94
Measurement of Bc in Measurement of Bc in CDF CDF Ilsung Cho Yonsei University , Seoul Korea

Measurement of Bc in CDF Ilsung Cho Yonsei University, Seoul Korea

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Measurement of Bc in CDF Ilsung Cho Yonsei University, Seoul Korea
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • The 1 st day of Universe In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And God said: 'Let there be light.' And there was light. - Genesis chapter 1 ? ? ? ? ?
  • Slide 4
  • 4 What is the world made of? What holds the world together? Where did we come from?
  • Slide 5
  • 5 Standard Model Particle physics field has been tremendously successful in creating and establishing Standard Model of Particle Physics answering what the universe is made of and how it works. Answers themselves led to even more questions
  • Slide 6
  • 6 top quark anti-top quark Z W +, W -.. e e - u d s c b gluons Elementary Particles Elementary Particles e e + u d s c b - - - - ( Mass proportional to area shown: proton mass = ) Are they the smallest things? Why are there so many? Where does mass come from?
  • Slide 7
  • 7 Everything is made of electrons, u quarks and d quarks Dark Matter ??? Galaxies are held together by mass far bigger (x5) than all stars combined.
  • Slide 8
  • 8 1. Are there undiscovered principles of nature: New symmetries, new physical laws? 2. How can we solve the mystery of dark energy? 3. Are there extra dimensions of space? 4. Do all the forces become one? 5. Why are there so many kinds of particles? 6. What is dark matter? How can we make it in the laboratory? 7. What are neutrinos telling us? 8. How did the universe come to be? 9. What happened to the antimatter? Questions remained unsolved yet . Origin of Mass Unification Energy Frontier Colliders
  • Slide 9
  • 9 Hadron Collider
  • Slide 10
  • 10 Collider Parameters : Energy Total E 2 : CM frame : Energy limit : Synchrotron radiation Boost factor
  • Slide 11
  • 11 Collider Parameters : Luminosity The number of particles passing each other unit area x unit time x unit transverse area Defined as 1year ~ x10 7 sec time to operate ~1year/
  • Slide 12
  • 36 proton and antiproton bunches 396 ns bunch crossing 2.5Mhz The Worlds highest energy hadron collider Instantaneous Luminosity : 1.2 x 10 32 cm -2 s -1
  • Slide 13
  • 13 Event identifying tool : Detector & Trigger Detector & Trigger
  • Slide 14
  • 14 Our EYE : Detector Z R Z direction : normally choose beam direction Use cylindrical coordinate Pseudo rapidity 45 degree =1 =-1
  • Slide 15
  • 15 Our EYE : Collider detector Particle detection is based on its interactions with matter of the detectors Modern multipurpose collider detector Stable particle( interacting particle) : P, e, K, ,
  • Slide 16
  • Silicon vertex detector Central Outer Tracker Time of Flight Solenoid coil Calorimeter Muon chamber Inherited from Run I Central Calorimeter (||
  • 39 Cross section We choose to use pT(Bc)>4, |y(Bc)|
  • 40 ratio =0.282 0.038(stat.) 0.035(yield) 0.065(acceptance) R K : Kinematics acceptance ratio = 4.42 0.08(stat.) 1.02(syst.) R : Electron reconstruction ratio = 1/ (eID) 1/(63%) N(B + )=2872 59 Cross section ratio is defined within our kinematical limits p T (B) > 4.0GeV, |y(B)| < 1.0 Cross section
  • Slide 41
  • 41 Lifetime measurement Proton Anti proton Lxy Muon Electron neutrino electron Primary vertex Secondary vertex Because of undetectable neutrino we cannt calculate Bc momentum directly Use MC simulation and the reconstructed momentum of J/ e pair to estimate Bc momentum (K-factor) Where a is the angle between the vector of pT(J/ +e) and pT(Bc) Pseudo-proper decay length
  • Slide 42
  • 42 Fake electron : J/ +track with electron fake rates Fake J/ : Sideband in J/ +track candidates Residual conversion : J/ +tagged conv. electron with conversion finding efficiency b-bbar : PYTHIA MC but with change of GS/FE/FC for systematic error Prompt : Assume to be a resolution function Background shape determination
  • Slide 43
  • 43 Background shape determination Fake electron Fake J/ bbBAR Residual conversion
  • Slide 44
  • 44 Lifetime fitting result c (Bc) = 139.0 + 22.1/-19.5 (stat.) 10.8 (syst.) m (Bc) = 0.463 +0.073/-0.065(stat.) 0.036(syst.) ps
  • Slide 45
  • 45 Hadronic decay channel bcbc cccc e, , u, e, , d, J/ BcBc
  • Slide 46
  • 46 Bc J/ , J/ channel : 3 track topology Precise mass measurement possible Proton Anti proton Bc decays in the beam pipe line Muon Muon detector + Tracker Tracker Need aggressive 2 nd vertex resolution to reduce backgrounds Muon system J/ trigger Calorimeter Electron ID Tracking system (COT) High efficiency tracking dE/dx for electron ID Tracking system (Silicon) Good vertex resolution Which information is needed ? Which information is needed ?
  • Slide 47
  • 47 Prompt J/ + track from PV Search range : 6.4 +- 2 s 5.6 to 7.2 GeV Backgrounds : Key elements for Bc analysis B-Bbar background Muon B+ B0 Muon Cut optimization : Signal from MC and background from data, choose max significant point Tight vertex requirements
  • Slide 48
  • 48 Bc J/ reconstruction Num(events) FIT = 38.9 sig 26.1 bkg between 6.24-6.3 Significance > 6 over search area 0.36 fb -1 ~0.8 fb -1 ~0.7 fb -1 ~0.6 fb -1 ~0.5 fb -1 Mass = 6275.2 4.3(stat.) 2.3(syst.) MeV/c 2
  • Slide 49
  • 49 Cross section ratio between B c + J/ e + and B + J/ K + for p T (B)>4GeV, |y(B)|
  • Slide 50
  • 50 Do we need more physics ???
  • Slide 51
  • 51 e + e - superparticle ~ e spin 1/2 spin 0 M e M e Symmetry between fermions (matter) and bosons (forces) Undiscovered new symmetry SUSY solves Standard Model problems: Origin of Mass Origin of Mass : Higgs mass calculation Unification Dark Matter SUSY provides a candidate particle for Dark Matter Laws of Nature will be much more elegant at high energy. ~ e SUSY
  • Slide 52
  • 52 SUSY Supersymmetry contains squarks and sleptons. Squark mass matrixes contain information on SUSY breaking mechanisms &/or GUT scale interactions. Quark flavor changing neutral current processes, e.g. B S or D 0 mixing, are sensitive to the off-diagonal elements of the squark mass matrix
  • Slide 53
  • 53 MSSM Measurements Contributions to B s mixing ~10 x SM CP asymmetry 0.1sin cos sin( m s t), ~10 x SM Asym =(M W /m squark ) 2 sin( ), ~0 in SM Contributions to direct CP violing decay B - K - vs B + K + b sss
  • Slide 54
  • 54 Bs (FCNC decay) From Okada ICHEP 2006
  • 71 Kinematical limit on cross section = x-section for B meson certain kinematical range We choose to use pT(Bc)>4, |y(Bc)|
  • 73 ratio =0.282 0.038(stat.) 0.035(yield) 0.065(acceptance) R K : Kinematics acceptance ratio = 4.42 0.08(stat.) 1.02(syst.) R : Electron reconstruction ratio = 1/ (eID) 1/(63%) N(B + )=2872 59 Cross section ratio is defined within our kinematical limits p T (B) > 4.0GeV, |y(B)| < 1.0 Cross section
  • Slide 74
  • 74 Lifetime measurement Proton Anti proton Lxy Muon Electron neutrino electron Primary vertex Secondary vertex Because of undetectable neutrino we cannt calculate Bc momentum directly Use MC simulation and the reconstructed momentum of J/ e pair to estimate Bc momentum (K-factor) Where a is the angle between the vector of pT(J/ +e) and pT(Bc) Pseudo-proper decay length
  • Slide 75
  • 75 Strategy for lifetime measurement Fake electron, Residual conversion, bbBAR and fake J/ K-factor estimation Do the maximum likelihood fitting No L xy cut fake J/ 164.0 9.1 fake electron 110.2 19.0 conversion electron 67.4 34.8 bb 63.0 18.5 observed J/ e + pairs 783
  • Slide 76
  • 76 K factor Calculate using Monte Carlo simulation Divide K factor with J/ +e mass bin
  • Slide 77
  • 77 Likelihood definition Construct likelihood function including signal and all backgrounds
  • Slide 78
  • 78 Lifetime fitting result c (Bc) = 139.0 + 22.1/-19.5 (stat.) 10.8 (syst.) m (Bc) = 0.463 +0.073/-0.065(stat.) 0.036(syst.) ps
  • Slide 79
  • 79 Mass = 6275.2 4.3(stat.) 2.3(syst.) MeV/c 2 ~0.8 fb -1 Numver of events FIT : Sngnal : 38.9 Backgrounds : 26.1 ( between 6.24-6.3 ) Significance > 6 over search area Bc mass
  • Slide 80
  • 80 Recent lattice QCD calculation PRL 94, 172001 (2005) PLB 453, 289 (1999) m Bc = 6287.0 4.8 1.1 MeV hep-ex/0505076 ( theory-exp)= 12 MeV
  • Slide 81
  • 81 Lifetime measurement Proton Anti proton Lxy Muon Electron neutrino electron Primary vertex Secondary vertex Because of undetectable neutrino we cannt calculate Bc momentum directly Use MC simulation and the reconstructed momentum of J/ y- e pair to estimate Bc momentum (K-factor) Where a is the angle between the vector of pT(J/ y +e) and pT(Bc) Pseudo-proper decay length Play on r f plane
  • Slide 82
  • 82 Lifetime (Semileptoinc Bc J/ e ) c (Bc) = 139.0 + 22.1/-19.5 (stat.) 10.8 (syst.) m (Bc) = 0.463 +0.073/-0.065(stat.) 0.036(syst.) ps V. V. Kiselev, hep-ph/0308214 (2003) : 0.55ps+- 0.15ps
  • Slide 83
  • 83 Bc J/ result : Bc Mass Mass = 6275.2 4.3(stat.) 2.3(syst.) MeV/c 2 ~0.8 fb -1 Significance > 6 s 0.36 fb -1 ~0.8 fb -1 ~0.7 fb -1 ~0.6 fb -1 ~0.5 fb -1
  • Slide 84
  • 84 Recent lattice QCD calculation PRL 94, 172001 (2005) PLB 453, 289 (1999) m Bc = 6287.0 4.8 1.1 MeV hep-ex/0505076 (theory-exp)= 12 MeV
  • Slide 85
  • 85 The Standard Model Theoretical Background Physical States in the Standard Model The gauge bosons: W , g & Z o and the Higgs H o Lagrangian for charged current weak decays Where
  • Slide 86
  • 86 The 6 CKM Triangles Best measured in B s decays There are 4 independent phases: ( can be substituted for or as ) Area of each = A 2 6 , the Jarlskog Invariant
  • Slide 87
  • 87 Some B Meson Decay Diagrams a) is dominant, b) is color suppressed a) & b) are called tree level diagrams
  • Slide 88
  • 88 B s : Mixing in the Standard Model Measurement of B s mixing provides the ratio of V td /V ts which gives the same essential information as B d mixing alone, but with much better control of theory parameters |V td | 2 =A 2 4 [(1- ) 2 + 2 ] |V td | 2 / |V ts | 2 =[(1- ) 2 + 2 ] Circle in ( ) plane centered at (1,0) To relate constraints on CKM matrix in terms of say r & h need to use theoretical estimates of =f B s 2 B B s / f B d 2 B B d
  • Slide 89
  • 89 Bs for each decay mode
  • Slide 90
  • 90 The measured amplitude values and uncertainties versus the Bs s oscillation frequency, Dms
  • Slide 91
  • 91 Observation of Bs Oscillation PRL 97, 242003 2006 Belle PRL 96, 221601 (2006) b d g : |Vtd|/|Vts| = 0.199 +0.026-0.025(exp) +0.018-0.015(theo)
  • Slide 92
  • 92 Physics motivation b s Transitions (Penguins Physics motivation b s Transitions (Penguins ) In SM t in loop dominates and CP asymmetry should be equal to that in J/ K s Other objects in loop, new virtual particles, could interfere So this process is sensitive to new physics
  • Slide 93
  • 93 J/ trigger p T >1.5GeV, | |2GeV, 0.6 8 GeV, e e For Electron cut study
  • Slide 94
  • 94 CPV Measurements in b s We cannot just average these modes, but.... =sin2 =0.500.06 S = 0.520.05-0.68.03 =-0.16 0.06 Does u & c parts of Penguin contribute? Yes but S >0, ~0.1 New Physics???