32
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Lab Spring 2012 Dave Bayless, PhD, PE, FASME Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering 248 Stocker Center e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: M,T,W,Th 15:30 – 16:30

ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Lab Spring 2012

  • Upload
    urvi

  • View
    22

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Lab Spring 2012. Dave Bayless, PhD, PE, FASME Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering 248 Stocker Center e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: M,T,W,Th 15:30 – 16:30. Text. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Lab

Spring 2012

Dave Bayless, PhD, PE, FASMELoehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering

248 Stocker Centere-mail: [email protected]

Office Hours: M,T,W,Th 15:30 – 16:30

Page 2: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Text• ME 388 Laboratory Manual can be found at

http://www.ohio.edu/people/bayless/seniorlab

• Experimental Methods for Engineers (Holman) may be useful, but is not required

Page 3: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

GradingSubject Unit Weight Total

Five Experimental Lab Exercises @ 10% 50%

Mastery level formal report @ 25% 25%

CIM laboratory Project @  5% 5%

DOE Project @   5% 5%

Formal Lab Introductory material @  5% 5%

Final Exam @ 10% 10%

Total   100%

Page 4: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Purpose

• Enhance fundamental engineering learning with lab experiments

• Gain experience and improve experimental techniques

• Improve data reduction and analysis skills• Improve written communication skills

Page 5: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Outcomes

• Mastery• Competence• Awareness

Page 6: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Course Mastery Outcomes• Ability to perform curve-fitting of multivariate

data sets• Ability to calculate the error/uncertainty

propagation for calculations that include multiple terms with uncertainties.

• Writing and editing clear and effective laboratory reports, including the creation of “professional quality” graphics for figures, tables, plots and charts.

Page 7: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Course Competence Outcomes• Ability to use common measurement equipment• Ability to apply previously-learned engineering

concepts to compare theoretical predictions with actual experimental results in diverse, practical mechanical engineering experiments.

• Ability to program and use CNC machines to manufacture simple parts

• An ability to interpret tensile test data

Page 8: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Course Awareness Outcome

• Awareness of Design of Experiments (DOE) statistical techniques

• DOE Exercise will give you a chance to interpret a test matrix

Page 9: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Spelling and Grammar

• Write in the 3rd person• Use spelling and grammar checker in Word• Adopt the style of a textbook or journal article• See formal report guidelines in lab notes• “Write smart”

– “Outlying data were rejected.” instead of “Bad data was thrown out.”

– Edit your work to be concise!!

Page 10: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Figure 1. Burst strength as a function of time

Figure Example

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 100 200 300 400 500

Date of Sampling

Mul

len

Bur

st S

treng

th (p

si)

Teflon - Reactive 275Ryton B - Reactive 430Ryton-Sulfuric 605Omnisil-Sulfuric 550

Page 11: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Table 4. Dependent process variables as a function of the DOE number.

DOE No.

Dependent variablesRam pressure

(MPa)Specific pressure

(MPa)

1 14.71 459.22 15.09 471.1

3 14.30 446.64 13.69 427.35 14.77 461.16 14.37 448.37 13.30 415.0

Table Example

Page 12: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

vt

wt

1

3p iip

Figure 5: Schematic of stressed multi-void tube due to pressure

Use computer generated schematics

Page 13: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Equations

• Use MS Word Equation editor• Number equations sequentially, right justified• See Lab notes

Page 14: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Statistical Analysis Review

• Mean

• Standard Deviation

• Sample Size

Page 15: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

n

in x

nnxxxxx

1

321 1...

Mean

Page 16: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Standard Deviation

xxi Simple variance

ni

i xxnn

xxxxxxxx

1

222

32

22

121

11

...

Sample variance

2

1

1

222

32

22

11

11

...

n

ii xx

nnxxxxxxxx

Standard deviation of a sample

Page 17: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Histogram and normal distribution

Page 18: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Standard deviation and data

Page 19: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

How many samples are enough?

n xi xave 1 90 --- ---2 89 89.50 0.7073 91 90.00 1.0004 87 89.25 1.7085 80 87.40 4.3936 90 87.83 4.0707 92 88.43 4.036

Page 20: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Can “outlying” data be ignored?

• Determine if there is a physical basis for the suspect data (i.e., the TC broke, etc.)

• Chauvenet’s criteria for data rejection

Page 21: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Chauvenet’s criteria

1. Calculate xave and for data set2. Get dmax/ for the specific sample size from a

table3. Calculate dmax = (dmax/) × 4. Determine if the most “reject-able” data is

larger than this value, d = |xave – xi|5. Reject outlying data and then recalculate xave

and for data set

Page 22: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Chauvenet’s Example

Page 23: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Chauvenet’s Example4 (5 data points, n=5)23 Average = 6.2175 Standard Deviation = 6.14

Which one to reject? Technically, examine at them all Realistically, focus on “17”

For n = 5, reject at

65.1dmax

76.114.6

2.617d

← REJECT 17

Page 24: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

How sure are you of your data?• All measurement instruments have a degree of

uncertainty when taking a reading• Uncertainty values for a particular instrument

is usually given or can be determined• For calculated parameters, the uncertainty is a

function of the uncertainties of the measured parameters.

Page 25: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Uncertainty calculation

• Report uncertainty as a % of calculated value

21

222

),,(Let

zxW

yxW

vxWW

zyvfx

zyvx

%100X

WyintUncerta x

Page 26: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Regression Analysis• Pertains to reporting of a “least-square” or

other type of curve fit to your data

• You must report the equation and the correlation coefficient (R) or the coefficient of determination (R2)

• R-values should be presented with the equation and a graph of the data

Page 27: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Formal Report

• Abstract• Introduction• Experimental Apparatus• Results and Discussion• Conclusions and Recommendations• Appendices

– Uncertainty analysis– Data

Page 28: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Abstract (250 words)

• Purpose• What was done?• Significant parameters measured or set• Measurement results (summarized)• Quantitative comparisons (i.e., to published

values)

Page 29: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Introduction

• Provide background information• Establish significance of work• Introduce work and motivation for experiment• Introduce equations that are pertinent to data

analysis and purpose of the lab

Page 30: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Experimental Apparatus

• Describe experimental equipment configuration using schematic diagrams

• Explain test procedure• Present any calibration data• Show (tabulate) all uncertainty values

measurements that were taken

Page 31: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Results and Discussion

• Present results (analyzed data) in graphical form

• Discuss results and sources of error (explain why the data did what it did)

• Develop logical and reasonable explanations with regard to data behavior

• Make quantitative comparisons• Discuss uncertainty and if it accounts for any

known or obvious discrepancies

Page 32: ME 388 – Applied  Instrumentation  Lab Spring  2012

Conclusions and Recommendations

• Summarize results quantitatively• Summarize any comparisons• Start with results of most importance or

significance• Address all significant points• Make sound recommendations

– Things that could be improved– Additional work that could be done