Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    1/10

    2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Masterfile Corporation v. McKayMorrison C. England, Jr, presiding

    Edmund F. Brennan, referral

    Date filed: 01/20/2011

    Date terminated: 07/11/2011

    Date of last filing: 07/11/2011

    Doc.

    No.Dates Description

    Filed & Entered: 01/20/2011 CAED Receipt

    1 Filed & Entered: 01/20/2011 Complaint

    3 Filed & Entered: 01/20/2011 Summons

    4 Filed & Entered: 01/20/2011 Civil New Case Documents for MCE

    5 Filed & Entered: 05/16/2011 Stipulation and Proposed Order

    6 Filed & Entered: 05/16/2011 Minute Order

    7 Filed & Entered: 05/19/2011 Stipulation and Order

    8 Filed & Entered: 06/09/2011 Notice - Other

    9 Filed & Entered: 06/24/2011 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

    10 Filed & Entered: 07/11/2011 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

    PACER Service Center

    Transaction Receipt

    01/11/2012 21:56:48

    PACER

    Login:im0564 Client Code:

    Description: History/DocumentsSearch

    Criteria:

    2:11-cv-00177-MCE

    -EFB

    Billable

    Pages:1 Cost: 0.08

    4.1.1 CM/ECF - U.S. District Court for Eastern California-Histor... https://ecf.caed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/HistDocQry.pl?2959816881

    1/12/2012 1

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    2/10

    1

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    STEVEN M. WEINBERG (SBN 235581)COWAN, DEBAETS, ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP30765 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 411Malibu, California 90265Tel: (310) 457-6100

    Fax: (310) 457-9555Email: [email protected]

    Attorneys for PlaintiffMasterfile Corporation

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    MASTERFILE CORPORATION,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    DEAN MCKAY, d.b.a. drdeanmckay.com,

    Defendant.

    Case No.

    COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES,

    PROFITS, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER

    EQUITABLE RELIEF FOR FEDERAL

    COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND

    REMOVAL OF COPYRIGHT

    MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

    Plaintiff Masterfile Corporation (Masterfile), by its attorneys Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams, &

    Sheppard LLP, as and for its Complaint against Defendant DEAN MCKAY, d.b.a.

    drdeanmckay.com (collectively, Defendant), alleges as follows:

    1. This is an action for copyright infringement arising out of Defendantsunauthorized reproduction and use of original copyright protected photographs owned and

    INTRODUCTION

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 1 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    3/10

    2

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    registered by Plaintiff Masterfile. Masterfile seeks injunctive and monetary relief for copyright

    infringement under the provisions of the Copyright Act of the United States, as amended, 17

    U.S.C. 101 et seq. and for violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.

    1201 et seq.

    2. Plaintiff is a well known stock photography agency with offices at 3 ConcordeGate, Fourth Floor, Toronto, Canada. Plaintiff is in the business of licensing reproduction rights

    in photographs to users for a fee.

    PARTIES

    3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Dean McKay is a California residentengaged in the business of management consulting, doing business under the name

    drdeanmckay.com.

    4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 501(b) and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant, uponinformation and belief, resides in this judicial district, and engaged in the acts complained of in

    this judicial district.

    6. Venue is proper within this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400.

    7. On or about March 23, 2010, Plaintiff discovered that Defendant was using five(5) copyrighted photographs owned by Plaintiff (the Infringed Images) on Defendants website

    www.drdeanmckay.com (the Website).

    FACTS

    8. Plaintiff has complied in all respects with Copyright Act of the United States andsecured the exclusive rights and privileges in and to the copyright in the Infringed Images by

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 2 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    4/10

    3

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    registering its claims of copyright in the Infringed Images and receiving certificates of

    registration from the Copyright Office under the following registration numbers:

    Plaintiff Image

    Identification Number

    Copyright Registration Number Registration Effective Date

    700-00018365 VA 1-023-866 July 17, 2000

    700-00020260 VA 1-023-866 July 17, 2000

    700-00021846 VA 1-023-866 July 17, 2000

    700-00023645 VA 1-023-866 July 17, 2000

    700-00024044 VA 1-023-866 July 17, 2000

    Copies of the certificates of registration for these Infringed Images (without the

    Continuation Sheets), which were registered as individual images within compilations, are

    attached hereto as Exhibit A

    9. Without Plaintiffs knowledge or consent, Defendant reproduced these InfringedImages and displayed the unauthorized copies on the Website. Defendant is not, and has never

    been, licensed or otherwise authorized to use the Infringed Images.

    .

    10. Plaintiff notified Defendant that Defendants unauthorized use of the InfringingImages constitutes copyright infringement, and provided Defendant with an opportunity to

    rectify its infringing conduct, but Defendant refused to so rectify its conduct.

    11. Defendants conduct as aforesaid was willful.

    (Copyright Infringement Under 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.)

    COUNT ONE

    12. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained inparagraphs 1 through 11 above.

    13. Defendants actions as described above constitute infringement of Plaintiffsexclusive rights under its registered copyright in violation of 17 U.S.C. 106 and 501.

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 3 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    5/10

    4

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    14. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages, which include its actual losses and anyand all profits Defendant have made as a result of its infringing conduct. 17 U.S.C. 504.

    15. Plaintiff is entitled to recover actual damages in no less than the amount of$13,170.00 or in lieu thereof, at Plaintiffs election, statutory damages in no less than the amount

    of $750,000.00, plus attorneys fees and costs.

    (Intentional Removal of Copyright Management Information

    COUNT TWO

    Under 17 U.S.C. 1202(b))

    16. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained inparagraphs 1 through 15 above.

    17. The Infringed Images copied contained embedded copyright managementinformation protected under 17 U.S.C. 1202(b).

    18. Upon information and belief, Defendant intentionally removed the copyrightmanagement information with the intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement

    of Plaintiffs rights under the Copyright Act.

    19. Defendants conduct as aforesaid is a violation of 17 U.S.C. 1202(b).20. By reason of said violation, Plaintiff is entitled to recover statutory damages

    under 17 U.S.C. 1203(c) in the maximum amount of $2,500.00 for each of the five (5)

    circumventions, for a total of $12,500.00, plus costs and attorneys fees.

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for the following relief against Defendant:

    A. A judgment from this Court that Defendant (1) infringed Plaintiffs exclusiverights in the Infringed Images, and that this infringement was willful, and (2) wrongfully

    removed Plaintiffs copyright management information embedded in the Infringed Images, and

    that such removal was willful.

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 4 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    6/10

    5

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    B. Permanent injunctive relief in the form of an order or orders requiring thatDefendant, and its respective officers, directors, principals, representatives, agents, servants,

    employees, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with each or

    any of them, or for them, be preliminarily and permanently enjoined and restrained from:

    1. copying, reproducing or making any unauthorized use of the InfringedImages or any derivative thereof, in any form; and from

    2. importing, manufacturing, producing, distributing, circulating, selling,offering for sale, advertising, promoting, or displaying any simulation, reproduction, counterfeit,

    or copy of the Infringed Images or any derivative thereof, or causing and/or participating in such

    importation, manufacturing, producing, distributing, circulating, selling, offering for sale,

    advertising, promoting, or displaying any such items; and from

    3. removing any copyright management information from any other ofPlaintiffs images.

    C. Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief in the form of an order or ordersrequiring that Defendant turn over for destruction all unauthorized copies of the Infringed

    Images and all derivatives thereof (including without limitation the Infringed Images) and any

    item or thing displaying such copies, electronic and physical, in its possession, custody or

    control;

    D. An award for copyright infringement of actual damages in no less than theamount of $13,170.00 or in lieu thereof, at Plaintiffs election, statutory damages in no less than

    the amount of $750,000.00, plus attorneys fees and costs plus attorneys fees and costs;

    E. An award of statutory damages for removal of copyright management informationin the maximum amount of $2,500.00 for each intentional removal, for a maximum sum of

    $12,500.00, plus costs and attorneys fees; and

    F. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

    Dated: January 19, 2011Malibu, California

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 5 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    7/10

    6

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    COWAN, DEBAETS, ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP

    By: ______________________________

    Steven M. Weinberg

    Attorneys for PlaintiffMASTERFILE CORPORATION

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 6 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    8/10

    7

    COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    1011

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    COWANDEB

    AETSABRAHAMS&SHEPPARDLLP

    30765PacificCoastHighway,Suite411

    Malibu,California90265

    EXHIBIT A TO COMPLAINT

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 7 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    9/10

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 8 of 9

  • 8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Dean McKay: Complaint

    10/10

    Case 2:11-cv-00177-MCE -EFB Document 1 Filed 01/20/11 Page 9 of 9