March 23 2012 Eua Warwick Adh Habe Track 2 Innovative Campus Management

7/27/2019 March 23 2012 Eua Warwick Adh Habe Track 2 Innovative Campus Management

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/march-23-2012-eua-warwick-adh-habe-track-2-innovative-campus-management 1/12

presentation Alexandra den Heijer & Hans

Beunderman! EUA conference - March 23, 2012

http://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl ! 1

November 2010

Challenge the future DelftUniversityof Technology

EUA University Campus Strategy IntroductionHans Beunderman TU DelftWarwick March 2012

2

Introducing the workshop

•! Workshop outline

•! The Delft University of Technology

•! The Faculty of Architecture / Real Estate & Housing

•! Research on Public RE includes “University RE”

•! TU Delft as a case on University RE strategy

•! Presentation dr. Alexandra den Heijer

Let us share aims and input!

3

Delft University of Technology

founded 1842

TU Delft

4

TU Delft Organisation:

vertical & horizontal

Technology Policy & Mgmt Architecture

Civil Engineering

& Geosciences

Electrical Engineering,Mathematics

and Computer Sciences

Industrial Design

Engineering

Aerospace Engineering

Applied Sciences

Mechanical,Maritime

and Materials

Engineering

Delft ResearchInitiatives

Researchinstitutes

Supervisory Board

Executive Board

Operational Comm. supportboards

2011 TUD Graduate School: an extra horizontal!

5

M ! , as per 2010

•! Academic staff incl 1600PhD •! Support staff •! PhD degrees•! Academic/specialist public.•! Students BSc + MSc

TU Delft Facts & FiguresStaff/output & Finance

•! Funding directly from government•! Indirect and contract funding

Fte, as per 2010

26001900333

6500/75017000

370140

TREND: more students/staff, more networks + cultures

6

The TUD Faculty of Architecture

Departments: Research & Education

•! Architecture•! Urbanism & Landscape Architecture•! Architectural Engineering + Technology•! Real Estate & Housing

Key Facts & Figures FoArchitecture

•! Students 3000 : 2000 BSc, 1000 MSc•! Staff 215 fte Academic, 65 fte Support, 200 PhD (15-20 DR/year)•! Budget /year: 30 mlnE direct funding, ca 5 mlnE indirect

Real Estate & Housing Research

•! Innovations in Management of Built Environment (incl Public RE)

•! Housing Quality

Public RE research includes University/Campus strategies






7

“U-RE” relevance in University strategy: the TU Delft case

•! NL law: Campus RE and ownership/ governance

•! TUD Real Estate Portfolio: its “SWOTs”

•! TUD “Prefered partnerships” strategy: its implications

•! The campus: part of NL-Delta region and

Delft as “Univer-city”

Case example for NL Universities

source: De Hoog / Zandbelt 2010

source: De Hoog / Zandbelt 2010

Activating the “Campus-City” Delft

1 1

3

4

1

1

52

1= housing; 2=BK-City; 3=hotel; 4= Mekelpark hotspots; 5= sports & culture

toTechno

Polis

toDelft

city

related industries

Introducing: dr Alexandra denHeijer

•! In FoA Research & Education

•! Doctorate publication: “Managing the University Campus”

•! Counseling TU Delft Board

•! Advising NL University Association

•! Focal point in European/ world wide “U-RE-web”

Presentation and discussion

Campus of the futuremodels and sustainable choices

Alexandra den Heijer, MSc PhDFaculty of Architecture,

Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Netherlands

EUA annual conference, Warwick March 23, 2012






CONTENT

1.! Vision on managing the university campus (THEORY)

2.! Trends that shape the campus of the future (PRACTICE)

3.! Three future models for university & campus (WORKSHOP)

CONTENT


!"#$%&'$()*+,$-.'/01&+$*2$-34-+2*5-6$$

(7%$*8+&70+/-9$

$

!"#"$%&'$(%)'#*"#%+,#-,#.%/#"01."23%

%!"#$%&'#()*%#+$,(&#*-#()&#./%(#%&-(&-0&#,1#23#4,,56##

:%$0+0;&8%<$!"#$%&'$()*+,$()-$/0:4'2$*2$-34-+2*5-6$$(7%$+-8;-/1+8$*(9$

proposition (PhD defence)

Each university goal

can be frustrated by the physical campus competitiveadvantage

productivity

profitability

sustainabledevelopment

7&/1,/28-0&#0/*(&/*8#$-*9&/%*(3#

%0&-8/*,%:#

#

;<#*-9&%(#*-#0827$%#!#)*=)#087*(8>#0,%(%#!#8(#0,%(#,1#/&%,$/0&%#&'$08?,-#@#/&%&8/0)#

#A<#-&=>&0(#4805>,=#28*-(&-8-0&#!#7/,'$0?9*(3#>,%%#!#>,B&/#7/,.(84*>*(3#!#>,B&/#/8-5#

#

*2780(#,1#0827$%#,-#C.-8-0*8>#%$%(8*-84*>*(3D#






strategic

policy makers

functional

users

controllers

financial

technical

managers

physical

focus on university focus on real estate

s t r a t e g i c

o p e r a t i o n a l

campusdecision

Managingthe university campus

strategic

goals to support,quality ambitions

functioneel

users,satisfaction, mix of functions / spaces

costs, benefits,value

financial

m2, condition.location, quality

physical

campusmanagement

competitiveadvantage

productivity

profitability

sustainabledevelopment

7&/1,/28-0&#0/*(&/*8#$-*9&/%*(3#

E827$%#28-8=&2&-(#*%#84,$(#1,$/#

'*F&/&-(#7&/%7&0?9&%#

Strategic

Policymakers

universitygoals

Functional

space use

Users

Controllers

investment level

costs / m2

Financial

m2 space types

Technical managers

Physical m2

UU-4 RU-1 RUG-3 TUD-3 RUG-2 UU-5 RUG-5 EUR-2

Utrecht/ UU Nijmegen / RU G ro ni ng en / R UG D el ft / T UD G ro ni ng en / R UG U tr ec ht / U U G ro ni ng en / R UG Rotterdam/ EUR

WU-2 TUE-4 UT-1 UT-3 WU-1 EUR-1 TUD-1 TUE-2

Wageningen / WU Eindhoven / TUE Enschede/ UT Enschede/ UT Wageningen / WU Rotterdam/ EUR Delf t / TUD Eindhoven / TUE

RUG-4 LEI-1 UvA-1 TUD-2 UT-2 VU-2 RUG-6 LEI-2

G ro ni ng en / R UG L ei de n / L EI A ms te rd am / U vA D el ft / T UD E ns ch ed e / U T A ms te rd am / V U G ro ni ng en / R UG Leiden / LEI

UU-3 VU-1 UvT-1 UM-2 WU-3 EUR-3 RUG-1 UM-3

U tr ec ht / UU A ms te rd am / VU T il bu rg / U vT M aa st ri ch t / U M W ag en in ge n / W U R ot te rd am / EU R G ro ni ng en / R UG Maastricht/ UM

RU-2 UvA-2 UU-1 TUE-1 UU-2 UM-1 TUE-3 TUD-4

N ij me ge n / R U A ms te rd am / U vA U tr ec ht / U U E in dh ov en / T UE U tr ec ht / U U M aa st ri ch t / U M E in dh ov en / T UE Delft/TUD

source: Den Heijer 2011 – investment costs from 500 to 4000 euro / m2 gross floor area

23

stad stad

campus

campus

stadgebouwen

gebouwen

gebouwen

gebouwen

University campus in 2011

Bron: Managing the university campus (Den Heijer, 2011)

Decreasing public funding

Ageing campus (technically and

functionally)

More than 50 % of floor area is from

1960s and 1970s

Low occupancy and frequency rates

Sustainable campus! “greening the

campus”

Increasing costs of campus

Expanding campus! city

Problems internationally shared






Managing the European campus

country profiles

Strategic

# universitiesranking of universities

future modelsfor higher education

campus ownership

Functional

# users to accommodate-! students-! employees

-! visitors

% GDP budget for higher education

% spent on campus

economic value of presence universities

Financial

m2, condition andlocations

campuses

Physical m2

Example: France

1.! 84 universities2.! more autonomy for universities (LRU, 2007)

3.! Opération Campus: 5 billion euro in 12 campuses

4.! estimated 30% of all university buildings

is in (very) bad condition

5.! goal is to create ‘centres d’excellence’ to compete internationally

6.! financial injection represents only 1% of annual resources

7.! case Paris:

- stimulate collaboration between 8 Paris universities

- invest in student housing: add >12.000 units

- use synergy university-city: ‘univer-city’

8.! extra money for 9 more universities (260 million to share)

CONTENT



Campus of the future:- sustainable solutions-! CO2 neutral campus-! less m2, more quality(photo: Wageningen)

Campus of the future:- intensive and flexible useof high quality facilities

(BK city, Delft)

Campus of the future:- sharing laboratories andother expensive facilities








Campus of the future:student & faculty housing

image: DUWO

photos: DUWO

E,22$-*(3#4$*>'*-=#P/*98(&#!#P$4>*0#%780&#

Campus of the future:- creating the place to meet(photo: Library TU Delft)

E827$%#,1#()&#1$($/&:##

G#2,/&#+$8>*(3O#>&%%#+$8-?(3#

G!-&B#>*1&#1,/#,>'#4$*>'*-=%#G! *-0/&8%&#4&-&.(%#Q#2A#(,#0,9&/#)*=)#28*-(&-8-0&#0,%(#Q#2A#

G#$%&/%#800&7(#2,/&#'&1&0(%#,1#

2&8-*-=1$>O#)*%(,/*0#4$*>'*-=%#

7),(,#R88%(/*0)(#K-*9&/%*(3#






=-.'/*+8$:>6$?'($*:47&5*+8@$$

$ $ $A'0;*(%$&#$4;0/-$B*+(-7*&7$.-2*8+C$

La Chaise&Screen,

Charles&Ray Eames, 1948

Armchair, Ib Kofod-Lar-

sen, ± 1950

, , , , , ,

33

Low Table Set, Frank Gehry,

1972

LTR Table, Charles&Ray

Eames, 1950

, ,

3

, , , ,

Chair, W.H. Gispen, 1929-

1930

Metal Side Table,

Ronan&Erwan Bouroullec,

, , ,

,

, ,

EA108, Charles&Ray Eames,

1958

Folding chair Dafne, Rinaldi

Gastone, 1980

EA124, Charles&Ray Eames,

1958

Elephant Stool, Sori Yanagi,

1954

Armchair, G. Th Rietveld,

1927

Elliptical Table ETR, Charles&Ray Eames, 1951 Gueridon, Jean Prouvé, 1949 Fauteuil, N.K. Roerichl,

1904

EM Table, Jean Prouvé, 1950

F reeform Sofa, Isam u Noguchi, 19 46 Arm chair, H an Pieck, 19 46-19 48 Joyn, Ronan&Erwan B ouroullec, 200244

source: BK city guide – see http://www.bk.tudelft.nl/bkcity - photos & furniture by VITRA - http://www.vitra.com

=-.'/*+8$:>6$?'($*:47&5*+8@$$

$ $ $A'0;*(%$&#$4;0/-$B/';('70;$)-7*(08-C$

=-.'/*+8$:>6$?'($*:47&5*+8@$$

$ $ $A'0;*(%$&#$;*#-$B/0:4'2$D$/*(%C$

proposition (PhD defence)

The campus of the future is a city

FUNCTION MIX – campus of the future

ACADEMIC:EDUCATION &

RESEARCH

RETAIL &LEISURE

RELATEDBUSINESS

RESIDENTIAL

INFRASTRUCTURE






2011: “To share or not to be!”

ORGANISATIONAL LEVELS / potential partners for shared use, management and/or ownership

global continental national regional local university faculty department section individual

world Europe Netherlands region city campus building zone subzone place

PHYSICAL SCALES / resources to accommodate the required campus functions

ACADEMIC FUNCTIONS • EDUCATION & RESEARCH

RESIDENTIAL FUNCTIONS

RETAIL & LEISURE FUNCTIONS

RELATED BUSINESS FUNCTIONS

INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONS m o d e l s f o r s h a r e d u s e / m a n a g e m e n t / o w n e r s h i p

w i t h i n t e r n a l p a r t n e r s o n c a m p u s

m o d e l s f o r s h a r e d u s e / m a n a g e m e n t / o w n e r s h i p

w i t h e x t e r n a l p a r t n e r s o n c a m p u s

"-(&/-8?,-8>#/&1&/&-0&%:#G!S&*'&>4&/=#G!K77%8>8#G!N,/4,--&#Q#P8/*%#G!T>8%=,B#G!T&-(#

K77%8>8O#NB&'&-#

P8/*%O#U/8-0&# S&*'&>4&/=O#T&/28-3#

T>8%=,BO#KV#

CONTENT



3.! Three future models for university & campus (WORKSHOP)

•! traditional, classical university,

academic rituals

•! condition for opportunities:

selection, exclusive, elite

•! same m2

•! same resources,

healthy, safe workplace

•! no facility sharing:

exclusive use for university

•! opportunity for more resources:

- higher tuition & alumni funding

Chapman (2006), edited by Den Heijer (2007/2009/2011)

Model A: “Traditional university”

Campus of the future:model A – traditional university

- exclusiveness, elite & large- can we still afford this?

Campus of the future:model A ‘reinvented’ – University College

small, broad,Bachelor in English, selected talent






•! more institutions thoroughly mixed

with urban fabric continued infusing

in the urban domain with all

campus space types (academic,

housing, leisure etc.)

•! focus on university-industry-

community collaboration

•! same space demand, more facility

sharing

•! sharing resources!more quality

for all stakeholders

CAMPUS IN THE CITY

Harvard Square “university-community collaboration”


Model B: “Network university”

E827$%#,1#()&#1$($/&:#

:&.-;$E$F$+-(G&7,$'+*5-72*(%#

G#!0827$%#*%#28/5&(#7>80&#,1#5-,B>&'=&"#

G!%)8/*-=#()&#0827$%#G!#$-*9&/G0*(3$#

•! the physical campus is an inspiring

meeting place: !creative, stimulating

and a focus on intellectual and social

exchange"

•! virtual !back office", vital very modern

state-of-the art !front office" university

•! m2: less (clicks replace part of the m2)

•! same resources available for less m2

--> higher quality


Model C: “Virtual university”

Campus of the future:model C – virtual university

work where you want

Model ATraditionaluniversity

(= referencemodel)

Model BNetwork

university

Model C Virtual

university

Model A (2)University

college

m2 same m2 much less m2 less m2

users more users more users less users

euros more eurosavailable(from more users)

more eurosavailable(for less m2)

more eurosavailable (higheradded value)

quality per m2 higher quality higher quality higher quality

Managing the university campus ! Managing the European campus






W)8(D%#-&X(Y#

N)8/*-=#5-,B>&'=&#*-#Z$/,7&8-#-&(B,/5#

•! generate collective data & tools to support policy makers

•! many countries have informal or professional organisations

to share management information, for instance:

HIS Akademiska Hus HEFCE / AUDE ‘HOI’

collect and comparestrategic – financial - functional – physical

management information for campus decisions

! NEXT BOOK – “Managing the European campus”

Role European University AssociationEUA

•! putting campus (management) on the strategic agenda

•! gathering data in European network

•! use ‘crowd sourcing’ and ‘crowd funding’ (EU universities)

•! to generate collective management information

•! compare campus management models (campus ownership)

•! result: publications / benchmarks / tools

! supporting campus decisions of EUA members

Follow me on Twitter:@alexandra_dh

More about the book

“Managing the university campus”:

http://managingtheuniversitycampus.nl

64

META CONCLUSIONS

1.! THEORY - managing the campus is complex task - affects all university performance criteria

2.! PRACTICE- trends are international- “to share or not to be”

3.! MODELS

- align university & campus strategy- combining traditional, network & virtual campus

! Share information in European (EUA) network

65

Questions for the audience

Informative1.! Your role in campus management?

[policy maker, responsible for campus management,

researching the campus]

2.! Ownership of your campus? [university or other party]

3.! Campus strategy part of your university strategy?

For debate

4.! Your opinion about the importance of (a) the campus and (b)innovative campus management

What’s next?

5. Role EUA in researching and comparing campus management in

different countries? [would you be interested / participate?]

W)8(D%#-&X(Y#

N)8/*-=#5-,B>&'=&#*-#Z$/,7&8-#-&(B,/5#

•! generate collective data & tools to support policy makers

•! many countries have informal or professional organisations

to share management information, for instance:

HIS Akademiska Hus HEFCE / AUDE ‘HOI’

collect and comparestrategic – financial - functional – physical

management information for campus decisions

! NEXT BOOK – “Managing the European campus”






Role European University AssociationEUA

•! putting campus (management) on the strategic agenda

•! gathering data in European network

•! use ‘crowd sourcing’ and ‘crowd funding’ (EU universities)

•! to generate collective management information

•! compare campus management models (campus ownership)

•! result: publications / benchmarks / tools

! supporting campus decisions of EUA members

source: http://www.university-autonomy.eu/dimensions/financial/

Campus ownership

opportunities and threats

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

-! autonomy to decide-! costs and benefits closely

connected-! more cost-consciousness

-! more support for culture change-! land value: relation with local

parties

-! chance to have a campus portfoliostrategy (manage a ‘city’)

-! backlog maintenance-! much higher capital costs

-! poor technical state can frustrateuniversity goals

-! resources for campus can not beinvested in education and research

-! organization not prepared for new

management tasks-! lack of management information

Documents

March 23 2012 Eua Warwick Adh Habe Track 2 Innovative Campus Management