50
1 1 Society of Petroleum Engineers Society of Petroleum Engineers Mature Based for New Solutions Conference Visegrád, 21 November 2013

Mature Based for New Solutions Conference Visegrád, 21

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

11

Society of Petroleum EngineersSociety of Petroleum Engineers

Mature Based for New SolutionsConference

Visegrád, 21 November 2013

Production increase for low pressure gas Production increase for low pressure gas wells with liquid loading problemswells with liquid loading problems

A Case StudyA Case Study

Zoltan Turzo, PhD. UoM

Mihaly Gyukics, Andras Filip, Sandor Puskas MOL NyRt.(and many others)

Recognition of fluid loadRecognition of fluid load

20

00

/01

20

00

/08

20

01

/04

20

02

/02

20

02

/09

20

03

/04

20

03

/11

20

04

/06

20

05

/01

20

05

/08

20

06

/03

20

06

/10

20

07

/05

20

07

/12

20

08

/07

20

09

/02

20

09

/09

20

10

/04

20

10

/11

20

11

/06

20

12

/01

Qg

as

, P

r Q

l

Well# - EN-87

Qgas

Pr

Ql

Recognition of fluid loadRecognition of fluid load

DateDepth

[m]Pressure

[Mpa]∆∆∆∆l

[m]∆∆∆∆p

[Mpa]Density

[kg/m3]

4/9/2009 10 6.6411500 7.572 1490 0.931 62.51800 7.866 300 0.294 98.01955 8.793 155 0.927 598.1

31/08/2010 10 4.4111500 5.009 1490 0.598 40.11800 6.789 300 1.78 593.31955 8.172 155 1.383 892.3

Recognition of fluid loadRecognition of fluid load

Pre

ssu

re, D

en

sity

Depth

Pressure

Density

Recognition of fluid loadRecognition of fluid load

20

00

/01

20

00

/07

20

01

/01

20

01

/07

20

02

/01

20

02

/07

20

03

/04

20

03

/10

20

04

/04

20

04

/10

20

05

/04

20

05

/10

20

06

/04

20

06

/10

20

07

/04

20

07

/10

20

08

/04

20

08

/10

20

09

/04

20

09

/10

20

10

/04

20

10

/10

20

11

/04

20

11

/10

20

12

/04

Qg

as,

Pr,

Ql

Well# - EN-E - 14

Qgas

Pr

Ql

Recognition of fluid loadRecognition of fluid load

DateDepth

[m]Pressure [Mpa]

∆∆∆∆l [m]

∆∆∆∆p [Mpa]

Density

[kg/m3]1/9/2010 10 4.405

1000 4.796 990 0.391 40.31900 5.107 900 0.311 35.22060 5.17 160 0.063 40.1

28/09/2011 10 3.9961000 4.332 990 0.336 34.61900 4.617 900 0.285 32.32060 4.673 160 0.056 35.7

Recognition of fluid loadRecognition of fluid load

Well #

[bar] [bar] [oC] [bar]En-É-14 26 11 29 33 Intermittent 2-3 daysEn-É-18 27 10 25 14 Intermittent 2-3 daysEn-87 20 6 19 0 Continuous cont.En-88 20 7 16 0 Continuous cont.En-61 24 6 16 14 Intermittent sensible for WHPEn-67 20 8 12 8 Intermittent sensible for WHPEn-84 48 8 42 0 Intermittent 1-2 monthesEn-25 26 7 11 0 Intermittent sensible for WHP

Producing timeProducing WHP

WHT CHP Production type

Closed WHP

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Well# - EN-E-14 (1 closed, 2 producing)

PressureTemperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

3000

3100

3200

3300

3400

3500

3600

3700

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

Well# - EN-E-14, closed gradient

Pressuer

Temperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

Well# - EN-E-14, 1st producing gradient

Pressure

Temperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

Well# - EN-E-14, 2nd producing gradient

Pressure

Temperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 500 1000 1500

Ca

lcu

late

d D

en

sity

, k

g/m

3

Pre

ssu

re, k

Pa

Depth, m

Well# - EN-E-14, 2nd producing gradient

Pcalc Pmeas. Calc. Dens.

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Time, x26 s

Well# - EN-87, (2 producing)

Pressure

Temperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re, k

Pa

Depth, m

Well# - EN-87, 1st producing gradient

Pressure

Temperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

Well# - EN-87, 2nd producing gradient

Pressure

Temperature

Gradient measurementsGradient measurements

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Ca

lcu

late

d d

en

sity

, k

g/m

3

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

Well# - EN-87, 2nd producing gradient

Pcalc. Pmeas. Calc. Dens.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 50 100 150

Pre

ssu

re, b

ar

Temperature, oC

Well# - EN-E-14, dew point curve

Saturation pressurte Well presuere along the tubing

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 50 100 150

Pre

ssu

re,

ba

r

Temperature, oC

Well# - EN-87, dew point curve

Saturation pressure Well pressure along the tubing

Well# -EN-E-14, water content

corrected wellstream composition

Well-EN-87, water content corrected

wellstream composition

Component mol%

C1 78.509C2 3.328C3 1.713

i-C4 0.65n-C4 0.522i-C5 0.253n-C5 0.186C6 0.193C7 0.135C8 0.067

CO2 3.313N2 (+O2) 1.343

H2O 9.788

Total: 100.000

Component mol%

C1 75.669C2 4.358C3 2.122

i-C4 0.76n-C4 0.635i-C5 0.283n-C5 0.207C6 0.184C7 0.111C8 0.053

CO2 3.418N2 (+O2) 2.8

H2O 9.4

Total: 100.000

Well# Well# -- ENEN--EE--14 k14 kúútt

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 5 10 15 20

De

pth

, m

Pressure, bar

Well# - EN-E-14, Calculated and

measured pressure

Calculated

Measured

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 50 100 150

De

pth

, m

Temperature, oC

Well# -EN-E-14, Calculated and

measured temperature

Calculated

Measured

Well# ENWell# EN --8787

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 5 10 15

De

pth

, m

Pressure, bar

Well# EN-87, Calculated and measured

pressure

Calculated

Measured

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 50 100 150

De

pth

, m

Temperature, oC

Well# EN-87, Calculated and measured

temperature

Calculated

Measured

Well# - EN-E-14Echometer through tubing shots

Time Pto Ll Ptin

kPa m kPa

11:04:33 1187 1266.0 3181

11:14:51 1286 1813.0 3381

11:24:36 1304 1864.0 2140

11:35:33 1407 1772.0 2417

Well# - EN-87Echometer through tubing shots

Time Pto Ll Ptin

kPa m kPa

12:03:13 1572 544.6 4707

12:26:42 3098 1087.7 5365

12:44:17 4133 1853.4 5142

12:59:38 4423 1851.7 5536

13:13:22 4533 1872.2 5669

New measurements in Well EN-E-14 to detect fluid loading

Planned:

I.Closed gradient measurement, immediately after complete fluid removal from the bottom, measurement frequency is 200 m, and 50 m near the bottomII.FBHP measurement in 3 steps

1. WHP is the usual 12 bar, until the stabilization of the flow

2. WHP is 5 bar, until the stabilization of the flow3. WHP is the 12 bar again, duration 3-4 days

III.Production gradient measurement during pull-out

New measurements in Well EN-E-14 to detect fluid loading

Performed:(started:2012. 12. 04. 07:30)I.Closed gradient measurement, immediately after complete fluid removal from the bottom, measurement frequency is 200 m, and 50 m near the bottomII.FBHP measurement in 3 steps

1. WHP is the usual 12 bar, until the stabilization of the flow

2. WHP is 5 bar, until the stabilization of the flow3. WHP is 5 bar, duration hours

III.Production gradient measurement during pull-out(Finished: 2012. 12. 06. 12:30)

-10

10

30

50

70

90

110

130

150

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a,

De

nsi

ty,

kg

/m3

Depth, m

Well# EN-E-14, closed gradient

Pressure

Density

Temperature

115

117

119

121

123

125

127

129

2000

2200

2400

2600

2800

3000

3200

3400

3600

3800

4000

4 9 14 19 24

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Time, hour

Well# - EN-E-14, FBHP measurement, WHP: 10-12 bar

Pressure

Temperature

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00

Pre

ssu

re

Flo

w r

ate

s

Time, hour

Well# - EN-E-14, Production data during FBHP measurement, WHP: 10-12 bar

Qg Ql

WHP FBHP

110

112

114

116

118

120

122

124

126

128

130

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

25 30 35 40 45 50

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Time, hour

Well# - EN-E-14, FBHP measurement, WHP: 5-8 bar

Pressure

Temperature

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00

Pre

ssu

re

Flo

w r

ate

Time, hour

Well# - EN-E-14, Production data during FBHP measurement, WHP: 5-8 bar

Qg Ql

WHP FBHP

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

oC

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

Well# -EN-E-14, flowing gradient

Pressure

Temperature

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

FB

HP,

ba

r

Gas flow rate, 1000 m3/day

IPR for Well# EN-E-14

IPR

Test

C=18.76 m3/day/bar2

n=0.9458

0 1 103× 2 10

3×0

2

4

6

8

10

0

50

100

150

200

Water contentWater content at FBHPWater content at WHPPressureTemperature

Well# EN-E-14, Calculated water saturatiun along the tubing

Depth, m

Wat

er c

onte

nt, W

%

Pre

ssur

e, T

empe

ratu

re

1.Closed gradient2.Flowing gradient #13.Continuous FBHP measurement#1:4.Flowing gradient#21.Continuous FBHP measurement#2

Until ceasing production or stabilisation of a minimal flow rate

5.Closed gradient

New program to show the water at the bottom

Qw

Qg

as,

Pse

p,

Tse

p,

Pw

f, T

wf

Time

Qgas Psep Tsep Pwf Twf Qw End of test:

19/06/2013 03:30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2000

2100

2200

2300

2400

2500

2600

2700

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

C

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

13/06/2013 9:46 - 15:45, closed

Pavg

Tavg

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

C

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

13/06/2013 15:45-20:15, flowing

Qw

Qg

as,

Pse

p,

Tse

p,

Pw

f, T

wf

Time

Qgas Psep Tsep Pwf Twf Qw End of test:

19/06/2013 03:30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

C

Pre

ssu

re,

Kp

a

Depth, m

15/06/2013 01:01:-5:35, flowing

Qw

Qg

as,

Pse

p,

Tse

p,

Pw

f, T

wf

Time

Qgas Psep Tsep Pwf Twf Qw End of test:

19/06/2013 03:30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

C

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

17/06/2013 7:50-11:00, after

compressor problem

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

C

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

17/06/2013 21:39-18/06/2013 02:09, flowing

Qw

Qg

as,

Pse

p,

Tse

p,

Pw

f, T

wf

Time

Qgas Psep Tsep Pwf Twf Qw End of test:

19/06/2013 03:30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2400

2450

2500

2550

2600

2650

2700

2750

2800

2850

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Tem

pe

ratu

re,

C

Pre

ssu

re,

kP

a

Depth, m

19/06/2013 7:40-12:56, closed

406 kg/m 3

SummarySummary

�� Identification of liquid loadingIdentification of liquid loading

•• Evaluate adequate dataEvaluate adequate data

�� MeasurementsMeasurements

�� Identification of loading typeIdentification of loading type

�� Determination of the way of liquid removalDetermination of the way of liquid removal

Well# Well# -- EN EN –– EE-- 1414

�� Loading is occurred at the upper part of Loading is occurred at the upper part of

tubingtubing

�� There There areare no possibilities to increase flow no possibilities to increase flow

raterate (from the terms of liquid removal)(from the terms of liquid removal)

�� Possible solution#1: heating the upper Possible solution#1: heating the upper

part of the tubing (Insulation is not part of the tubing (Insulation is not

enough)enough)

�� Possible solution#2:Using CT at the upper Possible solution#2:Using CT at the upper

1000 m of the tubing.1000 m of the tubing.

4949

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

3.5 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.375

Ga

s ra

te,

10

00

m3/d

ay

CT nominal size, in

Well# EN-E-14, Gas flow rate vs. CT size and length

All CT, Pwh 12 bar

1000 m CT, Pwh=12 bar

All CT, Pwh 6 bar

1000 m CT, Pwh=6 bar

5050

Thank You for Your Attention!