Upload
denis-harrell
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 1
HUD RHIIP Training
Case Study 2: Bennett Family (Public Housing)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 2
Bennett Case Study:Process Overview
• Topic presentation• Students complete case study
– Using Appendix C, File Review Checklist Worksheets
• Students review PHA’s HUD 50058• Students complete Appendix A, Tenant File
Review Checklist• Review correct checklist and HUD 50058
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 3
Bennett Case Study: Topics
• Annual Income– Self Employment– Imputed Welfare Income
• Imputed Welfare Income and (PH) MEID
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 4
Bennett Case Study: Topics
• Rent Calculation – Mixed family rent calculation
• Income based rent• Flat rent
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 5
Self-employment
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 6
Self-employment Income
• Treat as operation of a business/profession– Count net income
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 7
Self-employment Income
• Net income is – gross income less
• business expenses• interest on loans• depreciation
– Use straight line depreciation – see IRS guidelines
• withdrawal of cash/assets for reimbursement of family’s investments in the operation
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 8
Self-employment Income
• Do not deduct expenses for expansion or capital improvements
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 9
Self-employment Income
• Estimating anticipated income for self-employment may be difficult– Family may not keep formal records
• Family could maintain a monthly log of income and expenses for PHA– Use average over a period of 3 or more
months
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 10
Self-employment Income
• Interim recertifications may be required to reflect changing circumstances
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 11
Self-employment Income: Example
• Mary James sells beauty products door-to-door, on consignment
• November/December are biggest sales months but has sales all year long
• Has no formal records of income except IRS form 1040
• What should be used to determine annual income?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 12
Self-employment Income: Example
• Answer: With no other information available, use the income reflected on her form 1040 as her annual income.
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 13
Self-employment Income:
• Other IRS Forms applicable to self-employment – Schedule C: Profit or Loss From Business– Schedule E: Supplemental Income and Loss– Schedule F: Profit or Loss from Farming
• Copies under reference tabs
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 14
IRS Resources – Other IRS Forms
• Form 4506: Request for Copy/Transcript of Tax Form– Can order tax return transcript 1040 series during
current calendar year and 3 years prior– Verification of nonfiling– Form W-2 Information– Copy of tax forms and all attachments including W-2
• $23 charge for each tax year
• Requested items will be sent to taxpayer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 15
IRS Resources – Other IRS Forms
• Form 8821: Tax Information Authorization– Can be sent to Appointee (PHA)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 16
IRS Resources – Other IRS Forms
• IRS Letter 1722– Tax account listing – Shows
• Filing status• Exemptions claimed• Adjusted gross income• Taxable income• Taxes paid
– Family can obtain by calling 1-800-829-1040
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 17
Imputed Welfare
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 18
Imputed Welfare Income
• Congress has now linked welfare reform to housing reform
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 19
Imputed Welfare Income
• QHWRA established two situations where PHAs cannot reduce rents when families have welfare benefits reduced– Welfare fraud– Non-compliance with economic self-
sufficiency requirements
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 20
Imputed Welfare Income
• Instead of reducing rent, PHA must “impute” welfare income equal to the amount of reduction in welfare benefits
• Only applies to families who are required to participate in economic self-sufficiency activities in order to receive full welfare benefits
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 21
Imputed Welfare Income
• Does not apply if reason for welfare benefit reduction is:– Expiration of lifetime or other time limits
on welfare benefits– Economic self-sufficiency requirements
completed but family member cannot find job
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 22
Imputed Welfare Income
• Does not apply if reason for welfare benefit reduction is…– Noncompliance with a non self-
sufficiency requirement– Because of an earlier inadvertent
overpayment
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 23
Imputed Welfare Income
• Verification must be obtained from welfare agency of:– Amount of the welfare reduction– Term of the reduction– Reason for the reduction– Any subsequent changes in the reduction
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 24
Imputed Welfare Income
• PHA must rely on information provided by welfare agency
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 25
Imputed Welfare Income
• After verification the PHA is required to compute rent exactly as if the welfare benefit reduction had not occurred, until:– Reduction ceases, or– Resident obtains some additional type of
income
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 26
Imputed Welfare Income
• If the family has imputed welfare benefits and their income from other sources then increases:– the increase offsets (takes the place of) the
imputed welfare income instead of simply being added to the family’s overall income
– when new income equals or exceeds imputed welfare benefits, imputed welfare is no longer counted
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 27
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
• Monica Smith’s welfare grant was reduced due to failure to comply with economic self-sufficiency, as verified by welfare agency
• Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 28
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
• Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
• What is her monthly– Imputed Welfare Benefit– Total Income – counted for rent calculation?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 29
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
• Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
• What is her monthly:– Imputed Welfare Benefit $200$200– Total Income counted
for rent calculation $500$500
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 30
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
• Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
• Two months later, Monica gets a job earning $150 per month
• How will her income be reported?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 31
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
• Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
• Two months later, Monica gets a job earning $150 per month
• How will her income be reported?
–$300 Welfare cash payment$300 Welfare cash payment–$150 Employment income$150 Employment income–$ 50 Imputed Welfare Benefit$ 50 Imputed Welfare Benefit
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 32
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
• Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
• Now, Monica earnings increase to $250/mo
• How will her income now be reported?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 33
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
Original grant was $500 but is now reduced to $300, for 12 months
• Now, Monica earnings increase to $250/mo• How will her income now be reported?
–$300 Welfare cash payment$300 Welfare cash payment–$250 Employment income$250 Employment income–$ 0 Imputed Welfare Benefit$ 0 Imputed Welfare Benefit
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 34
Imputed Welfare Income: Example
Monica’s total monthly income will increase to $550 because the income increase from employment that occurred after the welfare benefit reduction is greater than the amount of the welfare benefit reduction.
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 35
Imputed Welfare Income
• A family who has an imputed welfare benefit reduction will never pay less than the rent that was based on the former welfare income
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 36
Imputed Welfare Income
• If the welfare benefit reduction occurred prior to admission, there is no imputed welfare benefit – the PHA counts only the amount of actual cash benefits received
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 37
Imputed Welfare and MEID
• Families who have welfare income imputed may qualify for the earned income disallowance when they go to work
• Include the imputed welfare income as part of the baseline income (prior to the earned income increase)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 38
Imputed Welfare and MEID - Example
• Evelyn Jones’s full monthly welfare benefit was $500 ($6,000/yr) prior to $150 sanction
• Evelyn found a job paying $1500 per mo and she qualifies for the earned income disallowance
How is Evelyn’s income calculated?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 39
Imputed Welfare and MEID – Example Answer
• Answer: The $150 imputed welfare income plus the $350 welfare cash payment make up Monica’s $500 baseline for the disallowance ($6,000 annually)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 40
Imputed Welfare and MEID: Answer
• If welfare benefits end after employment:– count first $500 of employment income– exclude the remaining $1000 as the
disallowance during full exclusion period ($1,000 is the incremental increase)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 41
Welfare Benefits End After Employment
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 42
Answer continued
• If welfare (and sanction) continue after employment:– Count $350 welfare plus $150 of
employment income (which offsets $150 imputed welfare income), keeping pre-employment income counted at $500, and…
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 43
Answer continued
• If welfare (and sanction) continue after employment…– Exclude remaining $1350/mo
employment income as the disallowance during full exclusion period
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 44
Welfare & Sanction Continue After Employment
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 45
Mixed FamilyRent Calculation
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 46
Mixed Family Rent Calculation
• Mixed families are those families comprised of some eligible family members and some ineligible family members
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 47
Mixed Family Rent Calculation
• Eligible family members may be:– Citizens, including naturalized citizens– Nationals (owe permanent allegiance to
USA)– Noncitizens who have eligible
immigration status
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 48
Mixed Families
• Ineligible family members include:– Noncitizen students on a student visa,
and their noncitizen family members– Family members choosing not to contend
their citizenship status (noncontending members)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 49
Mixed Families
• The number of ineligible family members will determine the proration of rent
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 50
Prorated Rent Calculation (PH)
• Step 1: – Determine TTP as you normally would
• Step 2: – Subtract TTP from PHA’s Public Housing
maximum rent to get maximum subsidy (if all members were eligible) CFR 5.520
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 51
Prorated Rent Calculation (PH)
• Step 3: – Divide maximum subsidy by number of family
members to get “member maximum subsidy”• Step 4:
– Multiply member maximum subsidy by number of eligible family members (results in eligible subsidy)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 52
Prorated Rent Calculation (PH)
• Step 5: – Subtract eligible subsidy from PH maximum
rent to get prorated TTP• Step 6:
– Subtract Utility Allowance from prorated TTP to get the Tenant Rent for a mixed family
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 53
Prorated Rent Calculation: Example (PH)
• Jones family has 6 members. – Four are eligible citizens– Two are noncontending members– PHA’s PH maximum rent is $600– Family’s TTP is $250– Utility Allowance is $50
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 54
Prorated Rent Calculation (PH)
Public Housing Maximum Rent $600
Minus TTP - 250
Family Maximum Subsidy = 350
Family Maximum Subsidy $350
Divided by total family members / 6
Equals Member Maximum Subsidy = 58.33
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 55
Prorated Rent Calculation (PH)
Member Maximum Subsidy (before rounding) $ 58.33
Times number of eligible familymembers x 4
Equals Eligible Subsidy = $ 233
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 56
Prorated Rent Calculation (PH)
Public Housing Maximum Rent $600Minus Eligible Subsidy - 233Equals Revised TTP = $367Minus Utility Allowance - 50Equals Prorated Tenant Rent = $317• The Jones family will pay $117 more in rent (317-200)
due to the presence of two ineligible members.
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 57
Prorated Flat Rent (PH)
• If a mixed family requests flat rent instead of income based rent and the flat rent is less than the Public Housing maximum rent, then the flat rent needs to be prorated (unlikely)
• Formula found in Appendix 3 of form HUD-50058 Instruction Booklet
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 58
Prorated Flat Rent (PH)
• First compare the unit Flat Rent with the PHA maximum rent. – If maximum rent is less than or equal to
flat rent, do not prorate flat rent– If maximum rent is greater than flat rent,
must follow the steps in Appendix 3
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 59
Mixed Family Flat Rent > Maximum RentExample 1
• Mary Jones, a mixed family, asks for Flat Rent– Flat Rent is $700– PHA Maximum Rent is $500
• Since Flat Rent is greater than Maximum Rent, use Flat Rent with no proration
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 60
Mixed Family Flat Rent < Maximum RentExample 2
• Johnny James, a mixed family, asks for Flat Rent– Flat Rent is $550– PHA Maximum Rent is $600– Total number in family = 5– Total number eligible = 4
• Since Maximum Rent is greater than Flat Rent, proceed with proration of Flat Rent
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 61
Mixed Family Flat Rent: Example 2
• Maximum Rent $ 600• Minus Flat Rent - 550• Equals Family Maximum Subsidy =$ 50• Maximum Family Subsidy $ 50• Divided by total number in family / 5• Equals = 10• Times total number eligible x 4• Equals Eligible Subsidy =$40
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 62
Mixed Family Flat Rent: Example 2
PHA Maximum Rent $ 600Minus Eligible Subsidy - 40Equals Prorated Flat Rent $ 560• The James family will pay $10 more in flat
rent (560-550) due to the presence of one ineligible family member.
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 63
Monitoring Review
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 64
Bennett Case Study:Process Overview
Ground Rules– Objective: complete case study– Time: Approximately 1 hour– Work individuallly– Trainer and trainer aides will assist if needed– Please keep noise volume to a minimum
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 65
Bennett Case Study:Process Overview
Instructions for Part 11. Review PHA file data and complete
Appendix C (Tenant file review worksheets)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 66
Bennett Case Study:Process Overview
• Resources for case study – Case information begins page 8-13– Verifications (pg 8-23)– Appendix C, Tenant File Review Checklist
Worksheets (pg 8-41)– Cubzide PHA Policies/Schedules (pg 6-5)
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 67
Bennett Case Study:Process Overview
Instructions for Part 21. Review PHA’s HUD 50058 (Handout)
2. Complete Appendix A, Tenant File Review Checklist to record discrepancies
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 68
Annual Income Table Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 69
Dwelling Unit/ Utility AllowanceWorksheet
• What did you put for the Total Utility Allowance?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 70
Adjusted Income Worksheet Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 71
Adjusted Income Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 72
Adjusted Income Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 73
Adjusted Income Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 74
Adjusted Income Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 75
Total Tenant PaymentAnswer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 76
Prorated TTP and Tenant Rent - Answer
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 77
Review Appendix A
• Discussion
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 78
Thinking Points
• PH Maximum Rent– Has the PHA established PH Maximum Rent
using HUD formula?• Third party verification
– Has the PHA documented why it was unable to obtain third party verification if review of documents was used?
May 2003 Chapter 8: Case Study 2- Bennett 79
Thinking Points
• Imputed welfare – – Has PHA received all needed information
from welfare?– Does PHA correctly offset amount of
imputed welfare income when additional amounts come into the family after sanction begins?