Upload
roger-wade
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Marzano Instructional Model Overview
Toby BossESU 6
Expert PerceptionsRichard Elmore
• Education is a profession without a practice.• We haven’t developed a clear sense of what
we do, and how it relates to our core mission.
• It is no longer acceptable to say that teaching is a mysterious thing, that occurs idiosyncratically in every classroom.
• We need a systematic answer to the question of how we do what we do.
The Art & Science of Teaching 10 “design questions” teachers ask of themselves as they plan a unit of instruction.
The Art and Science of TeachingTen Design Questions – What will I do to:1. establish and communicate learning goals, track student progress, and
celebrate success?2. help students effectively interact with new knowledge?3. help students practice and deepen their understanding of new knowledge?4. help students generate and test hypotheses about new knowledge?5. engage students?6. establish or maintain classroom rules and procedures?7. recognize and acknowledge adherence and lack of adherence to classroom
rules and procedures?8. establish and maintain effective relationships with students?9. communicate high expectations for all students?10. develop effective lessons organized into a cohesive unit?
Why do we need a common language of instruction?
• Provides a method to talk about instruction • Provides a way to name, share and replicate
strategies• Provides a framework for reflection and goal
setting
Presumptions
• Teaching is complex• The model should be “robust” enough to
capture this complexity – 41 strategies• Teachers need not do them all• Gains are incremental - get better at a few
each year• Feedback using a common language of
instruction is critical
Lesson Segments
• “Thin slices” of instruction– Those involving routines– Those involving content– Those enacted on the spot
MRL Scales for Reflective Practice:General Scale
• Innovating– New strategies are created to meet needs of specific
students or class as a whole
• Applying– Strategy is used and monitored to see if it has desired
effect
• Developing– Strategy is used but in a mechanistic way
• Beginning– Strategy is used but pieces are missing
• Not Using– Strategy is called for but not used
Incremental Improvement
• It takes deliberate practice to over the course of 10 years to be an expert
• Teachers need not do all the strategies – not only one way to teach – it’s complex!
• Choose one or two for improvement with deliberate practice
• Goals for improvement should be set at appropriate stages (yearly, semester, quarter)
1. Learning Goals and Feedback2. Interacting with New Knowledge3. Practicing and Deepening4. Generating and Testing Hypotheses5. Student Engagement6. Establishing Rules and Procedures7. Adherence to Rules and Procedures8. Teacher-Student Relationships9. High Expectations
Page 7, The Art & Science of Teaching
The Art and Science of Teaching
Heflebower, Marzano Research Laboratorycutting-edge research concrete strategies sustainable success
Learning Goals and Feedback
Rules and Procedures
INVOLVES ROUTINES
ENACTED ON THE SPOT
Student Engagement
High Expectations
T
each
er/
Stu
de
nt R
ela
tion
ship
sA
dhe
rence
to R
ule
s an
d Pro
ced
ures
Generating/ Testing
Hypotheses
Practicing and
Deepening
Interacting with New
Knowledge
The Art and Science of Teaching
ADDRESSES CONTENT IN SPECIFIC WAYS
11
Lesson Segments
• “Thin slices” of instruction– Those involving routines– Those involving content– Those enacted on the spot
Learning Goals and Feedback
Rules and Procedures
INVOLVES ROUTINES
The Art and Science of Teaching
Routine Segments
Routine Segments
• Communicate learning goals• Track student progress• Celebrate success• Establish classroom rules and procedures• Organize the physical layout of the room
Discuss
• What are examples of routine segments from your practice?
• How do you:– Communicate to students the learning goal?– Establish and teach procedures?– Provide feedback?– Celebrate?– Organize the room?
Generating/ Testing
Hypotheses
Practicing and
Deepening
Interacting with New
Knowledge
The Art and Science of Teaching
Content Segments
ADDRESSES CONTENT IN SPECIFIC WAYS
16
Content Segments
• Interact with new knowledge• Practice and deepen content• Generate and test hypothesis
Learning Goals and FeedbackRules and Procedures
INVOLVES ROUTINES
Interacting with New
Knowledge
The Art and Science of Teaching
ADDRESSES CONTENT IN SPECIFIC WAYS
Please think about the look fors… Previewing activities Info presented in small chunks Students processing each chunk in small groups Students summarizing and taking notes after
content has been introduced Students reflecting on their learning Personal story shared
Learning Goals and FeedbackRules and Procedures
INVOLVES ROUTINES
ENACTED ON THE SPOT
Student Engagement
High Expectations
T
each
er/S
tude
nt R
elati
onsh
ips Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Generating/ Testing
Hypotheses
Practicing and
Deepening
Interacting With New Knowledge
The Art and Science of Teaching
ADDRESSES CONTENT IN SPECIFIC WAYS
If the segment involves knowledge practice and
deepening activities, what do you expect to see?
Students Engaged in:• Practicing skills, strategies, and processes• Examining similarities and differences
– Comparing/contrasting, – Classifying, – Creating analogies and metaphors
• Identifying Errors in Thinking• Using homework
– Guided and independent practice• Cooperative learning activities• Revising knowledge
– Reviewing/revising notes so they are useful to students and add clarity to understanding.
Learning Goals and FeedbackRules and Procedures
INVOLVES ROUTINES
ENACTED ON THE SPOT
Student Engagement
High Expectations
T
each
er/S
tude
nt R
elati
onsh
ips Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Generating/ Testing
Hypotheses
Practicing and
Deepening
Interacting With New Knowledge
The Art and Science of Teaching
ADDRESSES CONTENT IN SPECIFIC WAYS
Different Lessons and Expected Behaviors
New Knowledge– Preview– Small chunks– Students process chunks.– Summarize and take notes.– Students reflect.
Generating or Testing Hypotheses (application)
– Brief review– Students work
individually or in groups, applying content.
– Teacher as facilitator/resource provider
Moving to Application• Effective support
– Valid claims– qualifiers
• Experimental inquiry• Problem-solving• Investigations• Decision-making
P. 14
Learning Goals and FeedbackRules and Procedures
INVOLVES ROUTINES
ENACTED ON THE SPOT
Student Engagement
High Expectations
T
each
er/S
tude
nt R
elati
onsh
ips Adherence to Rules and Procedures
Generating/ Testing
Hypotheses
Practicing and
Deepening
Interacting With New Knowledge
ADDRESSES CONTENT IN SPECIFIC WAYS
Strategies Enacted on the Spot
• Engagement (Q. 5)• Relationships (Q.8)• Recognizing Rules & Procedures (Q. 6-7)• High Expectations for All (Q. 9)
Question 5: How to re-engage our students!
An Old Proverb states:
• You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink.
• We learned that maybe with “reward and punishment” the horse will do what ever we ask.
• However, consider a different goal, “How can I make the horse thirsty?”
Strategies to increase engagement• Use of games• Inconsequential competition• Manage response rates• Physical movement• Effective pacing• Student interest• Demonstrating intensity and enthusiasm
P. 15
Strategies to increase engagement• Use of games• Inconsequential competition• Manage response rates• Physical movement• Effective pacing• Demonstrating intensity and enthusiasm
Teachers asked an average of 50.6 questions; students posed only 1.8 questions in a 30 minute period.
Susskind, E. (1979), Encouraging teachers to encourage children’s curiosity: A pivotal competence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,
8, 101-106.
Research finding #1
Teachers ask many questions
Implication:
• Teachers should plan their questions before asking.
Research Finding #2:
Most teacher questions are at the lowest cognitive level—known as fact, recall, or knowledge.
Sattes,B. & Walsh, J., (2005). Quality questioning research-based practice to engage every learner.
Implication:
• Teachers should purposefully plan and ask questions that require students to engage in higher-level thinking.
Research finding #3:
• Not all students are accountable to respond to all questions.
• Teachers frequently call on volunteers, and these volunteers constitute a select group of students—especially in traditional settings.
Sattes,B. & Walsh, J., (2005). Quality questioning research-based practice to engage every learner.
Implication:
• Teachers should establish classroom norms that every student deserves an opportunity to answer questions
• All students’ answers are important.
Try some procedures that get every child involved:– Use paired responses (A/B partner response).– Call on students randomly—Popsicle sticks with names
on them.– Using response chaining.– Using choral responses.– Using quick draws.– Using hand signals (thumbs up/down).– Using response cards.– Using response technologies.
(ASOT, pp. 71–74)
Research finding #4:
• Teachers typically wait less than 1 second after asking a question before calling on a student to answer.
• They wait even less time before speaking after the student has answeredSattes,B. & Walsh, J., (2005). Quality questioning research-based practice to engage every learner.
Implication:
• Both wait times 1 and 2 promote student thinking and foster more students’ formulating answers to more questions.
Research finding #5:
Teachers often accept incorrect answers without probing; They frequently answer their own questions.
Sattes,B. & Walsh, J., (2005). Quality questioning research-based practice to engage every learner.
Implication:
• Teachers should seek to understand incorrect or incomplete answers more completely by gently guiding student thinking with appropriate probes.
Research finding #6:
Students ask very few content-related questions.
Sattes,B. & Walsh, J., (2005). Quality questioning research-based practice to engage every learner.
Implications:
• Value student questions• Help students learn to formulate good questions, and
• Make time for student questions.
Active Questioning, 1995
From Passive to Active--Types of Questions
(Johnson, Active Questioning, 1995)
Quantity Questions
From– How many doors or
windows in this room?– What is square root of
16? – Name the members of
the United Nations.
To– What are the possible ways
to get out of this room?– List ways you can think to
say “4” or “-4”?– What concern would you
take to the United Nations and why?
Classroom Instruction that Works, 2001
Compare/Contrast Questions(move from concrete to abstract)
• How is _________like__________?• How is ________different from_________?• Seeing/believing• Freedom/boundaries• Human brain/computer• Building a building/building a relationship• National Party/Labor Party• Use of analogies
Questioning Makes the Difference, Johnson, 1990
How can I assess my questioning style?
• Record a complete day of teaching• Review in privacy• For every right/wrong answer (convergent) type of
question give yourself a check• For every divergent (multiple options) question,
give yourself an X• Add the total of checks and Xs• How long did you wait for responses?
– Hunter research 2.5 seconds—try 5 seconds or more.
Learning Goals and FeedbackRules and Procedures
Involves Routines
Enacted on the Spot
Student Engagement
High Expectations
T
each
er–
Stu
de
nt R
ela
tion
ship
s Ad
here
nce to
Ru
les a
nd P
roce
dures
Generating/ Testing
Hypotheses
Practicing and
Deepening
Interacting With New
Knowledge
The Art and Science of Teaching
Addresses Content in Specific Ways
Design Question Seven
What will I do to recognize and acknowledge adherence and lack of adherence to classroom rules and
procedures?
Action Steps• Simple verbal and nonverbal acknowledgement• Tangible recognition when appropriate• Involve the home.• Be “with it”.• Direct cost• Group contingency (very limited use)• Home contingency• Strategy for high-intensity situations
The Child Often Teaches the Adult to Behave
Inappropriately Faster Than the Adult Teaches the Child to Behavior Appropriately.
Secondary StudentsWhat do your best teachers do to help us learn?
• They are positive and listen to us. – One student said, “I like it when they actively ask me what I
think.” – One student said, “I like teachers who exhibit STORM—
supportive, tolerant, respect students, look us in the eyes, know me as a person, listen to us….things like that.”
– Three students piggy-backed on that comment to say, “They don’t need to yell at us.” Another commented, “They don’t want us to be rude, yet it feels like they are rude to us sometimes.”
– Another said, “I appreciate teachers who have a fun side—they make you want to learn.”
Question 8--RelationshipsAction Steps pg. 12
• Know something about each student.• Engage in behaviors that indicate affection.• Use student interests.• Use appropriate physical behaviors.• Use humor when appropriate.• Consistently enforce positive and negative
consequences.• Project a sense of emotional objectivity.• Maintain a cool exterior.
Question 9
What will I do to communicate high expectations for all students?
“In the Classroom” The Art and Science of Teaching
1. Identify your expectation levels for students.2. Identify differential treatment of low
expectancy students.3. Revise your thinking about low expectancy
students.4. Push high expectations for low expectancy
students.
On the Spot Segments
• Student engagement• Adherence to rules and procedures• Teacher –student relationships• High expectations