Mech vs Lap Splicing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Mech vs Lap Splicing

    1/4

    Mechanical vs. Lap Splin Reinforced Concrete Constructi

    For almost 100 years, construction practices in the building

    of concrete structures have focused on the use of steel

    reinforcement to transfer tension and shear forces. Lap

    splicing has become the traditional method of connecting

    the steel reinforcing bars, largely due to a misconception

    that lap splicing is no-cost splicing.

    Lap splicing requires the overlapping of two parallel bars.

    The overlap load transfer mechanism takes advantage of

    the bond between the steel and the concrete to transfer

    the load. The load in one bar is transferred to the

    concrete, and then from the concrete to the ongoing

    bar. The bond is largely influenced by deformations

    (ribs) on the surface of the reinforcing bar.

    Continuing research, more demanding designs in concrete

    construction, new materials, hybrid concrete/structural

    steel designs and other changes in the construction

    industry are calling for the use of alternatives to lap

    splicing. From the standpoint of function, laps perform

    well on bar sizes #6 and #8 of 40KSI yield steel and

    3,000 lb. concrete, with a structure of 15 stories considered

    a high-rise. Today, buildings taller than 15 stories are

    increasingly common. A high-rise of reinforced concrete

    in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia recently topped over 100

    stories, and at least a half dozen other 85-plus story

    buildings are under construction or planned.

    building occupied by a Feder

    the largest renter of office sp

    LAP SPLICING PROBLEMS

    Over the years, many structu

    specifiers have noted that lap

    and many disadvantages. ACI

    splices are not considered rel

    cyclic loading into the elastic

    question as to the effectivene

    #8, #9, #10 and #11. These ar

    in the frame of a reinforced c

    question regarding their effic

    Over the years, to counter th

    lap lengths in the ACI 318 Bu

    longer and longer. ACI 12.14.

    of lap splices in bar sizes #14

    prohibited on bar sizes in ten

    12.15.5) and within joints and

    yielding (ACI 21.3.2.3).

    Fig. 1

    Distribution of transverse forces in co

    lap le

    Study Conducted by:ERICO Concrete Reinforcement Products

  • 8/11/2019 Mech vs Lap Splicing

    2/4

  • 8/11/2019 Mech vs Lap Splicing

    3/4

  • 8/11/2019 Mech vs Lap Splicing

    4/4