Upload
fedsmith-inc
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
1/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014
Effective communication from organizational leaders isneeded to establish a transparent, positive work environ-
ment. There is a statistically significant correlation be-tween effective workplace communication and employee
job satisfaction,1but communicating effectively and mo-
tivating employees is a challenge for many leaders.In this Best Places to Work in the Federal Government
snapshot, the Partnership for Public Service and Deloitteconsidered three questions from the Office of Personnel
Managements (OPM) 2013 Federal Employee ViewpointSurvey to measure employee satisfaction with leadershipcommunication in their agencies. The questions covered
the communication of goals and priorities, the informa-tion provided to different work units and employee sat-
isfaction with information they receive regarding what istaking place in the organization.
Based on employees responses to these questions, acommunications index was created to measure how sat-isfied employees are with information they are receiving
from their senior leaders and managers. To understandrecent trends, data from the past five years was analyzed.
1 Deloitte Consulting LLP, Silencing the static: Engaging employeesin an unsettled environment, July 2014.
2013 BEST PLACES TO WORK IN THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ANALYSIS
Making An Impact ThroughEffective LeadershipCommunication
Leadership communication and Best Places toWork Index trends
Index score Leadership Communication score
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
2/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 2
GOVERNMENT-WIDE RESULTS
Managers communicate the goals andpriorities of the organization (Q)
Percentage of positive responses government-wide on communication questions
How satisfied are you with the informationyou receive from management on whatsgoing on in your organization? (Q)
Managers promote communication among
different work units (for example aboutprojects goals needed resources) (Q)
Our Best Places to Work analysis
shows that employee satisfactionwith their leaders communication
is low and has been dropping on av-erage across the federal government.
The 2013 government-wide lead-
ership communication index score is50.2 out of 100, indicating that only
half of the federal workforce is satis-fied with the level of communication
it is receiving from those in leadershippositions at their agencies. This score
represents a 3.9 point drop since 2009.From 2009 to 2013, more than 60
percent of the agencies for which
data are available registered a de-crease in satisfaction with leadership
communication.2 This result under-
scores the need for leaders to focuson improving communication withtheir employees. Overall, the rank-ings on leadership communication
closely mirror theBest Places to Workindex rankings, highlighting the link
between leadership communicationand overall employee satisfaction.
2 Data available for 2009 and 2013 for 56 outof 71 large, mid-size and small agencies.
The factors behind the leadershipcommunication scores
Of the three survey questions used tomeasure federal employee satisfac-tion with leadership communication,
the lowest score was represented by
the information employees receivefrom management on what is goingon in their organization. Only 44.8
percent of employees respondedpositively on this question in 2013compared to 48.1 percent in 2009, as
shown below.In addition, less than half of fed-
eral employees surveyed throughoutthe federal government are satisfied
with the extent to which managerspromote communication among workunits. The government-wide score on
this question dropped from 54.5 per-cent in 2009 to 48.2 percent in 2013.
At the same time, 57.5 percent be-lieve their managers communicate
the goals and priorities of the or-ganization, the highest score of thethree questions. The 2013 score,
however, represents a 2.2 point de-crease from 2009.
Government trails theprivate sector
According to data provided by HayGroup, 60 percent of private sec-tor employees are satisfied with
the information they receive from
management on what is going onin their organization.3 The govern-ments score on this same question,
the only one for which there is com-parative data, is 15.2 points lower,highlighting a disparity in satisfac-
tion with this aspect of leadershipcommunication.
Agency highlights
Despite the overall negative trendregarding employee satisfaction
with leadership communication
across the government, agency-spe-cific results show wide variations intheir communications index scores.
3 Partnership for Public Service, PrivateSector Comparison, The Best Places to Workin the Federal Government 2013 Rankings,http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/over-view/analysis/private_sector_comparison.php (accessed 24 July 2014).
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
3/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 3
The Best Places to Worktrends
indicate a decline in employee
satisfaction with leadership
communication across government,
a worrisome sign since leadership
communication can have a
significant impact on employee
attitudes toward their jobs and
workplaces. Leaders should
take affirmative steps to keep
employees better informed about
organizational and work unit goals
and activities. Increased efforts
to effectively communicate with
employees can help improve
job and workplace satisfaction
and, ultimately, employee
commitment and productivity.
Among large agencies, scores
range from 68.0 at the National Aero-nautics and Space Administration
(NASA) compared to only 38.8 per-cent at the Department of HomelandSecurity (DHS). The scores for mid-
size agencies range from 68.8 percentat the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) to 41.3 percentat the Broadcasting Board of Gover-
nors (BBG). Among small agencies,the Surface Transportation Board
has a leadership communicationscore of 75.9, compared to a scoreof only 34.1 at the Office of the U.S.
Trade Representative.While about half of the agencies
for which data were available reg-
istered declines in their leadershipcommunication scores from 2012 to2013, there were several that showedconsiderable improvement. The lead-
ership communication index scorefor the Office of the Inspector Gen-
eral in the Department of Commerce,for example, increased by 18.4 points.
Additionally, the scores for the U.S.International Trade Commission and
STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO IMPROVE THE IMPACT OF YOUR LEADERSHIP COMMUNICATIONS
two subcomponents within the De-
partment of Justicethe CriminalDivision and the Antitrust Division
all increased by more than 11 points.While there is a tendency in a vol-
atile and uncertain environment tostifle communications, some agencyleaders resisted this trend during the
last few years of budget cuts, hiringfreezes and the government shut-
down by increasing their interactionswith employees. The agencies that
scored high on leadership commu-nication have tended to be proactive,making a concerted effort to keep
employees informed and engaged re-garding what is taking place within
their organizations.
NASA, for example, hosts a VirtualExecutive Summit that allows Ad-ministrator Charles Bolden to con-nect with employees using online
tools. This initiative demonstrateshow agency leaders can leverage
technology to engage in meaningfulinteractions with employees even
when these employees are based indiverse geographic locations. NASAs
managers also actively seek employ-
ee feedback through focus groupand surveys, customizing questions
based on their immediate relevanceto the agency.
Summary
Low levels of employee satisfactionwith leadership communication in2013 go hand-in-hand with lower
employee satisfaction scores across-the-board. While some agencies
have prioritized effective leadershipcommunication, government-wide
satisfaction levels on leadershipcommunication have decreased in
recent years. Agencies will need tomake a concerted effort to increaseleadership communication in order
to reverse this negative trend.
Below are some approaches to consider to improve the effectiveness of lead-ership communication. These approaches are based on actions taken by someof the most improved and best performing agencies that the Partnership for
Public Service has highlighted over the years in theBest Places to Workrank-ings as well as in the 2013 report by the Partnership and Deloitte, Ten Years
of theBest Places to Workin the Federal Government Rankings.
Make communication a consistent priority for leadership
Establishing effective leadership communication does not happen overnight.
In order to effectively drive communication, agency leaders must consistentlyfocus on improving and maintaining quality communication, not just engag-
ing in short-lived initiatives.The FDIC, for example, established leadership communication as a key
agency priority by launching regular initiatives that put employees directly in
contact with the agencys leaders on a regular basis. Leaders began holdingquarterly call-ins where employees from around the country can speak directly
with the agencys chairman. These call-ins are unscripted, allowing employeesto ask any questions they have and obtain answers directly from agency lead-
ership. The agency also holds both virtual and in-person town hall meetings,creating multiple venues where employees can receive information from seniorleadership.
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
4/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 4
Communicate with employees through multiple platforms
Not all employees prefer to receive and convey information through the same medi-
um. In order to effectively communicate with all staff, agency leaders should strive tocommunicate with employees through multiple platforms. From more conventional
means of leadership communication, such as one-on-one discussions and emails, tomore innovative communication methods, such as video conferencing and social me-dia, leaders should leverage a range of platforms to communicate with employees.
The management at the U.S. Mint, for example, uses multiple communications
platforms to increase internal communication. While the public affairs office lever-ages electronic communications such as an internal television network and an onlinequestion and answer box, it also provides print-outs of online content in common
areas to ensure that all employees have access to information from agency leadership.
Maintain open and direct communication between managers and employees
Effective communication is only possible when agency leadershipfrom senior lead-
ers to managersmaintains open, direct lines with employees. Agencies can fosteropen leadership communication in many ways, from holding regular town hall meet-ings and hosting office hours where employees meet directly with leaders, to orga-
nizing webinars that allow leaders to overcome geographical hurdles and engageemployees located outside agency headquarters.
The chairman of the Federal Labor Relations Authority demonstrated her com-
mitment to open communication by holding town hall meetings for all employees,including employees at regional offices across the country. The agency also has putin place regular meetings where leadership shares information and directly solicits
ideas from employees for improvement. These strategies give employees a direct lineof contact with the agency leadership.
Implement employee suggestions to convey commitment to communication
Soliciting employees opinions is an initial step toward improving agency commu-
nication. Simply collecting these ideas, though, does little to improve satisfaction ifemployees believe agency leadership does not receive and use their feedback. When
leaders utilize ideas generated by agency staff, however, employees receive a clearmessage that their voice is both heard and valued.
The Department of Transportation (DOT) launched an online community, Idea-
Hub, where agency employees can submit and collaborate on ideas to drive inno-vation and change. Once these ideas are refined, they are communicated online toeveryone at the agency and to the individual who originally submitted the idea. Bynot only collecting, but implementing employee ideas and communicating this in-
formation back to agency staff, DOTs leadership demonstrates that communicationwith employees is taken seriously.
Consider a holistic framework
Adopting a strategic approach to improving leadership communication can be an ef-fective way to drive change in an agency. Deloitte outlined four key stages as part of a
holistic framework to foster effective communication.4First, agencies should assessthe state of communication within the organization, taking stock of employee con-
cerns and the agencys current communications strategy. This initial assessment al-lows agency leaders to develop goals for improving communication moving forward,possibly including metrics to gauge progress and guidelines for advancing communi-
cation. After formulating this strategy, the agency can develop and begin using newcommunications channels. Once these strategies are in place, agencies can further
improve the effectiveness of leadership communication by measuring the successof these new approaches and by revising these strategies as needed based on em-
ployee feedback. By approaching communication strategically, leaders can moreeffectively and systematically improve leadership communication.
4 Deloitte Consulting LLP, Silencing the static: Engaging employees in an unsettled environment,July 2014.
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
5/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 5
Large agency leadership communication rankings
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(2012-2013)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Intelligence Community
Department of the Treasury -
Social Security Administration -
Department of Commerce
Department of the Navy -
Office of the Secretary of Defense Joint Staff Defense Agencies
and Department of Defense Field Activities
Department of State -
Department of Health and Human Services -
Department of Transportation
Department of the Air Force -
Department of Justice
Department of Labor -
Environmental Protection Agency -
Department of the Army -
Department of Veterans Affairs
Department of Agriculture
Department of the Interior -
Department of Homeland Security -
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
6/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 6
-- = Not available
Mid-size agency leadership communication rankings
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(2012-2013)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation -
Nuclear Regulatory Commission -
Federal Trade Commission -
Federal Communications Commission
Office of Personnel Management
National Credit Union Administration -
General Services Administration -
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Government Printing Office --
Small Business Administration
US Agency for International Development -
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission -
Department of Education
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency -
National Science Foundation
Department of Energy -
National Labor Relations Board -
National Archives and Records Administration
Securities and Exchange Commission
Department of Housing and Urban Development -
Broadcasting Board of Governors
NA Government Accountability Office -- --
NA Smithsonian Institution -- --
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
7/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 7
Small agency leadership communication rankings
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(2012-2013)
Surface Transportation Board
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Overseas Private Investment Corporation -
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service
National Endowment for the Humanities
Peace Corps -
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board
Selective Service System
US International Trade Commission
Railroad Retirement Board
National Endowment for the Arts
Millennium Challenge Corporation
Merit Systems Protection Board -
Corporation for National and Community Service -
Office of Special Counsel -
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation -
Office of Management and Budget -
National Gallery of Art
Federal Housing Finance Agency
International Boundary and Water Commission
National Transportation Safety Board -
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board -
Federal Election Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission -
Export-Import Bank of the United States -
Federal Maritime Commission
Office of the US Trade Representative
NA Farm Credit Administration -- --
-- = Not available
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
8/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 8
Agency subcomponent innovation rankings
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
John C Stennis Space Center (NASA)
George C Marshall Space Flight Center (NASA)
Federal Highway Administration (DOT)
Patent and Trademark Office (Commerce)
Office of the Inspector General (DOT)
Office of the Inspector General (GSA)
Office of the Inspector General (Treasury)
Civil Division (DOJ)
Office of the Inspector General for Tax Administration (Treasury)
Bureau of Economic Analysis (Commerce)
Naval Reserve Force (Navy)
Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA)
Lyndon B Johnson Space Center (NASA) -
John F Kennedy Space Center (NASA)
Office of the Executive Director (FERC) --
Air Force Office of Special Investigations (Air Force)
Naval Special Warfare Command (Navy) -
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (Treasury) -
Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development (ED) --
Employee Services (OPM) -
Merit System Audit and Compliance (OPM) --
Langley Research Center (NASA) -
Office of the Inspector General (Interior)
John Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field (NASA)
Field Operating Offices of Office of the Secretary of the Army (Army) -
Office of the General Counsel (FERC) --
Bureau of Industry and Security (Commerce)
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (Treasury) -
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DOD)
Office of the Inspector General (VA) -
Healthcare and Insurance (OPM) --
Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OPM) --
Office of the Inspector General (OPM) --
Office of the Inspector General (ED)
Environment and Natural Resources Division (DOJ) -
Air Force Elements US Transportation Command (Air Force)
Facilities - Security - Contracting (OPM) --
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
9/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 9
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
US Air Forces Europe (Air Force)
Economic Research Service (USDA)
Defense Security Service (DOD)
Civilian Career Training (Air Force) -
Federal Railroad Administration (DOT)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (HHS)
Office of the Chief Financial Officer (ED) -
Joint Activities (Army)
Health Resources and Services Administration (HHS)
Dryden Flight Research Center (NASA)
Headquarters (NASA) -
Research and Innovative Technology Administration (DOT) -
HR Solutions (OPM)
Federal Acquisition Service (GSA)
Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DHS) --
Ames Research Center (NASA)
Office of Enforcement (FERC) --
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (DOT) -
Pretrial Services Agency (CSOSA) -
Office of the Inspector General (USDA)
Tax Division (DOJ)
Office of the Inspector General (EPA) -
Region - Philadelphia (EPA) -
Defense Logistics Agency (DOD)
Region - Atlanta (EPA)
Office of the Chief Financial Officer (GSA)
Office of Governmentwide Policy (GSA)
Bonneville Power Administration (DOE)
Retirement Services (OPM)
Office of Administration and Resources Management (EPA) -
Federal Investigative Service (OPM)
Office of the Chief Information Officer (ED) --
Office of Field Policy and Management (HUD) -
Internal Revenue Service (Treasury) -
Naval Education and Training Command (Navy) -
Bureau of Engraving and Printing (Treasury)
Strategic Systems Programs Office (Navy) -
Public Buildings Service (GSA) -
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
10/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 10
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
US Army Accessions Command (Army)
Office of Labor-Management Standards (DOL) -
Office of the Inspector General (Commerce)
US Special Operations Command (Army) -
Administration for Community Living (HHS) --
Office of Energy Market Regulation (FERC) --
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS) -
Missile Defense Agency (DOD)
Global Strike Command (Air Force)
Food Nutrition and Consumer Services (USDA)
Bureau of the Public Debt (Treasury) -
National Technical Information Service (Commerce) --
Office of Management (ED) -
Region - Denver (EPA) -
Civil Rights Division (DOJ)
Bureau of Labor Statistics (DOL) -
US Army Acquisition Support Center (Army) -
Air Combat Command (Air Force) -
Office of Naval Research (Navy) -
National Cemetery Administration (VA)
US Army Space and Missile Defense CommandUS Army Forces
Strategic Command (Army)
Air Force Audit Agency (Air Force) -
United States Coast Guard (DHS) -
US Trustees Program (DOJ) -
Air Force Special Operations Command (Air Force) -
Wage and Hour Division (DOL) -
Office of the Secretary (Commerce)
US Mint (Treasury) -
Office of the Secretary (DOT) -
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (DOT) -
Institute of Education Sciences (ED) --
Region - Kansas City (EPA) -
Drug Enforcement Administration (DOJ)
Office of Energy Projects (FERC) --
Naval Air Systems Command (Navy) -
Office of the Chief Information Officer (OPM) -
Executive Office of US Attorneys and US Attorneys (DOJ)
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
11/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 1
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
Departmental Offices (Treasury)
Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA) --
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HHS) -
Office of Justice Programs (DOJ) -
Naval Supply Systems Command (Navy)
Justice Management Division (DOJ)
Naval Medical Command (Navy)
All Other Components (Air Force) --
US Army Forces Command (Army) -
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED)
Region - New York (EPA)
Office of the Solicitor (DOL) -
Pacific Air Forces (Air Force)
Air National Guard Support Center (Air Force)
Naval Sea Systems Command (Navy)
Headquarters - Air Force Reserve (Air Force)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (DOL) -
US Atlantic Fleet - Commander In Chief (Navy)
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (DHS)
Field Operating Agencies of the Army Staff Resourced Through OA- (Army)
Food and Drug Administration (HHS) -
US Army Training and Doctrine Command (Army) -
Assistant for Administration - Under Secretary of the Navy (Navy) -
Office of the Secretary of the Army (Army)
Office of the Chief Information Officer (GSA)
Air Force Elements US Northern Command (Air Force) -
Federal Bureau of Investigation (DOJ)
Headquarters and Support Elements (Air Force) -
Citizenship and Immigration Services (DHS)
Air Force Elements US Special Operations Command (Air Force) -
US Army Reserve Command (Army)
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DOD)
National Institutes of Health (HHS) -
Air Mobility Command (Air Force) -
Bureau of the Census (Commerce) -
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (Navy)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (Commerce) -
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (Navy) -
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
12/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 12
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
Bureau of Naval Personnel (Navy) -
Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA) -
Defense Contract Management Agency (DOD) -
US Geological Survey (Interior)
Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA) -
Federal Aviation Administration (DOT)
Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DOD)
Office of the Inspector General (DHS) -
Office of the General Counsel (GSA) --
US Pacific Fleet - Commander In Chief (Navy) -
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (Interior)
Office of the Secretary (HHS) -
Office for Civil Rights (ED)
Region - Dallas (EPA) -
Region - San Francisco (EPA) -
Veterans Benefits Administration (VA)
US Fish and Wildlife Service (Interior) -
Office of Community Planning and Development (HUD) -
Air Force Elements US Strategic Command (Air Force) -
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA) --
US Army Pacific (Army) -
Office of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau (Army) -
Antitrust Division (DOJ)
Defense Information Systems Agency (DOD) -
Farm Service Agency (USDA) -
Defense Human Resources Activity (DOD)
Employee Benefits Security Administration (DOL) -
Region - Boston (EPA) -
Federal Student Aid (ED) -
US Air Force Academy (Air Force) -
Criminal Division (DOJ)
Programs - Staff - Field Offices (DOE) --
Marine Corps (Navy) -
US Army Military District of Washington (Army)
Office of Air and Radiation (EPA) -
Air Force Materiel Command (Air Force) -
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (DOT)
Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (GSA)
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
13/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 13
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
Civil Engineering Center (Air Force) --
Risk Management Agency (USDA) -
US Military Entrance Processing Command (Army)
Office of the Chief Financial Officer (EPA) -
Office of the Inspector General (DOJ) -
Military Sealift Command (Navy) -
Executive Office for Immigration Review (DOJ) -
US Marshals Service (DOJ)
Washington Headquarters Services (DOD) --
Departmental Administration (USDA) -
Agricultural Research Service (USDA)
Office of Policy Development and Research (HUD) -
Space Command (Air Force) -
Office of the Chief Financial Officer (HUD)
Air Education and Training Command (Air Force) -
US Army Corps of Engineers (Army) -
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (Commerce)
US Army Europe (Army) -
Air National Guard Units (Mobilization) (Title ) (Air Force) -
Financial Management Service (Treasury) -
Immediate Office of the Chief-of-Staff of the Army (Army) -
Commander - Navy Installations (Navy)
Department of Defense Education Activity (DOD) -
Bureau of Land Management (Interior) -
Office of the General Counsel (HUD) -
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (ED) -
US Army Medical Command (Army) -
Administration for Children and Families (HHS) -
International Trade Administration (Commerce)
Office of the Secretary of the Interior (Interior) -
Federal Transit Administration (DOT) -
Office of Workers Compensation Programs (DOL) -
Veterans Health Administration (VA) -
US Army Installation Management Agency (Army) -
Bureau of Reclamation (Interior) -
Maritime Administration (DOT)
Office of the General Counsel (USDA)
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (HUD) -
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
14/15
PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | JULY 2014 14
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
Bureau of PrisonsFederal Prison System (DOJ)
Community Supervision Program (CSOSA) --
US Army Materiel Command (Army) -
Grain Inspection Packers and Stockyards Administration (USDA) --
Assistant Secretary for Housing - Federal Housing Commissioner (HUD) -
TRICARE Management Activity (DOD) -
Rural Development (USDA) -
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management (DOL) -
Office of the Inspector General (DOD) --
Office of Public and Indian Housing (HUD) -
US Army Criminal Investigation Command (Army) -
Office of Research and Development (EPA) -
Mine Safety and Health Administration (DOL) -
Power Marketing Administrations (DOE) -
Office of the Administrator (EPA) -
Immediate Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (Navy) -
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA) --
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Commerce) -
Office of Environmental Information (EPA)
Headquarters Air Intelligence Agency (Air Force) -
All Other Components (DOJ) --
Veterans Employment and Training Services (DOL)
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (DOL)
Central Office (VA) -
Office of Water (EPA) -
Naval Intelligence Command (Navy) -
Management Directorate (DHS) -
International Broadcasting Bureau (BBG) -
Secret Service (DHS) -
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (DOJ)
Employment and Training Administration (DOL) -
US Army Central (Army) --
Office of Enforcement Compliance Assurance (EPA) -
Office of the Inspector General (DOL) -
Air Force Personnel Center (Air Force) -
Joint Services and Activities Supported By the Office Secretary of the Army (Army) -
National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE) -
Office of Cuba Broadcasting (BBG) --
8/12/2019 Making An Impact Through Effective Leadership Communication
15/15
RANK AGENCY
LEADERSHIP
COMMUNICATION
SCORE (2013)
POINT CHANGE
(-)
Region - Seattle (EPA) -
Air Force District of Washington (Air Force) -
Region - Chicago (EPA) -
Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS) -
National Park Service (Interior) -
US Army Netcomth Army Signal Command (Army) -
Office of Chief Procurement Officer (HUD) --
Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (HUD) -
US Army Test and Evaluation Command (Army)
US Army Intelligence and Security Command (Army) -
National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA)
Office of Surface Mining (Interior) -
US Army North (Army) --
Defense Commissary Agency (DOD) -
Indian Health Service (HHS) -
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (HHS) -
Office of the Secretary (DHS) -
Intelligence and Analysis (DHS) -
Forest Service (USDA) -
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (EPA) -
Voice of America (BBG)
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Interior) -
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (EPA) -
Office of Chief Information Officer (HUD)
Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA) -
Transportation Security Administration (DHS) -
Administrative Law Judges (DOL) --
Customs and Border Protection (DHS) -
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Interior) -
Office of Postsecondary Education (ED) -
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS) -
National Protection and Programs Directorate (DHS) -
Office of the Solicitor (Interior) -
Economic Development Administration (Commerce) -
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (Treasury) -
Office of the Under Secretary for Science and Technology (DHS) -
NA US Army Audit Agency (Army) -- --
-- = Not available