1
Performance of a Branch Chain RNA In-Situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Kshitij Arora, Darcy Kerr, Krishnan K Mahadevan, Jason L Hornick, Jeffrey F Krane, Miguel N Rivera, David T Ting, Vania Nosé, Peter M Sadow, Vikram Deshpande, William C Faquin Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL PATHOLOGY HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a major etiologic agent in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), and its recognition has prognostic and predictive implications. The availability of a sensitive and specific test to assess HR- HPV status is limited. We evaluate an RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) method using branch chain technology to detect HR-HPV (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and compare its results with DNA ISH, p16 immunohistochemistry, and PCR. Design: We reviewed clinico-pathologic details for a cohort of 54 patients with HNSCC. All cases were stained with a manual RNA ISH assay ViewRNA TM technology (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), which detects HR-HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58 and 66), an automated DNA ISH assay which detects the same HR-HPV types, and an immunohistochemical assay for p16. An automated RNA ISH method was also developed, and a subset (84%, n=45) of cases were repeated on this platform. Most cases (83%, n=45) were also tested with a RNA ISH assay that detects only HR-HPV types 16 and 18. PCR based assays were used for adjudication. Results The majority of HNSCC cases were interpretable by the ISH assays: 96% (n =52) for RNA-ISH and 94% (n=51) for DNA- ISH. Sixty three percent (n=34) of samples were positive for HR- HPV using the manual RNA ISH platform, while 39% (n=21) were positive using the DNA-ISH platform. The automated RNA ISH platform performed similarly to the manual version, and the 2 platforms showed 96% concordance (n=43/45 cases). Conclusion: The branch chain RNA-ISH assay is as specific as DNA-ISH for the detection of HR-HPV in HNSCC but is more sensitive when each is compared with p16 and PCR testing. HPV 16 and 18 represented the most common viral types detected. Overall, our results support that RNA-ISH appears to be a sensitive and specific method for the detection of transcriptionally-active HR-HPV in HNSCC. A B C D E F G Take Home Message: RNA-ISH showed strong, easily interpretable signals in 96% of the cases tested. The automated version of the RNA ISH assay demonstrates high concordance with the manual version. The automated version of the RNA-ISH assay is easily implementable into the workflow of the diagnostic pathology laboratory. RNA ISH assay is more sensitive than DNA ISH assay. Figure:A-Classical HPV associated HNSCC H&E, B- P16 IHC, C & E-DNA ISH positive(C) and Negative (E), D & H-RNA ISH for HPV16,18, F & G-RNA ISH pooled HPV. Principle of RNA ISH (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) H

MASSACHUSETTS Performance of a Branch Chain RNA In-Situ ... · Kshitij Arora, Darcy Kerr, Krishnan K Mahadevan, Jason L Hornick, Jeffrey F Krane, Miguel N Rivera, David T Ting, Vania

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MASSACHUSETTS Performance of a Branch Chain RNA In-Situ ... · Kshitij Arora, Darcy Kerr, Krishnan K Mahadevan, Jason L Hornick, Jeffrey F Krane, Miguel N Rivera, David T Ting, Vania

Performance of a Branch Chain RNA In-Situ Hybridization Assay

for the Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus

in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Kshitij Arora, Darcy Kerr, Krishnan K Mahadevan, Jason L Hornick, Jeffrey F Krane, Miguel N Rivera, David T Ting, Vania Nosé, Peter M Sadow,

Vikram Deshpande, William C Faquin

Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL

PATHOLOGY

HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL

Background: • High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a

major etiologic agent in a subset of head and neck squamous

cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), and its recognition has

prognostic and predictive implications.

• The availability of a sensitive and specific test to assess HR-

HPV status is limited.

• We evaluate an RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) method using

branch chain technology to detect HR-HPV (Affymetrix,

Santa Clara, CA) and compare its results with DNA ISH, p16

immunohistochemistry, and PCR.

Design: • We reviewed clinico-pathologic details for a cohort of 54

patients with HNSCC.

• All cases were stained with a manual RNA ISH assay

ViewRNATM technology (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), which

detects HR-HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56,

58 and 66), an automated DNA ISH assay which detects the

same HR-HPV types, and an immunohistochemical assay for

p16.

• An automated RNA ISH method was also developed, and a

subset (84%, n=45) of cases were repeated on this platform.

Most cases (83%, n=45) were also tested with a RNA ISH

assay that detects only HR-HPV types 16 and 18.

• PCR based assays were used for adjudication.

Results • The majority of HNSCC cases were interpretable by the ISH

assays: 96% (n =52) for RNA-ISH and 94% (n=51) for DNA-

ISH.

• Sixty three percent (n=34) of samples were positive for HR-

HPV using the manual RNA ISH platform, while 39% (n=21)

were positive using the DNA-ISH platform.

• The automated RNA ISH platform performed similarly to the

manual version, and the 2 platforms showed 96%

concordance (n=43/45 cases).

Conclusion:

• The branch chain RNA-ISH assay is as specific as DNA-ISH

for the detection of HR-HPV in HNSCC but is more sensitive

when each is compared with p16 and PCR testing.

• HPV 16 and 18 represented the most common viral types

detected.

• Overall, our results support that RNA-ISH appears to be a

sensitive and specific method for the detection of

transcriptionally-active HR-HPV in HNSCC.

A B

C D

E F

G

Take Home Message: • RNA-ISH showed strong, easily interpretable signals in

96% of the cases tested.

• The automated version of the RNA ISH assay

demonstrates high concordance with the manual version.

• The automated version of the RNA-ISH assay is easily

implementable into the workflow of the diagnostic

pathology laboratory. • RNA ISH assay is more sensitive than DNA ISH assay.

Figure:A-Classical HPV associated HNSCC H&E, B- P16 IHC, C & E-DNA ISH

positive(C) and Negative (E), D & H-RNA ISH for HPV16,18, F & G-RNA ISH pooled HPV.

Principle of RNA ISH (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA)

H