Mayhem at Silchar and Maneuvering in the Aftermath

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Mayhem at Silchar and Maneuvering in the Aftermath

    1/3

    Mayhem at Silchar and Maneuvering in the Aftermath

    Waliullah Ahmed Laskar

    The incident can not be termed as horrifying in view of what is happening inneighbouring state Manipur. No body was killed, though many could have had been. But

    the after effect of the incident is more than shocking. There was nothing but reign of

    terror. People were afraid to speak with each other even about household chores. BarakHuman Rights Protection Committee (BHRPC) team reported that when they went to the

    spot they encountered an eerie silence. Witnesses refused to talk. Victims were trying to

    avoid the team members. Fear and terror were visible in the eyes and faces of the peopleof the locality.

    It was an incident of brutal display of brute force. The terrifying effect of the incident was

    not as much as that of the maneuvering in the aftermath.

    Assam Rifles personnel belonging to the 5 th battalion camping at Jiribam, Manipur came

    to Silchar in Assam, a town known as the heart of Barak Valley, on 2 August, 2009,bought pan from a panwala, pushed a pistol into the mouth of panawala who had shown

    the audacity of demanding money for his pan and then created a mayhem establishing the

    reign of terror for the whole night.

    In a statement BHRPC detailed the incident:

    According to the reports, some jawans in plain clothes belonging to the 5 th battalion of

    Assam Rifles visited the College Road area in Silchar around 4pm on 2 August and kept

    loitering there for a few hours. They bought pans from a panshop owned by oneTrinath Dhar of the same locality and started to go away without making payment for thepans. They got angry when the panwala demanded money for his pans and started to

    hurl abuses and threats at him. At further entreaties for the payment the jawans beat

    him, tried to strangle him and one of the jawans put his service pistol into the mouth ofthe panwala. When people gathered the jawans went away but warned him that he

    would be dealt with appropriately later.

    Around 10.30 pm that night 5 jawans led by a major named R Gupta came back in a

    jeepsy car without number plate. They were in plain clothes. Most of the shops were

    closed at that time. They looked for Trinath Dhar, but his shop was also closed and he hid

    himself somewhere nearby. The jawans entered a nearby saloon named Ajoy HairCutting, which was still open, and started to break things and to beat people inside the

    shop. The reports alleged that the jawans hurled Sumon Sheel, a worker in the saloon,

    through the window into a drain several feet down. He sustained severe injuries.

    According to the reports, at the hue and cry people of the locality started to gather at the

    spot and the jawans kept beating indiscriminately whoever they could catch includingwomen and rickshaw pullers creating a mayhem. They also allegedly opened fire. Ten

    http://rightspeaks.blogspot.com/2009/08/mayhem-at-silchar-and-maneuvering-in.htmlhttp://rightspeaks.blogspot.com/2009/08/mayhem-at-silchar-and-maneuvering-in.html
  • 8/14/2019 Mayhem at Silchar and Maneuvering in the Aftermath

    2/3

    persons including Ajoy Sheel, the owner of the saloon, Sumon Sheel, a worker in the

    saloon, Trinath Dhar, the panwala who came out from his hiding when people gathered

    and Rapon Bhattacharya of Subhash Nagar were injured.

    At that time the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Headquarter, Cachar and the

    Officer-in-Charge of Silchar police station came to the spot with a large police force andbrought the situation under control. The police took the jawans including the major and

    the injured to the police station. The injured were sent to the hospital for treatment. But

    no First Information Report (FIR) was registered.

    The Assam Rifles major told the media persons that they were in an ambush there and the

    local people attacked them even after the jawans revealed their identity. He claimed that

    Assam Rifles personnel were acting in self defence. But there is no answer to thequestion why Assam Rifles did not inform the local police about their operation in a thick

    residential area which they are bound to do.

    Members of the BHRPC visited the area next day (3 August) in order to find out the factsabout the incident. They encountered with an eerie silence. Witnesses refused to talk.

    Victims were trying to avoid the team members. Fear and terror were visible in the eyesand faces of the people of the locality. After much persuasion and guarantee of protection

    of identity some victims and witnesses spoke out. Their accounts corroborated each and

    every facts stated above.

    They added that they were asked not to speak with the media and human rights groups

    except that the matter was settled amicably and that they had no grievances against the

    Assam Rifles personnel or Assam Police members. But the grievances were so acute anddeep that one of them went on to say that talks of human rights have meanings only in

    independent democratic countries and out of frustration he declared that India is neither

    independent nor democratic in actual sense of the terms. If you try to fight for yourrights legally they will kill you legally, he claimed. He went on, if you file a complaint

    with the police the investigation will be biased and at the end of the day the accused will

    not be prosecuted or if prosecuted will be acquitted for lack of evidence. According tohim, this is the best expectable situation. At the worst you will be encountered, he

    claimed. According to him, it is a practice of the security forces to make terrorist of a

    person who dares to point his fingers against them by planting arms and ammunitions at

    his residence and then they will kill him in a staged encounter. No human rights groupwill be able to save him, he declared.

    The statement said, BHRPC could not persuade the terrified victims to lodge a complaintwith the police regarding the incident. It reveals their lack of trust in Indian justice

    delivery system, which is very dangerous.

    One of leading local daily news paper carried the story of mutual settlement on 4

    August. The report informed that the matter was settled in a tripartite meeting among

    victims, Assam Rifles personnel and officials of Assam Police held at Silchar police

    station on 3 August. The news paper planted a new version of the incident completely

  • 8/14/2019 Mayhem at Silchar and Maneuvering in the Aftermath

    3/3

    contradicting what it told the day before. More over, it did not make any reference to the

    earlier story by way of refutation or corrigendum or whatever may be. The paper owes an

    explanation to its readers and the public. All other papers kept mum on the matter.

    It shows a conspiracy of silence. BHRPC thinks that there are ample grounds to conclude

    prima facie that the Assam Rifles, Assam Police, local media and some other localelements are in collusion with each other to protection the accused jawans from legal

    consequences. In effect, rights of the victims of crimes to justice, remedies and reparation

    are being denied.

    BHRPC concludes that the incident and the subsequent efforts to hush it up amount to

    vaiolations of fundamental rights laid down in Artiles 21 and 14 of the Constitution of

    India. Article 21 guarantees right to life and personal liberty, which includes, inter alia,right to live with human dignity, right to physical and psychological integrity and right to

    justice, remedies and adequate reparation in case of violations of any fundamental rights.

    Article 14 guarantees equality before and law and equal protection of law. The officials of

    the Assam Police violated this right of victims by not registering an FIR and by notinitiating prosecution against the accused personnel.

    The actions of the Assam Rifles personnel and officials of Assam police also violated

    international human rights obligation of the State of India in respect of the right to life,

    security of persons and property, right to physical and psychological integrity and right to

    justice, remedies and adequate reparation in case of violations as enshrined in theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant of Civil and Political

    Rights and other instruments.

    See: http://rightspeaks.blogspot.com/2009/08/mayhem-at-silchar-and-maneuvering-in.html

    http://rightspeaks.blogspot.com/2009/08/mayhem-at-silchar-and-maneuvering-in.htmlhttp://rightspeaks.blogspot.com/2009/08/mayhem-at-silchar-and-maneuvering-in.html