition
metal (TM) elements, XAS directly measures the unoccupied 3d states through dipole-allowed
2p-to-3d transitions.39-40
Comparing our XAS results with those for the reference samples (CoO,
MnO, NiO), we conclude that Co remains in the +3 valence state in pristine LCO and NCM; Ni
remains mainly in the +2 and may contain a small amount of +3 state as the shoulder C in Figure
2 is higher than reference sample NiO; and Mn is in the +4 state in NCM.
The sXAS results shown in Figure S4-S6 indicate Co and Mn is stable in both LCO+LLZO and
NCM+LLZO samples after ball-milling and co-sintering processes, since no dramatic peak
changes are observed. The TFY spectra of Mn L-edge is significantly distorted due to the severe
self-absorption effect. Therefore, we instead measured the Mn K-edge with larger probing depth
to detect the bulk variations. No peak position and line shape changes are found in the Mn K-
edge spectra (see Figure S7), which indicate Mn is stable in the bulk, thus the XRD peak at
approximately 32° in NCM+LLZO 873K sample may only represent LaNiO3.
To confirm the formation of LaNiO3 after co-sintering, Ni L-edge TEY and TFY spectra were
measured at different stages and are shown in Figure 2. The overall spectral line-shape consists
of three main features (A, B, and C in the graph). In the spectra, peak A represents the La M-
edge, while B and C represent the Ni L3 edge. The energy separation between B and C is 1.5 eV
resulting from the multiplet effect splitting. The relative intensities of B and C indicate the
oxidation state of Ni is mainly in +2 state in pristine NCM. The unexpected strong intensity of
the La M-edge peak (A) in the TEY spectra reveals that the LLZO is the main composition
within the detected 10-nm-thick surface layer after ball-milling and co-sintering. The intensity of
peak A becomes much lower in the TFY spectra than in the TEY spectra after ball-milling (red
line), and almost disappears after co-sintering. These results illustrate that LLZO covers the
Page 10 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
11
surface of NCM with a thickness between the probing depth of TEY (10 nm) and TFY (100 nm)
after ball-milling, while the thickness of the surface layer further decreases to about 10nm after
co-sintering. The simplified core-shell model is shown in Figure 2(c), NCM materials are
usually big secondary particles, small LLZO particles after ball-milling cover the majority of
large NCM particles with a non-uniform thickness. The thickness of LLZO layer decreases to
around 10nm and partial NCM may be exposed after co-sintering at 873K. The intensity ratio of
peak B and C does not change after ball-milling, while the intensity of peak C significantly
increases in both the TEY and TFY spectra after co-sintering. This variation reveals that Ni in
both surface and bulk material is partially oxidized from the +2 to +3 state, which supports the
formation of LaNiO3 with Ni 3+ and is consistent with our XRD results. In addition, previous
study showed that Li2CO3 is commonly formed on the surface of LLZO when exposed to
ambient air.41
However, we do not observe the diffraction peak of Li2CO3 in any of our XRD
patterns, indicating that Li2CO3 is probably amorphous at the surface. To confirm whether
Li2CO3 participates in the side reactions at the interface during the co-sintering process, we co-
sintered pure Li2CO3 with NCM at 873 K in ambient air for 1 h. No clear valence change of Ni
(pink line in Figure 2) is found, demonstrating that NCM reacts with LLZO rather than Li2CO3,
which causes the changes in the XRD patterns.
Page 11 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
12
Figure 2. Ni L-edge XAS spectra of NCM+LLZO samples detected in (a) TEY mode and (b)
TFY mode. The spectrum of co-sintered NCM+Li2CO3 is shown to confirm that Li2CO3 is not
the reason for the valence increase of Ni. The inset shows the comparison of the Ni L3 edge. (c)
A brief schematic illustration for the alteration of surface topography during the ball-milling and
co-sintering process.
Figure 3 (a) and (b) shows the normalized O K-edge TEY and TFY spectra of LCO+LLZO and
NCM+LLZO samples, and the pure Li2CO3 is exhibited as a reference sample. The pure Li2CO3
Page 12 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
13
spectrum (bottom) has a main peak (C) at 534.5 eV, which is assigned to electron transition from
the O 1s orbital to the π* (C=O) antibonding orbital.38
The O K-edge TEY spectrum of LLZO is
quite similar with pure Li2CO3 indicates that the surface of LLZO is fully covered with Li2CO3
(>10 nm thick) after exposure to air. The shoulder B at 532.5 eV in the TFY spectrum is
consistent with the oxygen of LLZO,41
thus the thickness of the Li2CO3-covered layer is much
less than the typical detection depth of TFY mode ~100 nm. When LLZO is ball-milled with
LCO, peak A representing the oxygen of LCO is almost invisible in the TEY spectrum (red line)
and is strong in the TFY spectrum. This phenomenon confirms our conclusion that LLZO covers
the surface of the electrode materials after ball-milling with a thickness between 10 and 100nm.
The intensity of peak A in the TEY and TFY spectra both increases significantly after co-
sintering at 873 K (blue line), supporting that the thickness of the surface layer decreases to
about 10 nm after co-sintering. In Figure 3 (c)-(d), NCM shows a very similar behavior as that
for LCO at the O K-edge, revealing that the coating phenomenon through ball-milling and co-
sintering is common for TM oxide electrode materials.
Page 13 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
14
Figure 3. O K-edge XAS spectra of the samples and Li2CO3 is shown as a reference sample. (a)
and (b) Spectra of LCO+LLZO at different stages detected by TEY (surface) and TFY (bulk)
mode. (c) and (d) Spectra of NCM+LLZO at different stages by TEY and TFY mode.
For an intuitionistic observation of the interfacial structure, we performed TEM measurements
for the NCM+LLZO powders after ball-milling and co-sintering, respectively. After the ball-
milling process, a layer of LLZO covers the surface of NCM with a thickness of ~100 nm, as
shown in Figure 4(a). The magnified view in Figure 4(b) confirms that the core material is NCM,
which exhibits a local single (003) facet with a lattice distance of 0.476nm. Since LLZO quickly
reacts with air and forms Li2CO3, it is reasonable to expect that the surface of LLZO may have
an amorphous structure,24
thus no clear lattice fringes of LLZO can be found. After co-sintering
Page 14 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
15
at 873 K for 1 h, the thickness of the surface layer significantly decreases to less than 10 nm, as
shown in Figure 4(c) and (d). We observe clear lattice fringes for NCM and LLZO at the
boundary area, indicating the thickness of the Li2CO3 layer significantly decreases after co-
sintering. The original Li2CO3 around large LLZO particles could be fallen off or decomposed
through the ball-milling and high-temperature treatment, and the regeneration of Li2CO3 may be
depressed when the particle size of LLZO decreases to nanoscale. We find a clear interfacial
layer of approximately 3 nm, which could be created by LaNiO3 and La2Zr2O7. After co-
sintering, the cathode material exhibits a tiny twist of the lattice fringes nearby the interfacial
layer. We speculate that Li which has a similar atomic radius with Ni, diffuses from interface
into the NCM to exchange or occupy the vacancy of Ni. The Li-Ni exchange could be the main
reason for the observed Ni 3+ state in the bulk NCM using TFY mode [Figure 2(b)], as LaNiO3
can only forms at the interface due to the large atomic radius of La.
Page 15 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
16
Figure 4. TEM image of the NCM+LLZO samples. (a) Sample after ball-milling. (b) Magnified
view of the area outlined by the dotted line in panel (a). (c) Sample after co-sintering at 873 K.
(d) Magnified view of the area outlined by the dotted line in panel (c).
To ensure the diffusion of Li from interface into the NCM at a high temperature 873K and
explore its effect on electrode materials, we performed electrochemical tests using mixed
materials at different stages as the cathode, and the results are shown in Figure 5. For the LCO
Page 16 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
17
sample, a clear discharge capacity fading from 153.5 mAh g-1
for the pristine sample (black line)
to 100 mAh g-1
for the ball-milled sample (red line) is observed at 0.2 C. This capacity fading
also appears in the NCM sample, but is milder from 164 to 132 mAh g-1
. The distinction may be
caused by the different thicknesses of the LLZO layers on these two cathode materials after ball
milling. An increase of the discharge capacity is observed in both the LCO+LLZO and
NCM+LLZO samples after co-sintering. The capacity for sintered LCO+LLZO sample only
increases to 134 mAh g-1
since rare interfacial reaction happens at 873K. However, sintered
NCM+LLZO sample unexpectedly reaches a capacity of 180 mAh g-1
, which is even higher than
the pristine sample. EIS results in Figure S8 (c) and (d) shows that the charge transfer resistance
(Rct) through the electrode/electrolyte interface increases after ball-milling and decreases after
co-sintering for both LCO and NCM mixed samples. Sintered NCM+LLZO sample has a larger
resistance than pristine NCM, which supports the extra capacity is contributed by the diffusion of
Li from interface into NCM. The diffusion is probably the reason for the initial capacity increase
observed in LLZO-coated LiMn1.95Ni0.05O3.98F0.02 cathodes via the sol–gel route and
subsequently heat treated at different temperatures.42
However, the LCO+LLZO sample exhibits
a more stable cycling performance at different cycle ratios than NCM+LLZO (see figure S8). It
indicates that the formation of interfacial layer and the cathode degradation caused by the mutual
diffusion is harmful for the electrochemical cycle performance.
Page 17 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
18
Figure 5. The second round galvanostatic charge–discharge curves at 0.2 C for (a) LCO+LLZO
and (b) NCM+LLZO at different stages.
To explore the stability mechanism of NCM/LLZO interface, we have calculated the interface
Ni-La and Ni-Li exchanges using the first-principles density functional theory (DFT). Figure 6.
(a) shows the 3D model of the NCM/LLZO interface and the positions of the 2 Ni, 3 La and 6 Li
atoms involved in the Ni-La and Ni-Li exchanges, while (b) and (c) show the exchange energies
for Ni-La and Ni-Li exchanges, respectively. We have found that the La and Li atoms close to
the Li slab in NCM show lower exchange energies than those distant from the Li slab.
Meanwhile, the exchange energies for Ni-Li are strongly dependent on the Li local environment.
For instance, the 2 Li atoms which have negative exchange energies (Ni1-Li3, Ni2-Li6) are 6-
fold coordinated, making their local environment (LiO6) similar to the Ni local environment in
NCM (NiO6), thus the replacement Ni atoms form the NiO6 octahedrons directly. Other Li
atoms, e.g., Li4 and Li5, only have 4 neighbor oxygens, which lead to higher exchange energies
than Li3 and Li6. We note that because of the atom relaxations, the Li atoms in LLZO interface
may have very different local environment to the ones in the bulk LLZO, i.e., they cannot be
Page 18 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
19
described using the symmetry symbols in bulk LLZO such as 24 d or 96 h. The lowest exchange
energies for Ni-La and Ni-Li are -1.20 eV and -0.85 eV, respectively, which suggest that
although NCM/LLZO interface is much more stable than the LPS/LCO interface,34
moderate
atom exchanges may still exist. We also calculated the Eex for the interface Co/Mn-Li/La atom
exchanges and the results are shown in Table S1. Co-Li exchange may happen at temperature
higher than 873K as the lowest Eex is -0.45eV, which is 0.4eV higher than Ni-Li. The exchange
energies for Mn-Li are much higher than that of Co and Ni, indicating Mn is the most stable
element in NCM. Co-La and Mn-La have high exchange energies over 2.28eV which suggest
these exchanges hardly happening at the interface.
The very thin diffusion layer (~3 nm) shown in our NCM+LLZO 873K TEM results suggest that
the Ni-La exchange can only happen nearby the relaxed interfacial layer, which can be explained
by the large difference of ionic radius between Ni and La. Li in LLZO, on the other hand, has
similar ionic radius to Ni thus it can diffuse into NCM to exchange with Ni or occupy the Ni
defects under external forces, which can be the reason for Ni oxidation in bulk NCM observed
by XAS and the capacity increasing. Meanwhile, the exchange of Ni-Li and Ni-La nearby the
interface can be the driving forces for further formation of Ni defects in bulk NCM and Li
vacancy at the interface when co-sintered at 873K. The Li depletion layer after diffusion at the
interface can induce the decomposition of LLZO and the formation of La2Zr2O7 and LaNiO3, and
this phenomenon is aggravated with the rising temperature. The formation of LaNiO3 and the
cathode degradation caused by the structural change can be the reason for poor cycling stability
in NCM+LLZO 873K sample.
Page 19 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
20
Figure 6. (a) The interface structure of NCM(101�0) /LLZO(100). (b) Exchange energies for 3
Ni-La exchanges. (c) Exchange energies for 6 Ni-Li exchanges.
Figure 7 gives a brief schematic illustration of the process during the ball-milling and co-
sintering treatments. Small LLZO particles spontaneously covers majority of large NCM
particles with a non-uniform thickness 40~100 nm during ball-milling, and no chemical reactions
occur at the interface. The thickness of the surface layer decreases to around 10 nm after co-
sintering at 873 K, and an interfacial layer of approximately 3 nm is observed for NCM/LLZO.
Mn is the most stable element in NCM, while Ni is active which can partially exchange with
both Li and La at the interface at 873K. Ni-La exchanges could only happen nearby the relaxed
interfacial layer, while Li can diffuse from interface into NCM to exchange and fill the vacancy
of Ni. The Ni-Li exchanges increase the valence of Ni in the bulk and lead to a higher capacity of
sintered sample than that of the pristine sample. The Li depletion layer can induce the
decomposition of LLZO that forms La2Zr2O7 and LaNiO3. The structural evolution of the
Page 20 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
21
cathode material and the formation of LaNiO3 at the interface may be harmful for the cycling
stability. Our results suggest that by simple treatments such as ball-milling and co-sintering, one
can easily create a nanoscale surface layer of LLZO on the TM oxide cathode material.
Decreasing the TM vacancy in the cathode material or increasing Ni-Li/Ni-La exchange barriers
may improve the interfacial stability between cathodes and solid LLZO electrolyte at high
temperature.
Figure 7. A brief schematic illustration for the formation process and the structure of the LLZO
surface layer on large NCM particles during the ball milling and co-sintering processes.
Page 21 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
22
CONCLUSION
We have investigated the chemical compatibilities of garnet-type solid electrolyte Ta-doped
LLZO with major commercial cathodes, LCO and NCM, upon ball-milling and co-sintering
processes. The ball-milling process does not introduce chemical reactions between the electrolyte
and cathode materials. Mn is the most stable element in NCM, while Li, La, and Ni are the active
elements that participate in diffusion at the interface during the co-sintering at 873K. When
mixed with the TM oxide electrode through physical methods, nano-scale LLZO particles cover
majority of the large electrode particles with a thickness of 40~100 nm. After co-sintering at a
high temperature, the thickness of the surface layer decreases to about 10 nm. Li in LLZO nearby
the interface could exchange with Ni and diffuse into NCM to occupy the vacancy of Ni,
forming a Li depletion layer. This Li depletion layer could induce the decomposition of LLZO
that forms La2Zr2O7 and LaNiO3 which is harmful for the cycle performance. Therefore,
stabilizing the TM elements, decreasing the vacancy in TM-based cathodes, and increasing Ni-
Li/Ni-La exchange barriers are necessary to improve the interfacial stability between cathodes
and LLZO at high temperature. Further optimization of ball-milling and co-sintering conditions
to create better coating layer may decrease the interfacial resistance and improve the
electrochemical performance of all-solid-state Li-ion batteries.
Page 22 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
23
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information. The following files are available free of charge.
Additional details about first-principle calculation mainly on the construction of LLZO(100)/
NCM(110) interface, XRD patterns, XAS spectra for Co and Mn (PDF).
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
* E-mail: [email protected]
Author Contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval
to the final version of the manuscript.
Funding Sources
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.
21473235, 11227902, and U1632269), and the One Hundred Person Project of the Chinese
Academy of Sciences. We thank Zhenmin Li at NSRRC for help with some absorption
experiments of this work.
ABBREVIATIONS
Page 23 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
24
LCO, LiCoO2; LIB, lithium-ion secondary battery; LLZO, Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12; NCM,
Li(NiCoMn)1/3O2; SOE, solid oxide electrolytes; SSB, all-solid-state lithium-ion battery; TEM,
transmission electron microscopy; TEY, total electron yield; TFY, total fluorescence yield; TM,
transition metal; XAS, X-ray absorption spectroscopy; XRD, X-ray diffraction.
REFERENCES
1. Etacheri, V.; Marom, R.; Elazari, R.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Challenges in the
Development of Advanced Li-Ion Batteries: A Review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243.
2. Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L.; Huang, X. Research on Advanced Materials for Li-Ion
Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4593–4607.
3. Goodenough, J. B.; Park, K. S. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176.
4. Lu, L.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Ouyang, M. A Review on the Key Issues for Lithium-Ion
Battery Management in Electric Vehicles. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 272–288.
5. Zhu, Y.; He, X.; Mo, Y. Origin of Outstanding Stability in the Lithium Solid Electrolyte
Materials: Insights from Thermodynamic Analyses Based on First-Principles Calculations. ACS
Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 23685–23693.
6. Zhu, Y.; He, X.; Mo, Y. First Principles Study on Electrochemical and Chemical Stability
of Solid Electrolyte–Electrode Interfaces in All-Solid-State Li-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A
2016, 4, 3253–3266.
Page 24 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
25
7. Han, F.; Zhu, Y.; He, X.; Mo, Y.; Wang C. Electrochemical Stability of Li10GeP2S12 and
Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolytes. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2016, 6(8), 1501590.
8. Inada, T.; Takada, K.; Kajiyama, A.; Kouguchi, M.; Sasaki, H.; Kondo, S.; Watanabe,
M.; Murayama, M.; Kanno, R. Fabrications and Properties of Composite Solid-State
Electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 2003, 158, 275–280.
9. Kanno, R.; Murayama, M. Lithium Ionic Conductor Thio-Lisicon: The Li2S-GeS2-P2S5
System. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A742.
10. Mizuno, F.; Hayashi, A.; Tadanaga, K.; Tatsumisago, M. Highly Ion-Conductive Crystals
Precipitated from Li2S–P2S5 Glasses. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 918–921.
11. Sakuda, A.; Kitaura, H.; Hayashi, A.; Tadanaga, K.; Tatsumisago, M. Improvement of
High-Rate Performance of All-Solid-State Lithium Secondary Batteries Using LiCoO2 Coated
with Li2O–SiO2 Glasses. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2008, 11, A1.
12. Murugan, R.; Thangadurai, V.; Weppner, W. Fast Lithium Ion Conduction in Garnet-
Type Li7La3Zr2O12. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7778–7781.
13. Geiger, C. A.; Alekseev, E.; Lazic, B.; Fisch, M.; Armbruster, T.; Langner, R.;
Fechtelkord, M.; Kim, N.; Pettke, T.; Weppner, W. Crystal Chemistry and Stability of
"Li7La3Zr2O12" Garnet: A Fast Lithium-Ion Conductor. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 1089–1097.
14. Awaka, J.; Kijima, N.; Hayakawa, H.; Akimoto, J. Synthesis and Structure Analysis of
Tetragonal Li7La3Zr2O12 with the Garnet-Related Type Structure. J. Solid State Chem. 2009,
182, 2046–2052.
Page 25 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
26
15. Ohta, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Asaoka, T. High Lithium Ionic Conductivity in the Garnet-Type
Oxide Li7−X La3(Zr2−X, Nbx)O12 (X=0–2). J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 3342–3345.
16. Ohta, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Seki, J.; Asaoka, T. Electrochemical Performance of an All-
Solid-State Lithium Ion Battery with Garnet-Type Oxide Electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2012,
202, 332–335.
17. Ohta, S.; Komagata, S.; Seki, J.; Saeki, T.; Morishita, S.; Asaoka, T. All-Solid-State
Lithium Ion Battery Using Garnet-Type Oxide and Li3BO3 Solid Electrolytes Fabricated by
Screen-Printing. J. Power Sources 2013, 238, 53–56.
18. Ohta, S.; Seki, J.; Yagi, Y.; Kihira, Y.; Tani, T.; Asaoka, T. Co-Sinterable Lithium
Garnet-Type Oxide Electrolyte with Cathode for All-Solid-State Lithium Ion Battery. J. Power
Sources 2014, 265, 40–44.
19. Luo, W.; Gong, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, K. K.; Pastel, G.; Lin, C. F.;
Mo, Y.; Wachsman, E. D.; Hu, L. Reducing Interfacial Resistance between Garnet-Structured
Solid-State Electrolyte and Li-Metal Anode by a Germanium Layer. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29.
1606042.
20. Tsai, C. L.; Roddatis, V.; Chandran, C. V.; Ma, Q.; Uhlenbruck, S.; Bram, M.; Heitjans,
P.; Guillon, O. Li7La3Zr2O12 Interface Modification for Li Dendrite Prevention. ACS Appl.
Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10617–10626.
21. Zhou, W.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Xin, S.; Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. Plating a
Dendrite-Free Lithium Anode with a Polymer/Ceramic/Polymer Sandwich Electrolyte. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9385–9388.
Page 26 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
27
22. Kato, T.; Iwasaki, S.; Ishii, Y.; Motoyama, M.; West, W. C.; Yamamoto, Y.; Iriyama, Y.
Preparation of Thick-Film Electrode-Solid Electrolyte Composites on Li7La3Zr2O12 and Their
Electrochemical Properties. J. Power Sources 2016, 303, 65–72.
23. Deng, Y.-F.; Zhao, S.-X.; Hu, D.-H.; Nan, C.-W. Structure and Electrochemical
Performance of Spinel LiMn1.95Ni0.05O3.98F0.02 Coated with Li-La-Zr-O Solid Electrolyte. J. Solid
State Electrochem. 2013, 18, 249–255.
24. Park, K.; Yu, B.-C.; Jung, J.-W.; Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Gao, H.; Son, S.; Goodenough, J. B.
On the Electrochemical Nature of the Cathode Interface for a Solid-State Lithium-Ion Battery:
Interface between LiCoO2 and Garnet-Li7La3Zr2O12. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28 (21), 8051–8059
25. Boulineau, S.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Leriche, J.-B.; Viallet, V. Electrochemical Properties of
All-Solid-State Lithium Secondary Batteries Using Li-Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl as Solid Electrolyte.
Solid State Ionics 2013, 242, 45–48.
26. Auvergniot, J.; Cassel, A.; Ledeuil, J.-B.; Viallet, V.; Seznec, V.; Dedryvère, R. Interface
Stability of Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl toward LiCoO2, LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2, and LiMn2O4 in Bulk All-
Solid-State Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 3883–3890.
27. Liu, B.; Fu, K.; Gong, Y.; Yang, C.; Yao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Kuang, Y.; Pastel, G.;
Xie, H.; Wachsman, E. D.; Hu, L. Rapid Thermal Annealing of Cathode-Garnet Interface toward
High-Temperature Solid State Batteries. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 4917–4923.
28. Luntz, A. C.; Voss, J.; Reuter, K. Interfacial Challenges in Solid-State Li Ion Batteries. J.
Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4599–4604.
Page 27 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
28
29. Kotobuki, M.; Munakata, H.; Kanamura, K.; Sato, Y.; Yoshida, T. Compatibility of
Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte to All-Solid-State Battery Using Li Metal Anode. J. Electrochem.
Soc. 2010, 157, A1076–A1079.
30. Kim, K. H.; Iriyama, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Kumazaki, S.; Asaka, T.; Tanabe, K.; Fisher, C.
A. J.; Hirayama, T.; Murugan, R.; Ogumi, Z. Characterization of the Interface between LiCoO2
and Li7La3Zr2O12 in an All-Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Battery. J. Power Sources 2011,
196, 764–767.
31. Miara, L. J.; Richards, W. D.; Wang, Y. E.; Ceder, G. First-Principles Studies on Cation
Dopants and Electrolyte|Cathode Interphases for Lithium Garnets. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27,
4040–4047.
32. D. Kramer, G. Ceder Tailoring the morphology of LiCoO2: a first principles study. Chem.
Mater. 2009, 21, 3799–3809.
33. A. Van der Ven, G. Ceder, M. Asta, and P. D. Tepesch First-principles theory of ionic
diffusion with nondilute carriers. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 184307.
34. Haruyama, J.; Sodeyama, K.; Tateyama, Y. Cation Mixing Properties toward Co Diffusion
at the LiCoO2 Cathode/Sulfide Electrolyte Interface in a Solid-State Battery. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 2017, 9, 286−292.
35. Haruyama, J.; Sodeyama, K.; Han, L.; Takada, K.; Tateyama, Y. Space−Charge Layer
Effect at Interface between Oxide Cathode and Sulfide Electrolyte in All-Solid State Lithium-Ion
Battery. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4248−4255.
Page 28 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
29
36. Sharafi, A.; Meyer, H. M.; Nanda, J.; Wolfenstine, J.; Sakamoto, J. Characterizing the
Li–Li7LaZr2O12 Interface Stability and Kinetics as a Function of Temperature and Current
Density. J. Power Sources 2016, 302, 135–139.
37. Qiao, R.; Chuang, Y. D.; Yan, S.; Yang, W. Soft X-Ray Irradiation Effects of Li2O2,
Li2Co3 and Li2O Revealed by Absorption Spectroscopy. PLoS One 2012, 7, e49182.
38. Qiao, R.; Lucas, I. T.; Karim, A.; Syzdek, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, W.; Persson, K.; Kostecki,
R.; Yang, W. Distinct Solid-Electrolyte-Interphases on Sn (100) and (001) Electrodes Studied by
Soft X-Ray Spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 1, 3
39. De Groot, F.; Kotani, A. Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids; CRC Press: City, 2008.
40. Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Liu, G.; Srinivasan, V.; Liu, Z.; Hussain, Z.; Yang, W. Distinct
Charge Dynamics in Battery Electrodes Revealed by In Situ and Operando Soft X-Ray
Spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2568.
41. Cheng, L.; Crumlin, E. J.; Chen, W.; Qiao, R.; Hou, H.; Franz Lux, S.; Zorba, V.; Russo,
R.; Kostecki, R.; Liu, Z.; Persson, K.; Yang, W.; Cabana, J.; Richardson, T.; Chen, G.; Doeff, M.
The Origin of High Electrolyte-Electrode Interfacial Resistances in Lithium Cells Containing
Garnet Type Solid Electrolytes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 18294–18300.
42. Deng, Y.-F.; Zhao, S.-X.; Xu, Y.-H.; Nan, C.-W. Effect of the Morphology of Li–La–Zr–
O Solid Electrolyte Coating on the Electrochemical Performance of Spinel
LiMn1.95Ni0.05O3.98F0.02 Cathode Materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18889–18897.
Page 29 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
30
Table of Contents/Abstract Graphic
Page 30 of 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Energy Materials
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960