13
McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

  • Upload
    aitana

  • View
    43

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze. Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400. McFall v. Shimp. Plaintiff- McFall needs a transplant Defendant- Shimp has high compatibility rating Shimp refuses to go through with procedure McFall files an injunction against Shimp. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

McFall v. ShimpCurran v. BoszeMcFall v. ShimpCurran v. Bosze

Jennifer GaneshLaw Values and Public Policy

STS 2400

Page 2: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

McFall v. ShimpMcFall v. Shimp

Plaintiff- McFall needs a transplant Defendant- Shimp has high compatibility rating Shimp refuses to go through with procedure McFall files an injunction against Shimp

Page 3: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

Plaintiff’s CasePlaintiff’s Case

Plaintiff’s Defense- King Edward I. St. Westminster 2, 13 Ed., I, c 24

This Court derives its power from this statute because this court is a successor of the English Courts of Chancery

Page 4: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

Defendant’s CaseDefendant’s Case

Common law- no legal compulsion to give aid or to take action

to save another human being

Page 5: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

JudgmentJudgment

“For our law to compel the defendant to submit to an intrusion of his body would change every concept and principle upon which our society is founded. To do so would defeat the sanctity of the individual.....”

Page 6: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

AppealsAppeals

Appealed and went to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

S.C. agreed with lower court’s decision This case set precedent for many other cases-

Angela Carder Story

Page 7: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

Curran v. BoszeCurran v. Bosze

Jean Pierre- 12 year old with rare form of leukemia

2 younger siblings that might be a match for a bone marrow transplant

Mother of the twins refuse to grant permission for testing

Page 8: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

Plaintiff’s DefensePlaintiff’s Defense

Best Interest Standard- what is the best choice for the minors?

Substituted Judgment- what would the children do if they were not minors?

Page 9: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

Defendant’s DefenseDefendant’s Defense

Curran believes that the tests and actual donation may harm the twins both physically and emotionally

Risks outweighs the benefits

Page 10: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

JudgmentJudgment

Petition denied

No concrete evidence that the twins would want to go through with the bone marrow transplant

Page 11: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

AppealAppeal

Went to Illinois Supreme Court

Decision of Circuit Court was upheld

Page 12: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

Questions? Comments?Questions? Comments?

Page 13: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze

ReferencesReferences http://imc.gsm.com/demos/dddemo/consult/statel

aw/cases_il.htm http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/lawmcfall.htm

l http://lawlibrary.ucdavis.edu/LAWLIB/June99/01

61.html http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ii910326.html http://www.nocirc.org/articles/prescott3.html