Manifestation with Omnibus Motion

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Manifestation with Omnibus Motion in the case of People of the Philippines vs. Andal, et al.

Citation preview

  • REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINESNATIONAL CAPITAL IUDICIAL REGION

    QUEZON CITYREGIONAL TRIAL COURT

    BRANCH 227

    Proptu oF THE PHIUPPINES,

    Plaintiff , i s. \ti:tiitil! riiliiM

    -

    versus -

    D.tru ANnar "LJNsAY"Aurarueu jR., ET AL.,

    Criminal Cases Nos.Q-09-162148 to 72Q-09-162216 to 31Q-10-162652 to 66

    Q-l0-163766GL-Q-12-L78638

    Accused.

    x- -

    - -

    - -

    x

    MANIFESTATION

    -

    with -

    NOTICE ON PRESENTATION OF CHrLD WTTNESS

    -

    and-

    OMNIBUS MOTION:

    rOR CTARIFICATION

    -

    and-

    To ENsunr CoUpLIANCE wrrH THE RULE oNExaprrNa,TIoN or Crurn WIrNEss

    Accused Zl^toy Uy AnapATUAN (hereinafter "Zaldy"), bycounsel, to this Honorable Court, hereby respectfully states:

    IEZON frIl'Y

    ffi[fu**r#fiY: ilLN zlQ -r l

  • 1. On 22 August 2014, Zaldy, by counsel, received acopy of the Manifestation also dated 22 August 2014, filed byArry. Nrlse A. Saxros, counsel for private complainants, whereshe "requires that the defense [counsel] inform the prosecution,both public and private prosecutors, the names of theirwitnesses to be presented and copy furnished [sic] them thedocuments to be identified by the witnesses, if any, at least five(5) days before the scheduled hearing."

    2. Zaldy respectfully submits, with all due respect tothe prosecution, however, that the Manifestation dated 22August 2A14 is procedurally defective because

    -

    a. first, it does not bear the conformity of thepublic prosecutors, who have control and supervisionover the prosecution of the consolidated criminalcases at Bar;

    b. second, considering that the Manifestationdated 22 August 20-1.4 includes, at least implie dly, aprayer for relief

    -in this case, requiring the defenseto provide the prosecution with the names ofwitnesses and the list of documents to be identifiedby the witnesses-Atty. Santos should have filed anappropriate motion to this effect, in compliance withprocedural rules governing motions; and

    c. third, assuming the Manifeststion isprocedurally permissible to effect the granting of therelief aforementioned, it is the court

    -

    not Atty.Santos

    -

    that has the power to direct the defense toprovide the information sought in the Manifestation.

    3. Further, proceduralrespectfully submits that

    -

    infirmities aside, Zaldy

    a. first, the request by the defense for theprosecution to provide information on the evidenceto be presented by the prosecution is grounded onthe constitutionally-guaranteed right of Zaldy, as anaccused in the criminal cases at Bar, to compulsoryprocess, thus:

    No person shall be held to answer tor acriminal offense without due process of law.

    I\i(^-:f^-+^+:^- -^.i]L NT^+:^^

    --I f-r*-:L,.- ilr^+i^- D^ -^ .t

  • In ail criminal prosecutions, the accusedshall be presumed innocent until the contrary isproved, and shall enjoy the right to be heard byhimself and counsel, to be informed of the natureand cause of the accusation against him, to havea speedy, impartial, an':.d public trial, to meet the'witnesses face to face, and to haoe compulsoryprocess to secure the attenilance of zoitnesses anilthe production of eoidence in his behalf .F{owever, a{ter arraignment, trial may proceednotwithstanding the absence of the accused:Provided, that he has been duly notified and hisfailure to appear is unjustifiable. (Emphasissupplied)

    b. second, neither he nor his counsel isbound by representations and waivers made by hisprevious counsel.

    4. Moreover, Zaldy is not aware on whether theprosecution has fully rested its case, consid"ering that, to theknowledge of undersigned counsel, the prosecution hadsubpoenaed additional witnesses who have yet to be cross-examined by the rest of the accused in the criminal cases at Bar,considering that they have yet to secure the services of newcounsel.

    5. On this point, Zaldy respectfully manifests that he,through undersigned counsel, intends to cross-examine thesewitnesses by the prosecution. Nonetheless, he likewiserespectfully manifests that he is waiving his physicalappearance in the proceedings at Bar in the meantime.

    6. Under the circumstances, particularly becausepresentation of evidence by the defense might be premature atthis juncture, Zaldy respectfully seeks clarification from thisHonorable Court on whether he is procedurally permitted topresent evidence on 3 September 2A14, at 9:00 AM, despite thependency of the prosecution's presentation of evidence,including the fact that the accused, including Zaldy, have yet tocross-examine the witnesses of the prosecution.

    that,his

    7 - In any event, however, Zaldy respectfully manifestsif so permitted to present evidence, he will be presentingdaughter, Bal Irlonarov M. Auperuaru (hereinafter

    "Cookie"), d minor, at the hearing scheduled on 3 September

    Manifestation with Notice and Omnibus Motion Paee 3

  • 201,4, at 9:00 AM, andf or at such other date or dates to bescheduled by this Honorable Court.

    8. As a minor, Cookie is covered by the Rule onExamination of Child Witness.

    9. Zaldy, therefore, and to protect the best interests ofthe witness, respectfully moves for this Honorable Court toensure compliance, not only by personnel of this HonorableCourt, but by all parties hereto, including the prosecution, withthe provisions of the RuIe on Exsmination of Child Witness,including Sections 11 (on Support Percons), 12 (an Waiting Areafor ChildWitnesses), and 13 (on Courtroaru Enuironment).

    PRAYER

    Wherefore, in view of all the foregoing considerations,Zaldy respectfully prays that this Honorable Court:

    a. NoTE the manifestations made herein;

    b. cLARTFY theZaldy's presentation of2014, at 9:00 AM;

    procedural propriety ofevidence on 3 September

    c. ENSURE compliance by the parties hereto,and by personnel of this Honorable Court, with theRule on Exsmination of ChildWitness.

    Zaldy likewise prays for other just and equitable reliefs.Respectf ully submitted.

    Pasig City for Quezon City, 29 August 201,4.

    l\fenifcctatinr r^zilhl\Tnfino enr{ f)mnikrrc l\rfnlina It,ca L

  • By,

    PTR

    HEFFRON ESGUERRA DY & DE }ESUSCounsel for Accused Zaldy Uy Ampatuan221"0, 22 / F , Tycoon Centre, Pearl Drive

    Ortigas Center 1605, Pasig CityMetropolitan Manila

    Republic of the PhilippinesTelefax: (63 2) 91.0 4893

    Email: [email protected]

    Jre,, lWIAMES KEITH C.,HEFFRON

    Roll No. 46388IBP Lifetime No. 05500 RSM

    No. No. 2AA9758 / 20 February 201.4 / MandaluyongMCLE Certificate of Com iance No. IV-0422288

    RRA

    '/ 30 januEry 201,4 / RSM/ 4February 2A14 /PasigCity

    Compliance No. IY -AA22223

    RE R. }ESUS

    PTR No. 42361,31 1 9 January 2A14 / Makati CityMCLE Certificate of Compliance No. IV-A020674

    REQUEST FOR HEARTNG

    Crnnx or CounrBranch 221Regional Trial CourtQuezon City, Metropolitan Manila

    Greetings! Kindly include the accompanying OmnibusMotion in the trial calendar of the Honorable Court for 2September 2A\4, at 8:30 AM, during which undersigned counselshall submit the matters contained therein for the considerationand resolution of the Honorable Court.

    P No. 952No. 98598

    Manifestation with Notice and Omnibus Motion Pase 5

  • DE IESU$

    HEARINGNOTICE OF

    Paxsl or PnosECUToRsDepartment of JusticePadre Faura Street, ErmitaManila

    Arrv. NEua A. SaNrosDoor 15, Acepal BuildingKoronadal City, South Cotabatosantoslawoffice@ gmail. com

    Greetings! Kindly take notice that undersigned counsel hasrequested the Branch Clerk of the Honorable Court to includethe accompanying Ornnibus Motion in the trial calendar of theHonorable Court for 2 September 2A1".4, at 8:30 AM, duringwhich undersigned counsel shall submit the matters containedtherein for the consideration and resolution of the HonorableCourt.

    \T^ai^^ ^..l n--.:L--^ lf^!:^.^

  • Capy furnished:

    PaNnr or PRosECUToRsDepartment of |usticePadre Faura Street, ErmitaManila

    Arrv. NrNa A. SaNrosDoor L5, Acepal BuildingKoronadal City, South Cotabatosantoslawoffice@ gmail. com

    Ks*?.oOdt.

    0\?qsg0r-\rgat lac\g l'O&tg J1,,$\Ll

    EXPLANATION AS TO SERVICE ANDFILING OF PLEADING

    (To be disregarded if effected personally)

    Copies hereof intended for the other parties and thisHonorable Court were served and filed, respectively, viaregistered mail, personal service and filing being impracticabledue to lack of material time.