Upload
malcolm-bishop
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Measurement Uncertainty
Measurements
• Accuracy - hitting the center of the target
• Precision - tight pattern of hits
• Bias - all two inches high
• Uncertainty - circle containing 95% hits
Traceability
• Accuracy - close to system limitation
• Precision - range
• Bias - identified and corrected for
• Acceptable Uncertainty - 2 sigma
• Unbroken links to national standards
Calibration Traceability
• Unbroken linkage to national standards
• Uncertainty - elements identified and quantified
• Strong QC/QA program
• Periodic MQA testing
Measurement Traceability
• Starts with calibration uncertainty
• Identifies and quantifies all factors that affect the quality of a measurement
• Requires reproducibility
• Testing usually required to validate values
How this affects you
• Did I make the measurement right?
• Is it reproducible?
• What uncertainty is involved?
• Can I cite them for a violation?
2 cases, more than 2 results
• Package survey of radioactive material
• Mammography machine measurements
Package
• 31x31x27 cm
• Bicron RSO-50E
• Calibrated by secondary laboratory
• Maximum surface dose rate measured is 0.4 uSv/h (0.4 mR/h)
• Traveling by air
IATA (ST-1 Requirements)
• Accuracy - so that correctly labeled
• Precision/uncertainty - based on package surface to detector center distance
• Bias - as high as a factor of 4 low
ST-2 Measurement Guidance
a
D/P Distance Package Length CF
5 cm 20 - 40 cm
40 - 100 cm
>100 cm
2.3
1.6
1.0
Correction factors for package and detector sizes
Mammography Measurements
• Exposure at skin entrance
• Half value layer
• Non-invasive kVp measurements
• Mean glandular dose calculation
X-ray vs. Mammo Probes
Energy Response 10x5-6 vs 105-6M
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
HVL (mm Al)
Ind
ica
ted
vs.
Tru
e
10x5 -6 probe
10x5 -6M
Phantom Variability
0.94
0.95
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.99
1.00
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
Normalization Factor
1202 2202 2203 1200 2790 8665 2791
Serial Number
Phantom Attenuation Variability
Temperature Effects
MDH 1515 Temperature Effect
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
2020
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Minutes since brought indoors
mR/
min
HVL MeasurementsHVL Variation Due to Curve Fit
5.41
5.51
5.61
0.29 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.4 0.41
mm Al
ln o
f exp
osur
e
6 Points(FDA method - 0.3095 mm Al)
3 points (drop 0.2 mm Al - 0.3027 mmAl) (ACR method)
data points
MQSA method
ACR method
Non Invasive kVp Measurements
kVp Filter Dependence
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
22 24 26 28 30 32
Measured kVp
kV C
orr
ect
ion 0.015 mm Mo
0.02 mm Mo
0.025 mm Mo
0.03 mm Mo
0.035 mm Mo
Example of How Combined Uncertainties EffectMeasurement
0.03Machine Repro.
0.01Rate Dependence
0.01Energy Dependence
0.01Temp/Pressure
0.015Meter Calibration
Estimated Std. Dev.Component
(Cont.)
Example of How Combined Uncertainties EffectMeasurement
0.0070.02kVp (+/- 1 kVp)
0.020.06HVL(+/-0.02mmAl)
0.020.06Phantom Variability
0.020.06Probe Placement
Estimated Std. Dev.
Estimated Max. Dev.Component
Estimate Std Deviation as Max Deviation/3 (NCRP Report 112)
(Cont.)
Combined Uncertainty
• Total estimated uncertainty
• ( 1.52+ 12+ 12+12+ 32+ 22 + 22 + 22 + 0.72)1/2 = 5.2
• To estimate a confidence level of 95% use a coverage factor of 2 = 2 x 5.2 = 10.4 %