Upload
elijah-baker
View
221
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MCS E-learning Development Overview
Presented by
Brajesh UpadhyayJordan BerkowTerri Sanborn
Points We’ll Cover
MCS Workflow Types of Lesson Players Prioritization LMS vs. Hosted Lessons Instructional Design Multimedia Development & Technology;
QA Web Development & ID/templates; QA Planning 2008 Enhancements
MCS Workflow
ProductOwners
Development LMS
E-learning planning & scoping
Source content
Peer review
Editing
Copyediting/proofing
CD duplication/inserts & marketing materials
ClientServices
Instructional design (formatting only)
Web development (internal only)
Media production
Assembly & QA
Online reviews
Revisions & updates
Custom work & demos
Maintain source files & templates; back-end
Lesson database mgmt.
MCS online catalog
Library cards
Certificates
Evaluations
User management
Build releases
‘Skills’ & non-content activities
MCS Change Control Committee
Learner support
Client support
MCS E-learning Development
Brajesh(Director)
LearningMate (production related)DHD Entertainment (video & audio)
Contract media developers (Flash media)
Jordan(Multimedia &Technology)
Terri(Web
Development)
Staff of 3 Vendors Contractors Staff of 3Instructional
Design
(formatting only)
Types of Lesson Players(a.k.a. “interface” or “skin”)
1. KDS I – Old style MCS lessons (open browser) (content model 1)
2. KDS II – New style lessons (closed browser) (content model 2)a. Limited Service - SME uses simple SME Guidelines; core templatesb. Full Service - Trained ID must be involved; all templatesBoth can use all our Flash exercise templates (6-8 new in 2008)Two new lesson players coming in 2008 (1 open; 1 closed)
3. Hosted or hybrid (content model 3)(a.k.a. “linked” or “third party”)
_________________________________________________________________
Non-Web friendly or built via authoring tools Conversion issues w/non-Web types (Director, Authorware, ToolBook) Should avoid authoring tool generated (Lectora, Trainersoft)
How We Prioritize
1. Scoped internal project work2. Scoped custom client work3. Change requests for LMS lessons4. Change requests for hosted lessons (SBN CE, ENA ENO, etc.)5. Courseware features/functionality enhancements6. Out-of-scope project work (including custom screens &
media)7. Special requests for product owners (demos, one-offs, etc.)8. Special requests for clients (unless paid for)9. Special requests for MNS (L. Zacks), MNC/MNI (L. Pilla) or
others
Elsevier ‘Multimedia Task Force’
John Wheeler (book ancillaries), Jim Twickler (Evolve) and Brajesh Upadhyay (MCS and MNS)
Global Elsevier supplier consolidation Cost control for commodities Standardization
‘Preferred Vendor’ status Elsevier Chennai (India) office
Pros/cons of LMS vs. Hosted Lessons
LMS Integrated
- Smoother functionality; fewer bugs- MCS owns the back-end- Efficient (ASP/database; load-once
elements & centralized media)- Benefits from LMS build releases (all
parties get same features/functions)- Easier to make change requests; no
external cost for most
- Not portable (better copy prevention)- Must rely on Kevin for most
enhancements (takes longer)(but no external cost)
Hosted
- More customizable (design & functionality)
- Portable(but no copy protection)
- Integrates into any LMS w/SCORM(but not always smoothly)
- Quicker development of features/functions
- Total filesize generally larger; less efficient
- SCORM issues- Vendor owns the back-end; proprietary
authoring system is used- Changes/updates take longer & cost
money- Version control issues- Possible backward compatibility issues
later
Importance of Instructional Design (ID)
Develops blueprint for web development, media production & assembly (storyboard)
50% content manipulation; 50% technical/formatting Content manipulation
Ensures all the learning objectives are addressed in the content, exercises, and post-test
Infuses innovative, engaging, and interactive learning (fully aware of development parameters and customization capabilities)
Organizes the content topics and exercises in a logical manner for online learning (may change content; rewrite)
Ensures the content and corresponding media clearly support the content topics
Validates the content is clearly and concisely written for the online medium
Designs, creates, or reviews exercises and the post-test to successfully check the learner’s knowledge of actual presented content
Importance of Instructional Design (ID)
(contd.)
Technical/formatting Full knowledge of screen/media templates (storyboard tool)
and development capabilities Cannot design in a vacuum; dictated by delivery format Consequences of non-compliant SBs to scope
Internal resources (time) External vendor/contractors (time & cost)
Multimedia DevelopmentJordan Berkow
StakeholdersStandards
Content Vs. LMS ChangesIT Development
2007 Accomplishments
Standards
Media Standards Templates Current Trends Storage
Back up, source files
Exercise Standards Templates Version control
Content Dev. vs. LMS/Platform
Lesson Info Page Library Card Lesson Screens Screen QARs Test Questions
Choices Answers Rationales
Lesson Assignment Pages
Test Instruction Page
Test question layout Format pages load Evaluations Certificates
Potential User-end issues
Items outside our control User’s Browser Monitor size Resolution/aspect ratio ISP Connection speed
IT Development/Applications
Reliant on IT/Apps for certain enhancements
Handle all platform issues Work with Skills, etc. Posts Linked Content to server
Back-end vs. Front-end
LMS Database HTML Flash - Action
Script
Lesson Screens Screen Text Images Exercises
Support of Hosted Content
Approx. 40 SBN CE Lesson revisions to date
Minor changes in ReadyRN, ENA, Periop & Neonatal
Receive Change Doc Evaluate internal vs. LM Make changes Evaluate on internal site Alpha Review IT Dev. Update Live site Beta Review
2007 Accomplishments
1806 LMS Lessons 1067 – Segment Owned
(Nursing, Coding, CDS, USA Prepare)
739 – Customer Owned (primarily Joint Commission customized work)
AHM – 18 Buck – 94 AHA Coding Clinic – 24 CME Doc – 11 Faye Brown 8 – 35 HFMA – 552 Jems Prepare – 140 Joint Commission – 15 eBDLS – 10 EMT Basic - 35
2007 change requests (total): 15,735
Current 2008 Accomplishments
397 LMS Lessons 78 – Segment Owned 319 – Customer Owned
Buck – 27 Joint Commission – 12 Spanish JC – 5 ENA Triage – 8 2008 CPT Changes – 6 Wound Management
Tests - 10
2008 change requests (to date): 3,806
Web Development Dept.
Role in Production & AssemblyTerri Sanborn
3 Types of Development Tasks
Projects Change Requests Custom Lessons
Projects
Scoped and scheduled Take priority Assigned to a lead person – others
may help as permitted in their schedule
Workflow in Projects
Word document/storyboard Create block name info (lesson id) Create screens and test questions Copy screen/test information from SB Tag screens for layout and functionality Lesson added in SQL Posted and added to module Reviewed/QA’d Sent to product owner/client
Block Name
Block Name Information
Screens and Test
Once the block name is created its time to add the screens and/or test screens
Standard naming convention for the screen and test numbers
Screen or Test
Screens
Test
Tagging Elements
Once the information is copied to the screen it is then tagged with HTML code for functional and visual output
Time spent on a screen is determined by the type of elements the screen has Subscreens PDFs Tables
Sample codingfor a ‘Did You Know’ note
Sample codingfor embedding an interactive media
Sample codingfor a simple table
Sample codingfor a text-top/icons-bottom screen
Change Requests
Updates to lessons already created Each team member is assigned a
group of states and projects Checked daily Notification with 72 hours of when
change(s) can be completed
Web Editor
How We Get Change Requests
Types of Custom Lessons
Customers unique lesson material Joint Commission for repurposing
Custom Client Lessons are assigned to staff when there is an open slot in the development schedule
*custom development work is 2nd priority to segment owned work
Enhancements for 2008: Web Development
Pre/post-test enhancement for learners Support for multi-select choices (checkboxes) Support for an optional final only feedback to questions Addition of media icon next to any question (embedded or opens new
window) Removal of unnecessary 'go to question n' anchor links Graphical banner
Mouse-over glossary pop-up boxes Via JavaScript layers, as in old lesson types) Not manually created, rather pulled dynamically from the same Glossary list
Enhancements for 2008: Multimedia
Two new lesson players (interfaces/skins), so we have 4 total to offer (1) open size any screen resolution higher than 800x600
One would have a drop-down menu design to reduce button clutter (1) fixed for 800x600 screen resolution Both would employ a curvy and/or retro look (more polished) Both would use same color scheme to match current players/exercises
New set of Flash exercise templates/engines Between 6-8 new types A branching case study Image map
Global/common enhancements to existing Flash exercise templates/engines
Addition of a pop-up layer for longer feedback in applicable exercises (as in old ENA lessons)
Up to 2-screen exercises, for those applicable (as opposed to creating separate 2-part exercises)