Maintenance Optimization: A Critical Aspect of the ... · PDF fileMaintenance Optimization: A Critical Aspect of the ... –Generator electrical power output reduction > ... (Not listed

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Maintenance Optimization:

    A Critical Aspect of the

    Equipment Reliability

    Program

    Russ Warren, INPO

    IAEA, Vienna

    October 2011

  • Functional

    Equipment Groups

    and Functional

    Importance

    Determination

    Process Overview

    Performance

    Monitoring Plans

    (PMP)

    Maintenance

    Optimization (MO)

    Long Term Plan

    (LTP)

    Post

    Maintenance

    Test

    Maintenance

    Feedback

    Work

    Implementation

    (AP-928)

    Single Point

    Failure Study

    Plant and

    system

    Performace

    Risks

    Options

    Identification

    and Selection

    Risk Ranking

    Mitigation

    Strategies

    PM Options

    for Solving

    Health Risk

    + =+

    PM Task Scope,

    Justification and

    Frequency

    FEGs and

    Crit. for

    Work

    Management

    Component

    Criticality

    To Work

    Management

    Decisions Related to What to DoDecisions Related

    to How to Do

    Justification

    No PM

    Required"

    Enablers

    * Operating Experience

    * Industry baseline

    programs (EPRI)

    * Experienced people

    * Computer Tools

    Corporate

    Nuclear Asset

    Management

    Strategic

    Planning

    To

    Budgeting

    Process

    Budgeting

    Process

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Core Processes Data Management

    Functional Equipment Groups (FEG) to Support

    Automated Work Scheduling

    Criticality Determination

    Single Point Failure Vulnerability

    Critical Components and Critical Spares

    Performance Monitoring Plan (PMP) Development and

    Monitoring

    Maintenance Optimization (MO)

    Long Term Plan Development

    Corrective Action Program

    Maintenance Feedback

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Maintenance optimization

    Objectives of NPP maintenance

    optimization

    Maintenance optimization requirements

    and maintenance

    Key elements of maintenance

    optimization programmes

    Performance indicators

    2011

    Institute

    of

    Nuclear

    Power

    Operatio

    ns

  • FEG - What is a FEG?

    AA

    A

    AA

    A

    Process

    Flow

    Cooling

    Flow

    Heat

    Exchanger

    FEG Boundary

    Air Flow

    Fan Breaker

    Motor

    Breaker

    Motor and

    Pump

    This Room Cooler is included in

    the FEG because a loss of the

    Cooler will cause a loss of the

    function of the FEG.

    Loss of this instrument will not

    cause a loss of function.

    The FEG boundary equipment

    becomes the 'standard'

    clearance tag-out for this FEG.

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Criticality Determination

    Identify those components most critical to plant safety and reliability

    Used to allocate resources

    Used to prioritize work

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Critical component failures cause

    significant power transient or derate

    loss of a redundant safety function

    unplanned entry into a technical

    specification LCO

    half scram or partial trip

    reactor shutdown

    actuation of emergency safeguards

    features 2011

    Institute

    of

    Nuclear

    Power

    Operatio

    ns

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Critical component failure cause failure to control a critical safety function such as reactor

    water level and pressure, primary and secondary

    containment, drywell temperature and pressure, or spent

    fuel pool temperature and level

    degraded capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a shutdown condition

    inability to perform an emergency operating procedure, or to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents that

    could result in potential off-site exposure in excess of

    10CFR100 limits; operator workaround

    operator workaround for performing any of the above functions or procedures.

    2011

    Institute

    of

    Nuclear

    Power

    Operatio

    ns

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Sample Criticality Analysis Results

    61287 components reviewed

    Crit 1 = 13331, or 22% (SR)

    Crit 2 = 26462, or 43% (Important)

    Crit N = 21494, or 35% (Run to failure)

    Effort

    22 Weeks

    4400 Consultant Man-Hours

    2100 Internal Man-Hours

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Single Point Vulnerability Study CRITERIA: A SPV exists if failure of a single

    component results in:

    Reactor Trip, or

    Turbine Trip, or

    Generator electrical power output reduction >

    5%.

    (Note: Initial condition 100% power)

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Most Significant Components

    Affecting Unit Reliability -

    As Derived from SPV Studies

    Air-operated valves

    Emergency diesel generator - electrical

    Main feedwater pump

    Main generator and support systems

    (Not listed in order of importance)

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Non-critical component

    Component failure creates an unacceptable increase in personnel, industrial, environmental, or radiological safety

    hazard.

    The component has a history of unacceptably high repair, replacement, or operational cost.

    Component failure represents an operator or maintenance burden.

    The component is obsolete, in short supply, or very expensive to repair or replace.

    There is a long lead time for replacement parts, which prevents a required component from being repaired in a

    timely fashion.

    The component is necessary for work on critical equipment (for example, isolation valve). 2011

    Institute

    of

    Nuclear

    Power

    Operatio

    ns

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Non-critical component Component failure promotes failure of other

    components.

    There is a potential for new risks from hazardous chemicals or environmental concerns.

    Failure results in a power transient, sustained generation loss, or reduction in the necessary

    redundancy or defense in-depth.

    Failure may lead to regulatory consequences.

    Component failure will hamper or prevent timely repair of a critical component.

    It is more cost-effective to maintain the component, as opposed to repair or replacement.

  • 2011 World Association of Nuclear Operators

    Run to failure components

    A run-to-failure component is one for which the risks and consequences of failure are

    acceptable without any predictive or repetitive

    maintenance being performed and there is not a

    simple, cost-effective method to extend the

    useful life of the component.

    The component should be run until corrective maintenance is required.

    2011

    Institute

    of

    Nuclear

    Power

    Operatio

    ns

  • Performance Monitoring

    Pressure Instrument

    * Operating Log - Discharge Pressure

    within Band

    * PM - calibration

    (In a Calibration FEG)

    AA

    A

    Typical Equipment Reliability Program

    FEG Boundary and Characteristic

    Information

    Operating Rounds:

    (MO)

    * Sight

    * Smell

    * Feel

    * Hear

    Engineering :

    * Walk-down Inspection

    * Operational Performance

    * Problem Resolution

    * Trends in Performance

    * System and Component

    Health Reports

    Recorded Parameters : (PMP)

    * Plant Operating Logs - in band

    * Plant Operating Logs - trended

    * Plant Computer - in band

    * Plant Computer - trended

    Required Levels of

    Performance :

    * Reliability

    (Functional Failures)

    * Unavailability

    * Cost

    * Basis for Levels of

    Performance

    Manual Valve

    * Run to Failure

    Breaker

    * Plant Computer - Number of

    Breaker Cycles

    * Plant Computer - With Flow,

    Calculate Run Time

    * PM - Disassembly and Inspection

    * PM - Overhaul

    * PdM - Thermography

    Check Valve

    * PdM Acoustic

    Monitoring

    * PM - Sample

    Inspections

    Flow Instrument

    * Plant Computer - calculate run

    time, ID degraded flow

    * PM - calibration

    Pump

    * PdM - Vibration Monitoring

    * PdM - Oil Sample

    * STP - Performance Test

    * Operations - Periodic Rotation of

    Redundant Equipment

    Operate:

    * Operate per Procedures

    * Configure Plant for

    Maintenance

    Time or Condition Based

    Repetitive Maintenance: (MO)

    * Preventive Maintenance (PM)

    * Predictive Maintenance (PdM)

    * Planned Maintenance

    * List Surveillance Test

    Procedures (STPs)

    * Basis for Repetitive

    Maintenance

    Maintain:

    * Efficient and Quality

    Maintenance and Post

    Maintenance Test

    * Documentation

    * Feedback /

    Recommendations for

    Improvement

    Manage Work:

    * Current Life-cycle Plan

    * Schedule Work to Manage Risk

    and Greatest Efficiency

    * Schedule then Plan Work

    Criticality Determination:

    * Equipment Importance

    * Basis