16
Key Points Measuring service quality 2019 Center for eGovernment Studies

Measuring service quality 2019 Key Points...Measuring service quality 2019 Center for eGovernment Studies 2 Background Background 3 Citizen First (Canada) Satisfaction Quality 4 Goals

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Key Points

Measuring service quality 2019

Center for eGovernment Studies

2

Background

Background

3

Citizen First (Canada)

Satisfaction

Quality

4

Goals

Kantar Public, Mens Centraal & Ministry of the Interior & Kingdom Relations (Directorate Digital Government)

Development and validation of new 'quality model' to guide implementation of NL DIGIbeter

Ministry of the Interior & Kingdom Relations

Design

5

Three parts

• Literature review Scientific, applied, policy Conceptual research model

• Focusgroups 5 sessions with citizens (4) & companies (1) Adjusted model

• Questionnaire 3702 citizens (3120) & companies (582)Model test (and more)

Conceptual model

6

Factors underlying dimensions

Supportive

Solution orientation

ResponsibilitySecurity

Transparency

Data control

Trust

Privacy

Comprehension

Accessibility

Simplicity

User friendly

Findability

Personal

Freedom of choice

Pro-Active

Speed

Ease of usePleasantness

Uniformity

Conceptual model

7

Factors underlying dimensions

Supportive

Solution orientation

ResponsibilitySecurity

Transparency

Data control

Trust

Privacy

Comprehension

Accessibility

Simplicity

User friendly

Findability

Personal

Freedom of choice

Pro-Active

Speac

Ease of usePleasantness

Uniformity

Removed

Final model

8

Dimensions

Supportive

Solution orientation

ResponsibilitySecurity

Transparency

Data control

Trust

Privacy

Comprehension

Accessibility

Simplicity

User friendly

Findability

Personal

Freedom of choice

Pro-Active

Speed

Ease of Use

Security and trust Help & Support Accessibility Service Design

Final model

9

After adjustments

Satisfaction

Perceived Quality

Safety &Security

Help &Support

Accessibility

Service Design

Dimensions

Evaluation

Personal Characteristics

Demography

Media-use

Role(citizen/company)

10

Evaluation

26.0%

13.1%60.9%

22.5%

14.5%63.1%

Perceived Quality Satisfaction

Negative Neutral Positive

Evaluation

11

TotallyDisagree

Neutral Totally Agree

0.65

0.67

0.52

0.81

0.85

0.61

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Total

Citizens

Business

Quality

Satisfaction

• Dual measurement for characteristics:

• Helps to test model and determining importance of variables.

• Helps to shape policy agenda

12

veryimportant

notimportant

positiveevaluation

negative evaluation

Goodareas:

Monitor

Potentialoverkill:

Temperance

Lowpriority:

No investment

Focal areas:Invest

CharacteristicsImportance and evaluation

Characteristics

13importanceevalua

tion

Characteristics

14importanceevalua

tion

help & support

service design

security & trust

accessibility

15

ModelGradient Boosted Tree

Quality SatisfactionAccuracy 62,52% 64.34%Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) 0.994667 0.977235

Perc. qualitySatisfaction

Dim1. Security & trustDim4. Service design

Dim2. Help & supportDim3 Accessibility

AgeMedia useEducation

GenderQuality

Satisfaction 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

[report title]

Oordeel Burgers en Bedrijven over Overheidsdienstverlening 2019

Center for eGovernment Studies

Dr. Willem Pieterson | [email protected] / pieterson.com

Contact DDG: Dymphna van Beek | [email protected]