Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Marking the 30th
Marking the 30th anniversary of the Chornobyl disaster in Ukraine - the worst nuclear catastrophe in history.
A one-day CEEL event in partnership with the: • Central and Eastern European London Review• Embassy of Ukraine • Association of Ukrainians in GB• Association of Ukrainian
Women• Anglo-Belarusian Society
“
”
In the morning when I woke up, I did not know something had happened until I went
out of my home….As soon as I went down the stairs of the apartment block and out through the door into the street, I was aware at once that something was wrong. I could feel on my face a tingling as though it was raining
although it was not. I felt also a taste of metal in my mouth, and my eyes began to water….
As I turned the corner which would bring me almost to the power station entrance, I stopped. Right in front of me was a reactor, and it was on fire….among the smoke above
its roof flames were dancing,… red and green and yellow and blue. They were not dancing wildly or with excitement, they were swaying
- almost merrily, to the tune which was suddenly in my head… It was an allegro; the flames were dancing in a stately way, and this was terrifying to me, because it seemed I can
only say quite normal… Nadia Larova, newspaper editor
26 ApRiL 1986 was the date when the
world learned the name of Chornobyl.
in the last 30 years it has become a synonym both for a terrible technological disaster and ecological catas-trophe on a global scale.
This tragedy has taught mankind that technological progress can produce a bitter harvest. Chornobyl has become a reproach to the past and - at the same time – a painful warning for generations to come.
The whole world realisedthehorrificconsequences of this disaster, one which produced hundreds of times more radia-tion than the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. And today, 30 years later, Chornobyl is once again demanding the world’s attention, reminding us of the dangers of the peaceful atom and how vigilant the world needs to be in its interaction with
technology and the environment.
These consequences cannot be ignored as they still affect the health of all those who live on the contami-nated territories and need medical assis-tance, those who were resettled and need moral and humanitarian help, as well as children who in the third genera-tion suffer from cancer and immune system diseases.
We are very grateful to all friends of Ukraine in the United Kingdom who continue to help us in alleviating the consequences of the Chornobyl catas-trophe.
Today, the construction ofanewsafeconfine-ment at the Chornobyl Nuclear power plant is underway.Theconfine-ment, due for comple-tion next year, will isolate the destroyed power generating unit from the surrounding environment.
The imperatives of strengthening nuclear safety and overcoming the consequences of the Chornobyl catas-trophe will encourage more active involve-ment among the world community in solving the remaining problems in this sphere.
i believe that this year’s commemorative events will open up a new phase of international cooperation aimed at turning the “Shelter” into an ecologically safe system. in the very near future Chornobyl will be known not only as the site of a nuclear disaster, but as a world-renowned scientificandresearchcentre which will help keep the world safe: an unexpected lesson of hope from a nuclear tragedy.
Chornobyl: 30 Years On Foreword by the Ambassador of Ukraine to
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern irelandHer Excellency Mrs Natalia Galibarenko
“The odds of a meltdown are one in 10,000 years. The
plants have safe and reliable controls that
are protected from any breakdown with three
safety systems”. Vitaly Sklyarov,
Minister of Power of Ukraine, February 1986.
“An accident has occurred at the
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, and one
of the reactors has been damaged. Steps
are being taken to deal with the situation, and aid is being given
to those affected. The Government has
formed a commission of enquiry”.
Soviet television news report, in its entirety,
28 April 1986.
EvEN TodAy, anyone visiting pripyat - the ghost-town which once housed 50,000 residents in the
shadow of the Chornobyl power-station - can see what a well-designed place it was.
Close to forests and lakes and on the banks of the pripyat River, it laid on everything for its citizens: playgrounds, restaurants, a cinema, a theatre, good schools, good health services, an olympic-size swimming pool. Houses were plentiful, shops were well-stocked. it was a genuine community of nuclear workers and their families, and getting a job there was good fortune indeed.
All this ended at 1.23 am on 26 April 1986, when an experiment to see what would happen to Reactor 4 if the power were switched off went horribly wrong. The reactor heated up to 10 times its normal level, causing a massive power-surge. The resulting explosion blasted 50 tonnes of radioactive matter into the atmos-phere,whilethefirebeneathitwouldrage and then smoulder perilously for weeks.
Thefirefighterswhoappearedonthe scene a few minutes after the blow-out proved unable to extin-guish it, for this was a new kind of blaze against which conventional efforts were useless. So too were their uniforms: deprived of protective clothing, many were to die lingering and agonising deaths a few days later at Moscow’s special Hospital 6 for radiation patients - a place to which many ‘Chernobylites’ return by necessity even today.
Belarus and Ukraine were the two countries worst affected by the Chernobyl disaster, but the radiation cloud blew right across Europe, also contaminating - among other countries - Russia, Scandinavia, Switzerland and Wales.
in pripyat, effectively the Ground Zero of the tragedy, radiation levels rose to 600,000 times higher than normal, its 50,000 residents being evacuated - a catastrophic day late - in a single afternoon, transported on over 1,000 buses ‘borrowed’ from Kyiv. Told they were leaving the city and their homes for just three days, they were never to return.
By 5 May, another 80,000 from the Exclusion Zone had joined them. Houses built by their owners’ families and lived in for generations were abandonedforever,theirfixturesand furnishings now dangerously radioactive. And, as the sky began to discharge radioactive rain and forests surrounding pripyat turned a livid and eerie shade of red, a massive damage limitation exercise got underway,
Afleetofhelicoptersflewover1800sorties to dump a mixture of sand and boric acid, in an attempt to extinguish thefire.Conscripts-‘liquidators’-were retained for months in perilous conditions,forced-ajobthatdefiesdescription - to hose the radioac-tive dust off the houses and shoot the domestic animals left in them, to strip the upper layer of earth from the 40km Chornobyl Exclusion Zone and bury it in the ground.
others were despatched to shovel debris from the power-plant’s roof
Another kind of war
back into the reactor, taking the most rapid of turns, since more than 40 seconds in its proximity could lead to their deaths. They complained of dizziness, burning eyes, a strange metallic taste in the mouth and – because they too lacked adequate protective clothing - were told that their best defence against the effects of radiation was simply to up their vodka intake. Many were subsequently to die.
drawing parallels with Afghanistan - for Chornobyl was another kind of war - one soldier remarked grimly on the major difference between them: home from Afghanistan, you had survived; it was when you got back from Chornobyl, in the months and years that followed, that the real problems started.
This was the Chornobyl clear-up operation: it affected thousands and involved countless unsung heroes, manyofwhomsacrificedtheirlivesto prevent a second, even worse, explosion from the reactor: one which - Secret Soviet documents later revealed - would have devastated half of Europe.
But there was also the Chornobyl cover-up operation - a cynical and disreputable enterprise. As Soviet authorities laboured to keep their citizens as ill-informed as possible, a May day Celebration in Kyiv was allowed to go ahead in the open air, under radiation-levels thousands of times their normal levels.
Soviet television gave the Chornobyl explosion - the worst nuclear disaster in history - scant mention in their news reports. it was a full 18 days before Gorbachev addressed the matter - and the nation - on television.
As an investigation subsequently got underway, steps were taken to ensure the explosion was blamed on the errors of a few individuals rather than design and construction faults in the reactor itself.
‘Culprits’ were jailed, careers were ruined - seldom the right ones - and on 25 April 1988, almost two years to the day after the catastrophe, Chief investigator valery Legasov, over-burdened with guilt and unable any longer to bear the lies and half-truths he had been forced to present to the public as ‘facts’, hanged himself in his Moscow home.
yet, for all that the cover-up had intended,theramificationswouldbe felt worldwide. Chornobyl, Gorbachev later admitted, was perhaps ‘the real cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union.’
Estimates vary widely on how many have died as a direct result of the Chornobyl tragedy: no two sources of information agree, while Soviet state records deliberately obfuscated figures,refusingtorecogniseallbutthose who had died at the outset.
The Ukrainian government has estimated deaths among clean-up workers alone from 7-8,000, while Greenpeace states that as many as 200,000 have died or will die from cancers triggered by the effects of the disaster.Yetthislastfigureishotlycontested by organisations like the World Health organisation and the Chernobyl Forum, who have put the estimate at nearer 2% of that number. predictions from different sources thus range from 1 million down to just a few thousand - a staggering discrepancy, bringing home how controversial a battleground Chornobyl still is.
Undeniably, life is slowly returning to the region. The ghost-town of pripyat - recently deemed uninhab-itable for 200,000 years - now hosts daily tours bussed in from Kyiv, whose customers are mesmerised by the town’s abandoned schools and hospitals, the Soviet posters which still hang on the walls, and the rusted and derelict funfair whose Big Wheel has become the city’s best known icon.
There are approximately 3,000 workersstillstaffingtheZone,andabout 200 ‘resettlers’ living there, their lifespans seemingly unaffected in a region where, just 20 years afterwards, radiation levels are often lower than in the city of Kyiv. Nature has bloomed here, with burgeoning forests, and thriving populations of wolves and wild horses.
A new sarcophagus - the largest moveable structure ever created on land - is being built at Chornobyl to house the ruins of Reactor 4, ensuring that the area is safe from more emissions for 100 years. And every May, on victory day, former residents of pripyat return to the city, driving in from the areas of Ukraine to which the catastrophe scattered them, bringing picnics for an annual - and almost celebratory - reunion.
Thus we gather, nearly 30 years to the day after the Chornobyl nuclear disaster of 26 April 1986, to ask, among other things, a key question: Chornobyl - unparalleled nuclear catastrophe? or strange story of hope?
Robin Ashenden Central and Eastern European
London Review
Tim
eline
Com
plet
ion
of c
onst
ruct
ion
of C
horn
obyl
Uni
t 4. P
lant
goe
s in
to p
rodu
ctio
n on
20
Dec
embe
r.D
ecem
ber
198
3
Min
iste
r of E
nerg
y, A
nato
liy M
ayor
ets,
dec
rees
that
info
rmat
ion
on a
ny a
dver
se e
ffect
s ca
used
by
the
ener
gy in
dust
ry o
n em
ploy
ees,
inha
bita
nts
and
the
envi
ronm
ent,
are
unsu
itabl
e fo
r pub
licat
ion
by n
ewsp
aper
s, ra
dio
or te
levi
sion
.A
pri
l 198
5
Lite
ratu
rna
Ukr
aina
(Ukr
aini
an L
itera
ture
) pub
lishe
s an
art
icle
writ
ten
by M
s Ly
ubov
Kov
alev
ska,
a P
ripya
t jou
rnal
ist w
ho c
ites,
am
ong
othe
r thi
ngs,
fa
ulty
con
stru
ctio
n, w
orkm
ansh
ip a
nd c
oncr
ete
at th
e Ch
orno
byl P
lant
. “Th
e fa
ilure
s he
re w
ill b
e re
paid
, rep
aid
over
the
deca
des
to c
ome”
.27
Mar
ch 1
986
25 A
pri
l 198
6
Prep
arat
ions
are
und
erw
ay fo
r a te
st to
dis
cove
r how
Uni
t 4’s
out
put i
s af
fect
ed w
hen
pow
er to
the
Uni
t is
shut
off.
The
test
is la
rgel
y a
prec
au-
tiona
ry m
easu
re fo
r out
brea
ks o
f war
or n
atur
al c
atas
trop
hes.
Lev
els
of ra
dioa
ctiv
ity fa
ll to
dan
gero
usly
low
leve
ls a
nd, a
gain
st a
ll sa
fety
pro
cedu
res,
vi
tal e
nerg
y-sh
utdo
wn
syst
ems
have
bee
n di
sabl
ed. T
here
are
pro
test
s in
the
cont
rol r
oom
abo
ut th
e da
nger
s of
the
imm
inen
t tes
t, bu
t the
se a
re
over
-rid
den.
26 A
pri
l 198
6
01.2
1: T
he te
st h
as g
one
ahea
d, b
ut p
robl
ems
are
rapi
dly
deve
lopi
ng. P
ower
has
sur
ged
in th
e re
acto
r and
coo
ling
syst
ems
have
faile
d. M
assi
ve
pres
sure
insi
de th
e re
acto
r is
send
ing
shoc
kwav
es th
roug
h th
e bu
iidin
g’s
stru
ctur
e.
01.2
3:44
: Th
e re
acto
r rea
ches
120
tim
es it
s no
rmal
leve
ls. I
t exp
lode
s, v
iole
ntly
dis
lodg
ing
the
1,00
0 to
n lid
on
top
of it
. A s
econ
d ex
plos
ion
follo
ws,
sh
ootin
g bu
rnin
g de
bris
and
radi
oact
ive
mat
ter 1
km in
to th
e sk
y. F
ires
are
star
ted
on th
e ro
of o
f Cho
rnob
yl U
nit 3
.
01.3
5: F
irem
en s
trug
gle
to e
xtin
guis
h th
e fir
es a
t Uni
t 3. A
gain
st th
e fir
e in
Uni
t 4 it
self,
thei
r effo
rts
are
usel
ess.
Cons
truc
tion
of th
e to
wn
of P
ripya
t, on
e of
9 “
atom
tow
ns”
begi
ns, t
o be
inha
bite
d by
futu
re e
mpl
oyee
s of
the
nucl
ear p
ower
pla
nts.
1970
Dis
cuss
ions
take
pla
ce in
Kyi
v ab
out t
he ty
pe o
f nuc
lear
pla
nt to
be
built
at C
horn
obyl
. Cho
rnob
yl’s
dire
ctor
, Bry
ukha
nov,
pro
pose
s co
nstr
uctio
n of
Pr
essu
rized
Wat
er R
eact
ors
(PW
Rs).
He
info
rms
the
Ukr
aine
Min
iste
r of E
nerg
y, A
leks
ei M
akuk
hin,
that
an
RBM
K (a
boi
ling
wat
er re
acto
r) re
leas
es
fort
y tim
es m
ore
radi
atio
n th
an a
PW
R. T
he s
cien
tist A
lekz
andr
ov o
ppos
es th
is, s
ayin
g th
at th
e RB
MK-
100
0 w
as n
ot o
nly
the
safe
st re
acto
r, bu
t it
also
pro
duce
d th
e ch
eape
st e
lect
ricity
. On
thes
e gr
ound
s, it
was
dec
ided
that
the
RBM
K pr
essu
re tu
be re
acto
rs w
ould
be
built
.
1972
09.3
0: T
he F
orsm
ark
Nuc
lear
Pow
er P
lant
, Sw
eden
, reg
iste
rs a
sta
rtlin
g ris
e in
the
regi
on’s
radi
oact
ivity
.
21.0
2: M
osco
w T
V ne
ws
anno
unce
s - i
n a
14 s
econ
d br
oadc
ast -
that
an
acci
dent
has
occ
ured
at t
he C
horn
obyl
Nuc
lear
Pow
er P
lant
: “M
easu
res
are
bein
g ta
ken
to e
limin
ate
cons
eque
nces
of t
he a
ccid
ent.
Aid
is b
eing
giv
en to
thos
e af
fect
ed. A
gov
ernm
ent c
omm
issi
on h
as b
een
set u
p”.
28 A
pri
l 198
6
Tass
car
ries
a go
vern
men
t sta
tem
ent d
enyi
ng w
este
rn re
port
s of
mas
s ca
sual
ties.
Onl
y tw
o pe
ople
hav
e di
ed d
urin
g th
e ac
cide
nt, i
t cla
ims
whi
le 1
97
have
bee
n ho
spita
lised
.30
Ap
ril 1
986
1 M
ay 1
986
The
win
d - h
ither
to b
low
ing
the
radi
atio
n-cl
oud
over
Bel
arus
, now
cha
nges
dire
ctio
n an
d be
gins
to c
arry
it to
war
ds U
krai
nian
cap
ital K
yiv,
whe
re, a
s in
the
Bela
russ
ian
capi
tal M
insk
, ann
ual M
ay D
ay c
eleb
ratio
ns a
re h
eld
in th
e op
en a
irin
radi
atio
n le
vels
thou
sand
s of
tim
es h
ighe
r tha
n us
ual.
2 M
ay 1
986
Smou
lerin
g m
ater
ials
in th
e re
acto
r - a
t a te
mpe
ratu
re o
f mor
e th
an 1
200
C - b
egin
to b
urn
dow
n th
roug
h th
e re
acto
r flo
or.
Shou
ld th
ey p
enet
rate
in
to th
e bu
bblin
g po
ols
of w
ater
ben
eath
, the
re is
an
extr
emel
y hi
gh ri
sk o
f the
rmal
exp
losi
on -
a ca
tast
roph
e fa
r wor
se th
an th
at o
f 26
Apr
il: o
ne
that
will
raze
Min
sk to
the
grou
nd a
nd m
ake
half
of E
urop
e un
inha
bita
ble.
Thr
ee e
ngin
eers
, Ana
toliy
Ana
nenk
o, V
aler
i Bez
palo
v an
d Bo
ris B
aran
ov
know
ingl
y sa
crifi
ce th
emse
lves
to s
cuba
-div
e be
neat
h th
e re
acto
r, op
en th
e sl
uice
gat
es fr
om w
ithin
and
dra
in th
em. T
hey
died
a fe
w h
ours
late
r. ‘A
30
km z
one
arou
nd th
e re
acto
r is
desi
gnat
ed fo
r eva
cuat
ion
(90,
000
peop
le)’.
Sch
ools
in G
omel
and
Kyi
v ar
e cl
osed
and
chi
ldre
n ar
e ev
acua
ted.
The
tota
l num
ber o
f tho
se n
ow fo
rced
to u
proo
t the
mse
lves
reac
hes
500,
000.
6 M
ay 1
986
A m
onth
aft
er th
e ac
cide
nt th
e da
nger
is n
ot y
et o
ver.
A c
oncr
ete
stru
ctur
e - t
he C
horn
obyl
‘Sar
coph
agus
’ - is
dec
reed
to e
ntom
b Re
acto
r 4. I
t is
com
plet
ed in
Dec
embe
r tha
t yea
r, w
ith s
cien
tists
d st
atin
g th
at it
will
rem
ain
effe
ctiv
e fo
r 20-
30 y
ears
.27
May
198
6
A c
ontr
act i
s si
gned
for a
New
Saf
e Co
nfin
emen
t with
Fre
nch
cons
ortiu
m N
ovar
ska?
who
will
bui
ld a
sec
ond
sarc
opha
gus
- the
larg
est m
ovea
ble
stru
ctur
e on
land
- to
sec
ure
Reac
tor 4
for t
he n
ext 1
00 y
ears
. Its
com
plet
ion
is n
ow s
ched
uled
for l
ate
2017
.20
07
With
spec
ial t
hank
s to
the
Cho
rnob
yl G
alle
ry (c
hern
obyl
galle
ry.c
om)
14.0
0: T
he e
vacu
atio
n of
Pry
piat
tow
n be
gins
. 1,2
00 K
yiv
buse
s ev
acua
te 5
0,00
0 re
side
nts.
The
y ar
e to
ld th
ey a
re le
avin
g fo
r ‘th
ree
days
’.
10.0
0: H
elic
opte
rs b
egin
the
first
of 1
800
sort
ies
to b
omba
rd th
e fir
e in
Uni
t 4 w
ith s
and,
bor
ic a
cid
and,
fina
lly, l
ead.
27 A
pri
l 198
6
Mor
e th
an tw
o w
eeks
aft
er th
e di
sast
er, S
ovie
t Lea
der M
ikha
il G
orba
chev
mak
es fi
rst p
ublic
sta
tem
ent o
n Ru
ssia
n TV
New
s. H
e tr
ies
to e
xpla
in w
hat
happ
ened
and
crit
icis
es th
e W
est f
or u
sing
the
acci
dent
to la
unch
an
“unr
estr
aine
d an
ti-So
viet
cam
paig
n”.
14 M
ay 1
986
Nea
rly 3
0 ye
ars
afte
r the
dis
aste
r, a
huge
slid
ing
arch
str
uctu
re d
esig
ned
to p
reve
nt d
eadl
y ra
diat
ion
spew
ing
from
the
site
is n
earin
g co
mpl
etio
n.
The
30,0
00 to
nne
‘New
Saf
e Co
nfin
emen
t’ ar
ch –
the
wor
ld’s
larg
est l
and-
base
d m
ovin
g st
ruct
ure
– w
ill b
e pu
lled
over
the
form
er C
horn
obyl
nuc
lear
po
wer
pla
nt to
con
tain
radi
atio
n fr
om th
e da
mag
ed re
acto
r for
the
next
100
yea
rs.
2016
Voices fromChernobyl“We were leaving - I took some earth from my mother’s
grave, put it in a little sack.
Got down on my knees: ‘Forgive us for leaving you.’”
“There was a strange sensation in the air. At first I could not tell
what it was: the air felt somehow heavy and still, a feeling of unreality. Then I was aware of something else: there was not only the stillness but a complete silence,
no sound of any kind anywhere. No birds were singing, not one.
“We didn’t understand
then that the peaceful atom could kill, that man is helpless
before the laws of physics”.
“
”
‘What’s it like, radiation? Maybe they show it in the movies? Have you seen it? Is it white,
or what? What colour is it? Some
people say it has no colour and no smell,
and other people say that it’s black. Like earth. But if
it’s colourless, then it’s like God. God is everywhere, but you can’t see Him. They scare us! The apples are hanging in the garden, the leaves are on the trees, the potatoes are in the fields. I
don’t think there was any Chernobyl, they
made it up.
Sources: UNEP/GRID-Arendal, European Environ-ment Agency; AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Polution Issues, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 1998, Oslo; European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP; Co-operative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long range transmission of air polutants in Europe, 1999. Adapted from Le Monde Diplomatique, 1999.
Programme14.30 Welcome speeches14.45 FiLM SCREENiNG: Chernobyl: Surviving
Disaster (Nick Murphy, BBC, 2006). The hard-hitting BBC docu-drama about
the explosion at Chornobyl Reactor 4 and its subsequent cover-up, starring Ade Edmondson.
15.45 interval. 16.00 FiLM SCREENiNG: Babushkas of
Chernobyl (Bogart & Morris, 2015). Haunting, affirmative documentary on a group
of elderly ladies defying the authorities to inhabit the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. Winner at the Woodstock and Los Angeles Film Festivals.
17.30 interval. 18.00 ‘A Solitary Human voice’ from Nobel
Laureate Svetlana Alexievich’s voices from Chernobyl, read by Anamaria Marinca with live harp accompaniment from Alina Bzezhinska
19.00 interval. 19.30 panel: Chornobyl - unparalleled nuclear
catastrophe? Or strange story of hope? Chair: Robin Ashenden - Editor of Central
and Eastern European London Review Panelists: Alla Kravchuk - Radio
documentary-maker and former resident of pripyat, Chornobyl.
Balthasar Lindauer - deputy-director of EBRd nuclear safety programme.
Anna Reid - Author and Ukrainian Specialist. Professor Gerry Thomas - Specialist in
effects of nuclear radiation.
Nick Murphy - writer and director
Chernobyl: Surviving Disaster (BBC, 2006).NickMurphyisaBritishfilmandtelevision director. He is best known for directingthefilmsThe Awakening (2011) (also writer) and Blood (2012).
Holly Morris -co-producer / co-director
Babushkas of Chernobyl (2015). Holly Morris is an American author, documentary director/producer and television presenter, from Chicago illinois. As producer and correspondent, she has made programs in Bangladesh, Borneo, Brazil, Cuba, india, iran and Syria, among other countries.
in 2010 Morris published A Country of Women, a chronicle of the ‘self-settlers’ who live inside Chornobyl Exclusion Zone, going on to produce and direct (with Anne Bogart) the 2015 documentary Babushkas of Chernobyl.
Anne Bogart - co-producer / co-director
HasfilmedaroundtheworldforthePBStravel series Globe Trekker for 12 years. She has produced and directed programming for both French and English-based broadcasters, including the long-running pop culture magazine Eurotrash in the U.K. Bogart has written for W magazine, The New york Times, The Los Angeles Times, Women’s Wear daily, and Elle decor magazine. She divides her time between London and Los Angeles.
Svetlana Alexievich - author
Born in 1948 in the west Ukrainian town of Stanislaviv to a Belarusian father and a Ukrainian mother - subsequently growing
up in Belarus. She worked extensively as a journalist, and soon became known for non-fictionnarrative,inbooksaboutSoviethistory shaped from oral testimony. Her most notable works in English translation include Zinky Boys: Soviet Voices from a Forgotten War (about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan), and Voices from Chernobyl (1997), oral testimonies from survivors of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 - republished by penguin on April 21st 2016 as Chernobyl Prayer: A Chronicle of the Future.
in 2015, Alexievich was awarded the Nobel prize for Literature, ‘for her polyphonic writings, a monument to suffering and courage in our time.’
Anamaria Marinca - reader
Anamaria Marinca is a Romanian actress. She made her screen debut with theChannel4filmSex Traffic, for which she won the British Academy Television Award for Best Actress. Marinca is also known for her performance in 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (Mungiu, 2007), earning several awards for her performance, and was nominated for the European Film Award for Best Actress, London Film Critics Circle Award for Actress of the year, Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award for Best Actress and National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Actress. in 2008, at the 58th Berlin international Film Festival, she was presented the Shooting Stars Award by the European Film promotion.
Alina Bzhezhinska - harpist and musical accompanist
Alina studied at the F. Chopin Academy of Music in Warsaw, poland (Masters in Arts), and The University of Arizona, USA (Masters in Music performance). She has performed with many major European orchestras including the young World Symphony orchestra, the National opera in Warsaw and Scottish opera. Her London appearances include Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre, BBC Radio 3 and London Jazz Festival. She has had the honour of playing at the European parliament, and at the Queen’s 80th-birthday celebrations at Balmoral Castle. She is a harp tutor at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland, and has recorded a solo-album Harp Recital (2008).
SCREENiNGS
REAdiNGS
ABoUT THE pARTiCipANTS
Robin Ashenden - Event Producer / Chair of Panel
Robin Ashenden is founder and editor of Central and Eastern European London Review (ceel.org.uk). He has an MA in Soviet Travel Writing and worked for several years as a travel journalist (Sunday Times Travel, Wanderlust & the Guardian), specialising in Central and Eastern Europe. in 2009, he received a writer’s award from the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust to travel in and write about the post-communist countries of Central Europe.
Oksana Kyzyma - Co-Producer
oksana Kyzyma is a young diplomat from Kyiv Ukraine, currently working as press Attache of the Ukrainian Embassy in London. She is also vice-president of the diplomatic press Attaches Association of London, a professional organisation uniting diplomats from all around the world working in the UK. in 2015 she received the diplomat of the year Award, for outstanding contribution to the press corps.
Central and Eastern European London Review
Central and Eastern European London Re-view (ceel.org.uk) was founded in May 2014, to cover any and all CEE cultural events in the capital, with news, reviews, interviews andatotalculturaldiary.Itisthefirstsitetobring together on one resource the cultural programmes of about a dozen countries; it has now published more than 300 articles, listed about 1,000 events, and has over 50 contribu-tors - many of them from CEE countries.
its patron is the celebrated CEE historian professor Timothy Garton Ash, and Chorno-byl30isthefirsteventwhich,incooperationwith its partners, CEEL has organised.
The Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain (AUGB)
The largest representative body for Ukrainians and those of Ukrainian descent.
Founded in 1946, it exists to develop, promote and support the interests of the Ukrainian community in the UK.
The AUGB operates a network of branches across Great Britain, has a highly respected reference library and archive in London and a small gallery and gift shop. it publishes a fortnightly bilingual Ukrainian-English newspaper ‘Ukrayinska dumka’, established in 1945, and has published numerous books on Ukrainian history and culture.
it works closely with other community organisations in the UK and abroad including government and academic institu-tions on exhibitions and joint projects.
Since its foundation, the Association’s members have donated generously to humanitarian projects in Ukraine, including most recently, to patriot defence, a charity which trains Ukrainian doctors to interna-tionalstandardsoffirstresponsetraumacareand rehabilitation for those who have been physically and psychologically damaged in theconflictinEasternUkraine.
Association of Ukrainian Women in Great Britain
Formed in 1947 to unite Ukrainian women of all ages to foster Ukrainian culture and traditions and inform the world about the plight of Ukrainian women, including political prisoners, in the then Soviet Union.
The Association maintains a unique Folk Art museum in Manchester and operates through a network of branches and volunteers throughout Great Britain. it has campaigned for the release of women political prisoners and, from 1990, provided humanitarian aid for the most vulnerable and needy in Ukraine.
Anglo-Belarusian Society
Founded in 1954 with the object of the diffusion, interchange and publication of knowledge relating to the Belarusian people, their land, history and their culture in the UK.
The Society publishes a yearbook – The Journal of Byelorussian Studies and, more recently it has organised or co-organised various lectures, commemorations, recitals andbookandfilmpresentationsrelatingtoBelarus and its people.
ABoUT THE oRGANiSERS
Alla Kravchuk
Alla Kravchuk is a Ukrainian opera soloist, singing teacher and latterly documen-tary-maker on pripyat region. She trained at the Kyiv Conservatory in her native Ukraine before moving to Germany, where she appeared in numerous produc-tions and sang a wide variety of roles (in May 2016 she will appear at Stuttgart opera House in Mussorgsky’s rarely-performed ‘The Marriage’). She now lives in London, and has just broadcast a two-part Radio 4 documentary about a return to Chornobyl - where her parents worked both before and after the disaster thirty years ago.
Balthasar Lindauer
Balthasar Lindauer is deputy director of the European Bank for Reconstruction and development’s Nuclear Safety department, which carries out projects aimed at improving safety in nuclear facilities, assisting with the safe decommission-ing of nuclear power plants and providing facilities for the safe management of radioactive waste in Eastern Europe and countries of the former Soviet Union. He joined the EBRd in 2002. prior to that he was in charge of international nuclear safety cooperation at the German Ministry of Environment and worked for a Ger-man technical safety organization. He studied in paris and Berlin and graduated from Freie Universitaet Berlin.
Anna Reid
Anna Reid holds a master’s degree in Russian history and reform economics from London University’s School of Slavonic and East European Studies. She was the Kiev correspondent for the Economist and the daily Telegraph from 1993to1995.Herfirstbook,Borderland:AJourneythroughtheHistoryofthe Ukraine, was published to wide acclaim in 1997, and she has subsequently written The Shaman’s Coat: A Native History of Siberia (2002) and Leningrad: Tragedy of a City under Siege, 1941-44 (2011). Ms. Reid lives in London.
Professor Gerry Thomas
Gerry Thomas is professor of Molecular pathology at imperial College London, director of the newly established West London Genome Medicine Centre, prin-cipal Scientist for the Wales Cancer Bank and director of both imperial College Healthcare Tissue Bank and the Chernobyl Tissue Bank. Her main research area focusesonthemolecularpathologyofthyroidcancerandhowthisisinfluencedby aetiology and age at diagnosis. She strongly believes that public involvement and information is a key part of academic research, and is actively involved in the public communication of research, particularly with respect to radiation protection and bio-banking.
* * *
pANELLiSTS
“The last blow from the USSR to fall onBelaruswasinflictedwithCherno-byl…. The Kremlin tried to conceal the mere fact of the disaster and never admitted the scale of the damage. The current Regime in Belarus followed the Kremlin’s lead”.
Andrei Sannikov, former Bela-rusian Deputy Foreign Minister and political prisoner, now Leader of the European Belarus Civil Campaign
Working in the zone affected by both chemical and psychological fallout from
the Chernobyl disaster in the Republic of Belarus made a permanent mark on mine and others’ souls.
As Aberdeen’s international Relations Officerin1990IvisitedHomielRegion in Belarus - twinned with Aberdeen - including the highly contaminated areas, accompanied bymedicalandscientificexpertstoestablish how the City of Aberdeen could help.
i spent time talking to people, and saw the level of fear and distrust of information from the authorities about what was safe and what was not.
Thiswasanareathatwasofficiallyevacuated, with services cut off as a consequence. The trouble was, the people were still there, belongings packed, trucks loaded and waiting…just waiting. one old lady said she was digging vegetables out of the ground with her bare hands. She had done this when the Germans invaded but at least then she could see the enemy. This too was an enemy but invisible, contami-nating and eroding the very fabric of the community.
it was easy to get caught up in the emotion of it all and focus all efforts
onsomehowfindingwaystoeasesuffering. in the Zone, when you actually talked to people you did not see victims, you saw survivors, a resourceful community well accustomed to managing against considerableoddstofindtheirownsolutions to their own problems. our well-meaning efforts were devaluing those resources by failing even to perceive their existence.
Western charities, albeit motivated by genuine compassion tended to focus on “victims” with negative images to match. To counteract this, collabo-rative partnerships were formed between Belarusian and Scottish organisations at all levels - community, cultural,scientific,educational.We reframed how we viewed the Belarusian people, not as problems tobefixedorbundlesofneedstobemet but as active and equal partners indefiningsharedsolutionstosharedissues.
one continues to be amazed at the resilience and inventiveness of the Belarusian people. despite the realities of the Lukashenka regime there’s a growing generation of social innovatorswhoareusingthebenefitsof new technology to connect people and promote public participation in civil society.
Such people are anything but passive victims: they are agents of change and bring hope of a new future for Belarus, aware of what their country went through on 26 April 1986 - but not definedbyit.
ЖывеБеларусь!
Alison Cameron Secretary,
Anglo Belarus Society, London
Definingsharedsolutions
THE ASSoCiATioN of Ukrainian Women in Great Britain (AUW) established
the Ukrainian Mother and Chil-dren’s Appeal Fund in 1990, and wasthefirstwesternorganisa-tion to send humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
in March 1990 it sent two 38-tonne lorries of aid for those affected by the Chornobyl dis-aster: over 1000 parcels of food and clothing for resettled families, and several tonnes of medical supplies, including over a million child-sized disposable syringes for the 14th Children’s Hospital in Kyiv, which treated the majority of children with cancers and other ill-nesses resulting from the disaster.
Thefirsttrancheofhumanitarianaid was followed by three further lorries in 1992, for over 1000 resettled families, along with leu-kaemia medication and antibiotics for the 14th Children’s Hospital; three lorries in 1993, with food and clothing for 800 elderly people who had returned to live in the Chornobyl exclusion zone, together with clothing, antibiotics and vitamins for children evacu-ated from Chornobyl to Lviv in Western Ukraine; two lorries
Aid and hope from the Ukrainian community to those in need
in 1996, again for families living around Chornobyl, together with medicines and equipment for local health centres.
The Association has also provided humanitarian aid to Ukrainians in need in Romania and Bosnia and tovictimsoffloodinginWesternUkraine, as well as supporting UK charities who work in Ukraine to provide medical care for children with disabilities and those suffering from cancer.
As the situation in Ukraine has changed, the AUW’s charitable work hasfocusedonprovidingfinancialassistance for voluntary organisa-tions in Ukraine who work with disadvantaged children and vulner-able elderly people; on sending aid and Christmas gifts to children in orphanages and centres for disabled children; and, most recently, aid and support to children and families who have lost a parent and been affected
by the war in Eastern Ukraine. Since 2009, the Association also operates a Stipendiary Fund which provides grants each year to prom-ising students who would otherwise notbeabletofinancetheirstudies.
Altogether, in today’s values, the Ukrainian community has collected over £400,000 and, with donated goods, humanitarian aid worth over £500,000 has been sent to Chornobyl victims and others in need.
donations are always welcome and can be sent to:
Ukrainian Children’s Appeal Fund 10 Highbury Road SuttonColdfieldWest Midlands B74 4TF
Bank Transfer toUkrainian Children’s Appeal FundHSBCSort code: 40-07-13Account no. 11298569
oRGANiSERS ANd ASSoCiATES
MEdiA pARTNERS
Published by the Association of Ukrainians in Great Brtain Ltd., 49 Linden Gardens, London W2 4HG.
Chornobyl 30
Printed by Mortons Media Centre, Morton Way, Horncastle LN9 6JR UK