Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez
School for Professional Studies
Florida Campuses
Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo
MATH 199
QUANTITATIVE METHODS I
METODOS CUANTITATIVOS I
© Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, 2006, 2008
Derechos Reservados.
© Ana G. Méndez University System, 2006, 2008. All rights reserved.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 2
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
TABLA DE CONTENIDO/TABLE OF CONTENTS
Página/Page
Prontuario ........................................................................................................................ 3
Study Guide .................................................................................................................. 12
Workshop One .............................................................................................................. 20
Taller Dos ...................................................................................................................... 25
Workshop Three ............................................................................................................ 29
Taller Cuatro ................................................................................................................. 33
Workshop Five/Taller Cinco .......................................................................................... 37
Anejo A/Appendix A ...................................................................................................... 43
Anejo B/Appendix B ...................................................................................................... 45
Anejo C/Appendix C ...................................................................................................... 50
Anejo D/Appendix D ...................................................................................................... 52
Anejo E/Appendix E ...................................................................................................... 53
Anejo F/Appendix F ....................................................................................................... 55
Anejo G/Appendix G...................................................................................................... 56
Anejo H/Appendix H ...................................................................................................... 57
Anejo I/Appendix I ......................................................................................................... 58
Anejo J/Appendix J........................................................................................................ 60
Anejo K/Appendix K ...................................................................................................... 61
Anejo L/Appendix L ....................................................................................................... 62
Anejo M/Appendix M ..................................................................................................... 63
Anejo N/Appendix N ...................................................................................................... 65
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 3
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Prontuario
Título del Curso Métodos Cuantitativos I
Codificación MATEMATICA 199
Duración Cinco Semanas
Prerrequisito MATEMATICA 121 o aprobación de prueba diagnóstica de
álgebra
Descripción
Curso dirigido a estudiantes de la Escuela de Administración de Empresas con un
enfoque hacia aplicaciones en los conceptos presentados y que mayormente se utilizan
en el comercio. Se estudian las funciones, desigualdades, sistemas de ecuaciones
lineales y sucesiones matemáticas. Se discute la representación gráfica y aplicaciones
de las funciones lineales, cuadráticas, exponenciales y logarítmicas comúnmente
utilizadas. Se presenta el uso de las funciones en la administración de empresas a
través de los conceptos financieros de interés simple, interés compuesto, valor
presente y valor futuro.
Matemática 199 capacitará al estudiante para utilizar efectivamente los principios y
conceptos del álgebra y el pre-cálculo, que frecuentemente se utilizan en procesos
cuantificables que contribuyen al proceso decisional de las empresas.
Objetivos Generales
1. Determinar la solución de ecuaciones utilizando las propiedades de las
igualdades.
2. Solucionar desigualdades lineales en una variable.
3. Hallar las soluciones de ecuaciones cuadráticas a través de diferentes métodos.
4. Identificar relaciones que sean funciones.
5. Definir y resolver diferentes tipos de funciones.
6. Aplicar el conocimiento de las funciones a situaciones cotidianas.
7. Trabajar con aplicaciones de funciones utilizadas en áreas de la administración
de empresas.
8. Resolver sistemas de ecuaciones lineales a través de los métodos mayormente
utilizados.
9. Solucionar ejercicios de aplicación con sistemas de ecuaciones lineales.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 4
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Texto y Recursos
Barnett, Raymond A., Ziegler, Michael R., (1995). Essentials of College
Mathematics. (3rd .ed.) New Jersey: McMillan.
Referencias y material suplementario:
Barnett, R. A., Ziegler, M. R., Byleen, K. E. (2007). College
Mathematics. (11th. ed.). Prentice Hall.
Barnett, Raymond A., Ziegler, Michael R., (1994). Applied Mathematics.
McGraw Hill.
Arya, Jagdish C., Lardner, Robin W., (2002). Matemáticas Aplicadas a la
administración y a la economía. (4ta. ed.) México: Prentice Hall.
Evaluación
1. Trabajos para realizar de cada taller 15%
Antes de cada taller el/la estudiante deberá completar ciertas tareas asignadas que
le ayudarán a prepararse para las actividades que se realizarán en el taller. Estas
constarán de la búsqueda en la Internet sobre información básica conceptual
provista en el modulo que le ayudará en el proceso de comprensión de los temas
bajo estudio. En adicion, el/la estudiante deberá completar una variedad de
ejercicios y preguntas guías que le ayudarán en el proceso de comprensión de
conceptos que se desarrollan en la práctica de las actividades que se efectuaron en
el taller. Los mismos, constarán de una selección de ejercicios asignados por el
facilitador. El/La estudiante deberá incluir el procedimiento que utilizo para llegar a
los resultados de los ejercicios asignados. Si el procedimiento no es incluido, no se
le dara credito completo por el ejercicio aunque el resultado sea correcto. Estas
tareas deberán entregarse a partir de la primera reunión. Este es un trabajo
individual; no se aceptaran copias del Internet o de las direcciones electrónicas
utilizadas. (Ver Anejo A: Política de Honestidad Académica) . Cada trabajo tiene
un valor de 100 puntos para un total agregado de 500 puntos. La evaluación de
estas tareas estará dividida en 70% por contenido y 30% por objetivos de lenguaje.
(Ver Anejo B: Rúbrica para evaluar tareas previas a los talleres) . El/la
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 5
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
estudiante que entregue la tarea posterior al taller asignado tendrá un descuento de
20 puntos por cada reunión que pase posterior a la fecha de entrega.
2. Cuatro (4) trabajos cooperativos 15%
De la primera a la cuarta reuniión, el/la estudiante tendrá la oportunidad de trabajar
en grupo con diferentes compañeros matriculados en el curso MATH 199. El
facilitador estará a cargo de incorporar los grupos en cada uno de los talleres. Cada
grupo trabajará una situación asignada que se resolverá y presentará en la clase.
La solución del trabajo se entregará al finalizar el tiempo provisto por el facilitador
con el nombre de todos los participantes por grupo. Habrá cuatro (4) trabajos
cooperativos a partir del Taller Uno, cada uno de ellos con un valor de 100 puntos
para un total agregado de 400 puntos. En la quinta reunión no se realizará esta
actividad ya que habra un trabajo final cooperativo (debate/concurso). (Ver Anejo
C: Rúbrica para evaluar trabajo en grupo) .
3. Cuatro (4) pruebas para realizar en los talleres 20%
A partir de la segunda reunión y hasta el último taller, al principio de cada taller se
dará una prueba corta sobre el material discutido en el taller anterior. Luego de
haber asistido al taller anterior, haber completado la tarea asignadas y haber
participado en el trabajo cooperativo, el/la estudiante estará capacitado para
contestar esta prueba. La misma constará de una selección de ejercicios prácticos
que fortalecerán las destrezas y conceptos presentados. Estas pruebas tendrán un
valor de 100 puntos cada una para un total agregado de 400 puntos.
4. Trabajo Final: Ejercicio Cooperativo (Debate/Concu rso) 25%
Durante el quinto taller, se llevará a cabo un ejercicio cooperativo (debate-
concurso). Éste, será un trabajo en grupo. Sin embargo, la evaluación considerará
ambas variables de desempeño: individual y grupal. Dependiendo de la cantidad de
estudiantes matriculados en el curso, el facilitador seleccionará aleatoreamente
hasta un máximo de seis (6) grupos cuya composición no excederá cinco (5)
estudiantes por grupo. Cada uno de los grupos tendrá la oportunidad de contestar
ejercicios prácticos de los temas que se han facilitado en los talleres. Esta actividad
tiene un valor de 100 puntos. El facilitador informará la composición de los grupos al
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 6
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
comienzo del quinto taller. (Ver Anejo D: Rúbrica para la evaluación del trabajo
cooperativo final).
5. Portafolio 10%
En el quinto taller, los estudiantes entregarán un portafolio. (Ver Anejo E:
Portafolio). Este trabajo tiene un valor de 100 puntos y se realizará individualmente
(Ver Anejo F: Rúbrica para la evaluación del Portaf olio). El facilitador informara
durante el taller uno cuáles serán los trabajos asignados que se incluirán en el
portafolio. Las actividades efectuadas en cada uno de los talleres, brindarán las
destrezas necesarias para que el estudiante pueda desarrollar el portafolio.
6. Asistencia y participación 15%
La asistencia a todos los talleres es necesaria e indispensable, dos o más
ausencias equivalen a fracaso del curso. El/la estudiante deberá demostrar
responsabilidad por su proceso de aprendizaje y deberá siempre traer los
materiales asignados. En caso de ausencia, el/la estudiante debe realizar todas las
gestiones necesarias para comunicarse con el facilitador, de manera que pueda
prepararse adecuadamente para la próxima reunión. Todas las actividades
realizadas en el taller ausente, sujetas a evaluación, serán consideradas y
ponderadas de acuerdo con los parámetros específicos. Es decir, es vigente la
pérdida de puntuación por cada trabajo del cual no fue partícipe el/la estudiante por
causa de la ausencia. (Ver Anejo G: Parámetros Específicos para Evaluar
Asistencia y Participación).
7. Escala de evaluación:
La evaluación final se calculará a base de promedios ponderados, pero
considerando la escala estándar de porcientos.
Nota A B C D F
Porciento 100-90 89-80 70-79 60-69 59-0
NOTA:
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 7
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
El estudiante debe obtener una calculadora científica , ya que es una de las
herramientas principales para poder realizar eficientemente las tareas y actividades
provistas para cada taller.
Descripción de las normas del curso
1. Este curso sigue el programa “Discipline-Based Dual Language Immersion
Model®” del Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, el mismo esta diseñado para
promover el desarrollo de cada estudiante como un profesional bilingüe. Cada
taller será facilitado en inglés y español, utilizando el modelo 50/50. Esto
significa que cada taller deberá ser conducido enteramente en el lenguaje
especificado. Los lenguajes serán alternados en cada taller para asegurar que
el curso se ofrece 50% en inglés y 50% en español. Para mantener un balance,
el módulo debe especificar que se utilizarán ambos idiomas en el quinto taller,
dividiendo el tiempo y las actividades equitativamente entre ambos idiomas. Si
un estudiante tiene dificultad en hacer una pregunta en el idioma especificado,
bien puede escoger el idioma de preferencia para hacer la pregunta. Sin
embargo, el facilitador deberá contestar la misma en el idioma designado para
ese taller. Esto deberá ser una excepción a las reglas pues es importante que
los estudiantes utilicen el idioma designado. Esto no aplica a los cursos de
lenguaje que deben ser desarrollados en el idioma propio todo en inglés o todo
en español según aplique.
2. El curso es conducido en formato acelerado, eso requiere que los estudiantes se
preparen antes de cada taller de acuerdo al módulo. Cada taller requiere un
promedio de diez (10) horas de preparación y en ocasiones requiere más.
3. La asistencia a todos los talleres es obligatoria. El estudiante que se ausente al
taller deberá presentar una excusa razonable al facilitador. El facilitador
evaluará si la ausencia es justificada y decidirá como el estudiante repondrá el
trabajo perdido, de ser necesario. El facilitador decidirá uno de los siguientes:
permitirle al estudiante reponer el trabajo o asignarle trabajo adicional en
adición al trabajo a ser repuesto.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 8
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Toda tarea a ser completada antes del taller deberá ser entregada en la fecha
asignada. El facilitador ajustará la nota de las tareas repuestas.
4. Si un estudiante se ausenta a más de un taller el facilitador tendrá las siguientes
opciones:
a. Si es a dos talleres, el facilitador reducirá una nota por debajo basado en
la nota existente.
b. Si el estudiante se ausenta a tres talleres, el facilitador reducirá la nota a
dos por debajo de la nota existente.
5. La asistencia y participación en clase de actividades y presentaciones orales es
extremadamente importante pues no se pueden reponer. Si el estudiante provee
una excusa válida y verificable, el facilitador determinará una actividad
equivalente a evaluar que sustituya la misma. Esta actividad deberá incluir el
mismo contenido y componentes del lenguaje como la presentación oral o
actividad a ser repuesta.
6. En actividades de grupo el grupo será evaluado por su trabajo final. Sin
embargo, cada miembro de grupo deberá participar y cooperar para lograr un
trabajo de excelencia, pero recibirán una calificación individual.
7. Se espera que todo trabajo escrito sea de la autoría de cada estudiante y no
plagiado. Se debe entender que todo trabajo sometido esta citado
apropiadamente o parafraseado y citado dando atención al autor. Todo
estudiante debe ser el autor de su propio trabajo. Todo trabajo que sea plagiado,
copiado o presente trazos de otro será calificado con cero (vea la política de
honestidad académica).
8. Si el facilitador hace cambios al módulo o guía de estudio, deberá discutirlos y
entregar copia a los estudiantes por escrito al principio del primer taller.
9. El facilitador establecerá los medios para contactar a los estudiantes proveyendo
su correo electrónico, teléfonos, y el horario disponibles.
10. EL uso de celulares esta prohibido durante las sesiones de clase; de haber una
necesidad, deberá permanecer en vibración o en silencio.
11. La visita de niños y familiares no registrados en el curso no está permitida en el
salón de clases.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 9
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
12. Todo estudiante esta sujeto a las políticas y normas de conducta y
comportamiento que rigen al SUAGM y el curso.
Nota: Si por alguna razón no puede acceder las dire cciones electrónicas
ofrecidas en el módulo, no se limite a ellas. Exis ten otros “web sites” que podrá
utilizar para la búsqueda de la información deseada . Entre ellas están:
• www.google.com
• www.altavista.com
• www.ask.com
• www.excite.com
• www.pregunta.com
• www.findarticles.com
• www.telemundo.yahoo.com
• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu
• www.eric.ed.gov/
• www.flelibrary.org/
El facilitador puede realizar cambios a las direcci ones electrónicas y/o añadir
algunas de ser necesario.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 10
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Filosofía y Metodología Educativa
Este curso está basado en la teoría educativa del Constructivismo.
Constructivismo es una filosofía de aprendizaje fundamentada en la premisa, de que,
reflexionando a través de nuestras experiencias, podemos construir nuestro propio
conocimiento sobre el mundo en el que vivimos.
Cada uno de nosotros genera nuestras propias “reglas “y “métodos mentales”
que utilizamos para darle sentido a nuestras experiencias. Aprender, por lo tanto, es
simplemente el proceso de ajustar nuestros modelos mentales para poder acomodar
nuevas experiencias. Como facilitadores, nuestro enfoque es el mantener una
conexión entre los hechos y fomentar un nuevo entendimiento en los estudiantes.
También, intentamos adaptar nuestras estrategias de enseñanza a las respuestas de
nuestros estudiantes y motivar a los mismos a analizar, interpretar y predecir
información. Existen varios principios para el constructivismo, entre los cuales están:
1. El aprendizaje es una búsqueda de significados. Por lo tanto, el aprendizaje debe
comenzar con situaciones en las cuales los estudiantes estén buscando
activamente construir un significado.
2. Significado requiere comprender todas las partes. Y, las partes deben entenderse
en el contexto del todo. Por lo tanto, el proceso de aprendizaje se enfoca en los
conceptos primarios, no en hechos aislados.
3. Para enseñar bien, debemos entender los modelos mentales que los estudiantes
utilizan para percibir el mundo y las presunciones que ellos hacen para apoyar
dichos modelos.
4. El propósito del aprendizaje, es para un individuo, el construir su propio significado,
no sólo memorizar las contestaciones “correctas” y repetir el significado de otra
persona. Como la educación es intrínsicamente interdisciplinaria, la única forma
válida para asegurar el aprendizaje es hacer del avalúo parte esencial de dicho
proceso, asegurando que el mismo provea a los estudiantes con la información
sobre la calidad de su aprendizaje.
5. La evaluación debe servir como una herramienta de auto-análisis.
6. Proveer herramientas y ambientes que ayuden a los estudiantes a interpretar las
múltiples perspectivas que existen en el mundo.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 11
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
7. El aprendizaje debe ser controlado internamente y analizado por el estudiante.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 12
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Study Guide
Course Title Quantitative Methods I
Code : MATH 199
Time Length Five Weeks
Prerequisite MATH 121 or diagnostic test in algebra.
Description
Course for students of Business Administration with emphasis in applications of
concepts primarily used in the commercial workplace. Studies functions, inequalities,
systems of linear equations, and mathematical series. Graphical representation and
applications of most frequently used functions in business such as: lineal, quadratic,
exponential and logarithmic functions. Applications to finance presented through the
concepts of simple interest, compound interest, future value, and present value.
MATH 199 will enable and qualify the student to effectively use principles and
concepts of algebra and pre-calculus mostly used in quantitative thinking contributing to
the decisional processes given in areas of business administration.
General Objectives
1. Determine the solution of an equation in one variable using the properties of
equations.
2. Solve linear inequalities in one variable.
3. Find solutions to quadratic equations through different methods.
4. Identify relations that are functions.
5. Define and solve different functions.
6. Solve applied exercises involving functions.
7. Solve systems of linear equations through commonly used methods.
8. Solve applied exercises with systems of linear equations.
Texts and Resources
Barnett, Raymond A., Ziegler, Michael R. (1995). Essentials of College Mathematics.
(3rd .ed.) New Jersey: MacMillan.
References and Supplementary Materials:
Barnett, R. A., Ziegler, M. R., Byleen, K. E. (2007). College
Mathematics. (11th. ed.). Prentice Hall.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 13
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Bittinger, Marvin L. (2000). Intermediate Algebra, Alternative Version.
(8th .ed.). Addison Wesley.
Arya, Jagdish C., Lardner, Robin W. (2002). Matemáticas Aplicadas a la
administración y a la economía. (4ta. ed.) México: Prentice Hall.
Evaluation
1. Assignment to do previous to each workshop 15%
Previous to each workshop students must finish certain assignments that will help
them to prepare for the activities in the workshop. The assignments will consist of
Internet sites research related of basic conceptual information provided in the
module that will help the learning of the workshop objectives. Additionally, the
student will complete the assigned exercises that will help him/her in the learning
process to understand and apply specific concepts that will be developed in the
activities at each workshop. These exercises are a selection of problems selected by
the facilitator. The student must include the procedures utilized to obtain the results
of the assigned problems. If the procedure is not included, there will be no full credit
to the assigned problem even if the result is correct. The assignments must be
submitted starting at the first meeting. This must be an individual work; copies from
the internet or from the URLs used will not be accepted. (See Appendix A:
Academic Honesty Policy) . Each assignment will be worth one hundred (100)
points for an accumulated score of five hundred (500) points. The evaluation of
these assignments will be 70% for content and 30% for language objectives. (See
Appendix B: Rubrics to evaluate assignments prior t o the workshops) . The
students that turn in the assignments after the corresponding workshop will have a
deduction of 20 points per each workshop that passes before the assignment is
turned in.
2. Collaborative Exercises (4) 15%
Collaborative exercises will be given from workshop one until workshop four. The
student will have the opportunity to work with other students registered in the course
MATH 199. The facilitator will select randomly the students to form each group.
Each group will work a situation that will be discussed and presented in the
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 14
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
workshop. The solution to this exercise will be handled out to the facilitator at the
end of the activity with all the names of the members of the team. Each of these
assignments will be worth one hundred (100) points for an accumulated score of four
hundred (400) points. This activity will not be done in workshop five since the
students will do a final collaborative exercise (debate/contest). (See Appendix C:
Rubric to evaluate group work).
3. Workshop tests (4) 20%
From Workshop 2 until Workshop 5, at the beginning of each workshop a short test
will be given about the material covered in the previous workshop. After attending
the previous workshop, completing the assignments and participating in the
collaborative exercise, the student will be able to answer this test. It will include a
selection of practical exercises to reinforce the analyzed skills and concepts already
studied. Each test will be worth one hundred (100) points for an accumulated score
of four hundred (400) points.
4. Final Exercise: Collaborative Exercise (Debate/Con test) 25%
During workshop 5, a collaborative exercise (Debate-Contest) will be held. It will
require team work. However, the assessment will consider both, individual and
group performance appraisal. Based upon the number of students registered in this
course, the facilitator will select at random a maximum of six (6) groups with no more
of five (5) students in each group. Each team will have the opportunity to answer
applications and practical exercises related to concepts that were presented in
previous workshops. The activity will have a value of 100 point. The facilitator will
inform the student his/her group assignment at the beginning of Workshop 5. (See
Appendix D: Rubric for evaluation of the final coll aborative work).
5. Portfolio 10%
I workshop five, the students will turn in a portfolio. (See Appendix E: Portfolio) .
This activity will be done individually and will be worth one hundred (100) points
(See Appendix F: Rubric for Portfolio evaluation). During workshop one the
facilitator will inform the students the assigned work to be included in the portfolio.
The activities conducted in each workshop will provide the students the skill and
knowledge necessary to do the portfolio.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 15
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
6. Attendance and Participation 15%
Attendance to workshops is mandatory; with two or more absences the students will
fail the class. The student should show responsibility for the learning process and
must complete all assigned work. In case of absence, the student must
communicate with the facilitator, in order to be ready for the next workshop. All
classroom activities done in his/her absence will be subject to an evaluation based
upon specific parameters. In other words, absenteeism will produce loss of points.
(See Appendix G: Specific parameters to evaluate at tendance and
participation).
7. Scale:
Final grade to be calculated based on percentages.
Grade A B C D F
Percentage 100-90 89-80 70-79 60-69 59-0
NOTE:
A scientific calculator is recommended, since it is an essential tool to better and
efficiently perform assignments and activities to be presented and discussed in each
workshop.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 16
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Description of course policies
1. This course follows the Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Discipline-Based Dual
Language Immersion Model® designed to promote each student’s development as a
Dual Language Professional. Workshops will be facilitated in English and Spanish,
strictly using the 50/50 model. This means that each workshop will be conducted
entirely in the language specified. The language used in the workshops will
alternate to insure that 50% of the course will be conducted in English and 50% in
Spanish. To maintain this balance, the course module may specify that both
languages will be used during the fifth workshop, dividing that workshop’s time and
activities between the two languages. If students have difficulty with asking a
question in the target language in which the activity is being conducted, students
may choose to use their preferred language for that particular question. However,
the facilitator must answer in the language assigned for that particular day. This
should only be an exception as it is important for students to use the assigned
language. The 50/50 model does not apply to language courses where the delivery
of instruction must be conducted in the language taught (Spanish or English only).
2. The course is conducted in an accelerated format and requires that students prepare
in advance for each workshop according to the course module. Each workshop
requires an average ten hours of preparation but could require more.
3. Attendance at all class sessions is mandatory. A student that is absent to a
workshop must present the facilitator a reasonable excuse. The facilitator will
evaluate if the absence is justified and decide how the student will make up the
missing work, if applicable. The facilitator will decide on the following: allow the
student to make up the work, or allow the student to make up the work and assign
extra work to compensate for the missing class time.
Assignments required prior to the workshop must be completed and turned in on the
assigned date. The facilitator may decide to adjust the grade given for late
assignments and make-up work.
4. If a student is absent to more than one workshop the facilitator will have the
following options:
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 17
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
a. If a student misses two workshops, the facilitator may lower one grade based
on the students existing grade.
b. If the student misses three workshops, the facilitator may lower two grades
based on the students existing grade.
5. Student attendance and participation in oral presentations and special class
activities are extremely important as it is not possible to assure that they can be
made up. If the student provides a valid and verifiable excuse, the facilitator may
determine a substitute evaluation activity if he/she understands that an equivalent
activity is possible. This activity must include the same content and language
components as the oral presentation or special activity that was missed.
6. In cooperative activities the group will be assessed for their final work. However,
each member will have to collaborate to assure the success of the group and the
assessment will be done collectively as well as individually.
7. It is expected that all written work will be solely that of the student and should not be
plagiarized. That is, the student must be the author of all work submitted. All quoted
or paraphrased material must be properly cited, with credit given to its author or
publisher. It should be noted that plagiarized writings are easily detectable and
students should not risk losing credit for material that is clearly not their own (see
Academic Honesty Policy).
8. If the Facilitator makes changes to the study guide, such changes should be
discussed with and given to students in writing at the beginning of the first workshop.
9. The facilitator will establish a means of contacting students by providing an email
address, phone number, hours to be contacted and days.
10. The use of cellular phones is prohibited during sessions; if there is a need to have
one, it must be on vibrate or silent mode during class session.
11. Children or family members that are not registered in the course are not allowed to
the classrooms.
12. All students are subject to the policies regarding behavior in the university
community established by the institution and in this course.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 18
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Note: If for any reason you cannot access the URL’s presented in the module, do
not stop your investigation. There are many search engines and other links you
can use to search for information. These are some examples:
• www.google.com
• www.altavista.com
• www.ask.com
• www.excite.com
• www.pregunta.com
• www.findarticles.com
• www.telemundo.yahoo.com
• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu
• www.eric.ed.gov/
• www.flelibrary.org/
The facilitator may make changes and add additional web resources if deemed
necessary.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 19
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Teaching Philosophy and Methodology
This course is grounded in the learning theory of Constructivism. Constructivism
is a philosophy of learning founded on the premise that, by reflecting on our
experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world in which we live.
Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make
sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply the process of adjusting our
mental models to accommodate new experiences. As teachers, our focus is on making
connections between facts and fostering new understanding in students. We will also
attempt to tailor our teaching strategies to student responses and encourage students to
analyze, interpret and predict information.
There are several guiding principles of constructivism:
1. Learning is a search for meaning. Therefore, learning must start with the issues
around which students are actively trying to construct meaning.
2. Meaning requires understanding wholes as well as parts. And parts must be
understood in the context of wholes. Therefore, the learning process focuses on
primary concepts, not isolated facts.
3. In order to teach well, we must understand the mental models that students use to
perceive the world and the assumptions they make to support those models.
4. The purpose of learning is for an individual to construct his or her own meaning, not
just memorize the "right" answers and regurgitate someone else's meaning. Since
education is inherently interdisciplinary, the only valuable way to measure learning is
to make the assessment part of the learning process, ensuring it provides students
with information on the quality of their learning.
5. Evaluation should serve as a self-analysis tool.
6. Provide tools and environments that help learners interpret the multiple perspectives
of the world.
7. Learning should be internally controlled and mediated by the learner.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 20
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Workshop One
Specific Objectives
At the end of this workshop, the student:
1. Solve linear equations in one variable using the addition and multiplication
properties.
2. Solve application problems by translating a verbal situation into a linear equation
in one variable.
3. Solve linear inequalities in one variable using the addition and multiplication
properties.
4. Express in interval notation the solution set for a linear inequality.
5. Solve application problems in the area of business administration by translating a
verbal situation into a linear inequality in one variable.
6. Solve quadratic equations using the following methods; square root, factorization
and quadratic formula.
7. Solve application problems in the area of finance and economy using quadratic
equations.
8. Create the graph for a linear equation in two variables.
9. Determine the slope of a line.
10. Determine the intercept of a linear equation in two variables.
11. Write the equation of a line if the slope and the Y-intercept are known.
12. Determine the equation of a line if the slope and one point in the line are known.
13. Determine the equation of a line if two points in the line are known.
14. Define a Function and identify if a line in a graph is for a function.
15. Utilize the function notation to solve problems.
16. Define and identify the domain and range of a function.
17. Draw the graphs for linear and quadratic functions.
18. Solve application problems in the area of business administration with linear and
quadratic functions.
Language Objectives
1. Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow
of ideas)
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 21
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
2. Uses grammar appropriately and correctly.
3. Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly.
URLs
These sites offer examples and information about linear equations in one and two
variables, inequalities, quadratic equations, equation of a line, slope and functions.
http://www.analyzemath.com/
http://archives.math.utk.edu/topics/algebra.html
http://www.phschool.com/math/awsm/algebra/index.html
http://www.math.armstrong.edu/MathTutorial/index.html
http://math.rice.edu/~lanius/Algebra/hottub.html
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/ineqsolv.htm
http://www.math.com/school/subject2/lessons/S2U3L4GL.html
http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/quadraticeq/bdef/bdef.html
http://www.themathpage.com/alg/quadratic-equations.htm
http://www.mathsisfun.com/equation_of_line.html
http://www.math.com/school/subject2/lessons/S2U4L2GL.html
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/fcnnot.htm
Assignments before Workshop One
1. The students will search information and examples about the objectives for
workshop one on the recommended textbooks and/or on the Internet, or any other
bibliographic textbooks.
2. After reading about the objectives in workshop one, the students will define the
following terms and will provide examples. This must be an individual work; copies
from the internet or from the URLs used will not be accepted. (See Appendix A:
Academic Honesty Policy).
a. Linear equation
b. Linear Inequality
c. Quadratic equation
d. Graphs
e. Cartesian system and its relation with linear and quadratic equations
f. Slope of a line
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 22
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
g. Linear and Quadratic Functions
3. After searching the terms in part two above, the students will answer the following
questions as part of the assignment. Again, this must be an individual work; copies
from the internet or from the URLs used will not be accepted. (See Appendix A:
Academic Honesty Policy).
A. Consider the following equations:
a. 3 + 4 = 7
b. 5 – 1 = 2
c. 21 + 2 = 24
d. x – 5 = 12
e. 9 – x = x
f. 13 + 2 = 15
Which equatioons are true?
Which equations are false?
Which equations are neither true nor false?
B. Explain what is established by the addition and multiplication properties when
solving linear equations?
C. Explain why do we need to invert the inequality sign every time we divide or
multiply both sides of the inequality by a negative number?
D. Explain what does the slope describe in a line?
E. How can you determine if a graph is a function?
F. What is the relationship between functions and equations?
G. What are the general steps to construct a graph for an equation or a function?
4. This assignment shall be turn in to the facilitator and shall be properly identified with
the student name, date and workshop. This assignment is worth 100 points; the
evaluation of this assignment will be 70% for content and 30% for language
objectives. (See Appendix B: Rubrics to evaluate assignments p rior to the
workshops).
Activities
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 23
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
1. The facilitator will present and explain the objectives, the teaching methodology, and
the evaluation criteria for MATH 199. During this process, the facilitator will verify
that every student in the class has been registered in order to take this course.
Furthermore, the facilitator will review that every student has the module and the
textbook. Also, the facilitator will provide his/her contact information in case of
students need to contact him/her. The facilitator will establish the schedule and days
of contact.
2. The facilitator may conduct an ice breaking exercise to have the students introduce
them self. After all the students have been presented, a Student Representative will
be selected. Also, the facilitator will inform about other issues or announcements
such as new coming courses, holidays, and dates of the Student Representative
meeting.
3. The facilitator will discuss what should be included in a portfolio and what should be
included in it. The facilitator will provide specific information about the work to be
included in the portfolio and the rubrics for the portfolio evaluation. The facilitator will
answer any questions the students may have related to the portfolio.
4. Assignment to be completed before workshop one: The student will submit the
assignment to the facilitator. The facilitator will clarify any doubts and will answer any
questions the student’s may have regarding the assignment.
5. The facilitator will discuss the material related to the objectives in workshop one and
may provide and discuss some practice problems during the workshop. The
facilitator will discuss the terms and provide examples that will help the learning
process and the application of these terms.
6. The facilitator will provide additional problems for the students to practice the
procedures associated with the solution of application problems. These problems will
allow the students to clarify any questions and to improve their skills and knowledge
in the workshop material.
7. Collaborative Exercise: After completion of the previous activities the facilitator will
divide the class in groups of three to five students. Each group will work the
collaborative exercise (see Appendix N ). A speaker will be selected in each group.
The facilitator will let the students know how much time they have to solve the
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 24
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
problem. The solution will be turn in to the facilitator on a piece of paper with the
name of all the members of the group. (See Appendix C: Rubric to evaluate
group work)
8. The facilitator will select one group and asked them to solve and present results of
the collaborative exercise. Each group will have the opportunity to discuss their
solution if different from the solution presented by the first group.
9. The facilitator will discuss the assignment to be completed before workshop two.
Also, the facilitator will provide a list of problems to be included as part of the
assignment before workshop two.
Assessment
Rubric to evaluate group work.
Short Test: There will not be a short test in Workshop One. The test for the material
discussed in Workshop 1 will be administered at the beginning of Workshop Two.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 25
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Taller Dos
Objetivos Específicos
Al finalizar el Taller, el estudiante:
1. Definir e indenticar una función exponencial.
2. Hacer la gráfica de ecuaciones y funciones exponenciales.
3. Aplicar las propiedades de las funciones exponenciales.
4. Definir y aplicar funciones exponenciales con base ℮.
5. Resolver ecuaciones exponenciales.
6. Convertir de notación exponencial a notacion logarítmica y viceversa.
7. Definir e identificar funciones logarítmicas.
8. Identificar y aplicar las propiedades de las funciones logarítmicas.
9. Resolver ecuaciones logarítmicas.
10. Evaluar exponentes y logaritmos utilizando la calculadora.
Objetivos de Lenguaje
1. Demostrar dominio del idioma Español (vocabulario, sintaxis, presentación de
ideas).
2. Utilización apropiada y correcta de gramática.
3. Aplicación y utilización correcta y apropiada de los verbos.
Direcciones Electrónicas
En estos sitios los estudiantes podrán encontrar información sobre funciones
exponenciales y logarítmicas.
http://www.ping.be/~ping1339/exp.htm
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/2426/
http://www.analyzemath.com/
http://archives.math.utk.edu/topics/algebra.html
http://www.phschool.com/math/awsm/algebra/index.html
http://w3.cnice.mec.es/Descartes/Bach_CNST_1/Funcion_exponencial/Func-exp.htm
http://huitoto.udea.edu.co/Matematicas/2.1.html
http://netlizama.usach.cl/avcapituloVI.pdf
http://personal5.iddeo.es/ztt/Tem/T3_Funcion_Logaritmica.htm
http://w3.cnice.mec.es/Descartes/Bach_CNST_1/Funcion_logaritmica/Func-log.htm
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 26
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Tareas a realizar antes del Taller Dos
1. El/la estudiante leerá y buscará información relacionadas a los objetivos del taller
dos en los libros de texto recomendados o en direcciones electrónicas o cualquier
otra referencia bibliográfica.
2. Una vez realice la lectura, los estudiantes contestarán las siguientes preguntas.
Este es un trabajo individual; no se aceptarán copias del Internet o de las
direcciones electrónicas utilizadas. (Ver Anejo A: Honestidad Académica).
• Definir exponentes, dar ejemplos
• Definir funcion exponencial y listar las propiedades de exponentes
• Definir que es una función exponencial con base e
• Definir función logarítmicas y listar las propiedades de logaritmos
• Dar tres (3) ejemplos de funciones exponenciales utilizadas en
administración de empresas.
3. El facilitador asignará problemas adicionales del libro de texto como parte de esta
tarea para entregar. Estos problemas ayudarán a los estudiantes a entender los
objetivos del taller. Este es un trabajo individual; no se aceptarán copias del Internet
o de las direcciones electrónicas utilizadas. (Ver Anejo A: Honestidad
Académica).
4. Esta tarea deberá entregarla al facilitador debidamente identificada con su nombre,
fecha y taller. La misma tiene un valor de 100 puntos. La evaluación de esta tarea
estará dividida en 70% por contenido y 30% por objetivos de lenguaje. (Ver anejo
B: Matriz valorativa para tareas previas a los tall eres).
Actividades
1. El facilitador devolverá los trabajos completados por los estudiantes durante el taller
uno (Tarea y Trabajo Cooperativo). Estos trabajos estarán evaluados de acuerdo
con las matrices incluidas en el módulo. El facilitador discutirá la puntuación
obtenida con los estudiantes según sea necesario. El facilitador contestará cualquier
pregunta que los estudiantes tengan en relación a los trabajos del taller uno. Estos
trabajos serán incluidos en el Portafolio el cual sera entregado en el taller cinco.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 27
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
2. Trabajo para realizar previo al Taller Dos : El/la estudiante entregará la tarea
asignada. El facilitador contestará preguntas relacionadas a la tarea y aclarará
todas las dudas que los estudiantes tengan.
3. Prueba corta: Al comienzo del taller los estudiantes tomarán una prueba corta
sobre el material discutido en el taller anterior. Luego de haber asistido al taller
anterior, participar en las actividades del taller y haber hecho la tarea a entregar, los
estudiantes estarán capacitados para contestar esta prueba.
4. El facilitador discutirá en la clase el material relacionado a los objetivos del taller y
podrá asignar o hacer algunos problemas de práctica durante el taller. Estos
problemas ayudarán a los estudiantes a aclarar dudas y contestar cualquier
pregunta que tengan lo cual los ayudará a mejorar su conocimiento y destrezas
referentes al material de la clase.
5. El facilitador dará problemas adicionales para que los estudiantes los resuelvan en
clase para practicar los procedimientos associados con la solución de los mismos.
Estos problemas ayudarán a los estudiantes a clarificar cualquier duda o pregunta
que tengan, tambien los ayudara a mejorar el conocimiento sobre el material
discutido en el taller.
6. Trabajo cooperativo : Luego de termian las actividades anteriores, el facilitador
dividirá la clase en grupos de tres a cinco estudiantes dependiendo del tamano de la
clase. Cada grupo trabajará el siguiente ejercicio. El facilitador les dirá a los
estudiantes cuanto tiempo tienen para resolver el problema. La solución será
entregada en una hoja de papel con los nombres de los miembros del grupo. (Ver
Anejo N para ejercicio y Anejo C: Matriz valorativa para trabajo en grupo).
(Nota : El facilitador puede asignar otro trabajo cooperativo diferente al que está en el
módulo. Si el trabajo cooperativo es cambiado, el facilitador debe notificar al los
estudiantes del cambio en el taller anterior)
7. El facilitador discutirá la tarea que los estudiantes deben completer antes del
próximo taller. En adición, el facilitador proveerá una lista de los problemas a
resolver como parte de la tarea a entregar en el taller tres.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 28
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Avalúo
Prueba corta : Los estudiantes tomarán una prueba corta al inicio del taller sobre el
material del taller anterior.
Matriz valorativa para trabajo en grupo .
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 29
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Workshop Three
Specific Objectives
At the end of this workshop, the student:
1. Define and understand the following terms:
a. Simple interest
b. Compound interest
c. Principal
d. Annual Interest Rate
e. Payment period
f. Annuity
g. Ordinary Annuity
h. Amortization
i. Future Value of an Annuity
j. Present Value of an Annuity
2. Recognize and use the formulas and equations for simple interest, compound
interest, future value and present value of an annuity.
3. Calculate the effective interest rate using a scientific or accounting calculator.
4. Obtain the future value or present value of an annuity using a scientific or
accounting calculator
5. Create an amortization table to amortize a loan and determine the amount of
interests paid and the final loan amount paid.
Language Objectives
1. Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow of
ideas)
2. Uses grammar appropriately and correctly.
3. Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly.
Electronic Links (URLs)
These sites offer examples and information about Financial Mathematics.
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/applets/Interest/Interest.html
http://www.getobjects.com/Components/Finance/TVM/iy.html
http://banking.about.com/od/loans/a/simpleinterest.htm
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 30
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
http://math.about.com/library/weekly/aa042002a.htm
http://math2.org/math/general/interest.htm
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/annuity.asp
http://www.investorwords.com/200/amortization.html
http://banking.about.com/od/loans/g/amortization.htm
http://www.getobjects.com/Components/Finance/TVM/fva.html
http://www.getobjects.com/Components/Finance/TVM/pva.html
Assignments before Workshop Three
1. The students will search information and examples about the objectives for
workshop three on the recommended textbooks and/or on the Internet, or any other
bibliographic textbooks.
2. After reading about the objectives in workshop three, the students will define and
provide examples about the following terms. Defining these terms will help the
students understand the objectives of the workshop. This must be an individual
work; copies from the internet or from the URLs used will not be accepted (see
Appendix A: Academic Honesty).
a. Simple interest
b. Compound interest
c. Loan Principal
d. Annual Interest Rate
e. Annuity
f. Ordinary Annuity
g. Amortization
h. Future Value of an Annuity
i. Present Value of an Annuity
3. The facilitator will assign additional problems from the textbook as part of this
assignment. These problems will help the students understand the terms and
objectives of this workshop. This must be an individual work; copies from the internet
or from the URLs used will not be accepted (See Appendix A: Academic
Honesty).
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 31
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
4. This assignment shall be turn in to the facilitator and shall be properly identified with
the student name, date and workshop. This assignment is worth 100 points; the
evaluation of this assignment will be 70% for content and 30% for language
objectives. (See Appendix B: Rubrics to evaluate assignments pr ior to the
workshops).
5. In addition, the students will search in the newspaper and/or magazine for an article
about compound interests or any other term/concept to be discussed in workshop
three. The students must be prepared to discuss their article in class.
Activities
1. The facilitator will return the work completed by the students during workshop two
(Assignment, Short Test and Collaborative Exercise). The work completed would be
assessed based on the rubrics included in the module. The facilitator will discuss the
points obtained with the students as necessary. The facilitator will answer any
questions the students may have related to the workshop one completed work. The
assessed work from workshop one will be included in the Portfolio that will be turn in
during workshop five.
2. Assignment to be completed before workshop three : The students will submit
the assignment to the facilitator. The facilitator will clarify any doubts and will answer
any questions the student’s may have regarding the assignment.
3. Short Test: At the beginning of the workshop the students will answer the short test
about the material discussed in the previous workshop. After attending the previous
workshop, participated in the workshop activities and completed the assignment
prior to the workshop, the students will be able to answer the short test.
4. The facilitator will asked some of the students to discuss the article that they
research in the newspaper or magazine. The students must highlight the areas of
the article that provide information about the objectives to be discussed in this
workshop.
5. The facilitator will discuss the material related to the objectives in workshop three
and may provide and discuss some practice problems during the workshop. These
problems will allow the students to clarify any questions and to improve their skills
and knowledge in the workshop material.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 32
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
6. Collaborative Exercise: After completion of the previous activities the facilitator will
divide the class in groups of three to five students. Each group will work the following
collaborative exercise. A speaker will be selected in each group. The facilitator will
let the students know how much time they have to solve the problem. The solution
will be turn in to the facilitator on a piece of paper with the name of all the members
of the group. (See Appendix N for exercise and Appendix C for Rub ric to
evaluate group work). (Note : The facilitator can assign another collaborative
exercise different from the one in the module. If the collaborative exercise is
changed, the facilitator should notify the students about the change in the previous
workshop).
7. The facilitator will select one group and asked them to solve and present results of
the collaborative exercise. Each group will have the opportunity to discuss their
solution if different from the solution presented by the first group.
8. The facilitator will discuss the assignment to be completed before workshop four.
Also, the facilitator will provide a list of problems to be included as part of the
assignment before workshop four.
Assessment
Short Test: The students will answer a short test at the beginning of the workshop
about the material discussed in the previous workshop.
Group activity rubric
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 33
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Taller Cuatro
Objetivos Específicos
Al finalizar el Taller, el estudiante:
1. Resolver un sistema de ecuaciones lineales graficamente.
2. Determinar si un system de ecuaciones es consistente, inconsistente, dependiente o
independiente.
3. Resolver un sistema de ecuaciones lineales utilizando el metodo de substitucion.
4. Resolver un sistema de ecuaciones lineales utilizando el metodo de eliminacion.
5. Resolver problemas aplicados a finanzas y economia utilizando un sistema de dos
ecuaciones lineales.
6. Definir una Matriz y determinar la dimension de las matrices..
7. Sumar y restar matrices.
8. Obtener el producto de una matriz con un valor constante.
9. Multiplicar matrices.
10. Resolver problemas utilizando matrices.
Objetivos de Lenguaje
1. Demostrar dominio del idioma Español (vocabulario, sintaxis, presentación de
ideas).
2. Utilización apropiada y correcta de gramática.
3. Aplicación y utilización correcta y apropiada de los verbos.
Direcciones Electrónicas
En estos sitios los estudiantes podrán encontrar información sobre sistemas de
ecuaciones lineales y matrices.
http://www.sosmath.com/soe/SE2001/SE2001.html
http://www.sparknotes.com/math/algebra1/systemsofequations/
http://www.mathmax.com/introalg/chapter/bk3c8.html
http://www.mathnotes.com/Intro/aw_introchap7.html
http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_Waner/RealWorld/tutorialsf1/unit3_1.html
http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/CAS/courses.d/IFEM.d/IFEM.AppB.d/IFEM.AppB.
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/explore/emmaspages/option1.html
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 34
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
http://www.intmath.com/Matrices-determinants/4_Multiplying-matrices.php
http://www.sosmath.com/matrix/matrix1/matrix1.html
http://www.sectormatematica.cl/contenidos/matriz.htm
Tareas a realizar antes del Taller Cuatro
1. El/la estudiante leerá y buscará información relacionada a los objetivos del taller
cuatro en los libros de texto recomendados o en direcciones electrónicas o cualquier
otra referencia bibliográfica.
2. Una vez realice la lectura, los estudiantes definirán y buscarán ejemplos de los
siguientes términos. es un trabajo individual; no se aceptarán copias de la Internet o
de las direcciones electrónicas utilizadas. (Ver Anejo A: Honestidad Académica).
• Sistema de ecuaciones lineales
• Sistema de ecuaciones lineales Consistentes
• Sistema de ecuaciones lineales Independientes
• Sistema de ecuaciones lineales Inconsistentes
• Sistema de ecuaciones lineales Dependientes
• Mencione tres métodos utilizados para resolver un sistema de ecuaciones
lineales
• Matrices
• Regla para sumar o restar matrices
• Regla para multiplicar dos matrices
3. El facilitador asignará problemas adicionales del libro de texto como parte de esta
tarea para entregar. Estos problemas ayudarán a los estudiantes a entender los
objetivos del taller. Este es un trabajo individual; no se aceptarán copias del Internet
o de las direcciones electrónicas utilizadas. (Ver Anejo A: Honestidad
Académica).
4. Esta tarea deberá entregarla al facilitador debidamente identificada con su nombre,
fecha y taller. La misma tiene un valor de 100 puntos. La evaluación de esta tarea
estará dividida en 70% por contenido y 30% por objetivos de lenguaje. (Ver anejo
B: Matriz valorativa para tareas previas a los tall eres).
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 35
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Actividades
1. El facilitador devolverá los trabajos completados por los estudiantes durante el taller
tres (Tarea, Prueba Corta y Trabajo Cooperativo). Estos trabajos estarán evaluados
de acuerdo con las matrices incluidas en el módulo. El facilitador discutirá la
puntuación obtenida con los estudiantes según sea necesario. El facilitador
contestará cualquier pregunta que los estudiantes tengan en relación a los trabajos
del taller uno. Estos trabajos serán incluidos en el Portafolio el cual sera entregado
en el taller cinco.
2. Trabajo para realizar previo al Taller Cuatro : El/la estudiante entregará la tarea
asignada. El facilitador contestará preguntas relacionadas a la tarea y aclarará
todas las dudas que los estudiantes tengan.
3. Prueba corta: Al comienzo del taller los estudiantes tomarán una prueba corta
sobre el material discutido en el taller anterior. Luego de haber asistido al taller
anterior, participar en las actividades del taller y haber hecho la tarea a entregar, los
estudiantes estarán capacitados para contestar esta prueba.
4. El facilitador discutirá en la clase el material relacionado a los objetivos del taller y
podrá asignar o hacer algunos problemas de práctica durante el taller. Estos
problemas ayudarán a los estudiantes a aclarar dudas y contestar cualquier
pregunta que tengan lo cual los ayudará a mejorar su conocimiento y destrezas
referentes al material de la clase.
5. El facilitador dará problemas adicionales para que los estudiantes los resuelvan en
clase para practicar los procedimientos associados con la solución de los mismos.
Estos problemas ayudarán a los estudiantes a clarificar cualquier duda o pregunta
que tengan, tambien los ayudara a mejorar el conocimiento sobre el material
discutido en el taller.
6. Trabajo cooperativo : Luego de terminar las actividades anteriores, el facilitador
dividirá la clase en grupos de tres a cinco estudiantes dependiendo del tamaño de la
clase. Cada grupo trabajará el siguiente ejercicio. El facilitador les dirá a los
estudiantes cuanto tiempo tienen para resolver el problema. La solución será
entregada en una hoja de papel con los nombres de los miembros del grupo. (Ver
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 36
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
anejos N para ejercicio y C para Matriz para evalua r trabajo en grupo). (Nota :
El facilitador puede asignar otro trabajo cooperativo diferente al que esta en el
módulo. Si el trabajo cooperativo es cambiado, el facilitador debe notificar al los
estudiantes del cambio en el taller anterior)
7. El facilitador discutirá la tarea que los estudiantes deben completer antes del
próximo taller. En adición, el facilitador proveerá una lista de los problemas a
resolver como parte de la tarea a entregar en el taller cinco.
Evaluación
Prueba corta: Los estudiantes tomarán una prueba corta al inicio del taller sobre el
material del taller anterior.
Matriz valorativa para trabajo en grupo.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 37
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Workshop Five/Taller Cinco
NOTA: Este taller es bilingüe. Tanto,
el Facilitador como los estudiantes,
deberán utilizar el idioma asignado
para cada tarea y actividad.
NOTE: This is a bilingual workshop.
Both the facilitator and student
should use the language assigned
for each homework and activity.
Specific Objectives
At the end of this workshop, the student:
1. Apply the knowledge gained during the course MATH 199 and actively participate in
the final collaborative exercise (debate-contest).
2. As part of the final collaborative exercise (debate-contest) , solve application
problems that will cover all the objectives learned during the class.
Language Objectives
1. Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow of
ideas)
2. Uses grammar appropriately and correctly.
3. Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly.
Electronic Links (URLs)
For this workshop, the students should use all the URLs included in the previous
workshops to review the objectives learned in class.
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/applets/Interest/Interest.html
http://www.getobjects.com/Components/Finance/TVM/iy.html
http://banking.about.com/od/loans/a/simpleinterest.htm
http://math.about.com/library/weekly/aa042002a.htm
http://math2.org/math/general/interest.htm
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/annuity.asp
http://www.investorwords.com/200/amortization.html
http://banking.about.com/od/loans/g/amortization.htm
http://www.getobjects.com/Components/Finance/TVM/fva.html
http://www.getobjects.com/Components/Finance/TVM/pva.html
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 38
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
http://www.sosmath.com/soe/SE2001/SE2001.html
http://www.sparknotes.com/math/algebra1/systemsofequations/
http://www.mathmax.com/introalg/chapter/bk3c8.html
http://www.mathnotes.com/Intro/aw_introchap7.html
http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_Waner/RealWorld/tutorialsf1/unit3_1.html
http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/CAS/courses.d/IFEM.d/IFEM.AppB.d/IFEM.AppB.
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/explore/emmaspages/option1.html
http://www.intmath.com/Matrices-determinants/4_Multiplying-matrices.php
http://www.sosmath.com/matrix/matrix1/matrix1.html
http://www.sectormatematica.cl/contenidos/matriz.htm
Assignments before Workshop Five
1. As a final review, the students will search information and examples about the
objectives learned in class during all the previous workshops on the recommended
textbooks and/or on the Internet, or any other bibliographic textbooks.
2. The facilitator will assign additional problems from the textbook as part of this
assignment. These problems will help the students understand the terms and
objectives of the workshop. This must be an individual work; copies from the internet
or from the URLs used will not be accepted. (See Appendix A: Academic
Honesty).
3. This assignment shall be turn in to the facilitator and shall be properly identified with
the student name, date and workshop. This assignment is worth 100 points; the
evaluation of this assignment will be 70% for content and 30% for language
objectives. (See Appendix B: Rubrics to evaluate assignments pr ior to the
workshops).
4. The students will review and study ALL the material presented in the previous
workshops. It is very important to review the collaborative exercises solved already
in the other workshops. In addition the students should review the practice problems
and the exercises included in the assignments. This will help them get prepared to
participate and solve the problems to be included in the final collaborative exercise
(debate-contest).
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 39
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Activities
1. The facilitator will start the class with a short review.
2. The facilitator will return the work completed by the students during workshop four
(Assignment, Short Test and Collaborative Exercise). The work completed would be
assessed based on the rubrics included in the module. The facilitator will discuss the
points obtained with the students as necessary. The facilitator will answer any
questions the students may have related to the workshop one completed work. The
assessed work from workshop one will be included in the Portfolio that will be turn in
during workshop five
3. Assignment to be completed before workshop five: The students will include the
assignment in the Portfolio. The facilitator will clarify any doubts and will answer any
questions the student’s may have regarding the assignment.
4. Short Test: At the beginning of the workshop the students will answer the short test
about the material discussed in the previous workshop. After attending the previous
workshop, participated in the workshop activities and completed the assignment
prior to the workshop, the students will be able to answer the short test.
5. Portfolio: The students will finalize the Portfolio in accordance with the guidance
previously provided by the facilitator. They will ensure that all the work is included
and everything is in order. The students then will turn in the Portfolio to the facilitator.
6. Final Collaborative Exercise (Debate-Contest): During this workshop the students
will participate in a final collaborative exercise (Debate-Contest). This will be a team
work, however, the assessment will consider both, individual and group performance
appraisal. Based upon the number of students registered in this course, the
facilitator will select at random a maximum of six (6) groups with no more of five (5)
students in each group. Each group will have the opportunity to answer applications
and practical exercises related to the concepts that were presented in ALL the
previous workshops. (See Appendix D: Rubric for evaluation of the final
collaborative work). The rules for this final collaborative exercise are as follows:
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 40
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
a. The collaborative exercise will consist of five (5) application problems that will
cover the objectives learned in the course workshops. Half of these exercises will
be in English and the other half will be in Spanish.
b. The application problems will cover the objectives, concepts and procedures
learned in class. Each problem will have a time limit of no more than 30 minutes
to be solved by each group.
c. After the facilitator divide the class in groups, the member of each group will seat
together in order to discuss and solve the problems.
d. The facilitator will provide the final instructions and rules to complete the
collaborative exercise. Any questions regarding the exercise or the rules will be
answer by the facilitator.
e. The applications problems will be solve one at a time; each group will work the
same exercise at the same time in the time allowed by the facilitator. The
facilitator has the option to let the students use the book and class notes as
reference.
f. The facilitator will give a copy of the first problem to each group; at that time the
facilitator will tell the students the amount of time the have to solve the problem
and then they will start. The solution of the problems will be in the language the
problem was written.
g. The groups will work quietly and without interruptions. If a student do not follow
the rules and disrupt the other groups, his/her group will have a penalty
(deduction) of five (5) points from that problem.
h. The first group to finish the problem before the time allowed, will obtained a
bonus of five (5) points and will present their solution in front of the class.
i. If none of the groups finish the problem before the time allowed, the facilitator will
provide an additional five (5) minutes to finish the problem and there won’t be a
bonus of five (5) points.
j. When the time allowed is finished, the facilitator will collect the solution from all
the groups. Then the facilitator will select a person from one of the groups to
present their solution in front of the class.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 41
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
k. After one of the groups present their solution in front of the class, the other
groups will have the opportunity to agree or disagree with the solution presented.
In case of a disagreement a group can challenge the first group, the second
group will present their solution in front of the class. If the second group is
correct, they will receive a bonus of five (5) points. In case that none of the
groups obtained the correct answer, the facilitator will provide and discuss the
correct solution.
l. If the solution from a group is incorrect but the procedure used is correct, the
group will get partial credit for the problem.
m. After completing the discussion on the first problem, the facilitator will provide a
copy of the next problem to each group. The process will be repeated until all the
problems in the collaborative exercise are completed and their solution has been
presented.
n. All the students should have an active participation in the discussion and solution
of the problems to earn individual points. The individual points will be between 5
and 10 points per problem depending on the type of exercise.
o. The facilitator can grant additional points to a group depending on the number of
correct solutions and the participation of the group members.
7. After completion of the final collaborative exercise, the students will write two or
three paragraphs were they will provide feedback to the facilitator about the course
and his/her teaching techniques. The students should include if their expectations
about the course were met.
8. The students will complete the class evaluation. The student representative will
return the course evaluation to the front office.
9. Closing activity – to be determined by the facilitator.
Assessment
Short Test: The students will answer a short test at the beginning of the workshop
about the material discussed in the previous workshop.
Group work rubric
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 42
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejos/Appendixes
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 43
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo A/Appendix A
Academic Honesty - Plagiarism
Dear Student:
The internet, although a very resourceful tool in today’s world has become a tool where
students and other professionals can find what others have done in seconds; thus
promoting or developing the temptation to use what others have done without giving
them the appropriate credit for their work. In an article published by Indiana University, it
was stated that using the ideas of others without giving proper credit to the source of
that information is considered plagiarism .
Whenever we use information from other sources it is extremely important that you:
1. Give credit to the person’s ideas, theories or opinions.
2. Give credit to a person if we use a chart, graph, drawing or any other type of
knowledge needed to support a paper.
3. Give credit to a person or source if we use a quotation or paraphrase ideas that
belong to them.
For more information go to http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/plagiarism.shtml
or simply search for the topic of plagiarism under: www.plagiarism.org.
Important Note: Plagiarism is a serious issue and i t is considered an offense that has
serious consequences; which in turn may affect your academic success and
professional career. There are workshops offered to help you when writing papers to
avoid falling into this serious matter. You can che ck for time and dates of these
workshops in the Learning Resources Center. Our fa cilitators can also provide you with
help when writing papers and/or assignments.
Sincerely, Ricardo Ortolaza, Ed.D. Chief Learning Officer
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 44
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Honestidad Académica - Plagio
Apreciado (a) Estudiante:
La red cibernética (Internet) se considera una herramienta efectiva en el mundo actual. La
misma se ha convertido en un recurso donde los estudiantes y los profesionales pueden
encontrar, rápidamente información e investigaciones que otros han realizado. Esto puede
propiciar la tentación de utilizar lo que otros han hecho o investigado sin darles el debido
crédito por su trabajo. En un artículo publicado por la Universidad de Indiana, se indica que
utilizar ideas de otras personas sin darle crédito al recurso que lo produjo se considera plagio.
Siempre que se utilice información de otras fuentes o recursos, es de suma importancia:
1. Dar crédito a las ideas, teorías y opiniones de otras personas o recursos.
2. Dar crédito a la persona o recurso de donde obtuvo tablas, gráficas, dibujos u otro tipo
de información o conocimiento para apoyar las ideas que expone en su trabajo.
3. Dar crédito si utiliza citas o parafrasea ideas que pertenecen a otras personas o
recursos.
Para más información visite la página:
http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/plagiarism.shtml
o simplemente busque información sobre plagio en: www.plagiarism.org.
Nota Importante: El plagio es un asunto serio y se considera una ofensa que tiene
consecuencias serias; que a su vez puede afectar su éxito académico y carrera
profesional. Existen talleres que le pueden ayudar a la creación de documentos y evitar
cometer plagio. Puede obtener información de las fe chas y horas de dichos talleres en el
Centro de Recursos Educativos. Nuestros facilitador es también le pueden proveer
información sobre cómo hacer sus trabajos evitando el plagio.
Sinceramente, Ricardo Ortolaza, Ed.D. Chief Learning Officer
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 45
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo B/Appendix B
Matriz Valorativa para Tareas Previas al Taller
Assignment before Workshop One
Student Name: ______________________ Date: _______________
Criteria Value Points Student Score
Content Part 2 – The definitions are complete, clear and well stated. The proper information and examples are provided for each term. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
20
Part 3 (a) – The answer is correct for each of the equations. 5
Part 3 (b) – The answer is clear and well stated. The addition and multiplication properties are clearly explained. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
10
Part 3 (c) – The answer is clear and well stated. The explanation is complete and provides enough information. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
10
Part 3 (d) – The answer is clear and well stated. It provides the necessary details to explain what a slope is. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
5
Part 3 (e) – The answer is clear and well stated. It provides the necessary details to explain how to determine if a graph is a function. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
5
Part 3 (f) – The answer is clear and well stated. The explanation provides enough information to establish the relationship between functions and equations. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
5
Part 3 (g) – The answer is clear and well stated. The general steps are provided and clearly explained. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
10
Language Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow of ideas)
10
Uses grammar appropriately and correctly 10 Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly 10
Total Points 100 (70% content and
30% language )
Student’s total Score:
_______
Facilitador’s Signature: _________________________
Student’s Signature: __________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 46
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Tarea Previa al Taller Dos
Nombre Estudiante: ______________________ Fecha: _______________
Criteria Puntuación Puntuación Estudiante Cont enido
Parte 2 – Las definiciones están completas, son claras y bien establecidas. Se provee información correcta y se dan ejemplos según necesario. La respuesta se provee en oraciones claras y concisas.
20
Parte 3 – Se contestan todos los problemas, las contestaciones son correctas y se provee el procedimiento por el cual se obtuvo la respuesta (según sea necesario). El procedimiento y las formulas utilizadas son correctas. Los problemas se resuelven y se entrega en forma organizada y limpia.
50
Languaje Demostrar dominio del idioma Español (vocabulario, syntax, presentación de ideas)
10
Utilización apropiada y correcta de gramática 10 Aplicación y utilización correcta y apropiada de los verbos
10
Total de Puntos 100 (70% contenido y
30% languaje)
Puntuación total Estudiante: _______
Firma de Facilitador: _________________________
Firma de Estudiante: __________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 47
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Assignment before Workshop Three
Student Name: ______________________ Date: _______________
Criteria Value Points Student Score Content
Part 2 – The definitions are complete, clear and well stated. The proper information is provided and examples are provided for each term. The sentences are cohesive and have a proper flow.
20
Part 3 – All the problems are solved, the answers are correct and the procedure used to find the solution is provided (as necessary). The procedure and formulas used are correct. The assignment is clean and the problems are solved in an organized way.
45
Part 5 – The student searched and brought to class an article related to the class objectives. The student is ready to discuss the article in class.
5
Language Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow of ideas)
10
Uses grammar appropriately and correctly 10 Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly
10
Total Points 100 (70% content and 30% language)
Student’s total Score: _______
Facilitator’s Signature: _________________________
Student’s Signature: __________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 48
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Tarea Previa al Taller Cuatro
Nombre Estudiante: ______________________ Fecha: _______________
Criteria Puntuación Puntuación Estudiante
Cont enido Parte 2 – Las definiciones están completas, son claras y bien establecidas. Se provee información correcta y se dan ejemplos según necesario. La respuesta se provee en oraciones claras y concisas.
20
Parte 3 – Se contestan todos los problemas, las contestaciones son correctas y se provee el procedimiento por el cual se obtuvo la respuesta (según sea necesario). El procedimiento y las formulas utilizadas son correctas. Los problemas se resuelven y se entrega en forma organizada y limpia.
50
Languaje Demostrar dominio del idioma Español (vocabulario, syntax, presentación de ideas)
10
Utilización apropiada y correcta de gramática 10 Aplicación y utilización correcta y apropiada de los verbos
10
Total de Puntos 100 (70% contenido y 30%
languaje)
Puntuación total
Estudiante: _______
Firma de Facilitador: _________________________
Firma de Estudiante: __________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 49
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Tarea Previa al Taller Cinco
Nombre Estudiante: ______________________ Fecha: _______________
Criteria Puntuación Puntuación Estudiante
Contenido Part 2 – All the problems are solved, the answers are correct and the procedure used to find the solution is provided (as necessary). The procedure and formulas used are correct. The assignment is clean and the problems are solved in an organized way.
70
Languaje Demostrar dominio del idioma Español (vocabulario, syntax, presentación de ideas)
10
Utilización apropiada y correcta de gramática 10 Aplicación y utilización correcta y apropiada de los verbos 10
Total de Puntos 100 (70% contenido y 30%
languaje)
Puntuación total Estudiante:
_______
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 50
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo C/Appendix C
RUBRIC FOR COLLABORATIVE EXERCISE EVALUATION
Workshop One & Three NAME: _____________________________ Date: ______________
CRITERIA Value Points Workshop 1 Student Score
Workshop 3 Student Score
1. Frequently contribute to group discussions
10
2. Show interest in group discussions
10
3. Answer questions from other students and from the facilitator
5
4. Make questions related to the collaborative exercise
5
5. Present arguments based on the readings and class work
10
6. Show attention and is opened to the arguments from other students
10
7. Answer to the exercise is correct 25 8. Procedures and formulas are
included and correct. 20
9. Work is organized 5 TOTAL Points 100 Student’s
Score WS1:
Student’s Score WS3:
Comments; ___________________________________________________________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 51
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
RÚBRICA PARA EVALUAR LA PARTICIPACIÓN EN EL TRABAJO EN GRUPO
Taller Dos & Cuatro NOMBRE: _____________________________ Fecha: ______________
CRITERIA Puntuación Taller 2 Puntos Est.
Taller 4 Puntos Est.
1. Contribuye frecuentemente a las discusiones en el grupo
10
2. Demuestra interés en las discusiones en grupo
10
3. Contesta preguntas del facilitador y sus compañeros
5
4. Formula preguntas pertinentes al ejercicio cooperativo
5
5. Presenta argumentos fundamentados en las lecturas y trabajos de la clase
10
6. Demuestra atención y apertura a los argumentos de sus compañeros
10
7. La respuesta del ejercicio es correcta
25
8. El procedimiento y las formulas estan incluidas y son correctas
20
9. El trabajo es organizado 5 TOTAL Puntos 100 Total Puntos
WS2:
Total Puntos WS4:
Comentarios; ___________________________________________________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 52
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo D/Appendix D
RUBRIC FOR EVALUATION OF THE FINAL COLLABORATIVE EX ERCISE
NAME: _____________________________ Date: ______________
CRITERIA Value Points Student Score 1. Frequently contribute to group discussions 5 2. Show interest in group discussions 5 3. Present arguments based on the readings and
class work 5
4. Make questions related to the collaborative exercise
5
5. Show attention and is opened to the arguments from other students
5
6. Answer to exercise number one is correct, the procedure and formulas used are correct and the work is organized.
15
7. Answer to exercise number two is correct, the procedure and formulas used are correct and the work is organized.
15
8. Answer to exercise number three is correct, the procedure and formulas used are correct and the work is organized.
15
9. Answer to exercise number four is correct, the procedure and formulas used are correct and the work is organized.
15
10. Answer to exercise number five is correct, the procedure and formulas used are correct and the work is organized.
15
TOTAL Points 100 Student’s Score:
Comments;
___________________________________________________________________
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 53
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo E/Appendix E
PORTFOLIO
Guidelines to prepare the portfolio
1. Determination of sources of content
2. The following, but not limited to, documentation will be included:
a. Projects, surveys, and reports.
b. Oral presentations
c. Essays: dated writing samples to show progress
d. Research papers: dated unedited and edited first drafts to show progress
e. Written pieces that illustrate critical thinking about readings: response or
reaction papers.
f. Class notes, interesting thoughts to remember, etc.
g. Learning journals, reflexive diaries.
h. Self assessments, peer assessments, facilitator assessments.
i. Notes from student-facilitator conferences.
3. Organization of documentation
Documentation will be organized by workshop, and by type of assignment within
workshops. Workshops will be separated from one another using construction paper
or paper of different colors, with tabs indicating the workshop number.
4. Presentation of the portfolio
• Documentation will be posted in a binder or in a digital version (e-portfolio).
• The cover page will follow exactly APA guidelines applied to a cover page of
research papers submitted at Metro Orlando Campus. This cover page will be
placed at the beginning of the portfolio.
• The entire portfolio will follow APA style: Courier or Times New Roman font,
size 12, double space, and 1-inch margins. See a “Publication Manual of the
APA, Fifth Edition”
• A log of entries that can be expanded with each new entry properly
numbered. The table, which should be located at the beginning, should
include a brief description, date produced, date submitted, and date evaluated
(Appendix G ).
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 54
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
• Introduction and conclusion of the income and outcome of the portfolio.
• A list of references and appendixes of all assignments included will be added
to the end of the portfolio.
• The Portfolio Informational Sheet will be placed in the transparent front pocket
of the binder for identification purposes (Appendix F ).
5. Student-Facilitator Feedback Template: Progression follow-up
The final step in implementing portfolios, before returning them to the student or
school life, is sharing feedback with each student to review the contents, student
reflections, and your evaluations of individual items and all of the work together as
related to learning targets (Banks, 2005).
Facilitators will e-mail a feedback template to all students. This template will contain
information pertaining to weaknesses and strengths found in students’ portfolios
(Appendix J ). Facilitators will focus their attention on showing students what is
possible and their progress rather than what is wrong; however, this does not mean
that facilitators will not cover weaknesses and areas for improvement during the
conference. Facilitators will send this feedback template upon completion of
workshop one.
Students will also have the opportunity to respond to the facilitator’s feedback and
write their own comments and/or ideas of how to improve the quality of their
portfolios, and how to become better metacognitive learners on the feedback
template. Students will e-mail the template with their comments back to the facilitator
after every workshop.
6. Portfolio storage:
• Portfolio samples will be safely stored for a six-month term on campus.
• Students will sign an official document empowering Ana G. Mendez
University System with rights to use their portfolios with educational or
accreditation purposes during this term (Appendix K ).
• After this term, and if their authors authorize Ana G. Mendez University
System to discard their portfolios by signing an official document, portfolio
samples will be destroyed; otherwise, they will be returned to their original
authors (Appendix L ).
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 55
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo F/Appendix F
PORTFOLIO INFORMATIONAL SHEET
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Metro Orlando Campus
Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo Check one: � Universidad del Este � Universidad Metropolitana � Universidad del Turabo Check one: � Undergraduate
� Graduate
Concentration
Student’s Name
Facilitator’s Name
Course:
Portfolio rated as
Reason of this rate
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 56
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo G/Appendix G
Log of Entries
Entry Description
Date of Entry
Date
Submitted
Date
Evaluated
Page #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 57
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo H/Appendix H
Checklist for Portfolio Assessment
Has the student set academic goals?
Does the portfolio include enough entries in each area to make
valid judgments?
Does the portfolio include evidence of complex learning in realistic
setting?
Does the portfolio provide evidence of various types of student
learning?
Does the portfolio include students’ self-evaluations and
reflections on what was learned?
Does the portfolio enable one to determine learning progress and
current level of learning?
Does the portfolio provide clear evidence of learning to users of
the portfolio?
Does the portfolio provide for student participation and
responsibility?
Does the portfolio present entries in a well-organized and useful
manner?
Does the portfolio include assessments based on clearly stated
criteria of successful performance?
Does the portfolio provide for greater interaction between
instruction and assessment?
Adapted from: Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson
Education, Inc.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 58
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo I/Appendix I
Portfolio Rubric
4 3 2 1
PORTFOLIO APPEARANCE
� Readable: Are entries typed in an appropriate font and size? Are
entries free of errors? Do ideas expressed in entries follow a logical sequence with appropriate transitions among paragraphs and topics?
� Professionalism: Is the appearance of the portfolio
professional? Are graphics, colors and portfolio language consistent with professional workplace expectations? Is the portfolio presented in a neat and orderly manner?
� Organization: Is the portfolio organized in a manner that makes
it easy to follow and easy to quickly locate information?
PORTFOLIO CONTENT AND FUNCTION
� Content: Are all required entries included in the portfolio? Are
entries relevant to the content of the portfolio? Do all entries contain the student’s reaction or reflection on the selected topics? Do entries provide thorough understanding of content? Resume, Activities List, Varied Samples of Written Work, Evidence of Problem Solving, and Evidence of Decision Making.
� Authenticity: Are the samples and illustrations a true reflection
of the student’s efforts and abilities?
� Growth/Development: Do samples provide thorough
understanding of growth and development related to their field of concentration? Do items show what the student has learned?
� Collaboration: Do items show examples of both individual and
group work? Does the student provide clear understanding of collaboration, and use collaboration to support his/her learning?
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 59
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
� Reflection and Personal growth: Do items show exceptional
understanding of how to be a reflective thinker and how to seek opportunities for professional growth? Does the student include self-reflective comments? Does the student reflect enthusiasm for learning?
� Professional Conduct: Do items show clear understanding of
ethical behavior and professional conduct? Do items display the pride the student has in his or her work?
Overall Portfolio Impact
� Is this portfolio an asset in demonstrating the student’s value
(skills, abilities, knowledge) to a potential employer or college representative?
Rating Scale 4 = Outstanding 3 = Very good 2 = Good 1 = Needs improvement Source: Retrieved from www.lcusd.net/lchs/portfolio/rubric.htm on February 10th, 2007. Adapted 02/10/2007 by Fidel R. Távara, M.Ed. Coordinator of Assessment and Placement – Metro Orlando Campus
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 60
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo J/Appendix J
Portfolio Assessment Feedback Template Strengths Weaknesses Improvement Ideas Facilitato r’s comments
Student’s response and comments
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 61
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo K/Appendix K
Use and Return of Portfolio
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo
I, ____________________________________, grant permission to the office of
Assessment and Placement of the Ana G. Méndez University System, to keep in
their records a copy of my portfolio. I understand that the portfolio is going to be
used for accreditation or educational purposes only, and that is not going to be
disclosed without my consent.
By signing this document I authorize the office of Assessment and Placement to
keep a copy of my portfolio for six months and return it to me at the end of this
period of time.
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Name (print) Date
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Signature Date
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 62
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo L/Appendix L
Use and Discard of Portfolio
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo
I, ____________________________________, grant permission to the office of
Assessment and Placement of the Ana G. Méndez University System to keep in
their records a copy of my portfolio. I understand that the portfolio is going to be
used for accreditation or educational purposes only, and that is not going to be
disclosed without my consent.
By signing this document I authorize the Office of Placement and Assessment to
keep a copy of my portfolio for six months and discard it at the end of this period of
time.
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Name (print) Date
_______________________________ ___________
Student’s Signature Date
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 63
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo M/Appendix M
PARÁMETROS ESPECÍFICOS PARA EVALUAR ASISTENCIA Y
PARTICIPACIÓN
La evaluación de asistencia y participación en los cinco talleres tiene un peso de
15% del total de la evaluación final del curso MATH 199. Es requisito insustituible la
asistencia a todas las cinco reuniones, dos o más ausencias equivalen a fracaso del
curso. Las actividades realizadas en el taller ausente, sujetas a evaluación, serán
consideradas y ponderadas de acuerdo con los parámetros específicos. Por lo
tanto, si el/la estudiante se ausenta y entrega los trabajos posteriormente, su
puntuación comenzará con descuento porcentual previamente establecido para
cada actividad realizada en la respectiva reunión; como se demuestra a
continuación:
Actividad Puntos Descontados
Trabajos a realizar previo a cada taller 20 puntos por cada taller que entregue tarde
Trabajo cooperativo Pierde todos los puntos
Prueba corta 20 puntos / Debe reponer antes del siguiente taller, de no ser así perderá todos los puntos.
Portafolio Pierde todos los puntos
Trabajo Final Cooperativo Pierde todos los puntos
Asistencia & Participación:
En un rango de 1 a 20 puntos, siendo 20 la puntuación mayor por cada taller, se
considerará que el/la estudiante haya efectuado aportaciones o preguntas efectivas
en la discusión de los conceptos, ejercicios y actividades del taller. Debe entenderse
por aportaciones efectivas todas aquellas preguntas, presentaciones o ayudas que
dirijan al grupo hacia un mejor entendimiento de los temas discutidos.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 64
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
SPECIFIC PARAMETERS FOR THE ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIP ATION
EVALUATION
The evaluation for attendance and participation is worth 15% of the total final
evaluation of the class. Attendance to all five workshops is required and cannot be
replaced; students with two or more absences will fail the class. If the student is
absent, the student must contact the facilitator, in order to be ready for the next
workshop. The students will loose points accordingly based on the specific
parameters for all activities subject to evaluation during the workshop that the
student is absent, see table below:
Activity Discounted Points
Assignments prior to each workshop 20 points for each workshop that the work is late.
Collaborative Exercise Loose all the points
Quizzes 20 points / Must be taken prior to the next workshop otherwise will loose all the points.
Portfolio Loose all the points
Final Collaborative Exercise Loose all the points
Attendance & Participation:
In a range from 1 to 20 points, where 20 is the highest score the students can get in
each workshop, this will considered how effective were the students questions and
comments in relation to the discussion of the class topics, problems and workshop
activities. The affectivity of the student participation will be measured based on the
how the questions and comments helped to clarify the concepts and to make it more
understandable.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 65
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Anejo N/Appendix N
COLLABORATIVE EXERCISE
WORKSHOP 1
A company pays a monthly rent of $3,000 for the office space and it pays $1,000 to
each employee every month (there is a total of 12 employees). In addition each
employee gets a bonus of $10 for each unit that they complete during the month.
The company’s revenue is $18 for each unit completed by the employees. Answer
the following questions;
1. Write the equation for the monthly salary S(x) for EACH employee, where x
are the units completed by each employee during the month. Also, write the
equation for the monthly salary for ALL the employees, T(x).
2. If all the employees completed the same number of units (x) during the
month, write the equation for the company’s monthly revenue R(x) as a
function of x. Also, write the equation for the company’s profit, P(x).
3. Supposed that ONE employee completed 300 units in a month, calculate the
monthly salary for this employee. Additionally, supposed that EACH
employee completed 300 units in a month, calculate the company’s monthly
revenue.
4. Based on the company’s growth, they decided to change their location and
rent a bigger office that will cost $10,000 a month. They also decided to hire
50 employees in addition to the original 12 employees. The salary for the new
employees and the bonus will be the same as for the original employees
($1,000 a month plus $10 for each completed unit a month). The company’s
revenue remains the same at $18 for each unit completed in a month. What
will be the equation for the company’s profit P(x), taking into consideration the
new office and the new number of employees?
How many units (x) have to be completed by the employees in a month in
order for the company’s monthly revenue double the salary of all the
employees?
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 66
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
TRABAJO COOPERATIVO
TALLER DOS
Aplicación de Funciones Exponenciales
La cantidad de dinero en una cuenta de banco se puede calcular co la siguiente
formula, cuando sabemos la tasa de interés (i), el tiempo en anos (t) y la cantidad
con la cual se abrió la cuenta, principal (P);
A = P (1 + i)t
Por ejemplo: Una cuenta que se abre con $100 y gana el 5% de interés, cual es la
cantidad que Habrá en la cuenta en 7 anos?
A = 100 (1 + 0.05) 7 = 100 (1.05) 7 � A = 140.71
1. Resuelva la siguiente situación utilizando esta fórmula; George Washington
deposita $1.00 en el Banco Continental en 1776. El banco a pagado el 5% de
interés por todos estos años. ¿Cuánto dinero hay en la cuenta de banco hoy?
(Asumir que no se ha hecho ningún retiro de la cuenta)
Para calcular la cantidad de dinero (s) que habrá en una cuenta cuando se hace un
pago regular (r) durante un periodo de anos (t) se utiliza la siguiente fórmula si el
interés (i) es conocido;
s = r (1 + i)n – 1 (1 + i) i
Por ejemplo: Si se comienza una cuenta de IRA en 1980, en la cual se depositan
$2000 cada año y se gana el 8% de interés. Si la cuenta se tiene por 16 anos,
cuanto habrá en la cuenta?
s = 2000 (1 + .08)16 – 1 (1 + .08) = 2000 (1.08)16 – 1 (1.08) � s = 65500.5 0.08 0.08
2. Utilizando esta fórmula, resuelva la siguiente situación: Una pareja tienen un hijo
y quieren abrir una cuenta para cuando el niño empiece en la universidad. Ellos
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 67
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
quieren abrir una cuenta que les de el 8% de interés para que cuando el hijo tenga
18 anos la cuenta tenga $10,000. Para que esto ocurra, ¿cuánto tienen que
depositar cada año en cuenta?
3. Si una persona comienza un cuenta de IRA cuando cumple 21 anos, en la cual
deposita $2,000 cada año. Si el interés es del 8%, ¿cuánto dinero habrá en la
cuenta cuando esta persona se retire a los 65 años?
4. Asumiendo la misma situación del problema #3, pero ahora la persona quiere
tener $1,000,000 cuando se retire a los 65 años. ¿Cuánto esta persona tiene que
depositar cada año en la cuenta de IRA?
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 68
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
COLLABORATIVE EXERCISE
WORKSHOP 3
IRA Venture
Tim, Tom and Teresa are triplets.
- Tim started to invest in an IRA when he turned 30 years old. He deposited
$2,000 in the IRA every year for 10 consecutive years. Then he decided to
stop making any more deposits. He left the amount already deposited in the
account gaining interests until he turns 60 years old, at that time he will retire
and withdraw the money.
- Tom started to invest in an IRA when he turned 40 years old. He decided to
deposit $2,000 in the IRA every year until he turns 60 years old, at that time
he will retire and withdraw the money.
- Teresa started to invest in an IRA when she turned 30 years old. She decided
to deposit $2,000 in the IRA every year until she turns 60 years old, at that
time she will retire and withdraw the money.
As the financial analysts for Tim, Tom and Teresa, you need to determine how much
money each one will have in their IRA accounts when they decide to retire and
withdraw the money. To accomplish this task you should prepare a table showing
how much they are investing in their individual IRA accounts. The following table will
help you with the analysis; the table already has the calculations for each one during
the first fifteen years of their investment. You need to complete the table for the
remaining 15 years to show how much each one of them will have in their IRA when
they turn 60 years old.
Use the information provided in the table to determine how you will continue to
calculate the balance in each account.
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 69
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
Collaborative Exercise: IRA Venture
After completing the table, answer the following questions;
a. How much each one have at the time that they retire and withdraw the money
in the account?
b. In what year Tom and Tim will have in their accounts the same amount of
money?
c. In what year Teresa could have stop making payments to her IRA account
and still have more money than Tom at the time they retired?
MATH 199 Quantitative Methods I 70
Prep. 2004. Sylvia Y. Cosme. Rev. 2004, 2008. Armando J. Sánchez, EPM, MS/EMS
TRABAJO COOPERATIVO
TALLER CUATRO
Balance de Costo y Ganancia
Toda compañía tiene unas ecuaciones de costo y ganancia con las cuales pueden
hacer una comparación para saber si la compañía esta produciendo lo suficiente
para tener una ganancia o si los costos son muy altos y no hay ganancias. Estas
ecuaciones son diferentes para cada compañía porque ellas dependen de los
costos fijos y variables de la compañía y del precio del producto que la compañía
produce.
Una compañía de lámparas de techo tiene un costo fijo de $800 mensuales por las
facilidades y otros gastos. El costo variable de la compañía es de $10 por cada
lámpara que se produce. Cada lámpara tiene un precio de $25 cada una. Las
ecuaciones de costo y ganancia que la compañía utiliza son las siguientes (donde x
son la cantidad de lámparas producidas en un mes):
Ecuación de costo; c = 10x + 800
Ecuación de ganancia; g = 25x
Utilizando esta información, conteste las siguientes preguntas;
- Cuantas lámparas la compañía tiene que producir y vender en un mes para que el
costo sea igual a la ganancia.
- Dibuje en una gráfica la línea para cada ecuación y encuentre el punto donde el
costo es igual a la ganancia.