Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

    1/6

    Chapter 2

    Random Variables

    Lectures 4 - 7

    In many situations, one is interested in only some aspects of the random experiment. For example,

    consider the experiment of tossing unbiased coins and we are only interested in number of 'Heads'

    turned up. The probability space corresponding to the experiment of tossing coins is given by

    and is described by

    Our interest is in noting , i.e., in the map . So our

    nterest is only on certain function of the sample space. But all functions defined on the sample spaceare not useful, in the sense that we may not be able to assign probabilities to all basic events associatedwith the function. So one need to restrict to certain class of functions of the sample space. This

    motivates us to define random variables.

    Definition 2.1 Let be a probability space. A function is said to be a

    random variable if

    Now on, we denote by .

    Example 2.0.14 Let . Define as follows:

    Then is a random variable.

    Example 2.0.15 Let . Define .

    For

    Since

    is a random variable.

  • 7/27/2019 Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

    2/6

    Note that any map is a random variable for the probability space given in Example 2.0.14

    but this is not the case with probability space given in Example 2.0.15.

    is a random variable imply that the basic events associated are in . Does

    this imply a larger class of events associated with can be assigned probabilities (i.e. in ) ? To

    examine this, one need the following -field.

    Definition 2.2 The -field generated by the collection of all open sets in is called the Borel -field

    of subsets of and is denoted by .

    Lemma 2.0.2

    Let . Then

    Proof. For ,

    Therefore

    Hence

    For ,

    Therefore

    Also, for

    Therefore, contains all open intervals. Since any open set in can be written as a countable

    union of open intervals, it follows that

    where denote the set of all open sets in . Thus,

    This completes the proof.

    Theorem 2.0.3 Let be a function. Then is a random variable on iff

  • 7/27/2019 Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

    3/6

    for all .

    Proof. Suppose is a random variable. i.e.,

    (2.0.1)

    Set

    From (2.0.1), we have

    (2.0.2)

    Note that . Hence .

    Now

    Also

    Hence is a -field. Now from (2.0.2) and Lemma 2.0.1, it follows that . i.e,

    for all .

    Converse statement follows from the observation

    This completes the proof.

    Remark 2.0.1 Theorem 2.0.3 tells that if for all , then

    for all .

    Theorem 2.0.4 Let be a random variable. Define

    Then is a -field.

    Proof.

  • 7/27/2019 Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

    4/6

    Hence .

    For , there exists such that

    and

    Hence implies . Similarly from

    t follows that

    This completes the proof.

    Definition 2.3 The sigma field is called the sigma field generated by .

    Remark 2.0.2 The occurrence or nonoccurence of the event tells whether any realization

    is in or not. Thus collects all such information. Hence can be viewed as the

    nformation available with the random variable.

    Example 2.0.16 Let . Then

    Theorem 2.0.5 If are random variables on and , then

    and are random variables.

    Proof: The proof of first two are simple exercises.

    For ,

    [Here means ] Now

    Hence for all . Therefore is a random variable.

  • 7/27/2019 Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

    5/6

    For ,

    Hence, is a random variable.

    Note that

    Since are random variables and is their sum, is a random

    variable.

    Theorem 2.0.6

    (i) If are random variables, so are , .

    (ii) If is a sequence of random variables and

    Then is a random variable. Analogous statement is true for infimum.

    Proof:

    (i) Set . For ,

    Therefore is a random variable.

    The proof of is a random variable is similar.

    Proof of (ii) follows from

    Theorem 2.0.7 Let be a sequence of random variables on such that

    Then defined by

    s a random variable.

    Proof. For .

  • 7/27/2019 Maths Probability Random Variables lec2/8.pdf

    6/6

    Hence

    Now suppose

    If , then there exists there exists and such that

    (2.0.3)

    (This follows, since )

    Also

    This contradicts (2.0.3). Therefore

    Hence we have

    (2.0.4)

    Since and is a -field, using(2.0.4) it follows from the definition of -field

    that

    Therefore is a random variable.