May-August 2012 Intern - American Institute of Architects Portlandaiaportland.org/wp-content/uploads/wpjobboard/resume/604/... · 2016-08-11 · SketchUp Rhino Grasshopper Mental

Ryan GedneyVice President Senior Project Designer at HOK [email protected]

Brad ShrockSenior Vice PresidentDirector: Sports + Recreation + Entertainment at [email protected]

HENRY J. LENNON3560 Broadway Apt.406Kansas City, MO 64111417-230-9929

[email protected]

HOK Architecture/ 360 Architecture, Kansas City, MO May 2013 - Current

A Kansas City based firm specializing in sports arenas, I have worked on new stadiums for both the Atlanta Falcons and the Miami Dolphins. A diverse building typology, I have been given the opportunity to help on a wide variety of work, from overall formal design to structural detailed components. I have been able to see these projects through SD, DD, CD and even through to CA, spending a month down in Miami overseeing construction. I have had the chance to learn and develop my skills in a plethora of design programs, becoming extremely proficient in Revit, 3ds Max, AutoCad, and all of the Adobe programs,

Design Professional

Trettel Design Inc, Lawrence, KS May-August 2012

A design/build firm, I was able to not only help in the design phase of our projects but the actual construction. Our projects ranged from the reno-vation of an old oil warehouse into our firms new offices to the full on construction of a new LEED certified home. I had the opportunity to work one on one with the head of the firm as well as sit in with him on many meetings and interactions with clients.

Intern

Experience

University of Kansas School of Architecture Danish Institute of Study AbroadFall 2012GPA 3.74Academic Excellence Award Undergraduate

Graduate Studio

GPA 3.85 GPA 4.0GPA 3.97

Dean’s List (2009-2014)Freshman Honors Scholarship (2009) J. Gordon Moorman Scholarship(2010, 2011)

Academic Excellence Award for top Architecture Student at Danish Institute for Study Abroad Fall 2012

Donald Ewart Memorial Scholarship (2012)Curtis Besinger Scholarship (2012)EFCO Scholarship (2013)

Education

Revit3DS Max AutoCad

SketchUpRhinoGrasshopper

Mental RayVrayPodium

Adobe PhotoshopAdobe IllustratorAdobe InDesign

Microsoft WordMicrosoft PowerpointMicrosoft Excel

Qualifications

Awards

Josh SheltonReferences

5th year professorPrincipal el dorado architects [email protected]

School Honor Graduate Banner Carrier for the 2014 University of Kansas School of Architecture, Design, and Planning

Thayer Medal Recipient for the Top Designer University of Kansas School of Architecture 2014

Graduated with Highest Distinction (Top 3% of Class) Masters of Architecture program

LEED Green Associate

000 LEVEL - GROUNDFLOOR

0"

050 LEVEL - MEZZANINE11' - 3"

100 LEVEL - MAINCONCOURSE

22' - 9"

200 LEVEL - CLUB46' - 3"

300 LEVEL - SUITE58' - 0"

400 LEVEL - UPPERCONCOURSE

69' - 9"

450 LEVEL - ROOF DECKCLUB

84' - 9"

500 LEVEL - UPPER BOWL112' - 0"

550 LEVEL - CATWALK144' - 0"

600 LEVEL - TOP OFCANOPY

158' - 6"

A1A401

SHADE CANOPY

METAL DECK SOFFIT

TENSION CABLE ATTACHMENT LOCATION

ESCALATOR AND CANOPY -400 LEVEL

ESCALATOR -200 LEVEL

INNER TRUSSRE : STRUCTURE

OUTER TRUSSRE : STRUCTRE

SPONSORSHIP SIGNAGENOT IN CONTRACT

SPONSORSHIP SIGNAGETO BE DEFINED IN FUTURE PACKAGE

R1R2R5 R6 R11R12 R15R16CL SL

ROOF SUPPORT - STEEL TRUSSENCLOSED WITH INSULATED METAL PANEL

TENSION SUPPORT CABLE

SCOREBOARD/SIGNAGETO BE DEFINED IN FUTURE PACKAGE

R15.5R11.5

ETFE MEMBRANERE: ROOF FABRIC PACKAGE

ETFE MEMBRANERE: ROOF FABRICPACKAGE

R1.5R5.5

000 LEVEL - GROUNDFLOOR

0"

050 LEVEL - MEZZANINE11' - 3"

100 LEVEL - MAINCONCOURSE

22' - 9"

200 LEVEL - CLUB46' - 3"

300 LEVEL - SUITE58' - 0"

400 LEVEL - UPPERCONCOURSE

69' - 9"

450 LEVEL - ROOF DECKCLUB

84' - 9"

500 LEVEL - UPPER BOWL112' - 0"

550 LEVEL - CATWALK144' - 0"

600 LEVEL - TOP OFCANOPY

158' - 6"

R5R6R11 R12CL SL R11.5 R5.5

A B

CD

Key Plan

GATE

A

GATE

B

GATE

H

GATE

E

GATE

D

GATE

FGATE

G

GATE

C

514131211101987654321

514131211101987654321

B

C

E

F

G

H

J

K

L

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

J

K

L

AA

sheet number

date

phase

issued for

project number

seal/signature

D

rev date description

M

N

P

M

N

P

16

16

17

17

18

18

19

19

20

20

21

21

R R

S S

T T

Miami Dolphins

347 Don Shula DriveMiami Gardens, FL 33056

Stadium Renovations

TRUE NORTH

Architect

Construction Manager

Civil Engineer

Structural Engineer

MEP Engineer

Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.300 W. 22nd StreetKansas City, MO 64108T: 816.472.3360

Hunt Construction Group, Inc.2450 South Tibbs Avenue (46241)Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-0128T: 317.227.7800 F: 317.227.7830

Langan Engineering& Environmental Services15150 NW 79th Court, Suite 200Miami Lakes, FL 33016

Thornton Tomasetti, Inc.101 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 1170Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1199T: 954.903.9300 F: 954.903.9301

Steven Feller P.E., Incorporated500 NE Third AvenueFort Lauderdale, FL 33301T: 954.467.1402 F: 954.467.5752

Code ConsultantFSC, Inc.9225 Indian Creek Parkway, Suite 300Overland Park, KS 66210T: 913.722.3473 F: 913.722.3484

Associate Code ConsultantSLS Consulting, Inc.1825 Ponce de Leon Blvd., #565Coral Gables, FL 33134T: 786.352.7377F; 306.441.6622

Food ServiceWilliam Caruso & Associates8055 East Tufts Avenue, Suite 1320Denver, CO 80237T: 303.649.1600 F: 303.649.1660

Broadcast - Sound - Audio VisualDiversified Systems363 Market StreetKenilworth, NJ 07033T: 908.245.4833 F:908.245.0011

Vertical CirculationLerch Bates12421 NW 35th StreetCoral Springs, FL 33065-2413

LightingME-Engineers10055 West 43rd AvenueWheat Ridge Colorado 80033T: 303.421.6655 F:303.421.0331

Landscape ArchitectDesign Studio BocaLandscape Architects and Planner2300 Corporate Blvd. NW, Suite 214Boca Raton, FL 33431T: 561.955.8623

COPYRIGHT © 2015 Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.

Original drawing is 36x48. Do not scale the contents of this drawing

121500.01

1 APRIL 2015

BID/PERMIT

P2.8

121500.01

A201

EXTERIOR REFERENCEELEVATIONS - NORTH/SOUTH

1/32" = 1'-0"A1 A155

J1

1/32" = 1'-0"A1 A155

A1 EXTERIOR REFERENCE ELEVATION - SOUTH

1 04/01/2015 ASI 050

� � ��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

�

�

��

� �

��

��

��

�

��

�

��

�

��

�

��

�

��

��

�

��

�

��

��

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

�

��

�

�

�

�

�

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

� �

� �

� �

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

� ��

Originally constructed in 1985, The Miami Dolphins Stadium has played host to some of the largest events in sports. From Super Bowls to World Series the stadium has seen it all. However like many structures from its time, the stadium was in need of an upgrade. With a seating capacity that was too large for its current fan base, seats that where drastically far from the playing field, and no protection from the harsh heat of the south Florida sun, the Dolphins were looking to make some improvements to there current home.

Though there has been a current tread of teams constructing brand new stadiums form the ground up, the Dolphins saw potential in there existing structure and decided to do a renovation to what they already had. They contacted our firm to help them in resculpting there original seating bowl and designing a new shade canopy to sit atop the stadium

Miami Dolphins Stadium 2014 - 2016 HOK Architecture

*all images property of HOK Architecture

Coming into the project I was asked to become a part of our roof team. Consisting of four core members we were tasked with designing and coordinating the construction of the roof canopy. For such being such a large portion of the project, our team was relatively small. However this gave all of us the opportunity to get to know all the ins and outs of the canopy and really get to “own’ certain elements. We were assigned certain areas of individual focus, mine being the mast, the scoreboards, and the translucent ETFE roof membrane. I was able to work directly with our project lead, our structural engineers, and the client in order to achieve a design that worked for all parties. In the end I was extremely pleased with the results and felt I was able to make many of the contributions to the final design.

In the spring of 2016, we were approached to develop a new master plan for the University of Missouri’s main athletic campus. The University was looking to do a complete redo of all existing structures with hopes to provide new facilities for the Student Athletic Center, Indoor Practice Facility and exterior Practice Fields. With a scope so large, the University needed the project to be able to be broken down into phases and segmented into individual projects. Each of these pieces could be sold to donors separately, in hopes to raise enough money for the whole project. In order to get the investment of these donors, the University needed design and imagery to show exactly what it was they were buying into. That is where I stepped in.

After the initial programmatic layout of the site was complete, I was asked to a provide a thorough schematic design to both the exterior and interior. I would be providing images of key spaces to give an idea of what the overall concepts and aesthetics would be. The opportunity was amazing, getting to work highly conceptually to a level of detail not usually seen at this stage. The work was really well received by the University and the project as a whole is still currently in the works.

Mizzou Athletic Campus 2016 HOK Architecture

*all images property of HOK Architecture*all images property of HOK Architecture

The design on the interior program was incredibly diverse. With multiple sports using the facility as a main gathering space the building had to serve multiple functions within its walls. This included team meeting spaces, locker rooms, medical treatment centers, weight rooms, coaches offices, administrative offices, dining halls, and student study rooms to name a few.

This project proved to be one of the first times that I had the opportunity to really lead heavily int he schematic designs of an interior and I found the whole experience to be incredibly fun and rewarding. Working with our client and the University’s brand standards it was great to be able ot design spaces that not only work functionally but also helped to promote the pride of the school. The diversity of the spaces and their functions led to a large assortment of programmatic needs as well as differing aesthetics. I was very pleased with the end result

For my final project in Denmark, we were asked to design a Center for Nordic Culture along the Copenhagen harbour front. The Center was to showcase the unique cultural works of the five Nordic countries; Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Though the countries are distinct and unique on their own, they also share a common history and past. This has led to many similarities in the values and qualities of these countries, a unique style that is undeniably “Nordic.” Our center was to focus on 3 core areas: design, fashion, and food. I wanted my project to capture this unique cultural style. For my design I decided to go with a form that is purely Nordic in its roots, an iceberg. The Iceberg motif helped to accomplish a few things. For one I felt that some of the current buildings along Copenhagens harbor were just “big boxes.” I found them to be somewhat out of scale and actually walling off the rest of the city from the harbor instead of inviting the public to the waters edge. I decided to create one of these large boxes and then like a block of ice break it into smaller individual shards. From there the “shards” could serve as the main three programmatic sections. On the surface these would act like three separate entities, however underground they would be brought together by a connective core. Much like the Nordic countries themselves, this core would serve as a foundation connecting what would otherwise appear to be seperated distinct entities.

Center for Nordic Culture 2012 Danish Institute of Study Abroad

In order to ensure light reached this bottom connecting level, I pulled the floor slabs off of the wall, allowing the channel glass walls to be flood-ed with exterior light. This basement level would also lead to an exteri-or gathering area, where changing public art exhibits could occur. This space would then move out to a large open dock space by the water, for the public to enjoy its recreational amenities

Gallery

Gallery

Residence

Exterior Plaza

Resturant

Lobby

Gallery

Offices

Residence

Fashion Retail

Entry

For my fifth year studio we were tasked with developing a master plan for the the South Shore Central district of Austin Texas. Currently an abondoned run down area of town, the district sit on prime lake side real estate just minutes form downtown. As we began to develop our overall form, we looked at the site conditions that could help shape the layout. Our first move was to create three large “green fingers, that cut through the site and returned to the lake. This provided park space for the residents of the district as well as direct views to the downtown skyline. Next we created paths that cut though the large parcel of this site. One was to be a large vehicular access way, and then another pedestrian pathway that sliced diagonally through the site. We then took the remaining forms and push and pulled their heights to create a large dynamic range of forms. These differing heights allowed for views through the site, while shorter buildings with green roofs provided an expanded park view for residents in higher levels.

City of Austin Masterplan 2014 University of Kansas

The success of our design heavily depended on the development of these “green fingers.” They would provide the largest communal gathering area, would be the leading sustainable factor of the site, and would be the biggest argument for the raised height of the structures. We spent a large amount of our focus on insuring these fingers created a varying dynamic of differing heights and spaces. We looked at a large variety of street sections, investigating how these fingers interacted with both the vehicular street and the buildings themselves. The buildings themselves were divided into 900 sqft units and 1,200 sqft units. We designed for these large units to be aimed at families and placed them in the lower structures with private roof gardens on top. At the end of these structures large triangular areas were created by the sliced pedestrian pathway. We took these somewhat “awkward” spaces and decided to develop them into shared community space. The spaces would provide amenities that could not be housed in the single units themselves and would be more beneficial to be shared.

The home can be broken down into three

main components. On the bottom level of the

building is the kitchen and living area. The

walls of this section are glass doors that open

up to the front courtyard space and the back-

yard. During the warmer summer months the

inhabitants will be able to open these doors to

create one large indoor/outdoor space.

The two sleeping floors have identical floor

plans. Each given a “plug in” space in which

occupants could use their computers and

other common space needs. There are also

two rooms with sliding walls, allowing for the

space to be flexible and adapt to the occu-

pants needs. The upper half of these walls are

interior windows to help light enter throughout

the space.

The bathroom, staircase and entry room are

all put into their own separate form, providing

all the “core” services to the rest of the build-

ing. This was given a heavier concrete material

and helped to define it as an anchor for the

rest of the spaces.

M A I N L I V I N G S E C T I O NS L E E P I N G C O R E

S E R V I C E C O R E

The scheme proposes that the building

be placed behind a perforated screen.

This screen creates a small courtyard

in front of the home, a common feature

in traditional Danish homes. This

screened-in courtyard would help

serve many purposes. For one, the

screen helps create a protected space

for small gatherings and more intimate

human scale activities. Simultaneously

it would also help create a sense

of separation from the surrounding

“housing serpent”. This screen would

also create a blank facade during the

day, creating a moment of calm within

the “loudness” of Ørestad. However

during the night, it would light up like

a “lantern” revealing the space beyond

and animating the street life.

My first project while studying in Denmark was to design a Row House to be built in the new up and coming neighborhood of Ørestad Nord. As we began, I started to observe and analyze the homes and apartments of my Danish friends. Danish customs and way of life are much different than that of America. Some amenities found in any common American home, are non-existent in Denmark, and vice versa. For example in a Danish home one would never walk directly into a grand living space, instead opting for a small mudrooms in which a visitor can take off their shoes and coat before entering the home. Little things like this as well as much larger differences, such as a focus on courtyards and light qualities, really began to influence my work. I wanted to design a home that could truly fit into its surroundings, that would be a desired home and living space for the common Dane.

Residential Row House 2012 Danish Institute of Study Abroad

Living Room

Kitchen

Courtyard

Entry

A

B

Ground Floor

WorkspaceMaster

Bedroom

Plug-In Space

Plug-In Space

Childrens Bedrooms

Floor 2

Floor 1

C

B

A

A B

Documents

May-August 2012 Intern - American Institute of Architects Portlandaiaportland.org/wp-content/uploads/wpjobboard/resume/604/... · 2016-08-11 · SketchUp Rhino Grasshopper Mental