9
MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development

Agenda

M&E Sector Working Group

May 2011

Page 2: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

Context: Growing importance of M&E

• The GoG is demonstrating a growing awareness of the necessity, and subsequent benefits, of having a strong functioning monitoring and evaluation system, including the collection and provision of relevant and robust statistics. – Ghana a middle income country– Discovery of oil– Call to demonstrate results

Page 3: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

What’s good?

• Greater recognition on the need to strengthen M&E and statistics in Ghana

• Development of costed M&E plans• Commitment from MDAs/MMDAs• NDPC support to development M&E plans

(technical advice, convening groups)• NDPC process to develop core indicators• On-going reforms for GSS, and the

development of the long survey calendar

Page 4: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

But….• Too many indicators proposed for APR, and

data on some of the indicators not readily available (some not part of M&E plans)

• Inadequate attention to cross-cutting issues (e.g. gender, environment)

• Resources to implement M&E plans• Weak capacity for M&E (skills, people,

resources, prioritisation)• Poor intra-ministry engagement in developing

plans (leadership, capacity, incentives)• Minimum attention to M&E results in planning

and decision-making

Page 5: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

Implications• APR/ GSGDA

– Too many indicators, some not part of sector M&E plans – difficulty in reporting progress

– Data gaps• Employment, productivity, social protection, natural

resources

– Data quality and credibility

• Evidence based policy making and performance based budgeting

• Prioritization of M&E/ statistics

• Accountability (Government, citizens)

Page 6: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

Way forward….• Include triggers for M&E/ statistics for 2011/12

– Funding (released & spent not just allocated)– Availing additional funds will strengthen M&E

and APR process

• M&E integral part of annual MDBS reviews (i.e cross cutting discussion)

• More engagement b/t M&E SWG and other Sector WGs

• Improved DP support to strengthening national M&E/ statistics through all programmes

• Joint Agenda to Strengthen M&E and Statistics (JASMES)

Page 7: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

Amount as % of the budget

• In 2009, total amount allocated to M&E and Statistics was GH¢17.2 million -- approximately 0.27% of the total budget for the MDAs

• In 2010, amount allocated to M&E and Statistics was GH¢101.3 million which represents approximately 2% of the total MDAs budget

• The reported higher amount for 2010 is attributed to the Population and Housing census conducted by the GSS

Page 8: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

M&E and Statistics - 2009

Page 9: MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011

M&E and Statistics - 2010

On average, of resources allocated:- for M&E less than 50% are released and spent;- for statistics less than 10% are released & spent.