37
Stochasticity in Signaling Pathways and Gene Regulation: The NFκB Example and the Principle of Stochastic Robustness Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

  • Upload
    trent

  • View
    39

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Stochasticity in Signaling Pathways and Gene Regulation: The NF κ B Example and the Principle of Stochastic Robustness. Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. Rice University Pawel Paszek Roberto Bertolusso UTMB – Galveston Allan Brasier Bing Tian Politechnika Slaska - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Stochasticity in Signaling Pathways and Gene Regulation:

The NFκB Example and the Principle of Stochastic Robustness

Marek Kimmel

Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Page 2: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Credits

• Rice University– Pawel Paszek– Roberto Bertolusso

• UTMB – Galveston– Allan Brasier– Bing Tian

• Politechnika Slaska– Jaroslaw Smieja– Krzysztof Fujarewicz

• Baylor College of Medicine– Michael Mancini– Adam Szafran– Elizabeth Jones

• IPPT – Warsaw– Tomasz Lipniacki– Beata Hat

Page 3: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Gene regulation

Page 4: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

TNF

TNF Signaling PathwayTNF Signaling Pathway

Apoptosis Signal

NF-B AP-1

Inflammation Proliferation

Page 5: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Nuclear Factor-B (NF-B)

• Inducible (cytoplasmic) transcription factor• Mediator of acute phase phase reactant

transcription (angiotensinogen, SAA)• Mediator of cytokine and chemokine

expression in pulmonary cytokine cascade• Plays role in anti-apoptosis and confering

chemotherapy resistance in drug resistant cancers

Page 6: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

IB

Rel A:NF-B1

nucleus

TNF

TRAF2/TRADD/RIP

TAK/TAB1

IKK

Nuclear factor-Nuclear factor-B (NF-B (NF-B) PathwayB) Pathway

Page 7: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Rel A:NF-B1

nucleus

2

Activated IKK

NF-B “Activation”

Page 8: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

IKK

nucleus

TNFR1

Rel A:NF-B1

A20

Negative autoregulation of the NF-B pathway

Rel A

IB

IBC-Rel

NF-B1

NF-B2

RelB

Rel ATRAF1

TNF mRNA

TTP/Zf36

Page 9: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Intrinsic sources of stochasticity

• In bacteria, single-cell level stochasticity is quite well-recognized, since the number of mRNA or even protein of given type, per cell, might be small (1 gene, several mRNA, protein ~10)

• Eukaryotic cells are much larger (1-2 genes, mRNA ~100, protein ~100,000), so the source of stochasticity is mainly the regulation of gene activity.

Page 10: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Simplified schematic of gene expression

• Regulatory proteins change gene status.

Page 11: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

1)(,0)(

,,

AI

IAAI

GG

genectivegenenactive dc

rK

HG

proteinmRNA

mRNA 1

Discrete Stochastic Model

Time-continuous Markov chain with state space

and transition intensities

ProteinRNAGene}1,0{ ZZ

Page 12: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

)()()(

)()(

trytKxdt

tdy

txHGdt

tdx

Continuous Approximationonly gene on/off discrete stochastic

Page 13: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Page 14: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

0 2 4 60

2

4

6x 10

4 Free nuclear NF-kB

0 2 4 60

0.5

1

1.5Activity of IkBa gene

0 2 4 60

100

200

300IkBa mRNA transcript

0 2 4 60

5

10x 10

4 Total IkBa

0 2 4 60

2

4

6x 10

4

0 2 4 60

0.5

1

1.5

0 2 4 60

100

200

300

0 2 4 60

5

10x 10

4

0 2 4 60

2

4

6x 10

4

0 2 4 60

0.5

1

1.5

0 2 4 60

100

200

300

0 2 4 60

5

10

15x 10

4

0 2 4 60

2

4

6x 10

4

0 2 4 60

0.5

1

1.5

0 2 4 60

100

200

300

0 2 4 60

5

10x 10

4

Four single cell simulations

Page 15: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Trajectories projected on (IB,NF-Bn,,time) space, red: 3 single cells, blue: cell population

Any single cell trajectory differs from the “averaged” trajectory

Page 16: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Page 17: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Page 18: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Page 19: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

White et al. experiments

Page 20: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

What happens if the number of active receptors is small?

Page 21: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Low dose responses

Page 22: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Page 23: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

How to find out if on/off transcrition stochasticity plays a role?

• If on/off rapid enough, its influence on the system is damped

• Recent photobleaching experiments →

TF turnover ~10 sec

• However, does this quick turnover reflect duration of transcription “bursts”?

Page 24: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

FRAP (Mancini Lab)Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

Page 25: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

f

N

B

AR

E

The Model

Nkfkt

N

Bkfkt

B

fkkNkBkfDt

f

dNN

dBB

NBdNdB

)(

zyx

kB

kdB

kdN

kN

Page 26: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

The Model

• Fit the model to photobleaching data

• Obtain estimates of binding constants of the factor

• Invert binding constants to obtain mean residence times

• Effect: ~10 seconds

Page 27: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Estimation of mean times of transcription active/ inactive

Page 28: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Estimation of mean times of transcription active/ inactive

Transcription of the gene occurs in bursts, which are asynchronous in different cells.

Page 29: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Estimation of mean times of transcription active/ inactive

hrTE

hrTE

AI

IA

I

A

2.2)(

8.0)(

,

,

1

1

Parameters estimated by fitting the distribution of the level of nuclear message, apparently contradict photobleaching experiments.

Page 30: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

A single gene (one copy) using K-E approximation

)()()(

tGtydt

tdy

Amount of protein:

Where:• and are the constitutive activation and deactivation

rates, respectively,• is an inducible activation rate due to the action of protein dimers.

,1)(,0)(

,, 02

20

AI

IAAI

GG

dycc

oc od

2c

Page 31: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Deterministic description

The system has one or two stable equilibrium points depending on the parameters.

,][

),()()(

02

20

220

dycc

yccGE

GEtydt

tdy

Page 32: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Transient probability density functions

Stable deterministic solutions are at 0.07 and 0.63

Page 33: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Transient probability density functions

Stable deterministic solutions are at 0.07 and 0.63

Page 34: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Transient probability density functions

Stable deterministic solutions are at 0.07 and 0.63

Page 35: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Transient probability density functions

Stable deterministic solutions are at 0.07 and 0.63

Page 36: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

Conclusions from modeling

• Stochastic event of gene activation results in a burst of mRNA molecules, each serving as a template for numerous protein molecules.

• No single cell behaves like an average cell.• Decreasing magnitude of the signal below a threshold

value lowers the probability of response but not its amplitude.

• “Stochastic robustness” allows individual cells to respond differently to the same stimulus, but makes responses well-defined (proliferation vs. apoptopsis).

Page 37: Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

References

• Lipniacki T, Paszek P, Brasier AR, Luxon BA, Kimmel M. Stochastic regulation in early immune response. Biophys J. 2006 Feb 1;90(3):725-42.

• Paszek P, Lipniacki T, Brasier AR, Tian B, Nowak DE, Kimmel M. Stochastic effects of multiple regulators on expression profiles in eukaryotes. J Theor Biol. 2005 Apr 7;233(3):423-33.

• Lipniacki T, Paszek P, Brasier AR, Luxon B, Kimmel M. Mathematical model of NF-kappaB regulatory module. J Theor Biol. 2004 May 21;228(2):195-215.