27
Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois [email protected] www.pmhmusic.weebly.com Wednesday, July 11, 2018 ISU Band Director Workshop

Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom

Dr. Phillip M. Hash

Illinois State University

Normal, Illinois

[email protected]

www.pmhmusic.weebly.com

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

ISU Band Director Workshop

Page 2: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Purpose

• Assessing student growth in school band and orchestra programs• Basic principles

• Definitions

• Performance Assessments

• Traditional Pencil/Paper Assessments

• Insuring Integrity of the Process

• Current Practices in Michigan

Page 3: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

IL School Code on Evaluation (part 50)• Growth = at least 30% of eval score (after 2 yrs. implementation)

• Two or more assessments to determine student growth aligned to school improvement goals.

• Types of Assessments: (I) – standardized; (II) – district wide; (III) – teacher/school specific

• Includes: teacher-created, textbook publishers, work samples/portfolios, measures of student performance

• Specify growth expectations and how growth is calculated (data analysis)

• Must include at least one type I or II, and at least one type III unless• A district joint committee on evaluation can allow two type III for a particular classification of

teachers (e.g., music, PE, etc.)

• Interval of Instruction could be one year to the next

• Evaluation rating related to number of students meeting growth expectation

Page 4: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Basic Principles• Assessment = Art of the Possible

• Growth vs. Achievement

• Should NOT Dominate• What do you already do?

• Meaningful & Useful vs. “Hoops”

• Individual Student Progress

• Skills & Concepts vs. “the piece”

• Not necessarily for a Grade

• Administrators want music educators to lead their process

Page 5: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Assessment Terms• Reliability = Consistency

• Test/retest

• Interrater

• Validity = the extent to which an assessment measures what it intends• [Connect w/ IL Music Standards]

• Authentic Assessment = Demonstrate knowledge and skills in real-world context (e.g., performance)

• Psychometric = Pencil & paper test

Page 6: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Performance Assessment

Page 7: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Rubrics [examples in handout]• Assessment Tool Containing:

• Categories or Dimensions of Performance

• Multiple Levels of Achievement

• Descriptors for each level of each category

• Advantages• Improves reliability

• Informs student & teacher

• Focuses attention on whole performance

• Combine dim. scores into summative total

• OK to measure only a few categories

Analytic RubricBeginning Wind Instrument Performance Rubric

CATEGORY Well Developed (4) Developing (3) Emerging (2) Undeveloped (1)

Note

Accuracy

All notes are correct

A few note errors Several note errors Many note errors

Articulation

Student begins all

notes w/ “too” (vs.

air attacks) and

blows with

continuous air

Student usually

begins notes w/

“too” (vs. air

attacks) and/or

usually blows with

continuous air

Student sometimes

begins notes w/

“too” (vs. air

attacks) and/or

sometimes blows

with continuous air

Student rarely/never

begins notes with

“too” and

rarely/never blows

with continuous air

Rhythm The beat is always

steady, and all notes

values are correct

The beat is usually

steady, and/or a few

note values are

incorrect

The beat is

sometimes steady,

and/or several note

values are incorrect

The beat is

rarely/never steady,

and/or many note

values are incorrect

Total ____/12

Page 8: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Additive Rubric

• (Point awarded for each aspect of a dimension that is demonstrated)

Page 9: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Holistic Rubric (overall performance)

• OK to underline statements that apply and score using a decimal.

Wind Instrument Rubric Based on: Pennsbury School District

Fallsington, Pennsylvania

Instructor may use decimals (e.g., 4.5) to indicate aspects of multiple

descriptors.

5 – Student plays with clear and supported tone, steady

beat, correct pitches, rhythm, articulation, and perhaps

an isolated error.

4 – Student plays with mostly clear and supported tone,

steady beat, correct pitches, rhythm, and articulation,

but perhaps a few errors.

3 – Student plays with sometimes clear and supported

tone, inconsistent beat, and several mistakes in pitches,

rhythm, or articulation.

2 – Student plays with developing tone, unsteady beat,

and many mistakes in pitches, rhythm, and/or fingering

a particular note, and/or articulation.

1 – Student plays with underdeveloped tone, many

stops and starts, mostly incorrect pitches and rhythm,

seems very unsure of fingerings, and/or does not

articulate.

Page 10: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Creating a Rubric

• Determine Categories – between 3-5

• Write descriptors for different levels of proficiency (1-4 or 5) [Analytic]

• Short paragraph (2-4 sentences)

• Top (far left) describes the very best

• Bottom (far right) describes unacceptable

• 2-3 levels in between

• Constructive labels (excellent/needs work, Pro to novice, etc.) [see handout]

• Be prepared to pilot test & revise!!

• http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php

Page 11: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Rubistarhttp://rubistar.4teachers.org/

•Create rubrics using existing templates & descriptors

• Search other teachers’ rubrics for samples• Edit to fit your needs

• Free

Page 12: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Using the Rubric

• Distribute ahead of time• Self/Peer evaluation

• Be clear as to how the rubric will be used• Formative/Pretest/Ungraded

• Summative/Posttest/Graded

• Mastery Learning – Do it until it is of a high level

Page 13: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

SmartMusic©

• Interactive practice and assessment tool

• Extensive Library

• Create, send, and grade assignments

• Students record performance and submit the grade (%), assessment screenshot, and recording.

• Correct notes and rhythms in green/ incorrect in red

• Accuracy of notes and rhythms only

• Most objective

• Educator = $40; Per Student = $4-$12

Page 14: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

www.vocaroo.com

• Record or Upload (e.g. from smart phone)

• Very easy!

• Archived up to 5 months

• Sends link to an email address

• Download as .WAV or Mp3

• Useful for performance tests

• Rec function better for strings & WWs

Page 15: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Resources

Wendy Barden (Kjos) Paul Kimpton (GIA)

Page 16: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

RCMDP Syllabi Components (10-11 levels)https://www.rcmusic.com/

• Progressive Curriculum for all instruments

• Repertoire (a & b lists)

• Technical Req. (scales, arpeggios)

• Ear Training• Intervals

• Clapback

• playback

• Sight reading

• Theory & History Tests are available

• Adapt as needed

Page 17: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Contest Ratings [Group Measure]

Page 18: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Contest Ratings: Advantages/Disadvantages

Advantages

• Third party assessment -Credibility

• Focuses on a major aspect of ensemble curr.

• Final ratings are likely reliable over time

• ISBE Type I Assessment(?)

Disadvantages

• Narrow: 3 pieces & sight reading at one point in time

• Ceiling effect

• Subject to outside influences

• Role of Contest?

Page 19: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Ratings Growth Example

Hypothetical Contest Ratings for One Ensemble over a Three-year Period

Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3Sight-

ReadingAverage

Annual

Increasea Final

Year 1 II III II II 2.25 - 2

Year 2 II II I II 1.75 22% 2

Year 3 I II I I 1.25 29% 1

Note: aTotal increase from year 1 to year 3 = 44%.

Page 20: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Solo/Ensemble Contest Ratings [Type I Assessment]

• Consider requiring S/E participation• Perhaps only two consecutive

grade levels (e.g., 6-7; 9-10)

• Need time to work w/ students

• Other considerations (e.g., $)

• Solos, duets, trios

• Use ABC grading chart (handout) or FJH (online) to standardize grade levels. OK to use ½ grades.

• Growth expectation• > grade/same rating

• Same grade/> rating

• > grade/one rating lower

• Wholistic, authentic assessment

Page 21: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Psychometric Tests[Refer to HS Orchestra Example & “Strategic Testing” article in Handout]

Page 22: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Uses•Theory

•History

•Listen

•Analyze

•Describe

•Evaluate

Page 23: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Psychometric TestsEimer (2007) [See sample HS orch. exam in handout]

• Goal = Test Clarity & Reduced Anxiety

• Give study guide

• Same basic format and scoring for every test

• Reasonable length

• No clues w/in the test

• Test important information/concepts

• Avoid T/F• Unreliable

• Matching• Only facts

• No more than 10 per set

• Same type/topic for each set

• Let student know how many times to use an answer

Page 24: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Multiple Choice

• Incomplete sentence (stem) w/ clear answer & 2-3 distractors

• Match grammar b/w stem & choices

• Choices alpha/numerical

• Stem longer than choices

• Avoid all/none of the above, a & c, etc.

11. ______ “Spring” from Vivaldi’s Four Seasons is

a. an early example of program music.

b. based on sonnets by a famous poet.

c. scored for strings, winds, and percussion.

12. ______ A classical symphony generally has movements arranged

a. fast-minuet-slow-fast.

b. fast-slow-minuet-fast.

c. fast-slow-slow-fast.

13. ______ Orchestral music of the classical era typically features

a. clear, symmetrical phrases.

b. polyphonic texture.

c. the brass section.

Page 25: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Psychometric Tests

• Essay & Short Answer• NOT for factual info

• Make connections, use higher order thinking skills, evaluate understanding

• Make expectation clear in question

• Grade w/ wholistic rubric

• [See HS Orchestra Example]• Notate & Respond

Page 26: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Insuring Integrity

• Demonstrate validity & reliability

• Demonstrate connection b/w state standards and assessments

• Explain/demonstrate process for creating, administering, & grading

• Archive recordings & other student work

Page 27: Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Classroom · Measuring Student Growth in the Instrumental Music Classroom Dr. Phillip M. Hash Illinois State University Normal, Illinois

Conclusion

•Work together

• Share good ideas• [email protected]