32
May 2009 Changing Direction Federal transportation funding Christof Spieler http://ctchouston.org

May 2009 Changing Direction Federal transportation funding Christof Spieler

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

May 2009

Changing Direction

Federal transportation funding

Christof Spieler

http://ctchouston.org

May 2009 2

May 2009 3

FHWA FTA

May 2009 4

May 2009 5

In the road business since 1893

FHWA

May 2009 6

Federal roadway funding

May 2009 7

Federal roadway funding

Photo: Kir Murray

May 2009 8

Federal roadway funding

May 2009 9

The Grand Parkway

May 2009 10

Step 1: Add project to Regional Plan

1966: add to Major Thoroughfare and Freeway Plan

May 2009 11

Step 2: Environmental clearance

Sept 2008: Record of Decision

Dec 2007: Segment E Final Environmental Impact Statement

1999, 2000, 2003, 2007: public meetings

1993-2007: Environmental process

May 2009 12

Step 2: Environmental clearance

May 2009 13

Step 3: Feds fund the project

Local20%

Federal80%

March 2009: TxDOT allocates $181 million to Grand Parkway

May 2009 14

Missing step: Assess cost effectiveness

The 15 miles of SH 99 from I-10 to US 290 will cost $1 billion to build and maintain over its lifetime, while only generating $162 million in gas taxes. – TxDOT, November 2006

May 2009 15

Missing step: Assess cost effectiveness

“The Grand Parkway… will be an opportunity to open up areas for development in the Greater Houston area” – John Barton, TxDOT

May 2009 16

In the transit business since 1961

FTA

May 2009 17

The Southeast Line

METRO’s Southeast rail line

May 2009 18

Step 1: Alternatives analysis

Feb 2002, May 2002, Jan 2003, Mar 2003: public meetings

Dec 2001- Nov 2003: Alternatives Analysis study

May 2009 19

Bonus step: Referendum

November 2003: Voters approve METRO Solutions

May 2009 20

Step 2: Add project to regional plan

June 2004: public workshops

February 2004: TPC adds Southeast Line to RTP

May 2009 21

Step 3: Meet cost-effectiveness requirements

June 2005: METRO switches to BRT

April 2005: FTA gives medium-low rating

May 2009 22

Step 4: Environmental clearance

February 2007: Record of Decision

January 2007: Final Environmental Impact Statement

July 2006: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, public hearing

Feb/Mar 2006: Public workshops

May 2009 23

Step 5: Try again

Oct 2007: METRO goes back to LRT

May 2009 24

Step 6: Environmental clearance (again)

July 2008: Record of Decision

May 2008: Supplemental EIS, public hearing

October 2007: FTA asks for SEIS

May 2009 25

Step 7: Risk analysis

2008-present: risk assessment

May 2009 26

Step 8: Feds fund the project, maybe?

Local50%

Federal50%

May 2009: FTA indicates that FFGA may be issued FY2010

March 2009: $30 million from stimulus on second try

May 2009 27

15.2 miles 6.2 miles

Which project should be funded?

May 2009 28

Which project should be funded?

$622 million $680 million

May 2009 29

Which project should be funded?

103,246 people+jobs (3 mi.) 163,000 people+jobs (1/2 mi.)

30

“This Administration believes that people should have options to get to work, school, the grocery or the doctor that

do not rely solely on driving. We want to transform our transportation system into a truly multimodal system with strong alternatives to driving in order to maximize highway capacity, combat traffic congestion, reduce our reliance on

oil and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.”

- Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation

May 2009 31

FHWA FTA

Do we need to kick the buckets?

May 2009 32

Questions?

http://ctchouston.org