. MARIE MIN!^ DIVISIONRECEIVED

MAY)9!99dPM

J*

41N16NW2001 2.18496 NOGANOSH 010

RECEIVEDMAY 2 O 1998

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT]

CB 1099057

EXPLORATION WORK

NOGANOSH TWP NTS 4IN/l6

D.MacMillan May 19, 1998

i.ABSTRACT

Work performed by D. MacMillan (Lie. #D20561) on claim block 1099057 was carried out between Nov. l, 1996 and Jan. 10, 1997. The purpose of the project was to investigate an aeromagnetic anomaly considered to be a propsective kimberlite diamond target. Exploration work consisted of linecutting (3300 ft. BL, 24,000 ft line), magnetometer surveying (27,000 ft @ 252 stations), geological grid mapping @ l in. = 1 00 ft.) and two overburden till samples.

Exploration work has outlined a main anomaly in the north central grid area with dimensions of approximately 1200 ft. x 1500 ft. Overburden sampling encountered one kimberlite indicator mineral in sample TL97-1 taken over a 3000 gamma mag zone in the northern sector of the anomaly. Overburden Drilling Management Limited has identified one GIO purple pyrope garnet in the sample.

The presence of the GIO garnet as well as the physical geometry and size of-the anomaly suggests the area has good potential for a kimberlitic intrusion. Further work is warranted.

41N16NW2001 2.18496 NOGANOSH 0 10C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i. Abstract...................................................................................!

1.0 Introduction..........................................................................l1.1 Location and Access.............................................................!

2.0 Geology................................................................................l2.1 Regional................................................................................!2.2 Local.....................................................................................l2.3 Lithology...............................................................................32.31 Granitic Intrusive.................................................................32.32 Tonalite...............................................................................3

3.0 Geophysics............................................................................33.1 Introduction...........................................................................33.2 Survey Results........................................................................3

4.0 Overburden Sampling............................................................54.1 Introduction...........................................................................54.2 Till Samples...........................................................................54.21 Sample T97-1.....................................................................54.22 Sample T97-2.....................................................................54.3 Results.......................................!..........................................5

5.0 Summary..............................................................................6

References................................................................................16

Appendix A: Overburden Drilling Management Ltd.Laboratory Log Summary and Notes.....................?

Appendix B: Laboratory proceedure flowchart fromAvrill and McClenagghan (1994) .........................14

Map: Attached

List of FiguresFigure 1. Location Map of Project Area......................................2Figure 2. Location Map of Grid Area..........................................4

1.0 INTRODUCTION

In the fall of 1993 a local prospector uncovered diamonds in Michipicoten River alluvium. The Ontario Geological Survey announced that the find consisted of two microdiamonds of l .05 and l. 13 carats. Follow up work by the OGS in the 1993 and 1994 field seasons consisted of regional overburden surveys which encountered many kimberlite indicator minerals in the Wawa area. A total of 309 KIMs were collected in 250 till samples suggesting that kimberlite intrusions in the Wawa area may be a host for diamonds.

l. l Location and Access

The prospect is located 12 miles SE of Wawa Ontario in the Township of Noganosh within map area NTS 41N16. The prospect is located on claim block 1099057 held by D. Mac Millan of Sault Ste. Marie Ontario. The area lies south of Highway 101 and is accessible by the Tik logging road. The grid area is situated approximately at kilometer 9 of the Tik road.

2.0 GEOLOGY

2.1 Regional

The project area lies within the Wawa Subprovince of the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. The belt is about 40 km. in width and strikes approximately northeast from Lake Superior. Supracrustal greenstone lithologies are Archean in age surrounded by Archean granitic rocks outside the belt.

The PreCambrium metavolcanic rocks in the belt are grouped in four major sedimentary- volcanic divisions (Sage ,1994). These consist of 1) intermediate mafic metavolcanic rocks; 2) intermediate - felsic metavolcanic rocks; 3) clastic metasediments and 4) chemical metasedimentary rocks. Granitic intrusives comprise the remainder of the greenstone belt.

2.2 Local Geology

Geology on the claim block is based upon sparse rock exposure with outcrop density less than 2^0 of the grid area. Rock types in the immediate grid area consist of granitic intrusives and tonalitic rocks which straddle the magnetic anomaly to the north and west (refer to map, enclosed). Structure in the area consists of a weakly to moderately developed E-W foliation with highly variable dips.

-l-

{i^^\i~ 1™ ^rr l, 'V\?^SMBS^^^.S:^. ^.^•^'-•Xi'.^:. : V ,,-::.... iiy iw-^-- nv x ^ -\ * *~---*- p , - Jir d' *\A Sfc' 1 -^--'^ 1

^.^^3^,; . V r ^ANV Nfi \ Y ^~ A \r(

^hCI ^'""W1"1 ^4 'A^'A10^^m:\\ '-y **\\ ^w, r \ K, ~iv^•" ' /^ *" ^N^*' i

/r'H.tin^^ /^ ,V/ A1'^/'/ X*M.vm,,,,;

y wn^w x r A l-**Ks \'^ /(L^.. ,... x'f r..r-\^-Jx J'~^^"'

\ (f - x J'^CXWS-^'TK-- ~",x\ -^3 -N ' ^TYiiVj'i'/^/A --^

\ X- S' ••KTIOeJlAK/.^tllr.t.l ,. ? . -i ^" lliVif~.i.vii' l'V" I'V^1'"-':- '-'.i.! X5 " " ""'•-^/•-^l \,1^ \ X-t.";'J

. /' '-"^tVx ""^ :'\^

fiSi^fv -c ' -'yx^L^ u^*-:isC,,-f 5" v1 .. ^r&ttSTJi'-/y' ••y&p/^2 ^.:,^^/.'-^

j .11"—-\t.-^AO(f"V-'-- '^ l - " I." ,A '-"- ^

Figure l: Location Map of Project Area

2.3 Lithology

2.31 Granitic Intrusive

This unit is pinkish in color, fine to medium grained, subequigranular, massive to moderately foliated. The rock contains 40 07o quartz, 45 y* potassium feldspar, 5 0/* plagioclase and 10 Vo biotite.

2.32 Tonalite

This unit is light grey in color, fine to medium grained, subequigranular, moderately to well foliated. The rock contains 60 07o quartz, 1 5 07o plagioclase and 25 07o biotite.

3.0 GEOPHYSICS

3.1 Introduction

Magnetometer surveying was conducted using a McPhar M700 survey instrument. The instrument is a vertical field flux gate magnetometer. The measurement scale has a sensitivity of+A 5 gammas. The survey required 6 man days covering 5.17 miles of grid line and 252 stations.

3.2 Survey Results

A toal of two anomalous magnetic zones have been outlined on the grid area. The anomalies were delineated manually using qa 1000 gamma contour. The main anomaly occurs in the north central part of the grid with dimensions of approximately 1200 x 1500 feet. The anomaly is ellipsiodal in shape with an embayed southern edge. No coincident rock outcrops occur over the anomaly.

A smaller secondary one line anomaly was outlined at the western end of line 12N. The anomaly occurs over four stations. Rock exposure of granitic intrusive is situated within the zone. It is uncertian whether this exposure represents bedrock due to the low magnetic suseptibility of this rock which lies in in more magnetically responsive area.

-3-

\

Figure 2: Location Map of Grid Area

4.0 OVERBURDEN SAMPLING

4.1 Introduction

Two glacial till samples were collectd along timber road cuts. Material was collected and screened down to a 2 mm size fraction. Processing and analysis of the screened fine fraction was conducted by Overburden Drilling Management Ltd. The labratory proceedure (Avrill and Mcclenaghan, 1994) is designed to recover gold and kimberlite indicator minerals including pyrope garnet, chrome diopside, Mg-ilmenite and chromite, (refer to Appendix B).

4.2 Till Samples

4.21 Sample T97-1 (BLO/15N)

Till material was collected from a timber road cut. Sample weight 19.7 kg.

Coarse Fraction: Angular to subangular, poorly sorted granules, pebbles @ 4 mm to l cm with local cobbles. Rock fragments consist of mafic volcanic, tonaltic gneiss and pinkish granitiod types.

Fine Fraction: Light brown to buff fine grained sand consisting of qtz + fspar + mica.

Fine/Coarse Fraction Ratio 70/30.

4.22 Sample T97-2 (14N, 2+50E)

Till was collected from a timber road cut. Sample weight 18.55 kg.

Coarse Fraction: Angular to subangular unsorted granules to cobbles, 4mm -15 cm. Rock fragments consist of tonalite gneiss, pink grantitic, fine grain mafic and medium grained mafic rocks types in order of abundance.

Fine Fraction: Red brown, fine grained sand consisting of qtz + fspar + mica

Fine/Coarse Ratio 50/50.

4.3 Results

Heavy mineral and kimberlite mineral detection on glacial sediments submitted to Overburden Drilling Management encountered one GIO garnet in sample T97-1. The purple chrome garnet was identified in the .25mm - .50 mm size fraction. Sample T97-2 contained no KEVIs.

-5-

5.0 SUMMARY

A. Overburden sapling has yielded one GIO garnet in sample T97-1 over a 3000 gamma zone of the main magnetic anomaly.

B. The 1200 x 1500 foot dimension of the main anomal;y falls within the lower size range of a kimberlitic intrusion.

C. The mag zone is in close proximity to the McVeigh Creek Fault, a major regionalstructure.

C. Preceeding factors suggests the possible presence of a diamond bearing kimberlite intrusion and further work is required to follow up on this possibility.

-6-

Appendix A:

Overburden Drilling Management Ltd. Laboratory Log Summary and Notes

-7-

29-01-37 IB:17 OVERBURDEN DRILLING 10=6132268753 P.02

DILUMQ MENT LIMITEDABBREVIATIONS

CATALOGStzeafClQtL Matrix:

G: Granules S: Sorted P: Peobtes U: Unsorted C: Cobbles 3D. Sand F. Rne

8L: Boulder crips M: Medum BK Bedrock cNps C: Coarse

ST: SKIt Clatt Composition- CY: Clay V/5: Volcanics and Sediments OR: Organics GR: GranNcs Y: RacOon present LS: Limestone *: Fraction more abundant than normal OT Other Llthotogfes -: fraction toss abundant Ihan normal

(refer to footnotes) N: Fraction not present TR: Ony trace present L Lumps present NA: Notappfcabte OX: Oddzed Colour

B: Beige PP: Purple GY: Grey PIC Pink GB: Grey-beige OC: Ochre GN: Green L: Ught GG: Grey-green M: Medium BN: Brown D: Dark BK Black

GOLD LOGNumber at Qmlru: Qpma/te:

T: Number found on sheldng tabte *: Percentaga of HMC (estmated from P: Number found by panning panning of table concentrate)

gr Grains (estmated number)Ttikkasas uM: Microns (1/1000 mm)

C: Calculated thdcness of grain (rrtcrons) py. Pyrtte M: Achal measured thickness of grain (microns) cpy: Chalcopynte

spy: Arsenopyrrte marc: Marcasite

L/G: Umortte/GoelNte aid: SMertte

KIM (kimberlite Indicator mineral) LOGGP: Purple garnet (G9AG10 chrome pyrope). GO. Ctartoamanteganietlndud^bofteclcf|1lc(G3)andCr-poor

megacryst (G1^2) vartele*; In some samples, may Indude a few grains of common crustal garnet (G5) taddng dtagnosflc majsfans or crystal faces.

DC: Chrome dopalde. emeraid green: pater green ta*Crdtap*lde picked separately. IL: PlcroHnenrte: In some semptes, may Indude a few grains of

common crustal Ilmenite taddng dagnoeflc Inclusions or crystal faces.

CR: Chromite.MMSIM (metamorphosed massive sulphlde/magmatic indicator mineral) LOG

Ky: Kyartte Cr Chromite Sft SUPnartte Sps: Spessaftee

Rut Rutile Gat Goethite St Steirolte Py: ^r"*^ O,, owne Cpy ChaJcopyrtte

Opac Orthopyrexene

29-01-37 16:IS OVERBURDEN DRILLING 10=6132268753 P . 03

Page l

01/29/97PROJECT: NACKILLANTOTAL OF l SAWLES.FILENAME:

DOUG MAOI1LLAN - HAUA SAMPLES

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED LABORATORY SIMPLE LOG

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

01/29/97

CLASTS

SAMPLEUMBER BULK

REC'UED

MACMILLAN TS7-1 19.70 T97-B 18.55

WEIGHT (KILOGRAMS)

TABLE SPLIT

19.70 IB. 55

t? H

CLASTS

3.00 7,20

1-8 H TABLE CLASTS FEED

1.40 15.30 3.00 9.35

6 I Z E

C C

(2.0 i

PERCENTAGE

U/S

5 S

GR

95 95

LS

0 0

OT

m m

MATRIX (1.0 li

GRAIN SIZE 0 DISTRIBUTION COLOUR R

GS/U SD ST

U * Y S M.C t

CY SAND CLAY .

- LOC LK Y MOC MX

CLASS

SANDY TILL GRAU+SOIL

2S--01-97 16:19 OVERBURDEN DRILLING 1 0 = 6132268753 P.05

PAGE l DOUG MflCMILLAN WAUA SAMPLES 01/29/"J 7

*

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED

GOLD GRAIN SUMMARY SHEET MISCXDMUUlJftN. WR2

Sample Number of Visible Gold Grains Non-Mag Calculated PPB Visible GoldNO. === ===B;=ss=====l^:±=:™IIaiHIM = s== ========^:s: Weight ^~~~~—^5^^==±====:========^s=55ts========

Total Reshaped Modified Pristine Total Reshaped Modified Pristine

MACMILLANT97-1T97-G!

01

01

00

o0

53.226.9

O O O O l l O O

23-01-97 .16:lS OVERBURDEN DRILLING 10=6132268753 P . 04

PAGE l DOUG BACWILLAN ~ UAMA SAMPLES 01/29/97

* BOLD CLASSIFICATION

VISIBLE GOLD FROM SHRKING TABLE flND PANNING

MISC\DW*ilJAN,WR2 NUMBER OF GRAINS TOTAL l OF PANNINGS O ———————— - —— -

MEASUREMENT (MICRONS) RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NQN CALC V.G.SflKPLE # PANNED rrrrr-rr-: ^^^ i————— ***** NAG ASSAY

Y/N DIAMETER THICKNESS T P T P T P 6MS PPB REMARKS

MACMILLANm-1 N NO VISIBLE GOLD

T97-2 N 25 l 25 5 C i

23-01-37 -16:13 OVERBURDEN DRILLING 1 0 = 6132268753

Page l HUG BflOIILLON — UAUA SAMPLES

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANA6EMENT LIMITEDLABORATORY SAMPLE LOG

KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL COUNTS 01/29/97PROJECT: NACWLLAN TOTAL OF Z SAMPLES

P . 06

01/29/97

SHHPUNUMBER

NACHIUAN T97-I T97-2

TABLE CONCENTRATE (1.0 H (gratsl

M. I. SEPARATION S.G 3.20-0.25

TOTAL H M.I. TOTAL TOTAL -O.S5 0.25 TO 0.5 TOLIGHTS MAG NON-MAG n 0.5 n 1.0 M

11110.0 9b7.fc 74.8 1^9 52.7 2.9 39.6 10.2 911.2 3*6.9 508.7 10.7 24.9 3.8 16.9 4.2

K1H COlKT

0.5 TO 1 li

GP 50 DC IM CR

ooooo00000

0.25 TO 0.5 n

GO DC

1 0 0 0

T

0TA

LK [Ms

1 0

29-01-37 -16:20 OVERBURDEN DRILLING 10=6132268753 P.07

Page l DOUG MACMILLAN — UAUA SAMPLES 01/29/97

KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL PICKING FOOTNOTES:*

GAMPLE NOi REMARKS

PROJECT: MACMILLAN

T97-1 Abundant diabasic track chips in concentrate. SEM check fro* O.25-0.S mm fraction: l purple GP candidate - l SP. Also picked 2 pale eierald green low/very low-Cr diopside, l chalcopyrite and l colourless spinel fro* O.25-0.S m m fraction.

T97-2 Abundant diabasic rock chips in concentrate. SEM checks fro* O.E5-O.5 m m fraction: 3 rounded to octahedral CR candidates - 3 CR.

Appendix B:

Overburden Drilling Management Ltd. Flowchart

-14-

Bufc SampU

Qu/aciv Sampd. 300s STORE

SoU

VHin SampI*: OiaaggriQau

(Wi'cr/Caleon Solution)

*2.0Q mmSTORE

•^ ———l btainSftmpli:: w*i Si*va 4i 1 l.OO tnd 2.00 mm

*C T5 mmS'CPc

:: ;.S3 mm Pi-sma

F-arxn

< 1 .00 (Tvn Li;til Frac:or, STORE

L/C": r-ata'onS'CnE

Fwronva;- sac Fracon STC^E

-^ ————

-* ————

l *VOOmm i Siting Tabli and ' Gold Grain Count

-

; Ta^li Corcenra:r. i F^ar.-ii-ij i.id Cold Grain Ca--il

i

^ Te2!i Concar-au: i H&avy Licue S*para*in i (SG 3^0)

1

Hsffo' F-acJofl: - Finr-Jc-sxSija.'ixr

j-^'.c Ficrar.. fr. c C.5C t.-x! 0.2S -

O J* la CJO m* Nonfirtorra J^*sc Frecw-%1

*Jc F iInacasr

- .M lo 2.00 msi - .; -v Liquid

;SG 3.20)'Jjhi Fristiioo

STOSE

-iesy FracSon: F c : -i ;n*3C S*pa.-a x;

f ••r-znaflnabe FraC'c.- l STORE j

; SO (o l .Wmm ' S':-- i-om*cn*6c Fr

l.00 lo 2.CM m;.-.F-. .^on:

( F c :ng

Q Rai on* n-x*rP'cV*i3 or.-y tar cfirorr.i py apt ard yvom* iTo(;K: P'cJurt tar cNnrri pjiops. crantt Qa(n*l.crjorT(

Mount c i.-, and Exxnln* win; ^

(ri.-.- :

References

Avrill, S.A.i and McClenagghan, M.B. 1994. Distribution and Character of Kimberlite Indicator Minerals in Glacial Sediments,C14 and Diamond Lake Kimberlite Pipes, Kirkland Lake , Ontario.Geologic Survey of Canada Open File 2819, 46 p.

Sage, R.P. 11994. Geology of the Michipicoten Greenstone Belt; Ontario 'Geologic Survey, Open File Report 5888, 592 p.

11

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT ____ OFFICE

y Figure 2: Location Map of Grid Area

Ministry of Xothem Developmentand Mlnea

Mining Ad, Subnotion 66(2) and 66(3), R.8.O. 1 990

Transaction Number (office use)

Asseument Files Imaging

try of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the d to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder, ling Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor,

41N16NW2001 2 .18496 NOGANOSH 900

Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. - Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holders) (Attach a list if necessary)Client Number.

Address . ^^

4ZTelephone Number •44i

SSMNUE t? U 4-^2-Fax Number

Name Client Number

Address Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)

i — i Physical: drilling, stripping,l — ' trenching and associated assays Rehabilitation

Office UseCommodity

,Total S Value of V/ Work Claimed f , ~)(j

0|Dty Month Y Mf

ToYnr

NTS ReferenceGlobal Positioning System Data (if available) Township/Area

N^"W. Mining Divisiona

M or G-Plan Number Resident Geologist District

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)

T^TM^ UjN(^ kiL-LfMsiress 42. Cp-cftjL QTT cf^H ^OT. ItAtSZ

Name

Address

Telephone Number 'T^) ( 4^?

Fax Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

l, , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completionjand, to the best pf my knowledge, the annexed report is true.

L- i

liidus jirik must a^comp1lf1r|j

jo be recordedr . ':fte\.~!:^"ti'-'"t * :- " '-f--'---'"'***

perfonnect at thl

,ands that are subsequently staked as a-•:*4--.-Lf/"-*-.-- . ^ ' .i'^^J^wfet^vV'i^j^.*^?.*.^"; '.-^k.'X^',-:', -tsaiI^^MW

Mining Claim Number

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

e9

10

1112

13

14

15

1234567

1234568

• '

Column Totals

No. of Claim Units

4

2

;?f ;v ^ value of work pertormecKgl. y-. before recording s mining claim

(a) Work now within a claim. Show KXWfe of cost.

S4980

N/A

.-•J.T's

^f" !:l:

* "

9''''

0 *

: '"

(b) Work on adjacent Crown lands. Show aS'Vb of cost.

S725

N/A

^ tf--'

•'9

J '

——— S...v, ^

Value of work applied

to this claim

S1600

S 800

t**f: .^

xi^^c^-xe u .,^V^

\^^1\^^

Value of work assigned to other

mining claims

WOO

N/A

k\\ \"VNr^i*"

Bank. Value of work to bo distributed at a later date.

$3305

N/A

In __________________________ , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Print Full Name)

Jiubsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to me claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Authorized in Writing

lDDate

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( ^ ) in the boxes below to show how you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

C~] 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.FI 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; orC3 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; orCI 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have no! indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use OnlyDeemed Approved Date

Dale App'ovea

Date Notification Sent

fotai Value of C'edi: App-ovec

Approved 'Of Reco'd.ng by Minng Recoraer (Signature)

O24C (02/96,

Ontario ' Ministry ofNorthern Development and Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Transaction Number (office UM)

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5.

Work TypeUnits of Work

Depending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.

Cost Per Unit of work

Total Cost

. Qo

u

tcOo .

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

w^.Food and Lodging Costs

Total Value of Assessment Work

Calculations of Filing Discounts:

1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 1000Xo of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 5007o of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK 0.50 Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted. -

Certification verifying costs:-

, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may(please pnftnull nameT

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on/the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as

to make this certification.(recorded holder, "agent, or state company position with signing authority)

l am authorized

0212 (02/96)

Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Schedule for Declaration ofAssessment Work on Mining Land-

Transaction Number (office UM)

Mining Ctaim Number. Or ifwork was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

i o^ oS^f

-

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

1 ^

Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land

13. ^Of?.^'

DIRI

Value of work applied to this claim

l21^g.E4

1

^CElVElM A/ 2 ft jpcij

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMF' .

f 7 ~Z Q f A.l L~ ;o^ br

—— --y —— ^ —

—— i fm^ AJ) ^ ——————

Value of work assigned to other mining claims

J .

i

NTtj

. —— -

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date

^ ———

0290(02/96)

Ministry of Ministere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines Ontario

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road

September 30, 1998 6th FloorSudbury, Ontario

DOUG G. MACMILLAN P3E 6B542 CAROL CRT.,SAULT STE. MARIE, ONTARIO Telephone: (888) 415-9846P6A-4S2 Fax: (877)670-1555

Visit our website at: www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm

Dear Sir or Madam: Submission Number: 2 .18496

Status Subject: Transaction Number(s): W9850.00028 Approval After Notice

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at benetest@epo.gov.on.ca or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 12878

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .18496

Date Correspondence Sent: September 30, 1998 ________Assessor:Steve Beneteau

Transaction First ClaimNumber Number Township(s) l Area(s) Status Approval Date

W9850.00028 1099057 NOGANOSH Approval After Notice September 27, 1998

Section:12 Geological GEOL 14 Geophysical MAG

All deficiencies associated with this submission have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment credit has been approved as outlined on the attached Distribution of Assessment Work Credit form.

Correspondence to: Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Resident Geologist DOUG G. MACMILLANSault Ste. Marie, ON SAULT STE. MARIE, ONTARIO

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 12878

Distribution of Assessment Work Credit

The following credit distribution reflects the value of assessment work performed on the mining land(s).

Date: September 30, 1998

Submission Number: 2 .18496

Transaction Number: W9850.00028

Claim Number Value Of Work Performed

1099057 10,677.00

Total: S 1 0,677.00

Page: l

Correspondence ID: 12878

* H 15 (O o o

inn:

Iliii

iipip

P"M

SIilH

iii'

if-|l*

3"al

|f*ii

hils

if^*

*iSl??

*i

O

*

*

J!i

iB

m

n S

li S

m

n "t

m

S S

r

l I o a.

S

**

SV

IB

3,

f P

bi

i ',

z-a

^

c s

f

25

e o

2 S

5^

m

3)

0=

0m

6J

x

c i

H•5

H

OT

-n

**

O>

O

z

b r

i-m

r

^3)

-*

C)

9 m D am

•n

m ni o

m CO

S 2

? 5"

NEB

ON

AIO

NQ

UET

TW

P

:o

O H 3

T?

O)

PAW

IS

TWP.

o

m

CD f

i

lro o

r\)

Land

Managem

•ranch

E w

5a

fc M

> ±

0 o"

(O2

Hs

m

3

m

O l

CD o Cf

l

oc

en

II fi 3 ^

Bn

(J

C if S* iO 5 m iV* m

,

y

Tl

g S

4 HI 0

0)

M 8

'* *i * ^^ " 8 50 "S 1

5 *

o |. | 1 | 'i

SCALE CH O *"

o

a

o

>m

x^

.C? ;

m

."5

-0.. Z

S.053 cm

o

O o

^ z

2

3! ~

F 5

ci

a * a5

88 X

m

m

- I

- 3

5 l

sS s

il

H

•O m

O m Z

0 Vt

r

2

o x

5

^^ ^ o o

o

x V) m C m Z

Hen O

) O

fi

Z 5s is

z s

r*i

m

C

3) lil

H

O I

z 5

om

s

nO

-n Q

2 is o s.

TJ 5 Z

in 11 l

o 31 X o

c/) Q

m 5

O -

C

Z ^

S

^o

OT 2

z -a i

C

O w

m2 ofc

"m

r-

W

"O

OT3,

mm

P

co m

O

3) O

m

41H16NW2001

2.18496

NOGANOSH

210