Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MEASURING SATISFACTION WITH MYIIUM
STUDENT PORTAL
BY
MUNA AZUDDIN
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of Master of Information
Technology
Kulliyyah of Information and Communication
Technology
International Islamic University
Malaysia
JULY 2011
ii
ABSTRACT
The research investigated the end-user satisfaction with student portal. The study
adopted the End-User Computing Satisfaction, User Satisfaction with B2E Portal,
Task-Technology Fit, Service Quality and WebQual as the theoretical basis. Target
respondents were undergraduate students from three Kulliyyahs i.e. Kulliyyah of
Information and Communication Technology (KICT), Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed
Knowledge and Human Sciences (KIRKHS) and Kulliyyah of Economics and
Management Sciences (KENMS) at the International Islamic University Malaysia
(IIUM) Gombak, Kuala Lumpur. A total of 580 questionnaires were distributed and a
total number of 479 questionnaires were used for analysis. This study found that
students were satisfied with the portal in terms of end-user computing and
convenience of access, trust, security and privacy, consistent image and entertainment,
relative advantage, task-portal fit and, entry guidance and Website structure. However,
students were not satisfied with service quality, innovativeness, aesthetic design and
visual appeal of the portal. This study also found that there was a significant
difference in satisfaction for male and female i.e. female students are more satisfied
with the IIUM Student Portal than the male students. There is no significant difference
in satisfaction for ethnicity, students’ academic programme and interaction effect
between gender and students’ academic programmes. The research implications and
limitations are also discussed in the dissertation.
iii
2
KICT
KIRKHSKENMS
IIUM
iv
APPROVAL PAGE
I certify that I have supervised and read this study and that in my opinion, it confirms
to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and
quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Master of Information Technology.
............................................
Norshidah Mohamed
Supervisor
I certify that I have read this study and that in my opinion it confirms to acceptable
standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a
dissertation for the degree of Master of Master of Information Technology.
...............................................
Asadullah Shah
Examiner
This dissertation was submitted to the Department of Information Systems and is
accepted as a fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Information
Technology.
................................................
Abu Osman Md Tap
Head, Department of Information
Systems
This dissertation was submitted to the Kulliyyah of Information and Communication
Technology and is accepted as a fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master
of Information Technology.
..............................................
Mohd Adam Suhaimi
Dean, Kulliyyah of Information
and Communication Technology
v
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own investigations, except
where otherwise stated. I also declare that it has not been previously or concurrently
submitted as a whole for any other degrees at IIUM or other institutions.
Muna Azuddin
Signature …………………………………… Date ……………………..
vi
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
DECLARATION OF COPYRIGHT AND AFFIRMATION
OF FAIR USE OF UNPUBLISHED RESEARCH
Copyright © 2011 by Muna binti Azuddin. All rights reserved.
MEASURING SATISFACTION WITH MYIIUM STUDENT PORTAL
No part of this unpublished research may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright holder except
as provided below.
1. Any material contained in or derived from this unpublished research may only
be used by others in their writing with due acknowledgement.
2. IIUM or its library will have the right to make and transmit copies (print or
electronic) for institutional and academic purposes.
3. The IIUM library will have the right to make, store in a retrieval system and
supply copies of this unpublished research if requested by other universities
and research libraries.
Affirmed by Muna binti Azuddin.
……………………………. ………………..
Signature Date
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious and the Most Merciful, Peace be upon the
Holy Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) who has given light to mankind and His family.
My praise be to Allah (S.A.W) for providing His blessing, guidance and inner strength
which has helped me got through this challenging journey until successful completion
of this dissertation. I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation to
all those who have supported and assisted me along the way in completing this
dissertation. I could not have done this without their guidance and advice. Firstly, I
would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Associate
Professor Dr. Norshidah Mohamed for her guidance, patience, motivation,
enthusiasm, immense knowledge and continuous advice throughout this journey.
Secondly, I would like to extend my appreciation to all undergraduate students in
International Islamic University of Malaysia who have participated in answering the
survey questions for their valuable time and kind assistance. Most important of all, my
deepest appreciation goes to my beloved parents Azuddin Abdul Rahman and Zawiah
Jaafar, dearest husband Maruan Ibrahim, siblings and friends for their untiring do’a,
understanding and support throughout my study.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract ..........................................................................................................................ii
Abstract in Arabic .........................................................................................................iii
Approval Page ..............................................................................................................iv
Declaration Page ............................................................................................................v
Copyright Page .............................................................................................................vi
Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................vii
List of Tables ................................................................................................................xi
List of Figures ............................................................................................................xiii
List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................xiv
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................1
1.1 Overview ......................................................................................................1
1.2 Organisation of the Dissertation...................................................................2
1.3 The Research Background ...........................................................................3
1.4 The Context of study and Problem Statement .............................................4
1.5 Research Questions .................................................................................6
1.6 Research Objectives .....................................................................................7
1.7 Definition of Common Terms ......................................................................7
1.7.1 Portal .............................................................................................7
1.7.2 Satisfaction ..................................................................................8
1.8 Significance of the Study .............................................................................9
1.8.1 Contributions to Theoretical Framework ......................................9
1.8.2 Contributions to Practice ............................................................10
1.9 Chapter Summary ......................................................................................10
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................11
2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................11
2.2 Information System Success ......................................................................11
2.3 Financial Approach in Information System Success .................................12
2.3.1 Return on Investment (ROI)........................................................12
2.3.2 Net Present Value (NPV) ...........................................................13
2.3.3 Payback Period ...........................................................................15
2.4 User Satisfaction as a Surrogate Measure ..................................................15
2.5 User Satisfaction in Malaysia ....................................................................26
2.6 Chapter Summary ......................................................................................28
ix
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ....................................................29
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................29
3.2 Related Theories ........................................................................................29
3.2.1 End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) Model .....................30
3.2.2 Website User Satisfaction (WUS) Model ...................................31
3.2.3 Website User Satisfaction Model ...............................................34
3.2.4 User Satisfaction with B2E Portal Model ...................................36
3.2.5 Web-based Customer Support System Satisfaction Model.........37
3.2.6 Website Usability, Trust, Satisfaction and Loyalty ....................39
3.2.7 Task-Technology Fit Model .......................................................40
3.2.8 Demographic Factors ..................................................................41
3.3 Research Variables and Theoretical Model ...............................................42
3.3.1 End-User Computing Satisfaction ..............................................44
3.3.2 Task-Portal Satisfaction ..............................................................45
3.3.3 Trust, Security and Privacy Satisfaction .....................................46
3.3.4 Design Quality Satisfaction ........................................................47
3.3.5 Service Quality Satisfaction ........................................................48
3.3.6 Individual Factors .......................................................................49
3.4 Measurement and Instrument .....................................................................52
3.4.1 Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction ...................52
3.4.2 Measurement of Task-Portal Fit Satisfaction .............................53
3.4.3 Measurement of Trust, Security and Privacy ..............................54
3.4.4 Measurement of Design Quality Satisfaction .............................55
3.4.5 Measurement of Service Quality Satisfaction ............................56
3.5 Population and Sample ..............................................................................57
3.6 Data Collection Strategy ............................................................................58
3.7 Pilot Study of the Survey Instrument..........................................................59
3.8 Data Analysis Strategy................................................................................64
3.9 Chapter Summary ......................................................................................67
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS .........................................................................................68
4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................68
4.2 Response Rate ............................................................................................68
4.3 Respondent Profile .....................................................................................69
4.4 Factor Analysis ..........................................................................................70
4.4.1 Pearson Correlation ....................................................................78
4.5 Reliability Analysis ...................................................................................81
4.6 Analysis of Users’ Satisfaction with IIUM Student Portal ........................82
4.7 Analysis of Group Difference ..................................................................108
4.7.1 Gender and Students’ Satisfaction with the IIUM Student
Portal .........................................................................................108
4.7.2 Ethnicity and Students’ Satisfaction with the IIUM Student
Portal ........................................................................................109
4.7.3 Academic Programme and Students’ Satisfaction with the
IIUM Student Portal .................................................................110
4.7.4 Academic Programme and Gender in Students’ Satisfaction
with The IIUM Student Portal ..................................................112
x
4.8 Chapter Summary ....................................................................................115
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION ...............................................................................116
5.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................116
5.2 Summary of Findings ..............................................................................116
5.2.1 Students’ Satisfaction with the IIUM Student Portal ................116
5.2.2 Students’ Characteristics and Students’ Satisfaction with
the IIUM Student Portal ...........................................................117
5.3 Implications .............................................................................................118
5.3.1 Theoretical Implications ...........................................................118
5.3.2 Practical Implications ...............................................................118
5.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research ...................................119
BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................................120
Appendix I: Survey Booklet.......................................................................................128
Appendix II: Letter ....................................................................................................133
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Page No.
3.1 Service Quality Dimensions Definition 38
3.2 Research Variables for Student’s Satisfaction 43
3.3 Computing Satisfaction Item Measures 53
3.4 Task-Portal Fit Satisfaction Item Measures 54
3.5 Trust, Security and Privacy Satisfaction Item Measures 55
3.6 Design Quality Satisfaction Item Measures 56
3.7 Service Quality Satisfaction Item Measures 57
3.8 Targeted Samples 58
3.9 Profile of Respondents 60
3.10 Cronbach’s Alpha for Pilot Test Instrument Round 1 62
3.11 Cronbach’s Alpha for Pilot Test Instrument Round 2 64
4.1 Overview of Response Rates 69
4.2 Profile of Respondents 70
4.3 Factor Analysis Results 72
4.4 Analysis of Items Before and After Factor Analysis 78
4.5 Pearson Correlation Relationship Strength 79
4.6 Correlation Relationship Analysis 80
4.7 Reliability Test after Factor Analysis 81
4.8 End-User Computing and Convenience of Access
Frequency Analysis
84
4.9 End-User Computing and Convenience of Access
Satisfaction Mean and Standard Deviation
85
4.10 Trust, Security and Privacy Frequency Analysis 87
4.11 Trust, Security and Privacy Mean and Standard Deviation 88
4.12 Innovativeness, Aesthetic Design and Visual Appeal
Frequency Analysis 90
xii
4.13 Innovativeness, Aesthetic Design and Visual Appeal Mean
and Standard Deviation 91
4.14 Consistent Image and Entertainment Frequency Analysis 93
4.15 Consistent Image and Entertainment Mean and Standard
Deviation
93
4.16 Service Quality Frequency Analysis 95
4.17 Service Quality Mean and Standard Deviation 95
4.18 Relative Advantage Frequency Analysis 97
4.19 Relative Advantage Mean and Standard Deviation 97
4.20 Task-Portal Fit 1 Frequency Analysis 99
4.21 Task-Portal Fit 1 Mean and Standard Deviation 99
4.22 Entry Guidance and Website Structure Frequency Analysis 101
4.23 Entry Guidance and Website Structure Mean and Standard
Deviation
101
4.24 Task-Portal Fit 2 Frequency Analysis 103
4.25 Task-Portal Fit 2 Mean and Standard Deviation 103
4.26 Students’ Satisfaction with the Portal 104
4.27 Additional Features in the IIUM Student Portal 107
4.28 T-test Analysis for Gender towards Students’ Satisfaction 109
4.29 T-test Analysis for Ethnicity toward Students’ Satisfaction
with IIUM Student Portal
110
4.30 Descriptive Statistics for Kulliyyah Group toward
Students’ Satisfaction
111
4.31 One-way ANOVA Analysis for Kulliyyah toward
Students’ Satisfaction
111
4.32 Post-hoc Test for Kulliyyah toward Students’ Satisfaction 111
4.33 Descriptive Statistics for Kulliyyah Group and Gender
toward Students’ Satisfaction
112
4.34 Test for Interaction of Kulliyyah Group and Gender toward
Students’ Satisfaction
113
4.35 Post-hoc Test for Kulliyyah Group and Gender toward
Students’ Satisfaction
113
4.36 Summary of Findings 115
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Page No.
3.1 EUCS Model 30
3.2 Website User Satisfaction (WUS) Model 33
3.3 Website User Satisfaction Model 35
3.4 User Satisfaction with B2E Portal Model 36
3.5 Web-based Customer Support System Satisfaction Model 37
3.6 Relationship between Perceived Website Usability, Trust,
Satisfaction and Loyalty
40
3.7 Task-Technology Fit Model 41
3.8 Theoretical Model for Students’ Satisfaction with IIUM
Student Portal
51
3.9 Data Analysis Strategy 66
4.1 Response Rate Calculation 68
4.2 Theoretical Model for Students’ Satisfaction with IIUM
Student Portal
77
4.3 Estimated Marginal Means for Students’ Satisfaction 114
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
B2B Business-to-Business
B2C Business-to-Consumer
B2E Business-to-Employee
BELS Blended E-Learning System
CFA Confirmatory Factor Analysis
CGPA Cumulative Grade Point Average
CIS Clinical Information System
DF Degree of Freedom
EHR Electronic Health Record
ELS E-Learn Satisfaction
ESS Employee Self-Service
et al. (et alia): and others
EUCS End-User Computing Satisfaction
F F-Ratio
Freq Frequency
i.e. (id est): that is
IIUM International Islamic University
Malaysia
IS Information System
KENMS Kulliyyah of Economics and
Management Sciences
KICT Kulliyyah of Information
Communication and Technology
KIRKHS Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed
Knowledge and Human Sciences
LMS Learning Management System
Mbps Megabit per second
MIM Mobile Instant Message
NPV Net Present Value
QAS Question Answer System
ROI Return on Investment
Std. Dev Standard Deviation
T T-Test Statistics
TTF Task-Technology Fit
UIS User Information Satisfaction
UiTM University of Technology MARA
WELS Web-based E-learner Satisfaction
WUS Website User Satisfaction
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERVIEW
Technology advances have given rise to information overload for individuals,
organisations and institutions. In a rapidly changing environment, individuals now
require a technology enabler to assist them in finding the right information for the
tasks that they need to perform effectively and efficiently. The new millennium sees
more and more individuals getting connected over the Internet. A portal appears to be
the means to this end.
According to Clarke and Flaherty (2003), the word portal is derived from the
Latin word porta which means something that will be passed in order to get to another
place. A Web-based portal functions to assist Web users by leading them to the
ultimate location of their choice (Clarke and Flaherty, 2003). Krishnamurthya and
Chan (2005) defined a portal as a system that gathers a variety of useful information
resources into a single one stop-Web page. This allows its users to customise their
information sources by selecting and viewing information that they find useful.
Past researches suggest that portals have been widely used in government
(Guerrero et al., 2007; Farhan and Sanderson, 2010; Hirwade, 2010), corporate
environment (Detlor, 2000; Dias, 2001; Clarke and Flaherty, 2003; Yang et al., 2005;
Al-Mudimigh et al., 2011; Chang and Wang, 2011), educational institution (Haubitz,
2005; Krishnamurthya and Chan, 2005; Pinto and Doucet, 2007; Chiang et al., 2010),
production (Kreng and Wu, 2007) and health sector (Leveille and Weingart, 2007). A
government portal is developed to fulfil information needs related to government
2
facilities and services, and to allow citizens to communicate with government instead
of visiting the government buildings (Farhan and Sanderson, 2010). In the corporate
environment, a portal is used to integrate knowledge, commerce and collaboration
within internal and external organisations (Chang and Wang, 2011). In the medical
environment, a portal is used to transmit information between patients and doctors
especially chronic problems before scheduled visits (Leveille and Weingart, 2007).
1.2 ORGANISATION OF THE DISSERTATION
The dissertation comprises five chapters. The first chapter discusses an overview of
the research and introduces the research background. The problem statement, research
questions, research objectives and significance of the study are also determined in this
chapter.
Chapter Two provides a review of literature on the research area. Topics
include financial measures for information system success and user satisfaction as a
surrogate measure for measuring information system success. Chapter Three presents
the theories used in the research, theoretical model, research design that covers
population, sampling technique and instrument, and findings of pilot study.
Chapter Four presents the empirical results of the research while the last
chapter concludes the study with research limitations, contributions of the research
and suggestions for future research directions.
3
1.3 THE RESEARCH BACKGROUND
Measuring information system success has been a concern to not only practitioners but
also scholars. The use of financial method in measuring information system success
has been cited as difficult (Saarinen, 1996; Renkemaa and Berghout, 1997; Dehning et
al., 2006; Tuten, 2009). This has brought about the notion of using user satisfaction as
a surrogate measure.
Researchers on portal and student portal have captivated the attention of
scholars in the last decade. For instance Wang (2003), Shee and Wang (2008) and Sun
et al. (2008) investigated student satisfaction with Web-based online learning portal.
Nowadays online learning portal is used as telecommunication technology and
importantly to ease convenience to deliver information for education and training.
Sugianto and Tojib (2006) measured user satisfaction with Business-to-Employee
(B2E) portal where the portal uses a Web-based interface to access personalised
information, company resources, applications, and e-commerce options. Konradt et al.
(2006) measured employee satisfaction with Employee Self-Service corporate Web-
portal that enables company employees to view, create and maintain relevant
personnel information. Farhan and Sanderson (2010) measured citizen satisfaction
with Kuwait e-government portal in order to assess system success.
In Malaysia, Mohamed et al. (2009) investigated end-users’ satisfaction with
Malaysia’s Electronic Government Systems: E-procurement, E-services, Generic
Office Environment, Human Resource Management Information Systems, Project
Monitoring Systems and Electronic Labour Exchange. Masrek et al. (2009) evaluated
students’ satisfaction with academic library portal where the portal provides
personalised and customised information service to all kinds of library resources and
services.
4
1.4 THE CONTEXT OF STUDY AND PROBLEM STATEMENT
The focus of the dissertation is on the evaluation of user satisfaction with an
educational portal. An educational portal is a single integrated point that provides its
users with a useful and comprehensive access to information contents. Typically, the
scope includes information searching, educational resources, interactive teaching
materials, interpersonal communication, training and assessment (Pinto and Doucet,
2007).
The International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) has adopted a Web-
portal to manage the information and knowledge among students, academic and
administrative personnel since 2006. The portal is known as MyIIUM. It was
developed and is currently managed by the university’s Information Technology
Division (ITD). The MyIIUM portal link is available at IIUM Website for users to
access it. The MyIIUM portal is a tool and interface for the IIUM community to
access and leverage on online resources available within the institution. The portal
implementation was made in two stages i.e. the first phase was commissioned in
August 2006 for students and the second phase was in November 2006 for the
university’s personnel.
The users of MyIIUM Student Portal include students from IIUM Centre for
Foundation Studies in Petaling Jaya and Nilai, undergraduate students and post-
graduate students in both campus in Gombak and Kuantan. MyIIUM Student Portal
provides information about student’s personal information (MyPersonal), student’s
academic information (MyAcademic) and student services (MyServices) and
applications.
MyPersonal section provides information regarding student’s personal
information. This section enables students to view their personal information, study
5
information and disciplinary/compound information. In study information, the portal
provides information about student’s mahallah, financial, scholar and co-curricular
activities. Disciplinary/compound section, information about disciplinary, compound
and traffic summon are displayed.
MyAcademic displays information about programme information, course
information, examination/result information and academic services. Course
information provides information about student’s current semester, course schedule
and previous semester. Students are able to view information on their confirmation
slip, course timetable, examination timetable, result slip and student clearance system
in academic services section.
MyServices provides features such as student’s applications,
collaboration/communication tools, mahallah information, academic services and
reset password. In student’s applications section, hyperlinks to Learning Management
System (LMS), Library, IIUM e-Counseling and Smartcard/Attendance system are
provided for students to easily access them from MyIIUM Student Portal. Likewise,
with the collaboration/communication section, students are able to connect with other
students via webmail, Yahoo mail and Google mail. For mahallah service section,
students are able to register for mahallah such as perform check in/out online, and
view information on mahallah schedule pre-registration. Academic services provided
in MyServices is similar with academic services provided in MyAcademic section.
MyServices also allows students externally to reset student’s pin/password for Google
mail, IIUM Software Repository, library, LMS and Smartcard/Attendance. The
Miscellaneous section allows students to gain information in getting connected to
IIUM Wireless, and to register and verify MAC address for his/her computer
workstation.
6
Since the MyIIUM Student Portal was implemented, to the best of the
researcher’s knowledge, there has not been a study carried out to gain insight into
students’ satisfaction with the portal. An insight into students’ satisfaction may assist
in identifying potential improvement areas for the IIUM Information Technology
Division (ITD) when prioritising required actions for the student portal.
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
In guiding the research, the following questions were formulated:
1. What is the level of student’s satisfaction with the IIUM Student Portal?
2. Is there a significant difference in individual/student’s characteristics for
students’ satisfaction with the IIUM Student Portal?
a) Is there a significant difference in students’ satisfaction with the IIUM
Student Portal for male and female?
b) Is there a significant difference in students’ satisfaction with the IIUM
Student Portal for Malaysian and non-Malaysian students?
c) Is there a significant difference in students’ satisfaction with the IIUM
Student Portal for Information Technology, Islamic Revealed Knowledge
and Human Science and Economics and Management Science students?
d) Is there a significance difference in the effect of students’ academic
programme on students’ satisfaction with the IIUM Student Portal for
male and female?
7
1.6 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The research objectives of this study are to answer the above research questions.
1. To measure students’ satisfaction level with the IIUM Student Portal.
2. To investigate students’ characteristics and students’ satisfaction with the
IIUM Student Portal.
1.7 DEFINITION OF COMMON TERMS
This research uses terminologies like Portal and Satisfaction.
1.7.1 Portal
Dias (2001) defined a portal purpose as “facilitating access to information contained
in documents spread throughout the Internet”. Detlor (2000) defined a corporate portal
as a tool to promote, gather, share and disseminate information within an organisation.
A Web portal is able to provide users with online information and information-related
services such as search function, community building features, commerce offerings,
personal productivity applications and communication channel between portal owner
and users (Yang et al., 2005). In this study, portal refers to a single integrated point to
access to other information, system and link.
1.7.2 Satisfaction
Satisfaction in this research, comprises dimensions that include End-User Computing
Satisfaction (EUCS) (Doll and Torkzadeh, 1988), User Satisfaction with B2E Portal
(Sugianto and Tojib, 2006), Task-Technology Fit (Goodhue and Thompson, 1995),
Service Quality (Ozkan and Keseler, 2009) and WebQual (Loiacono et al., 2002). Doll
and Torzadeh (1988) defined EUCS as “affective attitude towards a specific computer
8
application by someone who interacts with the application directly”. They have
developed five instruments to measure user satisfaction with information system:
content, accuracy, ease of use, timeliness and format. In this study, End-User
Computing Satisfaction refers to the student’s affective attitude towards the IIUM
Student Portal (Doll and Torkzadeh, 1988).
Goodhue and Thompson (1995) defined Task-Technology Fit (TTF) as the
“degree to which a technology assists an individual in performing his/her portfolio of
tasks”. They stressed that information system success need to recognise both the task
for which the technology is used and the fit between the task and the technology. In
this study, TTF refers to student satisfaction with technology ability to fit and support
students learning and administration activities (McGill and Klobas, 2009) while
accommodating them with a variety of student ability such as communication channel,
accessing learning materials and interactive activities.
Trust refers to user’s belief and perception about portal attributes and functions
(Flavian et al., 2006). Security of information provides the assurance of information
confidentiality and frees from security breach issues (Sugianto and Tojib, 2006). Yang
et al., (2005) defined privacy as the promises in the website in protecting user personal
information. In this dissertation, trust refers to an expectation that the promise in the
portal can be relied on (Flavian et al., 2006). Information security refers to assuring
the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information in the portal (Sugianto and
Tojib, 2006). Information privacy refers to the degree that the students’ information is
exposed to others (Yang et al., 2005).
Design quality refers to the quality user experience in using the portal where
the instruments consist of consistent image, relative advantage, visual appeal,
innovativeness (Loiacono et al., 2002) website structure, entry guidance (Muylle et al.,
9
2004) and aesthetic design (Yoo and Donthu, 2001). In this study, portal design
quality refers to the quality of user’s experience with the IIUM Student Portal (Muylle
et al., 2004).
Service quality refers to the users’ overall judgement about system assurance,
empathy, and responsiveness (Ong et al., 2009). In this research, service quality refers
to how well the IIUM Student Portal service delivery matches the user’s expectation
(Negash et al., 2003).
1.8 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
User satisfaction of the system is very important factor for organisations and
institution to determine the system success. This study is expected to contribute for
theoretical framework and portal design.
1.8.1Contributions to Theoretical Framework
This study has developed and tested a theoretical model on satisfaction with an
academic portal in an educational institution. The model was developed based on the
End-User Computing Satisfaction (Doll and Torkzadeh, 1988), User Satisfaction with
B2E Portal (Sugianto and Tojib, 2006), Task-Technology Fit (Goodhue and
Thompson, 1995), Service Quality (Ozkan and Keseler, 2009) and WebQual
(Loiacono et al., 2002).
1.8.2 Contributions to Practice
The research findings are expected to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the
student portal. Thereafter, the IIUM Information Technology Division (ITD) may gain
10
insights into future enhancement areas for the student portal and identify possible
actionable items and prioritise them accordingly.
1.9 CHAPTER SUMMARY
This chapter has introduced the research area that includes research background,
research context and problem statement, research questions and research objectives.
The next chapter will present a review of literature on information system success
measurement approaches.