Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Management Information System
Achievements
Annual data entered for 97% schools in FY 2015-16
Monthly data (avg.) entered for 86% schools in FY 2015-16
Availability of database containing valuable micro and macro level data for Financial Year 2012-13 to 2015-16.
Availability of offline data entry module for blocks/districts with poor internet connectivity
Auto generation of Annual Work Plan & Budget reports
Access of crucial reports to users at Centre, State, District and Block for timely intervention
Areas of concern
• Timely entry of data into portal
• Quality of data entry into portal need to be closely monitored
• Need for utilization of MIS data for monitoring and planning purposes
• Submission of Annual Work Plan & Budget through MIS
Annual Data Entry Status: 2015-16
4 100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
98%
91%
67%
A & N Islands
Arunachal Pradesh
Chandigarh
D & N Haveli
Daman & Diu
Sikkim
Tripura
Odisha
West Bengal
Mizoram
Himachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Assam
Manipur
Nagaland
Delhi
Monthly Data Entry Status: 2015-16
100%
100%
100%
99%
99%
98%
98%
97%
94%
94%
93%
91%
89%
77%
63%
49%
Chandigarh
Daman & Diu
Tripura
Mizoram
Himachal Pradesh
Manipur
A & N Islands
West Bengal
Arunachal Pradesh
Odisha
D & N Haveli
Sikkim
Meghalaya
Assam
Delhi
Nagaland
67% 63%
60% 59% 55% 55% 54%49% 49%
37%31%
15%
0%
50%
100%
49 % Average Monthly Data Entry (Apr-March 2016)
Month-wise Data Entry Status: Nagaland
67% 67% 67% 67% 66% 66% 64% 63% 62% 61% 59%47%
0%
50%
100%
63 % Average Monthly Data Entry (Apr-March 2016)
Month-wise Data Entry Status: Delhi
96% 94% 94% 94% 94% 93% 93% 92%88%
44%
27%
14%
0%
50%
100%
77 % Average Monthly Data Entry (Apr-March 2016)
Month-wise Data Entry Status: Assam
97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 93% 90% 87% 86% 85%
44%
0%
50%
100%
89 % Average Monthly Data Entry (Apr-March 2016)
Month-wise Data Entry Status: Meghalaya
Analysis of Data..
83%
46%
0%
50%
100%
WOKHA MON
Annual Data Entry 2015-16
District-wise Data Entry Status: Nagaland
Districts with average data entry <=91% (State Avg.)
36%
24% 22% 20%13%
0%
50%
% Average Monthly Data Entry (April-March 2016)
District-wise Data Entry Status: Nagaland
Districts with average data entry <=49% (State Avg.)
58%
44%
0%
30%
60%
MCD DCB
Annual Data Entry 2015-16
District-wise Data Entry Status: Delhi
Districts with average data entry <=68% (State Avg.)
56%
38%
0%
30%
60%
MCD DCB
% Average Monthly Data Entry (April-March 2016)
District-wise Data Entry Status: Delhi
Districts with average data entry <=64% (State Avg.)
76% 76% 75% 75% 75% 75% 73% 73% 72%63%
53%
31%
0%
50%
100%
% Average Monthly Data Entry (April-March 2016)
District-wise Data Entry Status : Assam
State Average <= 77%
73% 68%
0%
50%
100%
RI BHOI JAINTIA HILLS
% Average Monthly Data Entry (April-March 2016)
District-wise Data Entry Status: Meghalaya
Districts with average data entry <=89% (State Avg.)
Comparison of Data: AWP&B v/s MIS (2015-16)
Coverage of Children
18
8196
78
7892
82
8852
47
69
94
88
92
86
73
85
80 86
79
79
91
84
87
52
64
96
97
60
90
88
74 82
0
50
100
ANDAMAN &NICOBABAR
ASSAM
DAMAN & DIU
DADARA & NAGARHAVELI
HIMACHAL PRADESH
MANIPUR
MEGHALAYA
CHANDIGARH
DELHI
WEST BENGAL
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
NAGALAND
MIZORAM
SIKKIM
TRIPURA
Odisha
Children covered (QPR) Children covered (MIS)
Figures denote % coverage of children against enrolment
Working Days
19
99
97
100
100
100
92
82
99
898899
70
92
100
100
99
99
89
100
99
100
94
9796
93
90
97
84
94
97
10095
0
50
100ANDAMAN & NICOBABAR
ASSAM
DAMAN & DIU
DADARA & NAGAR HAVELI
HIMACHAL PRADESH
MANIPUR
MEGHALAYA
CHANDIGARH
DELHI
WEST BENGAL
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
NAGALAND
MIZORAM
SIKKIM
TRIPURA
Odisha
Working days (QPR) Working days (MIS)
Figures denote % coverage of working days against PAB approval
Utilization of Food Grains
20
68
100
62
53
79
67
100
4741
46
70
100
83 8175
6567 6762
53
91
79 79
0
69
48
58
74 79
56
7771
0
50
100
QPR MIS
Utilization of Cooking Cost
21
50 5259
55
7366
90
74
1
89
76
50
62
46
71
63
0
43
0
55
76
55
71
4
5359
69
44
76
85
76
100
0
50
100
QPR MIS
Salient features of proposed Automated Monitoring System
Project to be roll out the in decentralized manner i.e. through States/UTs.
States/UTs are required to set up their own system or through a State/UT agency or select of agency or service provider for setting up the system.
Relevant documents like DPR/RFP/contract documents of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have been shared with States/UTs for guidance.
States/UTs will be required to push the data on certain parameters to the Central server maintained by NIC. (XML format already shared)
Central portal for analysis and display of data will be developed and managed by NIC.
The payment to the service provider is to be made on the basis of unit rate per successful transaction.
The expenditure on the project may be met from the MME funds allocated to the States/UTs.
Timelines
23
S.No. Activities / Deliverables Timeline
1 Circulation of
a) DPR/RFP/Contract document of U.P. and Bihar to
all States / UTs.
b) Model template RFP prepared in consultation with
NIC to all States / UTs.
9thMarch, 2016
2 Prototype of the proposed national portal 9thMarch, 2016
3 Development of API and central application with
dashboard
20th March, 2016
4 Launch of the Central application 31st March, 2016
5 Collection and validation of mobile number of HMs and
nodal teachers by State/UT
31st March, 2016
6 Finalization of Central data storage facility 20th April, 2016
Contd..
24
7 a) Select an agency or a service provider for
setting up the automated monitoring system
30th April, 2016
b) Provide training to HMs and nodal teachers
through VC / video tutorials or other suitable
modes
c) Finalized data storage and data transmission
arrangements
8 Complete setting up of automated system for daily
data collection including populating Master Data of
mobile phone numbers and training to teachers.
31st May, 2016
9 Integrate the system with NIC Central portal for
transmission of data in define formats
15th June, 2016
10 Go Live: Roll out the automated system of
monitoring
25th June, 2016
11 Provide daily mid day meal data of the number of
students being served and reasons of not serving
meal, in case meal was not served, in respective
schools.
25th June, 2016
onwards (daily)
Timelines
S.
No. State / UT
Total
number of
schools
Total number of
schools for
which mobile
number of
teachers
collected
Total number of
schools for which
mobile number of
teachers validated
Current Status
1 ANDAMAN &
NICOBABAR 338 338
Under progress Development of
application in progress
2
ASSAM
57085 46982 46982
Finalization of RFP in
consultation with State
NIC
3 DAMAN & DIU 99 99 99
4 DADARA & NAGAR
HAVELI
5
HIMACHAL
PRADESH
15327 15327 15327
1) Needs approval for
free SMS service
from TRAI
2) Addition of some
new features in MIS
like Joining and
relieving of the
CHTs, HTs, JBTs
using ARMS at
BEEO level
6 MANIPUR 3369 5232 In progress
7 MEGHALAYA 1569 1569 In progress
Latest Status of Automated Monitoring System
Note: None of the State/UT has shared master data with NIC as per format shared Contd..
8
CHANDIGARH
120 120 120
UT will opt the model of NIC, HP and in this regard Required Information already sent to NIC HP through NIC UT and development is under process.
9 DELHI 3060 998 998
10 WEST BENGAL
83673 66030 62479 In progress
11 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 3428 2096 2096
12
NAGALAND
2060 2038 Under process Compiling Data as
per the master format received .
S.
No. State / UT
Total
number of
schools
Total number of
schools for
which mobile
number of
teachers
collected
Total number of
schools for which
mobile number of
teachers validated
Current Status
Contd.. Note: None of the State/UT has shared master data with NIC as per format shared
13
MIZORAM
2581 2491 2491 Collection of data is being completed
14
Odisha
62784 62073 61329
1-Cook-cum-Helper on-line fund transfer application developed & piloted very shortly. 2-Validation of mobile nos. of Asst. Teacher is in process.
15 SIKKIM 864 864 864
16 TRIPURA 6556 6556 6556
S. No. State / UT
Total
number of
schools
Total number of
schools for
which mobile
number of
teachers
collected
Total number of
schools for which
mobile number of
teachers validated
Current Status
Note: None of the State/UT has shared master data with NIC as per format shared
