Upload
miles-osborne
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Measured Progress ©2011
DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER-BASED TESTING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR
STUDENTS WITH VISUAL DISABILITIES
JUNE 27, 2012MINNEAPOLIS, MN
• Goal: Creation of a fully functional computer based testing platform that supports refreshable braille interoperability
• Measured Progress: Development of product, enhancement, alpha and beta testing
• ETS: pilot and field testing
Project Overview
Measured Progress ©2011
Development• Key Steps
1.Creating code that allows the testing platform to communicate directly with commonly used electronic braille displays
2.Expanding meta-tag system to include braille representations of test content
• Capabilities: Focused on enhancing the NimbleTools platform to deliver the following testing accommodations: key-stroke navigation, refreshable braille output, braille keyboard input of responses, screen magnification, and audio output.
Measured Progress ©2011
• NimbleTools computer delivery system
• Freedom Scientific Focus 40 Blue
• 8th Grade level Reading passages and items from the National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
Content and instruments
Measured Progress ©2011
Conducted in Massachusetts in December 2011 with 6 students
• Recommendations
• Improving formatting and layout
• Creating an orientation to familiarize students with the system
• Improving read aloud tool
• Easier navigation of system
Alpha Test
Measured Progress ©2011
• Positive Feedback
• Navigating passage was easy
• Responding to test items on the braille display was unique and more effective than usual response method
• Answer Verification was helpful
Alpha Test II
Measured Progress ©2011
Conducted at the Washington School for the Blind in March with 8 students
• Feedback
• Orientation file was effective in helping familiarize users with system
• New Shortcuts made navigation simple
• Read Aloud tool used a clear voice and changing speeds wasn’t difficult
Beta Test
Measured Progress ©2011
• On the orientation: “I don’t think it was too much. Nice having list at end with all the commands. The orientation was good to help understand it.”
• On answer input: “(Answering was) Not difficult at all. It was nice, just being able to put in an answer.”
• On the read aloud quality and its value: “I liked the voice, it compares well to (MAC) voice over. I would use just the speech (on a test) because I can’t read as fast as that with braille.”
• On the overall system: “Its set up really well. I wouldn’t change much.”
• “Its set up really well. I wouldn’t change much.”
Beta Test II