Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Measurement of in-reactor
stress relaxation in pre-
irradiated zirconium alloys by four-point bend technique
19th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ZIRCONIUM IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY
May 21, 2019
http://www.epri.com/https://www.linkedin.com/company/eprihttps://www.facebook.com/EPRI/https://twitter.com/EPRINews
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m2
Acknowledgments
▪ Work performed during 2003-16 in the NFIR Program
▪ Coauthors:
Yagnik, Suresh (EPRI, USA)
Arimescu, Ioan (Framatome, USA)
Adamson, Ronald (Zircology Plus, USA)
Kobylyansky, Gennady (RIAR, Russian Federation)
Seryodkin, Sergey (RIAR, Russian Federation)
Obukhov, Alexander (RIAR, Russian Federation)
▪ Valuable discussions:
Ramasubramanian, Natesan (Eccatec, Inc)
NFIR Steering Committee members
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m3
Presentation Outline
▪ Objective and Approach
– Principle of four-point bend (4 PB) technique
▪ Experimental
– Loading fixture (‘Case’), ‘Relaxometer’, ‘Movable element’
– Materials investigated
▪ Results and Discussions
– In-reactor stress relaxation (SR) tests
– Out-reactor SR tests
– Post-test examinations
▪ Data Trends and Analyses
– Application of a creep law
▪ Key Conclusions
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m4
Creep and Stress Relaxation
▪ Objective:
– Elucidate irradiation creep behavior in Zr-alloys:
▪ What factors contribute to it?
▪ Does it increase at high fluence as does irradiation growth?
▪ What is the effect of pre-irradiation dose?
▪ Application of a creep law to stress-relaxation data
▪ Approach:
– Application of 4 PB technique to pre-irradiated specimens in and out of irradiation flux
▪ Ttest : 315 ± 5°C
▪ Pre-irradiation dose ranged from 0 (unirradiated) to 34 dpa
▪ Negligible incremental dose (~ 0.26 dpa) during maximum of 2600 hr exposure in RBT-6 reactor (Flux: 2 x 1017 n/m2/s; Dose rate: 3 x 10-8 dpa/s)
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m5
Principle of 4PB Technique For rectangular sample with 4PB loading, stress s is compressive at
inner fiber and tensile at outer fiber:h – sample thickness
L – length between inner supports
a – lengths between inner and
Outer supports
b – sample width
P – applied load
Maximum stress
ǀ𝝈ǀ=𝟔𝒂𝑷
𝒃𝒉𝟐
Deflection ya is related to sample
geometry and elastic modulus by
classical elastic beam theory
𝒚𝒂= 𝟐𝑷𝒂𝟐 𝟐𝒂+𝟑𝑳
𝑬𝒃𝒉𝟑
Eliminating P between the two Eqs:
𝝈 =𝟑𝒚𝒂𝑬𝒉
𝒂 𝟐𝒂 + 𝟑𝑳
The sample is bent to get desired range of 𝝈 ..and as the initial elastic strain is gradually converted to
permanent creep:
𝜖𝑐 =𝜎0 − 𝜎
𝐸
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m6
Experimental
Loading fixture (‘Case’):• Can apply 4 PB on up to 6
samples (size 35 x 6.5 x 0.8
mm)
• Is tested in-flux (RBT-6
reactor) and out flux
Movable element:• Applies load on a pair of
samples at a time at room
temp
• Load is applied through
‘Relaxometer’ (next slide)
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m7
Experimental (cont’d)
▪ Relaxometer:
– Applies a load measured by a load cell
– The load imparts 4 PB on the samples
▪ Schematic of load application on samples:
– 3 regions with downward motion of stressor toward sample loader
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m8
Experimental (cont’d)
▪ Typical Relaxometer data:
▪ Test rig:– Can accommodate up to 4 ‘Cases’ in a leak-tight
moisture free environment with hydrogen getter
– Thermocouple attached to dummy samples
– Controllable heating unit to maintain temp (Ttest : 315 ± 5°C)
– Similar setup for in- and out-reactor testing
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m9
Materials Investigated
▪ Most SR tests performed on pre-irradiated samples (4-34 dpa) – From a previous irradiation program in BOR-60 (See Yagnik et.al. STP-1597)
– Test matrix also included unirradiated archives (0 dpa)
– A total of 24 Zr-alloy variants tested: 18 in-reactor; 6 out-reactor
▪ RXA Zircaloy-2 variant served as a reference material with 10, 119, and 339 ppm uniform [H]
▪ High Fe Zircaloy-2 (Ziron) samples with 2 different textures (longitudinal and transverse)
▪ Also included Nb-containing alloys ‘Zirlo-like’ and ‘M5-like’:– One ‘M5-like’ sample had 119 ppm [H]
▪ Out-reactor tests included Nb-containing samples only
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m10
Results (SR data): Load
Change vs. Test Duration:
In-reactor
Out-reactor
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m11
Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)
Zr-2 RXA (w/o H charging)—various exposures▪ Pre-irradiation dose has very little
effect on the shape of SR curve
▪ More than half of the relaxation occurs in first 400 h
▪ A quasi steady state seems to have reached at longer time– Rate of decline in stress is considerably
lower (and almost linear)
▪ Note: Irradiation hardening is almost saturated at 4 dpa– Incremental dpa in RBT-6 (~ 0.26 dpa) is
small compared to the lowest pre-irradiation dose
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m12
Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots);
Zr-2 RXA (with [H])—approx. same exposure▪ Hydrides have no effect on SR
▪ 70% cold work appear to have marginally higher load drop at short times
▪ The hardness of these variants should be about the same due to similar range of exposures
– Literature (Yagnik et. al.): hardness values for Zr-2 at 34 dpa: 277-294 Hv
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m13
Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)— contd.
‘M5 like’—different exposures and [H]
▪ Unirradiated (0 dpa) ‘M5-like’ variant has very high initial SR rate
▪ For pre-irradiated ‘M5-like’ variant with 119 ppm [H], initial SR rate increases by a small amount, in comparison with no pre-hydriding
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m14
Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)— contd.
‘Zirlo like’—different exposures ▪ Unirradiated (0 dpa) ‘Zirlo-like’ variant has very low initial SR rate
– Different behavior compared to ‘M5-like’ variant at 0 dpa(previous slide)
▪ The reasons behind this difference compared to ‘M5-like’ is not clear
▪ RXA Ziracloy-2 (prior slide) shows that SR rate didn’t depend on pre-irradiation dose
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m15
Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)
Comparison of SR rates:
Zircaloy-2, ‘Zirlo like’, and ‘M5-like’ at 23 dpa▪ Zircaloy-2 and ‘M5 like’ have rather
similar SR behaviors
▪ But ‘Zirlo-like’ material has much higher primary (i.e., initial) SR
▪ Both are RXA
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m16
Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)— contd.
‘Ziron’—different texture at 23 dpa▪ Texture has a significant effect
– Longitudinal Ziron (f=0.07) relaxes much slower than transverse sample (f=0.25)
– This unexpected effect of texture in sheet samples (compared to tube material) is not well understood
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m17
Results: Out-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)
‘M5 like’—0 and 17 dpa ‘Zirlo like’—different exposures
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Pt/
P0, re
l. u
nit
Duration, h
A10B 0 dpa A10L 17 dpa A10F 17 dpa
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Pt/
P0, re
l. u
nit
Duration, h
A20O 0 dpa A20N 12 dpa A20F 23 dpa
▪ For comparable materials and dpa, out-reactor SR rates are much lower than in-reactor ones
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m18
Post-test TEM: Dislocation characteristics
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m19
Post-test TEM: Dislocation images (examples)
Initial dislocations in unirradiated RXA Zr-2
loops at 23 dpa RXA Zr-2
(no H-charged)
loops at 23 dpa RXA Zr-2
(116 ppm [H])
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m20
Application of a phenomenological creep model
During SR tests, the total strain remains constant, but its elastic stain component 𝜺𝒆 decreases while creep strain component 𝜺𝒄 increases with time
A time-hardening equation for creep
strain rate can be described as
K and m are model parameters
𝒏 ≈ 𝟏 for low strain regimes
Further mathematical treatment yields
Parameters KE and m were fitted to experimental stress (or load) ratios of SR data and then
by using 𝜖𝑐 =𝜎0 − 𝜎
𝐸
Experimentally derived creep strain 𝜺𝒄 were calculated. They are plotted on the next slide.
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m21
Application of a phenomenological creep model— Cont’d
In-reactor data for Zircaloy-2 Out-reactor data: Nb-containing alloys
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m22
Key conclusions (SR behavior)
▪ An initial high SR rate is normally observed (primary transient stress decrease during the first 400 hours)
– It is in this regime that most differences between material variants are observed.
▪ Differences in longer-term quasi steady state SR rates are relatively small, with a few outliers.
▪ Generally, in-reactor SR rates are significantly higher than out-reactor ones for specimens of similar pre-irradiation fluences
– For both primary-transient, as well as for the long-term steady-state SR regimes.
▪ Among the four alloy types studied, ‘M5-like’, Zircaloy-2 and Ziron have similar SR rates, while ‘Zirlo-like’ has a higher initial transient rate.
▪ The pre-irradiation dose of specific materials does not significantly affect the SR rates
– Since -component dislocation loops exist at high dpa but not at low dpa, this indicates that loops do not influence the mechanism or magnitude of SR.
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m23
Key conclusions—(cont’d)
▪ For Zircaloy-2, 70% cold work has only a small effect on SR. Note that at > 4dpa the strength of RXA and CW Zircaloy-2 are much closer due to irradiation hardening effect.
▪ For Zircaloy-2, neither 116 nor 339 ppm hydrogen contents have any noticeable effect on SR rates. For ‘M5-like’, 119 ppm hydrogen content has only a small effect on the initial transient rate.
▪ Among pre-irradiated materials, a relatively high initial transient SR rate is observed for the ‘Zirlo-like’ alloy.
▪ Among unirradiated materials, a relatively high initial transient SR rate is observed for the ‘M5-like’ alloy.
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m24
Key conclusions—(cont’d)
▪ The creep strain was calculated from the SR data using a specific phenomenological model.
– For Zircaloy-2 samples the creep rate during the quasi steady state stage is in a relatively narrow range of (7–9) x 10-7 s-1
– The unirradiated Zircalo-2 sample shows the highest creep, in agreement with its largest magnitude of SR and known creep strengthening impact of fast fluence
▪ Based on relatively low applied stress (64-102 MPa), the use of stress exponent of 1 is justified, which implies that diffusion creep is likely most dominant creep mechanism in this study.
http://www.epri.com/
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m25
Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity
http://www.epri.com/