Upload
stewart-carpenter
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
March 11, 2015
WIOA – Regions and Board Structure
WIOA – UpdatesWIOA – Regional planning and opportunities
WIOA- State board structuresWIOA adoption or request grandfathering of
current council structure
3
WIOA &Workforce Development Areas
Rationale for Designation&
How to Proceed With Planning
High Level WIOA Implementation
Formulation
July, 2014 January, 2015 July, 2015 January, 2016 July, 2016
Planning
Implementation
Assess the law for potential opportunities and challenges for implementationEstablish workgroups to formulate questions and approaches for implementationPreliminary regulations – respond and use to guide planning
Begin to make required decisions in consultation with appropriate partnersDraft Regional Planning Sessions with GWDC and MWCABegin holding Regional Planning Sessions to gather stakeholder inputDraft Regional Plans presentedUnified Planning begins fall of 2015, due 3-16Draft of Local Planning process proposedLocal Plans due May, 2016Unified and Local Plans approved, July 2016
Law begins for program services for Vocational Rehabilitative Services and State Services for the Blind July, 2014Law begins for program services for Youth April, 2015Law begins for program services for Adult, Dislocated Worker, Wagner-Peyser July, 2015Eligible Training Provider List policies for WIOA begins January, 2016All components of WIOA implemented – July, 2016
5
WIOA Rationale for WDA Proposal Intent of WIOA – Section 2. Purpose
Strategic Coordination Results for Job Seekers & EmployersBetter alignment of related systems. Increase access to workforce development services
Improve the structure and delivery of services. Credentialed skills providing sustainable wages and workers.
Activities through a state wide system that produces results.
Prosperity of workers and employers - globally competitive.
Requirements of WIOA – Workforce Development and Local AreasClassifications – sec. 106 1 local area per region; 2 or more local areas per region; multi-state region
Characteristics – sec. 106 Consistent with labor market and Economic Development Areas; have adequate resources available to carry out activities, including education/training providers
Local Areas – sec. 107 Local areas meeting performance and financial auditing standards shall be allowed to maintain their local designation.
Law Requirements
Population & Workforce
Geographical Size
Constraints&
Considerations
Equitable Distribution
Geo-Political BoundariesMan
agea
ble A
ctivit
y
Rationale for WDA Proposal- Commissioner’s Approach -
There is no “perfect approach”, but a balance between considering the law; population and workforce; and geographical size
7
Rationale for WDA Proposal
EDRs 1,2,4,5 alignwith WSAs 1 and 2
EDR 3 alignswith WSAs 3 and 4
EDRs 6w, 8, 9 alignwith WSAs 6 and 7
EDRs 6e, 7w, 7e alignwith WSAs 5 and 17
EDR 11 aligns with WSAs 9,10, 12, 14, 15 and 16
EDR 10 alignswith WSAs 8 and 18
1
3
2
45 6
8
Rationale for Workforce Development Regions
1
3
2
45 6
Summary of Rationale for Workforce Development AreasWIOA Intent Stronger Strategic Alignment across Systems and
within Regions
WIOA Requirements
All Regions are classified as option “2” At least 1 Met.SA per region Local Area designations maintained
Geo-Political Boundaries
Regions contain “whole” EDRs and Local Areas
Working Relationships
Supports existing and new working relationships
A Workforce Development Area …..(Based on WIOA Regional Planning Requirements)
1. Coordinates service strategies that support Workforce and Economic Development.
2. Pursues sector initiatives for in-demand industry and occupations.
3. Seeks to reduce administrative costs through pooling of funds for administrative costs.
4. Aligns transportation and other supportive services.
5. Negotiates performance accountability measures for local areas.
CHAMPIONS A BROADER SYSTEMIC VIEW TO ALIGN AND MAXIMIZE SYSTEM RESOURCES AND OUTCOMES FOR JOB SEEKERS AND EMPLOYERS
10
Next Step - Regional Planning Sessions!
1
3
2
45 6
Planning Session OverviewConveners DEED, GWDC, MWCAInvitees County Commissioners & WIB members
ABE, MnSCU, K-12 EDRs, MIFs, other economic/community
developers DEED and Other partners/providers
Purpose Assess readiness of partnerships to enhance system
Meet consulting requirement of WIOA
Agenda 1. Regions & Rationale2. Regional Planning Requirements3. Key Questions to be Addressed4. Provide overview of data sets (by county)5. Small table Q&A and feedback
11
Proposed Workforce Development Areas
Process for Regional Planning
Regional Alignment
Service Delivery
Data Analysis & Evaluation
RegionalPlan
Local & RegionalPlanning Requirements
State, Regional & LocalGoals
The Regional Plan will focus on inputs from WIOA and identified system issues at the state, regional and local levels within three broad categories:
• Regional Alignment• Service Delivery• Data Analysis & Evaluation
These requirements will be shaped by using state, regional and local goals to address the workforce and economic development needs of individual Workforce Development Areas.
12
Proposed Workforce Development Areas
Process for Regional PlanningWhat does it mean to be a region?
REGIONAL ALIGNMENT
1. How will the region align itself and the resources for managing the vision for preparing a skilled workforce to support regional economic growth and economic self-sufficiency?
• How will the region be organized with respect to oversight of the Regional Plan - including governance, input from system partners and costs for this oversight.
• How will infrastructure costs be defined – both “system” and “WorkForce Centers” - and allocated equitably based on the State Board requirements.
• How will required and optional partners be engaged in planning for regional alignment to enhance services and avoid duplication of services.
• How will economic developers be engaged to enhance services.• How will state level policies be created/modified to support regional alignment.• Identify the intra-regional opportunities.
Proposed Workforce Development Areas
Process for Regional PlanningWhat does it mean to be a region?
STRATEGIES FOR DELIVERY OF SERVICES
2. How will the region add value to job seeker and employer services through new and expanded service delivery strategies?
• How will “career services” and “training services” be provided at WorkForce Centers, through partnerships and online access.
• How will employers be engaged to shape the services that will address there needs, including work-based learning opportunities.
• How will youth, individuals with barriers to employment, veterans and other disparate impact populations be included in service design and activities.
• How will supportive service strategies be enhanced/expanded.• How will WorkForce Centers be designated – “full fledge” and “affiliate”.
Proposed Workforce Development Areas
Process for Regional PlanningWhat does it mean to be a region?
USING DATA TO SUPPORT STRATEGY, PERFORMANCE
AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
3. How will the region utilize data to support strategy development, set performance standards and continuous improvement benchmarks.
• How will labor market information to support planning and creating strategies for Career Pathway design and planning to achieve “sustainable wage” credentials that meet the needs of employers.
• How will performance data be used to support continuous improvement of service and training providers.
• How will local boards use data to measure their effectiveness locally and regionally.• How will technology be leveraged/deployed to impact performance and continuous
improvement.• How will performance accountability measures be negotiated within the region.
15
State Workforce Boards under WIOARecommendations for Minnesota’s
State Board – Governor’s Workforce Development Council (Board)
State Board StructuresSec. 101 Workforce Development Boards
• WIOA requires the Governor to establish a state workforce development board to carry out the functions (subsection d)
• Alternate Entity-if in compliance with sections (a),(b), and (c), a state may use our existing state council (within the meaning of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (H.R. 803-19, (e)(1)
Comparison of GWDC and WIOA
GWDC (Current) WIOA
Governor GovernorChair appointed by Governor Chair appointed by Governor2 members of each state chamber 1 member of each state chamber Chief Elected Officials (city/county) Chief Elected official (city and/or
County)State Agency for One-Stops (DEED) State agency WIA programs (DEED)
Comparison of GWDC and WIOAGWDC (Current) WIOA
6 Private Sector To be determined6 Labor Representatives Labor organization representatives,
nominated by State labor federations; representative from a labor organization or training director from a joint labor-management apprenticeship program
6 Community-based organizations Community based organizations with expertise in employment, training, serving individuals with barriers to employment, disability and youth
Comparison of GWDC and WIOAGWDC (Current) WIOAAdditional State Agencies: MN Department of EducationMN Department of Human Services
Governor “may” designate (voting or ex-officio):Relevant state agencies related to workforce development
EducationSecondary & Post-secondary Vocational InstitutionsEducation –University of Minnesota, MnSCUSchool-based Service LearningLocal Public SecondaryAgriculture Education
Governor “may”:Education: higher education
Requirements under WIOA: Minimum of 17 Voting Members
GovernorLegis-lators:
2Local
Elected Of-ficial
DEED
Private Sector: 9
Labor: 3
Proposed Criteria for Private Sector GWDC Membership
• Industry growth, sustained over 10 years• Industries that demonstrate career pathways
opportunities resulting in increased wages• Concentration of industries within regions
contributing to Minnesota’s GDP• Nuances within sectors• Emerging sectors• Family sustaining wages
WIOA Committee Recommendation• Review of multiple state structures• Discussion with other states proposed WIOA
structures at the NGA winter meeting• Review of WIOA law and priority for
consideration for industry sectors • Minnesota’s demand for a skilled workforce
and identified workforce stakeholders• Consideration for regional economies
Recommended Industry RepresentativesTotal: 15
• Agriculture (Animal and Crop Production) (2)• Construction (2)• Finance & Insurance• Health Care and Social Assistance (2)• Management of Companies & Enterprises• Manufacturing (3)• Mining• Professional & Technical Services (2) • Utilities
Regional Alignment with Industries
Region 1• Agriculture • Manufacturing
Region 5• Agriculture• Manufacturing
Region 2• Manufacturing• Mining
Region 3• Construction• Utilities
Region 6• Health Care • Professional & Technical Svcs.
Region 4• Construction• Finance &
Insurance• Health Care• Management • Professional &
Technical Svcs.
21
5
3 46
Rationale for Industry Representation
• Analysis of labor market information data for each of the 16 Workforce Service Areas
• Analysis of commute patterns, location of WorkForce Centers, and industry sectors/clusters – supply chain
• Projected growth, impact on Minnesota’s economy, and career pathways within industry sectors
Workforce Development Area Representation
• One private sector representative from each of Minnesota’s Workforce Development Area’s (minimum of one)
• One private sector representative from each WDA will also serve on a local Workforce Development Board
• Minnesota Workforce Council Association requests a minimum of 25% of the private sector representatives also serve on a local board
Rationale for Proposed StructureWIOA Law Requirement:
• Not less than 20% represent workforce who-– Include labor organizations and an
apprenticeship program(s)• This represents three members under the
proposed GWDC structure. Two from labor organizations and one member representing apprenticeship programs
Rationale:
• A representative from a CBO and youth serving individuals with barriers: disabilities, communities of color and/or disadvantaged youth. These two representatives are critical service delivery partners and should have a vote on the board.
WIOA Law:• CBOs with demonstrated experience in employment,
training, education to meet the needs of individuals with barriers to employment and organizations with expertise in addressing the employment
Rationale for Education MembersWIOA Law:
Governor “may” designate, the committee recommends three members from post-secondary education; MnSCU, University of Minnesota, and private higher education institutionsThese members are critical to the development and delivery of education and skill development and part of innovative solutions for talent development
RationaleWIOA-Adult Basic Education
• WIOA Title II is a required partner and included in performance outcomes• The ABE system serves roughly 75,000 students statewide each year• Adult education theory, practice and delivery systems are unlike anything within the K-12 system. ABE is administered locally by community education and non-profit organizations.• ABE is a central partner in career pathway development (FastTRAC and other Transitions) involving DEED and MnSCU. • ABE offers a wide variety of employment/job preparation programs. Many of these link to GED, Adult Diploma, and other educational programming, • Work done by ABE, such as development of distance learning and digital literacy training, is increasingly central to workforce development.
Proposed Board Structure : 29 Voting Members
Proposed Board Structure: 29 Voting Members
Governor
2 Legislators
1 Local Elected Official
1 DEED
15 Private Sector
3 Labor
1 CBO
1 Youth
1 ABE
1 MnSCU
1 U of M
1 Private Colleges
GWDC under WIOA
Proposed Ex-officio GWDC Members
• MN Department of Human Services • MN Department of Education• MN Department of Labor and Industry• MN Department of Corrections• MN Office of Budget and Management• Office of Higher Education• MN Workforce Council Association• Libraries • Women’s Economic Security Act
9 Non-voting Members
MWCADepartment of
Human ServicesDepartment of
EducationDepartment of Labor and In-
dustry
Department of Corrections
Office of Higher Education
Minnesota Management &
Budget
Public LibrariesWESA
Total GWDC Membership: 38
Proposed Board Structure: 29 Voting Members
9 Non-voting Members
Governor
2 Legislators
1 Local Elected Official
1 DEED
15 Private Sector
3 Labor
1 CBO
1 Youth
1 ABE
1 MnSCU
1 U of M
1 Private Colleges
9 Non-voting Members