Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Managing Agricultural Phosphorus for Environmental Protection
J. Thomas SimsPeter J.A. Kleinman
Nature of nonpoint P• Wide array of processes
transport P from ag fields to surface and shallow groundwater– Erosion– Interflow– Overland flow– Matrix flow– Preferential flow
• P controls eutrophication in most freshwater systems
Eutrophication• P pollution became
apparent in the 70’s and 80’s
• Reduction in point sources helped in some places
• Still the most pervasive surface water impairment in the US
• Ag is now the major source of P
Controlling non-point
• Much more difficult than point source– Need cooperation from growers
• Some voluntary measures have become mandatory.
• Many new BMP’s in place now, and also being reasearched.
Definitions“A practical affordable
approach to conserving a farm’s soil and water resources without sacrificing productivity”
-Ontario Federation of agriculture, 2004
“Management practices used to control the generation or delivery of pollutants from agricultural activities to water resources and to prevent impacts to the physical and biological integrity of surface and groundwater”
-Osmond et al. 1995
Questions
• Conserving resources and improving agricultural productivity
Or
• Practices implemented, sometimes involuntarily, to reduce non-point source pollution.
2 key principles• Control of soil erosion
– Riparian buffers– Grass filter strips– Terraces– Strip cropping– Constructed wetlands
• Nutrient management– Prudent application – Recommended
practices to minimize P loss
Tillage
• Reducing tillage decreases particulate P losses
• But…• Conservation tillage
can increase dissolved P losses over time
Tillage
Manure
• Highly over fertilized soils in regions dominated by animal production
• P has accumulated in these soils, well above the amount for optimum for crop growth
• Can be significant sources of soluble and bioavailable particulate P losses
• Would take many years to remediate• Comprehensive nutrient management plans
need to be adopted
Scale?
• Look at the cause of the problem
• Alternatives to land application of manure
Nutrient management
• “Managing the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the application of nutrients and soil amendments.”– Budget and supply nutrients for plant
production– Properly use manure or organic byproducts– Minimize ag nonpoint pollution– Maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of the soil
NMP’s need to address:
• To effectively scale up NMP’s, some considerations need to be taken into account.
• The watershed• County/state• The region• Nation/international region
Farm scale BMP’s
• Balance inputs and outputs– Inputs: animal feeds,
fertilizers, biosolids, uptake from subsoil and natural additions
– Outputs: harvested portions of crops, animal products, losses to air, soil, or water.
Fertilizer management• Excessive import of
mineral fertilizers, not seen as a problem
• Regular soil testing is key
• Prescriptive application of mineral fertilizer using methods that maximize the availability of P
Feed Management
• Amount of P in feed for CAFO’s
• Import more P in feed than is exported in crops and animal products
• 50% or more of the imported P stays on the farm
Reductions in CAFO P• In swine and poultry,
alternative feeding strategies can reduce output
• Phytase enzyme• Dairy cattle typically
overfed P• Grass based grazing
systems better, up to 80%
Manure Export
• Reduce nutrient surpluses by re-locating animal manure to farms deficient in P
• High costs relating to the transport of the manure
• Pelletizing poultry litter• In DE, ~1440 Mg of P were moved to
different farms, out of ~6800 Mg produced that year.
Manure storage
• Provides flexibility for manure management
• Allows land application for when crops are growing
• 3-month storage resulted in the most cost-effective control of non-point P
Barnyard and feedlot• Combination of impervious surfaces and high
concentrations of animals causes these areas to be point source polluters
• Improved barnyard management resulted in the largest reduction in watershed P, and was the most cost-effective BMP studied
• A vegetative filter removed 90% of total P from milk house waste on a dairy farm
• Constructed wetlands slow runoff, and let particulate matter settle.
Soil testing• Should be an integral part
of any NMP• Helps save money, and
gauges the effectiveness of your current practices
• NRCS recommends 3 year minimum testing
• 15-30 cm deep• Traditional P tests
correlate well with runoff and subsurface flow
Manure testing
• Concerns: obtaining a representative sample, and rapid application of manure after testing
• Primarily concerned with Nitrate• P testing is now becoming mandatory• Difficult to estimate how much will be plant
available
Timing and methods
• Methods of application greatly influence P loss in runoff
• Often broadcast, maybe tillage
• Incorporation is best, also methods to reduce erosion help
Methods
• Effective depth of interaction is 1.3 -37.4 mm
• Cultivating reduces soluble P losses, but increases particulate P loss
• Injection and knifing are good solutions
Application Rate
• Has a direct impact on dissolved P losses from broadcast manures
• A strong relationship exists between dry matter application rate of various manures and the fraction of P in dissolved form (graph on previous slide)
• Starter fertilizer is often added even if it is not needed to boost yields
Timing
• Immediately after application, risk for loss is highest
• Declines over time as P is bound in the soil
Management of Runoff, Erosion, and subsurface flow in Ag fields
Transport oriented:– Improve infiltration– Reduce slope length– Increase soil cover– Intercepting runoff
water
Cultivation Practices
• Conservation tillage– Leaves at least 30% of soil covered with
residue• Over time, can increase the amount of
dissolved P losses• Best solution?
Cover Crops
• Grasses, legumes, or other crops that protect the soil, and scavenge excess nutrients
• Improve soil structure, and SOM• Where dissolved P is the greatest
concern, cover crops aren’t as effective
Artificial Drainage
• Improve soil productivity
• Decrease runoff and soil erosion
• May dump directly into water bodies, reducing the impact of other BMP’s
Buffers
Grassed Waterways
• Prevent channel erosion
• Can intercept runoff and break up slope length
• Up to 20x erosion prevention
• Contour cultivating is similar
Irrigation Management / Stream bank Protection
• Irrigation can greatly increase erosion, exacerbating particulate P losses
• Application timing can greatly reduce this• Exclude livestock from near streams• Up to 76% reduction in P loads• Funding for bank protection is available
from the NRCS
BMP Systems
• While one BMP can be effective at reducing P pollution, combinations of BMP’s are the most effective.
• Varies from region to region• 75% of critical areas in a watershed must
be treated with appropriate BMP’s to achieve water quality standards
Watershed Scale• Impacted by many
farmers and point sources
• Prioritize the watersheds in an area
• In the bay, 25% of agland used BMP’s, after 10 years, only 9% reduction in non point pollution
• Even if P applications stop, could take 20 years to decline
Delmarva Peninsula• In 96’ environmental
groups filed a lawsuit against USEPA
• EPA made 10 yr timetable
• Public got involved after fish kills
• MD and DE passed Nutrient management laws
Research on BMP’s / PSI
• Develop improved animal feeding strategies
• Stabilize P in less soluble forms
• Improve PSI to provide more quantitative estimates of P loss.
• Phosphorus Site Index
• Site specific evaluations of P transport factors
• Required for areas where the M-3 test value is >150 mg/kg
Lake Erie• In the 60’s and 70’s suffered from severe
eutrophication from excessive P loading• Impacts on aquatic species were so extreme the
lake was considered “dead”• Since then, major improvements have been
made• An average of $7000 per farm was spent in the
river watersheds.• Education is credited with reducing fertilizer
sales by 37% and 25%
Future directions
• Since not all farms or fields contribute equally, there is no silver bullet
• Finding critical areas is important• A more rapid means to conduct P loss
assessments is needed, particularly at larger scales.
• Many BMP’s are limited to single fields or farms
Cost effective and flexible• Best way to encourage
growers is to reduce costs
• Worries over point source• Many local governments
have adopted some policies
• Ability to change as new research is done