26
Manipulator s Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Element that interacts with other objects ANSWER I

Citation preview

Page 1: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

ManipulatorsMechanicalMVRT10-09-2006

DESIGN II

Page 2: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

What is

a

QUESTIO

N I manipu

lator

?

What is aQUESTION I

manipulator ?

Page 3: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Element that interacts with other objects

ANSWER I

Page 4: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Manipulators work through physical contact

CONCEPT I

Page 5: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

No...• Electromagnetism• Non-friction heating• Antigravity• Other unexplained natural phenomena

CONCEPT I

Page 6: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Why do we avoid non-physical manipulation?

QUESTION II

Page 7: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Simple and dependable is better

ANSWER II

Page 8: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Manipulators should be designed for a specific purpose

CONCEPT II

Page 9: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Purposes:•Changing position of field objects

•Changing position of robot w/ FOs

CONCEPT II

Page 10: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE I

Team 166 holding 4 tetras.

Page 11: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE II

Team 60 holding 2 goals.

Page 12: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE III

Teams 233 and 522 hanging from the bar.

Page 13: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

How well does each manipulator accomplish its purpose?

QUESTION III

Page 14: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Manipulators need to be positioned or position themselves

CONCEPT III

Page 15: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Methods of positioning.•Drivetrain•Powered (mechanized)

CONCEPT III

Page 16: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE IV

Teams 115 balancing with two goals and multiple balls.

Page 17: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE VTeams 114’s self-tracking rotating shooter.

Page 18: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE VITeams 75’s first shooter concept.

Page 19: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

What are the pros and cons of each positioning method?

QUESTION IV

Page 20: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Manipulators need to consistently affect FOs

CONCEPT IV

Page 21: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

Methods of affection•Friction•Vacuum•Physical constraint

CONCEPT IV

Page 22: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE VII

Teams 469’s robot for 2006.

Page 23: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE VIIITeams 1902’s intake rollers.

Page 24: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

PICTURE IX

Teams 1388 capping a tetra.

Page 25: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

What are some uses for each method of affection?

QUESTION V

Page 26: Manipulators Mechanical MVRT 10-09-2006 DESIGN II

ManipulatorsBy Humphrey HuPhotographs from ChiefDelphiYou may not modify this Powerpoint without permission

DESIGN II