Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
March 9, 2016
ADDENDUM NO. 2
Solicitation HH-89
Design/Build for Rehabilitation of Skewbacks, Viaduct Piers and Lower Level North Abutment at the Henry Hudson Bridge
To all Prospective Proposers:
The due date to submit Expressions of Interest remains unchanged: March 29, 2016
Attached is the following additional or clarified information for the Project:
1. The presentation from the March 4, 2016 Pre-EOI Informational Meeting is attached. This presentation is being shared for general information and reference only.
2. A copy of the March 4, 2016 Pre-EOI Informational Meeting sign-in sheet is attached.
3. Closing date for Questions is revised to 3/11/16. Please submit your questions in writing to the Point of Contact by 3/11/16 so there is ample time for a complete response.
Below are questions received and the Authority responses:
Q 5 Can the designated Construction Inspection Firm also provide the services of the Material Testing Firm provided that it has the required credentials?
A 5 Yes
Q 6 Will there be an Alternative Technical Concept (ATC) process in the RFP stage?
A 6 Will be answered in a future addendum.
Q 7 Is it acceptable for a contractor to self-perform the geo technical construction provided that it can demonstrate the requisite experience and resources to perform the work?
A 7 Yes.
Q 8 Does the Geotechnical Subcontractor as identified in the EOI have to be exclusive to a particular team?
A 8 No.
Solicitation HH-89 Addendum #2 March 9, 2016
Form CU-078 Page 2 (Rev. 1/4/99)
Q 9 The scope of work for the Geotechnical Subcontractor is undefined at this point
in the process. Can the Contractor name alternate Geotechnical Subcontractors in order to retain a competitive field of bidders?
A 9 Yes.
Q 10 Would the TBTA consider removing the naming of the Geotechnical Subcontractor until the RFP process when the scope of work is more clearly defined?
A 10 No.
Q 11 Please confirm if subcontractors, sub designers or sub consultants of the Design Professional and the Construction Inspection Professional Engineering Firm are required to submit Standard Forms RFQ-4 (rev 8.22.12) and SF-330.
A 11 Confirmed except as noted below in A16
Q 12 Is there a limit to the number of Design-Build firms that will be shortlisted from the evaluation of these Expressions Of Interest? If so, how many?
A 12 No.
Q 13 May the documents that do not count towards the 60 page total, the RFQ-4 Form and Financial Statements, be submitted on a disk only or shall they be printed out as well?
A 13 All submittals must be made as hard copies as well as in electronic format.
Q 14 Can the firm performing the Construction Inspection /QC services also provide the Structural Health Monitoring System?
A 14 No.
Q 15 Can the letter from surety not be included in the page count as they can be multiple pages and vary in page length due to the surety attachments?
A 15 The only exclusions from the 60-page limitation are the RFQ-4 forms and financial statements.
Q 16 It was stated at the 3/4 pre-EOI meeting that any sub consultants to the Design Professional or Construction Inspection Professional Engineering Firm that are included in the EOI would need to submit the appropriate forms as well (RFQ-4 and SF330). Would the SF330 be an individual SF330 for each subconsultant(s) or would a combined SF330 for the Professional firm and its sub(s) be acceptable?
A 16 A combined SF-330 is acceptable as long as the company affiliations are clearly noted.
Solicitation HH-89 Addendum #2 March 9, 2016
Form CU-078 Page 3 (Rev. 1/4/99)
Q 17 The last paragraph on REOI page 2 of 5 states that no more than five (5) past
project descriptions should be provided for the Designer. Is this limitation for the customized SOQ (Item 3.b.ii)? Is the Designer also able to cite the 10 project examples as per the requirements of the SF330 Part I Section F?
A 17 Please refer to the instruction under Part I Section F which states: “Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified…”.
Q 18 If subconsultant(s) are being included, are their project examples part of the Professional firm’s limitations or can they submit five (5) as well.
A 18 Additional sub firms may list their own most relevant project examples. Please remain within the stated page limitations.
Please be governed accordingly in submitting your Expressions of Interest for this solicitation. Additionally, please acknowledge receipt of this Addendum 2 in your Expression of Interest cover letter.
Sincerely, Susan Higgins Director, Procurement
DESIGN-BUILD
CONTRACT
HH-89 / DB
REHABILITATION OF SKEWBACKS, APPROACH
CONCRETE PIERS, AND LOWER LEVEL NORTH
ABUTMENT AT THE HENRY HUDSON BRIDGE
TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY
REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (EOI)
INFORMATIONAL SUMMARY
MARCH 2016
SUSAN HIGGINS, Director
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
Law & Procurement Department
Two Broadway, 24 th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Alternate Point of Contact is John Weldon – email: [email protected]
Designated Point of Contact for al l questions and comments during the procurement phase of the
project as stated in the Request for Expressions of Interest and in accordance with the New York
State Finance Law §§139-j and 139-k.
DESIGNATED POINT OF CONTACT
2
Project Overview
General Location
Project Schedule
Goals
General Scope of Work
Utilities
HH-89 DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT
3
HENRY HUDSON BRIDGE - GENERAL LOCATION
BRONXMANHATTAN
PROJECT HH-89
- Rehabilitation of Skewbacks (4)
- Replacement of Bent Pedestals Piers (16)
- Replacement of LL North Abutment Pilasters (2)
4
Notice of Award is anticipated for
December 2016
Contract Duration
Not to exceed 33 Months
Coordination with other projects
HH-13A / HH-88B – Reconstruction of Toll Plazas and Southbound Approach, and
Replacement of Facility Lighting System
Construction 11/2016 thru 5/2020
HH-07A / HH-30 – Miscellaneous Structural Rehabilitation and Overcoat Painting
at Henry Hudson Bridge
Construction 6/2019 thru 12/2021
PROJECT SCHEDULE
5
Meet project requirements:
Safety
Quality
Schedule
Budget
Provide Alternate Load Path system for arch and tower column loads
Replace concrete bent pedestals and Lower Level North Abutment
Mitigate concrete expansion and cracking due to Alkali -Silica
Reaction (ASR)
Reduce moisture and water infiltration into concrete substructures
PROJECT GOALS
6
HH-89 - Rehabilitation of Skewbacks, Approach Concrete Piers and
North Abutment
Rehabilitation of (4) concrete skewbacks
Replacement of (16) bent pedestal piers
Replacement of (2) concrete abutment pilasters.
GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK
7
Alternate Load Path system
Design, fabricate, and install structural
system to allow transfer of superstructure
loads directly to bedrock
Reinforced concrete encasement
Demolition of 7” of concrete from all
vertical faces and 1’ of top slab excluding
tower column footings
Drill and grout dowels into existing
concrete
Install new 1’-2’ thick concrete encasement
Apply waterproofing/sealant on all surfaces
SKEWBACK REHABILITATION
8
SKEWBACK REHABILITATION
One concept for Alternate Load Path System The Authority is open to and encourages other methods
9
Full replacement of all bent pedestals down to
bedrock
Replacement of pin bearings at Bent 9 and 10 to
fixed connections.
Perform temporary support
BENT PEDESTAL REPLACEMENT
10
Full replacement of Lower Level North Abutment pilasters
Replacement of seismic isolation bearings
Perform temporary support
NORTH ABUTMENT PILASTER REPLACEMENT
11
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM
Design, install, and operate a structural health monitoring (SHM)
system including sensors for: Strain measurement
Displacement measurement
Vibration measurement
Load cell measurement
Tilt monitoring
Weather Station
System shall monitor the performance of the new construction and
existing bridge elements.
System shall be web-based and modular to allow for future
expansion.
Design-Build Team will be required to maintain and operate a SHM
System for up to 2 years following substantial completion of
Construction.
Monitoring reports shall be provided
12
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
Environmental Permitting
Construction Access
Noise Monitoring and Mitigation
MPT for Local Roads
Allowable Work Days and Hours: Bronx Weekdays Only: 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM
No Nights or Weekends
Manhattan All Days: 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM
13
POTENTIAL INTERFERENCE
NORTH VIADUCT
SOUTH VIADUCT
PIER 18W
(LOOKING WEST)
ADJACENT TO EDSALL AVE
PIER 9W
(LOOKING SOUTH)
ADJACENT TO PARK PATH
PIER 20E
(LOOKING WEST)
ADJACENT TO OVERHEAD
POWER LINES
PIER 11W
(LOOKING NORTHWEST)
ADJACENT TO PARK PATH
14
PROJECT WORK AREAS (NORTH – BRONX)
15
PROJECT WORK AREAS (SOUTH – MANHATTAN)
16
SITE ACCESS
MANHATTAN – INWOOD HILL PATH ACCESS
17
SITE ACCESS
BRONX – SPUYTEN DUYVIL PARK PATH ACCESS
18
Relocate existing utilities that are interfering with
work
Ensure coordination with utility owner:
Consolidated Edison
Known existing utilities will be reflected in the RFP
Documents
UTILITIES COORDINATION
19
Design-Build Team shall identify the following:
Construction Contractor
Geotechnical Subcontractor
Design Professional
Construction Inspection Professional Engineering Firm
Design-Build Team shall be fully experienced in all project aspects
including:
Fixed steel bridge analysis
Rehabilitation and replacement of concrete foundations
High capacity deep foundation design and construction
Agency coordination and permitting
EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (EOI)
20
QC/QA is Design-Build Team’s Responsibility
Design-Build Team shall appoint a QC/QA Manager responsible for
Project QC/QA
Construction Inspection shall be by an Independent Engineering Firm
(Retained by the Design-Build Team)
Materials Testing shall be by an Independent Testing Firm or
Laboratory (Retained by the Design-Build Team)
The Authority will perform audit and review QA on Design-Build
Team’s Design and Construction Activities. Additionally, the Authority
will perform in-depth QA inspections of any possible environmental
work.
QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE
(QC/QA)
21
Activity Due Date
Request for EOIs Released 02/01/2016
Final Date for receipt of Proposer’s questions 03/11/2016
EOI Due Date 03/29/2016
Shortlisted DB Teams Announced April, 2016
RFP Issued May, 2016
Proposals Due August, 2016
Contract Award December, 2016
ANTICIPATED PROCUREMENT SCHEDULE
22
Design-Build Contract amount shall include all construction
and engineering services as required by the RFP
RFP will include a Price Schedule
Two-Step Design-Build Procurement Process
Project Schedule Total Duration Not to Exceed 33 Months
Milestones, potential incentives, and liquidated damage assessments will be
detailed in the RFP
Stipend Amount and Agreement will be provided in the RFP
M/WBE Goals have been set at 15% / 15% respectively
CONTRACT INFORMATION
23
Evaluation Factors
Organization and Key Personnel
Past Performance of the proposed Team/Firms
Record of performing together as a Team and on Design-Build Projects
EOI EVALUATION AND SELECTION
24
Solicitation No: HH-89
Attn: Victoria Warren, Manager, Procurement Administration
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority
2 Broadway – Mail Center
Procurement Department
New York, NY 10004
For additional information and required forms,
Visit: http://web.mta.info/bandt/procure/conrfp.html
SUBMIT EXPRESSION OF INTEREST TO:
25
Submittal requirements – page limits Cover letter
Statement of Qualifications
HH-89 Form A
RFQ-4, SF-330
Financial statements
Letter from Surety
Any additional project information will be posted to the Authority website where you obtained this REOI http://web.mta.info/bandt/procure/conrfp.html
Final date for receipt of questions pertaining to this EOI is March 11, 2016 – Email questions to Designated Point of Contact [email protected]
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
26
SUSAN HIGGINS, Director
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
Law & Procurement Department
Two Broadway, 24 th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Alternate Point of Contact is John Weldon – email: [email protected]
Designated Point of Contact for al l questions and comments during the procurement phase of the
project as stated in the Request for Expressions of Interest and in accordance with the New York
State Finance Law §§139-j and 139-k.
DESIGNATED POINT OF CONTACT
27
February 18, 2016
ADDENDUM NO. 1
Solicitation HH-89
Design/Build for Rehabilitation of Skewbacks, Viaduct Piers and Lower Level North Abutment at the Henry Hudson Bridge
To all Prospective Proposers:
The due date to submit Expressions of Interest remains unchanged: March 29, 2016
You are hereby notified of the following change to the above referenced solicitation:
1. The date for the Pre-EOI Informational Meeting is changed to March 4, 2016 (meet at 10:00AM, at the Robert Moses Building on Randall’s Island, NY)
Below are questions received and the Authority responses:
Q1 Reference Solicitation Section 3, Par. b – Please confirm the statement “60 pages of text both sides” is equivalent to 60 sheets of paper with double sided text.
A1 Confirmed
Q2 Reference Solicitation Section 3, Par. b – Please confirm that only the RFQ-4 form and the Financial statements are excluded from the page count and the SF-330 forms are included,
A2 Confirmed
Q3 Reference Solicitation Section 2, Par. e – Please confirm that the proposed Independent Construction Inspection Professional Engineering Firm and Materials Testing Firm or Laboratory is not required to be exclusive to any one Design-Build proposer.
A3 Confirmed
Q4 What is the definition of the Geotechnical Subcontractor a. Is it the firm which designs / engineers the foundation? b. Is it the firm which performs the actual foundation / anchor work?
A4 “Geotechnical Subcontractor” is referring to the firm performing the actual foundation / anchor work.
Solicitation HH-89 Addendum #1
February 18, 2016
Form CU-078 Page 2 (Rev. 1/4/99)
Please be governed accordingly in submitting your Expressions of Interest for this solicitation and be sure to register to attend the Informational Meeting as instructed in the solicitation letter.
Additionally, please acknowledge receipt of this Addendum 1 in your Expression of Interest cover letter.
Sincerely, Susan Higgins Director, Procurement
