Upload
evelyn-farmer
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Managing Salinity with Markets, Plants and
Engineering(How do we move policy forward?)
David Pannell
This copy of slides has all photos removed to reduce file size
Degree of threat varies
Salt scald
Suitable for salt-tolerant plants
Completely unaffected
Values at threat vary
Agricultural land Infrastructure Threatened species, wetlands Water
Responsiveness varies
Required intensity of management varies (but is generally high)
Myth: increase water use of annuals
Nat
iona
l Lan
d &
Wat
er R
esou
rce
Aud
it
Cost of management varies
Perennials profitable in some areas Unprofitable at high scale in most
Water efficient irrigation technologies available
Pumping is expensive
Myth: farmers can & will change land use sufficiently with existing options
Put it all together ...
Small areas have high priotityhigh threathigh valuehigher responsiveness to management low cost
Some have moderate priority Most have relatively low priority
Prioritising funds
We cannot buy a comprehensive solution
Focus $ support tightly onto high priority areas (or in ways that get high leverage)
Some catchments warrant few $ Investment framework
Myth: Sharing the money around evenly is “fair”
ICM
IntegratedFine
Catchment Many situations require local managemente.g. many farm problems, country towns
Management (Planning)Planning doesn’t get you adoptionWhat is the incentive?
Myth: ICM
Protecting an environmental asset
Diversion drain
Lake Toolibin
Lake Tarbilin
Pumps
Town Strategy Reveg farms?
Katanning Pump, seal creek No
Morawa Reduce recharge in town No
Brookton Pump (use to irrigate oval) Unlikely tohelp
Corrigin Pump (can use to irrigategardens)
No
Cranbrook Trees in the town to delay No
Merredin Pump, desalinate,supplement water supply
No
If not ICM then what?
Identify assets to protect Analyse best method to protect them
May be local, catchment scale or in between
Consider “living with” salinity Compare with other catchments Prioritise at level above catchment Concentrate funds to create incentive
“Living with salinity” options
Water resources: desalination
Built infrastructure: repair(Merredin townsite)
Cost of prevention Cost of repair$1.8 m to $4.6 m $0.4 m
Servicing the majority
Develop and promote technologies for salinity prevention (leverage)
Servicing the majority
Develop and promote methods for “living with” salinity
Which technologies?
Need a wide diversity They need to be profitable Existing suite inadequate Different methods suit different
situations/different problems
Asset Plants Engin.Agriculturalland
RechargeDischargeIrrigated
?
Water LocalisedExtensive
Biodiversity HotspotsDispersed
Infrastruct. LocalisedDispersed
Floods
Policy approaches
Policy instruments to encourage change on private landmarket-based instruments (NAP)subsidies (NHT)extension, information (Landcare) regulation
Direct works (e.g. on public land) Technology development & industry
development
Policyinstru-ments
Directworks
Tech.devel
Agriculture RechargeDischargeIrrigated
Water LocalisedExtensive
Biodiversity HotspotsDispersed
Infrastruct. LocalisedDispersed ?
?
Floods
Recommendations 1
Adopt a framework to assess and target salinity investments
Reverse the planning approach: asset based, not catchment based
Prioritise at state or national scale, not only catchment scale
Modify role of catchment planning groups
Recommendations 2
Allow time and resources for analysis of options. Provide technical support.
Adopt targets which come from analysis, not from desires
Include options for “living with salinity” in the analysis
Recommendations 3
De-emphasise policy instruments to achieve land-use change (including market-based instruments)
Recognise direct govt action (fully funded works, purchase water)
Change the nature of extension & communicationPromote properly evaluated technologies
Recommendations 4
Allocate 10-15% of salinity budget to technology development and industry developmentPlants (CRC)Engineering (CSIRO)
Keep an open mind and expect it to need to be changed
http://welcome.to/seanews
AcknowledgementsSelect Committee on Salinity Tom Hatton, David BennettGrains Research and Development Corp.