McKinleyResortMasterPlan July2012 LR

7/30/2019 McKinleyResortMasterPlan July2012 LR

1/44

Kw, B h Cumb

Version 4.0: Ju 2012

Village Master Plan

M C K i n l e y r e s o r t d e V e l o P M e n t


2/44

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t d e v e l o p m e n t kelowna, british columbiaV i l l a g e M a s t e r P l a n201 2 P cmk C ic. , V 4 .0: Ju 2 012

table of conte

Contents1.0 overview IntroDuCtIon .........................................................................................................................

overall masterplan ...........................................................................................................

exIstIng ConDItIons ............................................................................................................

2.0 village plan IntroDuCtIon .........................................................................................................................

vIllage thoroughfare network ....................................................................................

vIllage greenspaCe network .........................................................................................

hIlltown vIllage, hIlltop vIllage, teChnology .................... ........... .......... ........... ...

vIllage CommerCIal plan ...................................................................................................

perspeCtIve: hIlltown vIllage ........................................................................................

perspeCtIve: hIlltop vIllage ...........................................................................................

wInery vIllage ......................................................................................................................

perspeCtIve: wInery vIllage ...........................................................................................

marIna vIllage & hIllsIDe bungalows ...........................................................................

perspeCtIve: marIna vIllage............................................................................................

3.0 village design code IntroDuCtIon .........................................................................................................................

DesIgn revIew proCess ......................................................................................................

ZonIng summary ....................................................................................................................

the vIllage transeCt .........................................................................................................

the regulatIng plan ...........................................................................................................

buIlDIng ConfIguratIon ......................................................................................................

buIlDIng heIght ......................................................................................................................

buIlDIng types .......................................................................................................................

prIvate frontage types .....................................................................................................

parkIng.....................................................................................................................................

thoroughfare DesIgn ........................................................................................................

thoroughfare DesIgn ........................................................................................................

lanDsCape DesIgn .................................................................................................................




sustaInabIlIty stanDarDs ..................................................................................................

4.0 village architecture IntroDuCtIon .........................................................................................................................

vIllage CharaCter summary ...........................................................................................

arChIteCtural stanDarDs .................................................................................................

preCeDent Images ................................................................................................................




3/44

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t d e v e l o p m e n t kelowna, british columbiaV i l l a g e M a s t e r P l a n2012 Pcmk C ic. , V 4.0: Ju 2012 1 .0 O ver v

introduct

1.0 overview

discussion

In 2005 the G Group of Companies received zoning ap-

proval from the City of Kelowna, B.C. for Vintage Land-

ing, referred here as the McKinley Resort. The subject

property covers 202 acres located within the 869-acre

McKinley area property. The site is l ocated on the north-

ern boundary of the City of Kelowna and is character-

ized by steep, undulating slopes, granite outcroppings,

coniferous forests and upland meadows. The overallproperty plans to include:

202 c Hh W V

190 c 18 h cu

600 wk w wh 40 c v

Fuu MxU hbuh c wh ubv h m h pp

2530 km m

1 km k wh 123 p m

This document describes the design vision for the 202

acre Health and Wellness Village, and includes compre-

hensive design guidelines to guide implementation.

vision synopsis

Originally envisioned as simply a Health & Wellness

Resort, the plan has grown in complexity, opportunity,and vision. The core vision is to create a comprehen-

sive sustainable resort development that preserves sig-

nicant natural spaces through the creation of compact,

mixed-use, walkable neighbourhoods. The design of the

village area is guided by progressive urban design and

town planning techniques as pioneered by the Congress

for the New Urbanism, and propelled by the Sustain-

able Urbanism movement. Design principals are recog-

nized through various LEED programs, particularly the

new pilot LEED for Neighbourhood Development that

recognizes the sustainability of sustainable neighbour-

hood design, high performance infrastructure, and high

performance building systems.

The Master Plan is centered by a compact mixed use

village inspired by European Hilltown urbanism. This

core village represents a dynamic health and wellness

resort village including accommodation units, a street-

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t

d e v e l o p m e n t

McKinley area ProPerTy

oriented retail shopping and entertainment environment,

and various wellness-related medical commercial. In-

tegrated with the village is a technology village com-

ponent that relieves Kelownas signicant demand for

its growing technology sector through the creation of a

dynamic mixed use environment that exemplies the in -

dustrys desire for new economy towns and the cre-

ative class that demands mixed uses, diverse public

spaces, and a high quality of life. Downhill from the Hill-

town Village are hillside bungalows integrated into the

natural landscape, a Winery Village set on the edge of

a working vineyard, and a marina and Marina Village in-

spired by much-loved European waterfront villages. All

these components are integrated into a unied village

plan the exemplies sustainable settlement patterns.

the village master plan

This document describes the vision for the McKinley Re-

sort - a 202 acre area encompassed by the approved

CD-18 Vintage Landing Comprehensive Resort Devel-

opment zoning. This document is organized into the fol-

lowing sections:

1.0 ovvw: cb h pjc bcku

2.0 V P: cb h v phc

3.0 V d C: pv u

mpm h v

4.0 V achcu: pv pcp v u chcu xp.

changes to this document and plan

This document represents a principle and intention-

driven design vision for the Village. In order to accom-

modate new opportunities, ensure market exibility, and

respond to detail design on difcult sloped sites, the

plan will necessarily change and evolve. This vision

represents the intentions and current physical manifes-

tation of the village. The vision and intention will be the

responsibility of the Master Developer to uphold.


4/44


iuv

overall masterpl

scale: 1 to 1

F u t u r e


F u t u r e


F u t u r e


F u t u r e


glenmore road

M c k i n l e y

r e s e r v o i r

F u t u r e


F u t u r e


F u t u r e


G o l f C o u r s e

V i n e ya r d

O k a n a g a n

l a k e

m c k i n l e y

r e s o r t


Mc

Ki

nl

ey

Road

Sla

terRo

ad


5/44


existing conditio

SlaterRoad

GlenmoreRoadN.

FutureShaylerRoad

FinchRoad

McK

inle

yRoad

Okanagan Lake

10% - 20% s

20% - 30% s

30% - 40% s

40% - 100% s

mcki r bd

mcki a p bd

vi Zi bdi

0% - 10% s

legend

scale: 1 to 1


6/44

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t d e v e l o p m e n t kelowna, british columbiaV i l l a g e M a s t e r P l a n2012 Pcmk C ic. , V 4.0: Ju 2012 2 .0 Vi l l a g e P

introduct

2.0 village Plan

overview

Originally envisioned as simply a Health & Wellness

Resort, the plan has grown in complexity, opportunity,

and vision. The core vision is to create a comprehen-

sive sustainable resort development that preserves sig-

nicant natural spaces through the creation of compact,

mixed-use, walkable settlements. The design of the vil-

lage area is guided by progressive urban design and

town planning techniques as pioneered by the Congressfor the New Urbanism, and propelled by the Sustainable

Urbanism movement. Design principals are recognized

through various LEED programs, particularly the new

pilot LEED for Neighbourhood Development that rec-

ognizes the sustainability of walkable neighbourhood

design, high performance infrastructure, and high per-

formance building systems.

overall village

The Village Master Plan is a collection of several smaller

villages linked together by a walkable transportation

network and set within a largely preserved natural land-

scape. Each village has a dened boundary and a clear

centre dened by a central public space. Walkability is

granted by humanly-scaled streetscapes, a porous, in-

terconnected network of walkable streets and pathways,

and the proximity of multiple land uses. The HillsideVillage is the core village for the entire Village Master

Plan, serving an important civic function for the entire

resort community.

The hillTown Village

At the centre of the Village Master Plan is the Hilltown

Village. This village is inspired by organic European

Hilltown urbanism including a dening village wall

around the perimeter of the village. The Central Square

forms the centre of the hillside village, and subsequently

of the entire Village, and includes resort accommoda-

tions, shopping, dining, recreation, and a multi-func-

tional plaza overlooking Okanagan Lake. This centre is

activated by the most intense development on the site,

a gondola terminal links it to the Marina Village, it is suit-

able for a signicant regional transit hub. The Hilltown

Village also includes commercial ofce, medical ofce,various resort accommodations including direct street-

access units, various public spaces and streetscapes,

links to surrounding pathways, views onto the pond and

the lake, a potential conference centre, civic buildings

such as community halls and churches, a multi-purpose

sports eld, two amphitheaters, a centrally located rec-

reation centre, various spa locations, and a gondola ter-

minal. All buildings are street-oriented to create a rich

network of urban public spaces.

Technology Village

Forming the southern gateway to the Hilltown Village,

the Technology Village (Okanagan Technology Innova-

tion Centre) will host a 500,000 sf cluster of LEED stan-

dard high-tech research and product design facilities in

addition to ofce, support/incubation retail and accom -

modation units- all set within a human scaled, mixed-

use village.

The hillTop Village

Rising above the Hilltown is a small outcropping of ac-

commodation units anchored by a modest lookout tower.

The Hilltop Village creates a picturesque settlement on

the hill.

The winery Village

Adjacent to a vineyard and winery operation north of the

site, a Winery Village creates an active interface and

gateway to the winery itself. Units include quaint street-accessible accommodations and the potential for both

a signicant hotel and a spa r etreat.

The hillside Bungalows

Hillside bungalows dene the hillside between the lake

and the Hillside Village. These custom buildings are in-

tegrated into the natural forest landscape and are de-

signed to have a low-impact on the surrounding land-

scape. Two larger hotel sites are also included.

The Marina Village

At the Okanagan Lake Interface, a marina integrates

with a Marina Village. The marina includes boat slips, a

boat launch, a possible swimming pool, and a potential

dock side restaurant. The village is anchored by a multi-

level square and includes a large parkade built into the

hillside, lined by retail and accommodation units, and

tied to a gondola terminal.

Hillside Bungalows

winery

winery Village HillTown Village

Marina Village

Marina

TecHnology Village

HillTo

Villag

sc: 1


7/44


village thoroughfare netwo

mj mici rd

legend

p

lc rd

sc: 1


8/44


village greenspace netwo

Ccd gc

legend

Id n ldcsc: 1


9/44


si bi i hiid

od rci bidi Technology Ofce

Technology Ofce

Technology Ofce

li/w i r

Mixed Use/Ofce

C/Cc

Ciic bidi

hi vi l

gd ti

rci C

ti i ii

d i jc c

n ai

tc

(o tc

Ii C)

h

h

h

h

g t

ai

Ici li/w

Ici li/w

u l sq

*t li c

li/w

d

ccdi

CD-18 Zi.

f tc

oi vi pi

mi-u s fid

fid h

ecd n pd d p

hic pd lci

g bidi

bid

f a i

pcd t**

pi C-

c C/h

Ciic mi h

l & tid

si bid

vid d/ n-

f p

vi fi

hiid accdi

ui

hiid accdi

ui

** pcd d i

i c c , d d did c.

vi w (t.)

ri C & p

hilltown village, hilltop village, technology villa

sc: 1 3000

iuv


10/44


hilltown village commercial pldcpv

FB

FB

FB

FB

Retail Shopfronts

Technology Village

(o tc Ii C)

Mixed Use - Minor Retail

Pedestrian Friendly Commercial/

Ofce Frontages/ Flex-Retail

ri a : . 5688 2 (61,234)

t a Cci: 56,000 2 (602,779 )

legend

sc: 1


11/44


Vw m n

perspective: hilltown villa

ai Cci


12/44

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t d e v e l o p m e n t kelowna, british columbiaV i l l a g e M a s t e r P l a n2012 Pcmk C ic. , V 4.0: Ju 2012 2 .0 Vi l l a g e Pl

Vw lw

perspective: technology villa

ai Cci


13/44


Vw

perspective: hilltop villa

ai Cci


14/44


iuv

winery villa

eci h

h Cd s pic sc

s-oid r

accdi

accdi

pi s

si bid

Cd b

Id vid

b

wi (t Did)

vid

sc: 1 3000 * ti i i

d i jc c


15/44


Vw suh w h Hw

perspective: winery villa

ai Cci


16/44


iuv

marina village & hillside bungalo

pic g

hiid b (

gd row & p

gd ti

Icic t e

pz-td

bid

mi-l pz

h

bd p

pd lid i

d accdi

h

g si

b lc

pic g

wi-i- p

Dc si

sc: 1 3000* ti i i

d i jc c


17/44


Vw

perspective: marina villa

ai Cci o


18/44

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t d e v e l o p m e n t kelowna, british columbiaV i l l a g e M a s t e r P l a n2012 Pcmk C ic. , V 4.0: Ju 2012 3 .0 Vi l l a g e D es i g n C o

introduct

3.0 village Design CoDe

discussion

The Village Design Code establishes design parameters

and specications beyond that of the underlying zoning

to establish a specic outcome and character for the vil-

lage. The Code is administered largely by a committee

formed by the master developer and is enforced through

a development agreement as property is sold or leased.

The Code also serves as a reference for municipal ap-

provals and regulation of the property.

Although prescriptive, the Village Design Code is an in-

tention-based code. The intention is conveyed as broad

principles on this page, as well as, through the descrip-

tive text and graphics deployed throughout the Village

Master Plan document. It is intended to allow some de-

sign exibility, and more importantly, to evolve over time.

The Plan and Code are expected to change during the

detailed design process, which is particularly important

for complex mixed-use projects and sites with difcult

grades. However, all changes are to be in-line with the

base intent of this Plan and Code.

process

Upon securing a property with the Master Developer, a

development agreement will require new land-owners

and/or lessees to enter into a design review process-

administered by a Design Review Committee (DRC).

The DRC is established by the Master Developer. This

process is explained in the subsequent pages of this

Code. It is expected that the review process associated

with this Code be administered in parallel with required

municipal approvals. It is the responsibility of the Land-

Owner and/or lessee to secure necessary municipal ap-

provals.

limitations

This Plan and Code are administered by the Master De-

veloper who reserves the right to change, update, and

expand the Plan and Code as is consistent with the intent

set forth in this document. This Code is not intended to

supersede any municipal regulations or processes, and

may be used by the Municipality as a reference for their

review process.

intent

The intent and purpose of t his Plan and Subsequent De-

sign Code is to enable, encourage and qualify the imple-

mentation of the following principles [policies]:

the region

a. That the region should retain its natural infrastructure and

visual character derived from topography, woodlands, farm-

lands, riparian corridors and shorelines.

b. That growth strategies should encourage Inll and redevel-opment.

c. That development contiguous to urban areas should be

structured as complete, compact, walkable neighbourhoods

(Traditional Neighbourhood Developments - TND) and be in-

tegrated with the existing urban pattern.

d. That development non-contiguous to urban areas should

be organized in the pattern of Clustered Land Development

(CLD), Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), or Re-

gional Centre Development (RCD).

e. That transportation corridors should be planned and re-

served in coordination with land use.

f. That green corridors should be used to dene and connect

the urbanized areas.

g. That the region should include a framework of transit, pe-

destrian, and bicycle systems that provide alternatives to the

automobile.

the community

a. That TNDs, Inll TNDs and Regional Centres should be

compact, pedestrian-oriented and mixed use.

b. That TNDs, Inll TNDs and Regional Centres should be the

preferred pattern of development and that districts specializing

in a single use should be the exception.

c. That ordinary activities of daily living should occur within

walking distance of most dwellings, allowing independence to

those who do not drive.

d. That interconnected networks of thoroughfares should be

designed to disperse and reduce the length of automobile

trips.

e. That within neighborhoods, a range of housing (including

accommodation) types and price levels should be provided to

accommodate diverse ages and incomes.

f. That appropriate building densities and land uses should be

provided within walking distance of transit stops.

g. That civic, institutional, and commercial activity should be

embedded in town centres, not isolated in remote single-use

complexes.

h. That a range of open space including parks, squares, and

playgrounds should be distributed within neighborhoods and

town centres.

the block and the building

a. That buildings and landscaping should contribute to thephysical denition of thoroughfares as civic places.

b. That development should adequately accommodate auto-

mobiles while respecting the pedestrian and the spatial form

of public areas.

c. That the design of streets and buildings should reinforce

safe environments, but not at the expense of accessibility.

d. That architecture and landscape design should grow from

local climate, topography, historey, and building practice.

e. That buildings should provide their inhabitants with a clear

sense of geography and climate through energy efcient

methods.

f. That civic buildings and public gathering places should be

provided as locations that reinforce community identity and

support self-government.

g. That civic buildings should be distinctive and appropriate to

a role more important than the other buildings that constitutethe fabric of the city.

h. That the preservation and renewal of historic buildings

should be facilitated, to afrm the continuity and evolution of

society.

i. That the harmonious and orderly evolution of urban areas

should be secured through form-based codes.

the transect p 18

a. That communities should provide meaningful choices in liv-

ing arrangements as manifested by distinct physical environ-

ments.

b. That the Transect Zone descriptions shall constitute the in-

tent of this plan with regard to the general character of each of

these environments.

definitions

Th Mpt

The City of Kelowna.

Mt dvp

The title-holding land developer for the entirety of the M

ley Resort site, the Master Developer retains rights th

the execution of development agreements and other co

as subdivided property is sold or leased.

dvpmt rv cmmtt (drc)

A committee established by the Master Developer with

ntion of administering and implementation the Village Pla

Design Code.

Th V Mt P

The current version of this document in its entirety. A

ferred to as The Plan.

Th V d c

Chapter 3.0 (this chapter) of the Village Master Plan s

cally. Al so refereed to as The Code.

ct l dvpmt (cld)

A community type where development is clustered into

walkable settlements for the purpose of preserving sign

open space.

Tt nhbh dvpmt (Tnd)

The conception of the neighbourhood unit as a compacwasted space), complete (a mix of uses), and walkabl

nected network of pedestrian-oriented streets and pat

generally bound by a 5-minute walk (roughly 400m).

r ct dvpmt (rcd)

An intensied TND serving regional land uses and with

nicant transportation hub.

credits

The Village Master Plan is principally authored by P

maker Canada Inc, (Formerly T-Six Urbanists Inc

contributions from Coast Architectural Group, Sit

the Master Developer, and others.

This Village Design Code is based on an interpreta

the SmartCode V.9.0. The SmartCode and asso

graphics are Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co. More

mation can be found at www.smartcodecentral.co


19/44


design review proc

discussion

This Village Master Plan and review process is enforced

through the establishment of development agreements

and other contracts executed between the Master De-

veloper and purchasers/lessees of subdivided parcels.

The Master Developer will establish/appoint a Develop-

ment Review Committee (DRC) with the task of admin-

istering this design review process. The DRC may be

composed of a representative from the Master Devel-

oper, Design Consultants, Municipal representatives

and/or others as required.

fees

The Design Review fee exacted by this process is used

to pay for fees and disbursements generated by the

DRC, and a portion may be retained as a deposit for

sufcient completion of construction. Municipal fees

and fees associated with consultants engaged by the

owner/lessee are the sole responsibility of the owner/

lessee. The fee is based on expected expenses. Addi-

tional expenses above and beyond the normal expected

review process will be exacted before those expenses

are incurred. The fees will vary by the complexity of the

project and are established as part of the current DRC

Review Application form.

authority

This Plan and Code are administered by the Master De-

veloper who reserves the right to change, update, andexpand the Plan and Code as is consistent with the intent

set forth in this document. This Code is not intended to

supersede any municipal regulations or processes, and

may be used by the Municipality as a reference for their

review process. It is the responsibility of the Landowner

and/or lessee to secure necessary municipal approvals.

Where there is a discrepancy between this Village Mas-

ter Plan and municipal requirements as per the CD 18

zoning, and/or the executed Development Agreement,

the municipal requirements and/or executed Develop-

ment Agreement shall take precedence.

design review process

Step 1: Execute Development Agreement

u ci , D a c Di ri c.

t D a i i di, -cd dii q ccdi d c-

ci, d qi/i.

Step 2: Initiate the Design Review Process

a Di ri aici i id

a i cd, Di ri aici , c cid i Di ri p-

c d di i cic.

a c i .d d c-d ii i idd /

a ii i d i DrC d diic c dic vi m p, i

ci, iii c/cc, d ii ici-

qi.

Step 3: Schematic Design Submittal

t di c i o d

cic di i .

a iii cic di i d ii ci

di i DrC i i

did di .

t cic di i c icd d c,

CaD di, c d, cd , d i dd. a di d c. a ii-

, i d icd i ii

cic di:

a si p

pii f p

bidi d i ci

ei i idi cc/

Building Massing (note that computer masses do not suf -ci dci idi cc/)

lci esa

C, id, d dici DrC i idd ci d ddd i q di.

m c i qi d c d

i.

Step 4: Design Development Submittal

rdi c DrC cic dii, di c i

i di d.

a di d c id DrCd qi i. a i, DrC i -

c d i dcid i i

qid.

Upon acceptance of sufcient design development progress, a

ccc d i id o

to proceed with the nal design. This letter may be conditional.

aici ici D pi i cddat this time to allow changes to be integrated into the nal plan

i.

Step 5: Final Plan Submittal

u di ci, i i (3) c- ci bidi pi qi di

DrC.

The DRC will commence nal review.

Upon nal acceptance, a letter will be issued to the Owner andthe Municipality, endorsing the nal design and releasing the

qi ii D

a.

a c qd ici c i qiinput and acceptance from the DRC. If a conict arises, a meet-

i cd cd i i -

i.

Upon nal acceptance from the DRC, and necessary permits id icii, cci cc

ii ii D a-

.

Step 6: Construction and Site Review

pi cci, Cci s-u i i id icdi DrC, o, d

cci . ti i i c:

D ci, d cci , d -i i ci/ ,

miii i dic

p d cd/id.

Dici cc i i d cc-i.

pid cci i DrC i dc ii ccd d vi

m p.

t o i i cci i c-

dcd i cc d .

t o i i c ici iand certicates.

Step 7: Final Review

Upon sufcient construction completion, a letter of cons-cic i id.

Upon sufcient completion of site works and landscaping, cci -swl i id.

u i c idi c/ment, and prior to move-in, nal acceptance will be gra

i di i DrC

a.

Final Plan Submittal Checklist-Minimum Requirements

Ci i ci , d, idi i, d idi d

di d i i (ii/d), iii

i, cd i d d ii.

Cidi esa d iii .

Roof plan and oor plans showing all roof and wall attach ci, di, d i .

ei i id, idi d

d c idici i, id d d

and schedules, at the same scale as the oor plans.

sci i i minimum of two unless signicant slope conditions

. ldc icdi ci d iz ii posed vegetation, location and specication of all paving

specication and location of all walls and vertical landsc

, dci , iid,

dc ii.

Cci ii d i ci c, i , i, cci i,

ciii, d i ii/dii

.

Exterior lighting and signage including a xture schedule

Colour and material board clearly indicating materials sp i.

pci di di c i.

Cci cd icdi i d completion, nalization of landscaping, and anticipated

c d.


20/44


Zoning summa

cd-18 Zoning summary

The Village area currently has a CD-18 zoning. The zoning establishes

baseline by-right development parameters including principal and second-

ary uses, density allocations, and basic form parameters such as height and

setbacks.

The zoning is the basis for the Village Plan and Design Code. The design

code provides further guidance and restrictions to achieve specic form and

character. The following parameters are established by the CD-18 zone:

t d

Resort Accommodation: 187,500m2

Resort Accommodation Types:

Type A: 97,500m2 attached units

Type B: 90,000m2 detached/semi-detached(4 units or less)

Commercial: 65,000m2

Employee Accommodation: 19,000m2

a i: w v

Resort Accommodation: 63,750m2 (up to 11,250m2 Type B)

Commercial: 56,000m2

Building Height: 8.5 storeys, 38.25m

a ii: w r a


Commercial: 2,000m2


a iii: h r a

Resort Accommodation: 45,000m2 (allType B)

Commercial: 1,000m2


a iv: w r a


Commercial: 6,000m2


sc: 1


21/44


the village trans

the transect

Based on the study of ecology, the Transect has emerged

as a pragmatic means to understanding complex human

settlement patterns. The Transect is a continuum from

the most rural/natural to the most urban that when di-

vided into tiers, lends itself to zones that can be regu-

lated as distinct environments with specic character.

Where separate-use zoning has failed to adequately

regulate complex, ne-grained human environments,

the Transect organizes the parameters of all elements of

the built environment into appropriate context-sensitive

transect zones. Used in a regulatory code, the Transect

allows the intuitive regulation of the built environment

to achieve the exibility and complexity of organic hu -

man settlement, while envisioning a specic physical

outcome.

MoreNatural

MoreurbaN

TransecT

More Natural More urbaNTransecT

t5

t4

t3

t1

t2

the mckinle y resort transect

the transect generaliZed


22/44


the regulating pl

discussion

The Regulating Plan is a regulatory map that forms the basis for the Village

Design Code. The map oats above the underlying zoning, adding addi-

tional regulations to dene a specic form and character. The regulating plan

locates transect zones, civic spaces, and other form-related elements such

as retail frontages and important building terminations.

*This regulating plan is subject to change, renement, and updating as di-rected by the Master Developer and the DRC.

legend

t5

t4

t3

t1 T1/T2 nt/r Z

T3 V e Z

T4 V g Z

T5 V ct Z

cv sp

Outdoor public space designed as per the Civic Spaces specications accord -

ing to their Transect zone context.

cv B

A building operated by not-for-prot organizations dedicated to arts, culture,

education, recreation, government, transit, and municipal parking.

Tmt Vt

An important location at the axial viewshed of a thoroughfare. Building articula-

tion should respond architecturally through vertical elements and/or other fea-

tures in order to add waynding and character to the public realm.

Ft l

The line where front setbacks and allowable building frontages are applied.

rq shpft

In order to create cohesive, mutually supportive retail, required shopfront front-

ages ensure a critical mass of pedestrian-oriented retail. Hotel lobbies (grand

entries) and entries may be integrated within shopfront frontages.

rmm shpft

st T4

Blanketed T4 reserved for standalone accommodation and/or other uses.

Rather than streetscape, the emphasis is on views to and from the structure(s)

with surface parking shielded within treed areas. Sites are comprehensively

designed and should have a humanly scaled pedestrian/entry sequence.

*

*

*

*

*


23/44


building configurat

discussion

The underlying zoning allows considerable exibility for

building conguration and massing on the site. This sec-

tion provides parameters for building siting based on the

appropriate Transect context.

intent a h m u h tc, bu

c ch. M u bckw h u cp pm.

a h m ub h tc, bu pc ch h . ach bum cmpx ub bck h c h pubc pv pp. shw bckw bu hp cv pubcm.

MorenaTural

Moreurban

TransecT

t5t4t3 village edge village general village centre

th bck pm c ch /ck ucu hw bv.

th Pcp Bu h pm ccmmu.

th sc Bu p ubu pk, c , wkhp, m h hbb ucu m 41m2 .

sc Bu c pc whuc cc m h .

a pv, w cu m b cc hbu m xc 60 m2.

th bck pm c ch /ck ucu hw bv.

th Pcp Bu h Pm ccmmu.

th sc Bu p ubu pk, c , wkhp, m h hbb ucu m 41m2 .

sc Bu c pc whuc cc m h .

Bu c hu b h pcp.

F m cch pv huh w wh h huh .

th bck pm c hw b

F bck hu b b h : h pv v bu /wk c pc, k w/p bu h

. gu v cp w bck.

t5 bu pc c wh cmbck h cmb h c z pucu h .

t5 bu h p cmpuhu m h u wh p c uch phw, bu, uc cuh w.

Pk ucu hu pc b h

bc vw b h hbb pc.

Bu xc 6.5 qu h

mmum 60% xp pk ucu wb pc.

sc Bu ppcb.

Bu c hu b h p

.

s etbaC ks - prInC Ipal b lDg . s etba Cks - prInC Ipal blDg . setba Cks - prInC Ipa l blDg .

s etbaC ks - seCo nDa ry b lDg. s etba Cks - seC onD ary b lDg .

C l

Cdii

mid-bc

Cdii

f2.5 i.f0 i.,5.5.

f0i.,5.5. f0i.,2.0.

f0i.,2.0.

f0i.

f0 i.,5.5.

(f2.5i.)

f3.5 i.

sid6.0 i.

r

3.5

i.

r

3.5

i.

C l

Cdii

mid-bc

Cdii

6

sid1.0 i.sid0i.

f6i.

+pici

scf6 i.

+pici

sc

f- i.mcpici

r 1.0i

r 1.0ir 1.0i

r 1.0i

r 1.0i

r 1.0i

C l

Cdii

mid-bc

Cdii

sid0i.sid0i.

C l

Cdii

mid-bc

Cdii

3d

l

rea0m


24/44


building heig

discussion

Measuring and regulating building height on a sloped

site creates some difculty. While it should be reafrmed

that the underlying intention of this Plan and Code is to

create a walkable, compact, and highly attractive hillside

resort, this section provides additional guidance and a

rationale for calculating building height.

intent

a h m u h tc, bu pc . o p , hhh vw m v v. th qu hh b c m h wp h p.

a h m ub h tc, bu pc ch p cmpx bck. a

h bck v hmv bu, h h pubc ccb huh, hh hu bmu m h huh. thcu h c pubc

pc.

MorenaTural

Moreurban

TransecT

Viewed from afar, Italys much-loved Cinqua Terre hill towns reveal

numerous storeys. However, a human scale is communicated by

their intimate streets where actual building elevation rarely exceeds

3 storeys.

t5

t4t3 village edge village general

village centre measuring height in elevation

building height notes

1. Bu Hh wc hw hm.

2. s m xc 4.5m hh m h c, xcp C

c uc whch mu b mmum 3.5m wmxmum.

3. a v xc 4.5m, 7.5m v, h b cu 2 s. Mzz b 33% h h b cu

.

4. i pk ucu , ch v cu s hp hb.

5. Hh m pp c b

m, b, cck w, chm u, w v bukh.

CD-18 Section 1.3 (m) i:Height is measured midwayalong the Front Building Faade.

t. m. hi6 s

(m 6.5 s i a Iv)

t. m. hi 4 s(m 2.5 s i a III)

m 2.5 s i a III

mi. 2.0 sc rqidec vic t e

mi. 2.0 sc rqidec vic t e

si sc . 7.0d d.

m i cc /d, ,

d i.

t. mi. hi3 s

pd

t4 li (1)

Cd bc

hi i d i bidi fid f bidi fcd.

bidi cd id d dene a perimeter block. In this case, building h d c f bidi f

n, di cd cd.bidi diid cd i cic diici, i cc d i, - i idi c idiid cd.

ei t

ei t

o idi i d ic i d id cd idi, idi d cd ic ,

i d d d idi.

m hi8.5 s, 38.25 (a I)

rd ci ic - d ci ci

m hi6.5 s, 29.5. (c a III)

rd ci ic - d ci ci

m hi2.5 s, 11.5. dc

i.

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

12

11109876

54321

6

5

4

3

2

1

2

1


25/44


additional height diagra

cd-18 st 1.3 (m)

In the case of an urban perimeter block where multiple buildings are attached at the

sides and/or rear, multiple Front Building Faades at the perimeter shall express

separate buildings distinct in character and elevation. Each distinct elevation shall

be measured individually for building height.

cd-18 st 1.3 (m)

The Front Building Faade (Shown in Red) is the side of a building built along the

property line that abuts a public street or passageway, or a publicly accessible private

condominium street or passageway, and is intended as the main pedestrian egress

and ingress to the building.

While building masses are connected (as shown in the section view above), and

the entire block may be constructed at once, this urban perimeter block is com-

posed of numerous facades. Uphill facades are masked by lower ones from the

downslope view.

In the case of a perimeter block, each distinct facade is measured for height as

shown to the right (in red). Dashed arrows indicate measurement of height.

A perimeter block creates a number of Block Faces, as indicated, each with multiple

Front Facades (in red).

In the absence of a perimeter block, the rear facade is left exposed to downslope

view.

cd-18 st 1.3 (m) v

On a building that is not masked from public view on the downslope side by attached

buildings, or buildings separated by a courtyard or service alley, height shall be mea-

sured from the downslope faade of the building.

Although this is the Front Facade, the rear facade exposes additional stories at the

rear, and therefore must be measured on the downslope side, regardless of the loca-

tion of the public street or front facade.

Ft evt

st V

Bk F c

Bk F B

Bk F aBlock Face A

Public Street

Public Street

Public Street

PubliclyA

ccessible

Street/La

neBlock Face B

Block Face C

(Not Shown)

r evt

Height must be measured at the downslope side.


26/44


building ty

attached: freestanding hotel, unitswith shared entry (tyPe a)

commercial/office with shared entry

and shallow frontage

attached: combined shared entry anddirect enry units (tyPe a)

accommodation (residential character) commercial

compound block

mixed use/retail base

mixed use: retail base, grand ent

accommodations or office

attached: direct entry

(tyPe B iF less tHan 4 Units)detached: hillside bungalow

(tyPe B, May also MUltiPle Units-UP to 4)

Mixed Use, Retail Base, T5Direct Entry

Shared Court

Parkade

Mixed Direct and Shared

Entry Units, T4

Ofce, T5

t5

t5

t5

t5

t5

t5

t4

t4

t4

t4

t4

t4

t3 t3

The compound block is a com-

pact perimeter block where mul-

tiple buildings are joined at theperimeter and the rear. Each

building faces onto a private or

public thoroughfare at the front.

At the rear, buildings are joined

by shared courts and parkade

structures. These blocks typi-

cally form the ridgeline of the

Hilltown Village with T5 build-

ings on the up-slope, and T4

buildings ringing the remaining

block. In this way, the larger

buildings command views at

the top, while smaller buildings

shield parking and form pub-

lic space. Compound blocks

combine building and frontage

types.


27/44


private frontage ty

retail-shopfrontyard & deck stoop & terrace shallow entry

grand entry

shopfront

arcade

planter/kneewall

forward stoop

inset stoop

side stoop

dooryard

natural yard

t5

t5

t5

t5

t5

t5

t5t4

t4 t4

t4

t4

t4

t4

t4

t3

t3


28/44


park

discussion

The underlying McKinley Resort CD-18 zoning provides

basic parking and loading provisions. The Village is in-

tended to embody walkability, a unique resort character,

and sustainability. There are a number of ways to re-

duce the impact of car parking facilities. In more urban

transect zones, this may be easily handled by parkades

imbedded into compound blocks, and the careful use of

on-street parking. In less urban transect zones, it will

be more challenging as it is more more difcult to hide

individual garages while at the same time, lower density

areas make walking a less desirable alternative. This

page presents methods to reduce parking impact and

quantity.

reduced parking standards & shared parking

The two tables below provide a guideline to rst reduce

parking requirements, and then use multiplication fac-

tors to further reduce requirements through shared

parking facilities.

parking strategies: t4&t3

The use of alternative golf-cart scaled vehicle

strongly encouraged with off-site parking provided

where. These vehicles can be parked in Cart Ter

which are in effect open sided shelters that appe

a small at-grade terrace when not occupied, an

be integrated with the building entry. Terraces gen

have paver stone surfaces, with columns suppor

roof or pergola structure. The style matches the

pal residence. From most desirable, to least des

the following list describes possible parking strate

C tc/C g o, o C s

a/r l g

s l g

tm g, s l p wh

dub g, bck h m h h 3 , vu

tm g, s d F l

Not Allowed: Front loaded garages with double

doors.

parking location

t5

t4t3 v illage edge village general

village centre

parking guidelines

Parking demand may be reduced by the following:

a cc wk wkb huh

phw h cu wk

a pmb bck ucu h w mup, c

u p

Fqu bcc c uch ck bk ck

bk ck p 10 pk cmm.

i wh h Kw pcu c cvc pc h V c qu

icu pk jc u

awc pk hu vc

ap v vhc uch c cvhc

lm pk qu uc m.

Visual impact of parking facilities are reduced by:

lc pk bu cv .

ruc vw mmum 3.0m t3t4, 7.0m t5.

rpc C g wh C g tc.

U tm g

C u pmb pv.F ch u, c pv wh ck .

d pk /v m pz.

sh v m h pubc m wh bu m, h wh cv w, wh cp.

Phb ubwh xcp t5.

reDuCeD parkIng stanDarDs

T3 T4 T5

accdi 1.0 / i 1.0 / i 1.0 / i

Cci 2.0 / 100 m2 g fa 2 .0 / 1 00 m2 g fa 2 .0 / 10 0m2 gfa

Ciic tbD tbD tbD

shareD parkIng faCtor

fci i fci

accdi accdi

ri ri

Cci Cci

1.7

1.4

1.2

1.4

1.7

1

1

1

1.2

6.0

6.0

3.0. Di/tc

7.0. pdDi

3.0.Di/tc

pincialfontage

pincialfontage

scdf

scdf

2dl(6.0)

2dl(6.0)

2dl(6.0)

2d l,scdf(4.0)

r fcd

1l(fsc)

1l(fsc)

1l(fsc)

3dl(riiD)

3dl(riiD)

3dl(riiD)

pincialf

ontage

scdf

calculating shared parking s wh h cmmc u ccmm

u, m h qu pc v b h h c m cu qu pc.

s wh h vb pk, mup vb pc b

h c w u. Mup h b 50 m2 2.0/100m2gFa m wb cmmc/. subc 50 m2 ch

ccmm u.

1st Layer: C c , 2.5 d, 3.0 id; di

3.0 id

2nd Layer: o c c (icd di), si id id-d

d.

3rd Layer: g d c, (2) i id d, d cci ciii.

1st Layer: Di dicd, n pi a d

2nd Layer: 6.0m min. Habitable space for all fully exposed oors.

2nd Layer, Secondary Frontage: Min 4.0m habitable space at oor levelsat and above the ground oor level of the Principal Frontage at

c. eci d -d d- id idiid i. bidi 6.5 qi 60%

d d c idd i c. 7. 0

. d di d.

3rd Layer: pd i c.

Rear Facade: n qi i idd i c, i

2d l, scd f.

1st Layer: C c , 2.5 d, 3.0 id; di

3.0 id

2nd Layer: mi. 6.0 i c, 3.0 id d/

i /id i cc. n idiid i d c. C cidd idiid i.

3rd Layer: g d c, (2) i id

d, d cci ciii.


29/44


Mucp s

thoroughfare des

discussion

Thoroughfares include the full spectrum of transporta-

tion corridors from regional highways to narrow hillside

pathways. Village streets should be designed to reect

capacity and character. Streets should serve the move-

ment and safety of pedestrians rst. Minimum width

standards reduce speeds, reduce impervious surfaces,

and increase walkability.

The thoroughfare design shown here reect both sec-

tions designed around current municipal standards that

are intended to remain as public rights-of way, and cus-

tom thoroughfare designs that may be public, but aremore likely private. These custom streets are designed

for a specic character and to match the intentions of

the plan.

Thoroughfares should change character with their adja-

cent transect context, thus effectively linking transporta-

tion with land use.

intent

a h m u h tc, hv w; p uc; p c cu wk h , w phw, h h cw. Bcc m b ccm

m b c h .

a h m ub h tc,

m u vhc pmvm. s cub cvhc, hv pk v b u, w fc, c b p. P c u wk

m h pvm h bu.s u p. Bcc ccmm fc bku.

MorenaTural

Moreurban

TransecT

a: typical municipal roadway sections

Urban Village-Commercial Rural Connector*Village Connector*Village Connector*t5 t3t3 t1 t2t2t4

n:1. ti i c i

2. C dd id rD 20-9 id d i c di, dc ii,ic d ii c . a id 7.0 (3.5 c dici) i cdd i

i.


30/44


Cum Pv/Pubc s

thoroughfare des

Internal Village Streets- A Street Not Shown (Collector Through Vil lage)

B. Avenue (Vehicular)

23.0m ROW

A.Street Trees are Square-Pleached

B.Median Accommodates Stormwater

C.Setback is for hard paved entry,stoop,or must be

-

A. Commercial Frontage

B. Residential Frontage

A. 2.0m Frontage Zone: Stoop May Encroach to

within 0.5m of Drive

B. 2.0m Frontage Zone:Permanent elements

Fina Zone: 1.0m encroachment area for stairs,

movable planters,and overhead elements such

as balconies and lights.

Fina Zone: 1.0m encroachment area for stairs,

movable planters,and overhead elements such

as balconies and lights.

B.

B.

B.

A. A.

A.

A.

A.A.

A.

D.

C.C.

C.

3.0

mSidewalk

3.0

mSidewalk

6.0

mDrive

6.0

mDrive

5.0

mMedian

2.0

mSidewalk

2.5

mParking(Optional)

2.5

mParking(Optional)

4.0

mSidewalk

6.0

mDrive(Required)

6.0

mDrive(Required)

6.0

mDrive(Required)

1.5

mStoopEncroachment

1.0

mPlanterEncroachment

1.0

mFinaZone

1.0

mFinaZone

1.0

mNon-PermanantEncroachment

2.0

mStoopandPlanter

15.0m ROW varies4.0m

11.0m2.0m

6.0m6.0m

1.0m 1.0m

10.0m

8.0m

3.5m

1.5m

1.0m2.0m1.5m

2.0m

6.0m 6.0m3.0m 1.5m5.0m

C. Village Street (Vehicular) D. Village Street A (Fire Access-Cart) E. Village Street B (Fire Access-Cart) F. Passage (Pedestrian-Cart when Poss

1.5

mWalk

1.0

mFinaZone

1.0

mFinaZone

description

These street sections are typically private/publicly ac -

cessible thoroughfares designed for a specic character.

These sections are intrinsically linked to abutting build-

ings- typically T4, that form the streets as high-quality

public spaces.

(May be Public) (May be Public)

t5 t5t4 t4 t4 t4 t4


31/44


g

landscape des

civic space typesdiscussion

Landscape design includes both landscaping on private

property and in the public realm. In either case, land-

scape treatments are generally in character with their

transect zone and/or abutting transect zone. Landscap-

ing includes all horizontal surfaces, plant material, deco-

rative walls and fences, and other decorative elements.

In the private realm, landscaping includes landscaping

within frontages, on balconies, and foliage attached to

the building. In the public realm, it generally includes all

surface treatments within public rights of ways includ-

ing thoroughfares and other civic spaces, and in private,

publicly accessible thoroughfares and civic spaces.

landscape character

The McKinley Resort embodies an important landscape

duality: Firstly, the character of the natural hillside forest

including the many native plants, coniferous trees, and

the naturally occurring granite, and secondly, the char-

acter of the Okanagan countryside, famous for vine-

yards and orchards.

Each of these characters nds its place along the

transect.

intent

a h m u h tc, h xu cp pm. nu c hc m vb hh. th mph c ccu ppc m. Puc v

ch m b u p, c ch v cp. suc up wh phw, ,

ucu.

a h m ub h tc, cp v h p. sh ,b cp, b w cvw, h pv pm. th

pc c pc, bu h vv,cmppp pc m b u. V p p bu, bc, m p.

MorenaTural

Moreurban

TransecT

Park

a i cd ci. a p idd -

di idi . I dc ci d i, d, di,

dd d , iic did. p icd ci

ciii d d. p i, i jci cid.

t ii iz d 8 c.

GreenAn open space available for unstructured recreation. A green may be spatially dened by

dci idi . I dc ci d , -

ii c did. g ccd d. t ii iz d

1/2 c d i d 8 c.

Square

a c i cd ci d ciic . a q i i

dened by building frontages. Its landscape consists of paths, lawns and trees, formally

did. sq cd ici i . t ii

iz i 1/2 c d i iz i 4 c.

Plaza

a c i ciic d cci ciii. a z i i

dened by building frontages. Its landscape consists primarily of pavement. Trees are optional.

t ii iz i 1/4 c d i i 1 c.

t5

t5

t4

t4

t4

t3

t3

t1

t2

landscape character summary

T1/T2 nu, u chc

nu pv, hc, m

Pk uc

W phw, , uc ucu w p.

acuu cu v ch p

T3

nu cp w huh Pm c phb.

sm wc cu w u p.

Phw m wk c p k

W pv mch chc pcp bu.

g, pu, pk uc.

s hv m, uc

.

T4 lcp cc m p m b m mz. dcv p ccpb.

lw w c cu m p

V p p bu, p,pch, bc wh w huh cchm.

swk wk , ccmm wu b.

squ Pz hpv wh p p

T5 lcp cc h cp pubcpc.

P cp m m

V p p bu, p,pch, bc

lw w c p bu

squ pz hpv wh p p

swk x m bu.


32/44


scp, Pv, & l

landscape des

commercial streetscape

T5 Commercial Sidewalk-Trees in Grate

T5 Commercial Sidewalk-Grouped Tree Planter

t1 t2 T3 t4 t5 Specications

C hd

tbD

pi

tbD

p

tbD

C

tbD

D C

tbD

bidi scc

tbD

paving

Material

Phw, v, wk m b cuc cc pv, ck

, ph, u cmpcb v.

Pv pv uch cu, p, wk m b c

uc cc pv, ck , u cmpcb v, h m ppv b h drC.

Pv pubc uch qu, pz, wk, m b cuc cc pv, ck , u cmpcb v, cc, ph.

Conguration Pmb uc cu pv uc.

i pv , xp j bw pv hu b pwh ub u cv.

s hu m ck p ub u fc.

Pv cu hu c h u, uc u h .

lighting lh h b m wh h cuc vp. n um

u pm.

lw xu pv um hc hcm pm.

Ucv xu cu, ww h w.

lh h b m h qu qu hc

h b upuu.

dkk h qu h xu.

Pubc h h b pp cc h b h h h b cmm .

public lighting


33/44


landscape desW & d

walls and fences

Material

Fc w m hu b c wh h

chc m h pcp bu chcu.

Pvc, c k w m b cmp m c wh mhh cmuucc, cc, v xc upc c, , cmb.

Pvc c w m cpwuh , b cmp v w.

Fc t2 m b cmp w, wuh ,v w, m u m/ p.

t2 c b cmm .

Fc t3 cu m wuh v w . i t3t4, w c pm h pv h h

upp b w p wh cmb p, v c.

g m b cuc wuh w.

Conguration

g, w t4t5 m , w

t2t3 mp / m uc.

Fc w mu b ubm h drC ppv.

Fc w pm h pup

pv pvc wh cu p m wh h cuc vp .

Pm w c m b u t2 bu mu

b cmm .

W hh xc 6 hh.

M w h b mmum 8 hck.

F pm c/w k w t3 t5. Pm w wh t4 m b

bu pp .

B b hwbx p c

w.

abu, , p u cu

.

th k w qu w hh bw

.5m .75m, wh b cp h 0.3m ph.

retaining walls

Material

i t1t3 w m b cuc ,

m, cc, bu.

i t4t5 w m b cuc ,

m, cc.

t mb, w , vck c

w.

r w b cuc cmm .

Conguration

tw w p w: chcu w

cp w.

achcu w v ubu bu

pc wh bu m /pubc ccb phw .

achcu w m b up 12.0m hh whupp.

lcp w ccmm wh muc chc.

lcp w m b up 12.0 hh wh mmum 2.0m p 6.0m.

lcp w cuc cmm c t4t5

i t1t3, cp w h b b h cp u cu, wb

wh h cuc vp. d w bv 1.2m qu qu

P e. smp w mu b

ubm h drC.

th hc chc w b cm

m, c .

gu vhc p b

pv ccc wh pvc c qum hu b c h chc h chcu.

drainage & water best management practices-a transect reference

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Sour

ce,

DPZ&Co.

LightImprintNewUrbanism

-ReferenceOnly


34/44


iu

landscape wall det

Pedestrian access bre

up wall massing

Use of wall vs. ll allows trees

to be preserved near road-

way. This provides a mask.

Concrete Piers

break up massing

Tree masking

is typical

Natural Rock

built into wall

Use of native

granite facing

Vines on Wall Railing TBD

Wall rock and rock

on site are matched;

allowing wall to blend in

Stepping at 6.0m

using a Living Wall

Stepping at 6.0m

using a Living Wall

Use of decorative

vineyard plantings

where appropriate


35/44


iu

village wall det

Wall design and materials have common

design standard throughout the site.

Building structure built into the wall.

9.0 Metre Wall section to balcony.

9.0 Metre Wall section with vines.

Public walkway along wall.

Unit bridges over

walkway, ties into wall.

Stepping use

break up ma


36/44


P

planting list: public s paces and private frontages

landscape des

private planting standards t1-t3

New planting within T1-T3 areas should be designed

to integrate with the existing landscape. The following

standards apply to new planting:

nw h b p wh bck mch h

mm cx . g p 7.5 m h b qu h , w h c. sc, hh x h m b cu wh qum.

rqu w h b h 2.5m c mmum .05m 2 cp cuu pc.

dcuu pc m cu m h 50%

qu w .

nw p hu b u wh pb,

cmm McKinley Resort.

nw p cu h b x x

cu u up, pp ch pc.

P c h bh mmuc bz. dv, u p pc hu b p ufc umb pv80% uc cv wh w .

exp u w pm. ehcm h v u cv p. sm

w c wh u cu w, bu hu b w u .

a pp cp h b c c h cp p.

lcp wh c cu m b u.

private planting standards t4-t5

New planting within T4-T5 areas should not cause neg-

ative impact on the surrounding natural landscape. The

following standards apply to new planting:

iu pc hu b c , b

c v cuv.

P hu b wh c

p.

th u wcmb v h cu h ucu h chc h V.

t p hu , p m, v mpc hbu ucu vwh.

i cmm h p b w b w c cu whv / w m.

natural areas

Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) are mapped for

the village site and are regulated by policies within the

approved Vintage Landing Area Structure Plan. Natu-

ral Areas include not only these ESAs, but also natural

open spaces established by the Master Plan and include

the natural landscape surrounding T3 lots.

nu a b pv hu .

U mp c c vcu cuc qu.

Mm hcm hu w cmm

pcc uz huh h McKinley Resort . sckp phb wh u .

ac mm uch m, wp, h u h chmc pm b c p.

rk v, mv v, mv v wh h nu a phb, u ppv p cmph

v u mm p.

excavation near natural areas t pc c , 1.5 m u u h p hu c m ckp, fc,

h ubc.

P w xcv, uc p

b w huh b pp w ub pm z.

th m xcv hu b c mk wh qu pc huh c, c, b h mu.

av c chpp v u xcv. r b pu b w hcuub pcc.

r hu b xp u hw. r hu b pc b m m.

F c , xcv hu b b hu mj , pu b h wh c.

exp cu hu b wh ppp puc uch t K.

Cu wh hw ucu hu bx upp.

Pu hu w hcuu b pcc.

excv w wh c, uch

h u & phw.

TYPE T1/T2 T3 T4 T5 REPRESENTATIVE SP

Deciduous/Shade Trees

pii d

. liid i d.b e ci b eci

I d id d

s ts t

* Betula occidentalis (T1/T2

* Cratagus douglasii (T1/T

* Populus Tristis (T3)

Mountain Ash (T3)

Quercus macrocarpa

Acer Freemanii

Coniferous Trees

pii d i

o u o u b eci b eci

* Pinus ponderosa (T1/T2/T

* Pseudotsuga menziesii (T

* Larix occidentalis (T1/T2/T

Pinus sylvestris (T3)

Pinus cembra

Picea omorikaShaped Trees

m d ci

ic c

. Icd ,

d cd (d

i)

n a d b eci

o u, i

i ic

ii -

i

o u i pic

sc

* Populus tremlua Erecta (

Quercus ellipsoidalis (T3)

Abies Balsamea (T3)

Quercus robur Fastigiata

Liquidambar styracifua

* Juniperus scopularum

Orchard/Edible Fruit

fi t d sad i

d ic

i.

ad ii

i cd

ci

b ecipic sc d

ci

TBD

Vines & Climbing Plants

g d -

ii ciad i

d ic

i.

liid id-

i d

o id-

i d

o id-

i d , d i

ic c

Vitis vinifera - Grape Varieti

Celastrus scandens

Hedera helix Baltica

Lonicera hirsuta x sem

virens

Clematis spp.

o/p

n ad

b eci

dc, ,

d ii i

cd.

o i i

d d d

cc

o ii

d c d

i Ciic sc

* Iris spp

Berginea

Liatris

Lavender

Eupatorium

Filipendula

ud/hd

ni sci

i

d

ni sci

i

d

o u o u

* Symphoricarpos albus

* Amelanchier alnifolia

* Philadelphus lewisii

* Cornus stolonlifera

* Mahonia aquifolium

* Rosa nutkana/apicula

gdc

ni sci

i

d

ni sci

i

d

o u o u

* Arctostaphylos uva-ursi T1

* Juniper spp. T1/T2/T3

Pachysandra teminalis

Hypericum reptans

Cotoneaster apiculatus Tom

Thumb

n: ti i i i - c i i i DrC. b eci d, d i i idiid dc di . (*) idic i-d i ci.


37/44


sustainability standar

discussion

As a resort property, McKinley Resort is intended to ex-

emplify current sustainability criteria. At the basis of this

strategy is triple-bottom-line sustainability that includes

social, economic, and environmental sustainability.

Currently, this criteria is embodied in the new pilot LEED

for Neighbourhood Development (LEEDND) rating sys-

tem, and more broadly through the sustainable urban-

ism movement that integrates sustainability neighbour-

hood design with high performance infrastructure and

high performance building techniques. The follow list is

a a topical overview only, and represents a more com-

prehensive sustainability strategy that will be developedand evolve as the project is built.

sustainable neighborhood design Bu nhbuh: a hum m, cu , hu b bu h ccp hbuh.

Bu Cmpc nhbuh hh w h pv cuu pc.

Bu Cmp nhbuh mx u: hbuh hu cu h v

wh c pxm, v mx u/ccmm p.

Bu Wkb nhbuh: wk cc huh w mup, c p vhc.

C m bck pm.

Bu hbuh wh c pc mu b 5mu wk m c c c b c pubc pc.

C c c h pc cupv cvc pc cmmc h pc

Bu upp

Pm b w , w uv pubcpc huh.

av u cv bck ucu w chv m.

i p u

d cc u w c.

Pv vm v , pc 1:2 .

Pm jb/hu bc wh wkhu

Pm pv c cuu u.

C v pubc pc

Pc cvc u pubc pm c pubc pc.

high performance infrastructure

High performance infrastructure is implemented at the

scale of a block, neighborhood, or region, and includes

the following:

dc H

ghm h ch

ivm v uc

lwmpc m w b mm pcck h ppp cx

ruc uc pk

C

Pv cmphv cc pm.

U w cc w mucp pubc pc.

i h w bu cuc, v

U mmum w wh

Pv/hc w.

U pv m

ruc h pu

Puc cuu puc wh jc h hbuh.

supp lc Bu .

high performance building

High performance building is implemented at the scale

of the block and building, and includes the following:

Puu leed, leed , Bug bu cuc

U pv ch , bh h c

.

Bu hh u vu mmum r17 w,

r22 .

Bu cc, m h ch

cu.

U mmh h bu m

Uz cc m whv pb.

ruc cuc w huh , u, cc.

Pm w cv huh ww cp

c, w m,

ecu u cc cuc

Pm p .

emp v w

U c v, pb ww mchch v.

U lw e ww

U led h c cmpc uchuhu

U m / u h

U h cv ch v cpuxhu h

Mxmz h

spc e s ppc

U w m

M bu ub

U h hw m

U p

100% Fh ch u

U w VoC m M P, s,

ahv

U u mh cmp w puc

U wm cp, wb/cc

m

emp pm w m cpu ,

pcu, c. m bu hh vum

Pm u c c puc

M leed qum pb w

w h c z.


38/44

m c k i n l e y r e s o r t d e v e l o p m e n t kelowna, british columbiaV i l l a g e M a s t e r P l a n2012 Pcmk C ic. , V 4.0: Ju 2012 4 .0 Vi l l a g e Ar chi t ect u

introduct

4.0 village arChiteCture

discussion

For the past several decades, architecture has concen-

trated on the individual expression of isolated buildings,

often in contrast to their context. The underlying philos-

ophy has been one of relentless self expression of the

architect, rejection of past architectural languages, and

an architecture of time (fashion) r ather than place.

Long neglected, urbanism has resurfaced in North Amer-

ica to address a diminishing quality of life due to car-ori-

ented planning, and to address long term sustainability

through compact, mixed use, walkable human habitats.

McKinley Resort seeks to express this through a hillside

urbanism inspired by the complexity and character of

European hilltowns.

While an eclectic architectural approach may be suitable

to larger towns and cities, the intimate streetscapes and

high visibility of hilltown urbanism requires a coherent

architectural language. However, it is difcult to write

an architectural language. Traditional architectural lan-

guages emerge after centuries of evolution, with rened

sub-styles emerging during specic points in historey-

but always building from precedent. The result of this

slow evolution is the establishment of an architectural

vocabulary - a set of rules that builders and architects

can apply to their individual projects and contribute co-herently to the greater whole.

The McKinley Resort Style represents the initiation of

a unique architectural language - one built on the aes-

thetics of the emerging West Coast contemporary archi-

tecture, but set within intimate villages built on granite

hillsides amongst coniferous forests and vineyards. The

McKinley Resort Style as introduced by this Master Plan

is an intentional, rather than prescriptive code - largely

because the language is yet to be written. This section

provides intention, inspiration, basic principles, and min-

imum standards. Ultimately it will be up to architects to

write this language, and therefore imperative that each

responds through emulation to predecessing designs

within the village.

village architecture fundamentals

Architecture and Urbanism are inextricably linked within

a village. Villages have a distinct edge and centre, and

are comprised of urban blocks. Streets and pathways

form the primary public space between blocks, and voids

in the block structure form squares and plazas. There

are two main roles for buildings: Special buildings such

as civic buildings or other important buildings are placed

at important places in the block structure, often terminat-

ing an important street or viewshed. These are fore-

ground buildings (indicated as a terminated vista in theUrban Code) and are intended to call attention to them-

selves through expressive design and vertical elements.

The majority of the village is comprised of background

buildings that forms the fabric of the village- they visu-

ally emphasize foreground buildings (rather than com-

pete). Their architecture is simple and ultimately harmo-

nious with the greater village fabric, thus exemplifying

the local architectural language.

mckinley resort style

The McKinley Resort Style has three main ingredients:

1. Th b p, hm, mpxt

f th ep h t.

2. Th vt ppt, m, t

f tmp htt tht h m

t th wt ct f c

the American Pacifc Northwest.

3. Th h, t h, f ft,

t t f th ok V,

pt f th MK rt t.

instructions to architects

The principles, standards, and examples shown here

form a foundation for architectural design within the Vil-

lage. There are two additional rules:

1. ahtt mt p thh mt m

th m t xt b f th th V-

.

2. B mt b t f th

t txt, th pp th

bk f b.


39/44


iuv

village character summa

Granite Village Base

Expressive Chimneys

Granite Building BaseCrushed Granite Surfaces

Low Slope Metal Roofs

Rooftop Gardens and Trellis

Vertical Proportioning

Openings Inset into Block/Smooth Finish Wall

Awnings and Shading Devices

Varied Rooines

Intimate Courtyards

architectural design principles


40/44


schmc achcu

composition princip

urban structure facades: materials & openings

vic pid, ri C f t b, ac

sd bidi f bc wi Ii Cd d e-

i f

facades: configuration

vid, vic fcd n vi I

g f, p hid

roofline composition

Varied, Simple Rooines n vi I t b

rooflines

C sd D g piid

facades: sunshading

t ti d vi I wid ai r o s mcic s

facade composition

architectural design principles

These principles represent instructions for basic archi-

tectural composition in a village context. Exceptions to

these principles should be supported by a concise ratio-

nale, and are at the discretion of the DRC.

li mi a

(wid w d t-

c C vi)

mi C

a hiz li

(wid i

i cd c

ii c, ci

ic )

h b

(wid d D

Ic i s)

overview s lumb Psl, Fh chcu cc roofs mc


41/44

s


architectural standar

overview

The McKinley Resort Style and subsequent composi-

tion principles describe the intentions and basic com-

ponents for architectural design and urbanism as they

relate to character and aesthetics. The Architectural

Standards represent minimum requirements for archi-

tectural design as they related to the materials and con-

guration of specic building elements. These standards

may be superceded if the architect or designer provides

a detailed justication, and provided the proposed alter-

native standard is approved by the DRC. at

b t m b q p-

fed within the MRD Sustainability Manual.

walls th bu w m h xp hv m

h u , h m bv. Bu w h hw m h w m h bm uc, ww mb.

M h ch hz . Uc h b c gu s u m m b cc, h u , bck whmhh p. smhh cmu

ucc v ub w b xcp. Upp m m b m, cc, mhh cc ucc, , w, .

succ h b cmu m b c p. Fh h b mh h,

succ w hu xp ph 6 u w. s w hu c b p

m hck 6

s w h b qu . Cuu mu b quhb m u wh vw m m h, mu b ppv b h drC.

eiFs h m ub phb.

ach p h mch h bu w. ach p m h b h 12 x 12ch.

Cum p h b m w, b,

m, mch h u m. P h b h 6 x 6 ch. F W sp h mch h cbu.

Cu h b c m ppv cu

b. g m hh cmm cu P

s lumb Psl, F h chcu cc

h hh qu h cu, C c uc w mb.

Bu cuc hu mmzw.

Bu hu mxmz pv vm

m.

openings Ww h b m p umum, w v h hv c .

Ww h b , ub, phu, pb cm.

Ww p h b cu wh vc,hz, qu pp. Ww h b vc pp, bu m uz

hz pp mu, m b pcwh hz pp p.

Mu h b u v p x h x uc. P h b m pp, huhu h bu.

Mup ww h m uh p h bp b 4 ch mmum p mu. th c

h ww h h wh h c h w h h b uh mu ww.

B Ww h x h h

u u, b upp b vb bck. nh c ww hu b qup wh ub h vc.

d cu h b p

w, cmp w, m, . P C/Vc phb. gu xcp h b h .

sm Ww sc, pv, h cv h ww .

s, cu bu p u,h b m p w, m, .

shu h b m p w, Hpk, m. P umum v phb.

shu h b h uv p, z hp mch h c p, xcp upp , h b pmu. tc hu phb.

g c h b mxmum

3.5m w. i vm mxmz u h vc, z, h hv, kh h

ub.

roofs sp h b h wm xcp u m h b c , vz m, cc , b h m mp c m ppv .

F h b cmmc p

. gu, wpu pjc pp hb m vz m p umum h b hu.

Pcp , wh p, h b mmc b hp bw mxmum 8:12.

F h b uu b hz pp

w h 1.25m hh m h ck. Vu p pm.

ac m b h h 3:12. ovpp b pm wh h mb c wh bc, pch c h c.

sh m h b hbb pc mmum

1.0m m bu w. oh m phb.

ev h b p cuu pb. evwhch vh h .3m m hv c f.

r p, cu v ck, h bpc h p h mch hc h .

skh h b .

attachments Chm h x h u hv p

jc cp. Chm, wh vb, h b cc,, mh h ucc. Fu m b bck p vz m. r h hv p bm c hbu. Bm h c h .

aw h b p c whu

bm f p, h b cu hm mu ch uc cvmmb.

r, cv w h b , ,

cc. K qu h b pm, u m cuc.

y qupm, cu HVaC, u m, ch, h, p qupm, h ub, h

k h b pm . th c h b c wh pm cu wh wh .

oubu h b qupp wh u h wh

m c.

Bc h b m w, m

.

signs excp p umb, m t5 wh cmmc b.

P umb h b pc h pcp buc h .

Fc h b wh.

o b ch bu m b pm ppcu h Fc. such

xc .6m h c 2.5m bwk. F hp, x pm

b m b pp h c ch buv h uch xc 1.0m hh

h. s h b m w m. shp h b pqu x, xcp h wh h hp m b .

M cuu m b bck. Cmmc u m uz v pc xc .4m, cuc m / /

/ cuu xc 1.0m hh wh. a b c h m h bu.

s bv h u pm

b pc xcp . Upp b vu vu b cx h h M P.

urbanism urbanism


42/44


precedent ima

Medieval Charm Modernist Village

style & urbanism building types kelowna style


43/44


precedent ima

Vancouver Urban Courts & Stoops Packing Houses

kelowna style kelowna style architecture


44/44


precedent ima

Winery Interface Mission Hill Materials

Documents

McKinleyResortMasterPlan July2012 LR