25
© 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. www.epri.com Measurement of in-reactor stress relaxation in pre- irradiated zirconium alloys by four-point bend technique 19 th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ZIRCONIUM IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY May 21, 2019

Measurement of in-reactor stress relaxation in pre- irradiated ... - … · 2019. 6. 26. · moisture free environment with hydrogen getter – Thermocouple attached to dummy samples

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m

    Measurement of in-reactor

    stress relaxation in pre-

    irradiated zirconium alloys by four-point bend technique

    19th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ZIRCONIUM IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY

    May 21, 2019

    http://www.epri.com/https://www.linkedin.com/company/eprihttps://www.facebook.com/EPRI/https://twitter.com/EPRINews

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m2

    Acknowledgments

    ▪ Work performed during 2003-16 in the NFIR Program

    ▪ Coauthors:

    Yagnik, Suresh (EPRI, USA)

    Arimescu, Ioan (Framatome, USA)

    Adamson, Ronald (Zircology Plus, USA)

    Kobylyansky, Gennady (RIAR, Russian Federation)

    Seryodkin, Sergey (RIAR, Russian Federation)

    Obukhov, Alexander (RIAR, Russian Federation)

    ▪ Valuable discussions:

    Ramasubramanian, Natesan (Eccatec, Inc)

    NFIR Steering Committee members

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m3

    Presentation Outline

    ▪ Objective and Approach

    – Principle of four-point bend (4 PB) technique

    ▪ Experimental

    – Loading fixture (‘Case’), ‘Relaxometer’, ‘Movable element’

    – Materials investigated

    ▪ Results and Discussions

    – In-reactor stress relaxation (SR) tests

    – Out-reactor SR tests

    – Post-test examinations

    ▪ Data Trends and Analyses

    – Application of a creep law

    ▪ Key Conclusions

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m4

    Creep and Stress Relaxation

    ▪ Objective:

    – Elucidate irradiation creep behavior in Zr-alloys:

    ▪ What factors contribute to it?

    ▪ Does it increase at high fluence as does irradiation growth?

    ▪ What is the effect of pre-irradiation dose?

    ▪ Application of a creep law to stress-relaxation data

    ▪ Approach:

    – Application of 4 PB technique to pre-irradiated specimens in and out of irradiation flux

    ▪ Ttest : 315 ± 5°C

    ▪ Pre-irradiation dose ranged from 0 (unirradiated) to 34 dpa

    ▪ Negligible incremental dose (~ 0.26 dpa) during maximum of 2600 hr exposure in RBT-6 reactor (Flux: 2 x 1017 n/m2/s; Dose rate: 3 x 10-8 dpa/s)

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m5

    Principle of 4PB Technique For rectangular sample with 4PB loading, stress s is compressive at

    inner fiber and tensile at outer fiber:h – sample thickness

    L – length between inner supports

    a – lengths between inner and

    Outer supports

    b – sample width

    P – applied load

    Maximum stress

    ǀ𝝈ǀ=𝟔𝒂𝑷

    𝒃𝒉𝟐

    Deflection ya is related to sample

    geometry and elastic modulus by

    classical elastic beam theory

    𝒚𝒂= 𝟐𝑷𝒂𝟐 𝟐𝒂+𝟑𝑳

    𝑬𝒃𝒉𝟑

    Eliminating P between the two Eqs:

    𝝈 =𝟑𝒚𝒂𝑬𝒉

    𝒂 𝟐𝒂 + 𝟑𝑳

    The sample is bent to get desired range of 𝝈 ..and as the initial elastic strain is gradually converted to

    permanent creep:

    𝜖𝑐 =𝜎0 − 𝜎

    𝐸

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m6

    Experimental

    Loading fixture (‘Case’):• Can apply 4 PB on up to 6

    samples (size 35 x 6.5 x 0.8

    mm)

    • Is tested in-flux (RBT-6

    reactor) and out flux

    Movable element:• Applies load on a pair of

    samples at a time at room

    temp

    • Load is applied through

    ‘Relaxometer’ (next slide)

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m7

    Experimental (cont’d)

    ▪ Relaxometer:

    – Applies a load measured by a load cell

    – The load imparts 4 PB on the samples

    ▪ Schematic of load application on samples:

    – 3 regions with downward motion of stressor toward sample loader

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m8

    Experimental (cont’d)

    ▪ Typical Relaxometer data:

    ▪ Test rig:– Can accommodate up to 4 ‘Cases’ in a leak-tight

    moisture free environment with hydrogen getter

    – Thermocouple attached to dummy samples

    – Controllable heating unit to maintain temp (Ttest : 315 ± 5°C)

    – Similar setup for in- and out-reactor testing

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m9

    Materials Investigated

    ▪ Most SR tests performed on pre-irradiated samples (4-34 dpa) – From a previous irradiation program in BOR-60 (See Yagnik et.al. STP-1597)

    – Test matrix also included unirradiated archives (0 dpa)

    – A total of 24 Zr-alloy variants tested: 18 in-reactor; 6 out-reactor

    ▪ RXA Zircaloy-2 variant served as a reference material with 10, 119, and 339 ppm uniform [H]

    ▪ High Fe Zircaloy-2 (Ziron) samples with 2 different textures (longitudinal and transverse)

    ▪ Also included Nb-containing alloys ‘Zirlo-like’ and ‘M5-like’:– One ‘M5-like’ sample had 119 ppm [H]

    ▪ Out-reactor tests included Nb-containing samples only

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m10

    Results (SR data): Load

    Change vs. Test Duration:

    In-reactor

    Out-reactor

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m11

    Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)

    Zr-2 RXA (w/o H charging)—various exposures▪ Pre-irradiation dose has very little

    effect on the shape of SR curve

    ▪ More than half of the relaxation occurs in first 400 h

    ▪ A quasi steady state seems to have reached at longer time– Rate of decline in stress is considerably

    lower (and almost linear)

    ▪ Note: Irradiation hardening is almost saturated at 4 dpa– Incremental dpa in RBT-6 (~ 0.26 dpa) is

    small compared to the lowest pre-irradiation dose

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m12

    Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots);

    Zr-2 RXA (with [H])—approx. same exposure▪ Hydrides have no effect on SR

    ▪ 70% cold work appear to have marginally higher load drop at short times

    ▪ The hardness of these variants should be about the same due to similar range of exposures

    – Literature (Yagnik et. al.): hardness values for Zr-2 at 34 dpa: 277-294 Hv

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m13

    Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)— contd.

    ‘M5 like’—different exposures and [H]

    ▪ Unirradiated (0 dpa) ‘M5-like’ variant has very high initial SR rate

    ▪ For pre-irradiated ‘M5-like’ variant with 119 ppm [H], initial SR rate increases by a small amount, in comparison with no pre-hydriding

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m14

    Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)— contd.

    ‘Zirlo like’—different exposures ▪ Unirradiated (0 dpa) ‘Zirlo-like’ variant has very low initial SR rate

    – Different behavior compared to ‘M5-like’ variant at 0 dpa(previous slide)

    ▪ The reasons behind this difference compared to ‘M5-like’ is not clear

    ▪ RXA Ziracloy-2 (prior slide) shows that SR rate didn’t depend on pre-irradiation dose

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m15

    Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)

    Comparison of SR rates:

    Zircaloy-2, ‘Zirlo like’, and ‘M5-like’ at 23 dpa▪ Zircaloy-2 and ‘M5 like’ have rather

    similar SR behaviors

    ▪ But ‘Zirlo-like’ material has much higher primary (i.e., initial) SR

    ▪ Both are RXA

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m16

    Results: In-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)— contd.

    ‘Ziron’—different texture at 23 dpa▪ Texture has a significant effect

    – Longitudinal Ziron (f=0.07) relaxes much slower than transverse sample (f=0.25)

    – This unexpected effect of texture in sheet samples (compared to tube material) is not well understood

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m17

    Results: Out-reactor (Load ratio vs. time plots)

    ‘M5 like’—0 and 17 dpa ‘Zirlo like’—different exposures

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0.8

    0.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    0 500 1000 1500 2000

    Pt/

    P0, re

    l. u

    nit

    Duration, h

    A10B 0 dpa A10L 17 dpa A10F 17 dpa

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0.8

    0.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    0 500 1000 1500 2000

    Pt/

    P0, re

    l. u

    nit

    Duration, h

    A20O 0 dpa A20N 12 dpa A20F 23 dpa

    ▪ For comparable materials and dpa, out-reactor SR rates are much lower than in-reactor ones

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m18

    Post-test TEM: Dislocation characteristics

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m19

    Post-test TEM: Dislocation images (examples)

    Initial dislocations in unirradiated RXA Zr-2

    loops at 23 dpa RXA Zr-2

    (no H-charged)

    loops at 23 dpa RXA Zr-2

    (116 ppm [H])

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m20

    Application of a phenomenological creep model

    During SR tests, the total strain remains constant, but its elastic stain component 𝜺𝒆 decreases while creep strain component 𝜺𝒄 increases with time

    A time-hardening equation for creep

    strain rate can be described as

    K and m are model parameters

    𝒏 ≈ 𝟏 for low strain regimes

    Further mathematical treatment yields

    Parameters KE and m were fitted to experimental stress (or load) ratios of SR data and then

    by using 𝜖𝑐 =𝜎0 − 𝜎

    𝐸

    Experimentally derived creep strain 𝜺𝒄 were calculated. They are plotted on the next slide.

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m21

    Application of a phenomenological creep model— Cont’d

    In-reactor data for Zircaloy-2 Out-reactor data: Nb-containing alloys

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m22

    Key conclusions (SR behavior)

    ▪ An initial high SR rate is normally observed (primary transient stress decrease during the first 400 hours)

    – It is in this regime that most differences between material variants are observed.

    ▪ Differences in longer-term quasi steady state SR rates are relatively small, with a few outliers.

    ▪ Generally, in-reactor SR rates are significantly higher than out-reactor ones for specimens of similar pre-irradiation fluences

    – For both primary-transient, as well as for the long-term steady-state SR regimes.

    ▪ Among the four alloy types studied, ‘M5-like’, Zircaloy-2 and Ziron have similar SR rates, while ‘Zirlo-like’ has a higher initial transient rate.

    ▪ The pre-irradiation dose of specific materials does not significantly affect the SR rates

    – Since -component dislocation loops exist at high dpa but not at low dpa, this indicates that loops do not influence the mechanism or magnitude of SR.

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m23

    Key conclusions—(cont’d)

    ▪ For Zircaloy-2, 70% cold work has only a small effect on SR. Note that at > 4dpa the strength of RXA and CW Zircaloy-2 are much closer due to irradiation hardening effect.

    ▪ For Zircaloy-2, neither 116 nor 339 ppm hydrogen contents have any noticeable effect on SR rates. For ‘M5-like’, 119 ppm hydrogen content has only a small effect on the initial transient rate.

    ▪ Among pre-irradiated materials, a relatively high initial transient SR rate is observed for the ‘Zirlo-like’ alloy.

    ▪ Among unirradiated materials, a relatively high initial transient SR rate is observed for the ‘M5-like’ alloy.

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m24

    Key conclusions—(cont’d)

    ▪ The creep strain was calculated from the SR data using a specific phenomenological model.

    – For Zircaloy-2 samples the creep rate during the quasi steady state stage is in a relatively narrow range of (7–9) x 10-7 s-1

    – The unirradiated Zircalo-2 sample shows the highest creep, in agreement with its largest magnitude of SR and known creep strengthening impact of fast fluence

    ▪ Based on relatively low applied stress (64-102 MPa), the use of stress exponent of 1 is justified, which implies that diffusion creep is likely most dominant creep mechanism in this study.

    http://www.epri.com/

  • © 2019 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m25

    Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity

    http://www.epri.com/