Upload
others
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MAKERERE UNIVERSITY
REDUCING CONTAMINATED RESULTS OF LOWENSTEIN JENSEN
CULTURE METHOD AT THE NATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS
REFERENCE LABORATORY
CDC FELLOWS:
NSUBUGA RICHARD (BBLT Hons)
KASULE GEORGE WILLIAM (BBLT Hons)
SUPERVISORS:
MUSISI KENNETH – NATIONAL TB REFERENCE LABORATORY
ERIC IKOONA – MINISTRY OF HEALTH
MEDIUM TERM FELLOWSHIP
CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 2013
NOVEMBER 2013
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ i
DECLARATION PAGE ............................................................................................................ ii
FELLOW’S ROLE IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................... iv
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................v
ABSTRACT/ SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... vi
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ......................................................................1
1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1
1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................1
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................................2
3.0 Statement of the problem ..................................................................................................2
3.1 Problem statement .........................................................................................................3
3.2 Improvement target .......................................................................................................3
3.3 Justification/Rationale ...................................................................................................4
3.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES..............................................................................................4
3.4.1 General Objectives ....................................................................................................4
3.4.2 Specific Objectives ....................................................................................................4
4.0 METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................5
4.1 Problem analysis ...........................................................................................................7
4.2 Activities implemented ............................................................................................... 10
5.0 PROJECT OUTCOMES ..................................................................................................... 11
6.0 LESSONS LEARNT ...................................................................................................... 15
7.0 CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED .................................................................................. 16
8.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 16
8.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 16
8.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 16
8.3 Dissemination plan ...................................................................................................... 17
8.4 Standardization ........................................................................................................... 17
9.0 FUTURE PLANS ........................................................................................................... 17
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 18
ANNEX A Budget ..................................................................................................................... 19
ANNEX B. SOP........................................................................................................................ 22
ii
DECLARATION PAGE
We, Kasule George William and Nsubuga Richard do hereby declare that this end-of-project
report entitled reducing contaminated results of Lowenstein Jensen culture method at the
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory has been prepared and submitted in fulfillment
of the requirements of the Medium-term Fellowship Program at Makerere University School of
Public Health and has not been submitted for any academic or non-academic qualifications.
Signed ………………………………… Date…………………………………..
Kasule George William, Medium-term Fellow
Signed ………………………………… Date…………………………………….
Nsubuga Richard, Medium-term Fellow
Signed ………………………………… Date…………………………………..
Musisi Kenneth, Institutional Supervisor
Laboratory Manager
National TB Refrence Laboratory-Uganda
Signed ………………………………… Date…………………………………..
Dr. Ikoona Eric, Academic Supervisor
Ministry of Health
iii
FELLOW’S ROLE IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
The two CDC fellows were part of this project from initiation, through proposal writing,
implementation and making the final report. The fellows were responsible for spearheading the
formation of a CQI team at NTRL. Together with the CQI team, they identified the problem and
analysed it to come with the root causes. They later implemented the practical methods of the
improvement project.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to first to thank the Lord Almighty who has given us the chance to be part of the
2012 medium term short term fellowship and guided us through the whole period of the
fellowship.
Our sincere thanks also go to goes to our supervisors, Mr. Musisi Kenneth, the Institutional
supervisor, and Dr. Eric Ikoona, the Academic supervisor for their guidance and advice on the
CQI project implementation, proposal and report writing.
We acknowledge the contribution of the CQI team at NTRL for their sparing their time to be part
of this project, their advice and practical contribution especially during the implementation of the
CQI project is greatly noted. Therefore, we acknowledge the contributions of Kenneth Musisi,
Mbeiza Phiona, Nansubuga Christine, Matovu John, Byabajungu Henry and Sam Eyanu
We also acknowledge the Makerere University School of Public Health-CDC (MakSPH-CDC)
Fellowship program for giving us this opportunity to be part of this medium term fellowship and
sponsoring this project. Our sincere thanks go to the coordinators of the fellowship program; Mr.
Joseph Matovu, Stella and Faridah.
v
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CDC – Centre for Disease Control
CQI – Continous Quality Improvement
EQA – External Quality Assessment
LJ - Lowenstein Jensen
NaoH – Sodium Hydroxide
NTRL – National TB Reference Laboratory
QC – Quality Control
SOP – Standard Operating Procedure
TB - Tuberculosis
WHO – World Health Organization
vi
ABSTRACT/ SUMMARY
Issue: The acceptable contamination rate of cultures at the National TB Reference Laboratory
(NTRL) for baseline samples is 2–5%. The NTRL contamination rate of baseline samples is
within the acceptable range but that of follow up samples (which is unkown and therefore CQI
used that of baseline sample as a standard reference for improvement) is high which makes the
general contamination high. The average general contamination rate at NTRL was 10.5% (Sept
2012 -Feb 2013). This high rate led to delay of patient results and in return delay to start
treatment. The root causes identified were; few days of quality control (QC), gaps in SOPs,
deviation from SOPs , poor planning and stock management. Therefore a CQI team planned to
work upon the causes in order to reduce the contamination from 10.5% to 6% in 6 months
(March 2013-Aug 2013).
Intervention description: All the personnel at NTRL were trained in how to plan their
laboratory work. They were mentored on how to manage media stock. Meetings were organized
to discuss the contamination progress. We reviewed the media preparation SOP. The
decontamination SOP was also changed and now they start with mucoid samples. Provided
evidence of deviation from sample processing SOP and mentored staff. Data was collected per
month and analyzed using excel
Intervention out comes: There is now proper planning of work through use of stock cards and
preparation of buffer media to be used after passing quality control checks of 3 weeks. SOPs
reviewed. No more harsh decontamination.
Lessons learnt: We learnt that, proper planning of work, high sterility procedures in media
preparation, careful decontamination of mucoid sputum and good use of reagents reduce
contaminated results at the NTRL.
Recommendation: Developed SOPs should always be strictly followed to reduce
contamination. Only quality control (QC) passed media should be used. Work should always be
planned. NTRL should buy an automatic dispenser.
Conclusion
The average contamination rate reduced to from 10.5% to 8.2%.
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction
The mission of the Uganda National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL) is “To provide quality
laboratory services and to strengthen the national tuberculosis laboratory diagnostic network
through leadership and expert guidance in support of the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy
Control Program to reduce the burden of TB and leprosy in Uganda.One of the objectives of the
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory is to provide laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary and
extra pulmonary tuberculosis disease conditions by performing smear microscopy of stained
suspect specimens and culture in order to harvest TB organisms.
Culturing of Acid Fast Bacilli at NTRL involves decontamination and growing the organisms on
artificial sterilized egg rich media called Lowenstein Jensen media. Despite the fact that sputum
is decontaminated and organisms are cultured on sterilized media, there was still a very high
average general contamination rate in the last 6 months (10.5%) This led to delay of patient
results since the samples were re-decontaminated leading to delayed treatment, continuous TB
transmission by the patient to others, wastage of resources and finally death of some patients.
Therefore a problem analysis was done and interventions identified. These will be implemented
in the next six months using Plan-Do-Check continuous quality improvement method.
1.2 Background
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) standards, the contamination rate for the
National TB Laboratories should be between 2-5% for baselines but it does not specify that of
follow up samples. The Uganda NTRL SOP also recommends a contamination rate of 2-5% of
baseline samples, but that of follow up samples is high and majorly contributes to the general
contamination rate. The general contamination rate and that of follow up samples is unknown.
Therefore, the CQI team used the baseline contamination rate as our standard rate for
improvement. The average general contamination rate was 10.5% for the last 6 month. There is
therefore an urgent need to understand the reasons behind this dismal performance so that
strategies to reduce the contamination rate to 6% are instituted.
2
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by bacteria of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC),
remains a global threat to human health, which causes an estimated 2 million deaths annually
(WHO, 2007). For clinical management of TB, the length of anti-TB therapy (six months of
directly observed therapy) has negative implications for patient adherence, which in turn puts
pressure on health-care systems in developing countries. Globally more than 1.3 million people
die of the disease every year. Nearly one third of the world’s population is infected with TB
bacilli, approximately 10% of them have a life time risk of developing TB disease (TB India,
2010). The incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in Uganda was 179 per 100,000 people in 2012
(WHO, 2012). Like most of sub-Saharan Africa, Uganda has a high prevalence of HIV
(Mbulaiteye et al, 2002) and tuberculosis infection (Migliori et al, 1994). Health care managers
and tuberculosis control authorities in the country believe that the prevalence of the disease is
much higher than revealed by notification figures because of underreporting and due to poor
access to health care. Uganda also has one of the lowest TB cure rates (32%) and high drug
default rate (WHO, 2009), which may lead to an increase in drug resistance mutations.
M. tuberculosis culture is still the cornerstone on which definitive diagnosis of TB relies. Egg-
based Lowenstein-Jensen media has been used for cultivation of mycobacteria for several
decades. Contamination rates <2% indicates overly harsh decontamination, which means that too
many tubercle bacilli are killed. If the laboratory is experiencing delays in delivery of specimens
the contamination rate may be greater than 5% (Revised National TB Control Programme
manual, 2009). After inspissation, the whole media batch of the media bottles should be
incubated at 35o C-37
0C for 24 hours as a check for bacterial sterility. After 24 hours 5% of the
slopes should picked up randomly and continued for incubation for 14 days to check for fungal
sterility. In both the cases the contamination rate should not be > 10 % (Revised National TB
Control Programme manual, 2009).
3.0 Statement of the problem
The policy guidelines of NTRL and Standard Operating procedure (SOP) of LJ Culture
diagnostic method at NTRL states that the contamination rate of baseline samples should be 2-
5%. But, that of follow up is unknown (so the CQI team used that of baseline samples as the
standard for improvement) and yet contributes more to the general contamination rate at NTRL.
3
Data from the Data team at NTRL showed that the average contamination rate for the last six
months of 2013 has been 10.5%.
A high contamination rate effects patients directly in the following ways; one patients delay to
get results and hence starting treatment in case of a positive patient (any positive patient whose is
not treatment infects about 15 people annually) and secondly to the institution through wastage
of resources .
Figure 1: The graph below shows the contamination rate of LJ culture method at NTRL (Sept 2012 –
Feb 2013)
3.1 Problem statement
For the last 6 months (September 2012 – February 2013), the average contamination rate of LJ
TB culture method at the National TB Reference Laboratory was 10.5% which is above the
standard rate of 5% hence leading to delayed patient results and in return delay to start TB
treatment
3.2 Improvement target
To reduce the general contamination rate of LJ culture method from 10.5 to 6% (average) in 6
months (March – August 2013).
Average contamination rate
4
Figure 2: The graph shows the improvement target
3.3 Justification/Rationale
The LJ method is one of the traditional phenotypic methods used in diagnosis of TB. It is used to
confirm TB disease following microscopy results and monitoring TB treatment outcome of
patients. A positive result of LJ takes 2-8 weeks, negative results is 8 weeks and contaminated
results as early as 2 days. A contaminated result requires one to re-decontaminate the sample
which means that patient’s results and treatment are delayed and furthermore wastage of
resources like reagents.
3.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
3.4.1 General Objectives
To reduce the contamination rate of LJ culture at NTRL from 10.5% to 6% on average from
March – August 2013) in order to improve the quality of patient care.
3.4.2 Specific Objectives
1. To analyse the current performance levels in order to understand the reasons for
suboptimal performance
2. To improve media preparation procedure and quality control
3. To improve the decontamination procedure.
4. To improve the inventory management of media preparation and use at NTRL
Current average
contamination rate
Improvement target
5
4.0 METHODOLOGY
A continuous quality improvement (CQI) presentation was done to introduce the whole NTRL
staff to the fellowship program and solicit members to join the NTRL CQI team. All meetings
were held at the NTRL training room and the selected CQI team met afterwards to carryout
problem identification and analysis. Problem analysis was done using the root cause analysis
strategy. A Plan –Do- Check –Act (PDCA) methodology was used to implement the
interventions every after 2 months.
Team members
This team comprised of Kasule George William (CDC Fellow), Nsubuga Richard (CDC Fellow),
Kenneth Musisi (Laboratory Manager), Byabajungu Henry (Laboratory Supervisor), Nansubuga
Chrsitine (Quality Manager), Eyanu Sam (NTRL Quality team), Matovu John Baptist
(Laboratory Technologist) and Mbeiza Fiona (Administrative Assistant).
The CQI team brainstormed on various quality improvement projects and voted on one that CDC
fellow would handle for their study project. Below is the list of quality improvement projects
identified during the meeting and a theme number coded to each for multi voting purposes.
Table 1: Quality improvement projects
Quality Improvement Project Theme No
Delay to complete action points from audits 1
Reducing the contamination rate of LJ culture 2
Increased number of incomplete patient request forms 3
All Customer complaints are not captured and few are resolved 4
Irregular performance of Fluorescent microscopy by EQA sites 5
Insufficient knowledge of root cause analysis 6
After coming up with the list of proposed quality improvement projects, each member was
requested to explain why a particular theme was a problem and to make it more clear to all the
members before the voting session.
6
Below is a table showing the multi voting of the NTRL CQI team which identified reducing the
contamination rate of LJ Culture method as the quality improvement project of the CDC CQI
fellows.
Table 2: Showing voting of identified problems
Theme code 1st Vote 2
nd Vote 3
rd Vote
1 3
2 6 5 5
3 3
4 4 1
5 4 3
6 4 2
7
1
Do not start with thick samples
4.1 Problem analysis
LJ
contamination
rate above the
acceptable 5%
Management
Media
Environment
Personnel
Process
Unsterile media
Insufficient sterilization and cleaning
No process plan (lack inventory
management skills)
Non-sterile media preparation process
Manual media dispensing
Chemical contamination
Insuficient decontamination
Insufficient QC of media
SOP states 2 days
Insufficient supervision of surbodinates
Lack training of
inventory management
Harsh decontamination
Media used before passing QC
Media not enough
Lack of supervision skills
Lack of capacity building
within NTRL Lack of appraisals
Deviate from SOP
Lack of planning skills
SOP not address
starting with them.
Not tested in local setting
SOP lacked the
manual media
procedure and sorting.
Poor stock
management
Poor planning of Work
No training in
planning
Figure 3: Problem analysis; Fish born analysis
Deviation from the
Processing SOP
Not trained in
management.
8
Flowchart showing media preparation process at NTRL
with possible bottlenecks
Flowchart showing specimen reception and processing at
NTRL with possible bottlenecks
Figure 3: Flowchart showing specimen reception and processing at
NTRL Figure 4: Flowchart showing media preparation process
9
Figure 5: Countermeasure matrix
LJ
contamination rate
above the
acceptabl
e of 5%
Gaps in media
preparation and
sample
processing SOPs
Days of media
QC not tested
in local setting
Tested QC days
in NTRL setting
Problem Root cause Countermeasure Practical methods used
Incubated media for 2 days and 3 weeks
Incorporated;
- manual media dispensing procedures,
- Sorting media at 3 stages
- 3 weeks of QC
- Hired trainers
-Trained 30 staff on planning, delegation,
coordination and team work
Poor planning
and stock
management
skills - Stock cards introduced
- Minimum stocks determined
- Prepared buffer media stocks
Process thick (mucoid) samples first
Reviewed SOP
Leadership and
management
training
Deviation from
sample
processing SOP
CQI team
provided
evidence based
information
Demonstrated effects of harsh processing
procedure
Mentored personnel
on inventory
management
10
4.2 Activities implemented
Through the above CQI story, the baseline performance and root causes for sub-optimal
performance identified.
To improve media preparation and quality control ,the following were done
(i) Tested the sterility check in our local NTRL setting by incubating the media for two days
and three weeks and observed the contamination rates before media was used.
(ii) Media preparation SOP was also reviewed and incorporated manual dispensing
procedure and a three stage sorting mechanism; during sterility check ( after 2 days), after
viability check(after 3 weeks) , and before inoculation. A three week quality control
procedure was also incorporated in the SOP(Since it had been proved to be working in
our local setting)
To improve the decontamination procedure, the following activities were done
(i) The decontamination SOP was adjusted to start with thick samples (since most of the
contaminated samples were thick).
(ii) Furthermore we met the processing team and discussed the effects of harsh
decontamination (a cause of chemical contamination). They were also advised to read
the labels on reagents before making a digestion mixture and decontaminating for
strictly 20 minutes in order to prevent harsh decontamination
(iii)The process was also supervised
To improve inventory management of media preparation and use the following were done
(i) The fellows with personnel in the media preparation section prepared media buffer
stocks. This was done to ensure that there is enough media to be used and give ample
time to the other to pass QC before being used.
(ii) Stock cards were used to monitor the media inventory
(iii) A Leadership and management training course was conducted for all staff at NTRL by
ACLAIM Africa. This focused on leadership and management, team building and
dynamics, communication and delegation were NTRL staff obtained various skills
including proper planning of their work.
11
Fig:Management training for NTRL staff
(iv) The fellows worked with personnel using media and showed them how to fill in the stock
cards on a daily basis or whenever it was used. The documentation on the stock cards
included media lost due to contamination before it was used.
5.0 PROJECT OUTCOMES
5.1 Established major root causes of contamination
The problem of high general contamination rate is has been persistent at NTRL and its causes
have been suggestions and assumptions. This project brainstormed and also produced evidence
based information to the probable major causes of contamination (see root cause analysis above).
And from this major emphasis has now been put in place and SOP revised to this effect.
The project identified that the major causes were; use of media before passing internal QC (since
the sterility check had not been tested in our local setting), un revised media preparation and
decontamination SOPs, deviation the decontamination SOPs, poor planning skills and inventory
management.
12
The sterility check (media QC) was tested in our local setting.
We found that the contamination of of media before use in two days was less than 1 % yet that
after 3 weeks was higher than 5%(from the table below).It was also observed that some of the
spotted media turned contaminated after 3 weeks.
Table 3. Showing the trend of contamination rates of different media batches before use
after three weeks of incubation.
TOTAL
NUMBEROF
SLANTS MADE
PER BATCH
CONTAMINATION
OF SLANTS
AFTER THREE
WEEKS
FATE OF SPOTTED MEDIA SLANTS
AFTER THREE WEKS
CONT
RATE
OF MEDIA
BEFORE
USE
BATC
H NO.
TOTAL
NO.
SLANT
S
MADE
INITIAL
NO.CON
T
CONT
RATE(%
)
NO. OF
SPOTED
SLANTS
NO.
TURNED
CONT
CONT
RATE FOR
SPOTED
SLANTS
GENENERA
L SLANT
CONT
RATE(%)
48 1310 226 17.3 116 56 48 21.5
49 1320 75 5.7 528 142 27 16.4
50 1320 83 6.3 125 33 26 8.7
51 1320 100 7.5 48 12 25. 8.4
This implied that the sterility check of 2 days was insufficient for the media quality control since
there is a high contamination rate after 3 weeks. The decreasing trend in red was due to our
interventions ie revising media preparation SOPs.
5.2 Revision of SOPs
The SOPs of plain LJ media preparation and sample processing have been revised. The Plain LJ
media preparation SOP now reflects the need of Internal QC being done for three weeks before it
is used; this is to allow slow contaminants to appear so that they are sorted out. In addition, the
sample processing SOP reflects the need of starting with mucoid samples when processing.
13
5.3 Adherence to SOP
The decontamination team has adhered to the decontamination SOP. They use the right reagents
and decontaminate in strictly 20 minutes. Harsh decontamination has reduced
5.4 Documentation of stock cards
The use of stock cards has been adopted in the media preparation and sample processing
sections. Through these stock cards, the use of media is monitored so that more is prepared when
it reached the minimum stock which allows media to pass QC before use.
5.5 Laboratory personnel trained
All laboratory personnel were trained in proper planning of laboratory work
5.6 Reduction of average contamination rate
The average general contamination rate for the period of September 2012 to February 2013 was
10.5%. With the intervention of the CQI fellows, this has reduced 7.2% from March 2013-
August 2013.
Average general contamination rate before the interventions
Acceptable average cont rate
Baseline
contamination
rate rate
Improvement target
14
Fig. Average contamination after the interventions (Mar-Aug)
The average contamination rate reduced to 8.2%. the contamination rate in June 2013 increased
beyond compared to rest of the months. During the CQI project, it was discovered that it was due
to harsh processing (redecontamation) procedure in the sample processing section. Due to this,
the inoculated media appeared whitish and therefore interpreted as contaminated yet in the real
sense they were not. More so, was due to use hands to dispense media since the automatic
dispenser had broken down(manual dispensing) yet the SOP had not been revised.
The CQI team held meetings with the processing section and advised them about the effect of the
harsh processing procedure. We also revised the media preparation SOP to cater for manual
dispensing. With this, the contamination rate reduced in the subsequent months of July and
August.
Acceptable cont rate (2-5%)
Previous Average cont rate –
10.5% (Sep 2012 – Feb
2013) Current Average cont rate
– 8.2% (Mar 2013 – Aug
2013)
Acceptable average cont rate range
Contamination rate
before intervention
Improvement target
15
6.0 LESSONS LEARNT
We learnt the following lessons
The major causes of contamination at NTRL were; use of media before passing internal
QC (since the sterility check had not been tested in our local setting), un-revised media
preparation and decontamination SOPs, deviation the decontamination SOPs, poor
planning skills and inventory management.
Incubating media for three weeks enables all organisms on the contaminated slants to
grow and therefore easily sorted out which later reduces rate of contaminated results
Revision of the media preparation SOP to include the manual/hand dispensing procedure
and various sorting stages enables one to obtain sterilize slants for inoculation hence
reduced contaminated results.
Revision of SOP to start with thick samples and break the mucous thoroughly reduces
contamination.
Adherence to the decontamination SOP by using right reagents, right concentrations and
processing for strictly 20 minutes reduces chemical contamination since there is no harsh
decontamination.
Training personnel in management improves planning, delegation and team work skills
hence the amount of media to be prepared and the dates are planned hence media gets
enough time for quality control. More-so the lab does not run out of quality controlled
media since there is proper delegation of work and team work and there for only sterile
media used hence reduced rate of contaminated results.
Proper inventory/stock management using stock cards leads to good monitoring of media
stocks hence more is prepared when the minimum stock is reached which allows media
to pass QC before use and finally reduced result contamination rates.
16
7.0 CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED
The major challenge faced was the personnel were not consistent in implementing it the
interventions identified. There was a major challenge of not implementing the SOP by
everyone in the laboratory.
The below shows the other challenges faced and solutions implemented.
Challenges Solutions
(i) Nonfunctional Automatic dispenser
(ii) Contamination increased in June due to
harsh decontamination i.e. excessive use of
NaOH solution
(iii) One autoclave functional for both
infectious waste and media utensils
(i)-Hand dispensing done, SOP revised,
- prepared many batches, flow chart
desighned
(ii) - Held a meeting to discovered root
cause (i.e. use of excessive NaOH)
(iii) Discussed with team in processing
section; reconstitute digestion mixture
according the SOP.
(iv) autoclaving infectious and non-
infectious them separately
8.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 Conclusions
The average contamination rate reduced from 10.5% (September 2012-Feburay 2013) to 8.2%
(March - August 2013)
8.2 Recommendations
• At the institution, we recommend that the management enforces the strict following of
the SOP put in place especially those with interventions of the CQI team.
• Continuous improvement should now focus on follow up samples
• Strict adherence to SOPs including interventions
• Procure another or repair non-functional autoclave
17
8.3 Dissemination plan
The project outcomes have been presented at the Institution (NTRL) where the whole laboratory
was present. The CQI project and its outcomes will also be disseminated at the MakSPH-CDC
Fellowship Program and other sister laboratories and institutions.
8.4 Standardization
The project interventions have been adopted into the NTRL SOPs. With subsequent days, the
interventions will be followed by all personnel in the laboratory and become daily routine. The
NTRL SOPs may be adopted by other culture laboratories in Uganda.
9.0 FUTURE PLANS
The CQI team and management of NTRL will continue with the improvement process to reach
the acceptable range. The remaining problems which were generated will also be worked upon
18
REFERENCES
Mbulaiteye S.M., C Mahe, J.A. Whitworth, et al. (2002): Declining HIV-1 Incidence and the
associated Prevalence over ten years in a rural population in south-west Uganda: A Cohort
Study, Lancet, 360:41-6
TB India (2010): RNTCP Status Report [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2010 Jun 1]. Available from:
http://tbcindia.nic.in/ pdfs/TB%20India%202010.pdf
Revised National TB Control Programme (2009): Training Manual for Mycobacterium
tuberculosis Culture & Drug susceptibility testing. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Nirman Bhawan,New Delhi 110011.
19
ANNEX A Budget
CQI PROPOSAL BUDGET Activity code Activities
Unit of Measure
Units
Unit Cost (Ug. Shs)
Total (Ug.Shs) Justification
ACTIVITY 1: TRAINING STAFF IN PLANNING AND CORDINATION SKILLS (Three times)
1.1
Trainer Persons
3
800,000 x 3 2,400,000
From our root cause analysis, NTRL has major gaps in coordination, planning and inventory management. Therefore there is need of a management training which will focus at all these aspects. Training facilitation for a consultant trainer, quotation from one of the firms indicates $320 per day per trainer. Training will carried out on 3 occasions (each session last one day), every 2 months during the implementation of the CQI project
1.2
Facilitation costs
Persons
30
20,000 x 3
1,800,000
Each training session takes the one whole day hence the need to provide breakfast and Lunch to participants. 20,000 per person for Breakfast (5000=) and Lunch (15,000=) for attending participants at the institution. Rate determined by service providers usually utilized by the institution during workshops and trainings. (There will be three training sessions)
1.3
Markers
Box (10 markers each)
3 20,000
60,000
One box of markers to be used per day during the three training sessions. Price determined by external markets around Kampala
1.4 Note books books
30 2,000
60,000
Note books for participants during training sessions. Will be given out once during the first training session. Price determined by external markets around Kampala
1.5
Pens piece 30 500
15,000
Pens for participants during training sessions. Will be given out once during the first training session. Price determined by external markets around Kampala
1.6 Ream of papers ream
2 15,000
30,000
Reams of paper for printing training materials/handouts during the 3 sessions. Price determined by external markets around Kampala.
1.7 Flip charts chart
3 15,000
45,000
A flip chart will be used per training session hence three flip charts for the 3 sessions. Price determined by external markets around Kampala.
Sub Total
4,410,000
ACTIVITY 2 Improving stock taking and sterilization procedures
20
2.1
Laptop piece 1 - -
-For monitoring the stock. - Preparing presentation of CQI project progress and developing of CQI procedures. - To be provided by the institution.
2.2 Sub Total -
ACTIVITY 3: DEVELOPING A PROCEDURE FOR STERLISATION
3.1 Ream of papers ream
2 15,000
30,000 for printing and dissemination of procedures
3.2
Camera piece 1 500,000
500,000
According to our SOP, newly prepared media batch is sorted only once after incubation for 2 days at 37 0C to discard the slopes contaminated. But this only eliminates the fast growing contaminants .In practice we have observed contaminants after 2weeks.Therefore we are going to incubate media for 2weeks at 37
0C to discard more contaminated slopes before
using them. We would like to photograph all the contaminated slopes after 2weeks as evidence that there are also other slow growing contaminants which contaminate the media before samples are inoculated. This will provide a strong ground for changing our operating procedures but unfortunately we don’t have a camera at NTRL. More so this camera will be used to photo graph the current autoclaving procedures of over packing the autoclave with un sorted slopes rendering some bottles unsterile and our proposed procedures of sorting the contaminated slopes and autoclaving them separately at slightly higher temperatures. Price determined by external market around Kampala. .
Sub Total
530,000
ACTIVITY 4: Preparing culture media for the next six months
4.1
LJ Culture slants Bottles
1,000 2,000
2,000,000
NTRL reuses culture bottles for preparing media. There is need to procure more bottles to allow for enough time of recycling the used ones so that sterilization process is completed adequately. - To obtain 1000 supplementary cultures for preparing adequate media so
21
that it is not used before passing QC.
Sub Total
2,000,000
ACTIVITY 5:WORKSHOP FOR DISSEMINATION OF CQI RESULTS
5.1
Facilitation costs
Persons
30 10,000
300,000
Dissemination meeting of project results and lesson learnt to the rest of the NTRL staff from 9.00 am – 12.30 pm in September or October 2013. Facilitation cost will be 10,000 per person which includes coffee/tea, snack and refreshments during the dissemination meeting.
Ream of paper Ream 1 15000 15,000
For printing handouts of CQI results and presentation to be distributed to the 30 persons attending the dissemination workshop above.
Projector
Training room at NTRL 1 - - -
For presentation of CQI results during the dissemination meeting. To be provided by the institution
Venue,
Training room at NTRL 1 - - -
For presentation of CQI results during the dissemination meeting. To be provided by the institution
5.2 Binding of report
booklet
10 10,000
100,000
Final Copies for dissemination to the School of Public Health (4 copies), NTRL institution (2 copies), CDC fellows (2 copies), to supervisors (2 copies)
Sub Total
415,000
GRAND TOTAL 7,355,000
Source of Funds
CDC MakSPH 6,250,000
NTRL 1,105,000
Total Amount 7,355,000
(NB. Exchange rate is 2500 USD)
22
ANNEX B. SOP