Benton

Clackama-s

Clatsop

Columbia

Coos

Crook

Curry

Deschutes

Douglas

Gilliam Harney Hood River

Jackson

Jefferson

Josephine

Klamath

Lake

Lane

Linroln

Linn

Marion

Multnomah

Polk

Tillamook

Umatilla

Wasco

Washington

VamhiH

jblank)

Grand Total

OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION

Marijuana License Applications

As of 8:00 AM November 27, 2017

Marijuana License Application Statistics as of November 27, 2017 These oombern reflect the number of sulxnitted recreat iomil marij uana license applications as of 8 :00 AM.

Applications are organized by county of the p roposed premises and include anv applications with in a municipality within that county.

i§§if ldl@iij.i,ji Grand Total

1 6 35 3 43 235

2 15

3 34

5 30

1 2 18

2 23 59

1 5 - 1 2

1 5 30

3 47 329

21 273

3 2

3 49 230

1 6 18 1 18

1 19 41

8 101 131 1 3 62

14 1

6 13 7 21 121

8 60

2 3 31 377 1786

6

21 8

22

1

14 30

11

1

6

49

5

11

2

2 97

27

17

59 214

11

10 4

5

38

15 2

730

2 1

15 2 1

3

15 1

1 25

10

31

2 12

74 1

2 15 7

220

1

1

2

13

54

327

4-0

46

60

2

34

129 18 1

3

43

454

5

315

5

4 410

52 38

132 528 78 24

5

26

203

90

7

3146

Lane County - Recreational Marijuana Use Table

~ F-1 F-2 EFU RC (3) RI GI (6) LI (6)

{LC 16.210) {LC 16.211) (LC16.212) (LC 16.291) (LC 16.292) {LC16.280) (LC 16.280)

OLCC LICENSE/

USE . ' CERTIFICATE

TYPE ner 1, indoor only: SUP SUP subject to size

Producer Ma~ijuana Allowed outright as a farm Allowed outright as a farm Allowed outright as a farm

required, subject to limitations In 16.292(3)(u), 1. (grower)

Production use. (1) use. (1) use. (1) 16.291(4). except as except as permitted Permitted. (1), (6) Permitted. (1), (6)

License (1) permitted outright by outright by 16.292(2)(b). ·...: .....__ 16.291(2)(b). (1), (3) (1)

"- SUP required for use, only

SUP required for use and in conjunction with a farm SUP subject to size

Processor Marijuana

must be located on a use. Must be in

SUP required, subject to limitations in 16.292(3)(u),

2. License. (2)

Processing. Prohibited. property that has a

conformance with State 16.291(4). [2), (3)

except as permitted Permitted. (2), [6) Permitted. (2), (6) [2)

dwelling. (2) Law limitations for facilities outright by 16.292(2)(b). for processing farm crops. (2)

(2), (4)

Marijuana Allowed out right, In Allowed outright, in Allowed outright, ln SUP subject to size

3. Wholesaler

Wholesale conjunction with a farm conjunction with a farm conjunction with a farm

Prohibited. limitations in 16.292(3)(u), SUP required, subject to

SUP required. (6) license

Distribution use, as defined in the use, as defined In the use, as defined in the except as permitted special provisions. (6) definition of farm use. definition of farm use. definition of farm use. outright by 16.292(2)(b).

SUP required, subject to Permitted as a small scale Permitted as a small scale personal and professional personal and professional

4. Retail Marijuana

Prohibited. Prohibited. Prohibited. 16.291[4), except as

Prohibited. service, as a secondary service, as a secondary use, license Retail Sales permitted outright by

use, limited in size to 2,500 limited in size to 2,500 sq. 16.291(2)(b). (3)

sq. ft. [6) ft. (6)

SUP required, subject to SUP subject to size

Marijuana limitations in 16.292(3)(u), s. Laboratory

Laboratory Prohibited. Prohibited. Prohibited. 16.291(4), except as

except as permitted Prohibited. Prohibited. license (S) permitted outright by

Operations 16.291(2)(b). (3), (5)

outright by 16.292(2)(b). (S)

SUP subject to size

6. Research Marijuana Allowed in conjunction Allowed in conjunction Allowed in conjunction

Prohibited. limit ations in 16.292(3)(u),

Prohibited. Prohibited. certificate Research with a farm use. with a farm use. with a farm use. except as permitted

outright by 16.292(2)(b).

ALL USES SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LANE CODE (LC) 16.420.

(1) Marijuana Production is subject to setback provisions of LC 16.420(4)(a).

(2) Marijuana Processing is only allowed on properties located within a Fire Protection District, in any zone. (LC 16.420(4)(e)).

(3) RC (Rural Commercial) zone limits size of uses (8,000, 4,000, or 3,500 sq. ft.). See 16.291(4)(a).

(4) See ORS 21S.213(1)(u). Limited to 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area, and the farm that the facility is located on must provide at least one-quarter of the farm crop processed.

(S) Marijuana laboratory uses must be conducted entirely indoors, in conformance with LC 16.420(4)(f).

(6) Uses in the GI and LI zone are subject to the limitations and provisions of LC 16.280.

12/29/15

11/27/2017 Gmail - Olga Martin thanked you for your reply

M Gmail Steve Watkins <watkinsts217@gmail.com>

Olga Martin thanked you for your reply 1 message

Nextdoor Santa Clara I Spring Creek <reply@rs.email.nextdoor.com> To: watkinsts217@gmail.com

Olga Martin from Santa Clara thanked you for your reply:

"Good afternoon, Mr. Farr , I was another of the 25 participants that attended

11/21/17 meeting. Thank you for your transparency in making sure that all

constituents are involved by sending e-mails and updates.

You mentioned "Urban Transition Zones", and that you are aware as a Lane

County resident that the only urban area designated high rent is Eugene. I am

perplexed as you stated as the meeting began the only matters for discussion

was "Homeless Car Camping" now you seem to be saying something totally

different and are referring to Oregon Land Use Commission. You state that this

is a pilot program, is there a reason or justification for any of these programs?

Does Eugene have any temporary or pilot programs as you have mentioned

regarding itinerant issues? You state that the "pilot" program is based roughly

on Eugene, how is that relevant to any other place such as the high rent

Veneta. Is there any reason why it should not be adopted in cities such as the

high rent urban area of Cushman, or Walterville, as they are part of Lane

County. I would appreciate your informed opinion and that of J Bosevich.

Without any previous justification of Eugene Itinerant issues I can only believe

there are none. There are presently camp sites available throughout Lane

County and Eugene"s urban growth boundary that accept automobiles. None

of these areas are designated as a High Rent Urban Areas such as Eugene.

The urban growth boundary is a jurisdictional issue involving the City of

Eugene and there can be no comment regarding any investigation or audit as

it may or may not exist. Church and religious organizations presently have 501

c (3) status and can engage individuals anyway they so desire under authority

granted by the 1st Amendment. There is no reason for government to

"monitor" any protected activity. Would respectfully request you and J. Bosevich provide your reasons for anyone to oversee any 501 c (3) with

regards to separation of church and state.

Lane County urban growth zones have no justification or reason for any

actions that are neither temporary or permanent. If the Commissioners desired

or felt the need to change existing rules, Lane County and the Fair Housing

Council of Oregon would be responsible for initiating in the courts a complaint

with HUD on behalf of the community. It is the responsibility of staff to address

unfair and discriminatory practices. Has the Urban growth boundary, although

not a city, or high rent been submitted as a High Rent Urban Areas as

Eugene.to justify rest stops/Homeless camping? remembering this is not

Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 8:38 PM

https://mail .google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=687 a 7f105d&jsver=CS87NgUoRx4.en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th= 15ff178737 de04b2&siml=15ff178737 de04b2 1 /2

11/27/2017 Gmail - Olga Martin thanked you for your reply

Eugene, Has there been any complaints submitted to the courts or HUD by

any agency?

I believe your proposal is troubling, ill advised and problematic and does not

abrogate rights that I have, or that anyone has in commencing a law suit

against the Lender of the property or the Property Owner either jointly or

severally to bring properties into compliance with Oregon Land Use and

Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). This proposal does not bar

anyone from filing a request for investigation, audit and request for entry into a

Compliance Agreement for a period of 5 years.

Correct me if I am mistaken but I know of no basis for itinerants to be lodged

within any free Commune. If the Commissioners are unable to articulate a

reason for this discriminatory practice these communes should be removed

within 60 days. If not already in compliance, I request that the Commissioners

submit any and all DOJ filings and requirements regulations to provide for the

safety of constituents by reinstating drug intervention practices or drug task

force county wide through DOJ.

Commissioner Farr addressed the matter of Saint Vincent DePaul a 501 c(3)

receiving an as yet an undetermined amount. These services are not within

the terms of the Notice of Determination which is an IRS matter. Mr. Farr in

stating that he has a relative within the mental health field knows or should

have known that: (1) Saint Vincent DePaul, cahoots or others cannot

determine matters having to do with delivery of mental health systems without

considering mental health needs. The case known as Coleman vs. Brown, was

brought and affirmed by the Court in 2014 and remains ongoing, issues

addressed are: (1) screening (2) accurate and complete record keeping (3)

medication distribution (4) treatment programs (5) suicide prevention (6)

depriving offenders of involuntary medication. These areas of service are not

within the realm of a 501 c (3), such as Saint Vincent DePaul. Saint Vincent

DePaul would benefit in reevaluating any proposals submitted and seek legal

advice. Consideration of groups such as cahoots are unacceptable and

present an undetermined risk to itinerants/offenders due to the unresolved

issues regarding the group's services, or actions in the December 2011 Heroin

overdose and the murder of Rick Allen Youngblood (EPD case 11-22151 )."

Vievv or reply Private message

This message is intended for watkinsts217@gmail.com. Unsubscribe or adjust your email settings

Nextdoor, 875 Stevenson Street, Suite 700, San Francisco, CA 94103

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=687 a 7f105d&jsver=CS87NgUoRx4.en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15ff 178737 de04b2&siml=15ff 178737 de04b2 2/2