20
Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski [email protected]

Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

Managing Talent

MANA 4328

Dr. Jeanne Michalski

[email protected]

Page 2: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

“Leaders Matter”

Page 3: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

What do we know about how leadership and how leaders develop Corporate Executive Board

“Voice of the Leader”

Center for Creative Leadership McKinsey & Company Research

“War for Talent” “Performance Ethic”

Page 4: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Corporate Executive Board

“Voice of the Leader”

Sponsored by Corporate Executive Board Designed to provide systematic evidence to help

organizations make decisions on effective leadership development approaches

Web-based survey administered to over 15,000 leaders

Over 8000 Executives from 31 organizations in 6 industries responded

Using conjoint analysis, the effectiveness of leadership development activities was evaluated from the eyes of the leaders

Page 5: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

What Drives Effective Leadership?Complete List of Characteristics Evaluated by Respondents

People Leadership Character Leadership Process Leadership Strategic Leadership

Clearly communicateexpectations

Correctly evaluate thepotential in others

Hold peopleaccountable

Inspire others Persuade and

encourage others tomove in a desireddirection

Put the right people inthe right roles at theright time

Recognize and rewardachievement

Strong commitment todiversity

Strong commitment tostaff development

Accept responsibilityfor successes andfailures

Challenge the statusquo

Comfortable withambiguity

Committed to yourcontinuous personaldevelopment

Confident Honesty and integrity Intelligent Negotiate effectively Open to new ideas Original Passion to succeed Perseverance Sensitive to the needs

of others Think analytically Years of experience in

positions ofmanagement

Appropriately handlecrises

Break down a projectinto manageablecomponents

Correctly allocateresources acrosscompeting priorities

Create clear workplans and timetables

Creatively solveproblems

Encourage andmanage innovation

Measure results Properly manage

budgets and timelines Translate a long-term

vision into a step-by-step plan

Adapt to changingcircumstances

Correctly assess therisk and return ofdecisions

Deep understanding ofmarkets, competitorsand customers

Global perspective Identify and articulate

long-term vision forfuture

Properly managerelationships with thirdparties

Understandingstrengths andweaknesses ofcompany

Source: Corporate Executive Board 2001 Leadership Survey.

Page 6: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Corporate Executive Board

Most important attributes of effective leadership

Leaders consider people-leadership skills as the most important attributes of effective leadership, followed by strategic-leadership skills.

Page 7: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Corporate Executive Board

Most important attributes of effective leadership People-leadership skills

Clearly communicating expectations Recognizing and rewarding achievement Inspiring others

Strategic-leadership skills Identifying and articulating a long-term vision Understanding markets, competitors, and customers Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the

company

Page 8: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Corporate Executive Board

What leadership activities do leaders value the most?

Feedback and relationship-based development programs are viewed as more effective than on-the-job experiences, which in turn are viewed more effective than education-based programs.

The amount of decision-making authority given to leaders, however, is the single most important factor in leadership development.

Page 9: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Corporate Executive Board

Feedback and Relationship programs

Creating Leadership development plan Interacting with Peers Meeting with an executive coach Meeting with a mentor Feedback

Page 10: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey & Company

Bottom Line Impact

Evidence suggests that stronger leadership teams can positively affect company economic performance.

Companies that are the best at managing talent deliver far better results for their shareholders, up to 22% better

High performing employees generate: 40% more productivity from Operations performers 49% increase profits from General Management

performers 67% increased revenue from Sales Representatives

Page 11: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey War for Talent Study

“War for Talent”

McKinsey & Company groundbreaking study on Leadership Development

77 companies involved in the study at CEO level and the top 300 in the company

Top 300 people studied extensively 11 different industries represented All 6,500 executives were asked to complete a 45-minute survey on

what they have done in their career, and what drives and keeps them at their current company

Unknown to the 6,500 executives, they were split into three buckets: high potential, good performer, below average

The companies were split into quintiles by financial performance in their respective industries

Page 12: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from Corporate Executive Board

Research Findings

There is a direct link between a company’s ability to provide leaders with the development opportunities they most value and the overall strength of the leadership bench.

Page 13: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey War for Talent Study

Build a talent mindset

A belief that talent impacts business results A belief that “A” players will outperform “B”

players, regardless of the challenge Executives know what an “A” player is, and the

“A” players have been identified Executives are accountable for people

leadership and development The best will be rewarded

Page 14: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey War for Talent Study

Culture that encourages candor and risk taking when discussing people

Executives talk about people frequently in a candid and probing way…they differentiate people on performance and potential

Take risks on people and move them into jobs before they are ready (stretch assignments)

Executives talk candidly about their own and others’ development

Executives are expected to ask for and give insightful feedback

Shared set of values around people development

Page 15: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey War for Talent Study

Build solid leadership development processes

Performance Management Feedback & Coaching Education & Development Recruiting Assessment

Page 16: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey War for Talent Study

“First Break all the Rules”

Gallup Organization’s research 80,000 managers in 400 organizations

Page 17: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

“First Break all the Rules”

What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently… Select the right talent Correctly coach for the right outcomes for direct reports Maximize strengths Place the right person in the right job at the right time Create heroes in every role Reward performance Frequent interaction regarding performance Focus on future and the next level

Page 18: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey Performance Ethic Study

“Performance Ethic” Study

McKinsey & Company - 6,900 managers in 56 organizations

Page 19: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

*Adapted from McKinsey Performance Ethic Study

“Performance Ethic” Study

These are the things high performing companies do consistently: Mission / Inspiration Highly aggressive short- and long-term goals Flat, atomized, accountable organizational units Transparent performance feedback Consequence management Coordination and control Levers Motivation levers

Page 20: Managing Talent MANA 4328 Dr. Jeanne Michalski Michalski@uta.edu

How do leaders develop?

Experience

and

Feedback!